POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

International Maritime Pollution Accountability Act of 2024

Record date · December 17, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill proposes new fees on large cargo ships based on their carbon emissions and air pollution levels while operating in U.S. waters. The revenue collected would fund grants and loans for port electrification, cleaner maritime technology, and workforce training.

Why it matters

If enacted, this bill would impose significant new operational costs on the global shipping industry while creating a multi-million dollar federal funding stream for port-adjacent communities and maritime infrastructure upgrades.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Maritime shipping operators

Must report voyage data and pay new carbon and air pollution fees.

Directly affected

Importers of record

Must report data and pay fees for cargo imported via qualified voyages, with risk of cargo seizure for non-payment.

Directly affected

Port-adjacent communities

May receive benefits from increased air monitoring and port electrification projects funded by the fee revenue.

Directly affected

Jones Act vessel owners

Eligible to apply for grants and loans to retrofit or replace vessels with zero-emissions technology.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ships are affected by these fees?
The fees apply to self-propelled cargo vessels of 10,000 gross tonnage or more that transport cargo to or from the United States.
What happens if a shipping company refuses to pay?
The Coast Guard is authorized to prohibit the operator from entering U.S. waters or docking at U.S. ports until all outstanding fees are paid.
How will the money collected be used?
The funds are earmarked for grants and loans to modernize the U.S. maritime fleet, research low-carbon fuels, support port workforce training, and improve air monitoring in port communities.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Polar Region Fee Multiplier

The bill explicitly triples carbon fees for voyages traveling north of 60°N or south of 60°S, signaling a specific policy focus on protecting Arctic and Antarctic environments.

Connected Entities

Takano, Matsui, International Maritime Organization and 3 more
PersonTakano“Representative Takano is a co-sponsor of the bill.”Map →
PersonMatsui“Representative Matsui is the bill's primary sponsor.”Map →
OrganizationInternational Maritime Organization“The IMO is referenced as failing to require emissions reductions.”Map →
OrganizationEnvironmental Protection Agency“The agency responsible for administering the bill's provisions.”Map →
bill numberClean Air Act“The Clean Air Act is referenced in the definition of 'covered voyage'.”Map →
PersonMullin“Representative Mullin is a co-sponsor of the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record