Village Community Development District No. 12 (2025-07-10)

Roll call two subject jurors are missing. David Robbins and Ron Mackin. Please rise for the pledge allegiance in a moment of silence Under liberty and justice for all. Thank you. Welcome to District Twelve's meeting for July. Please this moment, please, if anybody has their phones, please silence them. At this time, if there's anything not on our agenda that needs to be discussed, please come to the microphone. State your name and address at this time. Good morning. Morning. My name is Randy Weatherford. I live at 1829 Alton Avenue, which is the village of Lindon over here across the street. My complaint, which isn't, isn't a complaint against the villages whatsoever, but, um, as property management has realized that they have, uh, closed the Rupert Dog Park for much needed maintenance. And, and that's great. I'm glad that they, they keep doing that periodically to keep the dog park up. What what has happened though is that unfortunately there are some residents in this area who feel as if it's necessary for them now that the gates are closed. And you have, you have a large dog park side and a small dog park side, and there's gates that are locked right now because of the maintenance. And these gates are closed. And now we have, again, some unfortunate residents who fill, it's necessary to throw their dog poop bags, I'm sorry, over the fence into the runway. You have a, you have a gate that, that goes in, then you have a runway, then there's another gate, and that's where the trash receptacles are, um, to dispose of such an item. Um, I, I was just wondering if it's possible, maybe going forward if commu, if property management or community watch or the people at River Bend Rec Center couldn't possibly take one of those, um, receptacles, trash receptacles and move it out to the front of this, of, of the gates so that when people walk by, they can throw it in there. I, I'm afraid that what's happening is, you know, as I go up to the postal station and every week I'm throwing away a flyer from Baldwin brothers cremation flyer, uh, that when you open that up, people are made. Now, I'm not saying they are, but they may now use that trash can as a, as a item or a way to dispose of this waste and or the, the picnic pavilion, which is right there. Uh, i, I know people from play pickleball in the afternoons. They will go up there and they will, you know, drink some wine or cheese or whatever. Um, and, and it's just, the odor would be, anyway, it's just a suggestion. Again, I'm not complaining about what's happening to, as far as what the property is doing, uh, the villages is doing. It's just that there's some unfortunate residents that feel as if it's necessary for the villages to pick up after their dog. That's, that's all I'm saying. Thank you for your time. Thank you. That's a great suggestion. I'm sure Mr. Mellinger is writing it down. Okay. Thank you. Any other at this time We Each Take three minutes. Sorry, just state your name and address, please. Yes, James Petkovic 5 9 9 0 Scardino Court. Um, oh, excuse me, street. I'm calling, uh, we're here today about 5 9 8 6 scardino, which is a property that's right next, next to our home that was condemned over a year ago by the county. Um, I made a call of this year in April of eighth, and the District 12 personnel did not know anything about that. The property was condemned. There's a small hole on the front yard that goes underneath their porch. Uh, they're calling it a sinkhole. Some call it a void. Okay. The property has been condemned and it looks like hell, uh, it has not been cut in over a year. Okay. I have talked to personnel in District 12 here. There's a deed compliance officer that was put on, on this case. Okay. And there was a placard left at the door in May. I've talked to the owner of the building. She has no, she's not returning to the building. She has abandoned the building and the property looks like hell. Mm-hmm. I mean, and I have, I have a photograph to leave with y'all if you'd like. I'm not quite sure what's going on, but it seems like the left hand doesn't know, the right hand exists, let alone communicate with it. And, uh, uh, the whole area is quite upset. It, it has a direct negative effect on our property values and, uh, somebody has to do something about it. And I, I, up north, I was in public service for 30 years and I understand that things don't take this long. They, they just can't take this long from one side of the aisle to talk to the other. Now, I don't know what would happen if this was in your, in your, in your little area where you live. You surely wouldn't like it. Thank you. And I have a photo here and invite my neighbors to say anything they want it. It's quite horrible. I'm Debbie, Jim's wife. The other thing, 'cause we live right next door, the problem is, is that the hole is not getting deeper. It's getting wider. It's going out towards the middle of their yard, but it's also now encroaching towards our sidewalks between their house and our house. We have tons of pictures and something has to get done 'cause we're the only ones that are trying to do something to protect our property. My name's Mike Frost. I live at 5 9 8 0 Sino. I've been here about since September. The second hurricane we had is when it, it, this ankle existed and no communication at all, uh, from either you guys or the villages. And from the neighbor, she's neglected the property. And like Jim said, it's gonna, it's gonna get bigger with the hurricanes come up. And we've only been here in less than a year. And I'm not too happy about this at all. 