Mark Sanford

The 30-second read · every claim links to its source

Latest coverage: “Sen. Darline Graham wins the Republican Senate primary runoff in South Carolina” (NBC Miami Politics, Aug 26, 2026) - one of 19 stories across the spectrum (Left 3 · Center 14 · Right 2). coverage, lean labeled ↗
Serves as State Representative (North Dakota) since Dec 2010. github.com ↗

What we don’t cover yet 1 gaps

What we don’t cover yet

Campaign finance filings for this office aren’t wired in yet - when they’re sourced, they’ll appear here.

Personal finances

official financial-disclosure filings - originals one click away

View timeline Compare

Official personal financial-disclosure records are available in the comparison experience, with each figure linked to its filing.

← Back to overview

Political placement

third-party academic estimates - never our verdict

Left–right estimates (academic)

Shor-McCarty · votesCenter-Right

More liberal than 64% of North Dakota House members

Details

Score+0.40 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom roll-call votes

Party median0.30 more liberal than the Republican median in this group (+0.70)

Compared with281 members of North Dakota House members (1997–2022)

Covers2011–2022

● This person Democrats (82) Republicans (199)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Shor, Boris. 2025. "Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data, January 2025 Update." Harvard Dataverse, V1. Method: Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3). Shor-McCarty ↗

DIME CFscore · donorsVery Conservative

More conservative than 60% of 2018 North Dakota House candidates

Details

Score+1.01 on a −2.5 to +2.5 scale

BasisFrom campaign donors

Party median0.08 more liberal than the Republican median in this group (+1.09)

Compared with95 members of 2018 North Dakota House candidates

Covers2010–2018

● This person Democrats (37) Republicans (57)Thick bar: middle half · thin line: middle 80%

Bonica, Adam. 2024. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 4.0. Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime DIME CFscore ↗

About these scores

These are third-party academic estimates of one left–right dimension, computed by researchers from roll-call votes or campaign donors. They are not Poliscope’s judgment. Each source uses its own scale, so compare people within a source rather than across sources.

← Back to overview