Land Use & Zoning Committee

Tuesday, March 3, 2026 5:00 PM City of Jacksonville 117 W. Duval Street Jacksonville, FL 32202 Agenda - Marked Council Chamber, 1st Floor, City Hall Land Use & Zoning Committee Joe Carlucci, Chair Rory Diamond, Vice Chair Terrance Freeman Randy White Reggie Gaffney, Jr. Raul Arias Rahman Johnson Legislative Assistant: Rebecca Bolton Council Research: Colleen Hampsey, Chief Office of General Counsel: Dylan Reingold, Deputy GC Planning Dept.: Susan Kelly Planning Dept.: Erin Abney Planning Dept.: Kaysie Cox

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 COUNCIL RULE 4.505 DISRUPTION OF MEETING Any person who disrupts a regular meeting of the City Council, standing committees, special or select committees, sub-committees or any other public meeting presided over by a City Council Member may be forthwith barred, removed, or otherwise ejected, in the discretion of the presiding officer, from further attendance at that meeting. If necessary, due to the nature of the disruption, the audience may be cleared from the Council Chambers or meeting location in the discretion of the presiding officer. Any person who refuses to leave the City Council Chamber may be subject to arrest. Disruption of a meeting includes the following types of behaviors: 1) Any form of political campaigning or electioneering regarding a specific candidate or group of candidates in City elections; 2) Impeding the orderly progress of the meeting by shouting, yelling, whistling, chanting, singing, dancing, clapping, foot stomping, snapping fingers, cheering, jeering, using artificial noise makers or musical instruments, waving signs of any size, or engaging in any other display of excessive noise, sounds, or movement; 3) Displaying or waving signs of any sort, except where used to support the speaker’s presentation at the podium, and only where the sign is 21 inches by 21 inches or smaller in size and cannot be displayed in a manner which unreasonably obstructs the view of the dais for any member of the audience, regardless of message; 4) Audible noise from cellphones or other electronic devices; 5) Consumption of alcohol or controlled substances; 6) Making vulgar or offensive remarks or gestures, or using threatening language or gestures, including but not limited to pantomiming discharging a firearm, choking, or throat-cutting; 7) Refusing to stop speaking when his or her time has expired or is otherwise directed by the presiding officer to do so due to disruptive behavior as described herein; 8) Returning to the meeting after having been removed or ejected, or attempting to do so. Page 1 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 Meeting Convened: Meeting Adjourned: Attendance: Pages: Harper Bell-Kimbro Alon McCloud Item/File No. Title History 2025-06301. OPEN PH CONT PH 4/7/26 NO PC REPORTS Applicant: Charles Powell ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Commonwealth Ave, btwn Superior St & McDuff Ave N - (2.01± Acres) - RLD-60 to RMD-B - Charles Powell (R.E. # 056763-0000) (Dist. 9-Clark-Murray) (Nagbe) (LUZ) (PD Deny) 8/26/25 CO Introduced: LUZ 9/3/25 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 9/9/25 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 9/23/25 CO PH Only LUZ PH: 10/7/25, 10/21/25, 11/4/25, 11/18/25, 12/2/25, 1/6/26, 1/21/26, 2/3/26, 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 9/23/25 2025-07242. DEFER (Previously Continued to 4/7/26) Applicant: Joel Arreguin- Aguilar ORD-Q Rezoning at 6926 Garden St, btwn Iowa Ave & Old Kings Rd - (1.04± Acres) - CRO to CN - Joel Arreguin-Aguilar (R.E. # 003968-0010) (Dist. 8-Gaffney, Jr.) (Mehta) (LUZ) (PD & PC Apv) 9/23/25 CO Introduced: LUZ 10/7/25 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 10/14/25 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 10/28/25 CO PH Only LUZ PH: 11/4/25, 1/21/26, 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 10/28/25 Page 2 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-00063. OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE (Conflicting Recommendations) Applicant: Hayden Phillips ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 5735 Morse Ave, 5807 Morse Ave, & 6750 Seaboard Ave, btwn Seaboard Ave & Aline Rd - (9.70± Acres) - LDR to MDR - Kelly Dawn Chatham & Paula Moore (R.E. # 098253-0000, 098253-0200, & 098255-0100) (Appl # L-6068-25C) (Dist. 14-Johnson) (Kelly) (LUZ) (PD Deny) (PC Apv) (Rezoning 2026-7) 1/13/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 1/21/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 1/27/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO PH Add'l 2/24/26 2/24/26 CO PH Cont'd 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 2/10/26 & 2/24/26, 3/10/26 2026-00074. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE (Conflicting Recommendations) Applicant: Hayden Phillips ORD-Q Rezoning at 5735 Morse Ave, 5807 Morse Ave, & 6750 Seaboard Ave, btwn Seaboard Ave & Aline Rd - (9.70± Acres) - RR-Acre to PUD, to Permit a Max of 89 Single Family Units, as Described in the Morse Avenue PUD - Kelly Dawn Chatham & Paula Moore (R.E. # 098253-0000, 098253-0200, & 098255-0100) (Appl # L-6068-25C) (Dist. 14-Johnson) (Cox) (LUZ) (SW CPAC Amd/Apv) (PD Deny) (PC Apv) (Small-Scale 2026-6) 1/13/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 1/21/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 1/27/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO PH Add'l 2/24/26 2/24/26 CO PH Cont'd 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/10/26 & 2/24/26, 3/10/26 Page 3 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-00115. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH AMEND MOVE (w/Condition) Applicant: Hunter Faulkner ORD-Q Rezoning at 2890 University Blvd W, btwn Saint Augustine Rd & Suwanee Rd - (2.15± Acres) - CCG-1 & CRO to PUD, to Permit a Luxury Storage Facility for Personal Property, as Described in the Carriage House San Jose PUD (R.E. # 149679-0000) (Appl # L-6074-25C) (Dist. 5-J. Carlucci) (Cox) (LUZ) (PD & PC Amd/Apv) (Ex-Parte: CMs Arias, Diamond & J. Carlucci) (Small-Scale 2026-10) 1/13/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 1/21/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 1/27/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO PH Add'l 2/24/26 2/24/26 CO PH Cont'd 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/10/26 & 2/24/26, 3/10/26 PLANNING DEPARTMENT & PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITION: 1. Access may be from Fleetwood Road and University Boulevard as described in the PUD application for storage condominiums. Any other use shall have access subject to Development Services Division and Planning Department review and approval on a case-by-case basis. 2026-00156. OPEN PH CONT PH 3/17/26 (At request of CM Gaffney Jr.) Applicant: Brian Small ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Hemlock St, 3640 Hemlock St, 3653 Newcomb Rd & 3707 Newcomb Rd, btwn Newcomb Rd & Hemlock St - (14.17± Acres) - RMD-A to PUD, to Permit a Residential Subdivision to Contain Max of 130 Cottage Home Units, as Described in the Azalea Grove PUD - William Houston Stephens Revocable Trust, William H. Stephens, Newcomb Terrace, LLC, William Leslie Howell & Minnie Lou Howell (R.E. # 019476-0010, 019476-0020, 019487-0000 & 019488-0000) (Dist. 8-Gaffney, Jr.) (Corrigan) (LUZ) (N CPAC Deny) (PD & PC Amd/Apv) 1/13/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 1/21/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 1/27/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO PH Only LUZ PH: 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/10/26 Page 4 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 PLANNING DEPARTMENT & PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITION: 1. The proposed development shall meet the minimum recreation and open space requirements of the 2045 Comprehensive Plan. 2. A traffic study shall be undertaken by the developer upon PUD verification. The methodology of the study shall be determined by the developer’s Traffic Engineer, The Chief of the Transportation Planning (or their designee), and the Chief of Traffic Engineering (or their designee). 3. All roadways shall be privately maintained by property owners in accordance with Sec. 654.111 of the Ordinance Code. 4. Access point locations shall be determined by Development Services and Traffic Engineering Divisions. 5. If the development proceeds as multifamily, guest parking shall be provided even if the required number is reduced. 2026-00227. OPEN PH CLOSE PH AMEND MOVE (Conflicting Recommendations) Applicant: Michael Herzberg ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 9702 Historic Kings Rd, btwn Robin Ln & Lourcey Rd - (1.98± Acres) - LDR to BP - Eduardo Cesar De Santana & Sandra Santana (R.E. # 149120-0012) (Appl # L-6084-25C) (Dist. 5-J. Carlucci) (Sheppard) (LUZ) (PD Deny) (PC Apv) (Rezoning 2026-23) 1/13/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 1/21/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 1/27/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO PH Add'l 2/24/26 2/24/26 CO PH Cont'd 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 2/10/26 & 2/24/26, 3/10/26 AMENDMENT 1. Page 1, Line 11 insert "South" following Historic Kings Road. Page 5 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-00238. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE (Conflicting Recommendations) Applicant: Michael Herzberg ORD-Q Rezoning at 9702 Historic Kings Rd S, btwn Robin Rd & Lourcey Rd - (1.98± Acres) - RLD-70 & RR-Acre to IBP - Eduardo Cesar De Santana & Sandra Santana (R.E. # 149120-0012) (Appl # L-6084-25C) (Dist. 5-J. Carlucci) (Cox) (LUZ) (PD Deny) (PC Apv) (Small-Scale 2026-22) 1/13/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 1/21/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 1/27/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO PH Add'l 2/24/26 2/24/26 CO PH Cont'd 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 2/18/26, 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/10/26 & 2/24/26, 3/10/26 2026-00589. OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE Applicant: Magdiel Gonzalez ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 0 Balmoral Cir N, btwn Balmoral Cir N & Busch Dr - (0.49± Acres) - CGC to LI - Magdiel Gonzalez & Liudmila Baquero (R.E. # 044279-0540) (Dist. 8-Gaffney, Jr.) (Fogg) (LUZ) (PD & PC Apv) (Rezoning 2026-59) 1/27/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/3/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO PH Add'l 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 2/24/26 & 3/10/26 2026-005910. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE Applicant: Magdiel Gonzalez ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Balmoral Cir N, btwn Balmoral Cir N & Busch Dr - (0.49± Acres) - CCG-1 to IL - Magdiel Gonzalez & Liudmila Baquero (R.E. # 044279-0540) (Dist. 8-Gaffney, Jr.) (Nagbe) (LUZ) (PD & PC Apv) (Small-Scale 2026-58) 1/27/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/3/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO PH Add'l 3/10/26 LUZ PH: 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/24/26 & 3/10/26 Page 6 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-006011. OPEN PH CONT PH 3/17/26 NO PD/PC REPORTS Applicant: Paul Harden ORD-Q Rezoning at 10028 Heckscher Dr, East of Heckscher Dr & North of Ft. George Rd - (1.28± Acres) - CCG-2 to PUD, to Permit Commercial Storage Facility, Generally, for Family & Personal Use, but Commercial in Nature, as Described in the 10028 Heckscher Drive PUD - Jorge Rivera (R.E. # 169158-0010) (Dist. 2-Gay) (Cox) (LUZ) 1/27/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/3/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/10/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO PH Only LUZ PH: 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/24/26 