POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Proposed Protection for Wounded Knee Massacre Site (S. 2088)

Original title: S. 2088

January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The bill would legally codify a 2022 agreement by the Oglala Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes to permanently protect 40 acres of the Wounded Knee Massacre site from commercial use.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Oglala Sioux Tribe

The tribe is a co-owner of the land and would be subject to the federal restrictions imposed by the bill.

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe

The tribe is a co-owner of the land and would be subject to the federal restrictions imposed by the bill.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs held a hearing to discuss S. 2088, a bill that would place 40 acres of land at the Wounded Knee Massacre site into '.' This status would legally enforce a tribal to preserve the land as a sacred memorial, prohibiting commercial development or gaming.

Key Facts

  • S. 2088 proposes placing 40 acres of land at the Wounded Knee Massacre site into restricted fee status.
  • The land is currently owned in fee by the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.
  • The tribes purchased the 40-acre site from a private owner in September 2022.
  • A 2022 covenant signed by the tribes restricts the land to use as a memorial and sacred site.
  • The covenant explicitly prohibits commercial development and Indian gaming on the property.
  • The Wounded Knee Massacre occurred on December 29, 1890, on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.
  • The site is historically significant as the location where hundreds of unarmed Lakota people were killed by the U.S. Army.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does 'restricted fee status' mean for this land?
It is a legal status that would allow the federal government to enforce the tribes' own , ensuring the land remains a memorial and cannot be used for commercial development or gaming.
Who owns the land currently?
The Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe jointly purchased the 40 acres from a private owner in 2022.
Will this bill allow for new buildings or businesses on the site?
No. The bill is intended to codify a that prohibits commercial development and Indian gaming on the property.

Why It Matters

The bill would legally codify a 2022 agreement by the Oglala Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes to permanently protect 40 acres of the Wounded Knee Massacre site from commercial use.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

POLITICO GROUP

on behalf of WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES A DIVISION OF AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS

Senate LDAView filing →

POLITICO GROUP

on behalf of CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE OF PLUMBING HEATING & PIPING INDUSTRY

Senate LDAView filing →

GOVERNMENTAL ADVOCATES INC.

on behalf of CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

POLITICO GROUP

on behalf of WESTERN WALL & CEILING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal Enforcement of Tribal Covenants

The bill represents a mechanism where the federal government uses 'restricted fee status' to provide legal teeth to a private tribal land-use covenant.

Connected Entities

personBrian SchatzChairman of the Committee on Indian AffairsMap →
organizationOglala Sioux TribeCo-owner of the 40-acre siteMap →
personJohn ThuneU.S. Senator from South DakotaMap →
personWizipan GarriottPrincipal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian AffairsMap →
personMike RoundsU.S. Senator from South DakotaMap →
organizationCheyenne River Sioux TribeCo-owner of the 40-acre siteMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record