'cause it, it's a property value stinker. So I'd appreciate your concern and help with this. And sir, if you provide us with a photo, we do have to keep it as part of the record, if that's okay. Yeah. Just, And no, we'll pass it again, I go or not. My name's Gary Austin. I live at 2024 Maio Lane, which is directly across from this property. Uh, the property's in disarray. It's, it's, uh, not up kept. The sprinklers aren't running at all. Um, now that it's raining again, the, the weeds in the grass are growing out of control. The bushes, nothing, nothing looks good on the front of the property. So, uh, I did go to compliance, uh, this week and, uh, told them about the property again and they said they, they, there was on the agenda, but I'm not sure where that stands. So Thank you. I, where is this at again? Could, Could I ask? It's on Scardino, Um, Is that a monarch? Monarch Grove? Monarch Grove. Okay. Okay. The address is, uh, 59. Yeah. Is that near the area where we had the big sink hole? So there, there is a sink hole in the middle of this property, in the middle of the yard. And we are aware of it. Mr. Brianis can, can provide an update. Okay. So the last, uh, conversations I had with, uh, Mr. Armstrong, um, from what I understand, there's uh, something that's been placed on the property by the county where, uh, it's a danger and, and individuals are not allowed access to the property. Notwithstanding, um, deed compliance is going through the process. They are gonna bring the property to a hearing in front of Judge Neal, your special master, um, for deed compliance. That is because that is a requirement of your rule. There's been a complaint made. So we're following that process. Certainly there are defenses to that. Um, and that being that it's really impossible for the property owner to go onto the property because the county prohibits it. So there are some issues there. But again, it is gonna go to Judge Ne and Judge Ne will have to decide what she wants to do with that property and how she wants to rule on that. I'm not sure when that's gonna go. Um, we just had hearings for this month, so I imagine it's gonna be next month. Um, but Mr. Armstrong or Ms. Boyd may be able to provide more information on the actual date that it's gonna go before Judge Neal. Yeah, and Ms. Boyd is here. Sorry, mark. I didn't, I didn't catch that. Now, Which part? All of it. Well, you, you were kinda cutting in and out. So, So, so what I was saying is that the, the county has issued some form of order, from what I understand, that prohibits anybody from being on the property. Uh, that certainly, uh, has an effect on whether an owner or anybody can go on and maintain the property when the county's prohibiting it. Mm-hmm. Notwithstanding, uh, deed compliance is proceeding with the rule and with your process. And that will be presented. The case will be presented to Judge Neal, your special master, probably next month. And Judge Neal will need to decide what action she wants to take with the property. But again, even if you enter an order of enforcement, the district can't hire anybody to go and mow the lawn or anything like that because it's prohibited by the county. Nobody could be on the property. So it's, it's a strange one, but we're gonna proceed again with Judge Neil and, and see where it goes from there. Okay. Just, just a question. So I kind of understand, 'cause I, I'm familiar with the area, what happened before. Uh, is this sinkhole or what? A depression. What are you talking about? Is that in the front yard or the backyard? Front yard. It's in the front yard. It's in the front yard, Just in front of her front porch, the concrete porch. And now it's underneath the porch. There are no cracks on the porch. Uh, there's no cracks that are evident. And the gentleman to my left, uh, mark is correct. The county did put a sign up, no trespassing. They condemned the property. I dunno how or why they did that. Um, there, there, I mean, I'm not a structural engineer by any means, but we can't see anything wrong with the property other than the sinkhole. I have been, uh, shoring up my end. Uh, it's going onto my property and I have, uh, about 26 bags of sand the concrete. Uh, and so I'm doing my best to keep my land from falling to hers. Um, I, I mean, she's not returning. Um, I, I just don't think it's right for this eyesore to continue. I mean, I do understand the issue of, you know, you can't go on the property and to cut it. You can't, but something has to be done. I mean, you know, I mean, living next to this, I mean, I mean, this is more than a year old. Yep. And the year before that, the whole street was condemned and we had to stay a month in the hotel. Mm-hmm. You know, and I understand that's not your fault either, but, you know, uh, I'll tell you what, as a public servant, I saved my whole life to come down here. I'm, I'm living literally next to an inner city property now. How, how would you like that? Anybody here? How would you like that to work your ass off all your life and to look at that? You have the photos. So Mr. Chair, Something different that can be done to cut that grass. Ms. Ms. Boyd is here. Um, and she can provide an update of where we are on the public hearing process, um, with the property. Yes. 'cause it's out of our control. It's by the county. We can't do anything with it. And so just sit this way forever. I mean, it's, there's gotta be Something that can be done. It's gotta go through the process, which is what community standards is gonna do. They're in the process of doing that. But please let her explain. It took a year for the left hand to know the right hand existed because District 12 didn't, didn't even know that there was an issue until I called them in May and the property was abandoned. Last May, I'm at five 90. Sir, you, you do need to step up to the mic, but I believe the chair has asked staff to respond. So if you will let her respond, please. Yes. Because It's also a safety issue. Nothing's even marked Off. Good Morning Board, Shannon Boyd. Community standards, uh, the third letter, which would be the notice of public hearing, is sent to be set out, uh, sent out today. And it'll be for an August 4th public hearing, which is held at 2:00 PM at the district offices. And Ms. Boyd, uh, is the violation that is going before them, is it the tall, the appearance of the property? It is. It's For tall grass and weeds. So the, the order of enforcement that your rule allows for, for tall grass and weeds states that if it's not run into compliance within a certain amount of time, that staff is authorized to hire somebody to go on and maintain the property. Unfortunately, we are not going to hire somebody to go into a property that this, the county has confirmed, condemned, and nobody can trespass on. We will call the county. I don't know what their requirements are as far as, um, rectifying this type of situation. It doesn't fall under the district's purview. We handle things such as the external appearance through your deed restrictions. Um, but we can't force somebody to fix a sinkhole. I don't know what requirements the City of Wild Road or the county has. Um, but we'll do a little bit of homework. And again, it doesn't fall under your purview, but just for our own information and the board's information, and we'll be happy to send that out. Um, and to the residents, I would encourage you to have these conversations with Sumter County. I don't, again, know what their requirements are as far as if you have some type of natural disaster on your property, at what point you are required, or if at any point they step in, that just is outside of my knowledge of, of the districts. Um, but again, for the benefit of the board, we'll certainly reach out and find out what we can about the property And then we can pass it along to them. Yes. At that time, if we Can, if you'd like to give Ms. Boyd your, um, email information, then if we, if we find anything out, then we'd be happy to pass it along. And then also find a good contact for you, um, either with a city or county so that you can not put us in the middle if you'd prefer to work with them directly as well. I just wanted You, and if you could, if you, if you have more comments, you do have to use the mic just so that we can get it on the record. Alright. I, I thank you for your time. I, I just want this repaired or at least have the property look as nice as all the other properties. I mean, again, you know, the neighbor is a friend. Uh, she walked away from the property. She has no intention of coming back. She's married, moved to another city. And any notice that you might be sending out, I am sure she's not getting it. I'm pretty sure that she has told us the same, that she's walked away from the property. Right. Okay. And so I, I need, I need some information from the county. what judge is gonna handle this. Um, and, and I do know that she, the neighbor, uh, who, who's the owner, she hired an insurance company. She's, uh, excuse me, a law firm. She's fighting her insurance company who, uh, refuses to do anything about the so-called sinkhole. So they're in a battle right now. And so we might be looking at a two, three year situation here, or even longer. And, and I, I can't even step away from my property. I mean, I can't sell my property and move somewhere else in the villages because what am I gonna get for it? My property looks great. So does all my neighbors. I mean, they, I mean, they're out there two times a week now, cutting the grass 'cause it's growing season and next door looks like crap. So I, you know, do I take a chance and cut the grass myself? I mean, uh, I'll do whatever's necessary, but I'm not gonna wait two, three years for this to be resolved. I mean, again, I mean, you know, 30 years I served in public service in another state, there's always some way to rectify a situation. Always. That is, that's, that's much quicker than this. Thank you. Thank You. Good morning. Todd Mason. 5 9 6 5 Scardino Street. My concerns with the whole is it's a safety issue. God forbid there's some type of, uh, emergency and first responders or whatever have to go into that area. Somebody's gonna get hurt, which just needs to, or at least make them aware of this dangerous situation that if somebody goes on that property, they're gonna get hurt. Even a delivery person. I, I saw no markings or anything in that photo at all. I, yeah, I, I would assume, and I hate to assume, I would assume that the city and county is aware since it has been deemed as condemned. But we will make sure that, and I, I don't know whether it's the city or the county that handles it, um, through code enforcement or, or establishes it as condemned. Um, so we'll reach out to, to both and make sure that we find out. Alright, Thank you. Yeah, I just wanna say it's really unfair to all of us in the neighborhood to have this, this house in this condition. And you say she walked away, is that mean it's going to foreclosure? I, I don't know what walk away Means. I, I don't know. Alright, So, uh, yeah, well it just needs to be fixed. I mean, it's been like, like Jim said, it's been a year now and it's, it's, uh, a little bit more than than we wanna take. Uh, it's going to the, going to the board. That's what has to be done. The process has to go through that steps. Okay. That's our requirements. Okay. I'm Debbie Petkovic again. Just to re just to add something. One of our major concerns is, is that hole that is now widening towards our property. We have a right to protect our property. What we need to know, I mean, besides put, we're doing the sandbags. We're we're putting, we put in a big tarp. We need to protect that because every rain, it erodes more and more and more towards our sidewalk by our garage. We need to know how we can protect our property the right way, even though we're not allowed on the property. We still have to protect, we have to be there to protect our property. Our property, as you could see, I have hundreds of pictures and it's actually going, it's encroaching towards our sidewalk, like I said, going underneath the sidewalk. I have plenty of pictures. We need to know whether it's the city, the county, whoever, the villages, how we can protect our property from this even getting worsening by widening towards our property. Well, we can't wait another year. We made a suggestion. You gotta go to the county or to Wildwood. It is deemed in their area. So you have to find out what their requirements are. That's, we can't do anything about it. It falls under their, 'cause they're, the county's the one that did the no trespassing on it. So you need to go to the county on that. But the district's gonna contact 'em for you, right? Yes. So you, the district's gonna, they obviously will answer your phone call, Courtney, what's going on? Yes. If you'll provide Ms. Boyd with your contact information, we will make sure whoever we find out is the appropriate contact for this. Make sure that you have their information. Yeah, We're giving. Thank you very much. You're Welcome. Thank you. Any other comments from the audience at this time? Moving on, law, law enforcement. Good morning, captain Kinder, Wildwood Police Department. Uh, we've got two events that are coming up. Uh, one we have, which is tomorrow is our back to school Pack a Cruiser. Uh, I believe this is our second annual, uh, toiletry drive. It's gonna be for the schools. And what we do is, uh, we go up to Walmart, uh, Walmart on Wedgewood, it'll be tomorrow. And, uh, people that go in, they get, uh, toilet tree items. Uh, we make sure that students get those. We distribute 'em throughout all the different schools. Uh, last year, I believe we gave, uh, almost 600 bags of toiletries to students that needed them. Um, we found out they need those a lot more than they did. School supplies. Toiletries are expensive. So again, that's gonna be tomorrow. Uh, we're gonna be at the Walmart tomorrow, uh, from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM or people can drop it off at the police department. The second, uh, event that we've got