2026-008312. DEFER (PH Next Cycle 3/17/26) ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 0 Zoo Pkwy, btwn Busch Dr N & Eastport Rd - (42.58± Acres) - WD-WR to LI - Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville, LLC (R.E. # 108816-0030 (Portion)) (Appl # L-6093-25C) (Dist. 2-Gay) (Fogg) (LUZ) (Rezoning 2026-84) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 3/10/26 & 3/24/26 2026-008413. DEFER (PH Next Cycle 3/17/26) ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Zoo Pkwy, btwn Busch Dr N & Eastport Rd - (42.58± Acres) - IW to IL, Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville, LLC (R.E. # 108816-0030 (Portion)) (Appl # L 6093-25C) (Dist. 2-Gay) (Batteh) (LUZ) (Small-Scale 2026-83) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/10/26 & 3/24/26 Page 7 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-008514. DEFER (PH Next Cycle 3/17/26) ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 5975 Park St, btwn Ellis Rd S & Snug Harbour Ln - (0.64± Acres) - PBF to LDR - Millennial Christian Schools, Inc. (R.E. # 067222-01000 (Portion)) (Appl # L-6094-26C) (Dist. 9-Clark-Murray) (Sheppard) (LUZ) (Rezoning 2026-86) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 3/10/26 & 3/24/26 2026-008615. DEFER (PH Next Cycle 3/17/26) ORD-Q Rezoning at 5975 Park St, btwn Ellis Rd S & Snug Harbour Ln - (0.64± Acres) - PBF-2 to RLD-60, Millennial Christian Schools, Inc. (R.E. # 067222-01000 (Portion)) (Appl # L-6094-26C) (Dist. 9-Clark-Murray) (Nagbe) (LUZ) (Small-Scale 2026-85) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/10/26 & 3/24/26 2026-008716. DEFER (PH Next Cycle 3/17/26) ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Mccargo St N, btwn Nevada St & Driggers St - (1.82± Acres) - RR-Acre to RLD-60 - Ryrad Home Builders, Inc. (R.E. # 006093-0010) (Dist. 12-White) (Nagbe) (LUZ) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/10/26 Page 8 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-008817. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE Applicant: Travis Moss ORD-Q Apv the Waiver of Min Required Road Frontage at 0 Dillon St, btwn Summer St & Day Ave - MM Homes of Jax, LLC - Req to Reduce the Min Rd Frontage Requirements from 48 ft to 40 ft in RLD-60 (R.E. # 057013-0020) (Dist. 9-Clark-Murray) (Martin) (LUZ) (PD Apv) (Companion 2026-89) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO PH Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/24/26 2026-008918. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE Applicant: Travis Moss ORD-Q Granting Administrative Deviation (Appl AD-26-07) at 0 Dillon St, btwn Summer St & Day Ave - MM Homes of Jax, LLC - Req to 1) Reduce the Required Min Lot Area From 6,000 sq ft to 4,205 sq ft, 2) Reduce the Min Lot Width From 60 ft to 40 ft, in RLD-60 (R.E. # 057013-0020) (Dist. 9-Clark-Murray) (Martin) (LUZ) (PD Apv) (Companion 2026-88) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO PH Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 2/24/26 2026-009119. OPEN PH CLOSE PH MOVE ORD Adopt a Modification to the City’s 2045 Comp Plan for the Purpose of Updating the 5-Yr Capital Improvements Schedule of Projs Within the Capital Improvements Element (Reingold) (Req of Mayor) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: F, LUZ 2/18/26 F Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO PH Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH: 3/3/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch. 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.604 - 2/24/26 Page 9 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-010720. EX-PARTE OPEN PH CLOSE PH AMEND MOVE Applicant: Michael Herzberg RESO-Q Concerning the Appeal Filed by Michael Herzberg of the Final Order Issued by the Planning Commission Denying Appl for Minor Modification to Appvd PUD, MM-25-16, Req to Revise the Site Plan to Allow Personal Property Storage for the Propty Located at 2675 Starratt Rd & 14734 Yellow Bluff Rd, at the NW Corner of Starratt & Yellow Bluff Rds, Pursuant to Sec 656.141, Ord Code; Adopt Recommended Findings & Conclusions of the LUZ Committee (R.E. # 106201-0010 & 106205-0010) (Dist. 8-Gaffney, Jr.) (Reingold) (LUZ) 2/10/26 CO Introduced: LUZ 2/18/26 LUZ Read 2nd & Rerefer 2/24/26 CO Read 2nd & Rerefer LUZ PH-3/3/26 AMENDMENT: 1. Grant the Appeal or Deny the Appeal 2026-012221. 2ND READING ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 0 Old Kings Rd, btwn Acree Rd & Plummer Rd - (5.7± Acres) - AGR to LDR- Sandcastle Capital Holdings, LLC (R.E. # 002547-0002) (Appl # L-6091-25C) (Dist. 8-Gaffney Jr.) (Read) (LUZ) (Rezoning 2026-123) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 2026-012322. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Old Kings Rd, btwn Acree Rd & Plummer Rd - (5.7± Acres) - AGR to PUD, to Permit Single-family Dwellings, as Described in the Old Kings Rd Manufactured Home PUD - Sandcastle Capital Holdings, LLC (R.E. # 002547-0002) (Appl # L-6091-25C) (Dist. 8-Gaffney Jr.) (Cox) (LUZ) (Small-Scale 2026-122) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 Page 10 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-012423. 2ND READING ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 0 Rampart Rd, btwn Collins Rd & Park City Dr - (25.55± Acres) - MDR to BP - Collins Rd Properties I, LLC (R.E. # 015912-2800 (Portion)) (Appl # L-6079-25C) (Dist. 14-Johnson) (Read) (LUZ) (Rezoning 2026-125) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 2026-012524. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Rampart Rd, btwn Collins Rd & Park City Dr - (25.55± Acres) - PUD (2021-736-E) to PUD, to Permit Industrial Business Park & Office Uses, as Described in the Rampart & Collins PUD - Collins Rd Properties I, LLC (R.E. # 015912-2800 (Portion)) (Appl # L-6079-25C) (Dist. 14-Johnson) (Corrigan) (LUZ) (Small-Scale 2026-124) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 2026-012625. 2ND READING ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 6919 Pitts Rd, btwn New Kings Rd & Moncrief-Dinsmore Rd - (1.88± Acres) - LDR to CCG- Fluffy Buttons, LLC (R.E. # 003916-0020) (Appl # L-5928-24C) (Dist. 8-Gaffney Jr.) (Read) (LUZ) (Rezoning 2026-127) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 2026-012726. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 6919 Pitts Rd, 10650 New Kings Rd, & 0 New Kings Rd, btwn New Kings Rd & Moncrief Rd - (5.55± Acres) - RR-Acre & CCG-2 & PUD, to Permit the Operation of an Auto Sales Company, Primarily Operating as an Online Sales Company on the Property, as Described in the Pitts Road Auto PUD- Fluffy Buttons, LLC (R.E. # 003905-0000, 003906-0000 & 003916-0020) (Appl # L-5928-24C) (Dist. 8-Gaffney Jr.) (Corrigan) (LUZ) (Small-Scale 2026-126) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 Page 11 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-012827. 2ND READING ORD Adopting a Small-Scale Amendmnt to the FLUM Series of the 2045 Comp Plan at 2124, 2144, 2200, & 2220 Southside Blvd, btwn Southside Service Rd & Corporate Sq Blvd - (4.43± Acres) - LDR to BP- Orion Christopher Likins and Miriam Margaret Templeman, (R.E. # 123392-0000, 123393-0000, 123394-0000, & 123395-0000) (Appl # L-6090-25C) (Dist. 4 -Carrico) (Tremante) (LUZ) (Rezoning 2026-129) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Sec 163.3187, F.S. & Ch 650, Pt 4, Ord Code - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 2026-012928. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 2124, 2144, 2200, & 2220 Southside Blvd, btwn Southside Service Rd & Corporate Sq Blvd - (4.43± Acres) - RLD-60 to IBP, - Orion Christopher Likins and Miriam Margaret Templeman (R.E. # 123392-0000, 123393-0000, 123394-0000, & 123395-0000) (Appl # L-6090-25C) (Dist. 4-Carrico) (Nagbe) (LUZ) (Small-Scale 2026-128) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 & 4/14/26 2026-013029. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Beach Blvd & 12226 Beach Blvd, btwn Pemberton St & Sans Pareil St - (1.32± Acres) - PUD (2001-608-E) to PUD, to Permit an Establishment or Facility Which Includes the Retail Sale of All Alcoholic Beverages, Not in Conjunction With a Restaurant, Including Liquor, Beer or Wine for on-premises Consumption or Off-premises Consumption, as Described in the Sans Pareil Property PUD - Sans Pareil Property, LLC (R.E. # 166249-0000 & 166250-0000) (Dist. 3-Lahnen) (Abney) (LUZ) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 Page 12 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-013130. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 880 & 950 US 301 Hwy S, btwn US 301 Hwy S & US 301 Bypass Hwy S - (7.05± Acres) - CCG-1 & CCG-2 to PUD, , to Permit a Convenience Store With Vehicle and Truck Fueling Stalls and to Maintain the Existing Warehouse Use, as Described in the Highway 301 PUD - 880 US Hwy 301, LLC, Charles Douglas Moore Life Estate, Dana Michelle Moore Gautreaux, Kendra Ann Moore Baudoin, Harold Robert Mosley, & Wesley Mosley Jr. (R.E. # 000886-0010 & 000886-0015) (Dist. 12-White) (Cox) (LUZ) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 2026-013231. 2ND READING ORD-Q Apv the Waiver of Min Required Road Frontage (Appl WRF-26-03) at 0 Utsey Rd, W of Utsey Rd & N of Moncrief Rd W - Dexter Bennett - Req to Reduce the Min Road Frontage Requirements from 160 ft to 0 ft in RR-Acre (R.E. # 002938-0030) (Dist. 12-White) (Cox) (LUZ) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/10/26 2026-013332. 2ND READING ORD-Q Rezoning at 0 Sherrington St, btwn Clifton St & Olustee St - (0.11± Acres) - RLD-60 to RMD-A - K3 Advantages, LLC (R.E. # 048162-0010) (Dist. 10-Pittman) (Nagbe) (LUZ) (Companion 2026-134) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 2026-013433. 2ND READING ORD-Q Granting Administrative Deviation (Appl AD-26-14) at 0 Sherrington St, btwn Clifton St & Olustee St - K3 Advantages, LLLC - Req to Reduce the Side Yard Setback From 10 ft to 5 ft, as Defined and Classified Under the Zoning Code (R.E. # 048162-0010) (Dist. 10-Pittman) (Nagbe) (LUZ) (Companion 2026-133) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 4/7/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/24/26 Page 13 of 14

Land Use & Zoning Committee Agenda - Marked March 3, 2026 2026-013534. 2ND READING ORD-Q Apv Sign Waiver (Appl SW-26-01) at 6780 Ricker Rd, at the NW Corner of the Intersection of Morse Ave & Ricker Rd - KRD Yazji Properties, Inc.- Req to Reduce the Min Setback from 10 ft to 4 ft in CN (R.E. # 015780-0010) (Dist. 14-Johnson) (Mehta) (LUZ) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: LUZ LUZ PH: 3/17/26 Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/10/26 2026-013735. 2ND READING ORD Relating to the Council Rules; Amend Council Rules 2.202 (Attendance; Voting) & 2.210 (Rules in Committee), Pt 2 (Committee Procedure), Ch 2 (Committees), Council Rules, to Address Council Member Attendance & Auth Absences for Standing Committee Meetings & the Required Quorum for Council Standing Committees; Amend Council Rule 4.106 (Quorum), Pt 1 (Meetings; Quorum), Ch 4 (Procedures), Council Rules, to Address Council Member Attendance & Auth Absences for Council Meetings; Estab a Prospective Date of 7/1/26, for the Council Rule Amends Prov Herein to Become Effective (Staffopoulos) (Introduced by CM Boylan) 2/24/26 CO Introduced: NCSPHS, R, TEU, F, LUZ Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 3/10/26 NOTE: The next regular meeting will be held Tuesday, March 17, 2026. *****Note: Items may be added at the discretion of the Chair.***** Pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act, accommodations for persons with disabilities are available upon request. Please allow 1-2 business days notification to process; last minute requests will be accepted; but may not be possible to fulfill. Please contact Disabled Services Division at: V 904-255-5466, TTY-904-255-5476, or email your request to KaraT@coj.net. Page 14 of 14

>> All right. It is 5 o'clock. We're going to go ahead and get started here. Welcome to the land use and Zoning Committee. It's MARCH 3rd at 5 o'clock. >> We will. Wait for a few other committee members. We're going to start we do have a quorum. We're going to start with introductions on the left. Thank you. Might gay just visiting? All Joe Carlucci to survive. Well, where is district 11? Room in a large group. One Ronnie White District, 12 don't wrangle with the Office of General Counsel. >> Suzann Kelly Planned Department Aaron at planning department. Casey Cox, planning department. All right. >> And we also have 2 pages tonight. Y'all can go ahead and stand up. We have Harper Bell Kimbro and >> along McLeod. Welcome them. >> They are here to assist us tonight. So thank you for being here. All right. As we were Johnson, thank you. You need to check in with just check you. And it's good. All right. So we'll go ahead on the first agenda item for tonight. Actually, MR. Gay, do you have the? Request in to get move? Something moved up. I think we had an e-mail from your office. Is that correct? >> is chair was a it's actually a 20. Yes, please. If that's possible. Okay. Yeah. We're told Rob as we would accommodate that. So we certainly will. Alright committee members. That means we're going to start on Page 9 of 13 with item 20. Everybody ready. We're starting fast pace. So item number 2020, 26 107 council members. Please declare any ex parte communication have this time. Here we go. And welcome Councilmember Gaffney. Just to bring him up to speed that we go to x We are starting on item number 20, the appeal to accommodate council Monday and the other applicants. So with that, we're going to clear ex parte counselor Johnson, you're recognized. Yeah, my problems today. Ready to turn mic off. Okay. For some reason I don't. >> The agreement on a new I thank you, MISTER Chair. I rise declare ex parte for this legislation. >> I've had 17 e-mails all in opposition. >> To the appeal, I've also got a phone call yesterday from MR. Hertzberg asking if I had any information and then I called over to the planning commission because it had some questions and pull their transcript. All of that is being filed with legislative services. Thank you. Alright, councilmember White. You're recognized as a clear export. Follow my emails has been filed. >> And I did have a meeting with her. Should MISTER Hirshberg? I had some questions from original book 20 years ago and what they was really add to that and all that will be filed. Thank you. Councilmember areas. >> Yes, MISTER Chair. I like the clerics 3, 3, today I met with MISTER Hertzberg, my office to discuss the a p o and I've also received numerous emails in opposition as well. Thank you. Alright has been a You're recognized. Thank Chair also led the class part help the em. >> not sure. Today Michigan also received e-mails from constituents. Also spoke on the stars the numbers of the constituents also rolled out to the site and meet with MISTER Jason Wright. I should I go with legislative Thank you. Alright. Councilmember Fame recognizes thank you, MISTER Chair. I would like to declare ex parte as well for all of the same reasons. My colleague said >> with the applicant and I've received e-mails. Thank you so much. >> All right. And I have expected a clarinet with MR. My crews yesterday and our city Council and we've also received the same number of emails in opposition. And we will get this paperwork filed legislative services with that. We're going to open public hearing and get a staff report or do we not have set for sunsets, MR. Angled, so little bit different. So what I'm going to do is I'm just going heat up with just how we got here. And then we're going to hear from MR. Herzberg, then we're going to hear from Aaron Abney and then a public comment and then a final rebuttal and we'll go from there. >> Okay. Great be amazing. >> So first off, this really started. There was an original pd approve many years And what happened was MR. Hirst Berg representing the property owner had filed for a minor modification to that pd. That was heard on JANUARY 8th 2026 by the Planning Commission at that meeting Planning Commission information and comments from the public and voted to deny the minor Modric West. MR. Hirshberg on behalf of the property owner had filed an appeal of that denial of the odd to the city council and to Easy committee. And with that, that's how we have the appeal and how it got there. So with that, I'm going to turn it back over the chair and I am assuming we will hear from MISTER Hirshberg. >> Okay. And we go to MR. Herzberg and then is at me and then we go to public comment or public hearing cards. Yes, I think that would be appropriate. Okay, MR. Herzberg you are first and you're recognized for 5 minutes Avenue. You have 5 minutes as well. And then we will go to the rest of our speaker cards. >> MR. Members of the committee, thank you, Mike Herzberg for the applicant subject property was actually zoned almost 20 years ago now in 2007 and this spelled out various uses specifically one of those, including personal property storage establishments, self storage as a permitted use anywhere within the pd. The original pd was made up of 5 parcels compass approximately 12 acres. Bpd also noted that the site plan was conceptual and you can see the site plan that was actually approved. I'm super imposed some things on top of it. But that site plan that's on the first page of the document that you're receiving. He's actually the site plan that was approved as part of the pd. Keeping in mind, it was deemed conceptual. One could look at that and determine that. I'm not really sure what that was. It might be a retail center. It might be warehouses. It might be something else. It's somewhat unclear. In any U.S. Get any event. The request for minor modification. That was sought was not an entitlement. This was not a request to allow use that otherwise wasn't