POLISCOPE

The public record

OAKLEY (CONTRACOSTA COUNTY)Decisions and attributed speech publishedPartial coverage

Aug 9, 2022 - 06:49 PM

Tuesday, August 9, 2022 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Aug 9, 2022 - 06:49 PM

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record and a transcript or captions are published for this meeting.

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Aug 3, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

This source published text without speaker turns, so speakers and timestamps are not shown.

The opening of 130,265 stored characters

>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, MAYOR, YOU DID A GOOD JOB WHAT THE ITEM IS, THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE IS BEING HELD IN LONG BEACH NEXT MONTH, SEPTEMBER 7-9, THEY HAVE THEIR BUSINESS MEETING WHO THEY ARE ABLE TO VOTE ON ITEMS AND IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO SELECT A VOTING DELEGATE AND AN ALTERNATE, IN THIS CASE, WE HAVE COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS WHO HAS OPTED TO GO TO THE CONFERENCE, SHE WILL BE OUR ONLY ATTENDEE AS OF RIGHT NOW, THE ITEM IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT IS A RESOLUTION TO SELECT COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS AS THE VOTING DELEGATE OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY, THERE ARE NO ITEMS TO BE VOTED ON SPECIFICALLY, THERE ARE BYLAW AMENDMENTS THAT WILL BE PROPOSED, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED THOSE, AS SOON AS WE RECEIVE THOSE, WE'LL FORWARD THOSE ON TO CITY COUNCIL, WE WILL FILL OUT THE VOTING DELEGATE INFORMATION AND SEND THAT IN TO THE LEAGUE. >> ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK? DELIBERATIONS? OR A MOTION? >> I MOVE APPROVAL OF APPOINTING COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS AS OUR DELEGATE. >> SECOND. >> THAT WAS A DEAD TIE. >> WE HAVE A FIRST AND TWO SECONDS, ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> OPPOSED, ABSTENTIONS? IT'S UNANIMOUS. 5.2 WHICH IS THE CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZE THING CITY MANAGER TO SEND A LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPENING OF THE MARSH CREEK STATE HISTORIC PARK. MR. MCMURRAY? >> YES, COLIN COFFEE T BOARD PRESIDENT FOR THE REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT SENT AN E-MAIL TO YOU AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE CITY COUNCIL ASKING FOR SUPPORT OF THE MARSH CREEK STATE HISTORIC PARK, SO IN TURN, WE ARE BRINGING THIS ITEM FORWARD TO SEE IF THERE'S [INAUDIBLE] FOR THIS REGIONAL FACILITY, JUST AS SOME BACKGROUND, THE MARSH CREEK STATE PARK IS LOCATED IN THE EASTERN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BUT ON THE WEST END OF BRANT WOOD BY THEIR TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT OFF MARSH ROAD, IT'S IN BETWEEN THE ROUND VALLEY PARK AS WELL AS THE DEER VALLEY PARK AND THERE WAS -- IT WAS ABOUT 3600 ACRES AND