POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Protection for Wounded Knee Massacre Site (S. 2088)

Original title: S. 2088

Record date · January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs held a hearing to discuss S. 2088, a bill that would place 40 acres of land at the Wounded Knee Massacre site into '.' This status would legally enforce a tribal to preserve the land as a sacred memorial, prohibiting commercial development or gaming.

Why it matters

The bill would legally codify a 2022 agreement by the Oglala Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes to permanently protect 40 acres of the Wounded Knee Massacre site from commercial use.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Oglala Sioux Tribe

The tribe is a co-owner of the land and would be subject to the federal restrictions imposed by the bill.

Directly affected

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe

The tribe is a co-owner of the land and would be subject to the federal restrictions imposed by the bill.

Key Facts

  • S. 2088 proposes placing 40 acres of land at the Wounded Knee Massacre site into restricted fee status.
  • The land is currently owned in fee by the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.
  • The tribes purchased the 40-acre site from a private owner in September 2022.
  • A 2022 covenant signed by the tribes restricts the land to use as a memorial and sacred site.
Show all 7 facts
  • The covenant explicitly prohibits commercial development and Indian gaming on the property.
  • The Wounded Knee Massacre occurred on December 29, 1890, on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.
  • The site is historically significant as the location where hundreds of unarmed Lakota people were killed by the U.S. Army.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does 'restricted fee status' mean for this land?
It is a legal status that would allow the federal government to enforce the tribes' own , ensuring the land remains a memorial and cannot be used for commercial development or gaming.
Who owns the land currently?
The Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe jointly purchased the 40 acres from a private owner in 2022.
Will this bill allow for new buildings or businesses on the site?
No. The bill is intended to codify a that prohibits commercial development and Indian gaming on the property.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal Enforcement of Tribal Covenants

The bill represents a mechanism where the federal government uses 'restricted fee status' to provide legal teeth to a private tribal land-use covenant.

Connected Entities

Brian Schatz, Oglala Sioux Tribe, Wizipan Garriott and 3 more
PersonBrian Schatz“Chairman of the Committee on Indian Affairs”Map →
OrganizationOglala Sioux Tribe“Co-owner of the 40-acre site”Map →
PersonWizipan Garriott“Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs”Map →
PersonJohn Thune“U.S. Senator from South Dakota”Map →
PersonMike Rounds“U.S. Senator from South Dakota”Map →
OrganizationCheyenne River Sioux Tribe“Co-owner of the 40-acre site”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record