POLISCOPE

The public record

OAKLEY (CONTRACOSTA COUNTY)Decisions and attributed speech publishedPartial coverage

Oct 24, 2023 - 06:28 PM

Tuesday, October 24, 2023 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Oct 24, 2023 - 06:28 PM

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record and a transcript or captions are published for this meeting.

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Aug 3, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

This source published text without speaker turns, so speakers and timestamps are not shown.

>> SO HERE IS A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR FIRE DISTRICT. WE SPAN FROM DISCOVERY BAY IN THE EAST TO SAN PABLO IN THE WEST. OUR DISTRICT STARTED ITS FORMATION IN 1964 AND IT HAS CONTINUED TO GROW SINCE THEN. OUR LATEST EXPANSION WAS IN MARCH WITH THE CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WITH CITY OF PANOLA. WITH THAT EXPANSION, WE REOPENED STATION 74 WHICH HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR NEARLY A DECADE. WE NOW STAFF 34 STATIONS WITH 40 CREWS ACROSS THE COUNTY. THIS IS UP 3 CREWS FROM WHAT I REPORTED LAST MARCH. WE HAVE ADDED A TRUCK TO STATION 81 IN ANTIOCH. WE HAVE DEDICATED RESCUE NOW IN BAYPOINT AT STATION 86. AND WE NOW STAFF A WATER TENDER RIGHT HERE IN OAKLEY AT STATION 95. WE HAVE OVER 500 EMPLOYEES AND MORE THAN 250 SPECIALIZED VEHICLES. HERE IN OAKLEY, WE STAFF 2 FIRE STATIONS, STATION 93 JUST DOWN THE STREET WITH ONE CREW AND WE ALSO HAVE STATION 95 WITH ONE FULL CREW AND THEN WE DO NOW HAVE THAT WATER TENDER OPERATOR THIS IS OUR SPRING UPDATE. THIS IS WHAT I COVERED IN MARCH. WE'VE REPORTED THAT WE COMPLETED THE ANNEXATION OF EAST COUNTY AND WE ADDED PARAMEDIC SERVICES. TO ALL THE STATIONS OUT EAST. AGAIN, WE NOW SERVE THE CITIZENS OF PANOLA. CREW 12 IS STAFFED YEAR-ROUND. THAT'S OUR HAND CREW. MEASURE X FUNDS WERE USED TO START THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PROJECTS. WE REOPENED 3 FIRE STATIONS AND WE HAVE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THEE NEW FIRE STATIONS AS WELL. THE MEASURE X FUNDS ALSO ALLOWED US TO EXPAND OUR CREWS OUT IN THE STATIONS. THEY DID HELP FUND THAT RESCUE STATION. AND WE DID EXPAND OUR K-9 PROGRAM TO INCLUDE BAXTER, THE NEW K-9. SO WHAT'S NEW SINCE THEN? WE HAVE THE FIRST EVER OFFICIAL FIRE CHAPLAIN. HE ACTUALLY HAS BEEN AROUND THE AREA FOR QUITE AWHILE. AND WE HAVE USED HIS SERVICES UP TO THIS POINT, BUT HE IS NOW OFFICIAL, HAS A BADGE, AND HE HAS A PRETTY BIG ROLE IN OUR DEPARTMENT. WE ALSO HAVE A NEW TRANSPORT BUS FOR OUR HAND CREW, CREW 12. WE CALL IT A BUGGY. WE HAVE SEEN MULTIPLE PROMOTIONS TO BOTH ENGINEER AND CAPTAIN. OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS. WE HAVE ALSO ISSUED A FEW 20-PLUS YEAR SERVICE AWARDS. WE HAVE EXPANDED OUR TOWN HALL MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS LIKE THIS ONE. WE HAD ONE OF OUR ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEFS, CHIEF PETER DEPLOYED TO MAUI ON A FEMA MISSION. HE CAME BACK WITH SOME PRETTY AMAZING STORIES. WE DID HAVE OUR ANNUAL MATT AND SCOTT MEMORIAL SERVICE AND OUR ANNUAL FIRE FIGHTER MEMORIAL SERVICE ON SEPT 11TH AT STATION 11 IN CLAYTON. OKAY, SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CALLS IN OAKLEY. AND AGAIN, IT'S VERY HARD TO SEE. SO I HAVE A BIGGER VERSION AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU GUYS CAN'T SEE IT. THESE CALLS AND THESE NUMBERS ARE FOR OUR CALLS IN SEPTEMBER. WE HAD A TOTAL OF 373 CALLS FOR SERVICE IN THE CITY. THE BOTTOM GRAPH SHOWS WHAT OUR NUMBERS HAVE BEEN OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, 36 MONTHS. THEY RANGE ANYWHERE FROM 221 CALLS TO 397 CALLS PER MONTH. THAT'S AN AVERAGE OF 12 CALLS PER DAY WHICH WAS SPREAD OUT BETWEEN THE TWO STATIONS AND THEN NEIGHBORING STATIONS WHEN THEY NEED TO COME IN TO COVER. IF YOU TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT THE EMS CALLS, THEY ARE THE MOST COMMON, OF COURSE. THAT SEEMS TO BE THE CASE FOR MOST FIRE SERVICES. WE HAVE ADDED AN ADDITIONAL DATA POINT WHICH INCLUDES OUR NEW BLS AMBULANCE ONLY RESPONSES. WE'LL GO OVER THAT A LITTLE CLOSER ON THE NEXT SLIDE. >> SO THIS IS A BREAKDOWN OF OUR ANNUAL CALLS. ALSO HAVE WHAT IS NOW CALLED RESPONSE AMBULANCE RESPONSE TO THESE CALLS. WE DO HAVE A FEW MATURE RESPONSES WITH AN ENGINE . BUT SPECIFICALLY WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ON THE SLIDE IS JUST THE EMBLEMS ON CALLS . THE REASON WHY WE EXPANDED THIS SERVICE FOR AMBULANCES AS YOU KNOW , WE ARE HAVING A PRETTY BIG SHORTAGE OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS, NOT ALL OF THE HOSPITALS BY THE SERVICE. WE HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED TO KEEP UP WITH THE DEMAND FOR PARAMEDICS, AND IN ORDER TO STAFF AND BALANCES REQUIRE ONE PARAMEDIC. IT'S ABOUT HAVING THE AMBULANCE, THAT MEANS IT IS STAFFED WITH A LOCAL EMS AUTHORITY THAT CAN IDENTIFY YOUR STUDY AND IDENTIFY CERTAIN COAL TYPES, WHERE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR AN EMT TO PROVIDE CARE WAS APPROPRIATE. AND ALLOWS US TO DO STAFF OF QUITE A FEW ADDITIONAL INFLUENCES. WHAT THAT DOES IS THAT LEAVES THE BLS AND BLITZES AVAILABLE FOR THE CALLS. IF YOU LOOK AT THE CHART, IT SHOWS WHAT WE GOT WITH ENGLAND'S CALLS , GOT THE SIX 5150 PD REQUEST, FIVE OR ALS ONLY. 10 OR BLS ONLY, AND THAT NUMBER IS GOING TO INCREASE QUITE A BIT NEXT MONTH, BECAUSE WE WILL START WITH THIS BLS RESPONSE. FOUR EMS STANDBYS , A GRAND TOTAL OF 50 AMBULANCE IS PENCIL, GO BACK TO THE PREVIOUS SLIDE , THE 307 THREE CALLS FOR SERVICE, 58 MORE FOR EMBLEMS ONLY, AND THE REMAINDER WERE AGENTS. THAT INCLUDES THE EMS SECTION. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE EMS? SMACK ANY CONSEQUENCES? VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> SORRY FOR THE LAYMAN HERE, I DON'T KNOW WHAT BLS, EMS OF IN TWO IS BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS. >> SO BLS IS EMT AND ANOTHER CANTEEN, AND ALS IS EMT WITH A PARAMEDIC. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE. WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE BREAKOUT OF CALLS, WHICH WE DON'T USE OUR EMS OR THE EMS OPCODE TO SINCE THE 19, THIS WOULD JUST CALLS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED TO HAVE A BLS ONLY. SINCE THE 19th CHANGED QUITE A FEW THINGS, AND A CASSETTE , IT HAS HAD A REALLY BIG IMPACT ON OUR ABILITY TO GET A GLANCE TO THE SCENE OF CALLS MUCH QUICKER. >> COUNCIL MEMBER FULLER? >> IN MY PERSPECTIVE, IT LOOKS LIKE OVER THE 36 MONTH CALL VOLUME THERE HAS BEEN A SIGNIFICANT DROP IN CALLS. IS THAT BECAUSE OF FIRE PREVENTION OR? WHAT ATTRIBUTES THE DROP IN CALLS? OVER A THREE-YEAR PERIOD. >> SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE OVERALL CALLS, WHICH INCLUDES FIRES , RESCUES, VEHICLE ACCIDENTS , THOSE CALLS HAVE STRAYED RELATIVELY STABLE. 221 CALLS , 397. WE DO HAVE SOME SEASONAL CHANGE BASED ON FLU SEASON. IN THE WINTER MONTHS. BUT I THINK IF YOU'RE REFERRING TO IS THOSE AMULETS ONLY CALLS. >> THESE ARE EVIDENCE ONLY CALLS FOR THE CITY OF OAKLAND CALLS PERSPECTIVE CORRECT. SMACK RIGHT. SO, WE HAVE HAD A SHORTAGE OF IMPULSES RECENTLY, AND A LOT OF THE CALLS FOR SERVICE ENDED UP WITH A RESPONSE THAT INCLUDED THE ENGINE , BECAUSE THE AMULETS WERE DELAYED SO YOU SEE A DECREASE IN EVIDENCE ONLY CALLS BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD A DECREASE IN EPAULETS AVAILABILITY. BUT AS I SAID , IT HAS TO DO WITH THE BLS TO RESPONSE MODEL, AND OUR COMPLIANCE NUMBERS CHANGED RADICALLY IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS. >> IN QUEUE. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> OKAY, SO WE WILL MOVE TO THE WILDFIRE THREAT. WE REALLY EXPECTED TO SEE MORE FIRE ACTIVITY IN THE SUMMER THAN WHAT ACTUALLY OCCURRED. WE ARE CURRENTLY TRANSITIONING TO THE FALL /WINTER AND PATTERNS. AS YOU KNOW THE FIRE SEASON TENDS TO BE YEAR-ROUND IN THIS AREA. AND WE DID JUST RECENTLY HAVE A COUPLE OF SIGNIFICANT WILDFIRES THE PAST FEW WEEKS. THE MAP IN THE SLIDE SHOWS THE WILDFIRE HAZARD SEVERITY SHOWN. IT ONLY RATES THE STATE RESPONSE AREA , THE CITY VOCAL IS THE STATE 'S POSSIBILITY AREAS, SO IT IS NOT RATED. THERE ALSO WERE AREAS IN THE COUNTY WHICH ARE SHOWN IN RED WITH INCREASED THREAT. NO AREA OF THE COUNTY IS IMMUNE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF WILDFIRE IMPACTS. IF IT WISHES SMOKE, OR ASH , THE FIRE TOLD THE TEMPERED OAKLEY IS CONSIDERED TO HAVE MINIMAL THREAT. THE CLOSEST THREAT THAT IS CONSIDERED CONSIDERABLE WOULD BE TO THE SOUTH . YOU CAN SEE THAT BY THE MAP. THERE IS A QR LINK , IF YOU WANTED TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK TO SEE THE ZONES, AS I SAID IN PAST MARCH THIS MAP WAS CHANGED, THEY EXPANDED THE SEVERITY ZONES AND INCREASE THE THREAT. SO THAT IS THE QR CODE IF YOU WANTED TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT THAT. AS FAR AS WHAT WE HAVE FOR FIRE SAFETY FOR RESIDENTS, WE HAVE SEVERAL TOOLS AVAILABLE TO EXPLAIN DIFFERENT RISKS IN OUR COMMUNITY, WHICH INCLUDES CHECKLISTS, WHICH IN CAN HELP CITIZENS PREPARE FOR DIFFERENT EVENTS. LOOKS LIKE , THESE TOOLS ARE AVAILABLE BY USING A QR CODE, OR YOU CAN ACCESS >> ANY COUNSEL QUESTIONS? SAY NONE, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. AND I DON'T 1.4 PRESENTATION BY GARY PARKHURST, MOUNT DIABLO INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIATION REGARDING THE MITCHELL CANYON EDUCATIONAL CENTER. >> THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY , MR. MAYOR, THANK YOU. CITY COUNCIL, FOR THE TIME YOU'RE GETTING ME TO SHARE OUR VISION OF THE MITCHELL CANYON EDUCATION CENTER BUT AS A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN IN FOR MINUTES AND LOCAL. DIABLO INTERPRETER SHOWS THE LEADING CAMPAIGN TRANSITION FROM THE MITCHELL CANYON VACATION CENTER TO THE MITCHELL CANYON OF THE BIDDERS VISITOR CENTER TO THE MITCHELL CANYON OF THE CANYON. MY NAME IS GARY PARKHURST, IMA MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATION AND MITCHELL CANYON VISITOR CENTER. BEFORE I GET STARTED, I ALWAYS LIKED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANCESTRAL HOME OF FIVE INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS. CONFEDERATE VILLAGES TAKE TIME TO DISMEMBER. SO JUST A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEX AROUND MBIA. MBIA IS A COOPERATING AGENCY , ESSENTIALLY THAT MEANS WE WORK WITH THE PARK TO ENLIGHTEN AND EDUCATE VISITORS ON HOW TO USE AND ENJOY MOUNT DIABLO. FROM RAY RAY OF , FUNDING ARRAY THAT INCLUDES EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS , FOSTER THE APPRECIATION YOU ARE AN ALL VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION , AND IN 2020 OUR BOARD TOOK A LOOK AT THE SYNOD VISITOR CENTER. HAVE ANY OF YOU BEEN TO MITCHELL CANYON BEFORE? YOU WILL SEE OUR VISITOR CENTER IN COUPLE OF MINUTES, AND 20 THEY TOOK A LOOK AT DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS FEASIBLE LOOK A NEW VISITOR CENTER IN THE EDUCATION CENTER. PENETRABLE APPROVAL IS MADE, AND WE BEGAN OUR JURY --THERE WE GO. TOWARDS THAT. PRESERVATION EDUCATION , THAT IS OUR MISSION. THAT IS BECAUSE WE BELIEVE THAT IS HOW WE ENSURE THAT FUTURE GENERATIONS ENJOY WHAT WE CALL GAZE AT EVERY YEAR, EVERY DAY. BEAUTY, HISTORY , AND MYSTERY OF MOUNT DIABLO. SO WE ARE NOW IN YOU UNIQUE POSITION TO NOT ONLY EXPAND MOUNT DIABLO'S EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR EVERYONE , BUT TO HAVE A MORE PROFOUND AND LASTING POSITIVE IMPACT ON OUR COMMUNITY. AS WE TRANSITION TO EDUCATION CENTER. MITCHELL CANYON GETS CLOSE TO 34 TO 35,000 VISITORS PER YEAR FOR THE EDUCATION CENTER WILL INCREASE THAT ANCHOR OUR ESTIMATES. THEY COME TO THE PARK , TO THE EDUCATION, TO THE VISITORS CENTER FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS. THEY COME TO HIKE, AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF HIKES FROM VERY DIFFICULT TO VERY EASY. MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAILS, RUNNING TRAILS. I WAS WORKING THIS PAST SATURDAY AND THREE GROUPS RAN TO THE SUMMIT AND BACK. 3200 FEET ELEVATION I HAD SEVERAL FAMILIES TAKING ON THE PIPE THAT WE HAVE. A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT BUTTERFLIES, TARANTULAS. PEAK EXPIRATION, THERE IS A LOT TO DO IN MITCHELL CANYON, AND IF WE CAN VISITORS FROM ALL OVER THIS PAST SATURDAY I HAD VISITORS FROM SAN JOSE, PENINSULA , SOLANO OF COURSE ALAMEDA COUNTIES. SO, THIS IS OUR CURRENT VISITOR CENTER. I LIKE TO SAY IT IS A TEMPORARY AIR QUOTES 19-YEAR-OLD FACILITY. IT IS ONLY 400 SQUARE FEET. IT DOES HAVE A RENT, SINCE TECHNICALLY 88. HE PUT A WHEELCHAIR IN THEIR , THERE'S NOT ENOUGH ROOM FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE, CERTAINLY ROOM FOR CLASS. SO WHAT IS MISSING FROM OUR LITTLE 400 FOOT TRAILERS? TEMPORARILY PUT IN PLACE 19 YEARS AGO. WILL FIRST OF ALL, LARGER OF THE WORST THINGS. PART OF ME, LARGER INDOOR SPACE. INDOOR SPACE TO ALLOW US TO HAVE STATIONARY AND ROTATING EXHIBITS THAT MEET THE DISABILITY GUIDELINES AND SPEAK TO THE DIVERSE NATURES OF OUR VISITORS. AND TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THE FIRST TIME SCHOOL FIELD TRIPS. TODAY , SCHOOL BUSES CAN ACCESS MOUNT DIABLO BECAUSE THE ROADS ARE TOO WIDE. IF YOU ARE EVER AT NORTHGATE OR SOUTHGATE, BUT THE NEW EDUCATION CENTER WOULD ALLOW SCHOOLBUS FIELD TRIPS. A VISUAL CONNECTION WITH OUR NATIVE PLANT GARDEN. I WILL NOT GO INTO A LOT OF DETAIL ON THAT, BUT IF ANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN TO MITCHELL CANYON, WOULD BEST TO IF YOU HAD EVER KNOWN THERE WAS A NATIVE GARDEN, IN THE PUBLIC WOULD HAVE SAID NO BECAUSE IT IS BEHIND THE TRAILER, AND YOU CAN SEE IN THE NEW EDUCATION CENTER WILL RING A PHYSICAL CONNECTION WITH THE GARDEN. A LARGE COVERED OUTDOOR SPACE , BECAUSE TODAY THERE IS NO PLACE FOR GROUPS TO ME. WE GET MANY GROUPS EVERY WEEKEND FROM ACROSS THE BAY AREA. BUT THERE IS NO PLACE TO MAKE. SO MEET IN THE PARKING LOT, ON THE GRAVEL , THERE'S NO PLACE TO REST YOU GET BACK, THERE'S NO PLACE TO EDUCATE YOU IF YOU'RE VISITING MITCHELL CANYON ON THE WEEKDAYS. BUT IF YOU DECIDE TO HIKE MONDAY TO FRIDAY, THERE'S NOTHING THERE TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU CAN SEE. THE PAVILION FROM OUTER SPACE WOULD BE BASICALLY SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. SO, LET ME SHARE WITH YOU OUR VISION OF EDUCATION CENTER. THE NEW EDUCATION CENTER WILL BE A 1500 SQUARE FOOT A.D.A. COMPLIANT FACILITY , AND AN OUTDOOR PAVILION WITH A SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED ACCESS TO THE STATE PART FOR PEOPLE OF ALL BACKGROUND AND ALL ABILITIES, PARTICULARLY PUBLIC SCHOOLS. THE NEW EDUCATION CENTER WILL FOCUS , WOULD MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO ACCOMMODATE SCHOOL TRIPS AND SCHOOL BUSES FOR THE FIRST TIMES, THE CENTER WILL PROVIDE INDOOR AND OUTDOOR EDUCATION , AS WELL AS NATURAL HISTORY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES. THE INDOOR FACILITY WILL FEATURE STATE OF THE ART DISPLAYS AND HIGHLIGHT PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY FOUND ON MOUNT DIABLO. IT WILL AS WELL AS HISTORIC AND CURRENT RELATIONSHIPS WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLE. THE MEDIA ROOM FOR CLASSES AND ROTATING EXHIBITS. THE INTERIOR WILL FEATURE STATE OF THE ART DISPLAYS. AND AS I MENTIONED IN BOTH ROTATING AND STATIONARY EXHIBITS. THAT IS A VIEW OF THE PILLION, THE COVERED PLANS WOULD CREATE A SPACE FOR GROUPS TO ASSEMBLE FOR VISITOR ACCESS TO A LISTENERS CLOSE. THEY WILL GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY WILL SEE AS THEY GET READY TO HEAD OUT ON THEIR ACTIVITIES. THE DESIGN OF THE PLAZA WHERE THE SCHOOL BUSES WILL BE ABLE TO PULL UP RIGHT ON THE OF THE PAVILION. EMANATED GARDEN FOR FLORAL IN BOTANY. I WOULD LIKE SAY THINGS YOU'D WALK TO THE PLACARD BEFORE YOU GOT ON YOUR HEIGHT OR YOUR ACTIVITY, THERE'S A CHANCE FOR CC YOU'RE GOING TO SEE BEFORE YOU SEE IT. BECAUSE THERE'S ANYTHING THERE IS IN THE NATIVE PLANT GARDEN THAT IS ON THE MOUNTAIN. THIS IS NOT THE MOST INTERESTING OR EXCITING SLIDE C BUT IT IS A REALLY IMPORTANT ONE. BECAUSE WHAT IT DOES IS IT DEMONSTRATES THE PATIENT CENTER WOULD BE BILLED AS A MODEL FOR AN ENERGY EFFICIENT ENVIRONMENT FACILITY FOR URBAN WILDFIRE. ALL THE MATERIALS WE LOCATED AND SUPPLIED LOCALLY, AND TRAVAILING WINS TO CALL THE FACILITY, AND SUDDENLY TO LIGHT THE FACILITY. THERE WE GO, SO THAT IS IT, THAT IS MITCHELL CANYON EDUCATION CENTER. QUESTION THAT I HAVE FOR ALL ABUSE HOW CAN YOU HELP US. THERE ARE SEVERAL THINGS YOU CAN DO IF YOU ARE SO INCLINED, AND IF THIS PROJECT RESONATES WITH YOU. FIRST OF ALL, TO SUPPORT FOR US AS WE PURSUE GRANT REQUESTS TO HAVE CITY ENDORSEMENTS. SO TO THE DEGREE THAT THIS PROJECT RESONATES WITH THE COUNSEL, I WOULD ASK IF YOU COULD PROVIDE US WITH THE ENDORSEMENT FOR THE MITCHELL CANYON EDUCATION CENTER. YOU CAN ALSO HELP US WORK THE NEWSLETTERS AND WEBSITES, THE SOCIAL MEDIA. SOMEBODY MAY KNOW PEOPLE WHO THAT PROJECT WOULD RESONATE WITH. IF YOU NOTICE COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THEM WITH ME, I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE YOU DO THAT. PERSONALLY , IF THIS PROJECTS RESONATES WITH ANYONE AND IS LISTENING TO ME, YOU CAN JOIN OUR MAILING LIST, AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE IN THIS RESONATES WITH YOU WITH WHAT WE'RE TAUGHT TO DO, YOU CAN DO THAT ALSO. AT MBIA.ORG. SUFFERS TODAY , FIRST OF ALL LET YOU KNOW THAT I AM VERY APPRECIATIVE OF THE TIME YOU HAVE GIVEN ME I WILL TELL YOU THAT IN THE FIRST 10 MONTHS OF OUR CAMPAIGN WE HAVE RAISED $1.85 MILLION TO VISIT A $6 MILLION BULL EXPECT TO GET A 2 MILLION BY THE END OF THIS YEAR. IT WAS 32% OF OUR $6 MILLION , IT IS A VERY SMALL, HARD-WORKING ALL VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION. SO THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR TIME. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, GARY, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION >> OH, GOD. >> ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I SEE NONE, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. AND WE WILL SEE YOU IN ABOUT A WEEK OR SO. ITEM TWO, PUBLIC COMMENTS. AT THIS TIME, PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE HEARD FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. I HAVE ONE PUBLIC COMMENT CARD SUBMITTED . TO SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE COMPLETE A LOOSE STICKER CARD LOCATED IN THE LOBBY, AND SUBMIT TO THE CITY CLERK. THE TIME TO SPEAK IS THREE MINUTES, TIME-LIMITED IS MONITORED BY THE TIME LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THE REAR SEAT, WITH ONE MINUTE REMAINING ON THE TIMER, IT WILL BE A REMINDER TO COMPLETE, BEFORE YOUR TIME EXPIRES. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM ANY APPLAUSE, CHEERING, BOOING , OR OTHER ARBORISTS SO THAT EVERYONE MAY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. NOTE THAT DUE TO PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW , THE COUNCIL MAY NOT ENGAGE IN DIALOGUE REGARDING COMMENTS, STAFF MAY BE DIRECTED TO RESPOND TO PERSONS MAKING PUBLIC COMMENTS. :03 WE ARE ALREADY TO GO, RIGHT? :06 >> :07 THAT WAS QUITE THE DISCLAIMER. HI, :12 MAYOR, COUNCIL , CITY MANAGER :15 McMURRAY AND STAFF. MY NAME IS :18 DON, I AM A RESIDENT LOCALLY :20 I LIVE HERE IN VINTAGE PARKWAY, AND I :22 JUST FIRST, I KNOW THAT AS COUNSEL YOU :24 GET A LOT OF :30 NEGATIVE THINGS THROWN :31 AT YOU, AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THROW :33 SOME POSITIVES AT YOU. :35 NUMBER ONE IS THE IMPROVEMENT IN LANDSCAPING :36 AND CABINETS ARE PARKWAY. :39 THE OVERPASS , WE :40 DON'T WANT TO IGNORE THAT THAT IS HAPPENING AND :42 WE APPRECIATED, AND UNDERSTAND :45 THE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS THERE. :48 AND THE ONLY OTHER THING :49 I HAVE IS THE CHAIRS. I AM PROBABLY ONE OF :51 THE MOST SET :54 AND CO-CHAIR PEOPLE IN THIS COUNCIL ROOM, AND IT'S WHAT TO SAY I APPRECIATE IT, BECAUSE MY BACK WAS KILLING MY BACK WAS KILLING ME WITH THOSE OLD CHAIRS. SO IT REALLY DOES IMPROVE MY LIFE, AND I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, DON. A LITTLE DIFFERENT MOMENT. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS? ITEM THREE, CONSENT CALENDAR. ARE THERE ANY ITEMS THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO PULL? I HAVE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS, ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR? SEEING NONE. ANY ITEMS? IS THERE MOTION FOR APPROVAL? >> I WILL MOVE APPROVAL. >> IS THERE SECOND? >> SECOND. SPENT ALL IN FAVOR. >> I. SPEC OPPOSED? YOU OKAY, COUNSEL FOR FULLER? ITEM FOUR, PUBLIC HEARINGS. 4.1 , AMEND AND RESTATE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF OAKLEY TO JOIN THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES AND FOR STRUCTURE PROGRAMS. >> ANYTHING, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, SO FOR TONIGHT IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON OUR SKIN PROGRAM , AND THE CITY HAS BEEN DISSIPATED IN THE SKIP PROGRAMS OF 2010. AND SINCE STARTING TO DISSIPATE, WE HAVE DONE SEVEN EXTRA BOND DISTANCES. IT ALLOWS OWNERS OF PROPERTIES TO FINANCE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEES THROUGH A PULLED REVENUE ON FINANCING . AND TONIGHT'S REPORT IS JUST TO MODIFY THE PROGRAM TO ALLOW FINANCING THE FEES TO THE FORMATION OF THE CFD ADDITION TO WHAT WE ALREADY ALLOW, THIS ALLOWS FOR A BROADER RANGE OF FEES TO BE FINANCE AS WELL AS FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF ADJUSTING RENTS. I'M SORRY, RATES BASED ON PRODUCT TYPES. SO, BASICALLY IT ALLOWS DEVELOPERS TO APPLY THOSE RATES ACCORDING TO YOUR HOUSE SIZE VERSUS EQUALLY ACROSS THE BOARD. THE CITY IS NOT LIABLE FOR THE BONDS, OR FOR THE ASSESSMENT OR CFT'S. THE CSEA HANDLES ALL DISTRICT FORMATIONS , ADMINISTERS ALL BOND INITIATIVES. SO, WE ARE CONSCIOUS THE MIDDLEMAN TO MAKE SURE THAT IF IT IS AUDIT FOR IN A STRUCTURE WHERE THERE ARE OTHER LOOKING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE STRUCTURE IS NOT PUT IN, OBVIOUSLY BUT IS BOUND BONNIE FOR FEES, WE RECEIVED THOSE FEES AND SPEND THEM ON A PROJECT RELATED TO THIS FEES, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES, WE WOULD HAVE A HAVE A TRAFFIC PROJECT WITHIN THREE YEARS OF RECEIVING THE BOND FUNDING. TO PAY FOR THAT. STAFF TIME IS MINIMAL, AND THE CITY CAN ALSO COLLECT AN ADMISSION FEE ON THE STAFF TIME THAT WE DO SPEND. ON ANY OF THE SKIP FUNDING. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE AMEND THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO JOIN THE SKIP PROGRAM AND WE ALSO HAVE IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT, JAMES HAMEL, SO HE IS ABLE TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC OCEANS YOU MAY HAVE OF THE PROGRAM, OR I'M HERE TO ALSO ENTER PROGRAMS. WITH THAT , I'M HERE FOR QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU. COUNSEL FOR FULLER? >> MY UNDERSTANDING THE RESIDENCE IN THOSE TWO AREAS USE THIS , THE FINANCE , ET CETERA IN THERE. AND NOW , THE RESIDENTS ARE PAYING THE ASSESSMENT THE TO, I GUESS IT IS GOING TO COME IS THAT WHAT? >> THE ASSESSMENT PHASE BASED ON THE BONDS, SO DOES NOT GO TO THE DEVELOPER, IT PAYS THE BOND, SO THAT WAS BONDED FOR PARENTS BECAUSE THAT SHOW UP ON THERE? >> ON THE PROPERTY TAX LIKE ANY OTHER ASSESSMENT WOULD, SIMILAR TO THE CFE , IT WOULD SEE IT ON THEIR PROPERTY TASKS. >> WE HAVE VERY INDUSTRIOUS PEOPLE , BUT SOME OF THEM CAN BE LAID OFF FROM SICKNESS OR THINGS OF THAT NATURE. AND KERRY MORTGAGES, ET CETERA WITH THE BANK THAT OCCURS THE BANK WILL PAY IT BUT THEY WILL BECOME LIABLE DURING THAT TIME UNTIL THEY ARE BACK AND PLAYED AGAIN. HOW'S THAT GOING TO AFFECT THAT PROGRAM WHEN YOU HAVE AN ASSESSMENT FROM THE DEVELOPER TO SHOW IF YOU ARE OFF OR NOT? IS THERE ANYTHING THAT HAS A RECOURSE ON THAT? IT'S AN ETHICAL HAVE JAMES COME UP FOR THAT ONE SPECIFICALLY. WE ARE, THE CITY IS NOT ON THE HOOK FOR THAT ASSESSMENT, THE DEVELOPER IS. SO, BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES WHO BONDED FOR IT. BUT I WILL HAVE HIM ANSWER THAT SPECIFICALLY IF HE CAN. >>, JAMES HAMEL , I AM THE DIRECTOR WITH CSEA, SO THERE ARE INSTANCES OF THAT, AND THERE ARE TIMES THAT WE TURN TO WHAT WE CALL FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT WITH PROPERTY OWNER WE DO HAVE THAT IN CASES WHERE PEOPLE LOSE THEIR JOBS , THAT HAPPENS, SO THERE'S A FORBEARANCE WHERE THEY CAN PAY THAT OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. FOR THAT BOND THAT THE CHAIR WAS MENTIONING. >> I WILL SAY THAT THEY NEGOTIATE WITH YOU DIRECTLY FOR THE FORBEARANCE? SPIKE THEY DO NEGOTIATE DIRECTLY. >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> SO, SORT OF ALONG THE SAME LINES AS I QUESTION, SO THE DEVELOPER IS TECHNICALLY THE HOMEOWNER BEFORE THE HOMES ARE SOLD , SO THEY, I KNOW I READ IN THE STAFF REPORT THAT THE HOMEOWNERS VOTE FOR IT. BUT POTENTIALLY THESE ARE BONDED BEFORE ANYBODY HAS EVEN BOUGHT IN TO SPEC THAT IS CORRECT. >> OKAY, SO SOMETIMES PEOPLE ARE WALKING INTO SITUATIONS , I THINK WE SHOULD HIGHLIGHT THAT IT HELPS TO KEEP THE INITIAL HOME PRICE LOW, LOWER, WHICH WAS HELD, BUT ON THE BACKEND, AND I THESE ASSESSMENTS , I LIVE IN AN OLD HOUSE HAVE ASSESSMENT, ARE THEY FOREVER? OR IS IT JUST UNTIL THE BOND IS PAID OFF. SO COULD BE FOREVER. I WANT TO SAY MOST OF THEM 30 YEARS. 30 YEARS. SPIKE OKAY. AND THEN HOW DOES IT WORK? IF THEY SELL THE HOUSE, THE NEW HOMEOWNER TAKES THE SAME. AND THEN I KNOW, WHILE THE CITY IS NOT ON THE HOOK, YOU SPECIFICALLY WITH EMERSON RANCH , WE CONSTANTLY HEAR ABOUT HOW WE ARE ASSESSING PEOPLE TO DEATH I WAS A RATHER REAL ESTATE AGENTS, IS A REAL ESTATE STOCK TO DISCLOSE THAT INFORMATION, BUT IS THERE ANYTHING AT THE CITY LEVEL THAT WE CAN DO TO ENSURE THAT , YOU KNOW, 15 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD RESIDENTS ARE NOT SAYING OH, THE CITY OF OAKLEY IS BLEEDING ME DRY WHEN REALLY IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCLOSED TO THEM IN THE BEGINNING? >> YEAH. I MEAN WE CAN CONTROL WHAT IS DISCLOSED AND NOT DISCLOSED, I DO KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY IT IS DISCLOSED IN THE BEGINNING WHETHER OR NOT A HOMEOWNER UNDERSTANDS THAT, OR, I MEAN ABOUT UNCLE RIGHT , WE KEEP SIGNING UNTIL WE GET TO THE END, WHICH WE SHOULD NOT DO. BUT, I DO THINK THAT ANYBODY WHO WOULD KNOW WHAT TO CALL AND TALK TO US ABOUT IT, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE TWO ASSESSMENTS SO THAT WE COULD DEFINITELY TELL THEM HERE'S THE CITY ASSESSMENT VERSUS HERE IS THE ASSESSMENT THAT WE WERE PUT IN PLACE THAT WE REALLY DON'T HAVE ANY , LIKE I WAS IN CONTROL OF HER BECAUSE WE ARE ACCEPTING RESOLUTIONS TO ALLOW IT, BUT IT IS NOT NECESSARILY OUR ASSESSMENT. >> ANY OTHER COUNSEL QUESTIONS? SEEING NONE. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? SEEING THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THIS TIME WILL HAVE COUNSEL DELIBERATION. COUNSEL FOR FULLER? >> MY CONCERN IS, AND I AM VERY ADAMANT ABOUT IT AS MULTIPLE NO, PUT I AM DOING IT AS A TAX. ANOTHER THE DEVELOPER IS NOT, AND IS PUTTING OUT THAT ALLOWS HIM TO BE SO , THE HOUSE SOLD AT A LOWER PRICE. AND COMES ABOUT. BUT NORMALLY THAT GOES INTO THE PURCHASE OF THE HOUSE. AND THE PERSON CAN GO GET THE MORTGAGE AND WORK THROUGH THAT, HOPEFULLY CARRYOVER AND ACCESS COLLECTIVE IN THOSE. BUT IN THIS CASE, WE ARE ATTACHING TAX TO IT, BECAUSE IT IS, WELL, IT'S MORE THAT YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE GOOD FOR SOME PEOPLE. IT IS , WE HAVE HAD GOOD RELATIONS WITH DEVELOPERS , TO SAY THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE DONE WELL, BUT I DO HEAR ALL THE TIME ABOUT THE HIGH TAXES , SUMMER LAKE , AND A FEW OF THE OTHERS. ONE OF THE REASONS IS IS BECAUSE OF THE ASSESSMENT , AND MOST OF THEM, I HEAR ABOUT OUR YOUNG FAMILIES , BUYING THEIR FIRST HOUSE, MOVING IN. WITH THEIR EYE ON THE DEVELOPER AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENT IN ALL OF THIS, AND I'M NOT SAYING THEY POTENTIALLY LIVE WITHOUT. BUT BEING NOT FULLY AWARE OF ALL OF THE INS AND OUTS OF PURCHASING, AND THEY RELY VERY HEAVILY ON THE REAL ESTATE, OFFICER, AND THE DEVELOPER , AND SOMETIMES THIS THAT , SOMETIMES HAVE A PROPERTY TAX WAY BEYOND WHAT THEY THOUGHT. SO THEY BOUGHT THE HOUSE. BECAUSE BACK IN THE DAY, FEW YEARS AGO, 300,000 , I WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW , IT'S SKYROCKETED. THE COUNSELOR AT THE SCHOOL BOARDS AND OTHERS JUST THOUGHT, YEAH. IT IS JUST A STACK OF FREEDOM , AND LIBERTY BECAUSE I WANTED SO ON. WITH THESE FACILITIES. SO, I AM SKITTISH TO HOW I RUN. >> COUNSEL FOR SHAW? >> I AM IN ONE OF THE HOUNDS THAT HAVE RELIEF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS , AND ALL THE EXTRA STUFF ATTACHED TO IT. I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS GOING TO COME TO THE HOMEOWNER ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, WITH THE DISTRIBUTORS, PRICE, OR THE ASSESSMENT. AND I DO NOT QUALIFY FOR MY HOUSE THE PURCHASE PRICE. AND WHILE I AM IN THE SAME BOAT ABOUT PEOPLE , IT IS YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PLAY . SO AS MUCH AS I FIND AGAINST TEXAS AND DID NOT WANT ANY ADDITIONAL , I WANT TO QUALIFY FOR A HOME, AND I THINK THAT IS IMPORTANT. >> VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> DO WE HAVE ANY STATISTICS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF --SORRY THIS IS A NETWORK , I WAS NOT READY FOR THIS, BUT DO WE HAVE ANY STATISTICS ABOUT HOW MANY HOMEOWNERS HAVE LIKE BENEFITED FROM THE ABILITY? LIKE HONESTLY, YOU KNOW, COUNCILMAN BASHAW, SHE WOULD NOT HAVE APPLIED FOR HERS IF SHE WAS IN THE PURCHASE PRICE. WE HAVE SOME SORT OF SENSE OF LIKE I MAY CONCERN IS THAT THE SUSPENDED PENDING THE RESIDENCE AND NOT BENEFITING DEVELOPERS. BECAUSE THAT IS WHO WE ARE HERE TO SERVE, IS THE RESIDENCE NOT NECESSARILY A DEVELOPER. SO I GUESS I JUST WANT TO KNOW, DO WE, DO WE HAVE SOME SORT OF SENSE OF HOW BENEFICIAL THIS PROGRAM IS SPECIFICALLY TO OAKLEY? >> I WOULD NOT HAPPEN TONIGHT. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO TALK WITH THE TEAM AND SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT I HAVE THAT WE CAN PROVIDE BACK TO YOU. I DO NOT HAVE IT TODAY. >> I KNOW YOU'RE LOOKING AT ME. >> I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO SAY SOMETHING. >> I MEAN, IT'S JUST I'VE SEEN FOR YEARS AND I DON'T HAVE STATISTICS, BUT BUT IN LIGHT OF THE SALES THAT I'VE SEEN COME THROUGH, PEOPLE ARE GETTING IN, JUST BARELY GETTING IN. THEY STRESSED TO GET INTO THE HOUSE THEY GET INTO. THEY DON'T TYPICALLY TIE DOWN, THEY BUY TO THE MAX. BY QUALIFYING ALONE. SO, YEAH, I WOULD SAY IF IT KEEPS THE PRICES LOWER, THEN YEAH, PROBABLY , PROBABLY BENEFIT. >> AND IS A MAXIMUM THAT CAN BE ASSESSED ONTO SOMEBODY? DO WE HAVE ANY , NOT THE CITY NECESSARILY, BUT IT IS A STATEWIDE PROGRAM, IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE SHOULD BE LIKE, OKAY, YOU CANNOT LIKE IF THEY ARE BARELY QUALIFYING , BUT THEN THEY GET THERE ASSESSMENTS AND IS BRINGING THEIR MORTGAGE UP BY, YOU KNOW, $2000 A MONTH, LIKE IS THERE A CAP TO THAT? OR IS IT KIND OF AN UNLIMITED AMOUNT? >> I AM NOT GOING TO SPEAK AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE, BUT RESELL, YOU KNOW WHAT THE TAXES ARE. >> SO THE MAX BY STATE LOST 2%. >> OKAY. >> HOWEVER, WE TYPICALLY GO OVER 1.7%, BECAUSE WE DON'T SELL THESE BONDS IN THE MARKETPLACE IF YOU GO TOO HIGH , THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SELL THE BECAUSE IT IS LEVERAGED TOO MUCH. >> COUNSEL NUMBER HENDERSON? >> I JUST WANT TO KIND OF REDIRECT WHERE I THINK WE ARE TONIGHT'S WE ARE ALREADY PART OF THIS PROGRAM, WE ARE DEPENDING ON THIS PROGRAM TO DO THE COLLECTIONS, SO WHAT WE ARE REALLY HERE TO TALK ABOUT TONIGHT IS TO CONTINUE STAYING IN THE PROGRAM . AND SO, I HEAR WHAT EVERYBODY IS SAYING ABOUT THE TAXES AND THINGS, BUT JUST KIND OF BRING THIS BACK TO FOCUS WE ARE HERE FOR. >> COUNSEL FOR SHAW? >> IT IS STAYING IN THE PROGRAM BUT EXPANDING THEIR ABILITY, THEIR REACH ON WHAT THEY CAN INCLUDE IN THESE BONDS. SO IT COULD POTENTIALLY BE A LITTLE HIGHER. THEN WHAT WE HAVE. SO, YES, WE ARE ON THE PROGRAM, I WAS DO WANT TO CLARIFY THAT IT IS GOING TO BE EXPENDING WHAT HE CAN INCLUDE IN THESE. >> ANY OTHER COUNSEL COMMENTS, DELIBERATION? IT SOUNDS LIKE MAJORITY OF THE COUNCILS IN FAVOR OF IT? IS THERE MOTION? >> I MOVED TO BE WRITTEN AS IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR THE >> I SECOND SPIKE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. >> I PATIENCE OPPOSED? >> NO. >> 4-1. >> ITEM 4.2 MASTER AMENDMENT. CAN. >> HI, GOOD EVENING. MAYORS OF THE CITY COUNCIL , I AM KENT STREET LOW PLANNING MANAGER FOR HER CITY VOCAL. TONIGHT WE HAVE A CONTINUED PROGRAM HEARING COLONISTS ON A MASTER AMENDMENT OF SEVERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS THAT ARE PART OF THE GRAND CYPRESS PRESERVE PROJECT LOCATED OUT IN EAST CYPRESS CORRIDOR SPECIFICALLY BUT OUT, WAY OUT EAST OAKLEY , EAST OF JERSEY ISLAND ROAD , NORTH AND SOUTH. OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD. THE REQUEST FOR THIS IS TO EXTEND THE TERM OF FACTOR FOR DEVELOPING AGREEMENTS FROM DECEMBER 13th OF 2025 TO DECEMBER 13th OF 2045. IT INCLUDES FOUR DIFFERENT PLANNING AREAS, WHAT IS KNOWN AS AREAS THAT WERE LAID OUT IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN THAT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED. THREE OF THOSE PLANNING AREAS WERE MASTER-PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS, ONE OF THEM IS A SMALL PARCEL THAT IS PART OF THE CONGO GOVERNMENT OF DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS , AND THAT IS THE ONE KNOWN AS AREA 6 H. AND JUST AT THE BACKGROUND FOR ALL OF THIS, ALL OF THESE PROJECTS THAT ARE PART OF THE MASTER AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS ARE PART OF AN APPROVED , THEY HAVE AN APPROVED TENTATIVE NOW , AND THEY HAVE AN EXISTING RELEVANT AGREEMENT. THIS SLIDE ALSO SHOWS TO SOME BACKGROUND ON THE SITE THE GENERAL PLANNING AND ZONING OF SPECIFIC PLANS. SO THE COUNSEL HAS BEEN PRESENTED WITH THIS PROJECT IN THE RECENT PAST . DRIZZLE WENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE , RECOMMENDED THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE MASTER AMENDMENT . IT CAME TO THE COUNCIL AND WAS CONTINUED TO BE IN SEPTEMBER. AT THAT TIME, CAME BACK TO THE COUNCIL AND HAS CONTINUED TO A DATE UNCERTAIN. THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR THOSE CONTINUATIONS WAS TO ALLOW STAFF AND THE DEVELOPER MORE TIME TO WORK OUT DETAILS ON A DIFFERENT, ON A RELATED BUT SEPARATE AGREEMENT ON SOME OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE CYPRESS CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN. TONIGHT THIS ITEM HAS BEEN RE-NOTICED ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF THAT ENTIRE AREA, YOU SAW THE MAP, HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE TIME SPENT THAT WAS ALSO DONE FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR THIS ACCIDENT TURN. AND NOW COMES BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH ANOTHER PLANNING COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL. THIS INFORMATION AND MORE INFORMATION IS IN THE STAFF REPORT, BUT THIS JUST SHOWS THAT A BRIEF GLIMPSE AT THE FIVE DIFFERENT PROJECTS THAT HAVE DEVELOPING AGREEMENTS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THIS MASTERMIND. WE ARTIE TALKED ABOUT THE TERM EXTENSION , THERE'S ALSO ANOTHER SECTION IN THE MASTER AMENDMENT THAT CLARIFIES THE CAPABILITY OF TWO, THREE OF THE MITIGATION MEASURES THAT WERE FOUND IN THE CYPRESS CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN EIR'S. AND THOSE ARE MOSTLY RELATED TO THE MOXLEY RIDGE, AND THIS CLARIFIES THAT UNITS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN SIMILAR SOUTH WHICH WAS A PROJECT THAT WAS UNDERWAY EVEN BEFORE THE CITY ANNEXED THIS LAND. IN FUTURE UNITS IN SUMMERLIKE NORTH. THEY WOULD NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE AGREEMENT COUNT TO BUILD THAT BRIDGE BUT THAT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED BY HER CITY ATTORNEY AND ALL STAFF ARE IN AGREEMENT ON THAT. THIS IS JUST A SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS HERE. MASTERMAN WAS CONSISTENT OF THE EAST CYPRESS CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN, THAT WILL ALLOW THESE PROJECTS MORE TIME TO GET WORKED OUT AND PEOPLE . IT WILL INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD THAT THIS PROJECT IS FEASIBLE. AND CAN CONTRIBUTE TO ITS FAIR SHARE IN ITS IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IT IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE OAKLEY STRATEGIC PLAN 27+. THESE SUBELEMENTS , AT LEAST A COUPLE OF THEM ARE VERY IMPORTANT FOR CYPRESS ROAD. OTHER DEVELOPERS ARE IMPORTANT FOR BETHEL ISLAND ROAD, AND IN MUCH OF THE OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE IN THIS AREA. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION IS ATTACHED TO YOUR STAFF REPORT , AND WHEN RECOMMENDED THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THIS PROJECT. STATUS RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THIS PROJECT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING , THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ASKED THE DEVELOPER THE REASON FOR THE EXTENSION I'M HAPPY TO SUMMARIZE THAT REASON FOR YOU, THE DEVELOPER SEE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ASK THEM, BUT ESSENTIALLY THEY FEEL THE TENURE EXTENSION, WHICH WAS USUALLY REQUESTED MAY BE ENOUGH TIME, BUT WITH UNCERTAINTIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT MARKET, ESPECIALLY WITH WHAT WE HAVE GONE THROUGH OVER THE LAST THREE TO SEVEN YEARS , THEY WOULD LIKE THAT EXTRA TIME TO AVOID NEEDING TO COME BACK IF REQUESTING A DIFFERENT INITIAL TIME. THAT CONCLUDES MY STAFF, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, THANK YOU. >> ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? >> I JUST WANT TO ASK THE QUESTIONS , SINCE OBVIOUSLY LIST OF ELEMENT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE CYPRESS ROAD. EXTENDING THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DOES NOT SAY THEY ARE PUTTING OFF ANY EAST CYPRESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS UNTIL THE DEVELOPMENT BEGINS CORRECT? >> 100% CORRECT BUT DOES HAVE SOMETHING TO DO THIS BUT I AGREE. >> COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? >> THE ONE CONCERN THAT CAME TO MY MIND WHEN I WAS READING THIS IS WHERE PUTTING IT OUT , POSSIBLY TO 2045. I HAVE SAT IN HERE BEFORE ELECTION LAST NOVEMBER AND SAW THAT I THINK IT WAS THE LAST MEETING BEFORE THE ELECTION , HOW CAN I SAY, THE DESIGN FOR THE COMMUNITY AND THE PLACE. THAT IS GREAT. WE WILL KEEP IT ALL THE WAY THROUGH UNTIL 2045? OR? I KNOW THERE IS A MENTION IN THERE FOR MULTI FAMILY RESIDENCE COULD BE ALSO INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN. SO, THEY DO COME BACK SAY IN 20 33 , THE COUNCIL SITTING THERE IN THAT TIME. BE ABLE TO REVIEW THAT DESIGN AND APPROACH THE REGIONS FOR DIVORCE PERSPECTIVE FOR THESE PROJECTS, WE DON'T HAVE HOME DESIGN REVIEW . WE HAVE TENTATIVE MAPS WHICH WE LOOK AT CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING AND ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN ANALYZED AND REVIEWED WITH THE CYPRESS CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN, CONCEPTUAL PLANS. SO THOSE APARTMENTS YOU SPEAK OF, OR ANY OF THE FUTURE HOUSES IN ANY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WILL STILL, THEY STILL NEED TO COME FORWARD FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW. AND RECEIVE THOSE APPROVALS. SO WE DON'T HAVE THOSE LOCK IN YET, IF WE DID, THEY WOULD RUN WITH THE DEVELOPMENT, SO STAY AT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TIME. >> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE COUNCIL? SEEING NONE. THIS TIME IT WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? YOU CAN COME AND ASK. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. SO, IT IS WITH AN EXTENSION , WILL THE DEVELOPERS BE HELD WITH THE CURRENT PERCENTAGE OF THE REQUIRED FOAM A HOUSING IN ELEMENTS, OR IF IT GOES UP, IN FUTURE YEARS , WILL THEY BE REQUIRED TO MAKE THAT A PERCENTAGE? THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION, THROUGH THE MAYOR THIS PROJECT IS IRIS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY SORT OF WHAT WE WOULD CALL AND VISIONARY HOUSING, AND OTHER WORDS REQUIRING ANY BELOW-MARKET RATE HOUSING . IF THE DEVELOPERS A CHANCE TO SUBMIT SOME LIKE THAT IN THE FUTURE, WE WOULD HANDLE THAT APPLICATION AS NEED BE. AT THIS TIME THE CITY USES A SPECIAL ZONING OF THE DISTRICT AND IN THE FUTURE SPECIAL ZONE IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE WHAT WE WOULD CALL ORIGINAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT. PROVIDE LAND FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SO THAT IS A LONG ANSWER, SHORT ANSWER IS THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT MEETS THE RELEVANT. >> THANK YOU. ANY OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS? ACTUALLY, I SKIPPED, IS THERE ANY COMMENT BY THE APPLICANT TO >> EVENING, MR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. I'M A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ENTITY. AND WE CONCUR WITH THE STAFF ANALYSIS , WE APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ALL THE GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIP OF THE STAFFORD HAVE ANY PARTICULAR OTHER REMARKS OTHER THAN THAT, THANK YOU. >> AT THIS TIME WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CALL FOR DELIBERATION. THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? SEEING NONE. IS THERE , WOULD SOMEBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? >> I WILL MOVE. >> ALL IN FAVOR? >> I. >> OPPOSED. PASSES 5-0. OKAY, ITEM FIVE, REGULAR CALENDAR. ADOPT A SUPERSEDING AGREEMENT REGARDING THE REIMBURSEMENT FOR AND LIMITATION OF CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE GRAND CYPRESS PRESERVE PROJECT WITH A CD TI OAKLEY LLC. MR. McMURRAY. >> IT MAY EVENING MR. MAYOR , MADAM VICE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL NUMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, THIS ITEM COINCIDES WITH THE PREVIOUS ITEM IN THAT IT HAS TO DO WITH THE PROJECT AREA THAT WAS DISCUSSED BEFORE. SO THIS IS ESSENTIALLY THE SINGLE LARGEST MASTER PLAN SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE CITY OF OAKLEY , AND IT IS CRITICAL TO OUR FUTURE EXPANSION AND ALSO CRITICAL TO PROVIDING MUCH-NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE FAR END , EAST END OF THE CITY. BACK IN APRIL OF 2022 , STAFF BROUGHT FORWARD A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE INTENT OF THE AGREEMENT WAS TO IMPLEMENT THE EAST CYPRESS CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AND SPECIFICALLY THE TENTATIVE MAPS THAT WE WERE JUST DISCUSSING AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION. AND THAT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WAS SPECIFICALLY AIMED TO ACCELERATE THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD. BUT ULTIMATELY THAT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FELL WITH THE BURDEN OF THE DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. AND IT WAS THROUGH DISCUSSIONS WITH THE DEVELOPER , WE CAME TO A MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING THAT IF THE CITY WERE TO TAKE ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD IS A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT , WE COULD REALIZE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS MUCH SOONER THAN THE DEVELOPER WAS GOING TO BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT, SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING VERY HARD WITH THE DEVELOPER OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS TO COME UP WITH A SUPERSEDING AGREEMENT TO THAT APRIL 22 AGREEMENT TO MEMORIALIZE HOW WE MOVE THROUGH THE TRANSITION OF ACQUIRING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM THE DEVELOPER , WHICH STILL OWNS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT A CYPRESS ROAD BUILDOUT. AND ALSO HOW WE DEAL WITH THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THAT WE ALREADY ENTERED INTO? IF SO WHAT IS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A SUPERSEDING AGREEMENT, AND ESSENTIALLY WILL TRANSITION ALL OF THE PLANS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS OF THE DEVELOPER HAS SPECIFIC TO THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD IMPROVEMENT, THIS WOULD BE FROM THE CANAL TO BETHEL ISLAND ROAD . THE CITY WOULD TAKE CONTROL OF THOSE PLANS, WE WOULD HAVE A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS WHILE THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER DEDICATION TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLACE IN ESCROW, AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, COMPLETION OF THE CITIES WORK , WE WOULD THEN SEE THAT REVOCABLE OFFER THAT OCCASION, THAT WOULD BE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. SO AS PART OF THE AGREEMENT AND THANK YOU TONIGHT, THERE ARE SEVERAL KEY POINTS THAT I WOULD JUST LIKE TO HIGHLIGHT PART OF THE AGREEMENT STILL AFFORDS THE DEVELOPER TRAFFICKING IMPACT FEE CREDITS FOR CONSTRUCTION , JERSEY ISLAND ROAD, WHATEVER THAT IS CONSTRUCTED. IN THIS CREDIT TO BE APPLIED TO THE HOMES IN THAT SUBDIVISION. IT LOCKS IN THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES LATER TO TRAFFIC AND PUBLIC FACILITIES. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES WALKED IN FOR A PERIOD , THESE FEES ARE FROZEN IN TIME FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS IN A SINGLE FAMILY RATE. I'M SORRY, 12 YEARS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RATE, AND TENURES FOR MULTI FAMILY RATE. IN A PUBLIC FACILITY FEE IS LOCKED IN FOR A 10 YEAR PERIOD. AT THE END OF THE PERIODS THEY ARE JUST UPWARDS FROM THE FEE THAT IS IN PLACE AT THAT TIME. WE WILL MOVE THE FEE UP 50%. AND THEN PAY THAT FEE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT, WHICH IS 20 YEARS. WE ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT THERE ARE MEDICATIONS, MEASURES DEALING WITH FAIR SHARE PAYMENTS TO THE COUNTY, THE DISAGREEMENT MEMORIALIZES HOW WE WILL SET EXCEPT PAYMENTS OF THE SPECIAL PAYMENTS, WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY BE TRANSITIONED AND PASSED THROUGH THROUGH THE COUNTY. IN ADDITION, THERE IS RECOGNITION THAT THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CITY TO RELIEVE OURSELVES OF SOME FUTURE REIMBURSEMENT MONEY IF WE ARE ABLE TO LOOK AT THE SECONDARY AXIS THAT RIGHT NOW IS FROM BETTELHEIM ROAD AND EXTENDS SOUTH OVER ROCK SLEEP RIDGE AND ULTIMATELY DELTA ROACH. WE ARE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO THAT BRIDGE ALIGNMENT THAT NO LONGER NECESSITATES A BRIDGE WILL BE ABLE TO TRAVERSE IN AN EVACUATION. THROUGH WHICH WOULD RELIEVE SOME OF THE OBLIGATION OF THE ENTIRE SPECIFIC PLAN. SO IN A NUTSHELL, THOSE ARE THE COMPONENTS OF THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT. I THINK WITH GOOGLE HERE IN MY OPINION AND STAFF'S OPINION WOULD LIKE TO CONVEY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IS THAT THIS WILL ALLOW US TO CONTROL OUR DESTINY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD. IN THE FIRST SEGMENT OF THAT ROADWAY HAS BEEN BUDGETED , AND IDENTIFIED IN OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR. WE ARE IN CONSTANT VACATION AND CORONATION WITH THE CWD, BECAUSE THE FIRST PHASE WILL INVOLVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY OVER THE CANAL CROSSING. AND ALTHOUGH IT IS A ROADWAY PROJECT, THERE'S ALSO CANAL UNDER GROUTING AND ENCASEMENT PROJECT, AND A LADY COMPARTMENT PIECE OF THE PROJECT. THAT WILL GO FIRST. AND WE ARE READY TO START CONSTRUCTION AS SOON AS WE ARE ABLE TO ATTEND THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY , I WOULD SAY THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND THE PLANS TO MOVE THEM FORWARD. BUT WE ARE READY TO START THAT WORK RIGHT AWAY, AND ULTIMATELY START CONSTRUCTION OF THE SECOND PHASE WOULD BE AFTER THE CANAL EAST, ONLY TO BETHLEHEM ROAD. THAT WOULD BE PRESENTED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 24 -25 PROJECT , AND ALSO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. SO THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT, I WOULD LIKE TO, BEFORE I CLOSE POINT OUT ONE TYPO IN THE RESOLUTION OF THIS IS ON PAGE 120 OF YOUR AGENDA. THE FIRST WHERE AS REFERENCES APRIL 13th, 2023 , AND THAT SHOULD SAY APRIL 13th 2022 WHICH IS THE DATE THAT THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT WAS ENTERED INTO WITH THE DEVELOPER. SO WITH THAT, THAT INCLUDES A PRESENTATION , AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >> OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL? VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> SO YOU SAID THAT , YOU KNOW, WE ARE READY TO BEGIN THE WORK AS SOON AS THAT, ALL THAT PROCESS GOES THROUGH. SO IF THIS , IF WE DO THIS AGREEMENT, HOW SOON CAN WE GET THAT? >> I WOULD SAY IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. PROBABLY TOWARDS THE BEGINNING OF NEXT YEAR. WE HAVE THE ORDINANCE THAT WAS WAIVED AND INTRODUCED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION OF 4.2, IT STILL NEEDS TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AND REMEMBER. AND THEN THERE IS A PERIOD OF TIME THAT WE HAVE TO REQUEST ITEMS FROM THE DEVELOPER THERE'S A PERIOD OF TIME IN WHICH THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE ITEMS. AND THEN WE HAVE TO BID THE WORK BEFORE WE CAN ACTUALLY START CONSTRUCTION TO DO SO, WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT LIKE WORK TO DO, BUT WE ARE CLOSER THAN WE HAVE EVER BEEN TO STARTING WORK ON THAT SECTION. >> AND THEN I AM ASSUMING THAT WE DO START THAT SECTION OF THE ROADWAY, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF MEDICATION WITH RESIDENTS ABOUT HOW TO GET OUT. I MEAN I KNOW ANY PROJECT THAT HAPPENS OUT THERE WE GET LOTS OF FEEDBACK, SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF INDICATION ABOUT ALL OF THE STUFF HAPPENING . OF COURSE, I THINK OF STUFF HAPPENING WITH THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, THINK IT IS CRITICAL THAT IT RETAINS TO PUBLIC OF WHAT WE'RE DOING AND WHY WERE DOING IT, THIS IS ONE OF THE TOP PRIORITIES WANT TO MAKE SURE THE PUBLIC IS VERY AWARE OF THE INVESTMENT, AND THE PRIORITY THE CITY COUNCIL HAS PLACED . >> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER COUNSEL QUESTIONS? COUNSELOR HARRIS. >> IN A ROUGH TIME OF CONCLUSION FOR CONSTRUCTION? >> THE AGREEMENT, IF WE SATISFY COMES UP EDITIONS WITH THIS THE CONSTRUCTION, I WOULD SAY THAT IS MORE THAN INTERESTING. >> EXCELLENT. ANY OTHER COUNSEL QUESTIONS? PUBLIC COMMENTS? SEEING THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. DO YOU , WE NEED TO MENTION SEQUEL DETERMINATION? >> IF YOU COULD, THAT WOULD BE GREAT. >> SEQUEL DETERMINATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT THE PROJECT AS IT INVOLVED THE FUNDING FOR SECRET GUIDELINES. CALIFORNIA CODE OF RELATIONS TITLE 14 SECTION 15378 B 4 ON ENVIRONMENT ALL WITH THE PROJECTS TITLE IN THE PROCESS. >> IS THERE ANY COUNSEL DELIBERATION? CUSTOMER FILLER? STOMACH, SUCH AS WHAT TO MAKE A COMMENT ON WE WANT TO THANK THE DEVELOPER, ACD-TI . AND MR. McMURRAY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE , BRING ABOUT THE EXPANSION OF EAST CYPRESS. I WANT TO SAY THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO IN OAKLEY. I AM HEARING OVER, AND OVER, AND OVER AGAIN, ESPECIALLY OUT IN THE MORE POPULATED, RICH AREAS, SAN FRANCISCO, BERKELEY AND SUCH, WE ARE NOT DOING ENOUGH. WHAT WE ARE. AND WE ARE DOING IT WITH PRIVATE CAPITAL. PRIVATE CAPITAL IS CONSIDER BUILDING A. WE ARE NOT DOING IT WITH PUBLIC FUNDS. WE ARE GETTING RESULTS, AND THIS IS WHAT IS HERE. CYPRESS WAS A DISASTER , ACD-TI SAT DOWN, YES, THE BACK-AND-FORTH OF ATTORNEYS RINGING THE BELL AND EVERYTHING. THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE WERE ABLE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT TO HAVE AN EXPANSION. WE ALSO NEED TO MENTION OTHER, OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT WE WORK WELL WITH, I DON'T KNOW THEM ALL, BUT DE NOVO, THEY KNOW WHAT IS COMING, AND WAITING TO OPEN UP THEIR DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BETHEL ISLAND AND ESSENTIAL, OR CYPRESS. THEY HAD THEIR OWN BUILDERS REMEDY , WHICH DID NOT HAVE TO ABIDE BY BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES, BUT THEY BROUGHT IN THEIR OWN SOLUTION, WORKING WITH THE CITY TO HAVE 20% ABATED LOW AND VERY LOW RESIDENCE , WHAT I MEAN BY THAT, THEY WILL REMAIN THAT WAY FOR 50 YEARS. IF ANYBODY WANTS ANY MORE INFORMATION, I AM SURE MR. McMURRAY CAN SAY IT. BUT THAT IS THE TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP. THEY WERE BOUND BY THE BECAUSE OF WHAT THE LAWS WERE PASSED. BUT THEY HAVE TALKED TO US BEFORE, AND THEY COMMITTED IT TO THIS COMMUNITY. WE HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH MERITAGE, KB, TI, AND I KNOW I AM MISSING A FEW DEVELOPERS, BUT TO SAY WE ARE NOT DOING AND WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPERS TO DEVELOP THIS COMMUNITY WITH AVOIDABLE HOUSING THAT CAN INVITE ALL AND OF INCLUSIVE AREA IS , WHAT WE ARE DOING THAT. WE ARE DOING IT, WE ARE WORKING WITH THIS, REALLY HAVE TO THANK HIM FOR HIS KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERTISE, AND THE MEMBERS ARE COMING IN HERE TO WORK TOGETHER TO FIND THESE TYPES OF SOLUTIONS PERSPECTIVE SHOPPERS STOMACH I SHOULD ALSO JUST WANT TO THANK THE HARD WORKERS, THERE WAS A LOT OF BACK-AND-FORTH , WHILE IT'S IN MY DISTRICT IS WITH THIS ENTIRE COUNSEL HAS BEEN VERY STRONG TO MAKE IT A PRIORITY. SO I DO APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK , AND EVERY THING THAT HAS GONE INTO ALLOWING US TO GET THIS STARTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. AND FOR THOSE THAT ARE LISTENING OUT THERE IN THE VIRTUAL WORLD, IT IS GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, SO CONSTRUCTION. SO BEAR WITH US AND KNOW THAT THIS HAS BEEN FOR THE SAFETY OF ALL OF THE RIGHT RESIDENCE IS OUT IN BETHEL LAKE. THIS IS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING SO, SO DO APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT HAS PUT IN. >> THIS ITEM WAS THE FIRST CALL ITEM ONCE I WAS SWORN IN. SO , IT'S BEEN A WHILE. IS THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IS THERE A MOTION? >> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION OF ADOPTING ALL OF THE THINGS THAT WERE SAID IN THE SPIRIT OF >> I WILL SECOND. >> CAN WE MAKE SURE WE HAVE THE 2022? >> YES, WITH THE CHANGE IN THE DATE ON THE RESOLUTION. >> THANK YOU. >> ALL IN FAVOR? >> I. I. POST? 5-0. THANK YOU. ITEM 6 REPORT, 6.1 CITY MANAGER. >> GUESS, I WOULD LIKE TO JUST CALL ATTENTION, HAVE ATTACHED THE SEPTEMBER BUSINESS LICENSE LIST AS NEW BUSINESSES THAT HAS OPENED UP A SHOP HERE IN OAKLEY, EITHER BRICK-AND-MORTAR OR BASED HIGHLIGHT THOSE EASEMENTS. FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO THANK ALL THE STAFF THAT WORK TO BRING OKTOBERFEST TO THE COMMITTEE AGAIN, IT WAS A GREAT EVENT, REALLY WELL ATTENDED, AND IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO SHOWCASE , YOU KNOW, WHAT WE COULD DO FOR OUR COMMUNITY HERE IN THE CITY. AND LASTLY , IN THAT SPIRIT, NEXT YEAR WILL BE OUR 25th ANNIVERSARY AS A CITY, THAT WAS A PRETTY BIG DEAL, AND WE HAVE BEEN TALKING A STAFF , AS WHAT WE CAN DO TO CELEBRATE THAT, NOT JUST ONE TIME, BUT MANY TIMES ARE THE YEAR, NEW LOGO OR 20th ANNIVERSARY LOGO. HANSEN STICKERS MADE COMMON T-SHIRTS , EVERYTHING THAT GOES ALONG WITH THAT CELEBRATION, BECAUSE I THINK WE DESERVE THAT AS A COMMUNITY, WE HAVE COME A LONG WAY SINCE 1999. AND WE HAVE A LONG WAY TO GO, BUT IT IS TIME TO CELEBRATE , AND WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DO IS TO HAVE THE COUNCIL SELECT TWO MEMBERS FROM THE COUNCIL TO SIT ON A SUBCOMMITTEE WITH CITY STAFF , AND MEMBERS OF OUR ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP AN APPROACH HOW WE WANT TO ADDRESS THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE TO MAKE SURE WE ARE APPROPRIATELY DELIVERING TO THE COMMUNITY WHAT THEY SO GREATLY DESERVE. SO, WITH THAT WE WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL TO DECIDE KIND OF INFORMALLY TWO PEOPLE TO SERVE ON THAT SUBCOMMITTEE WITH STAFF. >> OKAY. I WOULD LIKE TO SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE. ANYBODY ELSE? STOMACH I AM WAY MORE FUN THAN HIM, SO I DEFINITELY WOULD LIKE TO ALSO SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE. >> WHAT IT SAY? STOMACH I SAID I WAY MORE FUN, WAY MORE FUN THAN YOU. >> SHE THAT SHE IS MORE FUN. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE AN INTEREST? I HAVE INTEREST, BUT IF THE TWO OF YOU ARE GOING TO FIGHT OVER IT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO BOW OUT. >> WE WANT TO SAY SOMETHING? >> I'M WAITING TO SEE MY COMMENTS. >> COUNCIL MEMBER FOLIC? >> IS FINE. SO, I'M GOING TO PASS ON THIS ONE. >> OKAY, I MEAN IT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA SO WE DON'T BOW PERSPECTIVE, THAT WE HAVE ANOTHER LOOK AND BEAT WITH IT WITH YOU TOO. THANK YOU. >> ANYTHING ELSE? >> NO, MAYOR, THAT INCLUDES THAT REPORT. >> CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS AN ACCESSORY TO THE OAKLAND OR THE RELEVANT AGENCY. >> I DID NOT SAY WHO. COUNSEL FOR FULLER. >> YES. I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND THE AMERICAN LEGION HOST TO A TWO IN BRENTWOOD, WHICH COVERS ALSO QUICKLY , MEMBERS. BE THE ONE DANCE AND IT WAS A GOOD EVENT IN CALL EITHER ONE IS ABOUT, RUNNING THAT AMERICAN LEGION , BEING THAT WE HAVE AN EPIDEMIC OF SUICIDES ON VETERANS IN THE UNITED STATES. IN 2020 THERE WERE 17 TO BESIDES JUST EXERCISE TODAY WITH VETERANS IN THE U.S. THEY FOUND THAT UNDER THE CDC FOUND THAT IF YOU ARE UNDER THE AGE OF 45 AND A VETERAN AND A MALE , AND YOU HAVE A 57.3% BETTER CHANCE OF COMMITTING SUICIDE THAN OTHER MALES. THAT HAVE NOT BEEN VETERANS , THE IDEA BEHIND BE THE ONE IS BE THE ONE WHO SEES THE VETERAN HAVING TROUBLE AND GET A HOLD OF SOMEBODY THAT THEN HELPS THEM. IT IS THERE. WHILE I WAS THERE, I GOT A COW THAT BOOKS. I'M HOLDING IT UP BECAUSE THIS IS A GEM, IN THIS ALL VETERAN'S BENEFITS FOR THE CALIFORNIA PROVIDES IN TERMS OF VETERANS. IT INCLUDES THE RESIDENCE OF YACHT DALE AND OTHER RESIDENTS. IN THE STATE THAT HAS BEEN BUILT TO HOUSE VETERANS IN THEIR LATER YEARS. ACTUALLY MY SISTER PASSED AWAY IN MAY THEY ARE FROM CARE, IN THIS VERY LOVELY FACILITY , SHE IS ALSO BURIED AT DIXON NATIONAL CEMETERY. IT WAS A BENEFIT OF CAL VETS THAT COMES FROM THERE. I HAVE ASKED THAT MR. McMURRAY LOOK AND SEE IF HE CAN GET A HOLD OF MR. ROY MANNING, WHO WAS THE AMERICAN LEGION SPOKESPERSON ON THIS FOR THESE BOOKS OUT IN THE LOBBY , ALONG WITH A COUNTY VETERANS SERVICE BOOK. OUR ATHLETE. AND ALSO, THIS ONE IS A BIG ONE. VETERANS DRESSES LINING, IF YOU SEE A VETERAN OR A VETERAN IN NEEDS IS IN CRISIS OR NEEDS ASSISTANCE, NATIONWIDE , 98. 988. YOU CAN PRESS 988 AND GET A VETERAN ASSISTANCE AND VETERAN CAN GET A PRETTY WHEN YOU'RE THERE, FIRST ONE, BUT I'M SURE THE VOICEMAIL GET THERE. I WILL ASK THAT THESE BE PUT OUT TOO. I WENT TO OKTOBERFEST, IT WAS LOVELY, IT LOOKED LIKE A CELEBRATION. JUST PEOPLE GETTING TOGETHER TO SEE THAT, IT'S GOOD TO SEE SAINT ANTHONY'S WITH THEIR ABC OPERATION , WHEN THE OPERATION. BEING THERE . THE OAKLEY LIBRARY WAS THERE, BLISSFUL OR AND ARNOLD FITZGERALD WERE THERE , ALONG WITH OTHER INDIVIDUALS. I'M SORRY . BUT THEY HAVE BEEN LEADERS IN OUR COMMUNITY FOR YEARS NOW TRYING TO GET THE LIBRARY AT THERE. THERE IS , I MET WITH LAURIE WILSON'S A.I.D.S. THAT WERE THERE WERE ALSO ADVOCATING . AND OTHERS WERE THERE ALSO. AND LOST ONE , THIS ONE IS ALWAYS , THIS WILL CONTINUE TO BE NICE FOR THE NEXT FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27th. IT IS THE FREEDOM FUEL CAFE. AT FREEDOM HIGH SCHOOL . EXTREME WEST SIDE OF THE SCHOOL THERE IN THE BACK DOOR. AND BY A COUPLE COFFEE , I THINK THE LAST TIME I BOUGHT A COUPLE COFFEE FOR A DOLLAR. VERY NICE CUP OF COFFEE, AND FOR A TYPE OF A DOLLAR. IT WAS A NICE EVENT , BUT LIFE SKILLS CLASS , SO PERSPECTIVE IS THIS FRIDAY PERSPECTIVE. >> THIS FRIDAY? >> THIS FRIDAY I AM SORRY, AT A TRICKLE OF 45 BUT A 245 IN THE MORNING. SO. >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS. >> ALL RIGHT. SO I WILL KEEP IT SHORT, THE APP OF THE CONFERENCE. THERE WAS SOME REALLY INTERESTING THINGS THAT CAME UP DURING THE CONFERENCE. ONE THING THAT SHOULD BE CONCERNING TO ALL OF US IS THAT THERE ARE CURRENTLY ONLY THREE OF US MANUFACTURES IN THE UNITED STATES. AND ONE OF THEM JUST DECLARED BANKRUPTCY. AND THE WAY ALL OF OUR FEDERAL GUIDELINES ARE WRITTEN WE CAN ONLY PURCHASE BUNCHES THAT ARE MANUFACTURED IN THE U.S. SO, THERE IS QUICKLY BECOMING A VERY LONG WAITING LIST TO GET THOSE TWO BUS MANUFACTURERS. SO, YOU KNOW, WITH THE FUTURE OF TRANSIT WE SHOULD ALL PAUSE, BECAUSE THAT IS NOT JUST LARGE BUSES, IT IS ALL BUSES. SO THAT IS HAVE AN ISSUE. THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER THE FIRST DAY WAS THAT OF ANIMATION FOR DISNEY, AND THEY HAD IS REALLY GREAT THINGS TO SAY THAT CAN BE COMMUNICATIVELY USEFUL TO CITIES TOO PRETTY BASICALLY, YOU KNOW, GAVE US A WHOLE CONVERSATION ABOUT CREATIVITY, DIVISION, CURIOSITY, IMAGINATION, THOSE OF THE MOST EMPLOYABLE SKILLS THAT ANYBODY HAS TO HAVE, NONE OF THE THINGS CAN BE TAKEN OVER BY AI, HE WAS JUST ENCOURAGING ALL TO USE THAT. PRESS STAFF, EMPLOYEES, AND ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WE INTERACT WITH. THERE WAS A SESSION THAT I ATTENDED ON TRANSITS IMPACT FOSTERING OPPORTUNITY AND GROWTH IN COMMUNITY . L.A. IS GOING TO HOST THE 2020 PICS , AND THAT WILL BE THE VERY FIRST EVER CAR FREE BIG VENUE, SO WE SHOULD SEE SOME REALLY EXCITING THINGS ABOUT PUBLIC TRANSIT COMING OUT OF THAT. AND THERE WAS ALSO A REALLY INTERESTING THING THAT SOME CITIES HAVE PLANTED CALLED A RAPID TRANSIT ZONE, WHICH IS A POLICY THAT WAS DEVELOPED IN ORDER TO HAVE A PROTECTED GARDEN CITY ZONE, AND WAREHOUSING POLICY AND TRANSPORTATION HAD A GO HAND IN HAND. SO IT WAS REALLY INTERESTING TO GO TO THAT. AND THEY WERE ALSO GIVING US THINGS THAT I THOUGHT WHILE IT IS APPLICABLE TO TRANSIT, WE HAVE SOME PROJECTS THAT WERE REALLY IMPORTANT TO THE CITY, SO THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT DOING TIME-LAPSE VIDEOS BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHO IS INTERESTED IN THAT. NONE OF THE RESIDENCE OF CYPRUS WOULD REALLY LOVE TO SEE THEY CAME FROM AND WHERE IT IS GOING TO BE, SO I THAT WAS REALLY COOL, THEY SAID THAT IT WAS VERY CHEAP THING TO SET UP. AND THEN THERE WAS ALSO A PANELIST WHO WAS THE CEO OF AMTRAK , WHICH I THOUGHT WAS TIMELY FOR US, AND ONE THIRD OF ALL THE TRIPS ARE TAKEN ON AMTRAK ARE THROUGH COMMUTER RAILS. HE WAS A BIG ADVOCATE OF DESIGNING CITIES AROUND TRANSIT, NOT AS AN AFTERTHOUGHT AS ONE OF OUR CITIES HAVE BEEN. AND THEN SAINT PETE'S FLORIDA ACTUALLY HAS A REALLY GOOD FOOTPRINT FOR US TO LOOK AT FOR AS WERE TALKING ABOUT MOBILITY HUBS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO THEY HAVE A REALLY GOOD FOOTPRINT. AND LET'S SEE , AN INTERESTING NOTE ON U.S. HOME PRICES, IT HAS BEEN 140% INCREASE IN THE LAST 20 YEARS , 30% THAT BEING IN THE LAST THREE YEARS. AND 9% INCREASE IN RENT JUST OVER THE LAST YEAR. SO, WAGES CLEARLY ARE NOT GOING UP AT THE SAME RATE. AND ONE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP THAT SIMPLY INTERESTING IS PARK CITY TRANSIT, DESIGNED A PORTABLE HOUSING FOR THEIR TRANSIT EMPLOYEES , IT WAS A CITY PROJECT , BUT THEY WORK WITH THE TRANSIT COMPANY. THEY ARE $600 A MONTH, LOCAL TAX REVENUE , I KNOW NOT JUST MESSERLI WITH TRANSIT WORKERS, BUT WE HAVE FOLKS IN OUR SCHOOL DISTRICT EXECUTIVE SO I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS A MODEL SHOULD LOOK AT. SO, OKAY, SO THAT ALSO GOT TO ATTEND THE OAKLEY OAKLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING AT BRANSON, WAS AMAZING, LIKE SUCH A GOOD INSPIRATIONAL THING, I'M NOT SAYING THAT, BECAUSE I WAS THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER BUT IT WAS A REALLY GOOD INTERACTION AND FRESH IDEAS FOR BUSINESSES, I JUST THINK THERE'S SO MUCH ENERGY ACTIVITY AROUND IT, AND I JUST REALLY, REALLY EXCITED THAT WE ARE GETTING OFF THE GROUND AND BURLESQUE IS THE PERFECT PERSON FOR IT, HIS ATTITUDE OF ENERGY AND WANTS TO DO THINGS DIFFERENTLY, WHICH I THINK IS IMPORTANT TO A YOUNG CITY. SO. I THINK THAT WAS IT. I DID NOT GET TO MAKE IT TO OKTOBERFEST, I GOT OFF TOO LATE. >> COUNCILMEMBER SHAW? >> I WAS ALSO AT THE CONFERENCE, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO GO INTO ANY MORE DETAIL. THE VENDORS WERE INTERESTING , WE GOT YOU LOVE THE WAY TRANSIT IS GOING AND THE ZERO EMISSION STUFF. SO, VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS COVERED MOST OF IT. I ATTENDED THE IRON HOUSE MEETING VIRTUALLY LATER. I DID GO TO THE DECEPTION , WELCOMING DR. RALSTON AS THE SEVENTH PRESIDENT OF THE COLLEGE. I GOT A LAST MINUTE TEXT FROM SOMEBODY THAT WAS HAPPENING , I HAPPEN TO BE DOWN THE STREET, SO I WAS REALLY HAPPY TO BE ABLE TO GO TO THAT. I ALSO ATTENDED THE OCTOBER FESTIVAL AND A HALF TO ADMIT, THEY ASKED ME IF I HAD A LIBRARY CARD , I TAKE MY CRICKETS TO LIBRARY, THEY HAVE THEIR OWN LIBRARY CARD, AND I HAVE NOT HAD ONE WITH MY LAST NAME, I WILL BE MARRIED 15 YEARS TOMORROW, AND I HAVE A LIBRARY CARD NOW WITH MY LAST NAME ON IT. SO I HAD NO IDEA I HAD NOTHING. SMACK I GOT MY NEAR YEAR AGO. >> OCTOBER ONE OF THEM, WHERE THEY WERE HERE. >> SO NEXT WEEK LAST WEEK I INTENDED McE AND CTA MEETINGS. AND I ALSO ATTENDED OKTOBERFEST . THAT IS ALL I HAVE. WE HAVE NO WORK SESSIONS TONIGHT. WE HAVE A , ONE CLOSED , WE HAVE A CLOSED SESSION. >> I MAKE A REQUEST? >> SORRY. SMACK YOU WANT TO MAKE A FUTURE AGENDA ITEM? >> WELL, MORI ASKED MR. McMURRAY BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY HERE TOO THAT WE CAN GET SOME AND PERHAPS CREDIT TO THESE MINISTERS AND OR OTHERS THAT WERE CONFORMANCE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH VETERANS. THAT ARE GOING ON. >> I WOULD SUPPORT THAT. >> GOT TO SEE SPEAKER? >> AS A SPEAKER. >> ANY OTHER FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS? NO? OKAY. LIKE I SAID, NO WORK SESSIONS, AND 8.0, CLOSE SESSION. WE HAVE 8.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS, AGENCY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE, MAYOR ERIN MEADOWS, VICE MAYOR WILLIAMS, CITY ATTORNEY DEREK COLE, AND UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE CITY MANAGER JOSHUA McMURRAY. WHEN WE COME BACK FROM CLOSE SESSION WE HAVE NO OTHER BUSINESS , OUR NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14th AT 60:30 P.M. HERE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THANK YOU FOR COMING.

Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency and Special Meeting of the Oakley Public Financing Authority held October 24, 2023 1) OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority Mayor Aaron Meadows called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Anissa Williams and Councilmembers Dr. George Fuller, Hugh Henderson and Shannon Shaw were also present. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Layla Zaragoza, Summer Lake Elementary School Student) Summer Lake Elementary School Student Layla Zaragoza led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 1.3 Update from Scott Wannamaker, Assistant Fire Chief, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Assistant Fire Chief Scott Wannamaker provided a PowerPoint presentation. Vice Mayor Williams requested clarification on acronyms used during the presentation. Assistant Fire Chief Wannamaker explained that BLS is an EMT and another EMT, whereas ALS is an EMT with a paramedic, a different level of service. Dr. Fuller mentioned there has been a significant drop in call volume over 36 months. He inquired what Assistant Fire Chief Wannamaker would attribute that to. Assistant Fire Chief Wannamaker responded that calls for fires, rescues, and vehicle accidents, have remained stable, and they see some seasonal change due to flu response during winter months, but he believes Dr. Fuller is referring to ambulance only calls (Dr. Fuller clarified he is referring to City of Oakley calls) and they have had a shortage of ambulances recently so many of the calls for service had a mixed response that included an engine because ambulances

were delayed; therefore, a decrease of ambulance only calls results from a decrease in ambulance availability. He mentioned on the 19th, they instituted the BLS response tier model and their compliance numbers have changed dramatically in the last 5 weeks. 1.4 Presentation by Gary Parkhurst, Mount Diablo Interpretive Association, regarding the Mitchell Canyon Educational Center Gary Parkhurst, with Mount Diablo Interpretive Association, provided a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed Mitchell Canyon Education Center. 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS Dawn Morrow commented that she appreciates the improvements in landscaping in Vintage Parkway and appreciates the new audience chairs in the Council Chambers. 3) CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority Meeting Held October 10, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) 3.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 3.3 Approval of Consulting Services Agreement by TRB and Associates, Inc. for On- Call services related to Code Compliance Plan Review and Inspection Services (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) No public comments were submitted. It was moved by Vice Mayor Williams and seconded by Councilmember Shaw to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 4) PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Amend and Restate Resolution Authorizing the City of Oakley to Join the California Statewide Communities Development Authority’s Infrastructure Program (SCIP) (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director) Administrative Services Director Jeri Tejeda presented the staff report. Dr. Fuller mentioned it is his understanding that residents in Emerson Ranch and Delaney Park use this to finance roads, etc. that went in there and now they are paying the assessment fee to the developer. Mrs. Tejeda explained that the assessment fee pays down the bond; it does not go to the developer. Dr. Fuller inquired where it is documented. Mrs. Tejeda explained it is on the property tax bill as with other assessments.

