CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING

DUNEDIN, FLORIDA MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 8, 2024 PRESENT City Commission: Absent: Also Present: CALL TO ORDER CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE 6:00 P.M. Vice Mayor Maureen "Moe " Freaney , Commissioners John Tornga and Robert Walker Mayor Julie Ward Bujalsk i, Comm issioner Jeff Gow Deputy City Manager Jorge Quintas , City Attorney Jenn ifer Cowan , Deputy City Clerk Michelle Wells , Community Development Director George Kinney , Code Compliance Supervisor Jul ie Ph illips and eight people in the audience . Vice Mayor Freaney called the August 8, 2024 , Regular Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. INVOCATION AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City Attorney Cowan gave the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Vice Mayor Freaney explained Mayor Bujalski and Commissioner Gow were in Scotland along with many people from Dunedin. She asked for a motion to excuse their absence. MOTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Walker and seconded by Comm iss ioner Tornga to excuse the absences of Mayor Bujalski and Commissioner Gow . VOTE: Motion carried unanimously . 1. PRESENTATIONS- None . CITIZEN INPUT Vice Mayor Freaney adv ised now was the time for anyone in the audience who wished to speak on a topic that is not already on the agenda . Seeing and hearing no one wishing to speak , she moved to the next agenda item . 2. ACTION ITEMS 2.a. Second Reading of Ordinance 24-14 amending section 105-27.1.1.1 (Site Standards for Houses and Duplexes) of the City of Dunedin Land Development Code to prohibit vehicles that exceed 22 feet in length or 8 feet in width from parking on a residential street or right-of-way unless loading or unloading. City Attorney Cowan read Ordinance 24-14 by title only. MOTION: Mot ion was made by Commissioner Tornga and seconded by Commissioner Walker to adopt Ordinance 24-14 on second reading . Staff Presentation Commun ity Development Director Kinney had nothing to add from the first reading. Questions for Staff - None Public Input Vice Mayor Freaney opened the item to public input. Hearing and seeing no one wis hi ng to speak , Vice Mayor Freaney closed the public input. 24-1

Regular Meeting Notes August 8, 2024 Commission Comments Dunedin City Commission Vice Mayor Freaney and Commissioners Tomga and Walker noted their support for the ordinance. VOTE: Motion carried with Commissioners Walker , Tornga , and Vice Mayor Freaney voting aye. Voting nay: None. 2.b. Application DR 24-02 - Second Hearing of Design Review Approval for the development of a multifamily residential project on the property located at 534 Howell Street Vice Mayor Freaney adv ised this is a quasi-judicial hearing and asked the Commission to disclose any ex-parte communication for the record regarding the Design application before them ; hearing none , the item presentation continued. City Attorney Cowan advised: This is a quasi-judicial hearing and in accordance with rules put forth by the Commission, there will be an opportunity where staff will provide a presentation and the Commission will have the opportun ity to ask questions. The applicant will then be given an opportunity to provide a presentation and can be questioned by the Commission. If the applicant has any questions of the staff or staff has any of the applicant, they can direct that at the City Commission and they will make sure those questions are responded to . This is a quasi-judicial hearing so there is sworn testimony , and with that the City Clerk can swear in those wishing to testify today. Deputy City Clerk Wells swore in those wishing to speak to the item , including City staff and members of the public in attendance. Staff Presentation Community Development Director Kinney shared the staff report and referenced the various exhibits , maps, and aerial views to orient the Commission and the public to the location. Application Information APPLICATION NO.: REQUEST: PROJECT NAME: OWNER/APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE : Property Information STREET ADDRESS: TAX PARCEL NO. : AREA : FLOOD ZONE: LAND USE PLAN : ZONING DISTRICT : EXISTING USES: Public Hearing Dates DR 24--02 Design Review Approva l Sunrise Townhomes Maryla B. Hawekotte Greg Presby , TranSystems 534 Howell Street , Dunedin , FL 34698 27-28-15-51588-000--0100 1.122 Acres (48 ,874 SF) ZoneX Residential Medium (RM) Multifamily Residential (MF-15) Residential & Assisted Living Facility On June 12 , 2024, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) recommended unanimous approval. On July 11 , 2024, the City Commission approved on the first reading. On August 8, 2024 , the City Commission may approve on second reading . 24-2

