POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Iowa Senate Bill Authorizes Negotiations to Purchase Nine Minnesota Counties

Original title: A bill for an act authorizing a negotiation for the purchase of certain land from the state of Minnesota by the state of Iowa, and including effective date provisions.

Last action · April 8, 2025: Subcommittee: Bousselot, Petersen, and Zumbach. S.J. 736 .Sponsor: Mike Bousselot

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Iowa authorizes a three-member negotiating team to discuss acquiring nine southern Minnesota counties with the state of Minnesota, taking effect upon enactment.

Why it matters

Residents in nine southern Minnesota counties could see their state shift to Iowa if multi-state and federal approvals are met.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Residents of Rock, Nobles, Jackson, Martin, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, Fillmore, and Houston counties

Their geographic jurisdiction could be transferred from Minnesota to Iowa if all statutory and constitutional conditions are met.

Directly affected

State of Iowa

Appoints a negotiation team and would acquire new land, assume legal continuity, and require a constitutional amendment if an agreement proceeds.

Directly affected

State of Minnesota

Would be required to pass an act relinquishing and waiving jurisdiction over the specified counties.

Key Facts

  • The governor of Iowa shall appoint one Iowa resident, the senate majority leader shall appoint one senator, and the speaker of the house shall appoint one representative to form a three-person negotiating team.
  • The negotiating team is authorized to collectively negotiate with Minnesota for the purchase of nine specific Minnesota counties: Rock, Nobles, Jackson, Martin, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, Fillmore, and Houston.
  • Any negotiated agreement must accept existing Minnesota record title for lands and allow pending lawsuits concerning those lands to be prosecuted to final judgment in Minnesota with full force and effect in Iowa.
  • An agreement is void unless approved by Acts of the Iowa general assembly, the Minnesota legislature, and the United States Congress.
Show all 6 facts
  • An agreement requires an Iowa appropriation to pay for the land if payment is required, and the passage of an Iowa constitutional amendment ratifying the new state boundaries.
  • The act takes effect immediately upon enactment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which specific counties are included in the proposed purchase from Minnesota?
The bill targets nine Minnesota counties: Rock, Nobles, Jackson, Martin, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, Fillmore, and Houston.
What approvals are required for any negotiated purchase agreement to become valid?
The agreement must be approved by Acts of the Iowa general assembly and the Minnesota legislature, an Act of Congress, an Iowa appropriation for payment if required, and an Iowa constitutional amendment ratifying the new boundaries.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 8, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee: Bousselot, Petersen, and Zumbach. S.J. 736 .
  2. Apr 8, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Appropriations. S.J. 720 .
  3. Feb 20, 2025Senate
    Subcommittee: Bousselot, Bisignano, and Rozenboom. S.J. 328 .
  4. Feb 18, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to State Government. S.J. 295 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Fillmore, Rock, Freeborn and 8 more
locationFillmore“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationRock“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationFreeborn“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationState of Minnesota“The state neighboring Iowa whose southern counties are targeted for potential pu”Map →
locationMower“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationFaribault“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationMartin“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationHouston“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationJackson“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →
locationState of Iowa“The state authorizing negotiations to acquire land.”Map →
locationNobles“Minnesota county included in the negotiation authorization.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment25
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record