OPENING THE FACILITY WOULD FACILITATE A LOT OF CONNECTIVITY TO BOTH OPEN SPACE AND REAMING TRAILS IN THE PARK DISTRICT'S GENERAL PLAN WHICH WAS ADOPTED IN 2012, THEY LISTED A MULTITUDE OF FACILITIES THAT COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE PARK AS WELL AS USES OF THE PARK FACILITY BUT SINCE THAT TIME, THERE HAS BEEN NO FUNDING AND THE PARK DISTRICT HAS NOT MOVED FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT, THIS IS THE BOARD PRESIDENT ASKING FOR THE CITY SUPPORT, I HAVE ASKED THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD AS WELL AND THEY ARE SUPPORTIVE OF THIS EFFORT AS WELL JUST SO YOU KNOW, BUT OUR RECOMMENDATION AND WE'VE ATTACHED A DRAFT LETTER TO THE STAFF REPORT BUT OUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO DIRECT ME TO SEND THAT LETTER ONCE SIGNED BY THE MAYOR AGAIN TO THE REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT AS WELL AS OUR LOCAL AND STATE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? MS. HIGGINS? >> I READ THAT LETTER BUT I DON'T REMEMBER MR. COFFEE ASKING IF WE'RE GOING TO BE SOME WAY HAVING TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT THIS BY SUPPORTING THIS. >> THERE IS NO COMMITMENT IN THE LETTER FOR CITY FINANCING OR THE CITY OFFERING OF ANY MONETARY COMMITMENT. IT'S MORE OF AN URGING OF THE STATE AND LOCAL ELECTEDS TO PRIORITIZE THIS PARK FACILITY AND TRY TO FIND FUNDING FOR IT. >> THANK YOU. >> MR. FULLER? >> YES, I JUST WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR PUTTING THE MAP UP, TO BE HONEST, THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE GOTTEN A GOOD LOCATION OF WHERE MARSH CREEK PARK IS, HAVING HEARD A LOT ABOUT IT, IF WE COULD PUT BOTH MAPS OR DIAGRAMS UP ON OUR WEBSITE, LET THEM KNOW THIS IS WHAT WE'RE PACKING AND WHERE IT IS, I'M SURE THEY CAN LOOK AT THESE PARK SECTIONS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO BUT I'M GLAD THAT YOU GAVE IT MORE SPECIFICALLY, THANK YOU. >> ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM? OKAY, WE'LL MOVE INTO DELIBERATIONS OR A MOTION. >> I'LL MOVE APPROVAL. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A FIRST AND SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> OPPOSED OR ABSTENTIONS? NONE, IT'S UNANIMOUS. >> 5.3 WHICH IS CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OAKLEY FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 BUDGET SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE PILOT PROGRAM WE HAVE FOR THE OAKLEY COMMUNITY DIGITAL GIFT CARD PROGRAM. >> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR POPE, VICE MAYOR MED DOSE, COUNCILMEMBER AND IS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, MY NAME IS HARUMI AND I'M BRINGING FORWARD THE CONSIDERATION THAT ALLOWS CONSIDERATION OF THE OAKLEY COMMUNITY GIFT CARD PROGRAM AND I WILL GO OVER THE DETAILS OF THE PROGRAM AS WELL AS THE BRIEF REPORT OF THE PROGRAM, EVALUATION WITH MY PRESENTATION. BACK IN JUNE, WE IMPLEMENTED TWO SMALL BUSINESS RELATED