The public record
Wednesday, May 18, 2022 · Government meeting record
The 30-second read
Recorded outcomeWhy it matters
The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.
What happens next
No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.
4 statements
Commented on the grade of the site, existing block wall to the east, the status of street improvements along Medical Center Drive, the process of determining if additional fire hydrants are required for the project, and clerical revisions to Planning conditions #14 regarding solar rooftop and #17 regarding the approval date.
Official recordCommented on clerical revisions to Planning conditions #14 and #17, adding an Engineering COA to require an assessment of the block wall and repair the wall as needed prior to occupancy, and his approval for the variance due to the constraints of the site.
Official recordCommented on the site access for alternative #2 requested by Staff, the width of the truck driveway along Indian Ave, and the need for employee amenities.
Official recordCommented on the State of the City event and thanked Staff for the projects presented.
Official recordCommented on Medical Center Drive.
Commissioner Staff
Commented on the grade of the site, existing block wall to the east, the status of street improvements along Medical Center Drive, the process of determining if additional fire hydrants are required for the project, and clerical revisions to Planning conditions #14 regarding solar rooftop and #17 regarding the approval date.
Commissioner Chair Hammond
Commented on the integrity of the existing wall, additional traffic generated from the project, privacy with the development, and the limited number of parking spaces.
Commissioner Cynthia Ascencio from the Public
Commented on the integrity of the retaining wall, traffic concerns, and privacy with the development.
Commissioner Alana Salazar from the Public
Commented on potentially having the applicant work with the adjacent home owners to the east regarding the existing block wall.
Commissioner Staff
Commented on the requirements for a speed bump and creating a 4-way intersection.
Commissioner Deputy Engineer Pourkazemi
Commented on a study on the wall's structural integrity.
Commissioner Commissioner Jimenez asked if a condition could be included for the applicant to determine if a four-way stop should be installed at Medical Center and Flame Drive to reduce traffic speed in this area and
Commented on adding a condition for assessing the wall before and after construction of the project to determine if repair of the block wall is required.
Commissioner Staff
Commented on the use of the garage and the parking spaces for the site and that this new development will block the view from the Pacific Community development to the west, and that the higher windows along the eastern elevation will maintain privacy.
Commissioner Commissioner Gomez
Commented on the integrity of the block wall, and that the design of the eastern elevation would negate privacy concerns, the constraints for the site, and adding a condition that nothing can be attached or fixed to the block wall on the west side and a condition to determine if a speed bump is feasible along Medical Center Drive.
Commissioner Vice Chair Shively
Commented on clerical revisions to Planning conditions #14 and #17, adding an Engineering COA to require an assessment of the block wall and repair the wall as needed prior to occupancy, and his approval for the variance due to the constraints of the site.
Commissioner Chair Hammond
Commented on the additional documents provided to the Commissioners.
Commissioner Staff
Commented on a small portion of the warehouse development within the less restrictive flight path zone and requested alterations to the elevations to match the adjacent industrial development along Ramona Expressway and Indian Avenue.
Commissioner Commissioner Jimenez
Commented on the site access for alternative #2 requested by Staff, the width of the truck driveway along Indian Ave, and the need for employee amenities.
Commissioner Chair Hammond
Commented on the truck route, restrictions of the airport overlay zone, and additional employee amenities.
Commissioner Applicant Mike Naggar presented to the Commission and
Commented on the drainage improvements proposed with the project.
Commissioner Civil Engineer Chris Morgan
Commented on why residents were not contacted about the potential uses for the site.
Commissioner Applicant Mike Naggar
Commented on the feasibility of commercial development on the site.
Commissioner Applicant Mike Naggar
Commented on the access restrictions and building square footage and how these limit the feasible commercial tenants.
Commissioner Owner Mark Burger
Commented on the feasibility of access from Ramona Expressway.
Commissioner Applicant Mike Naggar
Commented on his support for the project and that it will help the local union workers and benefit the community.
Commissioner Al Sanchez from Laborers' International Unions of Northern America (LiUNA)
Commented on his approval for the project and that projects like this benefit local union members and help improve their standards of living.
Commissioner Jayson Baiz from LiUNA
Commented on the need to develop this site as it has been vacant for 20 years.
Commissioner John Bradshaw from the SWRCC
Commented on the difficulty of reviewing this project, as the alternative #2 project was not considered for comparison, and the project does not meet the City's best interest.
Commissioner Commissioner Gomez
Commented on his concern for the rezoning to light industrial, the limited area of commercial area along Ramona Expressway, and that he approved of Staff's recommendation for alternative #2.
