Annette Sweeney

The 30-second read · every claim links to its source

141 roll-call votes on record - 124 yes, 9 no; these state roll calls carry no party-by-party tally. state roll calls
Serves as State Senator, District 27 (Iowa) since Jan 2023. github.com ↗

What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps

What we don’t cover yet

Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.

The record

official roll calls · every vote links to the bill

141

Roll-call votes on record.

141 votes · 124 yes · 9 no · 8 absent. These roll calls don’t record a party-by-party tally, so there’s no party-alignment rate to show - the votes themselves are below. official roll calls · Apr 29, 2026

LATEST: YESA bill for an act relating to animal torture, and providing penalties. (Formerly HF 557 .) Effective date: 07/01/2026.HF 2348 · Apr 29, 2026

← Back to overview

Personal finances

official financial-disclosure filings - originals one click away

View timeline Compare

Official personal financial-disclosure records are available in the comparison experience, with each figure linked to its filing.

← Back to overview

Political placement

third-party academic estimates - never our verdict

Left–right estimates (academic)

Shor-McCarty · votesConservative

More conservative than 83% of Iowa Senate members

Details

Score+0.80 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom roll-call votes

Party median0.11 more conservative than the Republican median in this group (+0.69)

Compared with194 members of Iowa Senate members (1993–2022)

Covers2009–2022

● This person Democrats (83) Republicans (110)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗

DIME CFscore · donorsVery Conservative

More conservative than 72% of 2022 Iowa Senate candidates

Details

Score+1.19 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom campaign donors

Party median0.01 more liberal than the Republican median in this group (+1.20)

Compared with100 members of 2022 Iowa Senate candidates

Covers2008–2022

● This person Democrats (44) Republicans (52)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗

About these scores

These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.

← Back to overview

Connections

people, money, orgs as one graph - every chip is a portal

Elsewhere in the graph

Explore Annette Sweeney's connection map →

← Back to overview

Quick facts 4 on file

Office & contact

Data sources 1 on file

Track Annette

The record

Personal finances

Political placement

Left–right estimates (academic)

Connections

Share or embed this record