The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.1976 Federal Nonnuclear Energy Research Authorization Hearings
Record date · July 14, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document records the Senate Subcommittee on Energy Research and Water Resources hearings regarding S. 598, a bill to authorize fiscal year 1976 for the Energy Research and Development Administration. The hearings focused on funding nonnuclear energy research as mandated by existing federal energy and atomic energy statutes.
This document outlines the legislative process for determining federal funding priorities for energy research during a period of reorganization in the mid-1970s.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Energy Research and Development Administration
The agency is the subject of the appropriations authorization bill.
Key Facts
- The hearings took place from March 3 to March 6, 1975.
- The bill S. 598 concerns fiscal year 1976 appropriations.
- The authorization is tied to requirements in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.
- The focus of the research funding is specifically on nonnuclear energy sources.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of S. 598?
What types of energy research does this bill cover?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Statutory Interdependence
The bill explicitly ties its funding authority to three distinct major energy statutes from 1954 and 1974, demonstrating a complex legal framework for energy research funding.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
