Tina Tartaglione

Serves as State Senator, District 2 (Pennsylvania) since Jan 1995. github.com ↗

Too little is on file for a sourced summary; the record on file is organized in the chapters.

What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps

What we don’t cover yet

Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.

Personal finances

official financial-disclosure filings - originals one click away

View timeline Compare

Official personal financial-disclosure records are available in the comparison experience, with each figure linked to its filing.

← Back to overview

Political placement

third-party academic estimates - never our verdict

Left–right estimates (academic)

Shor-McCarty · votesVery Liberal

More liberal than 94% of Pennsylvania Senate members

Details

Score−1.06 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom roll-call votes

Party median0.28 more liberal than the Democratic median in this group (−0.78)

Compared with143 members of Pennsylvania Senate members (1996–2022)

Covers1996–2022

● This person Democrats (57) Republicans (85)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗

DIME CFscore · donorsLiberal

More liberal than 68% of 2022 Pennsylvania Senate candidates

Details

Score−0.60 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom campaign donors

Party median0.21 more conservative than the Democratic median in this group (−0.81)

Compared with84 members of 2022 Pennsylvania Senate candidates

Covers1998–2022

● This person Democrats (37) Republicans (45)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗

About these scores

These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.

← Back to overview

Quick facts 4 on file

Office & contact

Track Tina

Personal finances

Political placement

Left–right estimates (academic)

Share or embed this record