California AB 1883 prohibits employers from using AI-powered neural…

Where This Stands

Currently Unknown. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.

Version history & redline

5 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 5 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing 04/13/26 - Amended Assembly → 05/18/26 - Amended Assembly

removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

pdf extract failed: Invalid PDF structure.

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

The Frame

What this does

The bill establishes a statewide standard for workplace privacy by restricting the use of biometric and emotional AI tracking, impacting how employers monitor staff and potentially limiting the deployment of specific surveillance technologies in the workplace.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Employers

Employers are prohibited from using specific AI surveillance tools and face civil penalties for non-compliance.

Employees

Employees are protected from the collection of neural data and emotional state recognition by their employers.

Labor Commissioner

The Labor Commissioner is granted new authority to enforce the bill's provisions.

What changed

Last recorded activity August 30, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill prohibits employers, including government entities and the University of California, from using artificial intelligence tools to collect or analyze an employee's emotional state. Employers found in violation face civil penalties of up to $500 per incident, with enforcement authority granted to the Labor Commissioner or public prosecutors.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to public sector employers?

Yes, the bill explicitly defines 'employer' to include governmental entities, , and the University of California.

Are there any exceptions to the ban on AI surveillance?

Yes, employers may use these tools if they are reasonably necessary to comply with federal laws or contracts related to national security, defense, military, space, or aircraft development.

Who is responsible for enforcing these rules?

The Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor may enforce the provisions of the bill.

Why It Matters

The bill establishes a statewide standard for workplace privacy by restricting the use of biometric and emotional AI tracking, impacting how employers monitor staff and potentially limiting the deployment of specific surveillance technologies in the workplace.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Related Legislation

State Bill