POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Iowa Senate File 517 Requires School Employee Child Abuse Reporting, Mandatory Leave, and License Revocation

Original title: A bill for an act relating to child abuse and employees and agents of public schools and nonpublic schools.(Formerly SF 221 .)

Last action · June 16, 2025: Referred to Education. S.J. 1057 .

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate File 517 includes public and nonpublic school employees and agents under Iowa's legal definition of a person responsible for the care of a child, requiring mandatory reporting of alleged child abuse to health agencies and law enforcement. The bill mandates that school districts place accused employees on administrative leave during assessments and terminate their employment upon a founded finding of child abuse, while requiring the Board of Educational Examiners to deny or revoke licenses for substantiated offenders.

Why it matters

School district employees and agents face mandatory administrative leave, property bans during abuse assessments, automatic termination upon founded abuse findings, and permanent professional license revocation, while public and nonpublic schools must institute formal reporting and investigative procedures.

Background
  • Iowa code section 232.68 establishes definitions related to child in need of assistance and child abuse reporting. context
  • The Board of Educational Examiners licenses practitioners and oversees professional ethics and standards for educators in Iowa public and nonpublic schools. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public school employees and agents

Public school employees are newly classified as persons responsible for the care of a child, subject to mandatory administrative leave during investigations, employment termination upon founded abuse, and license revocation.

Directly affected

Nonpublic school employees and agents

Nonpublic school employees face mandatory administrative leave during abuse assessments, employment termination upon founded abuse findings, and reporting requirements.

Directly affected

Public school districts and nonpublic school authorities

School authorities must prescribe handling procedures for abuse reports, assist health departments, place accused staff on administrative leave, and terminate employees upon receiving founded abuse notices.

Directly affected

Board of Educational Examiners

The board receives child abuse assessment results, gains access to disposition data for licensees, and is mandated to deny or revoke licenses for individuals with founded abuse records.

Key Facts

  • Public and nonpublic school employees and agents are added to the statutory definition of 'a person responsible for the care of a child' for child abuse reporting.
  • Child protection workers are granted confidential access to interview children in public, private, or nonpublic schools during assessments.
  • Children aged 10 or older may terminate contact with a child protection worker by stating their wish to discontinue the contact.
  • The Department of Health and Human Services must report child abuse assessment results to the Board of Educational Examiners if the alleged perpetrator holds a license or certificate from the board and the abuse is founded.
Show all 11 facts
  • School districts and nonpublic school authorities must receive notice from the department if an employee under their authority is the subject of a founded child abuse finding.
  • The Department of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Department of Education, must adopt rules prescribing handling procedures for child abuse reports involving school employees.
  • Schools must report alleged child abuse committed by employees to the Department of Health and Human Services and, if it constitutes a criminal act, to law enforcement.
  • The Board of Educational Examiners, school districts, and nonpublic school authorities are granted access to child abuse disposition data concerning current or prospective employees.
  • The Board of Educational Examiners must deny or revoke the license or certification of any person listed in the central registry for child abuse information or found to have committed child abuse in another jurisdiction.
  • School boards and nonpublic school authorities must place any employee or agent on administrative leave and prohibit them from entering school property during an ongoing child abuse assessment.
  • School boards and nonpublic school authorities must terminate the employment of any employee or agent who receives notice of a founded child abuse finding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to a school employee who is accused of child abuse?
The school board or nonpublic school authority must place the employee on administrative leave and prohibit them from entering school property while a child abuse assessment is ongoing.
Must schools report suspected abuse to law enforcement?
Yes, schools must report alleged child abuse committed by an employee to the Department of Health and Human Services, and also to law enforcement if the alleged act would constitute a criminal act harming a child.
What is the penalty if an employee is found to have committed child abuse?
School authorities must terminate the employee's employment upon receiving notice of a finding, and the Board of Educational Examiners must deny or revoke their professional license or certificate.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

34 actions
  1. Jun 16, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Education. S.J. 1057 .
  2. Jun 16, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Education. S.J. 1057 .
  3. Apr 3, 2025Senate
    Placed on calendar under unfinished business. S.J. 689 .
  4. Apr 3, 2025Senate
    Placed on calendar under unfinished business. S.J. 689 .
  5. Mar 21, 2025House
    Withdrawn. H.J. 772 .
  6. Mar 20, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Fiscal note.
Show 28 earlier actions
  1. Mar 20, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Read first time, attached to SF 517 . S.J. 602 .
  2. Mar 20, 2025House
    Message from House. S.J. 602 .
  3. Mar 20, 2025Senate
    Attached to HF 389 . S.J. 602 .
  4. Mar 20, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Fiscal note .
  5. Mar 19, 2025House
    Immediate message. H.J. 748 .
  6. Mar 19, 2025HouseFloor
    Passed House , yeas 96, nays 0. H.J. 747 .
  7. Mar 19, 2025HouseFloor
    Amendment H-1128 adopted, as amended. H.J. 747 .
  8. Mar 19, 2025HouseFloor
    Amendment H-1133 to amendment H-1128 filed, adopted. H.J. 747 .
  9. Mar 19, 2025House
    Amendment H-1091 withdrawn. H.J. 747 .
  10. Mar 18, 2025House
    Amendment H-1128 filed. H.J. 721 .
  11. Mar 17, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Fiscal note.
  12. Mar 17, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Fiscal note.
  13. Mar 14, 2025House
    Amendment H-1091 filed. H.J. 660 .
  14. Mar 5, 2025Senate
    Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 517 . S.J. 423 .
  15. Mar 5, 2025Senate
    Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 423 .
  16. Mar 5, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 417 .
  17. Feb 20, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee recommends amendment and passage.
  18. Feb 17, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee Meeting: 02/20/2025 10:00AM Room 315.
  19. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, placed on calendar. H.J. 318 .
  20. Feb 13, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 389 .
  21. Feb 11, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee: Salmon, Campbell, and Zimmer.
  22. Feb 11, 2025House
    Committee vote: Yeas, 23. Nays, 0. H.J. 295 .
  23. Feb 11, 2025House
    Committee report, recommending passage. H.J. 295 .
  24. Feb 10, 2025Iowa Legislature
    Subcommittee recommends passage.
  25. Feb 6, 2025House
    Subcommittee Meeting: 02/10/2025 12:00PM House Lounge.
  26. Feb 6, 2025House
    Subcommittee: Boden, Kniff McCulla and Wessel-Kroeschell. H.J. 264 .
  27. Feb 5, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Education. S.J. 202 .
  28. Jan 30, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, referred to Education. H.J. 155 .

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

2 patterns noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Inclusion of School Staff as Care Providers

The legislation broadens the traditional legal scope of a 'person responsible for the care of a child' to explicitly incorporate school employees and agents.

cross reference95% confidence

Successor Legislation from SF 221

Senate File 517 was introduced as a successor to Senate File 221, refining child abuse reporting and school employee procedures.

Connected Entities

Board of Educational Examiners, Department of Health and Human Services, General Assembly of the State of Iowa
OrganizationBoard of Educational Examiners“Maintains professional licensing and revokes credentials for founded abuse”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Health and Human Services“Receives child abuse reports and conducts assessments”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Iowa“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.iowa.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record