POLISCOPE

The public record

OAKLEY (CONTRACOSTA COUNTY)Decisions and attributed speech publishedPartial coverage

May 21, 2024 - 03:57 PM

Tuesday, May 21, 2024 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

May 21, 2024 - 03:57 PM

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record and a transcript or captions are published for this meeting.

People and votes

Commissioner Dr. Fuller

1 statement

  1. Statement

    Commented on pages 820-824 regarding disadvantaged communities. He.

    Official record

What people said

Attributed speechA separate authority lane. Speech is evidence of what a person said, never of what the board decided.
  • The official minutes identify speakers and topics, but summarize rather than quote their exact words.

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Aug 3, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

This source published text without speaker turns, so speakers and timestamps are not shown.

>> GOOD EVENING. THIS IS THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL AND THE OAKLEY PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER AT 4:00. ROLL CALL. COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. >> HERE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER FULLER. >> HERE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER MEADOWS. >> HERE. >> CHAIR CHUIKO. >> PRESENT. >> VICE CHAIR VERDUZCO. >> PRESENT. >> COMMISSIONER KRIEG. >> HERE. >> COMMISSIONER RAMIREZ. >> HERE. >> VICE MAYOR SHANNON SHAW. I'M PRESENT. MAYOR WILLIAMS AND COMMISSIONER PRICE ARE ABSENT. WE'RE GONNA GO INTO ITEM TWO, WHICH IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE JOIN ME. ALL RIGHT, WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM THREE, WHICH IS PUBLIC COMMENTS. AT THIS TIME, PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE HEARD FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. I DO NOT HAVE ANY PUBLIC SPEAKER CARDS SUBMITTED. TO SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD LOCATED IN THE LOBBY AND SUBMIT IT TO A CITY CLERK. THE TIME LIMIT TO SPEAK IS THREE MINUTES. THE TIME LIMIT IS MONITORED BY THE TIMER LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE MAYOR'S SEAT. WHEN ONE MINUTE REMAINS ON THE TIMER, IT WILL BEEP ONCE AS A REMINDER TO COMPLETE COMMENTS BEFORE YOUR TIME EXPIRES. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM ANY APPLAUSE, CHEERING, BOOING, OR OTHER OUTBURSTS SO THAT EVERYONE MAY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. NOTE THAT DUE TO PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW, THE COUNCIL MAY NOT ENGAGE IN DIALOGUE REGARDING COMMENTS. STAFF MAY BE DIRECTED TO RESPOND TO PERSONS MAKING PUBLIC COMMENTS. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMMENT CARDS, AND I DO NOT HAVE ANY ONLINE COMMENTS. SO IF THERE IS NOBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD WISH TO SPEAK, WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON TO ITEM FOUR, WHICH IS A WORK SESSION. THIS IS ADOPT A RESOLUTION FINDING THE PROPOSED 2024-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 65401 AND 65402 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON, VICE MAYOR SHAW, CHAIR CHUIKO, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. I'M PLEASED TO PRESENT YOU IN THIS WORK SESSION SUMMARY OF OUR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM THROUGH 2028/29. THIS MEETING, AS YOU MENTIONED, WAS SET UP TO PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE COUNCIL AND COMMISSION TO PROVIDE INFORMATION SO WE CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS THAT THE COUNCIL AND COMMISSION MAY HAVE. AT THE CONCLUSION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THAT THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN. THE 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT THAT MUNICIPALITIES USE FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES. FOR US, KIND OF SIMILAR TO OUR BUDGET, THAT OUTLINES A COUPLE PROJECTS, PROGRAMS OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS. EVEN THOUGH WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WE ADOPTED 2024/2025 YEAR BUDGET. BUT WE LOOK BEYOND THAT. A NUMBER OF OUT PROJECTS TAKES A NUMBER OF YEARS, FROM DESIGN, PLANNING, AND CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS NOT A ONE-YEAR PROJECT. SO WE USE THIS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO SPAN NUMBER OF YEARS TO NOT ONLY PLAN FOR THE PROJECT BUT FUNDING. A LOT OF THESE, AS YOU'VE HEARD PREVIOUSLY, ARE BIG-TICKET PROJECTS AND TAKES NUMBER OF YEARS TO FUND THEM. LOT OF BENEFITS THAT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HAS FOR ANY MUNICIPALITY, OAKLEY INCLUDED, IS FOR EVERYBODY IN THE COMMUNITY, NOT ONLY RESIDENTS BUT ALSO THE DEVELOPING COMPANY, TO KNOW WHAT IS THE CITY DOING DOWN THE ROAD. WHAT TYPE OF PROJECTS ARE BUILDING, WHAT TYPE OF PROJECTS ARE MAINTAINING? BECAUSE THAT REALLY PERPETUATES DEVELOPMENT. IT CREATES INTEREST FOR PEOPLE TO COME TO OAKLEY AND WANT TO OPEN BUSINESSES AND ESTABLISH BUSINESSES, EXPAND THEIR BUSINESS. SO THERE'S KIND OF A DIRECT RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ROBUSTNESS AND VOLUME OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT TO THE ECONOMIC VITALITY GROWTH IN THE COMMUNITY. ALSO ONE OF THE FOCUSES IN THE CIP IS HOW TO MAINTAIN OUR CORE INFRASTRUCTURE. AND AS YOU SEE IN THE PRESENTATION, WE COVER A WIDE SPECTRUM OF PROJECTS. COULD BE A FACILITY PROJECT. COULD BE A PARK PROJECT. COULD BE A STREET PROJECT AND EVERYTHING BETWEEN. SO WE DON'T JUST FOCUS ON ONE ELEMENT AND SAY, "WELL, WE'LL JUST DO STREETS IN THIS TOWN OR WE DO PARKS OR WE DO FACILITIES." BECAUSE OF OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS ACROSS THE BOARD, WE TRY TO SPREAD THE PROJECT ACROSS MULTIPLE AREAS OF INTEREST. ON THE UPCOMING 2024-2025 BUDGET, THIS IS INCLUDING THE PRESENTATION THAT YOU CAN SEE RIGHT HERE. THIS IS ONE OF THE PROJECTS THAT THEY ARE FUNDING WITH THESE ALLOCATIONS. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE STREET PROJECTS. ONE OF THEM IS A FACILITY PROJECT. MOST OF THEM HAVING BEEN COMPLETED. ONE OF THEM IS GOING TO BE PUTTING THE FINISHING TOUCHES. THIS IS PART OF THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THIS PROJECT WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE SEEN IT, WE HAVE THE FULL GLORY, AS PART OF THE SUMMERFEST FESTIVITIES NEXT MONTH. DOWNTOWN OAKLEY WILL HAVE VITALITY, GROWTH, AND WILL SET UP A GOOD FUTURE FOR DECADES TO COME. THAT'S ONE OF THE MAJOR UPDATED PROJECTS THAT WE DID. WE UPDATED THE FACILITIES AT THE CYPRESS GROVE PUMP STATION. THIS WAS CREATED NEARLY 20 YEARS AGO AS A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. SOMEHOW, THAT BUILDING WAS HALF ESSENTIALLY. ALL THE MECHANICAL COMPONENTS WERE UNDER THE WEATHER. OVER THE YEARS, IT TOOK A BEATING. THIS PROJECT ACTUALLY COVER THE BEATING --BUILDING, AND COVERED THE PUMP STATION. NO, IT IS GOOD FOR MANY YEARS TO COME. THE ENTIRE CYPRESS GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD IS SECURED AND SEALED FACILITIES. ONE OF THE MAJOR LARGE SURFACE PROJECTS, WE ARE SEARCHING THE WINTER FOLLOW-UP FROM LAST YEAR WHICH WAS A $4 MILLION PROJECT. THIS COMMUNITY DID ANOTHER ASSORTMENT OF STREET RESURFACING PROJECTS. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT IS VERY BENEFICIAL TO ANY CITY. FOR US TO KEEP THE QUALITY OF OUR STREETS AT THE TOP LEVEL. DIFFERENT CONDITIONING'S FOR THE PCI. MY PCI WAS THIS AND THAT. WE HAVE TO KEEP THE PCI ABOVE 70. THIS IS A GREAT INVESTMENT, THANKS TO THE COUNCIL FOR IMPROVING THAT PROJECT. THAT WAS COMPLETED THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT YOU HAVE TRAVELED, FROM MAIN STREET TO INSIDER REVENUES. WE INSTALLED SOLAR ROOF PANELS ON THE CITY HALL. THAT WOULD BE THE FINAL WRAP UP PHASE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE PGE BUILD GREATLY. THEY HAD A VERY NICE INSTRUCTOR AT THE DOG PARK. IT IS GOING TO BE COMPLETED. THEY HAD A PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING CROSSING SYSTEM, OVER THE TRAILER CROSSING FROM O'HARA SCHOOL. THIS WAS NEXT TO THE RECREATION CENTER. THIS WAS A FLASHING LIGHT AS THOSE WHO BIKE AND WALK ON THE TRAIL, WILL OFFICIALLY HAVE THE FLASHING LIGHTS AND MAKING THE ADVANCED NOTICES. THIS IS SOMEONE CROSSING THE ROADWAY. THIS INCLUDES THAT LEVEL OF SAFETY. WE UPGRADED THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS. WE HAD SOME RESURFACING OF THE PLAYGROUNDS. A LOT OF THIS NEEDED TO BE RESURFACED. ALL IN ALL, WE HAVE BEEN VERY ACTIVE THIS FISCAL YEAR, AND FINISHING A MULTITUDE OF PRODUCTS. MOVING ON TO THE 2024-2025 FISCAL YEAR, THE REAL FOCUS IS THE PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN A PRIORITY FOR QUITE SOME TIME. THIS IS PART OF THE MEETING. THIS INCLUDES CYPRESS GROVE. THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD, IS A COMPILATION OF THREE SEPARATE PROJECTS. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS EXHIBIT PACKET, THIS IS WHAT WE CALL THE CIP 2347. CIP 302. CIP 3010. EACH OF THEM WAS PART OF THE TIMELINE. WE KNOW THEY WERE INTERESTED. PROJECT 247, WEST TO EAST, BEGINS JUST AFTER THAT SECTION OF CYPRESS ROAD. GOING EAST, THIS IS THROUGH THE CROSSING. FOR THIS PROJECT WAS DESIGNED. WE ALREADY HAD THE CONTRACT OVER ONE YEAR AGO. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR A FEW THINGS TO FALL IN PLACE. WE HAVE BEEN USING SOME REGULATIONS. YOU CAN SEE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT STARTING IN ABOUT TWO WEEKS. MAJOR PROJECT, MAJOR ENHANCEMENT PROJECT. THIS IS THE FIRST LEG OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD. RELATED TO THAT, WE HAVE THE INTERSECTION OF NAISMITH AVENUE AND EAST CYPRESS. THIS IS A PROJECT THAT IS BEING BUILT BY THE DEVELOPER OF THE SUBDIVISION. IT IS ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A FEW YEARS AGO. WAITING FOR VARIOUS APPROVALS. THAT HAS BEEN DONE. BOTH OF THESE PROJECTS, WE WANT TO SEE CONSTRUCTION IN TWO WEEKS. THEY WILL BE GOING INTO AT THIS TIME NEXT YEAR. WE WOULD EXPECT BY THE SUMMER OF NEXT YEAR, THE PHASE ONE GLUE SECTION OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD, WOULD HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. AT THE CANAL, WHAT WE CALL PHASE TWO, WHICH IS WHAT WE CALL THE INTERSECTION OF EAST CYPRESS ISLAND ROAD, THE CANAL CROSSING, THIS PROJECT AS YOU RECALL, FROM LAST YEAR, THIS WAS GOING TO BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER OF THE GRAN CYPRESS PROJECT. THEY DECIDED NOT TO PURSUE THE PROJECT. THE CITY TOOK IT UPON OURSELVES TO TAKE THAT PROJECT. JUST BEFORE HOLIDAY OF LAST YEAR, DECEMBER 2023, THE CITY OFFICIALLY TOOK OVER THE PROJECT. PHASE THREE, TO BETHEL ISLAND. OVER THE PAST FEW MONTHS, MY COMPLIMENTS TO THE TEAM. THEY REALLY GOT AFTER THIS PROJECT. THEY REBUILD RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE WATER DISTRICT. THIS WAS A KEY PARTNER OF THAT INTERSECTION. WE ARE PUTTING THE PUZZLE TOGETHER. AS YOU HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST FEW MEETINGS, WE HAVE BROUGHT YOU A DESIGN CONTRACT FOR PHASE TWO. THIS INCLUDES EAST CYPRESS ROAD. THE DESIGN IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. WE ARE BRINGING YOU THE DESIGN CONTRACT FOR PHASE THREE. THIS INCLUDES A BETHEL ISLAND ROAD. THAT DESIGN NEEDS TO BE STARTED. A LOT OF PATHS ARE HAVE BEEN HAPPENING ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD. THIS IS WHAT IS CONSIDERED THE MOST COMPLEX PART OF THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD. THIS IS THE PHASE TWO PARK. THIS NOT ONLY INCLUDES THE BASIC UNDERGROUND IN THE CANAL, BUT IT IS THE BIG, OPEN CANAL THAT THEY HAVE THE DISTRICT PATHS WITH. THEY THEMSELVES, THEY CAME TO THE INTERSECTION OF CYPRESS ROAD. THEY FINISHED THAT CANAL. THIS IS ALL THE WAY OVER 1000 SOME ODD FEET. THE ONLY PIECE OF THE CANAL THAT IS LEFT, IS ABOUT 600 FEET, WHERE IT CROSSES UNDER EAST CYPRESS ROAD. THEY WILL BE DOING THAT. DOING THE DESIGN RIGHT NOW. BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEXITY OF IT, AND EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE TO DO, WORKING WITH THE WATER DISTRICT, THAT IS THE ACTIVE CANAL. YOU CAN'T JUST SAY YOU HAVE TO DO THAT TODAY. THE WINDOWS TAKE WHERE THEY DON'T NEED THE WATER ESSENTIALLY FROM A MIDSUMMER PROJECT. THIS DESIGN, IT IS GOING TO START NOW. IT WILL ESSENTIALLY BE THIS TIME NEXT YEAR, JUNE, JULY, AUGUST OF NEXT YEAR. FOLLOWING THE ACTIVE SUMMER 26, WE WILL BE FINISHING THAT. THAT CANAL CROSSING IS NOT JUST REPLACING THE CANAL. THAT IS GOING TO BE REPLACED WITH A 10 FOOT DIAMETER PIPE. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE. THIS IS A HEAVY PIPE. THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE ITSELF. EXTREMELY HEAVY PIPES. THEY COME IN EIGHT FOOT SECTIONS. IT IS NOT YOUR STANDARD DRAINAGE PIPE. IT IS A MAJOR UNDERTAKING. AGAIN, WE ARE WORKING WITH PARTNERS AT THE WATER DISTRICT. AS A PART OF THE WORK THAT OUR STAFF DID, MY COMPLIMENTS TO OUR TEAM. THEY DID AN AMAZING JOB, BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS WITH WATER DISTRICTS, WORKING TO SUSTAIN. THEY HAVE AGREED TO REIMBURSE US. THE COST FOR THE UNDER GROUNDING OF THAT PIPE IN THE CANAL, THAT IS OVER 2.2 MILLION. THEY CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT. THEY ACCEPT IT, AND THEY BUILD THE WATER DISTRICT. YOU'LL GET UP TO 2.2 MILLION BACK. WE WON'T HAVE FINITE DOLLARS. WE ARE TRYING TO SQUEEZE EVERY DOLLAR TO MAKE THIS BUDGET WORK. OVER THE SUMMER FROM NEXT YEAR TO 2026, PHASE TWO JERSEY ISLAND ROAD WOULD HE COMPLETED. THAT IS NOT ONLY JUST UNDERGOING THE CANAL, BUT IT IS A MULTITUDE OF UTILITY LINES. WATER, SEWER, GAS, ALL ACROSS THE CANAL. THEY HAVE TO REBUILD. THE ROADWAY GOES ON TOP OF IT. THEY ARE LOOKING AT THE INTERSECTION OF JERSEY ISLAND. A VERY COMPLEX PROJECT. AGAIN, WE HAVE COMMITTED --A COMMITTED AND PROFESSIONAL TEAM THAT WILL GET IT DONE. NOT FLASHING LIGHTS THAT ARE OUT THERE TODAY. JERSEY ISLAND ROAD. CONCURRENCE WITH THAT, WE ARE GOING TO PICK UP THE DESIGN ON SECTION 3, AND PHASE THREE OF THIS PROJECT. THIS IS BASICALLY JUST WEST OF JERSEY ISLAND ROAD, ALL THE WAY TO BETHEL ISLAND. THIS IS PART OF THAT EXHIBIT. THAT PROJECT, YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE FUNDING. WE CAN START THAT SOONER THAN LATER. WE ARE STOPPING THAT IN 2026. THERE ARE SOME POSSIBILITIES. WE WILL INSTALL THAT IN 2025. THEY ARE ASKING IF WE ARE ON SCHEDULE. WHEN IS THIS GOING TO BE BUILT? THESE ARE COMPLEX PROJECTS. EVEN IF EVERYTHING WAS IN ORDER, AS THEY HAVE THE PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THIS CONSTRUCTION ASPECT, WE CAN JUST GO THERE AND TURN THE WATER UPSIDE DOWN. MAJOR TRAFFIC SNAFUS WOULD OCCUR. WE HAVE TO KEEP THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD WHERE WE BUILD THE PROJECT. LITERALLY, ONE WEEK OR SO FROM NOW, YOU WILL SEE CONSTRUCTION ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD, INTO 27, I WOULD SAY. ALL THREE PHASES WOULD HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. YOU ASK FOR PATIENCE AND UNDERSTANDING. WE ARE PUTTING BIG SIGNS INFORMATION, TO EVERYBODY. RESIDENTS, GUESTS, WHOEVER DRIVES THAT. IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMING. AGAIN, OUR TEAM HAS REALLY STEPPED UP TO THE PLATE. THIS IS BEING A PRIORITY. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT IS EXECUTED. PEOPLE REALLY SEE CONSTRUCTION OUT THERE. THAT SHOULD BE A GOOD THING. WE ALWAYS HAVE OUR INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ANY FORMATION, THEY CAN REACH OUT TO US. IF YOU HEAR FROM YOUR CONSTITUENTS ABOUT THE SCHEDULE OF THE PROJECT, IT IS GOING TO RUN PARALLEL ON MULTIPLE PATHS TO GET THIS THING DONE. THIS IS FROM LAST THREE DAYS. THE OTHER FUTURE PROJECT, IS PART OF THE NEW FISCAL YEAR. 2024-2025. AS YOU KNOW, OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS, THEY HAVE IMPROVED A LOT. THE ONLY BOTTLENECK SECTION, WAS CLOVER BROOK. ESSENTIALLY ALONG THE VINEYARD, THE CITY DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT AWAY. TWO LANES BECOME ONE MAIN -- LANE. WE ALL KNOW AND WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT IT. WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE FAMILY THAT OWNS THE VINEYARD. LAST YEAR, WE FINALLY REACHED AGREEMENTS UNDER THE DEDICATION OF THE RIGHT AWAY. THIS DESIGN WAS HAPPENING. THIS INCLUDES THE EL TORO ROAD AND O'HARA. YOU WILL HAVE THE NEW LAW TO LOOK BACK WITH. SIDEWALKS, ALL THE CITY MOVEMENTS. SAME THING ON O'HARA. THAT PROJECT IS IN THE FINAL PHASES OF DESIGN. JULY 9th, UNTIL THE BEGINNING OF THE FISCAL YEAR, WE WILL HAVE THE DESIGN CONTRACT, AWARD THE CONTRACT, AND WE WILL START CONSTRUCTION ON THIS PROJECT AUGUST. THIS WOULD GO INTO THE SUMMER OF NEXT YEAR. WHILE WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS PROJECT AS YOU HEARD, WE ARE DEVELOPING A SHOPPING CENTER. WE HAVE BEEN COLLABORATING WITH THEM. A LOT OF THEM HAVE BEEN OUR PROJECT. LOOKING AT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL, WE NEED RECONFIGURATION. THE SECTION OF TOWN IS GOING TO GET A LOT OF BUSINESS. IT IS POSITIVE ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT. YOU CAN SEE CONSTRUCTION ON THE LOWER ROAD AND BEYOND. BY THE SUMMER OR FALL OF NEXT YEAR, BASED ON WHAT WE UNDERSTAND FROM THE DEVELOPER, THEIR CENTER IS GOING TO BE FINISHED. HOPEFULLY BY NOVEMBER 2025. WE WILL HAVE IT COMPLETED AND DONE. THIS WILL BE A MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TO THAT INTERSECTION, AND THAT SECTION OF THE TOWN. THESE ARE GOING TO BE FEATURING MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. 24-25, AND ONLY THE NEXT THREE FISCAL YEARS. THAT TAKES A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESOURCES ACROSS THE BOARD. FUNDING, STAFFING, THAT IS ONE OF OUR FOCUSES. ON THE FACILITY FRONT, THE LIBRARY PROJECT, AS MANY OF YOU KNOW, WE STARTED SOME CONCEPTUAL PLANNING. FUNDRAISING IS GOING TO BE AROUND FOR THIS PROJECT FOR VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS, FANS OF THE LIBRARY, AND OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS WILL BE LOOKING FOR FUNDING ON MANY LEVELS PAID A MAJOR, MAJOR PROJECT FOR OAKLEY. WE ARE ALL IN, TRYING TO MAKE THIS PROJECT A REALITY. WE ARE STILL LOOKING AT OTHER ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT. THIS IS ONE OF THE CIP'S. WE ARE LETTING PEOPLE KNOW, IN TERMS OF THE FUNDRAISING. WE WILL WORK THIS PROJECT OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS. HOPEFULLY, THE FUNDING PARTS COME THROUGH. THIS WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED. THE COMMUNITY CENTER WILL THIS IS WHAT WE CALL THE CITY HALL CORP. RATION YARD. ACROSS FROM THE PARK, IT WILL BE A BEAUTIFUL PROJECT. THIS WILL BE A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY. THIS IS GOING TO BE INTO OUR CAMPUS. THIS WAS ONE OF THE NICEST CIVIC CENTERS THAT YOU ARE GOING TO SEE. THAT IS REALLY GOING TO TAKE IT TO A NEW AND DIFFERENT LEVEL. THIS IS PART OF THE ARTISTIC RENDERING OFF OF THIS PROJECT. ONE OF OUR OTHER CONSIDERED MAJOR PROJECTS, ARE LOOKING AT OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE DONE ON THIS SIDE OF THE CORRIDOR. FROM THE DIFFERENT PROJECTS, WE WANTED TO HAVE ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE FOR EVERYBODY FROM FAR EAST OAKLEY, AND MOST AREAS. THEY ALL HAVE TO COME THROUGH EAST CYPRESS ROAD. WE ARE TRYING TO EXTEND LAUREL ROAD. RIGHT NOW, THIS WOULD BE A DEAD-END AT TETON AVENUE. THIS INCLUDES THE PARKLAND NEIGHBORHOOD DID THIS WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE BRIDGE. OVER TO THE REGULAR TRACK. LANDING ON THE OTHER SIDE. THIS IS GOING TO BE INCLUDED AT THE FORMER INTERSECTION. THIS PROJECT IS GOING TO COST US ABOUT $40 MILLION. NOT CHEAP. WE STARTED ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO DOING JUST CONCEPTUAL DESIGN. WORKING ON PRIMARY ACQUISITION, UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ARE ABOUT FOUR PROPERTIES. THE PLAN IS DURING THIS YEAR, AND IN THE COMING MONTHS, WORK ON ACQUIRING THE RIGHT AWAY FOR THIS PROJECT, WHILE CONCURRENTLY, LOOKING AT GRANT FUNDING, ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTING IT. CONSTRUCTING IT BRINGS A LOT OF RELIEF FROM EAST CYPRESS ROAD AS IT COMES TO MINISTRY. THIS IS ESPECIALLY THE COMMUTERS. THEY GET AROUND LAUREL ROAD. IT IS EASY, DIRECT, AND IT HAS AN ODD NATURE. IT REALLY ENHANCES THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. WE ARE LOOKING AT TRAFFIC LOADS ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD. JUST THE NATURE WITH THE GROWTH THAT WE HAVE, WE ALWAYS WANT TO ANTICIPATE, AND STAY IN FRONT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THAT IS OUT THERE. MAKING SURE THAT THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK CAN ACCOMMODATE THE GROWTH THAT WE ARE HAVING. ONE OF OUR MAJOR PROJECTS THAT WE ARE WORKING ON. THIS IS JUST IN SUMMARY AGAIN. I WANTED TO TOUCH ON FUTURE PROJECTS. THIS IS NOT IMPORTANT. EVEN A SMALL AND BETTER PROJECT, MAY NOT BE A MULTIMILLION DOLLAR PROJECT. YOU STILL HAVE TO GO FOR SOME ROUTINE. CONCLUSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION, IS THAT THE PLANNING RESOLUTION, WILL BE FINDING THAT THE 2425 CAPITAL GROUP PROGRAM, WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN. HENRY QUESTIONS? >> THANK YOU. I THINK WE WILL TAKE PUBLIC COMMENT. WE WILL GO TO THE COUNCIL FOR COMMENTS. MIKE CASTRO? JUST KIDDING. DONNA BIKER? >> YIKES. THANK YOU. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. KEVIN, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR WORK ON THOSE PROJECTS. THEY ARE ALL MUCH-NEEDED. MY DAUGHTER LIVES IN THE SUMMER LAKE AREA. TWICE, THEY WERE EVACUATED DUE TO FIRES. ONE TIME, SHE WAS THERE OVER TWO HOURS. DRIVING ON LAUREL ROAD. ONE TIME, SHE DIDN'T MAKE IT. ONE YEAR AGO, I STOOD BEFORE ALL OF YOU TO ASK FOR THE SENIOR CENTER, TRYING TO GET US BACK OPEN. WE ARE LOOKING AT CONTINUED SERVICES, AS WE TRY TO HELP NOT ONLY THE SENIORS, BUT EVERYONE WHO COMES TO OUR DOORS FOR FOOD AND ASSISTANCE. THAT INCLUDES OTHER NONPROFITS THAT WE ALLOW USE OF THE BUILDING. THIS INCLUDES THE VETERANS 4H, MEALS ON WHEELS, AND COCOA CAFE. OVER THE YEARS, YEARS AGO, WE WERE INFORMED THAT BUILDING THE OLD FIREHOUSE, WOULD HAVE IT TO BE DEMOLISHED. WE WERE EXCITED WHEN WE FOUND OUT THAT THE NEW BUILDING WOULD BE SHARED WITH THE LIBRARY. IT WAS HIS APPOINTMENT TO SEE THE ARCHITECT PLANS WITH NO SPACE DEDICATED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE SENIOR CENTER. WE WERE TOLD THAT THE COMMON AREAS, 980 SQUARE FEET, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL 1420 SQUARE FEET OF TWO FLEXPHONE, WOULD HAVE ALLOCATED SPACE. ONE OF THEM AVAILABLE TO US. THE SENIOR CENTER NEEDS TO EXPAND, NOT TO CONTRACT. NEEDING TO BE LARGER THAN THE CURRENT 4000 PLUS SQUARE FOOT FUTURE. IN ADDITION, WE WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND. AS SUCH, WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE AREAS SUCH AS OTHER SENIOR CENTERS, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN, AN AREA FOR COCOA CAFE TO HAVE LUNCHES FIVE DAYS A WEEK. THIS IS A COMMON AREA FOR ACTIVITIES. A PLACE FOR TRIDENTINE TRANSIT. SENIOR PARKING, OFFICE, STOREROOM AREA, OFFICES FOR BOTH THE OAKLEY VETERANS AND MEALS ON WHEELS READ WE WOULD LIKE TO PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY, AS ONE OF THE FEW SENIOR CLUBS REMAINING IN CALIFORNIA. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, WE ARE THE ONLY GROUP --SORRY. WE ARE THE ONLY GROUP PROVIDING SERVICES, CLASSES, AND IN RICHMOND, SPECIFICALLY FOR SENIORS AND OAKLEY. SPECIFICALLY AS SUCH, WHY ARE WE NOT ON THE CITY'S FUTURE PLANS OR ARCHITECT DESIGN THAT IS ON DISPLAY IN THE HALLWAY? I BELIEVE WE NEED THE LIBRARY. I WILL CONTINUE TO HOW TO WORK WITH THE FUNDING. I TRULY WOULD LIKE TO SEE OAKLEY SENIOR CENTER AS PART OF THE PLANS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? NO? OKAY. IN THE BACK, ALAN. IS THE PRESIDENT. ON FIRST VP. WE ALSO HAVE A BOARD MEMBER, IN THE BACK. THANK YOU. >> UP NEXT, MIKE CASTRO. >> MY NAME IS MIKE CASTRO. ABOUT THE LIBRARY/COMMUNITY CENTER. LIKE DONNA SAID, THERE IS NO MENTION FOR US. IT IS LIKE WE ARE BEING PUSHED TO THE CURB. THEY SAY WE WILL HAVE THE PARK ACROSS THE STREET AT THE TRAIN STATION. IF YOU KNOW SENIORS, THAT IS AN ACCIDENT EVENTUALLY GOING TO HAPPEN. IT WOULD BE A MAJOR LAWSUIT. IT IS AN ACCIDENT. PEOPLE WITH CANES AND WALKERS. THIS AND THAT. WE NEED SOMEPLACE WHERE THERE IS ENOUGH PARKING, AND ENOUGH SPACE, SO THAT WE CAN HAVE OUR FUNCTIONS, AND NOT BOTHER THE LIBRARY OR COMMUNITY CENTER. WHAT IS THE REC CENTER? ISN'T THAT A COMMUNITY CENTER? IT IS LUDICROUS, I THINK. THAT IS ALL I HAVE. >> THANK YOU. SEEING NO OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT, I WILL GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO QUESTION AND COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL AND COMMISSION. IN THIS UNIQUE SETTING, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND TRY TO GET MY ATTENTION IF YOU HAVE GOT SOMETHING. >> I'M SORRY. I LOST WHAT YOU SAID. >> WITH UNIQUE SETTING THAT WE HAVE HERE, YOU CAN GET MY ATTENTION IF YOU WANT TO ASK A QUESTION OR MAKE A COMMENT. >> DO YOU WANT US TO MAKE A COMMENT? >> WE HAVE THE BUTTONS APPEAR. THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOESN'T HAVE ACCESS. >> THEY DO HAVE ACCESS. >> MY COMMENT, FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND THOSE OF YOU HERE, WE CAN GO ON. >> DO WE HAVE ANYONE ELSE WITH QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER? >> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE THIS EVENING. CAN WE GO TO THE SLIDE WITH CIP 340-7302 01 310. I WANT TO APPRECIATE THE COMMENT MADE AROUND HAZARD MITIGATION. THIS IS FOR THE CITY TO EXPEND THIS ENTRYWAY. I HAVE A TECHNICAL DESIGN QUESTION. I UNDERSTAND WE ARE GETTING PREPARED FOR LAUNCHING FULL FORCE INTO THIS. THINKING ABOUT YOUR COMMENT ABOUT CAMPUS, I KNOW THIS MEETS THE COMPLETE STREETS REQUIREMENTS. THINKING ABOUT BICYCLE SAFETY, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, IS IT POSSIBLE WHEN WE ARE LOOKING AT THE EXHIBIT OF THE DIAGRAM, WOULD WE BE ALLOWED TO SWITCH ON THE RIGHT OF THE DIAGRAM, THE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK, THEN THE TREE, THEN THE BICYCLISTS. CAN WE DO TREE SIDEWALK BICYCLIST TREE TO PROTECT BICYCLISTS? I'M THINKING ABOUT THE 55 ACRE PARK THAT IS PLANNING TO BE BUILT. I'M THINKING ABOUT THE FUTURE OF OAKLEY BEING THIS WALKABLE, LIKABLE PLACE. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN CONSIDER? >> COMMISSIONER, AS FAR AS SOMETHING TO CONSIDER, IF YOU LOOK, IT IS MORE INVOLVED IN JUST SWITCHING THE STREET AND THE BIKE IN THE SIDEWALK READ ONE THING THAT I WANT TO EMPHASIZE TO EVERYBODY, THE LAST SECTION OF EAST LAUREL ROAD, IMPROVING FROM EMPIRE TO O'HARA, SINCE WE REBUILD IT, THE BIKE LANES ARE CREATING A BUFFER ZONE BETWEEN THE TRAVEL BAY. THERE IS A TWO FOOT BUFFER ZONE, THEN THE BIKE LANE. PRIOR STANDARD, WAS THAT WE HAD THE BIKE LANE RIGHT NEXT TO THE TRAVEL LANE. ON SOME ROADS LIKE THAT, THIS IS HIGH-SPEED, MAJOR ARTERIAL. IT MAY BE LESS THAN UNCOMFORTABLE. WE WILL BE DOING THAT ENTIRE THING ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD, IN TERMS OF BASED ON THE DETAILS THAT YOU SEE. AGAIN, IT IS A LOT MORE INVOLVED THAN SIMPLY SUSTAINING IT. BECAUSE OF THE TOP OF INFRASTRUCTURE, IT HAS BEEN DESIGNED. THIS PROJECT, PHASE ONE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. PHASE TWO AND PHASE THREE, ARE INTO THE CONSTRUCTION. I'M SORRY, INTO THE DESIGN PHASE. THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO STUDY THOSE, TO LOOK AT IT FROM A PRACTICALITY. I AM NOT GOING TO SAY THAT IT IS NOT DOABLE. OBVIOUSLY, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF CHALLENGES. ANYTHING THAT YOU ALLUDED TO, MEETS THE COMPLETE STREETS. THIS IS THE STATEWIDE PROGRAM, AND ALL THE CITIES WHEN YOU MAKE A STREET. YOU SHOULD MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES, AND ALL THE CURRENT CONVENIENCES FOR ALL MODES OF TRANSPORTATION. THAT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I CAN LOOK INTO, AND LET YOU KNOW LATER. RIGHT NOW, THIS IS THE DESIGN WE ARE PURSUING. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION, AND FOR BRINGING TO OUR ATTENTION, SOME OF THE MAJOR PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE ON OUR ROAD MAP FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS FOR SURE. THE QUESTION THAT I HAVE FOR YOU, LAUREL EXTENSION PROJECT, IT IS A VERY COSTLY PROJECT. I'M SORRY IF I MISSED IT. WHAT IS THE TIMELINE ON THAT? >> THE TIMELINE ON THIS PROJECT, AND KNOW THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVING THAT CONNECTION. THAT PROJECT AS WE SPEAK, OUR GOAL THIS YEAR, IS TRYING TO LOOK AT THE RIGHT ACQUISITION. AS A DIFFERENT PROCESS IN ITSELF. LET'S GO THROUGH THAT. THEN, WE ACHIEVE THAT. ALL OF THIS IS WITH FUNDING. NONE OF THESE PRODUCTS ARE SOMETHING THAT $100,000 WILL DO. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT MILLIONS. THIS IS A $40 MILLION PROJECT. WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR GRANT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES. THIS IS REALLY GOING TO TRIGGER THE CONSTRUCTION, AND THE SCHEDULE. ONCE WE HAVE FINISHED THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, WE ARE MOVING ON WITH THE FINAL DESIGN, AND THE PROJECT DESIGN. THAT WILL TAKE A GOOD YEAR. WE HAVE TO GET PERMITS THROUGH THE COUNTY, AND THROUGH THE RAILROAD. GIVE IT A QUICK YEAR. JUST ON A GOOD NOTE. LET'S SAY IF YOU HAVE 40 MILLION ON THE BACK, WHICH WE DON'T. YOU ARE LOOKING PROBABLY IN ABOUT THREE YEARS, STOPPING CONSTRUCTION. WE HAVE TO SECURE THE FUNDING. THIS IS ONE OF THE IMPORTANT PROJECTS THAT WE ARE TRYING TO GET. >> YOU OBVIOUSLY SHARED SOME OF THE BIGGER PROJECTS WITH US. ANY PARTICULAR SMALLER PROJECTS THAT YOU CARE TO SHARE? >> SMALLER PROJECT, IT IS IN YOUR PACKET. REALLY, BECAUSE OF THE FOCUS THAT WE NEEDED TO HAVE FOR 24-25, AT LEAST THE NEXT TWO YEARS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT. CYPRESS AND LAUREL ROAD. SMALLER PROJECT THAT WE ARE HAVING RIGHT HERE, IS PART OF THE SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT. THIS IS A $150,000 PROJECT. THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY, WE HAVE A LOT THAT IS GOING TO BE UPLIFTED BY THE TREES. LOOKING AT THE U.S. RESIDENT, IN MANY CITIES, THEY ARE WASHING THEIR HANDS AWAY FROM IT. THIS IS HOW THEY ARE FIXING IT. SOMETHING HAPPENS. TO ME, THIS WAS NOT ANOTHER APPROACH. SEVERAL YEARS AGO, WE WORKED WITH THE COUNCIL, LOOKING AT THE 50-50 PARTIAL PROGRAM. WE BUNDLED MANY OF THESE SITES. WE WERE BUILDING IT COLLECTIVELY SO THAT WE GET SCALE. ONCE WE COMPLETE THE PROJECT, WE ARE BUILDING THIS AT HALF OF THE COST. THIS IS VERY GOOD FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER, EVEN THOUGH WE ARE CALLING IT 50-50 IN REALITY. IT IS CLOSE TO 7030. WE DO ALL THE LEGWORK AT THE END OF THE PROJECT. THAT'S ONE OF THE PROJECTS THAT WE ARE DOING. MONEY IS SET ASIDE FOR. THIS IS NOT ONE OF THE OTHER ISSUES THAT WE FACE IN THE COMMUNITY. WE CAN GET APPLICATIONS IN FOR VARIOUS TRAFFIC ACTIONS. THESE ARE THE SMALLER PROJECTS. THE PROJECT THAT I AM MENTIONING THAT YOU HAVE SEEN, THESE ARE PROJECTS THAT SPAN MULTIPLE YEARS. NONE OF THESE ARE THE ONES THAT YOU FINISH IN ONE FISCAL YEAR. JUST BECAUSE OF THE MASS AND SCALE OF THE PROJECT, THE DESIGNING OF IT, THE CYPRESS ROAD PROJECTS, WE ARE LOOKING AT A GOOD, THREE-YEAR POSSIBILITY THROUGH THAT. WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THE LAUREL ROAD PROJECT ALMOST FIVE YEARS. WORKING THROUGH THE PROCESS TO GET TO THE STAGE, AND NEXT JULY. WE HAVE ANOTHER CONTRACT BROUGHT ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL. SMALLER PROJECT, WE CAN WRAP THEM UP IN ABOUT SIX MONTHS OR SO. GOOD PROJECT, IT WILL BE DONE IN MANY FISCAL YEARS. >> THANK YOU FOR THAT. THANK YOU FOR MAKING IT A PHYSICAL PRIORITY TO KEEP OUR COMMUNITY SAFE, AND THINKING ABOUT PROPERTY OWNERS TOO. >> WHEN WE LOOK AT THE CAPITAL PROGRAM, I DON'T LOOK AT IT SOLELY BECAUSE IT IS JUST STREETS OR PARTS. IT IS NOT JUST FACILITIES. WE ARE TRYING TO ADVOCATE THE RESOURCES WE HAVE IN THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE. STRATEGIC GOALS THAT THE COUNCIL IS SET ACROSS THE BOARD. OUR NEEDS ARE HUGE. WE CAN SPEND IT TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF PROJECTS. WE CAN ALLOCATE RESOURCES ACROSS THE BOARD. THESE ARE ALL ELEMENTS OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I WILL HAND THIS OVER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS IS THEIR VOTE. >> I WOULD LOVE TO ASK ONE MORE QUESTION. THANK YOU SO MUCH. CONSIDERING THIS IS A PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE, CONSIDERING THE FUTURE OF OAKLEY, I KNOW YOU AND I TALKED ABOUT THIS. I'M BUMMED TO SEE NO ART PROJECTS ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. I HOPE YOU CAN SHARE WITH US YOUR FAVORITE ART PROJECT IN OAKLEY, AND YOUR VISION FOR PUBLIC ART. ARE THERE ANY BARRIERS THAT ARE GOING TO BE HERE? >> MY PERSONAL FAVORITE IN DOWNTOWN, IS THE MEDIAN OF MAIN STREET AND SECOND STREET. THERE IS A BEAUTIFUL BIRD CULTURE THAT WAS THERE ABOUT SIX YEARS AGO WHEN WE WERE BUILT DOWNTOWN. THIS IS REALLY BEAUTIFUL ARTWORK. A LOT OF PEOPLE AND TRAVEL IS AN OUT-OF-TOWN, THEY SAY THAT THEY WILL BUILD THIS. HE WAS THE ARTIST. AS PART OF THE NEW DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, RIGHT ON THE INTERSECTION OF MAIN STREET AND O'HARA. RIGHT NEXT TO THE BISTRO, THEY BUILT A BEAUTIFUL MONUMENT AND PLAZA. THERE IS ACTUALLY A MONUMENT THAT IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED OVER THERE. IT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. NEXT MONTH. A LARGE PIECE OF GRANITE TRUCK AND STONE IS PART OF THAT. TO ME, IT IS VERY NICE. IT IS A NICE PIECE OF ARTWORK. ALL OF THESE PROJECTS, THEY NEED FUNDING. HOW DO WE FUND IT? COMING FROM THE PROGRAM, TO INCORPORATE VARIOUS ARTWORK INTO THE SAME PROJECT. WE ARE GOING TO BE ON CAPITAL PROJECTS. THIS IS GOING TO BE SAME AS THE DEVELOPERS DO. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE MORE FROM A POLICY LEVEL. WE HAVE TO SEE WHAT THE PREFERENCE IS. I THINK THAT HAS TO BE PART OF A PROGRAM IN ITSELF. I LACK ARTWORK. WE ARE LOOKING AT THIS CULTURE, AND PUTTING IT HERE. WE ARE DISCOVERING THE INTERNAL PROCESS. THIS IS FROM THE VARIOUS OFFICIALS AND BOARDS. WE ARE COMING OFF OF THAT PROGRAM. TO ME, THAT IS GOING TO BE A PUBLIC AND PARTNER -- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. WE ARE EXPERIENCING THIS IN OTHER CITIES. THIS IS PART OF THEIR COMMUNITY, RESPECTING THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT. THEY ARE PROVIDING VARIOUS'S. THAT HAS TO HAVE ITS OWN PROCESS. WE ARE GOING TO DEVELOP THIS BY STAFF. THIS IS PART OF THIS INTERSECTION. WHAT WE HAVE DONE, IT IS ALL DOWNTOWN. TRYING TO LOOK AT A FUTURE ART COMPONENT. >> I KNOW THE LIBRARY WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. WE ARE GETTING A LOCAL ARTIST TO HELP WITH THAT. I FEEL LIKE WE ARE HELPING WHEN WE CAN. IT IS A VALID QUESTION. COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? >> JUST FOR A POINT OF ORDER, THE AGENDA SAYS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ASK QUESTIONS, AND HAVE A DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE COUNCIL WILL HAVE QUESTIONS AND A DISCUSSION. AT WHICH TIME, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL VOTE. ARE WE INTERMINGLING IT? WHERE ARE WE IN THE STAGES? ARE WE NOW INTO CANCEL QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION? >> THIS IS JUST A WORK SESSION. WE ARE OPENING IT UP TO THE COMMISSION OR THE COUNCIL TO ASK QUESTIONS OR MAKE COMMENTS. >> THE AGENDA DIDN'T QUITE SAY THAT. THEY SEGMENTED IT. MAYBE IT IS THE PARLIAMENTARIAN. IF THAT IS THE WAY WE WANT TO DO IT, WE ARE TRYING TO KICK IT AROUND. I WAS HOPING WITH 27 MILLION, WE MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT MORE FORMAL. MAYBE OUR PARTNER CAN HELP US ON THAT. >> I AM NOT SURE. >> THERE IS NO NEED TO HAVE IT. IT IS FORMALLY SEGMENTED, AS YOU HAD SAID GRADE IT CAN BE DONE IN MORE OF A CASUAL SETTING, AS THE MAYOR HAD SAID. LEAVING THE FLOOR OPEN TO THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL TO ASK QUESTIONS ON THE WORK SESSION ITEM, AFTER THEY HAD DONE THE PRESENTATION. >> OKAY. I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ON PROJECT 273. I WAS GRATEFUL THAT YOU PUT THAT ON THERE. WHO IS GOING TO BENEFIT EAST CYPRESS IN THAT CORRIDOR? IT IS INTENDED TO CHANNEL TRAFFIC OFF OF EAST CYPRESS. THIS IS ALSO THE ROOT THAT I HAVE SUPPORTED. I HOPE IT IS GOING TO COME TO FRUITION. THE QUESTION THAT COMES, WHEN YOU BUILD THAT, WHEN IT IS CONSTRUCTED, IT IS GOING TO SPLIT THE COMMUNITY THAT IS THERE RIGHT NOW. THEY USE THEM. THERE IS A COMMUNITY EXISTING BACK ON. THE NUMBER ONE EXTENSION, IT WILL SPLIT THAT COMMUNITY. IT IS ALSO GOING TO ADD NOISE AND POLLUTION. THEY WILL HAVE THOSE ASPECTS TO THOSE COMMUNITIES IN THE BORDER UNIT. AT LEAST THE WAY THAT I SEE IT. >> THAT PROJECT, FROM THE AVENUE AS YOU DRIVE ON THIS NEW ROAD TOWARDS TETON AND LAUREL AT THE RAILROAD TRACK, THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE RIGHT NOW THAT IS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE BUILDING A NEW SUBDIVISION. THEY HAVE ALREADY DEDICATED A ROADWAY FOR THIS DRIVEWAY. THERE ARE CHANGES. IT IS JUST THE NATURE OF LIFE. IT HAS BEEN A SLEEPY AND GROUCHY COMMUNITY. WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THAT KEEPS GOING, IT IS SLOWLY CHANGING. THIS IS GOING TO GO THROUGH FULL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS. ANYTHING THAT IS GOING TO BE NECESSARILY MITIGATED, AS THIS PROJECT EVOLVES, YOU CERTAINLY ALLUDE TO THIS ALL THE WAY DOWN. THIS IS ON TO THE JOB SITES. >> I WAS HALFWAY THROUGH THE DISCUSSION PHASE. THIS PARK IS ON THERE. $5 MILLION, AS I UNDERSTAND IT QUITE >> THAT IS CORRECT. >> WE WILL TALK ABOUT THAT LATER. >> MY FAVORITE. PROJECT 314. A.D.A. IT HAS BEEN 34 YEARS. WE ARE STILL PUTTING 50,000 TO RECTIFY $100 MILLION WORTH OF DEFICIENCIES. I AM NOT WHOLE IN SOME PEOPLE'S IDEALS. I USE A CANE AND A SERVICE DOG. IT IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING. IT IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE. --FAVORITES. >> THE CITY WAS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. THEY HAD $100 MILLION WORTH OF IMPROVEMENT. IN THE PAST FEW YEARS, EVERY YEAR, THEY HAVE FISCAL YEAR 24-25 READ THIS IS THE $50,000 DIFFERENCE. DEFINITELY DROPPING THE BUCKET. ENRICHING THE $100 MILLION PROJECT. WHAT WE HAVE DONE FOR THE BENEFIT OF EVERYBODY, WE HAVE TRIED TO SPEND AND SPREAD THAT FUNDING ACROSS THE BOARD. WE ARE TRYING TO IMPROVE THE FACILITIES. A LOT OF TIMES, MOST OF THEM, WE ARE TRYING TO ADD THE A.D.A. WHEELCHAIR RAMPS WITH ALL OF THE STREET CROSSINGS. STANDARD CHANGE OCCURS EVERY YEAR. THEY HAVE VERY FINITE DETAILS, ESPECIALLY IN THE PART OF TOWN THAT WAS BUILT 20 YEARS AGO. THIS WAS NO LONGER ALONG THE VALLEY. WE HAVE TO UPGRADE THOSE RAMPS TO CERTAIN STANDARDS. IT IS NOT GOING TO GET US CLOSER TO 100 MILLION. WE ARE LOOKING AT ALL OF THE PRIORITIES. THESE PRODUCTS, ALL OF THEM IS RIGHT THERE. >> I WAS PONDERING HOW THIS MIGHT RESOLVE. I WAS WONDERING IF WE CAN RESOLVE THIS WITH THE CIP. WE WILL COMMIT $5 MILLION IN IMPROVEMENTS. ANY CIP THAT IS IMPROVED, THIS WILL HAVE TO BE TAKEN IN TOTAL TO THAT. IF WE HAVE THE CIP'S THAT ARE NOT HELPING US MEET THE 5 MILLION, WE ARE GOING TO PUT THOSE ASIDE UNTIL WE HONOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS AND THE DISABLED. THIS IS INCLUDING THE DISABILITY AND ADA ADHERENTS. IT SHOULD BE PROPERLY FUNDED. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF PROJECTS, THIS AND THAT. WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE, WE WILL PUT IT IN THERE. I AM GRATEFUL AT THIS TIME. SAYING PLEASE BE PATIENT. IT IS PROBABLY NOT THE SAME THING. I AM WONDERING IF WE CAN IN SOME MANNER, WONDERING IF WE CAN COMMIT WITH THE CIP. WE ARE COMMITTED TO SPENDING FIVE OR $10 MILLION IN TERMS OF ADA INVESTMENTS. WE ARE NOT APPROVING ANY CIP ISLANDS --UNLESS THEY PROVE THAT. >> I THINK WE NEED TO FOCUS ON, WITH THE CIP IN GENERAL, IS THAT WE ARE ALLOCATING $50,000 EACH YEAR. EVERY SINGLE PROJECT, WHETHER IT IS A RUNWAY PROJECT, FACILITY PROJECT, OR PARKS PROJECT, HAS ADA COMPLIANCE, AND MONEY BEING SPENT. IT IS EVERY SINGLE PROJECT. >> I AM GLAD THAT YOU BROUGHT THAT UP. I AM GLAD THAT WE CAN ASCERTAIN HOW MUCH OF THAT PROJECT WILL GO TO ADA. THIS IS GOING TO BE $1 MILLION TOWARDS ADA. ON HIS INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS I'M TRYING TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHICHEVER PART IT IS. WE CANNOT TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION THAT THAT IS OUR PAYMENT TOWARDS THIS 100 MILLION. >> I UNDERSTAND. IT IS REALLY A DECISION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND HOW TO ALLOCATE THE FUNDS. WHAT WE ARE DOING, WE ARE HOLDING THE WORK SESSION TO SHOW THAT THIS IS THE PROPOSAL THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THE BUDGET. WE ARE TAKING IT IN ON JUNE 11th TO TAKE IN THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION. IF THERE NEEDS TO BE ADOPTION ON CERTAIN PROJECTS, AND HOW TO PRIORITIZE THOSE, THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN SO THAT WE CAN MAKE THOSE CHANGES. >> I WILL BE ASSESSING THAT LATER. I DID NOT SEE CREEKSIDE PARK, OR BETHEL ISLAND EXPANSION. ARE WE GOING TO HAVE ANYTHING ALONG THAT LINE? >> WE HAVEN'T BEEN GIVEN DIRECTION TO LOOK AT ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT PARK. UNTIL WE HAVE THAT DIRECTION AND CONSENSUS, AT LEAST THREE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS VOTING TO GIVE US THAT DIRECTION, WE HAVEN'T INCLUDED ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO CREEKSIDE PARK IN THE CIP THIS YEAR. BETHEL ISLAND ROAD IS DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED. THEY WERE CONSTRUCTING THE SUMMER IN THE NORTH RIGHT NOW. CONSTRUCTING BETHEL ISLAND ROAD FROM THE INTERSECTION, ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT. WE ARE WORKING IN CONCERT WITH TI CAPITAL FOR THE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT. >> WHAT ABOUT THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE FILING? WHAT ABOUT DELTA ROAD? MY UNDERSTANDING, WE ARE BUYING THE PROPERTIES OF WHAT WE EXPENDED. >> IS THIS PART OF A PLAN REQUIREMENT? IS THIS A MITIGATION FROM DEVELOPERS THAT ARE BUILDING THAT PLAN AREA THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZED A FEW MONTHS BACK. LOOKING AT THE EIR WORK THAT WILL BE DONE TO LOOK AT THAT ROADWAY. THIS EXTENSION AND CONNECTION TO DELTA, TRYING TO SEE IF THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE PATH. THIS IS PART OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION. THIS IS PART OF THE PROJECT. THIS MIGHT BE EQUALLY AS BENEFICIAL TO THE COMMUNITY, BUT LESS COMPLEX. >> I HAD SOMETHING ON THE GENERAL PLAN. SINCE WE ARE GOING TO GENERAL PLAN. PAGE 820 TO 824, THIS IS A DISADVANTAGED AREA OF THE COMMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN LISTENED TO. WE ASSESS THE NEED OFF OF THOSE DISADVANTAGED AREAS. I HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A PROBLEM WITH IT. IN HUNDRED 22 EAST OF MAINE. THIS IS ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHERN PART OF THE CITY. OUT EAST. THE THING IS, IT IS NOT SHOWN AS A DISADVANTAGED AREA OR COMMUNITY. YOU HAVE TAKEN ALL OF THE NEW BUILDING, AND YOU HAVE BEEN BUILDING IN THE NORTHERN PART. THIS INCLUDES THOSE AREAS THAT THEY BRING UP THE SOCIAL ECONOMIC VALUE. THE SITUATION WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE MAP, IF YOU ARE GOING SOUTH OF CYPRUS, AND EAST OF MAIN STREET, YOU ARE NOW MOVING MORE INTO A SOCIAL ECONOMIC DEPRIVED AREA. I HAVE DIFFICULTY WITH GOING BY A CENSUS TRACT. I KNOW RIGHT HERE, AROUND CITY HALL, THIS IS A DISADVANTAGED AREA IN THE GENERAL PLAN. THIS IS A LITTLE STRETCH. IT COMES OFF OF THE EAST OF MAIN STREET. THEY GO SOUTH. THERE IS NO DOUBT IN ANYONE'S MIND. THIS IS PART OF THE EXPENSE YEAR HE COMMUNITY. WE ARE GOING WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE EFFORT WHEN WE DO IT. THIS IS IN REGARDS TO SOME OF OUR AREAS. USE THESE TRAPS, RATHER THAN LOOKING AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT THERE WAS NOTHING SOUTH OF MAINE OR SOUTH OF CYPRUS THAT I SAW ON 223. WE HAVE A DIFFERENT STREETS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE A NEW BLACKTOP. I APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU. >> COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? YOU MENTIONED YOU WERE GOING TO HAVE DISCUSSION ON OTHER ITEMS? THEY WERE TRYING TO SAY THAT. WERE YOU TRYING TO INCLUDE ANY OF THAT? >> I'M TRYING TO DISCUSS ITEMS. I DON'T THINK YOU WANT ME TO DISCUSS ITEMS WHILE WE ARE TRYING TO GET QUESTIONS. >> IS OF THE TIME FOR QUESTION AND DISCUSSION. >> YOU WANT ME TO DISCUSS NOW? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S START WITH PROJECT 268, 269, MAIN STREET AND DELTA ROAD. THOSE HAVE BEEN IN NEED FOR A LONG TIME. I DO NOTICE IT. THEY WILL BE LESS THAN FUNDED. I'M NOT SURE PROJECT 13, COULD NOT GO IN THERE. WE ARE NOT BEING SPECIFIC ON THE TRAFFIC. WE CAN SAY IT IS RIGHT THERE. I AM TRYING TO FURTHER THE DISCUSSION. >> LET'S TALK ABOUT THOSE TWO. MAIN STREET, THEY HAVE ALL OF THESE PROJECTS. PLAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL HERE, AND CALL IT GOOD. THIS IS MORE COMPLICATED THAN THAT. THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. WE ARE TRYING TO ADJUST THE NEEDS OF THOSE INTERSECTIONS. WE ARE GOING TO CALL IT GOOD. WE HAVE A LEFT TURN AND RIGHT TURN LANE. THIS IS THAT AREA. THEY OWNED IT. THERE IS NEVER ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT AWAY ON MAIN STREET. WE CREATED THOSE TWO CIP'S AS PART OF A PREVIOUS YEAR PROJECT. WE DID SOME CONCEPTUAL STUDIES, JUST TO SEE WHAT WE NEED. WE ARE JUST TRYING TO LAY THAT OUT. WE HAVE SO MANY SQUARE FEET. WE DO HAVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, AND WE NEED TO TAKE THOSE, WITH THE RESPECTIVE PROPERTY OWNERS. TALK TO THEM, THE SAME THING WE ARE DOING ON PROJECT 273. THIS IS THE SAME PROJECT ON LAUREL ROAD. I'M GOING TO GO TALK TO THEIR FOLKS. THIS IS THE ALIGNMENT. WE HAVE THE SAME DIALOGUE READ THIS IS BEFORE WE CAN SAY THAT THESE PROJECTS COST THAT MUCH AMOUNT OF DOLLARS. $54,000 TRAFFIC COMMUNICATION IS NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING. THIS INCLUDES THE SPEED HUMP. A FEW YEARS AGO, WE ARE TRYING TO LOOK AT THESE THREE BIDS. THIS IS ABOUT $5000 PER PIECE. 2024, IF I WANT TO SPEED HUMP. THIS IS NOT MUCH WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE INTERSECTION THAT IS GOING TO COST HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. THIS IS NOT ANYTHING. WE HAVE VARIOUS STAGES. THESE ARE SOME OF THE BIGGER ONES. CIP 247, LAUREL ROAD. WE ARE GOING UNDER CONSTRUCTION. $50,000 PROJECT, WE HAVE DONE. EACH OF THEM HAVE THEIR OWN SCHEDULE AND PHASE. WE ARE IGNORING THOSE PROJECTS. WE ARE TRYING TO REPRICE OR TYPE THIS. WE HAVE SOME OF THE FUNDING TO ALLOCATE FOR CYPRUS. WE HAVE ANOTHER CONCEPT OF STUDIES. I WILL HAVE TO GET ENGAGED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THEY REALLY WILL HAVE SOME DISCUSSIONS. WE ARE NOT DOING IT. WE HAVE TO CONDEMN THEM. THIS IS THE COUNSEL. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE COUNCIL WISHES. ALL OF THIS TAKES TIME. NONE OF THIS WE TELL OUR STAFF. THE STAFF IS ON ALL OF THE PROJECT RUNNING. I JUST HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE TO ALLOCATE THE PROPER RESOURCE FOR THESE VARIOUS PROJECTS. >> BE PATIENT. >> I WOULDN'T SAY BE PATIENT, IT IS A WORK IN PROGRESS. AS MUCH AS I WOULD LOVE TO BLINK MY HANDS, AND ALL OF IT GETS BUILT, IT TAKES TIME. THAT IS NOT DUE TO LACK OF EFFORT. WE HAVE MANY PROJECTS. IT WAS A COMPLEX PROJECT. I INVITE YOU TO COME TO THE MEETINGS THAT WE HAVE THE DESIGNERS. THEY COME ACROSS THE WATER DISTRICT, TO SEE THE COMPLEXITY OF THIS PROJECT. LET'S GO OUT THERE, DONE SOME ASPHALT, CONCRETE, AND CALL IT GOOD. WE HAVE DETAILED THINGS. I'M TELLING YOU, THAT PROJECT CIP 10, IS ONE OF THE MOST COMPLEX PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE SEEN IN MY CAREER. I HAVE SEEN GOOD PROJECTS. THIS THING HAS ALL OF THEM. WE ARE CROSSING OVER AND UNDER. YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE OPERATIONAL TRAFFIC GOING. IF THOSE PROJECTS WERE EASY, I GUARANTEE YOU THAT SOMEONE WOULD HAVE DONE IT A LONG TIME AGO. I'M SURE SOMEBODY LOOKED AT IT. NOT GOING TO TOUCH THIS. WE ARE WORKING ON ALL THESE PROJECTS. EACH OF THEM HAVE THEIR OWN LIFECYCLE. >> ON THE LAUREL EXTENSION, I BROUGHT THAT UP MAINLY BECAUSE IT DOES GO THROUGH THE COMMUNITY. I DO SUPPORT IT. I HAVE SUPPORTED IT. THE COMMUNITY DOES NEED IT. THE PEOPLE IN THE AREA WILL GET SOME BENEFIT. THEY WILL ALSO GET THE COMMUNITY DIVIDED WITH MORE NOISE POLLUTION. THEY WILL HAVE MORE AIR-QUALITY SITUATIONS. LOOK WHAT WE ALL DID FOR THE PEOPLE EAST OF MAIN STREET AROUND EAST AND LAUREL STREET. WE BUILT THIS ROAD. IT IS MAINLY BENEFITING EAST CYPRUS. WE ARE LOOKING TO SIPHON OFF THE TRAFFIC OFFICE EAST CYPRUS, AND SEND IT OUT TO LAUREL. THE RESIDENTS WILL GET SOME BENEFIT. AS THIS CONTINUES, THERE WILL BE LESS BENEFITS. >> DR. FULLER, AS THE PROJECT EVOLVES THROUGH ITS OWN LIFECYCLE, IT WILL GET FULLY GONE THROUGH. IT IS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. ANY ISSUES AS I POINTED OUT, WILL MITIGATE ALL OF THESE PROJECTS. NOISE, TRAFFIC, YOU NAME IT. >> WE HAVE THE STAFF THAT IS CONSCIENTIOUS OF IT. I'M NOT FAULTING THE CITY FOR IT. I SAID I SUPPORT IT. I'M DOING THIS FOR THE CITY. THIS IS PART OF THE DISCLOSURE. THIS IS WHEN WE MOVE IN. THAT IS NOT IT. DON'T SAY WE ARE DOING A LOT FOR THE EAST OF MAIN STREET, BECAUSE WE BUILT THE SELLERS EXTENSION. THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY BENEFIT OR GET THINGS UP, EAST OF MAIN STREET, IF YOU GET WHAT I'M SAYING. >> I DON'T THINK I SAID IT THAT WAY. IT IS OKAY. >> I DON'T KNOW. >> FROM THE LIBRARY, IT IS EMBARRASSING. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY. IT IS EMBARRASSING. WE HAVE PARKED ACROSS THE STREET. WE ARE TRYING TO GET TO THE LIBRARY. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU DO. I DON'T THINK IT WILL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS TO GET THERE. YOU ARE USING A WALKER, OR SOMETHING ELSE RIGHT THERE. GETTING ACROSS THE STREET, GETTING OVER THERE, YOU HAVE TO STUMBLE ALONG, AND GET ACROSS AND STUMBLE BACK. IT IS A DISTANCE FROM THE PARKING LOT EVEN OUT INTO MAIN STREET. THIS IN THE FIRST THING THAT WAS COMING INTO MY MIND. IN ADDITION, I LIVED IN THE CITY, AND HAS SEEN FRIENDS IN THE OAKLEY LIBRARY. THEY WERE ATTEMPTING TO GET THE LIBRARY OF HER PEOPLE ON THE COUNCIL. THIS ISN'T A LIBRARY CITY. YOU CAN CONVINCE PEOPLE IN THE VOTERS, THAT THEY WILL BUILD A LIBRARY IF YOU GET THE BOND ISSUE. WE HAVE OTHER THINGS. WE HAVE A BIG PARKING LOT ACROSS THE STREET. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TRAINS COMING IN. WE HAVE A REC CENTER, THE PARK, AND SOME VERY GOOD THINGS. WE ARE FOOTING A BIG BILL ON THEM. WE ARE SENDING FRIENDS OF THE OAKLEY LIBRARY OUT AGAIN, SAYING CAN YOU DO SOMETHING FOR US? I ENCOURAGE THAT. I THINK FRIENDS OF THE OAKLEY DO THAT. I'M NOT GOING TO BE FOOLED THAT IT IS ALL ON THEM TO DO IT. THE CITY HAS NOT GIVEN IT. IT IS RIGHT. THEY DO NOT HAVE AN AMPLE PLACE. IT DOES NOT HAVE AN AMPLE PLACE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS. THIS IS AN EMBARRASSMENT THAT WHAT WE DO, WE HAVEN'T GOT IT. WE ARE SENDING IT OUT AGAIN. I KNOW I'M RIGHT ABOUT THIS. THE BIGGEST FEAR WITH THE ELECTRIC COMPANY, NO NEW TAXES. PEOPLE OUT IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE CITY, THEY ARE PAYING ENOUGH TAXES. NO NEW TAXES AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED. I'M WORRIED THAT WHILE WE ARE GETTING IT ALREADY, WE ARE GOING TO THROW IT OUT AND GIVE IT TO A VOTE AGAIN. I'M AFRAID WE ARE HEADING FOR IT. NOW WE HAVE IT FOR THE BOND ISSUE. AGAIN, THAT IS AN INSULT TO THEM. THEY HAVE NEVER HAD THE PROJECT LATE FUND. IT HASN'T HAPPENED. >> WE HAVE ALLOCATED $7.5 MILLION TOWARDS THE LIBRARY PROJECT. THAT IS GOING TO BE WITHIN THE BUDGET THAT PRESENTED ITSELF TO YOU JANUARY 11th. WE HAVE MADE SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS. WE HAVE DONE A LOT OF LEG WORK, TO GET TO WHERE WE ARE AT RIGHT NOW. WE HAVE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH THE OPEN SENIORS MANY TIMES, ABOUT THE PROJECT. THEY ARE WELL AWARE OF IT. THE COMMENTS TONIGHT, DON'T CHARACTERIZE THOSE DISCUSSIONS EXACTLY. THERE WILL BE PARKING AT THE FACILITY, AS THERE IS PARKING AT OUR FACILITY IN CAMPUS NOW. WE ARE NOT EXPECTING EVERY USER OF THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT ACROSS THE STREET AND PARKING SPACES, THAT WE HAVE CONSTRUCTED, TO BE ABLE TO WALK TO THE LIBRARY. THAT WILL HAPPEN IN INSTANCES. THE DEMAND FOR THE LIBRARY INCREASES. SURE. WE ARE DOING OUR BEST TO PLAN FOR SPACES FOR COMMUNITY USES. THE REASON WHY WE ARE NOT CALLING IT SPECIFICALLY A SENIOR CENTER, OR A VETERANS SPACE, FOR ANY SPECIFIC GROUP, THIS NAME, THE OAKLEY LIBRARY CENTER, WILL OTHERWISE BE CLOSED OFF IF YOU ARE SO SPECIFIC. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A MULTITUDE OF USES UNDER ONE ROOF. IT IS NOT WELL DEFINED. WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THE FUNDING IS RIGHT NOW. WE DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE, BUT WHEN WE DO, WE CAN START DIGGING IN, AND DEFINING THE SPACE. THEY ARE TRYING TO DEFINE HOW IT IS GOING TO FUNCTION. I ENVISION THE CITY TAKING OVER THE PROGRAMMING. THIS IS QUITE COMMON FOR CITIES TO PROGRAM SENIOR CENTERS AND SPACES THAT THE SENIORS USE. THIS IS GOING TO BE A SHIFT IN HOW THINGS ARE DONE. CHANGE I KNOW IS DIFFICULT. IT IS INEVITABLE. I BELIEVE WE WILL CONSTRUCT THE LIBRARY HERE ON CENTER CAMPUS. I DON'T KNOW HOW BIG IT WILL BE. >> THANK YOU. >> WE ARE DOING SOMETHING REALLY POSITIVE. THIS IS A FORM OF ATTACK. IN OTHER WORDS, WE BUILT THE REC CENTER. WE ARE PAYING $2 MILLION A YEAR FOR THE NEXT 15 YEARS TO PAY FOR IT. THIS IS BECAUSE HE WANTED A CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION. WE HAVE ALL THESE OTHER THINGS BUILT ACROSS THE STREET. IT BECAME A MATTER OF PRIORITIES. THE LIBRARY CAME UP LAST. IT'S AN AMOUNT, IT IS FINE. DON'T SAY IT AS A TAX. ATTACKS ON THE TIME AND EFFORT. ATTACKS OF THE HOUSEHOLD INCOME. ATTACKS ON OTHER PEOPLE WHO REALLY WANT TO SEE THE LIBRARY. THEY REALLY WANT TO SEE IT BUILT. WE REALLY NEED TO RALLY BEHIND THE LIBRARY, AND GET IT GOING. THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS. IT WAS BUILT WHERE HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN. IT WAS ORIGINALLY PUT THERE. I THINK THIS PLACE WILL BE THE BEST. I DON'T THINK WE WILL NEED A TRAIN STOP. WE NEED A CIVIC CENTER WITH A LIBRARY, AND A PLACE WHERE WE HAVE SENIORS CALM, AND PLAY BINGO. ALL OF THOSE GOOD THINGS. THAT WOULD GET DOWNTOWN PUZZLING. I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED ANY MORE BUSTLING IN TOWN. WE ARE TRYING TO SEE IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE GOOD FOR THE TOWN. I'M ASSURING YOU MY HESITATIONS ON THAT ONE. ADA. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SAY IT. STEPHEN HAWKINS, THE ASTROPHYSICIST, HE DIED IN A WHEELCHAIR. HE HAD ALS. HE WAS CRIPPLED IN THE LAST PART OF HIS LIFE. PEOPLE TOLD HIM THAT HE MUST HAVE MADE GOD MAD, AND HAVE REALLY SINNED, BECAUSE GOD CRIPPLED HIM. THAT IS TRUE. EVERYBODY HAS THEIR OWN GOD READ YOU CAN DO WHAT YOU WANT. THAT'S WHAT THE DISABILITY COMMUNITY DEALS WITH. YOU DON'T THINK I DON'T? WHEN I RIDE TO SCHOOL? THE UNIVERSITY OF SEVEN CISCO? MY SERVICE DOG WAS SO PROUD. THIS WAS CONSTANTLY. DON'T THINK THAT THERE WAS NOTHING GOING ON. THE SOLUTION IS, WHY DIDN'T YOU COME HOME AFTER CLASS? YOUR STUDENTS ARE THROWING THINGS AT ME. WHY DON'T YOU MAKE IT EASY FOR US? IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP THIS TOGETHER. THAT IS LIFE. THE ADA WAS ASSIGNED 34 YEARS AGO AT THE LAST CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. 1980, GEORGE H.W. BUSH READ HE SIGNED THAT IN. IT WAS A CIVIL RIGHT. I HAVE SHOWN THE PICTURE OF HERE -- UP HERE, THE EIGHT-YEAR-OLD WHO CRAWLED UP THE CAPITOL STEPS, TO DEMONSTRATE THAT SHE COULDN'T VISIT HER CAPITOL, BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAVE THE PROPER ELEVATORS. SHE PUT ASIDE HER FOREARM CRUTCHES, AND CLIMBED UP THE STEPS, ALONG WITH OTHER PEOPLE. THAT WAS ENOUGH TO PUSH IT OVER TO BE SIGNED. I GET MYSELF AND OTHERS, SOMEWHAT VERY DISAPPOINTED WE JUST PUT IT ASIDE. IF YOU ARE GOING TO PUT IT ON THE CITY COUNCIL, THEY HAVE NOT OWNED UP TO IT. NOT FOR 34 YEARS HAVE THEY OWNED UP TO IT. I AM SEEING THE SHELF DOWN HERE FOR THE WHEELCHAIR. WHEELCHAIR SHELF. JUST WALKING OUT. YOU WILL SEE THE UPPER COUNTER AND A LOWER COUNTER. THAT IS WHAT IT MEANS. DON'T THINK THAT THOSE ARE JUST ISOLATED INCIDENTS. IF YOU ARE DISABLED, YOU JUST GO THROUGH THEM ON A DAILY BASIS. MICRO AGGRESSIONS. WHEN I WAS DOING MY STUDY, I WAS COMPLETING MY DISSERTATION. STUDENTS WERE TELLING ME ABOUT WHAT THEY LAUGH AT. HE USED TO BE ACCEPTED. I KEPT MY MOUTH SHUT. AT THE AGE OF 25, WHAT THEY WERE AROUND IN COLLEGE, THEY JUST SAW THAT AS NORMAL. THEY HAVE MICRO AGGRESSIONS AND JOKES. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO IN ALL DAY, AND HAVE SOMEONE PICKING AT YOU ONE PLACE OR ANOTHER? IS IT BECAUSE OF HIS DISABILITY? WHEN I SIT UP HERE, WE STILL SAY THAT WE WILL GET AROUND TO IT. AS MANY AS $100 MILLION. ALL I CAN SAY, WE ARE WORTH IT. NOT A WHOLE PERSON. I AM THE WHOLE PERSON. I FUNCTION QUITE WELL. I DO ASK FOR THE COMBINATIONS TO BE UPHELD. THAT ALLOWS ME TO BE HERE. I CAN COME APPEAR, AND SAID APPEAR, AND MAKE A CONTRIBUTION. I CAN VOTE. I CAN VOTE ON THIS. I CAN MAKE A CONTRIBUTION. I AM A WHOLE PERSON. YOU ARE REALLY NOT WHOLE. THIS IS TOUGH. YOU HAVE GOT TO GET THE JOB DONE. IS TO GO OFF, LIKE I SAID BEFORE, I HAVE ASKED THEM. IT IS ALWAYS SOMEBODY ELSE, OR SOMETHING. IT IS NEVER THEM COMING THROUGH. THE COUNCIL HAS NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO SAY NO ABOUT IMPROVING IT, REALLY. BEYOND THAT, I SAID THERE WAS NOTHING EAST OF CYPRUS. THAT IS TRUE. THEY ARE RESURFACING. LAST YEAR, LOOKING AT IMPROVEMENTS. THIS YEAR, I DON'T SEE ANYTHING ON THE SITE CIP, EXCEPT FOR THE WIDENING. THAT IS GOING TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY. WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY OUT THERE. WE ARE NOT GETTING THE TRAFFIC. THIS IS NOT THAT PART OF THE TOWN. WE ARE GETTING IT DONE. WE ARE TAKING THINGS AWAY. WE ARE COMING TO BUDGET. SET RESERVES THAT WERE SET BY THE COUNCIL. THIS IS 20%. THE REVENUES ARE DOWN. I DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH DIPPING IN. THIS IS PART OF THE RESERVES. THIS IS THE SIGNAL. THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A RAINY DAY. MAYBE YOU MISUNDERSTOOD, AND YOU WILL WAKE UP FOR THE BUDGET ON THAT. I WILL STOP RIGHT THERE. >> MAY I? >> THIS IS REGARDING YOUR COMMENTS. THIS IS GOING TO BE PART OF THE PROJECT. WE ARE AT THE INFANT STAGES OF IT. THIS IS GOING TO BE IN THE BACK OF IT. THIS IS GOING TO BE A FULL COMPLEMENT OF PARKING LOTS. THIS IS PART OF THE DISABILITY GOING CROSS STREET. THIS IS WHAT HAS YOU COMING BACK TO THE DEPARTMENT. WE ARE LOOKING AT ALL FACETS OF THE COMMUNITY. THE LIBRARY IS NOT LOOKING AT THE ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING LOT. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE LACK OF IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF MAIN STREET. IN ADDITION TO THE MAINSTREAM SERVICES THAT WERE INCREASED FROM THE PARKING SPOT FROM LESTER, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE DONE OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS. WE HAVE RESURFACED LAUREL ROAD FROM MAIN STREET, ALL THE WAY TO CREEKSIDE PARK. YOU DRIVE TO IT EVERY DAY. THE SUBDIVISION WEST OF CREEKSIDE WAY, LOOKING AT CREEKSIDE PARK, THIS WAS ANOTHER FAST FIVE YEARS. WE HAVE DIFFERENT TRAFFIC MEASURES, AT THE REQUEST OF THE COMMUNITY. CREEKSIDE PARK, IS A CITY MANAGER MENTIONED, THIS IS GOING TO BE BROUGHT UP TO THE COUNCIL LATER THIS SUMMER. WE HAVE BROUGHT DISCUSSIONS. I KNOW YOU HAVE BEEN TO THE CREEKSIDE PARK OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS. A MAJOR ENHANCEMENT THAT WE DID FOR THE PARK, IS WHAT WE CONSIDERED OUR BEST BARBECUE STAND. THAT PARK, IT IS HEAVILY USED. IT IS A VERY PRETTY PARK. THIS IS A GOOD FEEL. IT IS VERY POPULAR. WE HAVE A LOT OF CALLS FROM PEOPLE. WE WILL GET A CHANCE TO VISIT THAT. IT IS NICE AND FUN. IT IS COMMERCIAL FUTURE ACTIONS FOR PARTIES AND PICNICS. THEY HAVE RECEIVED IT VERY WELL. WE HAVE DONE AN ASSORTMENT OF THINGS. WE DON'T LOOK AT THE SOCIAL ECONOMIC PARTS OF IT. NOT ON ANY PROJECTS. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT PEOPLE SAY WHAT THEY SAY. YOU ARE DOING THIS PROJECT BECAUSE YOU ARE DISCOUNTS. THIS IS FAR FROM IT. WHEN WE DESIGN STREET SURFACES, YOU LOOK AT THE TOTALITY OF ALL OF THE STREETS. WE ARE GOING TO LOOK AT SOME RESURFACING. MINOR RESURFACING. IT IS HARD TO REALLOCATE WHATEVER FUNDS THAT WE HAVE. MANY FACTORS COME INTO IT. THE PRODUCT THAT I MENTIONED LAST YEAR, IT IS COVERING MULTIPLE PARTS OF THIS TOWN. WE SURFACED ANOTHER SUBDIVISION. I HAS PEOPLE FROM THE MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION. YOU ARE RESURFACING IT. I HAVE TO TELL THEM TO BE PATIENT. I WILL GET TO YOU. I HAVE TO WORK THE FUNDING. NONE OF THESE IS BECAUSE WE ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION. I PAY ATTENTION TO A LOT OF DETAILS. THIS IS THE IMPACT ACROSS THE COMMUNITY. WHETHER IT IS STAFF, FUNDING, OR ALL ASPECTS OF IT. WHAT BRINGS THE BEST VALUE AND FILLS THE IMMEDIATE NEEDS? THE PROJECTS THAT YOU MENTIONED, WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE ACQUISITION. WE HAVE TO TALK TO PEOPLE. YOU KNOW OUR STAFF. IT IS NOT AS IF YOU HAVE 50 PEOPLE, AND EVERYBODY CAN WORK ON THESE PROJECTS. EAST CYPRESS ROAD TAKES A LOT OF TIME. WE HAVE REALLY HAD TO REPOSITION STAFFING ASSESSMENTS TO FOCUS ON THAT. EVERY DAY, WE ARE WORKING ON CYPRUS. I CAN CONTINUE TO CONTEND, CONSULT, DESIGN, AND FINISH PLANS. THERE ARE SO MANY ISSUES. SO MANY COMPLEX ISSUES. THIS INCLUDES THE UTILITY COMPANIES. THERE ARE A LOT OF COMPLEX TIMES. EVENTUALLY YOU RUN OUT OF HOURS IN THE DAY. ALL OF THESE PROJECTS GET ATTENTION FROM US. >> ONE OF YOUR GRACE AND COMPETENCE FOR ME IN MY MIND, IT IS THAT PLAYGROUND OUT THERE. THAT IS A CONSTANT. I HAVE SEEN OTHER PLAYGROUNDS IN THE AREA GO. I KNOW A LOT OF IT IS FUNDING. WE ARE GOING TO SEEK MORE FUNDING FROM DIFFERENT AREAS. I UNDERSTAND. I HAVE SEEN YOUR WORK. I HAVE SEEN WHAT YOU HAVE DONE. I DON'T KNOW. EVERY TIME I DRIVE BY IT, SOMEONE IS ON THE PLAYGROUND. >> THIS PLAYGROUND, FROM THE MOMENT THE SUN IS UP, I HAVE PLAYGROUNDS WATCHING. IT IS BUSY UNTIL DARK. >> I'M GLAD IT IS IN OUR DIAGRAMS. I DIDN'T SEE IT AT FIRST WITH THE CENTER AND THE LIBRARY. IF I'M STILL AROUND, DON'T TOUCH THAT PART. >> THIS IS NEXT TO THE PARK. THE LIBRARY USES IT NEXT TO THE PARK. THEY CAN PLAY AND READ BOOKS. >> COUNCILMEMBER MEADOWS? >> LEARNING THE SYSTEM? >> IT IS MY FIRST TIME. >> I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS TRUE, WAS IT? WOULD YOU THERE BEFORE? I'M LOOKING AT THE LIST OF CIP PROJECTS. I WANT TO SAY, I'M OKAY WITH EVERYTHING YOU GUYS HAVE. I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PRIORITIES HAVE BEEN FOR THE LAST THREE PLUS YEARS THAT THREE OF US HAVE SET HERE. I THINK THE VICE MAYOR AND THE COUNCILMEMBER, THEY AGREED WITH THESE PRIORITIES, I BELIEVE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CERTAIN AREAS. DISTRICT 1, ONLY ONE PROJECT LISTED. 274. THIS IS THE FULLY WROTE RESURFACING BUDGET. I UNDERSTAND. I UNDERSTAND WHAT OUR PRIORITIES ARE ACROSS CITY. CYPRESS ROAD, HAS BEEN A PRIORITY. I SAID THIS LAST MEETING. THIS HAS BEEN A PRIORITY FROM DAY ONE. I THINK WE KNOW IT RIGHT HERE. IT WOULD BE NICE IF THE CITIZENS UNDERSTOOD THAT. WE ARE PUTTING A HUGE EFFORT AND AMOUNT OF MONEY INTO IMPROVING CYPRESS. THE LAUREL EXTENSION DOES BENEFIT EVERYBODY ELSE OUT THERE ALSO. I'M GOOD WITH THE WAY THE CIP BUDGET IS LAID OUT. THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS. >> IF THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, I WILL NOW HAVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR VOTE. >> OKAY. FIRST OF ALL, POINT OF INFORMATION, CURRENTLY, WE ARE APPROVING THE FACT THAT NO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ARE IN ACCORDANCE, AND DON'T CONFLICT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. THAT IS THE MOTION THAT WOULD BE ON THE TABLE, CORRECT? >> THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IS GENERATING WITH THE CITY OF OAKLEY SECTION 65401 AND 65402 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. >> THANK YOU FOR THAT. ARE THERE GOING TO BE ANY ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES TO TALK ABOUT SPECIFIC PROJECTS? IS THIS ANYTHING THAT THE CIP COVERS? IS THIS IT? >> THIS IS IT. >> NO PROBLEM. OKAY. PLANNING COMMISSION, THEY DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION? >> I'M CURIOUS ABOUT THE PROJECT. I WANT TO MAKE A QUICK COMMENT. I WANT TO APPRECIATE DR. FULLER'S COMMENTS, AND THE FOLKS TODAY WHO SHOWED UP TO GIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS. I THINK WITH ALL OF THIS CHANGE, IT IS NOT SMOOTH. CHANGE IS CONSTANT. WHAT WE CAME TO AGREE TO, AS A PLACE FOR FAMILIES. PART OF OUR FAMILIES ARE ELDERS. ALL OF MY GRANDPARENTS LIVE IN OAKLEY. I WAS A LITTLE SHOCKED BY 304. BEING THE ADA LIMIT. I WAS ALSO 314. I HAVE FULL FAITH IN OUR CITY BEING BUILT BY THE CITY, CREATING ADA ACCESSIBLE PLACES. PLACES FOR ELDERS RIGHT OUTSIDE OF THESE WALLS. THIS IS FROM MY COMMUNITY. FOLKS WERE DANCING. I'M IN FAVOR OF WHERE WE ARE MOVING WITH THE CIP. JUST THE ONE CAVEAT, I LOVE THAT PARK TOO. THE ROME WALL COULD USE SOME COLOR. I JUST WANT TO NUDGE THE CITY TO CONSIDER MORE OPPORTUNITIES. CITY AND CITY COUNCIL, TO CONSIDER MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC ART. WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE THIS AN INCLUSIVE PLACE FOR OUR ELDERS. IT IS THAT OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE AND MATCH WITH DEMOCRACY. I WILL MAKE A MOTION. DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE COMMENTS? MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. >> SECOND. >> MOVED AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER RAMIREZ AND COMMISSIONER CRAIG. ALL THOSE PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. >> AYE. >> GOES AGAINST, SAINT NAY. HEARING NONE, THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >> THINK YOU GUYS FOR THIS JOINT MEETING. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I HAD ASKED FOR, TO ALLOW US TO HAVE A COLLABORATIVE CONVERSATION, AND BE ALL ON THE SAME TEAM. I CAN APPRECIATE YOUR TIME THAT EVERYONE IS TAKING OUT OF THEIR DAY, AND EVERYONE THAT IS IN ATTENDANCE. IF THERE IS NO FURTHER BUSINESS, WE WILL ADJOURN THIS MEETING.

Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council and Oakley Planning Commission held May 21, 2024 1) CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Vice Mayor Shaw called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Oakley City Councilmembers Hugh Henderson, Dr. George Fuller and Aaron Meadows were also present along with Planning Commissioner Chair Oleksii Chuiko, Vice Chair Diego Verduzco, and Commissioners Jeanne Krieg and Jimmy Ramirez. Vice Mayor Shaw announced that Mayor Williams and Commissioner Price were absent. 2) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Vice Mayor Shaw led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 3) PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 4) WORK SESSION 4.1 Adopt a Resolution Finding that the Proposed 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Oakley as required by sections 65401 and 65402 of the Government Code. (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. Public comments Donna Baker, first Vice President of the Oakley Seniors, thanked Mr. Rohani for the proposed projects as they are all much needed. She shared that her daughter lives in Summer Lake and has been through 2 evacuations due to fires, one of which she was able to drive out and another which she was not and was in her car for over 2 hours. She mentioned over a year ago, she stood before the Council to request help for the Senior Center to keep it open provide ongoing support, not just for seniors but also for

everyone who comes to its door for assistance and food which is provided by non- profits that they allow to use the building, i.e., Veterans, 4-H, Meals on Wheels, and CCC Café. She mentioned years ago they were informed the building would be demolished and they were excited when they found out that the site would be shared with the new Library and it was a disappointment to see no space dedicated specifically for the Senior Center in the architect plans, but rather 980 sq. ft.+ 1420 sq. ft. of two flex community rooms allocated when space is available. She expressed that the Senior Center needs to expand, not contract, to be larger than the current 4,000+ sq. ft. space because they would like to expand. She mentioned like other senior centers, they would like a commercial kitchen, an area for CCC Café to provide lunches 5 days a week, a common area, a place for Tri-Delta parking, senior parking, an office, a reception area, a storeroom, and offices for Oakley Veterans and Meals on Wheels. She mentioned they would like a partnership with the City as one of the only few senior clubs remaining in California and to her knowledge, the only group providing services, classes, and enrichment for seniors in Oakley. She inquired why the Senior Center is not included in the City’s plan and the architectural plans. She mentioned she believes the Library is needed, she will continue to try and work on funding, and she would like to see the Oakley Senior Center as part of the plan. She introduced others present with her: Allen Perry (President) Richard (member), and Mike Castro (Board Member). Mike Castro commented that the proposed Library/Community Center has no mention for the Oakley seniors; they are being pushed to the curb. He mentioned to have to park across the street at the train station is an accident eventually to happen with seniors using canes, walkers, etc. He mentioned there should be a place with enough parking and space for the Oakley Seniors to have their functions and not bother the Library/Community Center. He asked if the Recreation Center is a community center. He mentioned this is ludicrous. Vice Mayor Shaw opened the discussion for questions and comments from the Council and Commission. Commissioner Ramirez referred to the presentation slide addressing CIPs 247, 302, and 310. He mentioned he appreciates the comment regarding hazard mitigation and the City’s foresight to expand this entryway. He mentioned it meets the complete streets requirements, but he is thinking about bike and pedestrian safety. He inquired if they would be allowed to switch the design to tree, sidewalk, bike, tree to protect bicyclists. He shared that he is thinking of the future 55-acre park and Oakley as a future walkable and bikeable place and would like to know if it is something they can consider. Mr. Rohani responded that he will take a look. He explained it is more involved than making a simple switch. He shared that the section of Laurel Road from Empire to O'Hara that was improved about 3 years ago, has bike lanes that create a 2 ft. buffer zone with the travel lane; it is the same thing they plan to do on E. Cypress Road. He mentioned that with the prior standard, the bike lane would be next to the traffic lane; however, bicyclists may not have been comfortable bicycling next to high-speed traffic. He shared that Phase 1 of the project is going to be under construction, and Phases 2 and 3 are under design so this would have to be studied. He indicated he will look at