is going to be, we're calling it the Fall to finance. It's gonna be Thursday, August 14th from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM Uh, it is a registered only event. There's gonna be local banks and financial advisors that are gonna be there to help people kind of talk about any finance issues that they have. Our role as the police department, we're gonna be presenting scams and how to avoid those types of scams. And that'll be our role within that department. Again, make sure that if somebody is interested, uh, that they register. And, uh, at the end of the next meeting, I'll leave these flyers with you if that'll be okay. Thank you. And if you guys had any questions? No. If not, then that's all I have for this meeting. Thank you. Appreciate, Thank you. Moving on. Approval of the minutes. Do I have a motion to approve the minutes? So move Second. Have a second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Aye. Thank you. Termination. She's coming. Good Morning Board Emily Morrison purchasing. Today I am requesting approval to terminate agreement 24 B dash 0 24 with Tri-State Asphalt Corporation for cut and patch asphalt repair services. This agreement provides localized asphalt repairs as needed to the, to maintain district roadways. And on April 28th, Tri-State Asphalt issued a notice of its intent to terminate the contract due to operational capacity and management challenges, which is not an allowable reason for termination. Underneath this agreement, despite a formal request to resume work, the contractor failed to respond or to perform cons constituting non-performance. So at this time, staff requests approval to terminate per cause 24 B dash 0 2 4 with Tri-State Asphalt Corporation based on non-performance and to maintain continuity of services. In the meantime, staff will utilize an existing general maintenance agreement on an interim basis while the new solicitation can be processed. And here, if you have any questions, I have a couple of questions. Okay. Th this is a breach, no question about it. Yes. Uh, the, and maybe Mark can chime in on this. Uh, but two things come to my mind is, uh, if we, uh, terminate the contract, are we waiving any claims against this contractor with respect to any damages that may flow from the breach? Uh, and do does question number one. Uh, question number two, probably more directly to you is have we made an assessment in terms of, uh, what, uh, damages? I know we're, we're covering the, the work with other funds from other sources that these folks are supposed to be doing. So we're gonna be spending money, uh, in other areas. I mean, I know we have the money to do so, but the question is, is that appropriate? Uh, have we made any type of, uh, assessment in terms of what the impact? I, I know that the impact, uh, statement in, in, in the paperwork here doesn't really address that. But I'm curious to know, uh, because personally, if we let these people just simply walk away, you know, and I think I've seen this happen a couple of times now, maybe not in this district, in other areas where these contractors, you know, say, I'm sorry, I'm can't do it. You know, I, uh, I'm out of here, and then they walk away and we just can't let that happen. So what are our remedies beyond this mark? Uh, and secondly, you know, do we have any type of an idea of what this is gonna be costing us until we go through the whole process again of, you know, new bids and everything else? Anything else? The current agreement was just for as needed services at a square yard unit cost. And underneath the new general maintenance agreement, because it was an RFQ, we would just get quotes. I did pull, um, out of our purchase order system, your history, and we haven't had any of this cut and patch type of service done for you guys for district 12 since November of 2022, it looks like. Um, so I would, my hope would be that you wouldn't need to use it for anything, but if you did, we would get the best pricing through the general maintenance agreements in the meantime. And we are, we will be bringing back another agenda item upon your approval today to suspend them from being able to bid again. So they, they will not be able to bid on any solicitations that we put out moving forward for whatever time is determined. Yeah. By Management. Thank you. And, and that I I, I appreciate that. I guess the question is, I, I don't want be waiving anything, any claims against potential claims or otherwise, uh, by doing this, uh, By terminating, by terminating the contract. Yes, You're right. So I haven't seen this specific contract since it was approved. Um, but what you can do if you terminate, you still have the opportunity to sue for damages for the difference between what you're gonna have to pay the new contractor to the old. Right. Um, generally, and the contracts are usually the same that the language that's here, you know, does permit the termination. I