allowed. >> Rather, it was changing the site plan the uses allowed by right as staff will tell you again. Similar uses that were allowed by writing this pd would be automotive repair or liquor stores which could be built here tomorrow. In looking at that, you'll see 2 different colors on that. The first color, the yellow is the first parcel that the property owner sought and obtained. That was about 4.3 acres. He put that under contract is due diligence and immediately was granted a verification substantial compliance which is attached at the back of your hand out. That verification says that as of today, the plane department has approved that he has the right to commence building 522 self storage units on the 4.3 acres. As he did that and got his approval and get ready, go to engineering the land or in the green who also knew the landowner and yellow said I would like to show my courage well. Would you be interested in purchasing the additional 1.9 acres? So yes, I can expand the project. Goes forward. Puts that under contract turns in a verification substantial compliance to add some additional units to that, which will see further back in the handout that I've got the last page, area in green again. And the planning department said, you know what, we probably better get a minor modification for this. We'd like to evaluate the access points, make sure that the pd is still consistent in going to the planning Commission. The Planning Commission simply misapplied the law. The requirement here was not whether or not the self storage could be here and really whether or not any additional trips are being created. The answer to that is no. Vastly reduce number of trips for self storage bin for will be there with retail in retail. You might have between 8 11,000 trips. If you were to build out this pd as a retail facility, this all stories that's being proposed and about 6 of the 12 acres generate about 47 daily trips. That's us. Huge margin. And one of the things that was most clear with the those in opposition was traffic in the area. I'm here to tell you the people that live in this area, I completely understand your plight. I understand their problem. And I do think there's an issue at the intersection. However, this pd was approved almost 20 years ago, the neighborhood to our east that's complaining about this use was only approved in 2020. So the residences came to the area for entitled piece of Property and contest the use. That's being being designed or being intended. There to me, I think that's the problem. If you look at the planning of all the departments report, they recommended approval of this minor modification. They found favorably on all criteria and the Treasury are included in my report to you tonight. I think if you evaluate those criteria. And you consider what was done, what's being sought here is appropriate. And while the unfortunate that might not be the use, they'd like to have here, arguably, it might be better than some of the uses that could otherwise be put here. And I understand they'd like to have a nice shopping center or something else. But the property owner has rights just as these folks have rights to build what is allowed under their zoning and applicable for that property. With that, sir. All stand by. >> Okay. Next, we will have MISS >> Thank you, Erin. And chief of current planning. So this is the appeal for minor modification in them. 25 16, which is requesting to modify apd that was approved in 2007 that ordinance 2007, 0, 3, 8, 2, updating the site plan to reflect the proposed development, personal property storage facility with a proposed maximum square footage of approximately 85,000 square feet covering 2 parcels within the pd. Between the 2 parcels. This modification is for approximately 6 acres of the 12.2 2 acres that were approved within the overall pd. Pt was approved to allow for a wide variety of commercial uses and retail uses, including personal property storage facility with an overall maximum development of 105 square feet. That would include both the commercial and retail development space. Their original conceptual site plan depicted commercial uses near the center of the end of the entire pd on one of the parcels. And also included multiple out parcels with driveway connections along both Yellow Bluff and Stair Road and then also included internal cross access connections. The updated site plan for the proposed development would move the northern driveway access point along Yellow Bluff and also removes cross access between the remaining out parcels. It combines 2 of the parcels into one for a combined development of one personal property storage facility. Staff reviewed the request and found that it met the criteria in order to Florida recommendation of approval for the mine up with a minor modification. There were no changes to any of their proved land permitted uses, which does include the personal property storage facility. And there's not a request to increase the floor area. The pd allows for again, a maximum of 105 square, 105,000 square feet and the proposed facility will be closer to approximately 85,000 sales square feet. So they're still square footage remaining when now other out parcels eventually do get developed for the other uses that are allowed within the pd. There's no significant alteration to the general distribution of traffic within the proposed changes due to those driveway. Connections. The proposed site plan was reviewed by both the traffic reviewer in development services and the Transportation Division which had no concerns on the driveway, layout. The proposed changes are significant. Did decrease in the traffic generation. As with the proposed storage facility square footage in unit count, this business would generate approximately 113 daily trips. And if we ran the allowed square footage of 105 square feet for just general commercial or retail uses, it could produce around 6,800 Square, a 6,800 daily trips, which is a significant increase compared to the proposed development of just the personal property storage facility. This portion of Yellow Road is currently operating at 29% capacity and Sterrett Road is operating at 37% capacity. And there's no changes any of the conditions that were enacted by City Council. There's no changes to any of the perimeter buffering, fencing or landscaping. So therefore, we found external compatibility was maintained. Condition. 