Pearl Harbor Investigation: Congressional Hearing Transcript (Part 11)
July 20, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The document provides the official historical record of the federal government's inquiry into the intelligence and military failures that preceded the United States' entry into World War II.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
United States Military Personnel
The testimony and findings of the committee directly impacted the careers and reputations of military officers involved in the defense of Pearl Harbor.
U.S. Government Officials
Executive and military leadership were subject to scrutiny regarding intelligence handling and decision-making prior to the attack.
Last recorded activity July 20, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The document is Part 11 of a multi-part series of hearings conducted by the Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack.
- The investigation was authorized by S. Con. Res. 27.
- The hearings took place during the first and second sessions of the 79th Congress.
- The committee was tasked with investigating the facts and circumstances related to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this document?
Who conducted this investigation?
Why It Matters
The document provides the official historical record of the federal government's inquiry into the intelligence and military failures that preceded the United States' entry into World War II.
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Post-War Accountability
The investigation represents a significant effort by the legislative branch to assert oversight over military intelligence and executive decision-making following a major national security failure.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance95How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools