POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas Legislature considers KIRK Act to establish campus free speech protections and civil penalties for public universities

Original title: AN ACT concerning education; relating to postsecondary educational institutions; enacting the Kansas intellectual rights and knowledge act; providing a civil cause of action and penalties for violations of such act; authorizing students and student associations to exercise political and ideological beliefs, values and missions; amending K.S.A. 60-5311, 60-5312 and 60-5313 and repealing the existing sections.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in House Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

The Kansas Legislature proposed the Kansas Intellectual Rights and Knowledge (KIRK) Act, which prohibits public postsecondary institutions from restricting non-commercial expressive activities to designated and establishes statutory civil damages starting at $500 for violations. The bill authorizes students and student associations to exercise political and ideological beliefs without institutional discrimination regarding benefits or leadership requirements, while amending existing statutes K.S.A. 60-5311, 60-5312, and 60-5313.

Why it matters

Public universities and their agents would lose sovereign immunity from suit for expressive rights violations, making institutions directly liable for minimum statutory damages of $500 plus $50 per day of continuing non-compliance, alongside mandatory attorney fees.

Background
  • The measure builds upon existing Kansas statutes (K.S.A. 60-5311 through 60-5313) originally enacted to protect religious student associations on public university campuses. context
  • The bill references national debates surrounding campus free speech and invokes landmark Supreme Court precedent regarding public universities as the marketplace of ideas. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Students and Student Associations

Students and recognized associations gain explicit public forum protections in outdoor campus areas, the right to maintain ideological leadership requirements without losing institutional benefits, and a direct civil cause of action for violations.

Directly affected

Postsecondary Educational Institutions

Public universities lose sovereign immunity regarding expressive rights violations, must abolish free speech zones, are subject to mandatory reporting requirements, and face minimum statutory damages and legal fees for non-compliance.

Directly affected

Campus Administrators and Faculty

Individuals responsible for student discipline or education must undergo training on institutional free expression policies and ensure compliance with statutory reporting rules.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can universities require student groups to abandon ideological leadership requirements?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits universities from taking adverse action or denying benefits to religious, political, or ideological student associations that require their members or leaders to adhere to the group's sincerely held beliefs, values, or missions.
What damages can an individual recover if their campus free speech rights are violated?
Aggrieved individuals or the attorney general can sue for injunctive relief, attorney fees, court costs, and statutory damages of at least $500 for the initial violation plus $50 for each day the violation continues.
Are universities allowed to set up designated free speech zones?
No. The legislation explicitly states that postsecondary educational institutions shall not create or other designated areas outside of which expressive activities are prohibited in outdoor areas of campus.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026House
    Died in House Committee
  2. Mar 11, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Received and Introduced
  3. Mar 11, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Education
  4. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Now working on
  5. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Motion to Amend - Offered by
  6. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Amendment by was rejected
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Be passed
  2. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    fa_fabc_912
  3. Mar 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Emergency Final Action - Passed
  4. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Withdrawn from and referred to Committee of the Whole
  5. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Withdrawn from Calendar; Referred to Senate Committee on Ways and Means
  6. Feb 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed by
  7. Feb 4, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 1:30 PM — Room 144-S
  8. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Education
  9. Jan 28, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Expansion of Student Association Protections

The bill broadens existing religious student association protections under K.S.A. 60-5312 to explicitly encompass political and ideological student associations.

Connected Entities

Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk, University of Kansas School of Law and 3 more
OrganizationTurning Point USA“Student movement organization founded in 2012.”Map →
PersonCharlie Kirk“Founder of Turning Point USA and subject of legislative findings regarding campu”Map →
OrganizationUniversity of Kansas School of Law“Mentioned in legislative findings regarding past speaker suppression incidents.”Map →
locationUtah Valley University“Location of an event involving Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025.”Map →
PersonErika Kirk“Recipient of legislative condolences.”Map →
locationKansas State University“Site of a campus speaking event on September 13, 2024.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record