those changes, all projects must meet the streets safe program, and he will let him know later, but at this time, this is the design they are pursuing. Chair Chuiko inquired about the timeline of the Laurel Road Extension Project. Mr. Rohani responded that his goal is to finalize the right-of-way acquisitions this year and then focus on funding; this is a $40 million project so they are looking for grant fund opportunities and that will determine the schedule. He mentioned that the final design/project design could take a year, permits from the County and railroad could take a year, and if the City had money in bank which it doesn’t, it could probably start construction in 3 years. Chair Chuiko inquired if there are any smaller projects that Mr. Rohani would like to share. Mr. Rohani mentioned the smaller projects are included in the packet. He mentioned the focus for the next 2 years is E. Cypress and Laurel Road. He added that a smaller project they do every year is the Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Replacement program, a $100- $150k project. He explained that throughout the community, developed trees may uproot sidewalks and the California Vehicle Code holds the property owner responsible. He mentioned several years ago, they worked with the Council to develop a 50/50 cost sharing program where staff bundles many of the sites of repair and bids collectively according to the economies of scale for the work which is a good deal for the property owner because they are billed at half of the cost; it is a 50/50 program but in reality, it is close to 70/30 (City/owner) because the City does all the leg work and the property owner receives an invoice. He mentioned there is also money set aside for traffic calming. He mentioned smaller projects may take 6 months or so and major projects can take years. Chair Chuiko thanked Mr. Rohani for always making it a priority to keep the community safe and for thinking of property owners. Mr. Rohani mentioned that with streets and parks they focus and allocate resources the best way possible with the Strategic Goals the Council has set across the board; the City’s needs are huge. Commissioner Ramirez mentioned he was a little bummed not to see art projects in the CIP Plan. He inquired if in considering the Planning Commission’s vote and the future of Oakley, if Mr. Rohani could share his favorite art project in Oakley, his vision for public art, and any barriers getting in the way of public art. Mr. Rohani shared that the bird sculpture in the median of 2nd and Main Streets in the Downtown is his favorite. He mentioned the new project at the intersection of Main Street and O’Hara Avenue will have a Plaza monument installed by next month; it is a large granite rock with the history of Oakley etched in stone. He mentioned funding for public art, and a program to integrate public art, whether it be the City, citizens, or developer, starts at a policy level and must be part of a program, not done haphazardly. He mentioned they can go through various officials and boards for policy, and public-