2 of the original pd requires at a minimum 10 foot wide, 10 foot wide buffer between an complimentary use is adjacent to zoned properties or uses. So this will be required along the northern property boundary. However, we do want to note that while the property to the north is Zoned r Acre. It is owned by and is operating as a power line facility. Condition for of the original pd. Also will be complied with as a 15 foot wide natural landscape. Buffer will be provided along Yellow Bluff right of way. And and it's labeled on the site such that. So that condition will also be maintained. There's no changes any of the premier lot sizes or building height. So therefore, external compatibility is maintained. Pt was always contemplated for commercial uses. There's no residential use is allowed. So there's no changes to any lot sizes that could be along the perimeter and then the high will meet other requirements of the pd today. So because of these reasons and those listed in the staff report, the Planning Department, 48 or recommendation of approval for the minor modification. As Dillon explain this application was heard by Planning Commission on JANUARY 8th where there were several speakers in opposition. They cited concerns related to increase in traffic, especially near the intersection of Yellow Bluff and stare. It where there has been several car accidents that have occurred. I'm almost finished. >> Yeah, car accidents have occurred. Concerns also included that the community felt the pd approval from 2007 was not reflective of the development within the area today, which is mostly residential and did not find that the personal storage was appropriate and compatible with the existing development that's out there today. Several member of the planning Commission felt the use of personal property storage was not was not on the least was on a lease. Intense uses allowed within the p u t and understands the entitlements of the uses that have been allowed on that property since 2007. So they felt that the propose use in the site plan, we're consistent incompatible. One of the commissioners, Commissioner Carter voiced concerns that the area is not the same. Then it was in 2007 when their original pd was approved and had concerns on the reduction in driveway, connections for Ingress and egress and traffic could be significant. The significantly altered with just the one entrance along Sterrett. But ultimately the commission voted to deny the minor modification of vote. 43 and I'm here for any additional questions that you have okay. All right. >> Just to recap, before we go to all those speaker cards, i just want to make sure that all the committee members understand MR. Angled correctly, the modern modification that just because the planning Commission. And I got tonight at Planning Commission planning Department issued a recommendation of approval. And when everyone when anyone wants to appeal something that just goes the Planning Commission, they appeal l u z and full Council. That's where we're at. Okay, cool. Just making sure everyone's kind of phone along. So with that, we will go to our speaker cards. We have. And if you all want want to call your name in, come down to the front row. We have Blake Adams, Robert McFeely, Ruth Nelson, People's Rita Sweat and Susan Chun, a go. Come on down, take your seats on the front row and everyone to get 3 minutes. First up Blake Adams. And before MISTER Adams starts, I'll just remind the committee this is a de novo review. So all the new information comes in today is is very valid. >> pickleball to to the the appeal. And is there any scope that this has to stay within? It's just the criteria for a minor mind. So you have the same criteria that the planning Commission considered. You're just hearing it on mp. Okay, great. MR. Adams. Good Morning Committee are good afternoon Commission. My name is Blake Adams. I worked for Florida Department of Law Enforcement. Has your regional legal adviser here. So we handle everything from Nassau down to Levy. >> I was the state attorney for 10 years prior to that, I I'm not gonna put my address on the record because it is exempt. However, I will let you know I do live in this affected area as such. You've kind of already heard some of the main concerns last time at the committee. I did speak at that as well. Some of the main concerns were that this was owns 20 years ago. And as you all know, this community has changed. Many of you, I'm sure have been on committees that have approved all of the residential neighborhoods around there as such. We don't need more storage units. Somebody I remember at the last hearing they brought up several people brought up maps to show that I believe that within just a few feet from these communities, we have 8 of them already. We're inundated with storage units in this general area from the freeway down to Main Street. We have so many another big concern like they said was the small one-lane roads with increasing can just congestion as we get large moving trucks coming up and down. I don't know if any of you have ever driven on sterrett around 5 o'clock at night. But if you do, you will sit at the light at Sterrett Yellow Bluff for anywhere from 25 to 30 minutes trying to make a left-hand turn. It is terrible. And if that is where the entrance to this is going to be. When trip we're gonna have to wait for trucks to get through a gate to get in there for security reasons which only gonna cause worse traffic. You're gonna have