POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on the Wildfire Budgeting, Response, and Forest Management Act of 2016

Original title: DISCUSSION DRAFT ENTITLED THE ``WILDFIRE BUDGETING, RESPONSE, AND FOREST MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2016''

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The proposed legislation aims to change how federal agencies budget for wildfire fighting, which impacts how much funding is available for forest management and fire prevention activities on public lands.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Department of Agriculture

The agency manages national forests and would be subject to new budgeting and management requirements under the proposed act.

U.S. Department of the Interior

The agency oversees federal wildland fire policy and would be impacted by changes to fire suppression funding.

Timber Industry

The industry is affected by changes to forest management policies that dictate timber harvesting and land use on federal property.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2016 Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing regarding proposed legislation to change how the federal government funds wildfire suppression and manages forest lands. The hearing included testimony from federal officials, state land managers, and industry representatives.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 23, 2016, by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
  • The committee reviewed a discussion draft of the 'Wildfire Budgeting, Response, and Forest Management Act of 2016'.
  • The hearing included testimony from representatives of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • State-level officials from Washington and California provided testimony regarding forest management practices.
  • Industry and conservation groups, including the Montana Wood Products Association and Defenders of Wildlife, provided input on the draft legislation.
  • The hearing record includes various charts and maps regarding hazardous fuel treatment areas and timber impacts by state.

Why It Matters

The proposed legislation aims to change how federal agencies budget for wildfire fighting, which impacts how much funding is available for forest management and fire prevention activities on public lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The committee met to discuss and gather testimony on a draft bill aimed at reforming how the federal government budgets for wildfires and manages forest lands.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included federal officials from the Departments of Agriculture and Interior, state forestry directors from Washington and California, and representatives from timber and conservation organizations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in Wildfire Funding Strategy

The hearing highlights a legislative attempt to move away from traditional wildfire suppression budgeting toward a more integrated forest management approach.

Connected Entities

personBryan RiceDirector, Office of Wildland Fire, U.S. Department of the InteriorMap →
personMaria CantwellRanking Member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →
personLisa MurkowskiChairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →
personRobert BonnieUnder Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of AgricuMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record