Regular Meeting Notes August 8, 2024 Project Description Dunedin City Commission Ms. Hawekotte , the owner/applicant , is requesting Design Review approval to build a mult ifam ily residential development on the property . The project will consist of one (1) new two-story building containing eight (8) townhomes fronting a 5-foot concrete walkway and a 24-foot asphalt cartway . In addition , the property will be subdivided into two parcels. The two-family residence located to the west will be removed along with a small structure ; the assisted living facility and single-family residence will remain. Property History Presently , the property is developed and consists of a single story 6,658 square foot , 50-bed assisted living facility built in 1988 (534 Howell St.) , a one-story duplex (1161 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave.) , and a one-story single-family residence (532 Howell St.) , both of which were built in 1960. To make way for the new townhomes , the existing duplex will be demolished but the ALF and single-family residence will remain . Land Use Plan Evaluation The Land Use Plan is Residential Medium (RM) , which is a permitted use. There are a number of density and intensity requirements for the property. The table identifies the three uses. They will reduce the number of beds from fifty to twenty-one if the project moves forward; that is a condition of approval. PROPOSE'O USE DENSITY/ INTENSITY PROPOSED ACRES Residential: Townhomes 15 du/a 8 dwelling units 0.53 Residential Equivalent : ALF 3 beds per du/a 21 beds 0.47 Residential : Single-family 15 du/a 1 residence 0.07 TO •TAL 1.07 Zoning District Evaluation The dimensions being provided are to the new parcel being created to support the townhomes . This is not the property as a whole . STANDARD PERMITTE:D PROPOS D CONFORMS Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq . ft . 25 ,531 sq . ft. Yes Lot Width 70 ft. 83 ft . Yes Lot Depth 100ft . 307 ft. Yes Number of Stories 5 stories max . 2 stories Yes Building Height 50ft . max . 24.35 ft. Yes Front Setback 25 ft. min. 25 ft. Yes Side Setback 10ft. min. 10 ft. (N), 29.9 ft. (S) Yes Rear Setback 20ft . min. 2.3.7 ft. Yes Compatibility Evaluation City staff did an extensive compatibility analysis ; the information is provided in the backup materials of all the surrounding area as far as what is on the ground today and what could be built , provided an aerial identifying all the uses by height, use , density , or floor area ratio and determined this project was cons istent and compatible with Objective 2.9 of the Comprehensive Plan ; therefore , they would agree this is a compatible project as proposed. 24-3 I I i

Regular Meeting Notes August 8, 2024 Surrounding Zoning & Uses ZONJ G DISTRICT NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST Neighborhood Business ( NB ), Multifamily Residential {MF-15) Planned Res idential Development (P RO ) Municipal Public Lands (MPL) Planned Res identia l Development (PRO ) Design Standards Dunedin City Commission ExlsT!NG USES Day Care , Multifamily Residential Multifamily Res idential Was tewater Treatment Facility Multifami ly Res idential The staff report provided details of each of the elements. All have been reviewed by staff examining the documents with Common Open Space; Parking , Buffering, Fences and Walls; Architectural Style; Sustainability ; and the other elements as listed . Traffic Impact Analysis - This project would generate nine peak hour trips both a.m. and p.m. Committee Actions DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) The DRC reviewed this project on December 13, 2023. All of the DRC comments and items have been addressed or are addressed in the conditions of approval recommended below. The notes of the December 13 , 2023 , DRC meeting are included as EXHIBIT K. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ARC) A formal review of this application took place on April 2, 2024 , where the ARC approved the design of the project with comments about the landscaping and tree preservation plans, which were addressed prior to going to the Local Planning Agency. The ARC meeting minutes are included as EXHIBIT L. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY The LPA reviewed the application on June 12, 2024 , and unanimously recommended approval to the Commission . Staff Determination Staff finds that Application DR 24-02 for Design Review is consistent with the applicable review criteria for approval subject to the following standard conditions : 1. The applicant/developer is responsible for meeting the minimum criteria of the Land Development Code and for acquiring all other jurisdictional permits and approvals. 2. Construction plans shall be consistent with the approved Design Review plans and drawings. 3. Design Review approval shall expire in twelve (12) months from the date of City Commission Design Review approval unless the applicant obtains infrastructure review approval and vertical building permits. Questions for Staff - None Applicant Presentation Greg Presby with TranSystems commented he had nothing further without restating what has already been presented and offered to answer any other questions. Questions for the Applicant - None 24-4