PROGRAMS, THE FIRST ONE WAS THE OAKLEY DIGITAL MARKET, THAT PROPOSED LOCAL PRODUCTS AND MAKERS ONLINE AND THE SECOND ONE WAS THE COMMUNITY GIFT CARD PROGRAM AND BOTH DIGITAL ONLINE PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORT ECONOMIC RETENTION AND RECOVERY RELATED TO THE PANDEMIC AND I'M SURE YOU KNOW ABOUT THE GIFT CARD PROGRAM BUT JUST TO QUICKLY RECAP HOW THE COMMUNITY CARD WORKS, WE SELECTED A SERVICE PLATFORM WHICH IS ALL IN DIGITAL AND JUST THAT'S HOW THEY MAINTAIN AT LOW COST, AND HERE IS HOW THE YEFTI WEB PAGE FOR THE CITY OF OAKLAND AS YOU COULD SEE ON THIS SLIDE WHICH -- SO THAT PEOPLE COULD GO ONLINE AND THEY COULD CHOOSE THE AMOUNT BETWEEN $25, $150 AND CAN CHOOSE WHO TO SEND THE GIFT CARD TO, IT CAN BE THEIR FRIENDS, FAMILY AND THEMSELVES AND ALSO MANAGE TO -- WE ALSO MANAGE TO SELL MULTIPLE BULK PURCHASES THAT CAN BE GIVEN TO MULTIPLE PEOPLE ESPECIALLY AT A LARGE CORPORATION WITH EMPLOYEES FOR A ESSENTIAL OCCASION. AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE BUYER ONLY PAYS THE FACE VALUE OF THE CARD AND THE REST OF THE FEES INCLUDING THE MATCHED GIFT AMOUNT ARE COVERED BY OUR PROGRAM FUND. IT WORKS WITH THE MASTERCARD, THEY USE RESTRICTED ACCESS CARD WHICH WORKS AT A CERTAIN LOCATION, THE BUSINESSES THAT OPTED IN, AND WE CURRENTLY SUPPORT NEARLY 400 COMMUNITIES NATIONWIDE INCLUDING OAKLEY AND TYPICALLY EACH COMMUNITY HAS ABOUT 50-100 LOCATIONS LISTED IN THE COMMUNITY AND IN OUR CASE T CITY AS AN ORGANIZER OF THIS PROGRAM, WE INVITED ALL THE BUSINESS LICENSE HOLDERS IN THE CITY AND WE STARTED WITH 23 LOCATIONS AND WE CURRENTLY HAVE 25 LOCATIONS LISTED AND ALL THESE LOCATIONS MEET THREE CONDITIONS, FIRST THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE OAKLEY BUSINESS LICENSE AND IT TAKES MASTERCARD AS A PAYMENT OPTION AND ARE INDEPENDENTLY OWNED BY A LOCAL OWNER AND WE CONTINUE TO INVITE AND ENCOURAGE MORE LOCAL BUSINESSES TO JOIN AS THE CARD IS GOOD FOR A YEAR FROM THE PURCHASE DATE. I WANTED TO GO OVER HOW WELL THIS PROGRAM HAS ACHIEVED ITS GOALS, WE SOLD OUT THE BUSINESS CARD VERY FAST, WITHIN FIVE WEEKS OF THE LAUNCH WHICH IS THE FASTEST TIME THAT'S RECORDED FOR OUR POPULATION SIZE AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE THE HIGHLIGHT THE FACT THAT UNLIKE OTHER COMMUNITIES, WE DID NOT SEND MY PR MARKETING MATERIAL AND RELIED ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE AND MARQUEES ON THE STREET SO, THE 100% OF THE FUND WENT DIRECTLY TO THIS PROGRAM FUND AND 71% OF THE PART PANTING LOCAL BUSINESSES HAVE REDEEMED SHOP OAKLEY CARDS WITHIN THE FIRST FIVE WEEKS AND ALTHOUGH THE CARD DID NOT EXPIRE FOR ABOUT A YEAR, 46% OF THE TOTAL SALES HAVE ALREADY BEEN REDEEMED IN THE FIRST FEW WEEKS, AND WE DID THE MATCH OF $25, $50, $100 AND $150 AND 77% OF GIFT CARDS WERE SOLD IN $150 VALUE WHICH MAKES SENSE BECAUSE THERE WAS A LIMIT OF TWO BONUS CARD PER PERSON SO THAT IF YOU WANT TO MAX OUT YOUR GIFT CARD AT NO COST ASPECT, YOU WANT TO BUY $150 CARD SO I'M GLAD PEOPLE