Justin Bamberg

The 30-second read · every claim links to its source

Latest coverage: “Alabama lawmakers pass plan for new US House primary if courts allow different districts” (Florida Politics, May 9, 2026) - one of 6 stories across the spectrum (Left 2 · Center 2 · Right 2). coverage, lean labeled ↗
Serves as State Representative, District 90 (South Carolina) since Nov 2014. github.com ↗

What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps

What we don’t cover yet

Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.

Personal finances

official financial-disclosure filings - originals one click away

View timeline Compare

Official personal financial-disclosure records are available in the comparison experience, with each figure linked to its filing.

← Back to overview

Political placement

third-party academic estimates - never our verdict

Left–right estimates (academic)

Shor-McCarty · votesLiberal

More liberal than 92% of South Carolina House members

Details

Score−0.80 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom roll-call votes

Party median0.32 more liberal than the Democratic median in this group (−0.48)

Compared with418 members of South Carolina House members (1993–2022)

Covers2015–2022

● This person Democrats (152) Republicans (264)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗

DIME CFscore · donorsLiberal

More liberal than 77% of 2022 South Carolina House candidates

Details

Score−0.56 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom campaign donors

Party median0.14 more conservative than the Democratic median in this group (−0.70)

Compared with239 members of 2022 South Carolina House candidates

Covers2014–2022

● This person Democrats (76) Republicans (161)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗

About these scores

These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.

← Back to overview