Regular Meeting Notes August 8, 2024 Public Input Dunedin City Commission Vice Mayor Freaney opened the item to public input. Hearing and seeing no one wish in g to speak , Vice Mayor Freaney closed the public input. MOTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Tornga and seconded by Comm iss ioner Walker to approve Application DR 24-02 Design Review Approval on second hearing. Commiss ion Comments Commissioner Tomga commented that it will be a nice project. Commissioner Walker commented the design presented would be a nice addition to the area . Vice Mayor Freaney noted she watched the first hearing and thought most of the questions were answered . She was glad the height was kept down and that it will be a nice project. VOTE: Motion carried with Commissioners Walker , Tornga , and Vice Mayor Freaney voting aye. Voting nay : None. 2.c. The proposed agenda for the September 5, 2024, Commission Meeting Vice Mayor Freaney noted the following addition to the proposed agenda ; there were no other changes. Addition Presentations: Recognition of Greater Dunedin Little League MOTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Walker and seconded by Commissioner Tornga to approve the proposed agenda for the September 5, 2024 , Commission Meeting. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 3. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Vice Mayor Freaney asked if anyone had anything to bring forward. ADJOURN MEETING The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. NOTE: The meeting was completely recorded and the recording is in the official file . Attest: Rebecca C. Schlichter City Clerk 24-5

1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DUNEDIN CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVE AUGUST 08, 2024 6:00 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. PRESENTATIONS CITIZEN INPUT 2. ACTION ITEMS 2.a. Second Reading of Ordinance 24-14 amending section 105-27.1.1.1 (Site Standards for Houses and Duplexes) of the City of Dunedin Land Development Code to prohibit vehicles that exceed 22 feet in length or 8 feet in width from parking on a residential street or right-of-way unless loading or unloading. Staff and the Local Planning Agency recommend approval by the City Commission. EXHIBIT: A. Ordinance 2024-14 EXHIBIT: B. Parking Standards EXHIBIT: C. Business Impact Statement 2.b. Application DR 24-02 - Second Hearing of Design Review Approval for the development of a multifamily residential project on the property located at 534 Howell Street. Staff has determined that the application meets all of the applicable review criteria for approval by the City Commission. EXHIBIT: A. Staff Report EXHIBIT: B. Design Review Application DR 24-02 EXHIBIT: C. Aerial, Land Use & Zoning Maps EXHIBIT: D. Aerial Maps of Surrounding Properties & Uses EXHIBIT: E. Civil Drawings

2 EXHIBIT: F. Greenspace Plan EXHIBIT: G. Architectural Drawings EXHIBIT: H. Sustainability Matrix EXHIBIT: I. PIF Application and PIF Calculation Sheet EXHIBIT: J. Traffic Impact Analysis EXHIBIT: K. 12/13/2023 DRC Meeting Notes EXHIBIT: L. 4/2/2024 ARC Meeting Minutes EXHIBIT: M. Public Notices EXHIBIT: N. 6/12/2024 LPA Meeting Draft Minutes EXHIBIT: O. 8/8/2024 Staff Presentation 2.c. The proposed agenda for the September 5, 2024, Commission Meeting. Staff recommends approving the proposed agenda for the September 5, 2024, Commission Meeting. EXHIBIT: A. Proposed Agenda September 5, 2024 Regular Meeting.pdf 3. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS ADJOURN MEETING DUNEDIN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & DECORUM RULES Note: Please put cell phones and pagers on silent or vibrate during the meeting. This meeting is televised; therefore, you may appear on TV at any time. Public Appearance: CITIZEN INPUT is for comments from members of the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda for this meeting (please give name and address and limit all comments to a maximum of three minutes). AS FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA individual speakers are limited to a maximum of three minutes. A Representative of a group consisting of 5 individuals who are present during the meeting may speak on behalf of the group for up to 10 minutes at the Chair’s discretion. To do so, the individuals must have waived their time to the representative by providing their name and address on the back of the comment card. Public Hearings: During public hearings the Chair will open the agenda item to the public for comment. If you wish to comment come to the microphone at the podium and give your name and address for the record. Make all comments and queries to or through the Chair. This meeting is for agenda items only. Other issues should be presented to the City Manager or City Clerk for discussion at a future Commission meeting. Appeals: Per Florida Statute 286.0105 - If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.

3 Disability Provisions: It is the policy of the City of Dunedin not to discriminate against disabled persons in employment or the provisions of services. If you have a disability that requires accommodation, please notify the ADA Coordinator 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting at (727) 298-3043. COPIES OF THIS AND ALL COMMISSION AGENDAS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE, ON THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE. COPIES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT WWW.DUNEDINGOV.COM.

>> VICE >> VICE MAYOR: >> I'LL >> I'LL GO >> I'LL GO TO >> I'LL GO TO YOU, >> I'LL GO TO YOU, THE >> I'LL GO TO YOU, THE MAKER >> I'LL GO TO YOU, THE MAKER OF >> I'LL GO TO YOU, THE MAKER OF THE >> I'LL GO TO YOU, THE MAKER OF THE MOTION. THE MAKER OF THE MOTION. >> I'M FULLY PLEASED WITH THE >> I'M FULLY PLEASED WITH THE >> I'M FULLY PLEASED WITH THE PRESENTATION >> I'M FULLY PLEASED WITH THE PRESENTATION AND >> I'M FULLY PLEASED WITH THE PRESENTATION AND DESIGN >> I'M FULLY PLEASED WITH THE PRESENTATION AND DESIGN REVIEWS. PRESENTATION AND DESIGN REVIEWS. VERY HAPPY WITH IT. VERY HAPPY WITH IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: COMMISSIONER >> COMMISSIONER >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? WALKER? >> I TOTALLY AGREE. >> I TOTALLY AGREE. >> I TOTALLY AGREE. WE >> I TOTALLY AGREE. WE HAVE >> I TOTALLY AGREE. WE HAVE PEOPLE >> I TOTALLY AGREE. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT >> I TOTALLY AGREE. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT FOLLOWED >> I TOTALLY AGREE. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT FOLLOWED THE WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT FOLLOWED THE LETTER OF THE LAW OF THIS LETTER OF THE LAW OF THIS ORDINANCE BY BUILDING FENCES ORDINANCE BY BUILDING FENCES AROUND THEIR SUVs IN THEIR AROUND THEIR SUVs IN THEIR BACKYARD AND THAT SORT OF THING. BACKYARD AND THAT SORT OF THING. I FULLY SUPPORT THIS. I FULLY SUPPORT THIS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: YES, I AM MOVING >> YES, I AM MOVING >> YES, I AM MOVING A >> YES, I AM MOVING A LITTLE >> YES, I AM MOVING A LITTLE FASTER. A LITTLE FASTER. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC INPUT IN THE IS THERE ANY PUBLIC INPUT IN THE AUDIENCE ON THIS ITEM. AUDIENCE ON THIS ITEM. GEORGE, SINCE I'M GOING GEORGE, SINCE I'M GOING BACKWARDS, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU BACKWARDS, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ON THIS. WANT TO SAY ON THIS. >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> VICE >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> VICE MAYOR: >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> VICE MAYOR: THIS >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> VICE MAYOR: THIS SEEMS >> THIS IS GREAT, VICE MAYOR. >> VICE MAYOR: THIS SEEMS SO >> THIS SEEMS SO >> THIS SEEMS SO SIMPLE, >> THIS SEEMS SO SIMPLE, I'M >> THIS SEEMS SO SIMPLE, I'M COMPLICATING >> THIS SEEMS SO SIMPLE, I'M COMPLICATING IT. SIMPLE, I'M COMPLICATING IT. ALL IN FAVOR? ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> VICE >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: DID >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: DID THAT >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: DID THAT NEED >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: DID THAT NEED TO >> DID THAT NEED TO >> DID THAT NEED TO BE >> DID THAT NEED TO BE A >> DID THAT NEED TO BE A ROLL >> DID THAT NEED TO BE A ROLL CALL >> DID THAT NEED TO BE A ROLL CALL VOTE. BE A ROLL CALL VOTE. >> YES. >> YES. >> YES. >> >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER >> YES. >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> VICE >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. AND >> AYE. AND THAT >> AYE. AND THAT PASSES >> AYE. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. AND THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. OKAY, WE'LL GO TO THE SECOND OKAY, WE'LL GO TO THE SECOND ITEM. ITEM. TRY NOT TO DO THIS ONE TRY NOT TO DO THIS ONE BACKWARDS. BACKWARDS. THIS IS FOR APPLICATION DR THIS IS FOR APPLICATION DR 24-02, SECOND HEARING OF DESIGN 24-02, SECOND HEARING OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON THE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 534 HOWELL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 534 HOWELL STREET. STREET. LET ME ASK FIRST, DOES ANYONE LET ME ASK FIRST, DOES ANYONE NEED TO DISCLOSE ANY EX PARTE NEED TO DISCLOSE ANY EX PARTE CONTACT FOR THE RECORD? CONTACT FOR THE RECORD? >> NO. >> NO. >> NO. >> >> NO. >> NO. >> NO. >> NO. >> >> NO. >> VICE >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL GO >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL GO TO >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL GO TO GEORGE >> I'LL GO TO GEORGE >> I'LL GO TO GEORGE FOR >> I'LL GO TO GEORGE FOR THE >> I'LL GO TO GEORGE FOR THE PRESENTATION. FOR THE PRESENTATION. >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I GIVE >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I GIVE AN >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I GIVE AN OVERVIEW >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I GIVE AN OVERVIEW AND >> ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU DO THAT, I GIVE AN OVERVIEW AND WE'LL I GIVE AN OVERVIEW AND WE'LL SWEAR ANY WITNESSES IN. SWEAR ANY WITNESSES IN. >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE AN >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO >> THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE THEIR PRESENTATION. THEIR PRESENTATION. AFTERWARDS, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE AFTERWARDS, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE ANY AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE ANY STATEMENTS. STATEMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS STAFF IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS STAFF FOR THE APPLICANT OR APPLICANT FOR THE APPLICANT OR APPLICANT HAS FOR STAFF, THE QUESTIONS MAY HAS FOR STAFF, THE QUESTIONS MAY BE ASKED AT THAT TIME. BE ASKED AT THAT TIME. AT THIS TIME, IF THE CLERK CAN AT THIS TIME, IF THE CLERK CAN SWEAR ANYONE IN WHO WILL GIVE SWEAR ANYONE IN WHO WILL GIVE TESTIMONY. TESTIMONY. [ SWEARING-IN ] [ SWEARING-IN ] >> VICE MAYOR: THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. SOY >> THANK YOU. SOY GUESS >> THANK YOU. SOY GUESS WE >> THANK YOU. SOY GUESS WE CAN >> THANK YOU. SOY GUESS WE CAN GO >> THANK YOU. SOY GUESS WE CAN GO TO >> THANK YOU. SOY GUESS WE CAN GO TO GEORGE. SOY GUESS WE CAN GO TO GEORGE. >> THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR, >> THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR, >> THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS, >> THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS, GEORGE >> THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS, GEORGE KINNEY, >> THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS, GEORGE KINNEY, ON COMMISSIONERS, GEORGE KINNEY, ON BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. I WANT TO WALK-THROUGH THE I WANT TO WALK-THROUGH THE PRESENTATION QUICKLY ONE MORE PRESENTATION QUICKLY ONE MORE TIME, IF IT LOADS ON THE SCREEN TIME, IF IT LOADS ON THE SCREEN HERE. HERE. I'M NOT SEEING IT ON THE I'M NOT SEEING IT ON THE MONITORS. MONITORS. THERE WE GO. THERE WE GO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. SO VERY QUICKLY, COMMISSIONERS, SO VERY QUICKLY, COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR DESIGN THIS IS A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, THE PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL, THE PROJECT NAME IS SUNRISE TOWNHOMES, THE NAME IS SUNRISE TOWNHOMES, THE REPRESENTATIVE IS GREG PRESBY REPRESENTATIVE IS GREG PRESBY FROM TRANSIT SYSTEMS. FROM TRANSIT SYSTEMS. THE OWNER AND APPLICANT ARE THE OWNER AND APPLICANT ARE BEHIND ME, I KNOW IF YOU HAVE BEHIND ME, I KNOW IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, THEY'LL BE HAPPY TO QUESTIONS, THEY'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. THE SITE AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE THE SITE AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE AERIAL, TO THE RIGHT IS LOCATED, AERIAL, TO THE RIGHT IS LOCATED, ACTUALLY, HAS TWO FRONTAGES TO ACTUALLY, HAS TWO FRONTAGES TO THE WEST OFF MARTIN LUTHER KING, THE WEST OFF MARTIN LUTHER KING, AND TO THE SOUTH OFF OF HOWELL AND TO THE SOUTH OFF OF HOWELL STREET, IT'S A T-SHAPED LOT, AND STREET, IT'S A T-SHAPED LOT, AND ELONGATED, AND THEN WITH THE ELONGATED, AND THEN WITH THE HOME KIND OF UP AGAINST HOWELL HOME KIND OF UP AGAINST HOWELL STREET. STREET. THE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 1.122 THE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 1.122 ACRES, IT'S A NONFLOOD ZONE ACRES, IT'S A NONFLOOD ZONE AREA. AREA. THE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL THE LAND USE IS RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM, THE ZONING DISTRICT IS MEDIUM, THE ZONING DISTRICT IS MF-15. MF-15. THE EXISTING USE IS RESIDENTIAL THE EXISTING USE IS RESIDENTIAL AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. PUBLIC HEARING DATES AS YOU CAN PUBLIC HEARING DATES AS YOU CAN SEE, THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SEE, THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY CONSIDERED THIS APPLICATION ON CONSIDERED THIS APPLICATION ON JUNE 12, 2024 AND RECOMMENDED JUNE 12, 2024 AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR FIRST READ ON JULY 11, 2024. FOR FIRST READ ON JULY 11, 2024. AND HERE WE ARE FOR SECOND READ AND HERE WE ARE FOR SECOND READ ON AUGUST 8th. ON AUGUST 8th. BY WAY OF DESCRIPTION, THE OWNER BY WAY OF DESCRIPTION, THE OWNER APPLICANT IS REQUESTS DESIGN APPLICANT IS REQUESTS DESIGN REVIEW FOR MULTIFAMILY REVIEW FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE PROPERTY, THE RESIDENTIAL ON THE PROPERTY, THE PROJECT WOULD CONSIST OF ONE NEW PROJECT WOULD CONSIST OF ONE NEW TWO STORY BUILDING CONTAINING TWO STORY BUILDING CONTAINING EIGHT TOWNHOMES. EIGHT TOWNHOMES. THEY WOULD BE FRONTING A FIVE THEY WOULD BE FRONTING A FIVE FOOT CONCRETE WALKWAY. FOOT CONCRETE WALKWAY. AND IT WOULD BE THE ACCESS TO AND IT WOULD BE THE ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED HOMES, YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED HOMES, YOU CAN SEE THOSE IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND THOSE IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER OF THE T. CORNER OF THE T. TO THE RIGHT IS THE EXISTING TO THE RIGHT IS THE EXISTING ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, AND INSIDE THE ARCH OF THE T IS INSIDE THE ARCH OF THE T IS WHERE THAT SINGLE FAMILY WHERE THAT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS POSITIONED. RESIDENTIAL IS POSITIONED. THIS KINDS OF SHOWS YOU THE THIS KINDS OF SHOWS YOU THE EXISTING SITE AND HOW IT'S EXISTING SITE AND HOW IT'S CURRENTLY DEVELOPED FOR