would want to make sure that we have, um, written and confirmation from the contractor, whether by emails or letters, and it sounds like we do, where they have said, look, we can't do it. We're not gonna do it. Um, I think that's sufficient to attach to a lawsuit along with a copy of a contract from me, a new contractor that shows the difference in the amount, um, as far as damages is concerned. So I'm not necessarily concerned about any waiver because we clearly have, um, written documentation from them saying they're not gonna do it. That is a breach of contract and we have the right under the contract to terminate. We always have that. Right. I do review the contracts, it's just been a while since I've seen this one. Um, and we do have that language in all our contracts, so I'm not concerned with it. I mean, I think we can proceed with a termination and you still have a viable claim for damages. We don't know what our damages are yet. Right. Um, we're gonna have to go out and find out who's gonna be out there and what they're gonna charge to do the work. Maybe it's less, if it's more than you need to decide, is it that much more that we wanna file a lawsuit or are we happy with just saying we're not gonna award contracts to you any further, any longer? What, what was the expiration date, the actual expiration date on this contract? Do, do we know The current expiration date is nine 30 of 2026 and it would've had one two year renewal. So 2026. Mm-hmm. Okay. I, and just as, just as a general proposition, just a question, I know that we are bound by the overall requirements that everybody contracting with these people, you know, are imposed. Do we ever, uh, require performance bonds on these types of contracts? Performance bonds are usually only required if the project exceeds over a hundred thousand. And these are typically very small dollar amounts. So a threshold is a hundred thousand for performance bonds? That's Correct. Okay. I have a question. Is any, are they doing any work for any other of the districts? Do we have the same problem and the other districts? They, they have an agreement with every district that we have, but it's just for as needed services. So I, I wouldn't say that they're locked into doing anything. And I believe that they completed any purchase orders that were out there before they gave us their official date that they would no longer be able to proceed. Right. You said it was 2022 The last time They did anything for this district? The last purchase order that was done was 2022 and it was actually for $9,000. Okay. Which is a large amount based on what all the other districts are using them for. They're usually only a few hundred dollars. Do I have a motion on this from the board? I, I'll make the motion. We all in favor? Aye. Aye. Thank you. Thank you. Moving on. Old business. Yes, sir. The first item on old business is, um, the board asked us to obtain cost for striping if the district chose to proceed individually, um, as well as to provide an original, uh, or a copy of the original engineer's report. We did provide that to you via email on June 16th, and it is approximately $9,100 to, um, Stripe according, um, to the prior study. And that striping would've been four inches wide. I would like to just, um, reiterate to the board that one of the takeaways from the engineer's report and recommendations was the importance of maintaining consistency. They didn't necessarily recommend RPMs or striping, but if any district was to elect to do one, they reiterated that consistency so that drivers would know what to expect was the most important. There is a multimodal path discussion group coming up, I believe it's in August, um, in which I think that will probably, uh, be a topic of discussion. So, uh, it would be my recommendation that you not take any formal action on RPMs or striping until you at least have that conversation with the multi multimodal path discussion group, um, to see if there is any type of consistency or, um, desire for consistency across the board. Well, I, and I thought that's what we, at the last meeting, we said at the next PWAC meeting, our position would be that we, we were in favor of doing it, provided it was consistent with what other people are doing. Unfortunately, we haven't had a pwac meeting since, since our last meeting. That meeting is Monday. Yeah. So that's the position I will take on Monday. Uh, of course, I I did review the, the report that you, uh, that you sent us, and I appreciate that. And I think it's kind of summed up on page seven of this 13 page report. Obviously this is from 2015 and a lot of things have changed since 2015. Uh, but it's a very low crash frequency during nighttime hours and does not indicate a crash trend that would be corrected by the installation. There's a lot more traffic now than there was in 2015. So that's the position I'll take Monday at Pwac board. I like just to move it to our August meeting and see what happens after. Yeah. 