WERE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROGRAM FUND. AND AS FOR THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR, HERE IS THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT METRICS, IT'S ONLY BEEN OPERATIONAL FOR ABOUT TEN WEEKS NOW AND TOTAL AMOUNT OF FUNDS RAISED THROUGH THIS PROGRAM SO FAR IS AROUND 100 THOUSAND DOLLARS BECAUSE OF THE MATCH AND NET CASH VALUE OF 44 THOUSAND DOLLARS, THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN REDEEMED BY THOSE BUSINESSES PARTICIPATING BUSINESSES AND 1 THOUSAND DOLLARS OF DISCREPANCIES HERE THAT YOU COULD SEE BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY PURCHASES OF 45 THOUSAND AND 44 THOUSAND OF ACTUAL REDEMPTION FEES IS DUE TO THE CREDIT CARD FEES WHICH TYPICALLY COSTS TO A BUSINESS 1.5 TO 3 PERCENT OF EACH TRANSACTION BUT REGARDLESS, WE CAN CONCLUDE THAT THE FUNDS HAS ALREADY BEEN PUT TO WORK TO THE LOCAL SHOPS AND BUSINESSES AND RESTAURANTS IN THE CITY OF OAKLEY VERY EFFECTIVELY AND THE DATA GIVEN BY THE YEFTI ALSO SHOWS THE 30% OF SHOPPERS ENDED UP SPENDING MORE THAN THEY PLANNED ORIGINALLY WHEN THEY VISIT THE STORE WITH A GIFT CARD AND 51% OF SHOPPERS TRIED NEW PLACES. AND ANOTHER ASPECT OF FOCUS I WANTED TO SEE THE QUALITATIVE DATA, WE CONDUCTED A SURVEY THAT HELPED US BETTER UNDERSTAND OUR STAKEHOLDERS AND LEARN HOW THEY FEEL ABOUT THE SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF THIS PROGRAM AND SO FAR THE FEEDBACK RECEIVED WAS ALL POSITIVE, THEY REALLY LIKED THIS PROGRAM AND ESPECIALLY FROM THE PARTICIPATING BUSINESSES, THE FEEDBACK CONFIRMS THE CUSTOMERS WERE TRYING NEW ITEMS, EXPLORED NEW LOCATIONS AND BUSINESSES ARE ATTRACTING NEW CUSTOMERS WHO LIVE OUTSIDE OF THE CITY, THAT REALLY MEETS THIS PROGRAM'S SCOPES AND OBJECTIVES. SO, AS FOR THE BUDGET ALLOCATION, IN RECENT YEARS, THE STUDY SHOWS THE RETAIL SALES SLOWS DOWN AFTER THE SUM AND HER RIGHT BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR HOLIDAY SEASON, SO IT WOULD BE A GREAT TIME TO INFUSE 100 THOUSAND DOLLARS FUNDS INTO THIS PROGRAM SO THIS TIME IT WILL BE THE DOUBLE AMOUNT THAT WE ALLOCATED BACK IN JUNE AND WE CAN ALLOCATE FUNDS BY PHASES, FIRST 50 THOUSAND DOLLARS, THEN ANOTHER 50 THOUSAND OR IT CAN BE 30, 30 TO 40 SO THE FUNDS CAN STRETCH OUT LONGER AND EXPAND TOWARDS THE END OF THE YEAR. SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDS THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A PROPOSED RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THIS YEAR'S BUDGET TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL 100 THOUSAND DOLLARS OF ARPA FUNDS TO THIS OAKLEY COMMUNITY GIFT CARD PROGRAM, AND WITH THAT, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND ANY FEEDBACK OR QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE, PLEASE LET ME KNOW, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF STAFF? MS. HIGGINS? >> SO, IF STARTING THIS OVER, PEOPLE THAT HAVE ALREADY BOUGHT, CAN THEY BUY AGAIN BECAUSE IT'S A NEW START? >> YES, ABSOLUTELY, AND