POLISCOPE

The public record

ROSEVILLE (SACRAMENTO COUNTY)Decisions publishedPartial coverage

Design Committee (2025-06-19)

Thursday, June 19, 2025 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Design Committee (2025-06-19)

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record - an action agenda or minutes - is published for this meeting.

Record text

No recording or transcript is held for this meeting.

Approved July 17, 2025 Page 1 Clifford Haggenjos, Jr., Chair Sandra Boyle, Committee Member Rex Clark, Committee Member Lupe Nelson, Secretary Greg Bitter, Liaison APPROVED MINUTES Design Committee Meeting June 19, 2025 4:30 PM City Council Chambers 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Haggenjos called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. II. ROLL CALL SILENT Present: Clark, Haggenjos Absent: Boyle III. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of September 19, 2024 Motion by Committee Member Clark, seconded by Chair Haggenjos, to approve the Consent Calendar. The Motion passed unanimously with a voice vote. IV. REQUESTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. North Industrial Plan Area Parcel 44 - Foothills Commerce Center Phase III, 1100 Winding Creek Road, File # PL24-0982 REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Design Review Permit and Lot Line Adjustment. The project includes development of approximately 360,000-square-feet of light industrial buildings, as envisioned in the 2000 Foothills Business Park Annexation EIR. Four (4) buildings would be constructed, with a 50-foot maximum height allowed and floor areas ranging in size from approximately 59,000-square-feet to approximately 152,000-square-feet, as well as landscaping, circulation improvements, parking, and utility extensions. The request also includes a Lot Line Adjustment to accommodate each building on its own parcel. Associate Planner, Escarlet Mar, presented the staff report.

Approved July 17, 2025 Page 2 Chair Haggenjos opened the Public Hearing and invited comments from the applicant and/or the audience. Applicant representative, Tanner Wilson, stated he had received a copy of the staff report and was in agreement with staff’s recommendation. Chair Haggenjos opened the public comment. Hearing none, Chair Haggenjos closed the public comment and Public Hearing. Motion by Committee Member Clark, seconded by Chair Haggenjos to: 1. Consider an Addendum to the Foothills Business Park Annexation Project EIR; 2. Adopt the four (4) findings of fact and approve the Design Review Permit subject to seventy- one (71) conditions of approval; and 3. Approve the Lot Line Adjustment subject to thirteen (13) conditions of approval. The Motion passed with a voice vote. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chair Haggenjos opened the Public Comment period. • Development Services Director, Mike Isom, recognized and thanked Committee Member Clark for his years of service to the residents of the City of Roseville. • Chair Haggenjos also thanked Committee Member Clark for his dedication to the City of Roseville and years of public service. Chair Haggenjos closed the Public Comment period. VI. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Committee Member Clark, seconded by Committee Member Poulsen, to adjourn the meeting. The Motion passed unanimously at 4:46 p.m. with a voice vote.

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
AgendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
BudgetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Design Committee (2025-06-19)

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • A transcript is not available.
  • No audio or video recording is linked.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: de8472b9f306ed7473efb14158d5bbbc. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record