'cause I think the most immediate path is, yeah, I think the second week of August. Yeah, right in September 23rd. It was new to September 23rd. Okay. So we'll just wait until after we have that meeting and then discuss it. I, I, I, I concur with that. Uh, and I think we should wait. Yes. Uh, but I, I, I will state, um, a concern that I have about the report and the way it has been written, uh, and maybe there is underlying data to ba to back this up. Uh, it's these, these are conclusory statements. IE there is no evidence that the striping or the other, you know, reduce or increase or other. Now uniformity to me could be interpreted in terms of liability or aesthetics. And, uh, I think that one of the things that, uh, Dale, that maybe you can inquire, uh, when you have this discussion is what type of evidence or, uh, studies or other, you know, data do they have to back to this opinion because it has legal implications, uh, and can be used for or against you. But I, uh, it just, uh, to me is, I read the report again, Dale, and it, it appeared to be a raw conclusion. You know, this is gonna happen or that's not gonna happen. Uh, but I wanna make sure that when we do look at this thing, we are fully informed in terms of what the underlying assumptions are based on. That's all. Just a comment. Thank you. Any other comments? Moving on. Nothing else on no business architectural review. Good morning board, Shannon Boyd Community Standards. At the June 12th, 2025 board meeting staff presented information regarding metal roofs in the growing demand from homeowners seeking approval for standing seam style metal roof installations. The board of supervisors directed staff to bring back the proposed architectural review manual revisions to provide guidance to residents and the architectural review hearing officer regarding standing seam style metal roofs. These proposed changes aim to provide clarity for homeowners considering metal roof installations while upholding the aesthetics of the villages. The proposed a RC manual revisions include shingle upgrades to include other solar shingle, uh, manufacturers and metal roofing options, and to clarifying color requirements for reroofing projects. Staff recommends a board of supervisors review the proposed a RC manual changes, provide any feedback, and if no recommendations or changes are requested, approve the a RC manual, uh, revisions as presented and to take effect July 10th, 2025. And I'm here to answer any questions that you may have. I have no questions. Do you? No, I, I, I, I looked at them and they're pretty, pretty good. I mean, they, they cover the areas in question and I think that, uh, it's gonna be a case by case basis anyway, but at least there'll be some, some guidance. So I, I, you know, I think it's good job. Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate that. Thank you. Moving on. Motion. Yeah, we would need a motion to approve the a RC manual revisions Move. So moved. Second. All in favor? Aye. A aye. Thank you board. And the final item on old business, uh, was to review the board meeting schedule that was provided to you last month. The board did indicate that you needed some time to look through it before, um, approving, so I would just, um, ask the board if you are okay with this schedule. It would be on your August meeting agenda for approval. I'm okay with it. I'm fine with it. I'm Fine with it. Put it to our report. Thank you. Thank you. I would move that we do that. It would need, do we require a motion for this Or no, sir. Not until August. Okay, good. Thank you. Approval. Any comments on the information only items from the board? Moving on District council Report? Yes. I just wanted, I have one report and I wanted to bring to the board's attention that there is an opportunity if this district is interested in adopting a rule to enforce any age related deed, um, restrictions in your declarations within District 12. If there's any interest, um, district management would then proceed with providing you with more information on that. But before we proceed, we need to find out whether District 12 has any, any interest in enforcing that area of the deed restrictions. So the, the two deed restrictions that this could potentially, um, apply to would be that no child under the age of 19 can reside in the home for more than 30 days. And that at least one member of the home must be 55 and up. Those are in the majority of deed restrictions, but we have not gone through every single one with a fine tooth comb yet, as the boards have not previously adopted rules to enforce those deed restrictions. Um, but if you are interested in doing so, then staff would, um, come back to you next month with an agenda item in which you would advertise for a public hearing to amend and restate your rule to bring about deed compliance, incorporating those two items if in all of your