Dr. Fuller inquired about someone becoming ill or unemployed and how it affects the program and what recourse is available. Mrs. Tejeda explained that the City is not on the hook for that assessment, the developer is because they bonded for it. James Hamill, Managing Director, California Statewide Communities Development Authority, explained that there is a forbearance agreement with the property owner in those cases, to provide a payment plan to pay over a longer period of time. Dr. Fuller inquired if property owners would negotiate a forbearance arrangement directly with him and Mr. Hamill confirmed they would. Vice Mayor Williams commented that the developer is the “homeowner” before homes are sold, but the homeowner/developer votes for it so properties are bonded before people purchase them and move in; it keeps the initial purchase price lower, but it is captured on the back end. She inquired if these bonds are forever, and Mr. Hamill explained they are for 30 years. She inquired if a new owner takes it on if someone sells their property and Mrs. Tejeda confirmed that is correct. She commented that she is hearing in the newer neighborhoods that people are being assessed to death, and while it is a real estate agent’s job to disclose fees, she inquired if there is anything the City can do to help disclose. Mrs. Tejeda responded that the City cannot control what is or is not disclosed but if someone wanted to call and speak with the City, staff can help explain what is a City assessment and what is not. Dr. Fuller expressed concern that it is a new tax. He mentioned a house is sold at a lower price without it upfront, but normally it goes into purchase of house and a person can work through it with the mortgage structure. He mentioned he hears all the time about high assessments with new development in the E. Cypress area; some young families relying on their real estate agent and developer, and they may not be fully aware of all involved in purchasing and this adds to the stack of assessments; therefore, he will not vote in favor. Councilmember Shaw shared that she is in a home with horrific assessments and taxes, but she believes it is going to go to the homeowner one way or another whether in the purchase price or assessments. She mentioned she wouldn’t be able to qualify to purchase if it was upfront with the purchase price and she wants to be able to allow people to qualify for a home purchase, so she is reluctantly supporting this. Vice Mayor Williams inquired if there are any statistics on how many homeowners have benefited from this. She expressed that it should benefit residents not developers because they are here to serve residents, not developers. Mrs. Tejeda mentioned she does not have that information tonight but she can talk to the team and see if there is anything to provide. Mayor Meadows commented that a lot of sales he sees come through are people barely getting into homes, it is a stretch with them buying to the maximum of their loan qualification, so if it keeps prices lower, they are probably benefiting. Vice Mayor Williams inquired if there is a cap to the assessment since this is a statewide program and people are barely qualifying to purchase then they have assessments added.

