Rachael Cabral-Guevara

Serves as State Senator, District 19 (Wisconsin) since Jan 2023. github.com ↗

Too little is on file for a sourced summary; the record on file is organized in the chapters.

What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps

What we don’t cover yet

Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.

Personal finances

official financial-disclosure filings - originals one click away

View timeline Compare

Official personal financial-disclosure records are available in the comparison experience, with each figure linked to its filing.

← Back to overview

Political placement

third-party academic estimates - never our verdict

Left–right estimates (academic)

Shor-McCarty · votesConservative

More conservative than 63% of Wisconsin Assembly members

Details

Score+0.71 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom roll-call votes

Party median0.08 more liberal than the Republican median in this group (+0.79)

Compared with352 members of Wisconsin Assembly members (1995–2022)

Covers2021–2022

● This person Democrats (152) Republicans (198)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗

DIME CFscore · donorsConservative

More liberal than 61% of 2022 Wisconsin Senate candidates

Details

Score+0.95 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom campaign donors

Party median0.24 more liberal than the Republican median in this group (+1.19)

Compared with62 members of 2022 Wisconsin Senate candidates

Covers2020–2022

● This person Democrats (22) Republicans (40)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗

About these scores

These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.

← Back to overview

Quick facts 4 on file

Office & contact

Track Rachael

Personal finances

Political placement

Left–right estimates (academic)

Share or embed this record