private partnership if developers will be involved, which has provided community benefit in other communities. Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned the Library will have a donor wall of which they would try to engage a local artist so she believes they do it when they can. As a point of order, Dr. Fuller inquired if the Council and Planning Commission will ask questions then provide comments. Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned it is a work session which allows questions and comments of the City Council and Planning Commission. Dr. Fuller mentioned the agenda segments them. He requested clarification. Assistant City Attorney Elizabeth Fratarcangeli responded that there is no need to have it formally segmented, it is less formal, and the floor is open to the Planning Commission and City Council to ask questions. Dr. Fuller mentioned Project 273 from Laurel to Sellers will benefit E. Cypress residents. He mentioned when they build it, it will split the community from Laurel to Main and the community back into Sellers; the extension will split the community and add noise and pollution to those communities bordering it the way he sees it. Mr. Rohani mentioned from Sellers Avenue driving toward Pecan and Laurel at the railroad track, there is a development project/subdivision being built right now of which they have dedicated right-of-way for this roadway so there will be changes; that is the nature of life. He mentioned that area has been a sleepy agricultural community and with development, that is slowly changing. He mentioned any project will have full environmental reviews and anything deemed unnecessary will be mitigated. He also mentioned that this project provides a secondary route from E. Cypress Road to Laurel Road to HWY 4. Dr. Fuller commented that Cinquini Park will cost $5-6 million which Mr. Rohani confirmed is correct. Regarding Project 314 ADA, Dr. Fuller mentioned it has been 34 years and they are still putting in $50k to rectify $100 million in ADA deficiencies. He mentioned some people do not see him as whole as he uses a cane and service dog. Mr. Rohani confirmed the amount is correct. He explained that years ago, the City adopted an ADA Improvement Plan that evaluated where improvements are needed throughout the City and there is missing compliance. He mentioned $100 million in improvements is needed and every year, ADA improvements are allocated $50k, a drop in the bucket compared to the $100 million needed, but the City tries to spread funding across the board. He mentioned there are ADA improvements happening outside of this such as facilities’ compliance and adding or enhancing wheelchair ramps at intersections by upgrading to current standards. He agreed with Dr. Fuller it is not close to $100 million, but the City has to look at all priorities.