Mayor Meadows mentioned he will not speak to a new purchase, but on a resale, assessments are known. Mr. Hamill responded there is a 2% state cap, but they don’t go above 1.7% because when they sell the bonds on the marketplace, they won’t be able to sell them if too high because they are leveraged too much. Councilmember Henderson commented that the City is already part of this program so the focus here is to discuss staying in the program. Councilmember Shaw agreed the focus is staying in the program and mentioned it is also expanding their reach what is included in the bonds so it can be potentially higher than what they have. It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Councilmember Shaw to adopt the resolution as presented. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) 4.2 Grand Cypress Preserve Development Agreements Master Amendment (DA 01-23) (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Planning Manager Ken Strelo presented the staff report and provided a PowerPoint presentation. Vice Mayor Williams inquired if extending this Development Agreement will not delay E. Cypress Road improvements until development begins and Mr. Strelo confirmed it would not. Dr. Fuller inquired if they keep the same plan/design if it should go until 2045, or if it can be revisited then and be altered. Mr. Strelo explained that home design review is not approved for these projects; the tentative maps are approved with conceptual landscaping, all of which has been analyzed and reviewed in accordance with the East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan conceptual plans, so any future apartments or houses in these developments still need to come to the Council for design review and receive approvals. He explained that they are not locked in yet but if they were, they would run with the Development Agreement. He mentioned at this time, it is only the tentative maps that would remain valid. Mayor Meadows opened the public hearing and called for public comments. A member of the public inquired if developers will be held to meet the current percentage of below market housing in newer developments or if it goes up in future years, if they will be subject to a new percentage. Mr. Strelo explained that this project is not subject to inclusionary housing, or in other words, requiring any below market rate housing. He mentioned if the developer chose to submit an application in the future they would handle that as need be, but at this time, the City uses a special zoning overlay district and in the future, a special zone in order to accommodate Regional Housing Needs Assessment and provide land for affordable housing. He mentioned there is no requirement for affordable housing by these developments. Andrew Han, representative of the development entity, agreed with the staff recommendation and was available for questions.