people fleeing are going around these trucks and it's going to cause even more car accidents at this area. Another thing that was brought up was low income property that attracts nuisances as many of, you know, unfortunately, the reality of storage units are that they do attract crime. There are things that are held and then that shouldn't be held in them. And there's not a lot that is done. Law enforcement jso fdle, we do our best to try and prevent that as much as we can. We can only do so much. The fact is it's going to attract nuisances. Another thing that was brought up that I think is incredibly important is the light pollution that will be created by this. This if this is created, this is going to be a large-scale outdoor low-income property. It is going to have light 24 7 to allow entry for people to get into these. I was going to cause so much light pollution for the residents that live directly across to in multiple directions. Another concern with that is that I noticed people are gonna say, well, you already have a gas station right there on the corner and you have another thing. They actually turn the lights off after 10 o'clock and in the gas station lights to to allow for this. The circle for what? I think it's a dollar general, the actually rigged. They turn their lights off and the gas station reduces its lights to help with the light pollution. I'm running out of time here. So I will just say that I don't think the committee got it wrong. They were correct. This isn't a small minor modification. This large modification if I could have just a few right hands. >> No, sir, I'm sorry. We can't allow that. But I we appreciate your comments next. We have MR. Mcfeely. >> Good Evening Council. I'm here to voice my opposition to it to appeal Twenty-twenty 6, 107. I like to highlight several direct conflicts with the future land use element as I did in the print out. This case is before you because the planning commission denied the applicant's request to modify the existing put to allow personal property storage facility. The applicant is now asking to overturn that decision. The issue today is not whether the committee might have reach a different conclusion issues whether the Planning Commission an was supported by competent, substantial evidence and consistent with the comprehensive plan adopted framework which it was at first it was presented as a minor modification. However, the original pecans, but it active commercial development. The long-term vision of this corridor replacing that development pattern with a large cell storage facility is not technical refinement. It's a fundamental change in land use function and long-term outcome. Minor modifications are intended for layout adjustments and dimensional changes, not force a student, entirely different commercial model that permanently alters the economic character of the site. The Planning Commission correctly recognize that distinction. Second commission properly considered consistency with the comprehensive plan and the intent of the cgc. The flu emphasizes efficient use of commercial land, reinforcement of active corridors and protection of long-term development opportunity, a self storage facility does not mean cleat advance those objectives. It generates minimal point limited limited daily activity and commits commercial designated land to static use. The argues that this uses less attendant attentive retail. But reduced traffic is not the standard planning. Decisions are not based solely on trip counts. The comprehensive plan requires optional compatibility and advancement of long-term land use goals, not merely compliance. 3rd granting this appeal would weaken the integrity of the putt process. It would signal that substantial shifts in development kinds can be achieved through a minor modification rather than to the higher level of review, which is required for major changes. The planning Commission. That's right. The 3rd. 3rd, this appeal weakens the the planning commission will review the evidence appealed the correct standards and determined this proposal was inconsistent with the intent to development pattern. There was no showing of legal error, arbitrary action or lack of evidentiary support in closing. One has asked why this applicant is so persistent. Moving forward with this proposal in both the community and the Planning Commission have clearly indicated that it does not align with the adopted vision for this corridor. An appeal should not be used to bypass this process. For this reason. I respectfully urge you to request the nie the appeal of all the Planning Commission's decision. Thank you. >> All right, next we have Ruth Nelson peoples. >> Good evening. My name is Ruth Nelson. People's my addresses on file when this storage unit proposal was approved on AUGUST 5th 2026 by city planner Hadsell from retail space to storage units. It was for 522 units. Representative Hertzberg tried to tell us it was 550 units, but that is not what the documents show. Now we're being told the applicant wants to expand. The footprint at additional line land and increase the number to 650 units. Almost 130 units, more them was approved on AUGUST. 5th. This is not a minor modification. This is a significant intensification of use unit code Section 6, 5, 6, to 3, 4, 0, apd is intended to produce superior site design compatibility with surrounding properties, thoughtful, unified planning. It is supposed to provide greater protection and predictability for a community, not incremental expansion after the fact if there were already concerns about compatibility security, oversight and land use impacts at 522 units. Those concerns intensify was 650 units. We're talking about an unmanned facility with no on-site supervision. Security is provided only by cameras. There are no guarantee business hours and no onsite staff, no on-site staff. These type units are frequently used by landscaping companies, painting contractors, aut