THAT'S SOMETHING ALSO WE CAN ADJUST ADMIN PLATFORM THAT ALLOWS ME TO ADJUST WHETHER WE WANT TO DO IT ONE PER PERSON OR TWO MORE OR MORE THAN TWO, SO IT REALLY DEPENDS ON YOUR PREFERENCE HOW WE WANT TO SET IT UP. >> I LIKE THE BUY ONE, GET ONE, I THOUGHT THAT WAS REALLY COOL. I HAVE A CARD TIME WITH KNOWING MY BALANCE OR HOW TO FIND THE BALL LAN ON IT AND PEOPLE HAVE SAID TO ME, WHERE DO YOU GET THE BALANCE, I SAID, WELL, IF I TURN IT IN AND IT DOESN'T WORK, I KNOW I DON'T HAVE MONEY LEFT ON IT. >> YES, YOU HAVE TO LOG IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE SUFFICIENT AMOUNT RIGHT BEFORE YOU PURCHASE CERTAIN ITEMS AND THERE IS NO WAY TO FIND OTHERWISE. >> SO, NO 800 NUMBER TO CALL AND LISTEN TO YOUR BALANCE? >> YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM E-MAIL YOU YOUR AMOUNT PERIODICALLY BUT I'M NOT QUITE SURE HOW OFTEN THEY DO THAT, BASICALLY YOU HAVE TO KNOW YOUR E-MAIL AND THE PASSWORD WHEN YOU SET UP THE CARD AND THAT'S PRETTY MUCH THE ONLY WAY THAT YOU KNOW THE AMOUNT THAT YOU HAVE. >> ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. >> MS. WILLIAMS? >> I WOULD LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO ALREADY BOUGHT IT TO NOT BE ABLE TO TO BECAUSE I COULDN'T GET THERE QUICK ENOUGH TO GET IT, SO I WAS ANNOYED WITH MYSELF, YOU SHOWED THE FEEDBACK, ARE HAVE WE DEFTLY SOLICITED THE SPECIFIC PLACES THAT WE'VE INCORPORATED IN THIS AND HAVE THEY SHOWN YOU, I MEAN I SAW ALL THE DATA OBVIOUSLY, BUT HAVE THE OWNERS TOLD YOU WHAT IT'S DONE FOR THEIR BUSINESS SPECIFICALLY OR IS IT JUST THOSE FEW COMMENTS THAT WERE IN THERE? >> WE DO HAVE SPECIFIC DATA BUT FOR THE QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK PURPOSE THAT WE JUST E-MAILED -- DID THE BLAST E-MAIL TO ALL THE BUSINESS OWNERS AND AMAZINGLY, WE RECEIVED A LOT OF POSITIVE FEEDBACK, ALL OF THEM WERE POSITIVE. >> AND THEN ARE WE SENDING THAT DATA TO HELP ATTRACT PEOPLE WHO WERE SLOW TO ADOPT? >> YES, AND I CONTINUE TO SOLICIT AS I ENCOUNTER THOSE OTHER BUSINESS OWNERS AND I'M REALLY HOPING TO HIT THE 50 LOCATION GOAL BUT IT MIGHT TAKE TIME. >> ALRIGHT, ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? ALRIGHT, DELIBERATIONS? ALRIGHT, PLEASE COME FORWARD, LET US KNOW WHO YOU ARE AND SAY YOUR PIECE. >> MY NAME'S JAMES GEARING, I RESIZE AT 660 WALNUT DRIVE IN OAKLEY, I'M CURIOUS, IS THIS PROGRAM THE 100 FUNDED BY THE CITY THEN, THE MATCHING, WHERE IS IT COMING FROM? >> SO, THIS IS FUNDS THAT WE RECEIVED, IS IT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. >> FEDERAL ARPA FUNDS? >> YES. >> THEY'RE ALL TAXPAYER DOLLARS. >> DURING AN INFLATIONARY PERIOD, WE'RE THROWING MORE MONEY BUT IT'S TO ENCOURAGE SHOPPING IN OAKLEY, IS THAT CORRECT, IS THERE ANY LIMITATION ON WHAT A GIFT CARD CAN BE USED FOR? SO IT HAS TO BE A PARTICIPATING LOCATION? OKAY, THANK YOU. >> I KNEW THAT, IT HAS TO BE IN OAKLEY, WE LAY THOSE PARAMETERS WHEN WE APPROVED THE PROGRAM, AND THE COMPANY HAS TO OPT IN AND THEN IT'S GOODS OR SERVICES SO I KNOW