Dr. Fuller commented that he is pondering how to rectify this and suggested that in the CIP, the City commit to $5 million for ADA improvements, and any CIP approved will have to be taken in total to that, and any projects not helping the City to meet the total, the City will set those aside until they honor the civil rights of the disabled, adhere to the ADA, and properly fund it. He inquired if they can realign the CIP so the City is committed to spend $5-$10 million in ADA adjustments, and projects would not be approved unless they meet it. City Manager Joshua McMurray commented that the focus on the CIP in general is to allocate $50k toward ADA, but every project (roadway, facility or park) has ADA compliance and money being spent, so it is not just $50k; it is every single project within the CIP. Dr. Fuller mentioned they can then ascertain how much of each project is going toward the ADA total. He added that he can’t see building a project without some understanding whatever part of it is payment is going toward the $100 million. Mr. McMurray mentioned it is the decision of the City Council how to allocate funds; this is what is proposed for the budget to come back on June 11, and if there needs to be a discussion on certain projects and how to prioritize those, now is the time to make those changes before it is brought back. Dr. Fuller commented that he didn’t see Creekside Park or the Bethel Island expansion. He inquired if anything will happen with those. Mr. McMurray mentioned that staff hasn’t been given direction by at least 3 Councilmembers to do any improvements at Creekside Park. He mentioned DeNova Homes will construct Bethel Island Road from the intersection to the northern boundary of their project in an interim phase, and staff is working in concert with DeNova and TI Capital for the ultimate improvement when the full perimeter levee is constructed because it will change the look of the road. Dr. Fuller inquired about the southern portion out to Delta Road. He mentioned it is his understanding that the City is buying the property so it can be expanded but he doesn’t remember the developer being on the hook for the extension from the City limit to Delta Road. Mr. McMurray responded that it is a mitigation requirement within the Specific Plan for the developer building in that Plan area, and the City Council authorized EIR work to look at that roadway, extension, and connection to Delta to see if there is an alternative path to take because there is right of way acquisition and there are many complexities to that project so staff is trying to analyze it to determine if it is the best project or if there is an alternative to consider that is equally beneficial to the community but less complex. Dr. Fuller commented on pages 820-824 regarding disadvantaged communities. He mentioned east of Main uses the Census and it’s not shown as a disadvantaged community because it takes the new building in the northern area that brings up the

socio-economic value and housing, but these are still socio-economic deprived areas. He mentioned he has difficulty in going by the Census because it doesn’t acknowledge it. He added that there is a little stretch of Malicoat but if you go further south, it is disadvantaged. He suggested that there be accurate information with the General Plan by looking at the neighborhood. Dr. Fuller commented that there is nothing east of Main or south of Cypress, and the streets in his neighborhood have a new blacktop which he and his neighbors appreciate. Vice Mayor Shaw asked Dr. Fuller if he had other discussion items. Dr. Fuller mentioned Project 268-269 is unfunded and he is not sure that Project 313 traffic calming could not go in there. Mr. Rohani mentioned that Projects 268/269 involve Main Street and Brownstone and Delta. He explained that the City doesn’t have the right-of-way to address the needs of the intersections; they need left and right turn lanes, and the intersection needs to be widened. He shared that since Caltrans owned it years ago, it has never had any additional right-of-way on Main Street and conceptual studies show alignment needs so many sq. ft.; they have a conceptual design and need to take those and engage with respective property owners as they are doing on Laurel Road from Teton to Sellers. He mentioned the discussion needs to be had before they can say it costs an amount. He explained that $30-$50k in traffic calming is not going to do anything for those intersections; speed humps a few years ago were $5k each, now in 2024, they are twice as much; the intersection will cost hundreds of thousands. He mentioned they have not ignored it and have projects at various stages of process, each project has its own schedule and phase, and needs reprioritize funding for E. Cypress; some work with amicable solution, others say condemn, but it all takes time and to allocate proper resources. Dr. Fuller commented that he hopes Mr. Rohani will not tell him to be patient. Mr. Rohani responded no, it is a work in progress and takes time, not due to lack of effort or that they don’t care; these are complex and detailed projects that require collaboration with other parties. He shared that CIP 310 E. Cypress is the most complex project he has worked on in his career because it involves crossing over, under, and operational traffic; if the project was easy, it would’ve been done long ago. Dr. Fuller commented that he supports the Laurel Extension as it will go through the community, he has and does support it, it is needed, and new people will get some benefit, but it will create more noise and air pollution. He mentioned he doesn't want to say look what we did for the people east of Main around Laurel because it is mainly benefiting E. Cypress; residents will get some benefit, but as it continues, it will get some lessened benefits. Mr. Rohani mentioned there will be a full environmental review and any issues of noise and traffic will be mitigated like on all projects.

Dr. Fuller commented that he is not faulting the City for it as he supports it but don’t say they are doing lots for the area east of Main because they built the Laurel to Sellers extension. Mr. Rohani responded that he doesn’t think he said it that way, but okay. Dr. Fuller commented that the Library is embarrassing; if seniors have to park across the street to get to the Library, it doesn’t seem to meet ADA requirements and they will stumble to get across and back as it is a distance from the parking lot. He mentioned that the Friends of the Oakley Library attempted to get the Library, and people on the City Council tried to convince voters to get a tax on the ballot, and while the City is footing a big bill on development of other projects; i.e., parking lot, train center, Recreation Center and Community Park, it is sending the Friends to fundraise. He mentioned that the Library doesn’t have ample space for Veterans and seniors which is an embarrassment and his biggest fear with the next election is that the people do not want new taxes; the eastern part of the City is paying enough taxes, and he is worried the City is getting it ready and it will go out to vote again and then will say they tried their best but now have to put a bond up. He mentioned they never had the project adequately funded. Mr. McMurray commented that $7.5 million is allocated with the upcoming budget, there is a lot of leg work happening, there has been discussion with the Oakley Seniors many times and they have been well aware of it and the comments provided this evening don’t characterize their discussions completely. Regarding parking, he mentioned that across the street parking will happen in instances as the demand for the Library increases and they are trying to plan for community spaces. Regarding the Library/Community Center, they are not calling it a space for any specific group; if they do that, it closes off potential funding sources. He mentioned it is premature to talk about what services will be in the building until they know how much money they will have and that then, they will dig in and define space. He mentioned they have been open with the seniors, when it happens, he sees the City taking over senior center programming. He added that they are not ignoring the seniors, it is a shift in how things are done, and he believes the Library will be constructed, he just doesn’t know how big it will be or how big the community center space will be. Dr. Fuller commented that they need to overcome the history and having to fundraise is still a tax; it is a tax on their time, effort, household income for what they donate, and it is a tax on others who will pay a disproportionate share to have a Library; they need to rally behind the Library and get it going. He added that if it were built where it should have been, the Downtown would be bustling; he is not so sure that the train center is going to make the Downtown bustling. Dr. Fuller provided examples of challenges people with disabilities face every day, including Stephen Hawkins, himself, and the 8-year-old girl who crawled with others on the Capitol steps, because the Capitol did not have elevators, to get the ADA signed into law. He mentioned that he gets disappointed when it is set aside because if someone is disabled, they go through it on daily basis, i.e., microaggressions, jokes,

we'll get around to it, etc. He mentioned they are worth it, he is a whole person and functions quite well, and he requests accommodations to be upheld. He mentioned the Council has never had a chance to say no to improvements at Creekside Park because it hasn’t come to the dais; there was nothing east of Main and south of E. Cypress last year except resurfacing and this year nothing except the Laurel Road widening that will benefit the community. He mentioned they are ignoring the southeast part of town, there are needs to get done and they are taking things away. He commented that the City has a 30% reserve set by the Council but are only required to have 20%; he doesn’t see anything wrong to dip into reserves and build 2 signals and couple of other projects. Mr. Rohani commented that the Library/Community Center is in infancy stages and the parking lot behind it will have ADA spaces. He responded to Dr. Fuller’s comments regarding the lack of improvements east of Main Street. He mentioned the resurfacing project was last year. He also mentioned that there have been other projects in the past 5 years: Laurel from Main to Creekside got an overlay, the subdivision west of Creekside Way was resurfaced, traffic calming measures have been put in in that neighborhood, Creekside Park will have an item later in the summer that staff will bring to the Council, and Creekside Park has the best BBQ stand near the reserved shade structures. He shared that staff does not look at socio economic data on any projects in town, they look at the totality of streets, minor or major resurfacing, and allocate funding accordingly. He mentioned the year prior that they resurfaced Summer Lake. He added that none are because they are not paying attention to it, they look at the impact to the community and deploy resources of staff and funding, what brings the best value and fulfills needs. He mentioned the right-of-way acquisition on E. Cypress takes a lot of time and they have had to reposition staffing to focus on that as the project as it involves CCWD, utilities, and lots of complexity, but all projects get attention. Dr. Fuller commented that he knows Mr. Rohani applies himself as shown with the playground in Civic Center Park; it is in constant use and a great addition, and he understands funding. He requested the park remain untouched with the proposed Library/Community Center. Councilmember Meadows commented that he is okay with everything and understands priorities. He mentioned he believes Vice Mayor Shaw and Councilmember Henderson agrees with these priorities. He mentioned if they are speaking district-specific, District 1 only has CIP 274 with zero budget, but he understands the priorities across the city. He shared that E. Cypress Road has been the priority of the Council since day one; they are putting a huge effort and a huge amount of money into improving E. Cypress and the Laurel Road extension also benefits everyone out there. Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned that if there are no further comments, the Planning Commission can take a vote on the resolution. Chair Chuiko inquired if the resolution approving the CIP Program is in accordance and not in conflict with the General Plan. Vice Mayor Shaw read the agenda item.

