POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Hybrid Warfare and National Security Challenges

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 115-22]THE EVOLUTION OF HYBRID WARFARE AND KEY CHALLENGES

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing informs potential changes to U.S. military doctrine and national security capabilities to better counter non-traditional threats from foreign adversaries.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Military

The military may be required to adapt its doctrine and capabilities to counter unconventional threats.

Foreign Adversaries (Russia, China, Iran)

These nations are identified as the primary users of the hybrid tactics being investigated by the committee.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Armed Services Committee held a hearing on March 22, 2017, to discuss the evolution of ''—a mix of unconventional tactics like cyberattacks, influence operations, and political interference used by foreign nations. The committee examined how these tactics challenge traditional U.S. military doctrines that distinguish clearly between states of war and peace.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 22, 2017, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The committee defined hybrid warfare as the use of centrally directed instruments of power—including cyber activity, media influence, and non-uniformed personnel—to achieve objectives below the threshold of traditional war.
  • The Chairman identified Russia, China, and Iran as nations currently utilizing these hybrid tactics.
  • The committee aims to develop new U.S. capabilities to counter these unconventional threats.
  • The hearing included testimony from experts representing the RAND Corporation, National Defense University, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Why It Matters

This hearing informs potential changes to U.S. military doctrine and national security capabilities to better counter non-traditional threats from foreign adversaries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is hybrid warfare?
It is a strategy that uses a mix of unconventional tools—such as cyberattacks, social media influence, and political interference—to advance national interests without engaging in traditional, declared warfare.
Why is the committee concerned about these tactics?
The committee believes current U.S. military doctrine is designed for a binary state of 'war or peace,' making it difficult to respond effectively to these '' tactics used by adversaries.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in Military Doctrine

The committee explicitly acknowledges that U.S. military doctrine is currently ill-equipped for 'gray zone' conflicts, signaling a potential long-term shift in defense policy.

Connected Entities

personChristopher S. ChivvisWitness, RAND CorporationMap →
personFrancis G. HoffmanWitness, National Defense UniversityMap →
personWilliam M. 'Mac' ThornberryChairman of the House Armed Services CommitteeMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Armed ServicesCongressional committee conducting the hearingMap →
personAndrew ShearerWitness, Center for Strategic and International StudiesMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record