THERE IS BEAUTY SUPPLY AND RESTAURANT AND IS HARDWARE STORES, IT RUNS THE GAMETE. >> VERY GOOD, I'M LOOKING INTO IT, THANK YOU. >> ANYBODY ELSE? GOING INTO DELIBERATIONS, DISCUSSIONS? >> MOVE APPROVAL. >> SECOND. >> ALRIGHT, A FIRST AND A SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> OPPOSED OR FASTENINGS? NONE, IT'S UNANIMOUS. >> MAYOR, IF I MAY, STEVE BURDO FROM ANIMAL SERVICES IS HERE. >> OKAY, THEN WE WILL CIRCLE BACK TO 1.6 WHICH IS THE UPDATE FROM CONTRA COSTA ANIMAL SERVICES. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR POPE, IT'S MY PLEASURE TO BE HERE TONIGHT, I APOLOGIZE FOR BEING TARDY, I WAS AT MY DESK PREPARED TO DO THIS PRESENTATION VIA ZOOM AND REALIZED THERE'S NO ZOOM LINK HERE, SO I GOT OVER HERE AS QUICKLY AND SAFELY AS I COULD AND I'M HAPPY TO BE HERE TO PRESENT THIS UPDATE, MY NAME'S STEVE BURDO T PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FOR CONTRA COSTA ANIMAL SERVICES AGENCY, IT'S BEEN A WHILE DUE TO THE PANDEMIC SINCE WE'VE BEEN HERE THE PROVIDE AN UPDATE SO I'M SILTED TO BE HERE TONIGHT AND GO THROUGH THIS DEPARTMENTAL UPDATE, AS YOU KNOW, WE'VE RECENTLY BEGUN THE NEW AGREEMENT WITH OUR CITIES AND WE'RE JUST ABOUT A MONTH INTO THAT, WITHOUT FURTHER ADIEU, IF WE COULD GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE HERE, AISLE GIVE YOU A BRIEF SYNOPSIS ABOUT OUR DEPARTMENT AND WHO WE ARE, WE HAVE A 38 THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT FACILITY IN MARTINEZ, THAT IS OUR FLAGSHIP SHELTER, WE USED TO HAVE TWO SHELTERS DUE TO THE COST BURDENS OF THE PANDEMIC, WE DID CLOSE THE SHELTER IN 2020, SO THE MARTINEZ SHELTER IS OUR ONLY LOCATION, WITHIN THAT SHELTER IN THAT FACILE, WE HAVE OUR DIVISIONS, WE HAVE OBVIOUSLY OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, THE OFFICERS YOU SEE OUT HERE IN THE FIELD, THEY'RE RESPONDING TO STRAY ANIMALS, TAKING BITE INVESTIGATIONS, DOING INHUMANE INVESTIGATIONS AND KEEPING THE PEOPLE SAFE SO, WHEN THE ANIMALS COME INTO OUR SHELTER, WE HAVE A TEAM TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE FED, WATERED, TAKING THEM OUT, DOING BEHAVIOR EVALUATIONS, SO ON AND SO FORTH, IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE ALSO HAVE OUR MEDICAL TEAM, WE HAVE TWO VETS ON STAFF, WE HAVE ANOTHER NUMBER OF VETS WE CONTRACT WITH, WE HAVE REGISTERED VETERINARY TECHNICIANS WHICH ARE NURSES FOR VETERINARIANS, A NUMBER OF THEM ON STAFF AND THEN VETERINARY ASSISTANTS WHO HELP TRANSPORT THE ANIMALS FROM SURGERY BACK TO THEIR KENNEL TO MONITOR THEM AFTER SURGERY AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. WE HAVE OUR CLERICAL DIVISION AND OUR ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION WHICH THEY'RE THE FRONT LINE IF YOU COME INTO OUR FACILITY, YOU COULD COME INTO OUR SHELTER, YOU COULD CALL US, THEY'RE GOING TO BE THE FIRST PEOPLE YOU TALK TO, THEY'RE OUR FIRST LINE OF CUSTOMER SERVICE AND WE THINK THEY DO A GOOD JOB AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, WE HAVE OUR VOLUNTEER