Mayor Meadows closed the public hearing. It was moved by Vice Mayor Williams and seconded by Dr. Fuller to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 5) REGULAR CALENDAR 5.1 Adopt a Superseding Agreement regarding the reimbursement for and implementation of construction improvements related to the Grand Cypress Preserve project with ACD-TI Oakley, LLC (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report. He mentioned on page 120 of the agenda, in the 4th “Whereas” paragraph of the proposed Resolution, the correct date is April 13, 2022. Vice Mayor Williams inquired when work would be ready to begin. Mr. McMurray mentioned it will probably be at the beginning of next year. He explained that the first reading of the ordinance is waived and introduced tonight but still needs to be adopted if at the Council’s pleasure in November followed by a period of time to request items from the developer and time for the developer to respond, and then the work needs to be bid before they can start construction. Vice Mayor Williams inquired if there will be a lot of communication when they get ready to start the project, so residents are aware. Mr. McMurray confirmed that as with all projects, the public will be informed. He mentioned they want to make sure residents are aware of the investment and priority the Council is placing on this project. Councilmember Henderson inquired about the rough timing of completion of the project. Mr. McMurray mentioned they have 36 months to complete construction, which he believes is more than enough time to complete the improvements. No public comments were submitted. Mayor Meadows read the CEQA determination into the record. Dr. Fuller thanked the developer, TI, and all associated with the project, as well as Mr. McMurray for what they have done for the expansion of E. Cypress. He commented that he wants to be able to say this is what we have been able to do in Oakley. He mentioned he is hearing over and over again in other areas such as San Francisco and Berkeley that we are not doing enough and we are doing it with private capital, not public funds; they are getting results and came to an agreement to have an expansion. He commented that there are other developers they work well with including DeNova (NE corner of Bethel Island and Cypress) that had its own builders remedy, which they didn’t have to abide by because of changes, to have 20% deeded for low and very low housing that will remain that way for 50 years. He explained that they weren’t bound by it because of laws that passed, but they committed to it and to this community. He thanked staff and developers for working together to find solutions.

Councilmember Shaw thanked them for their hard work and mentioned E. Cypress has been a priority of this Council and there is going to be construction but to bear with them as it is for safety. Mayor Meadows shared that this was the first call he got when he was sworn in so it has been a while. It was moved by Councilmember Shaw and seconded by Vice Mayor Williams to adopt the resolution as amended to correct the date. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 6) REPORTS 6.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager (b) Business License Update City Manager Joshua McMurray mentioned the September Business License update has been submitted. He thanked staff for a great Oaktober Fest event. He mentioned next year is the City’s 25th Anniversary and asked the Council to select 2 members informally to sit on a sub- committee with staff to discuss how to celebrate it. Mayor Meadows and Vice Mayor Williams mentioned they would like to serve. Councilmember Shaw expressed interest in serving but that she is happy to bow out if they would rather serve. 6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Dr. Fuller reported he attended the American Legion Post 202 in Brentwood which includes Oakley Veterans for its "Be the One" Dance. He explained that suicide rates are high for veterans and “Be the One” means if you see a veteran in trouble, get a hold of someone to help them. He shared the California Veterans Resource Book and asked City Manager Joshua McMurray if he can get in touch with Roy Manning to place these books in the City’s lobby along with the County Veterans pamphlet and he shared the Veterans crisis line, 9-8-8. He also reported he attended Oaktober Fest where St. Anthony operated wine and beer sales, Oakley Library representatives Liz Fuller and Arnold Fitzpatrick, Jr. were present, and Assemblymember Lori Wilson’s aides were also present. He announced Friday, October 27, 8:45 a.m.-10:00 a.m., is the next Freedom Fuel Cafe at Freedom High School run by its Life Skills class. Vice Mayor Williams reported she attended the APTA Conference where she learned that there are only three bus manufacturers in the U.S. and one just declared bankruptcy; the federal guidelines provide that they can only purchase buses made in the U.S, creating a long waiting line with the other two bus manufacturers; it includes all buses. She shared that the keynote speaker was the head of innovation for Disney and he spoke about creativity, intuition, curiosity, imagination being the most employable skills that everyone has to have and can’t be taken over by A.I. She also shared that she attended a session on transit impact---fostering opportunity and growth in communities, that Los Angeles will host the 2028 Olympics---the first car-free Olympic venue, and she learned about the rapid transit zone---a policy developed to protect a higher

density zone and warehousing and transportation had to go hand-in-hand. She mentioned she learned about helpful tools such as time lapse videos to show residents. She mentioned the CEO of Amtrak was a panelist and he mentioned that 1/3 of Amtrak trips are through commuter rails and he is an advocate of designing cities around transit; and St. Pete’s Florida provides a good footprint for mobility hubs. She mentioned there has been a 140% increase in U.S. home prices over the past 20 years, 30% of it in the past 3 years, with rent increasing 9% over the past year, and wages are clearly not going up at the same rate. She also mentioned that Park City Transit designed affordable housing for their transit employees that was a City project funded by grants and local tax revenue, and with teachers needing housing, it might be a model to look at. She reported she attended the Oakley Chamber of Commerce meeting at Brownstone Gardens where she was the keynote speaker and there was interaction and ideas for businesses, energy, and activity around it, and she is excited they are getting it off the ground. She added that Oleksii is perfect for it with his energy and approach to do it differently. Councilmember Shaw reported she was also at the APTA conference; the vendors were interesting to see how transit is going to meet zero emissions. She also reported she attended the Ironhouse Sanitary District meeting virtually, the reception welcoming for Dr. Pamela Ralston at Los Medanos College, and Oaktober Fest where she obtained a library card with her last name. Mayor Meadows shared that he got his library card a year ago when the Library was on site. He reported he attended the MCE and CCTA meetings last week and Oaktober Fest. (b) Requests for Future Agendas Dr. Fuller requested staff secure a speaker from the Veterans to inform the Council what is happening with Veterans and share some of their hardships. It was supported by Councilmember Shaw. 7) WORK SESSION None. 8) CLOSED SESSIONS 8.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Mayor Aaron Meadows, Vice Mayor Anissa Williams, City Attorney Derek Cole Unrepresented employee: City Manager Joshua McMurray Mayor Meadows announced the closed session and mentioned the meeting will be adjourned following closed session. He provided information regarding the next regular meeting. 9) ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Respectively Submitted, Libby Vreonis City Clerk

Showing the first 24,000 of 277,904 characters. The full document is at the source.