due restrictions into your matrix. So the question is, are other districts already done that? No. Um, this is the first, actually the first board that we are bringing it up to because you were the first residential, um, district board meeting of the month. Um, so we are presenting it to you for consideration and it will be presented to all other residential districts, um, throughout the next two weeks. I would like to have it The agenda. I'd like to hear more. Yeah, I would love to hear more. Yeah, Absolutely. I Dunno why, but I thought that was the rule. It is the rule, but currently the only enforcer of that rule is the developer or any other affected property owner. We are now asking if you as a district, similar to how you enforce other external deed restrictions such as, um, tall grass and weeds and, um, roof through your a RC manual. If you would like to enforce this and have the ability to enter into orders of enforcements and potentially fine, um, then we would bring this back to you for consideration. I I would like to do that. Do a little bit deeper dive into that. Yes. Does the developer have to relinquish that internal deed constraint? No. The deed restrictions are a contract between the declarant or the developer and the property owner. So that you adopting your rule would not, um, take anything away from the developer's ability to enforce. So what would happen would be the same thing that happened when you decided you were gonna start enforcing rules concerning the, uh, external deed restrictions. Developer would give you a Right. Uh, not necessarily an assignment, but a consent to go ahead and proceed with that as well. Okay. Yep. So yes, we're in favor of having that Done then. So next month on your agenda will be, um, a request to advertise for a public hearing for a rule change that would take place two months after you authorize us to advertise. So in October. Um, and we would spend the next couple months putting together, um, procedures to actually implement that as it is going to be different from any deed restriction that we've ever enforced before. Good. That's my only report. Okay. I skipped you. I I have no reports. I've talked enough today. Uh, moving on. Any comments from the supervisors at this time? Uh, I just wanna say that I have, uh, I was driving down, I guess the Accenture Marsh bend down by Fey and I see where there had been a series of replacements to the, uh, to the fencing at least it looked fairly new. And, uh, you know, I brought this issue up several months ago and it, it was addressed promptly, uh, at the time. And, uh, I'm glad to see that it is looking good. So I just want to, uh, give a shout out, uh, for that. So thank you. I will pass that along to property management. Thank you. Yes. Uh, and again, PW is Monday, so we, we are not got any continuity there. I I don't know about the other board members. I'm getting, uh, I had two people at my home this morning. Uh, uh, and I've had several contacts with regards to the health, health bankruptcy, and I realize this is probably not the forum for that, but, and I also personally have a lot, lot of questions. Uh, I guess I would like to know where I can direct these people, uh, and, and we can get the kind of answers that I think that, that we deserve. The only thing that I am familiar with is the same letter link that you received. Um, I received the same one through text. What was it? Friday? Um, I believe that there is a name on that letter and possibly a phone number. I'm not sure. I'd have to pull it back up. But that is, we have received no additional information other than that I didn't, I don't think I got that. Of course, I was traveling last week and I'm not the most religious guy with regards to the, to the computer. I'll, I'll, I'll look it, it does not, um, fall under the purview of the board, but I'll try to find that information and inform. Could, Could you also find, because I, I noticed when I got the letter, maybe I missed it, that conspicuous by its absence was the style of the bankruptcy in, in the case number, because that's a chap. It's 11, it's an 11. What? It says, no, it's an 11. I understand that it's a chapter 11, but I, I didn't see or discern, maybe I missed it again. Uh, where was it filed? What is the case number and the style so that, because all chapter elevens and all these, you know, they, they submit plans for reorganization and there's things in there that, you know, a lawyer like Mark or I can kind of look into, uh, and get some of this information on our own. But that would be helpful if we just do the case number and where it's filed. Yep. And, and you would have to reach out to them for that. That's not something that they, You'll forward it that other then. Yes, sir. I certainly will do that. Okay. I have no comments at this time. Motion to adjourn. So moved. Second. Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Median adjourn. Thank you.