Commissioner Commissioner Lopez approved of the elevations of the project and
Commented on the diversity of the Commission and that the improvement of the City is their primary goal.
Commissioner Commissioner Gomez
Commented on running the 5k health run and attending the City Health fair.
Commissioner Commissioner Lopez thanked Staff for listening to the requests of the Commission and
Commented on the end of the school year, the new KFC development, and the State of the City event on May 19th.
Commissioner Commissioner Jimenez
Commented on the upcoming State of the City event on May 19th.
Commissioner Vice Chair Shively
Commented on the State of the City event and thanked Staff for the projects presented.
Commissioner Chair Hammond
Commented on the upcoming State of the City event on May 19th, the upcoming development projects in the City, ICSC Conference for commercial development, and the next Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 1st.
Commissioner Director of Development Services Phung
No recording or transcript is held for this meeting.
Planning Commission
CITY OF PERRIS
MINUTES:
Date of Meeting:
May 18, 2022
06:07 PM
Place of Meeting:
City Council Chambers
Commission Members Present: Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Jimenez, Commissioner Gomez, Vice Chair Shively, and Chairman Hammond.
Staff Members Present: None.
-->
1.
CALL TO ORDER:
2.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Lopez, Jimenez, Gomez,
Chair Hammond, Vice-Chair Shively
Commission Members Present: Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Jimenez, Commissioner Gomez, Vice Chair Shively, and Chairman Hammond.
Staff Members Present: None.
-->
3.
INVOCATION:
4.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lopez
5.
PRESENTATION:
6.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
A.
Planning Commission Minutes for April 20, 2022
The Chair called for a motion.
M/S/C: Moved by Commissioner Jimenez, seconded by Vice Chair Shively to Approve Planning Commission Minutes for April 20, 2022
AYES:
Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Jimenez, Commissioner Gomez, Vice Chair Shively, Chairman Hammond.
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
7.
PUBLIC HEARING:
A.
Development Plan Review 21-00012 and Variance 21-05196 – A proposal to develop six townhomes consisting of two detached homes and two sets of attached homes with a reduced front yard setback due to an irregular shaped narrow lot on .46 acre located at the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Medical Center Drive within the Multi-Family Residential (MFR-14) zone. Applicant: Ivano Stamegna for Nova Homes, Inc
Planning Commission
CITY OF PERRIS
MINUTES:
Date of Meeting:
May 18, 2022 06:07 PM
Place of Meeting:
City Council Chambers
Commission Members Present: Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Jimenez, Commissioner Gomez, Vice Chair Shively, and Chairman Hammond.
1.
CALL TO ORDER:
2.
ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Lopez, Jimenez, Gomez, Chair Hammond, Vice-Chair Shively
Commission Members Present: Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Jimenez, Commissioner Gomez, Vice Chair Shively, and Chairman Hammond.
3.
INVOCATION:
4.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lopez
5.
PRESENTATION:
6.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
A.
Planning Commission Minutes for April 20, 2022
The Chair called for a motion.
M/S/C: Moved by Commissioner Jimenez, seconded by Vice Chair Shively to Approve Planning Commission Minutes for April 20, 2022
AYES:
Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Jimenez, Commissioner Gomez, Vice Chair Shively, Chairman Hammond.
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
7.
PUBLIC HEARING:
A.
Development Plan Review 21-00012 and Variance 21-05196 - A proposal to develop six townhomes consisting of two detached homes and two sets of attached homes with a reduced front yard setback due to an irregular shaped narrow lot on .46 acre located at the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Medical Center Drive within the Multi-Family Residential (MFR-14) zone. Applicant: Ivano Stamegna for Nova Homes, Inc REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 22-12 finding the project exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32 In-fill development, and approving Development Plan Review (DPR) 21-00012, and Variance (VAR) 21-05196, based on the findings contained in the Resolution and attached exhibits and Conditions of Approval.
Commissioners Shively and Jimenez acknowledged that they attended a previous AdHoc meeting regarding this project.
Commissioner Jimenez, Lopez, Gomez, and Hammond acknowledged that they drove by the site prior to the meeting.
Staff clarified a clerical revision to the requested action.
Assistant Planner Griffiths presented the item to the Commission.
Commissioner Lopez asked for the reasoning for the 15ft front yard setback reduction and if front yard setback adjustments have been applied to other developments.
Vice Chair Shively asked for clarification on what type of landscaping will be utilized in the rear yards and the location of the eastern property line.
Official pages
Records considered
Not claimed by this page
No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.
Canonical record: ec1fcfafbd38067e2f14f8417bc46cc0. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.
Publisher tools
