POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Kansas requires proponents to prove expert testimony is more likely than not helpful and reliable before trial

Original title: AN ACT concerning the rules of evidence; relating to testimony in the form of opinion; requiring a proponent to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that certain specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence before certain qualified witnesses may testify; amending K.S.A. 60-456 and repealing the existing section.

Last action · April 9, 2026: Enrolled and presented to Governor on Monday, March 30, 2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Kansas law now requires anyone offering expert witness testimony to demonstrate to the court that it is more likely than not that the expert's specialized knowledge, data, methods, and application will help the understand the evidence.

Why it matters

Litigants in Kansas courts face a stricter standard for admitting expert witness testimony, requiring formal proof of reliability and helpfulness before an expert may take the stand.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

litigants

Litigants must provide formal proof of an expert witness's reliability and helpfulness before testimony can be admitted in court.

Directly affected

expert witnesses

Expert witnesses are subject to stricter statutory admissibility requirements regarding their data, methods, and application.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a proponent prove before an expert witness can testify?
The must demonstrate to the court that it is more likely than not that the expert's specialized knowledge will help the , is based on sufficient data, is the product of reliable principles and methods, and reflects a reliable application of those methods to the case.
Does this law affect non-expert witnesses?
Yes, non-expert witnesses are limited to opinions or inferences that are rationally based on their perception, helpful to a clear understanding, and not based on scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

22 actions
  1. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Enrolled and presented to Governor on Monday, March 30, 2026
  2. Apr 9, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Approved by Governor on Tuesday, April 7, 2026
  3. Mar 26, 2026Senate
    Concurred with amendments in conference
  4. Mar 23, 2026Senate
    Nonconcurred with amendments; Conference Committee requested; appointed , and
  5. Mar 23, 2026HouseFloor
    Motion to accede adopted; Representative Humphries, Representative Williams, Representative Osman, , appointed as conferees
  6. Mar 18, 2026House
    Committee of the Whole - Now working on
Show 16 earlier actions
  1. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Committee Report be adopted
  2. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Be passed as amended
  3. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Motion to advance to Emergency Final Action adopted
  4. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Emergency Final Action - Passed as amended
  5. Mar 12, 2026HouseFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed as amended by
  6. Mar 3, 2026House
    Hearing: Tuesday, March 3, 2026, 3:30 PM — Room 582-N
  7. Feb 19, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Received and Introduced
  8. Feb 19, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Judiciary
  9. Feb 18, 2026Senate
    Committee of the Whole - Now working on
  10. Feb 18, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee of the Whole - Be passed
  11. Feb 18, 2026Senate
    fa_fabc_912
  12. Feb 18, 2026SenateFloor
    Emergency Final Action - Passed
  13. Feb 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee Report recommending bill be passed by
  14. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Hearing: Thursday, February 5, 2026, 10:30 AM — Room 346-S
  15. Jan 28, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Judiciary
  16. Jan 27, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Senate Committee on Judiciary
OrganizationSenate Committee on Judiciary“Legislative committee sponsoring SB 398”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record