Chair Chuiko inquired if there is any opportunity to discuss additional projects. Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned this is it. Commissioner Ramirez mentioned he appreciated Dr. Fuller’s comments and public comments. He mentioned with all this change, it is not smooth to say change is constant; this is a place for families and part of our families are seniors. He mentioned 304/314 and he is shocked at the ADA limit of $50k, but he has full confidence in our City in building ADA and seniors places so he is in favor of moving to approve. He added that he loves the Civic Center Park, but the brown wall can use color and asked all to consider more opportunity for public art as it can provide an inclusive place for all where they can create and imagine beautiful democracy. It was moved by Commissioner Ramirez and seconded by Commissioner Krieg to adopt the resolution. AYES: Chuiko, Krieg, Ramirez, Verduzco. ABSENT: Price. (4-0) Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned she requested the joint meeting and thanked the Councilmembers and Commissioners for their time in attending and for their collaboration. 5) ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:34 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Libby Vreonis City Clerk

Showing the first 24,000 of 55,464 characters. The full document is at the source.

AGENDA SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 21, 2024 4:00 PM Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561 MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people. VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard. Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road. Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us. A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000. The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing info@ci.oakley.ca.us. If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000. Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video. Information Regarding Public Comment 1

Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/. 1.CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items. 4.WORK SESSION 4.1 Adopt a Resolution Finding that the Proposed 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Oakley as required by sections 65401 and 65402 of the Government Code. (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program 3. PowerPoint Presentation 5.ADJOURN 2

STAFF REPORT City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us DATE: May 21, 2024 TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager FROM: Kevin Rohani, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Finding that the Proposed 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Oakley as required by sections 65401 and 65402 of the Government Code. Background and Analysis As required by Section 65401 and 65402 of the California Government Code, the report before you this evening is to determine whether the projects included in the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are consistent with the current City of Oakley General Plan. While the attached CIP packet outlines proposed expenditures, they are provided for planning purposes only and action this evening does not approve any funding to any project. Any final approval of projects and funding listed in the CIP will be brought before the Oakley City Council on June 11, 2024 as part of the Budget Adoption. This evening’s joint meeting is meant to receive a presentation from staff on the CIP, ask questions of staff and allow discussion from both the Oakley City Council and Oakley Planning Commission. At the end of the discussion, the Oakley Planning Commission will also need to take formal action to adopt a resolution finding the proposed CIP consistent with the current Oakley General Plan. Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+ This agenda item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ goal for the City of Oakley to leverage its financial resources for the long-term benefit of our residents and businesses while maintaining sufficient reserves to provide stability and ensure a successful future. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Oakley Planning Commission adopt a resolution finding the Proposed 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Oakley as required by sections 65401 and 65402 of the Government Code. Approved and Forwarded to the Planning Commission 3

STAFF REPORT 2CITY HALL | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US Attachments 1. Resolution 2. 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program 3. PowerPoint Presentation 4

Resolution No. XX-24 Page 1 of 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. XX-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY APPROVING A RESOLUTION OF FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED 2024/25 – 2028/29 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 65401 AND 65402 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE WHEREAS, Section 65401 of the Government Code requires the Planning Commission of cities and counties to review any proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in its jurisdiction for conformance with the agency’s adopted general plan and specific plans, and WHEREAS, Section 65402 of the Government Code requires the Planning Commission of cities and counties to review any proposed acquisition or disposition of real property for conformity with the agency’s adopted General Plan, and WHEREAS, the projects proposed reflect the major needs for roadways and other community facilities during the next five years in concert with anticipated growth areas as noted, and WHEREAS, a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not include government fiscal activities like the Budget or Capital Improvement Program, as each project in the CIP will be reviewed for compliance with CEQA before the project is undertaken and a determination made, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Oakley finds that the proposed 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the adopted General Plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Oakley this 21 st day of May 2024 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSTENTION: ABSENT: APPROVED: ___________________ Oleksii Chuiko, Chair ATTEST: ____________________ ________ Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date 5

PROPOSED ANNUAL CAPITAL BUDGET AND 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM For Fiscal Years 2024/25 to 2028/29 6

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a major public infrastructure and planning tool for the City of Oakley. The CIP serves as a statement of the City's policies and financial abilities to manage the development of the community. The creation of a five- year CIP provides a systematic plan for providing infrastructure improvements within a prioritized framework and a general schedule for projects to proceed. The Projects identified in the CIP meet the City’s General Plan and adhere to the Strategic Plan 27+. The first year reflects the adopted budget for the upcoming Fiscal Year (FY). The remaining four years represent a schedule and estimate of future capital needs that may be funded, given projected revenues and priorities. There are several benefits for developing and adopting a Capital Improvement Program. Not only does the CIP become a management tool for the City Council and City staff; a CIP also provides valuable information to the citizens, developers, and businesses who are interested in the development of the community. The CIP document will assist in leveraging available resources through the timing of projects, and the coordination of City projects with improvements constructed by other entities. Despite the many benefits of a CIP, it is important to highlight the fact that this is a planning document. Changes can occur for many reasons. Revenues can fluctuate because of changing economic conditions or shifts in City policy. Private economic decisions can also affect the timing, scale, and location of capital projects. The City of Oakley’s CIP reflects the Strategic Goals of the City Council and is a critical investment tool for the community to help promote the economic vitality and viability for the City of Oakley. The focus of the proposed CIP for FY 2024/25 through FY 2028/29 is to maintain the core infrastructure of the City of Oakley by utilizing the most cost effective and creative approach. The CIP continues to prioritize and build new infrastructure for the community, which will enhance the quality of life for residents. In preparation of the CIP for FY 2024/25, a comprehensive review of prospective projects was performed. 7

The CIP for FY 2024/25 is divided into specific projects to address unique needs for each component of the City’s infrastructure system (e.g., Streets, Parks & Facilities). This approach provides funding for infrastructure maintenance, construction of new improvements, and the long-range goals for protecting the quality of the public infrastructure system in the City of Oakley. The funding for CIP projects is generally from the following sources: Measure J Sales Tax, Gas Tax, Development Traffic Impact Fees, Development Park Impact Fees, Federal & State Grants, Assessment District Funds, and the City’s General Fund. The revenues from Development Traffic Impact Fees and Development Park Impact Fees are dependent upon the private development activity and regional economic growth. The CIP for FY 2024/25 conservatively budgets a portion of these funding sources to account for unforeseen downturns in the regional economic and development activity. There is a direct relationship between CIP project construction, economic development, and the vitality of the community. New residents want to come and live in a community that is vibrant and provides a wide range of amenities (e.g., Recreation Center, Library, etc.). Commercial developers also look to build in communities that thrive and provide amenities for today’s lifestyle. The construction of CIP projects helps to enhance amenities and the quality of life for the community residents, which in turn makes Oakley a desired community for private development. The increase in the level of private development activity will provide opportunities for the City to undertake projects with various infrastructure improvements to complement the private development projects. 8

Proposed CIP Projects for FY 2024/25 Project #176, Oakley Regional Park Project – This project transforms a 55-acre site located at the north end of Sellers Avenue that was given to the City as part of the development agreements with the Emerson and Gilbert Ranch projects. This 55-acre site was the site of an abandoned dairy farm that has been closed for decades. This project will construct a regional park at this site that will be a destination point for the Oakley community. A team of staff, consultants, and a Council sub-committee began the process of concept planning for this site in 2016. As a result of this work, a concept plan was developed and approved by the City Council. During 2019, there were further discussions with the community to solicit input as the concept plan was refined and adopted by the City Council to reflect the needs of the community and strategic goals of the City Council. This project will be a multi-phase project that will be designed and constructed over the coming years and would potentially cost over $60,000,000 to construct all its components. Funding for this project will be provided by a combination of grants and other funds over several years or decades. The first phase of this project was t he demolition and removal of the abandoned and unsafe structures, which was completed in 2019. The City applied for two rounds of funding for this project from the State Proposition 68 State of California Grant in 2019 and 2021 and unfortunately was not awarded the grant. Staff will continue to explore other grant funding for this project to design and construct this project. During FY 2023/24 a new Master Planning study was performed to solicit input from the community and various stakeholders on the features that are desired at this park and to ensure consistency with the new Oakley Strategic Plan 27+. This new master Plan was adopted by City Council in Spring 2024 and will be used in future grant funding applications. The funding of the preliminary project design and site clean-up was allocated in FY 2016/17 and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2024/25 budget. Project #186, West Cypress Road Bridge at Contra Costa Canal Reconstruction Project - The existing West Cypress Road Bridge that crosses the Contra Costa Canal is structurally deficient according to the Caltrans inspections. It will need to be reconstructed to bring it to modern structural standards. The City of Oakley does not have a designated funding source for replacing the City’s bridges and relies upon State grant programs such as Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (HBRR) for major bridge improvement projects. Staff will apply for this grant once the application cycles are presented. The funding of the preliminary project design was allocated in FY 2016/17 and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2024/25 budget. 9

Project #189, Piper Lane Drainage Channel Trash Capture Device Project - The Piper Lane drainage channel is one of the major drainage outfalls from the City of Oakley to the Delta in which the City is responsible for its maintenance and operation. This is an open channel that flows freely to the Delta and based on the permit issued by San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB), it cannot convey trash to the open waters of the Delta. Historically, a large amount of trash and debris were transported to the Delta through this channel. This project will construct a new trash capture device at the upstream end of the channel near Vintage Parkway. The trash capture device will stop trash from flowing into the Delta and, as a result, puts the City in compliance with the SFRWQCB permit. The design of this project is completed, and staff will look for grant funding for the construction of this project. The initial funding of this project was allocated in FY 2022/23 and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2024/25 budget. Project #211, Main Street/Rose Avenue Intersection Improvement Project – With the continued growth of the community and new subdivision development projects along the East Cypress Road corridor, the associated traffic volumes will increase. Improving the streets and traffic signals will be necessary to accommodate the added volume of traffic to these new neighborhoods. Main Street and Rose Avenue have operated as a stop sign controlled intersection, which is not sustainable for the long term, and therefore a traffic signal is needed at this location. City staff have been discussing this intersection improvement project with the management staff of Ironhouse Sanitary District (ISD) to explore opportunities that this project could address. The City needs better traffic flows at this intersection and ISD needs a second access point from their prospective development site to Main Street. Currently, the Vintage Parkway neighborhood has only one access to Main Street. Installing a signal at Main Street/Rose Avenue would benefit the neighborhood by providing a long desired secondary access for the residents. Having secondary access would not only alleviate congestion at the current intersection but would provide another option for emergency vehicles to access the neighborhood and allow quicker response times. The design of this project would start after a cost share agreement is reached between the City of Oakley and ISD. The funding for this project will be allocated in the CIP budget in futures years, after an agreement with ISD is finalized. 10

Project #231, Sellers Avenue (Riverrock Drive to CCWD Canal Crossing) Widening and Improvement Project – Sellers Avenue is a 2-lane road that was constructed by Contra Costa County decades ago. The section of Sellers Avenue from East Cypress Road, to the north end of the road at the gate to the future Oakley Regional Park is destined to be widened to 4 lanes with curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaped medians, bike lanes, and street lighting. Presently, the section of Sellers Avenue from East Cypress Road to Riverrock Drive has been widened and improved by the developers of the Emerson and Gilbert Ranch projects. This project will widen and improve the remaining section of Sellers Avenue from the intersection at Riverrock Drive to the gate of the future Oakley Regional Park. The above referenced developers paid the City the cost for curb and gutter, sidewalk, and one lane of roadway. The City will pay the remaining construction costs for the second lane and medians for this project. The timing of design and construction of this project will be in coordination with the Oakley Regional Park Project CIP # 176, when that project funding is secured. The funding for this project will be allocated in the CIP budget in future years. Project #247, East Cypress Road Widening (Knightsen Avenue to Contra Costa Water District Canal) Project - This project will widen and fully reconstruct East Cypress Road from Knightsen Avenue to Conta Costa Water District Canal. East Cypress Road is the only major roadway that carries traffic from far east Oakley, Bethel Island, and parts of the County to Main Street and beyond. The growth and development of the far east County region has necessitated various infrastructure improvements to East Cypress Road to accommodate the traffic demand on this roadway, which has been a health and safety concern for many years. This City capital project will reconstruct East Cypress Road from Knightsen Avenue to Contra Costa Water District Canal to 6 lanes, along with new curb, gutter, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, traffic signals, storm drain system and medians. The construction of this project is anticipated to start in spring 2024 and be completed by summer 2025. The funding for this project was allocated in FY 2021/22 budget and FY 2022/23 budget, and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2024/25 budget. Project #252, Downtown Storm Drain (AREA 29D) Improvement Project – Decades ago the Contra Costa County Flood Control District established drainage zones throughout the County for storm drain detention and treatment. These zones included large detention basins (e.g., Freedom Basin, Teakwood Basin, Del Antico Basin, etc.) and a network of underground pipe systems to convey the storm water runoff from the City streets to these basins. There are 9 drainage zones in the City of Oakley. Storm Drain Zone 29D covers all of the Gardenia Ave and Chianti Way neighborhood streets and conveys their storm drain runoff north toward Main Street and continues northerly under the railroad tracks. All 11

parts of the storm drain system in this zone have been constructed, except for the section of pipe from the north side of Main Street just east of Miguel Drive, to the edge of the railroad tracks. This project will construct this section of storm drainpipe and its associated infrastructure, which will complete all the improvements in this zone. The design of this project is completed, and the construction will begin once funding is secured in future years. The initial funding for the project design was allocated in the FY 2021/22 budget; and construction of this project will be funded in future years. Project #263, O'Hara Avenue / Carpenter Road Intersection Improvement Project – The construction of Carpenter Road from Rose Avenue to Cinnamon Ridge Drive as part of a private subdivision development project has opened this important east/west roadway corridor for the community. This section of Carpenter Road will increase traffic flows at the intersection of O’Hara Avenue and Carpenter Road. This project will improve the traffic operations at this intersection by constructing protected left turn lanes on Carpenter Road on both the westbound and eastbound approaches to O’Hara Avenue. Additional improvements include the installation of a video detection system and reconfiguration of the striping at this intersection. The design and right-of-way acquisition process for this project is currently underway and final design and construction will be funded in future years. The initial funding for this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 and FY 2022/23 budget, and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2024/25 budget. Project #265, Irrigation Well Installation at the City’s Freedom Basin Project – This project will install a new irrigation well next to the City owned storm drain basin, more commonly known as Freedom basin. This new well will provide the City with an independent, stable, and continuous source of water to irrigate the large field that is used by an assortment of leagues for sporting activities. The existing well used to irrigate the field is owned and operated by the High School District, and due to its continuous breakdowns, this well is not a reliable source to provide the massive amount of irrigation water needed for this field. The construction of this project is currently underway, and staff are working with PG&E to provide electricity to the well site. It is anticipated that the construction of this project will be completed by fall 2024. The initial funding of this project was allocated in the FY 2021/22 and FY 2022/23 budget, and no additional funding is requested in the FY 2024/25 budget. Project #268, Main Street / Delta Road Intersection Signalization Project – This project will install a traffic signal and improve the Main Street / Delta Road intersection. This intersection is identified to have a traffic signal per the City’s 12

Traffic Impact Fee program. With the increase in traffi

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
BudgetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • May 21, 2024 - 03:57 PM — Minutes
  • May 21, 2024 - 03:57 PM

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: dfa141d98c0beb6d5c4ef3bb13c60c7a. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record