THIS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT. PROJECT. YOU WILL SEE THAT THE TWO FAMILY YOU WILL SEE THAT THE TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE IS LOCATED TO THE WEST RESIDENCE IS LOCATED TO THE WEST THERE WOULD NEED TO BE REMOVED, THERE WOULD NEED TO BE REMOVED, ALONG WITH A SMALL STRUCTURE ALONG WITH A SMALL STRUCTURE KIND OF CENTER OF THE T, WOULD KIND OF CENTER OF THE T, WOULD ALSO BE REMOVED. ALSO BE REMOVED. THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY WILL REMAIN, AND THE SINGLE WILL REMAIN, AND THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS ALSO PROPOSED TO REMAIN. IS ALSO PROPOSED TO REMAIN. VERY QUICKLY, THE PROPERTY IS VERY QUICKLY, THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE STORY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE STORY 6658 SQUARE FOOT, 50 BED 6658 SQUARE FOOT, 50 BED ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BUILT ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BUILT IN 1988, A ONE STORY DUPLEX AND IN 1988, A ONE STORY DUPLEX AND ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE BOTH OF WHICH WERE RESIDENCE BOTH OF WHICH WERE BUILT IN 1960. BUILT IN 1960. TO MAKE WAY FOR THE NEW TO MAKE WAY FOR THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. DEVELOPMENT. I'LL GET INTO THIS IN THE LAND I'LL GET INTO THIS IN THE LAND USE PIECE OF IT, THE ASSISTED USE PIECE OF IT, THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY WILL HAVE TO LIVING FACILITY WILL HAVE TO REDUCE ITS BED COUNT FROM 50 TO REDUCE ITS BED COUNT FROM 50 TO 21. 21. FROM A LAND USE PLANNED FROM A LAND USE PLANNED PERSPECTIVE, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM PERSPECTIVE, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM IS THE LAND USE. IS THE LAND USE. YOU CAN SEE THE ANALYSIS THAT YOU CAN SEE THE ANALYSIS THAT WAS PERFORMED AS PART OF THE WAS PERFORMED AS PART OF THE REVIEW, THE TOTAL ACREAGE FOR REVIEW, THE TOTAL ACREAGE FOR THE SITE AT 1.12 IT ACRES. THE SITE AT 1.12 IT ACRES. THE TOTAL THAT WOULD BE USED FOR THE TOTAL THAT WOULD BE USED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IF APPROVED THIS DEVELOPMENT IF APPROVED WOULD BE 1.07 ACRES. WOULD BE 1.07 ACRES. FROM A ZONING DISTRICT FROM A ZONING DISTRICT STANDPOINT, THE PROPERTY IS STANDPOINT, THE PROPERTY IS ZONED MF-15, THIS PROJECT DOES ZONED MF-15, THIS PROJECT DOES MEET ALL THE DIMENSIONAL MEET ALL THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, AND I WOULD POINT OUT STANDARDS, AND I WOULD POINT OUT THE NUMBER OF STORIES IN THIS THE NUMBER OF STORIES IN THIS PARTICULAR DISTRICT DOES ALLOW PARTICULAR DISTRICT DOES ALLOW FOR A FIVE STORY PROPOSAL, THIS FOR A FIVE STORY PROPOSAL, THIS IS A TWO STORY PROPOSAL. IS A TWO STORY PROPOSAL. WE THINK THAT REALLY FITS FROM A WE THINK THAT REALLY FITS FROM A COMPATIBILITY PERSPECTIVE, WHICH COMPATIBILITY PERSPECTIVE, WHICH I'LL GET TO HERE ON THE NEXT I'LL GET TO HERE ON THE NEXT SLIDE. SLIDE. AS PART OF WHAT WE DO FOR EVERY AS PART OF WHAT WE DO FOR EVERY DESIGN REVIEW, WE DO A DESIGN REVIEW, WE DO A COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS. COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS. THIS PARTICULAR TWO STORY THIS PARTICULAR TWO STORY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPOSED DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY TOGETHER DENSITY ON THE PROPERTY TOGETHER WITH DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS ON WITH DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS ON VACANT LAND WOULD BE COMPATIBLE VACANT LAND WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING HEIGHTS IN THE WITH BUILDING HEIGHTS IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. AND IS CONSISTENT WITH 2.9 IN AND IS CONSISTENT WITH 2.9 IN OUR FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT IN OUR FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMMISSION IS FULLY AWARE OF THE COMMISSION IS FULLY AWARE OF THE CRITERIA THAT IT REQUIRED AS THE CRITERIA THAT IT REQUIRED AS PART OF THE DESIGN REVIEW PART OF THE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS, AND AS PART OF YOUR PROCESS, AND AS PART OF YOUR BACKUP, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE BACKUP, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS ADDRESSED ALL APPLICANT HAS ADDRESSED ALL THESE CRITERIA, TYPICALLY THE THESE CRITERIA, TYPICALLY THE ONES THAT MOST PEOPLE ARE ONES THAT MOST PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED WITH ARE THE TRAFFIC CONCERNED WITH ARE THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS. IMPACTS. IT IS PART OF YOUR BACKUP, THERE IT IS PART OF YOUR BACKUP, THERE WAS A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WAS A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DONE AS PART OF THIS. DONE AS PART OF THIS. THIS SITE WOULD ONLY GENERATE THIS SITE WOULD ONLY GENERATE NINE PEAK TRIPS BOTH A.M. AND NINE PEAK TRIPS BOTH A.M. AND P.M. P.M. COMMUNITY ACTIONS INCLUDED THE COMMUNITY ACTIONS INCLUDED THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE THAT MET DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE THAT MET IN DECEMBER OF 2023. IN DECEMBER OF 2023. THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MET AND CONSIDERED COMMITTEE MET AND CONSIDERED THIS APPLICATION ON APRIL 2 OF THIS APPLICATION ON APRIL 2 OF 2024. 