AGENDA REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND SPECIAL MEETING OF THE OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Tuesday, October 24, 2023 6:30 PM Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561. Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065. MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people. VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard. Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road. Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us. A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000. The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing info@ci.oakley.ca.us. If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City 1

Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000. Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video. Information Regarding Public Comment Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/. 1.OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Layla Zaragoza, Summer Lake Elementary School Student) 1.3 Update from Scott Wannamaker, Assistant Fire Chief, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District 1.4 Presentation by Gary Parkhurst, Mount Diablo Interpretive Association, regarding the Mitchell Canyon Educational Center 2.PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items. 3.CONSENT CALENDAR 2

Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Mayor. 3.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority Meeting Held October 10, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Minutes 10-10-23 3.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo 3.3 Approval of Consulting Services Agreement by TRB and Associates, Inc. for On-Call services related to Code Compliance Plan Review and Inspection Services (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Staff Report 1. Draft Resolution 2. Draft Agreement 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Amend and Restate Resolution Authorizing the City of Oakley to Join the California Statewide Communities Development Authority’s Infrastructure Program (SCIP) (Jeri Tejeda, Administrative Services Director) Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Public Testimony, 5) Close the Public Hearing, 6) Deliberate, 7) Summarize the Deliberation 8) Adopt the proposed Resolution Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Exhibits A, B, C, D 4.2 Grand Cypress Preserve Development Agreements Master Amendment (DA 01-23) (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Comments from the Applicant, 5) Receive Public Testimony, 6) Close the Public Hearing, 7) Deliberate, 8) Summarize the Deliberation 9) Waive the First Reading and Introduce the Ordinance 3

CEQA Determination: Find that the project is within the scope of the East Cypress Corridor Specific Plan Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2004092011) certified by the City Council through adoption of Resolution No. 46-09 on March 10, 2009 Staff Report 1. Vicinity Map 2. Notice of Public Hearing 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-23 4. Grand Cypress Preserve Development Agreements Master Amendment 5. Proposed Ordinance 5.REGULAR CALENDAR 5.1 Adopt a Superseding Agreement regarding the reimbursement for and implementation of construction improvements related to the Grand Cypress Preserve project with ACD-TI Oakley, LLC (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Suggested Action: CEQA Determination: Find that approval of the Agreement is not a project as it involves government funding activities per CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14) section 15378(b)(4), and all environmental impacts associated with the Project have been previously analyzed during the Project’s entitlement processes. Staff Report Resolution Approving Superseding TI Capital Reimbursement Agreement Superseding Agreement Regarding Reimbursement and Implementation 6.REPORTS 6.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager (b) Business License Update September 2023 New Business Licenses 6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency (b) Requests for Future Agendas 4

7.WORK SESSION 8.CLOSED SESSIONS 8.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Mayor Aaron Meadows, Vice Mayor Anissa Williams, City Attorney Derek Cole Unrepresented employee: City Manager Joshua McMurray 9.ADJOURN 5

Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority held October 10, 2023 1) OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority Mayor Aaron Meadows called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Councilmembers Dr. George Fuller and Hugh Henderson were also in attendance. Vice Mayor Anissa Williams and Councilmember Shannon Shaw were attending a conference and joined the meeting remotely via teleconference through their location at the 11 th Hour Business Center-Hyatt Regency Orlando, Convention Level-Tower 1, 9801 International Drive, Orlando, Florida 32819. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Dr. Fuller led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 3) CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting Held September 26, 2023 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) 3.2 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 3.3 Award of Construction Contract to TNB Construction for the Main Street Rehabilitation Project at Contra Costa Canal Bridge - Capital Improvement 6

Program (CIP) Number 187 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3.4 Fiscal Year 2023/24 First Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Dr. Fuller requested item 3.4 be pulled. It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Dr. Fuller to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. A roll call vote was taken. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 3.4 Dr. Fuller requested clarification for the record that the action the City Council is taking is to “accept the report”. Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani confirmed it is. It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to accept the report. A roll call vote was taken. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 4) PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 5) REGULAR CALENDAR 5.1 Interview Applicants and Adopt a Resolution Appointing Three Members of the Public to the City of Oakley Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee (Danielle Navarro, Assistant City Manager) Assistant City Manager Danielle Navarro presented the staff report. Carmelia Johnson provided public comment. She shared she is a 3-year resident at The Oaks Apartments and the rent is increasing every year, but repairs are not being done and her complaints are never attended to. She mentioned rent went up again in October to $2,200/month, they are on SSI, and almost all their money goes to rent. Mayor Meadows inquired how many bedrooms are in her unit. Ms. Johnson responded there are three. Mayor Meadows interviewed Oaks Resident Applicants Barbara Bautista, Micheline Nicol, Doug Gamble and Jackie Rider. Applicants were asked how long they have been a resident of The Oaks, what issues/concerns they have as a resident of The Oaks, and what experience/expertise they would bring to the Advisory Committee, and they were provided an opportunity to share anything 7

that would help the Council understand why they would be a good fit for the Advisory Committee. Mayor Meadows thanked everyone who interviewed and applied. He shared that he has been on the property and is aware of some of what is going on. Mayor Meadows mentioned all four applicants did a good job presenting. He recommended Barbara Bautista and Doug Gamble for the Advisory Committee. It was moved by Dr. Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to appoint Barbara Bautista and Doug Gamble as the two Oaks Apartments resident members of the Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee. A roll call vote was taken. AYES: Fuller, Henderson, Meadows, Shaw. NOES: Williams. (4-1) It was moved by Councilmember Henderson and seconded by Dr. Fuller to appoint Oke Johnson as the Oaks Apartments management team member of the Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee. A roll call vote was taken. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) City Attorney Derek Cole clarified that the two votes will be made part of a single resolution that will identify the resident appointees and management appointee to the Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee. 6) REPORTS 6.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager City Manager Joshua McMurray announced Oaktober Fest will be held Saturday, October 21, 1pm-4pm, at Civic Center Plaza. He also announced two new staff members, Troy Faulk, Recreation Manager, and La Sandra Sipp, Human Resources Manager. (b) Business License Update None. 6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Councilmember Henderson reported that he attended a Diablo Water District meeting and Friday Night Bites. 8

Dr. Fuller reported that he met with Contra Costa County Supervisor Diane Burgis on October 2 to discuss AB 1657, SB 555, the 55-acre park, the single- tunnel conveyance project, the regional bond issue pending through BAHFA, and Jersey Island. He provided details on each. Vice Mayor Williams reported she attended a Tri-Delta meeting on September 27 and provided details. Mayor Meadows reported he attended the Mayors Conference Thursday evening of last week. (b) Requests for Future Agendas None. 7) WORK SESSIONS 7.1 Work Session to Discuss AB 1657 (Wicks), SB 555 (Wahab), the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Bay Area Housing Financing Authority (BAHFA) (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report. Dr. Fuller commented that ABAG has been working on AB 1657 since at least 2022. He explained that it was a dream of Mayor Jesse Arreguin in Berkeley because they had a high amount of RHNA units to build and so he was thinking of a bond measure to get RHNA numbers reallocated and get financing to build out in open areas, but Councilmember Mendoza from Brentwood, himself, and Solano County had something to say as they are not in favor of it but overwhelmingly others said they had to take a look at it. He mentioned when he returned to the General Assembly in 2023, Arreguin proudly put it forward that ABAG had Assemblymember Buffy Wicks introduce AB 1657, then a $20 billion bond, now $10 billion, to build affordable housing. He mentioned that within the bill, Health and Safety Code Section 54056 says the legislature can act on and change anything associated with affordable housing with this bill and Townsend, the City’s analyst, said the same. He mentioned that was what motivated Arreguin in 2022 to get out from the RHNA numbers and if this passes, there will be a mechanism in place to do so. He explained that Section 8 came about around the time of Reagan and in result, large housing projects were to disappear, and Section 8 housing was to spread out lower income housing, but since affordable housing has not been built in areas with high RHNA numbers, they want to throw money at it. He commented that since the 1940s, large public housing units have not worked well and should have been eliminated under Section 8, but now they are proposing to throw money at it to build affordable housing in any way they can get it. He mentioned financing under AB 1657 will generate revenue outside the general fund to put in the general fund to pay bonds as they mature which means more taxes for $20 billion of bonds and it 9

punishes Oakley. He explained that Oakley has done what it was supposed to do with RHNA numbers that others deem incredible compared to other cities, and Oakley is not in a position to need money a whole lot to build more affordable housing because Oakley is handling it, but AB 1657 will take it away and punish Oakley. He mentioned he is certain RHNA numbers will come down as when he attended the 2023 General Assembly, no sooner than when Mayor Arreguin sat down, a woman stood up and said they have to pass this because it is the only way to reduce RHNA numbers. He mentioned in his assessment, the way the numbers are reduced are to get the super blue categories along the coast that have a lot of money to donate and get their people in the legislature, and all of a sudden, the RHNA numbers get reallocated in favor of other people when Oakley has done all of its work and then they start taking over local control. He shared that SB 555 establishes the concept of social housing which is different than affordable housing because the legislature says so; it is housing for everybody, and it is in place because there is a homeless problem. He mentioned every study he has read provides that there is no real understanding why homelessness exists. He mentioned the state in 3 years will take housing allocations, review them, and determine where and how housing is to be built, divide up all the land where and how it needs to go, and decide how to get money there and how it will be built. He mentioned that they can change anything under Section 54056 of AB 1657, and this is where he believes it is going to come. He mentioned Vienna, Austria has social housing and there is a highly taxed group; the rich live in nicer housing and pay higher rents, but 40% live in low-income subsidized housing made possible by the higher tax paid by the rich living in nice housing. He compared it to Oakley, if people want a nice, bigger home, it is a luxury, and they may pay a higher property tax for it. He mentioned AB 1657 states $10-$20 billion and the BAHFA regional vote proposed will provide another $20 billion for housing. He mentioned a regional vote will be taken in all 9 counties including SF, Marin, Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara, and if there is a 2/3 vote, they can raise taxes in Contra Costa County even if Contra Costa County votes against it; Contra Costa County will carry a burden to facilitate them. He explained they are paying the same amount as Contra Costa County; however, property tax is highly regressive; the higher your income, property tax rises, but not at the same rate; it is more burdensome on the middle and lower class than higher class for property tax; each resident in each county will be assessed the same amount and he opposes it. He mentioned it will have a large negative impact on Oakley as Oakley has become an inclusive community and has met what it was supposed to meet. He commented that DeNova has come in with a builder’s remedy and has been putting in 20% affordable housing with marketable housing and nice parks, and now, the state is looking to get more money out of Oakley’s pockets which is inequitable, discriminatory, and prejudicial. He mentioned Berkeley does not like it and has lots of good ideas that are progressive for Berkeley and others but some not so good including not changing its name. He added that 10% of BIPOC people have left Berkeley in 10 years and from what Berkeley is doing, they don’t want the people back; they are not going to build housing; they are going to send it out here. He mentioned Chief Beard recently released an article that crime is climbing because criminals are not being held accountable and similarly, the 10

Mayor’s son Anthony expressed in front of the Council that communities are not being held accountable to their RHNA allocations. He mentioned they should be held accountable, the Council should oppose this, and they should find a way to get out of ABAG and establish its own regional area. Vice Mayor Williams suggested this is one to watch. She mentioned there is no point in having a strong letter of opposition as there is no guarantee this will happen, and there is not enough evidence showing a shifting of RHNA numbers; everything is still separated out. She mentioned she is comfortable to take a stance that they don’t want anything to take away from local control. Councilmember Shaw requested clarification if staff is looking for a letter of opposition or providing an update. City Manager Joshua McMurray responded that staff was asked to bring forward a work session, these are the four detailed areas staff was asked to address, and they are looking for direction. Councilmember Shaw commented that she appreciates the work of staff, she understands they don’t want a California Housing Authority as that will not be the way to benefit Oakley the most, but she doesn’t know what they need to do today while these things are being pushed back a little bit. She mentioned that she is willing to hear what the rest of the Council has to say, but right now it is a stalemate. Councilmember Henderson commented that it is important that they continue to focus on local control and as it goes forward, Oakley needs to be at the table when County allocations are made and be involved as much as possible. He mentioned at the state level or county level, he wants to be able to decide as a city and not be told what to do. Mayor Meadows agreed with lot of comments Dr. Fuller made and mentioned he is probably more concerned with SB 555 that did pass than AB 1657 that was suspended. He shared that he has issues with social housing. He provided an example of Richmond that had a Housing Authority until a couple of years ago; they couldn’t manage their own units which is not uncommon when government tries to manage housing. He mentioned that he shared some of the same concerns regarding ABAG which he does not believe has Oakley’s best interest at heart; he doesn’t think Oakley needs to leave ABAG, they need to be at the table, but he has had concerns with ABAG as well as with MTC for many years, even before sitting here. He expressed that with BAHFA, a $10-$20 billion bond measure for Bay Area housing is insane. He mentioned that other regional measures are crammed down on Oakley, its citizens pay for it, and he doesn’t see a benefit in it. He mentioned that MTC is looking at another $20 billion bond measure for transportation 2 years later, therefore, potentially $40 billion in bonds could be passed in the Bay Area in the next 3 years which is insane. He commented that the housing problem in California is the 125 people in Sacramento making laws that make no sense, slow the process, and make it 11

hard to build. He commented that housing has not been added in California in quite a few years which has been a problem. He shared that he believes in free markets; let them work. Dr. Fuller commented that Vice Mayor Williams mentioned to wait, but SB 555 is now law, and it encourages the Housing Authority in 3 years to look at building on state surplus land which is on the Delta and other areas. He suggested they can always oppose all 3 initially and they need to go further than just saying they want to maintain local control; if th

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Budget documentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Oct 24, 2023 - 06:28 PM — Minutes
  • Oct 24, 2023 - 06:28 PM

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: e2b23d32572d55d2574c52bb3a763543. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record