2024. ALL OF THE SUGGESTIONS OF THE ALL OF THE SUGGESTIONS OF THE ARC WERE ADDRESSED AS PART OF ARC WERE ADDRESSED AS PART OF THE SUBMISSION THAT'S COME TO THE SUBMISSION THAT'S COME TO YOU ALL. YOU ALL. IT WAS TO THE LOCAL PLANNING IT WAS TO THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ON JUNE 12th, AND WITH A AGENCY ON JUNE 12th, AND WITH A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION TO THE UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION. CITY COMMISSION. FINALLY, STAFF DETERMINATION, FINALLY, STAFF DETERMINATION, STAFF FINDS THAT THE DESIGN STAFF FINDS THAT THE DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA HAVE BEEN MET REVIEW CRITERIA HAVE BEEN MET AND ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THOSE THREE SUBJECT TO THOSE THREE CONDITIONS WHICH ARE TYPICALLY CONDITIONS WHICH ARE TYPICALLY OUR STANDARD CONDITIONS. OUR STANDARD CONDITIONS. I'LL READ THOSE INTO THE RECORD I'LL READ THOSE INTO THE RECORD QUICKLY. QUICKLY. THE APPLICANT AND DEVELOPER IS THE APPLICANT AND DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING THE LAND RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REQUIRING DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REQUIRING ALL JURISDICTIONAL PERMITS AND ALL JURISDICTIONAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS. APPROVALS. THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHOULD BE THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN REVIEW PLANS AND DRAWINGS. REVIEW PLANS AND DRAWINGS. AND DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL SHALL AND DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL SHALL EXPIRE IN 12 MONTHS FROM THE EXPIRE IN 12 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE APPROVAL, UNLESS THE DATE OF THE APPROVAL, UNLESS THE WILL APPLICANT OBTAINS VERTICAL WILL APPLICANT OBTAINS VERTICAL STRUCTURE AND REVIEW EVENTS. STRUCTURE AND REVIEW EVENTS. >> VICE MAYOR: TO MAKE SURE, >> TO MAKE SURE, >> TO MAKE SURE, WE'LL >> TO MAKE SURE, WE'LL START >> TO MAKE SURE, WE'LL START QUESTIONS >> TO MAKE SURE, WE'LL START QUESTIONS ON >> TO MAKE SURE, WE'LL START QUESTIONS ON THIS WE'LL START QUESTIONS ON THIS SIDE, BE CAREFUL NOT TO GIVE AN SIDE, BE CAREFUL NOT TO GIVE AN OPINION UNTIL WE'VE HEARD ALL OF OPINION UNTIL WE'VE HEARD ALL OF THE EVIDENCE. THE EVIDENCE. COMMISSIONER WALKER? COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. NO, >> THANK YOU. NO, I >> THANK YOU. NO, I HAVE >> THANK YOU. NO, I HAVE NO >> THANK YOU. NO, I HAVE NO FURTHER >> THANK YOU. NO, I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS NO, I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS. ON THIS. >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> VICE >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> VICE MAYOR: >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> VICE MAYOR: I >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> VICE MAYOR: I HAVE >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> VICE MAYOR: I HAVE NO >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> VICE MAYOR: I HAVE NO FURTHER >> I HAVE NO FURTHER >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS EITHER. QUESTIONS EITHER. WE GO TO THE APPLICANT WE GO TO THE APPLICANT PRESENTATION. PRESENTATION. I THINK MOST OF THE QUESTIONS I THINK MOST OF THE QUESTIONS LAST TIME CAME FROM THE TWO LAST TIME CAME FROM THE TWO PEOPLE THAT AREN'T HERE TONIGHT. PEOPLE THAT AREN'T HERE TONIGHT. >> THANK YOU, AND GOOD EVENING >> THANK YOU, AND GOOD EVENING >> THANK YOU, AND GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS >> THANK YOU, AND GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS AND >> THANK YOU, AND GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF. COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF. I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING TO I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD WITHOUT RESTATING WHAT STAFF ADD WITHOUT RESTATING WHAT STAFF HAS PRESENTED TO YOU GUYS, I'LL HAS PRESENTED TO YOU GUYS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE, BUT WE QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE, BUT WE CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE CERTAINLY APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION OF OUR PROJECT. CONSIDERATION OF OUR PROJECT. WE'RE EXCITED TO GET MOVING ON. WE'RE EXCITED TO GET MOVING ON. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. >> LET ME ASK MY COLLEAGUES, >> LET ME ASK MY COLLEAGUES, >> LET ME ASK MY COLLEAGUES, COMMISSIONER >> LET ME ASK MY COLLEAGUES, COMMISSIONER TORNGA, >> LET ME ASK MY COLLEAGUES, COMMISSIONER TORNGA, ANY COMMISSIONER TORNGA, ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? >> NO. >> NO. >> NO. >> >> NO. >> VICE >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I HAVE >> NO. >> VICE MAYOR: I HAVE NONE >> I HAVE NONE >> I HAVE NONE EITHER. EITHER. APPRECIATE IT. APPRECIATE IT. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> >> THANK YOU. >> VICE >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL OPEN >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL OPEN IT >> THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: I'LL OPEN IT TO >> I'LL OPEN IT TO >> I'LL OPEN IT TO THE >> I'LL OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC >> I'LL OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC NOW, >> I'LL OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC NOW, DOES >> I'LL OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC NOW, DOES ANYONE >> I'LL OPEN IT TO THE PUBLIC NOW, DOES ANYONE WISH THE PUBLIC NOW, DOES ANYONE WISH TO COME FORWARD AND GIVE PUBLIC TO COME FORWARD AND GIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM. COMMENT ON THIS ITEM. SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. PUBLIC HEARING. THERE'S NO STAFF RESPONSE. THERE'S NO STAFF RESPONSE. WE'LL GO TO A MOVE. WE'LL GO TO A MOVE. MAY I HAVE A MOTION? MAY I HAVE A MOTION? >> SO MOVED. >> SO MOVED. >> SO MOVED. >> >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> >> SECOND. >> VICE >> SECOND. >> VICE MAYOR: >> SECOND. >> VICE MAYOR: FINAL >> SECOND. >> VICE MAYOR: FINAL COMMENTS? >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> I >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> I HAVE >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> I HAVE NONE, >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN >> FINAL COMMENTS? >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO SAY, >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO SAY, BEFORE >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO SAY, BEFORE WE >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO SAY, BEFORE WE LOOKED >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO SAY, BEFORE WE LOOKED AT >> I HAVE NONE, OTHER THAN TO SAY, BEFORE WE LOOKED AT IT, SAY, BEFORE WE LOOKED AT IT, ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS, THEY ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS, THEY WERE ANSWERED, AND IT LOOKS LIKE WERE ANSWERED, AND IT LOOKS LIKE A VERY VERY NICE PROJECT FOR A VERY VERY NICE PROJECT FOR THAT AREA. THAT AREA. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: COMMISSIONER >> COMMISSIONER >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? WALKER? >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE FACT >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT I >> I HAVE NO OTHER COMMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT I THINK EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT I THINK THE DESIGN THAT'S BEEN PRESENTED THE DESIGN THAT'S BEEN PRESENTED I THINK WILL BE A NICE ADD TO I THINK WILL BE A NICE ADD TO THAT PARTICULAR AREA. THAT PARTICULAR AREA. SO THANK YOU. SO THANK YOU. >> VICE MAYOR: I WATCHED THE >> I WATCHED THE >> I WATCHED THE FIRST >> I WATCHED THE FIRST HEARING, >> I WATCHED THE FIRST HEARING, A >> I WATCHED THE FIRST HEARING, A LOT >> I WATCHED THE FIRST HEARING, A LOT OF >> I WATCHED THE FIRST HEARING, A LOT OF THE FIRST HEARING, A LOT OF THE QUESTIONS WERE ANSWERED. QUESTIONS WERE ANSWERED. I'M GLAD YOU KEPT THE HEIGHT I'M GLAD YOU KEPT THE HEIGHT DOWN, IT WILL BE A NICE PROJECT DOWN, IT WILL BE A NICE PROJECT FOR THERE AS WELL. FOR THERE AS WELL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY, ROLL CALL VOTE? OKAY, ROLL CALL VOTE? >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> >> COMMISSIONER WALKER? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER >> AYE. >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> VICE >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> >> VICE MAYOR FREANEY? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. AND >> AYE. AND THAT >> AYE. AND THAT MOTION >> AYE. AND THAT MOTION PASSES AND THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. UNANIMOUSLY. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. OUR NEXT ITEM IS 2-C, THAT'S THE OUR NEXT ITEM IS 2-C, THAT'S THE PROPOSED AGENDA FOR THE PROPOSED AGENDA FOR THE SEPTEMBER 5th, 2024 COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5th, 2024 COMMISSION MEETING. MEETING. RECOGNITION OF GREATER DUNEDIN RECOGNITION OF GREATER DUNEDIN LITTLE LEAGUE IN THE LITTLE LEAGUE IN THE PRESENTATION AREA. PRESENTATION AREA. ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD OR TAKE AWAY? OR TAKE AWAY? ALL IN FAVOR OF THE SEPTEMBER ALL IN FAVOR OF THE SEPTEMBER 5th AGENDA? 5th AGENDA? I NEED A MOTION. I NEED A MOTION. >> SO MOVED. >> SO MOVED. >> SO MOVED. >> >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> >> SECOND. >> YOU'LL >> SECOND. >> YOU'LL IN >> SECOND. >> YOU'LL IN FAVOR? >> YOU'LL IN FAVOR? >> YOU'LL IN FAVOR? >> >> YOU'LL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> VICE >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: THAT >> AYE. >> VICE MAYOR: THAT MOTION >> THAT MOTION >> THAT MOTION PASSES >> THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE HAVE ALL KINDS OF GUARDIAN WE HAVE ALL KINDS OF GUARDIAN ANGELS TONIGHT. ANGELS TONIGHT. OKAY, ANY OTHER INFORMATIONAL OKAY, ANY OTHER INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER ITEMS FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER FROM MY COLLEAGUES? FROM MY COLLEAGUES? OR JORGE? OR JORGE? WE'RE GOOD? WE'RE GOOD? OKAY, THEN THIS MEETING IS OKAY, THEN THIS MEETING IS