DIVISION WHICH VOLUNTEERS IN OUR SHELTER PLAY A HUMONGOUS ROLE, THEY PROVIDE THE ENRICHMENT FOR THE ANIMALS THAT ARE IN OUR CARE, THEY DO THE WALKING OF THE DOGS, PLAYING WITH THEM, THEY WILL SOCIALIZE THE CATS AND THEY ARE OUR ADOPTION COUNSELORS, SO IF YOU COME INTO THE SHELTER TO ADOPT,, YOU'RE GOING TO BE TALKING TO A VOLUNTEER THAT WILL WALK YOU THROUGH EVERYTHING THEY KNOW ABOUT THE ANIMAL AND HOPEFULLY SENDING YOU HOME WITH YOUR NEW FAMILY MEMBER. THESE LAST TWO SLIDES WERE FROM A DOCUMENT WE CREATED FOR ALL OF OUR CONTRACT CITIES, THIS IS SOMETHING YOU COULD HAND TO YOUR RESIDENTS THAT'S SPECIFICALLY TO OAKLEY AND WHAT WE DO HERE ON THE FRONT, WE GIVE THAT SYNOPSIS OF WHO WE ARE AS AN AGENCY, IN THE BACK HERE, WE PROVIDE OUR LIST OF SERVICE AND IS WE SPLIT THEM INTO TWO CATEGORIES, WE HAVE OUR PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES, EVERYTHING FROM STRAY ANIMAL PATROLS, BITE INVESTIGATIONS, INHUMANE INVESTIGATIONS, DECEASED ANIMAL RETRIEVAL, SO ON AND SO FORTH, OUR COMMUNITY SERVICES SUCH AS OUR LOW COST SPAY AND NEUTER CLINIC, OUR LOW COST VACCINATION CLINIC, OUR PROGRAMS FOR COMMUNITY CATS AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND THEN WE HAVE THERE -- THIS IS ON THE LEFT SIDE THERE, THERE IS -- IT'S QUESTION WE GET A LOT IS HOW MUCH DO WE PAY FOR ANIMAL SERVICES AND AS YOU KNOW, ANIMAL SERVICES, THE AGREEMENT IS SET UP VIA A PER CAPITA RATE, THE NEW PER CAPITA RATE IS $6.97 PER CAPITA, AND THAT IS JUST BEING TRANSPARENT, LETTING PEOPLE KNOW WHAT THEY'RE INDIVIDUALLY PAYING FOR ANIMAL SERVICES AND THEN OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, REALLY ACCELERATED DUE TO THE PANDEMIC, WE'VE PUT A LOT OF OUR SERVICES ONLINE THAT YOU USED TO HAVE TO CALL US FOR OR COME INTO THE SHELTER, NOW YOU COULD REPORT DECEASED ANIMALS ONLINE, YOU COULD JUST TELL US WHERE IT IS AND WE'RE GOING TO COME OUT AND GET IT, YOU COULD REGISTER ADOPTIONS ONLINE, YOU COULD DO YOUR LICENSING ONLINE, YOU CAN FILE NOISE COMPLAINTS ONLINE, WE MOVED A LOT OF THAT OUT OF OUR CALL CENTER AND ONLINE, THAT CLEARED UP OUR CALL CENTER TO DEAL WITH A LOT OF THE MORE SERIOUS CALLS THAT ARE COMING IN, EMERGENCY CALLS FOR ANIMAL RESCUES OR INHUMANE SITUATIONS OR JUST HELPING PEOPLE FIG WONDERING OUT HOW TO NAVIGATE THE PROCESSES OF LICENSING THEIR ANIMAL OR DOING SOMETHING MORE MUNDANE LIKE THAT. SO, WE'VE ADDED THAT THERE, ALL THE SERVICES THAT WE HAVE ON OUR WEBSITE AND THEN WE ADDED A QR CODE, IF YOU CLICK ON THAT, IF YOU PUT YOUR CAMERA OVER THAT QR CODE AND YOU CLICK ON IT, IT'S GOING TO TAKE YOU TO OUR ADOPTABLE ANIMALS PAGE, WE ALWAYS LIKE TO PROMOTE THOSE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, WE HAVE OVER 100 ANIMALS AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION IN OUR SHELTER RIGHT NOW, SINCE THE PANDEMIC'S BEEN RECITING AND THINGS ARE OPENING UP MORE FULLY, WE'RE SEEING MORE ANIMALS COME INTO THE SHELTER AND WE'RE ALSO SEEING LUCKILY MORE ADOPTIONS SO THAT'S BEEN A REALLY GOOD THING. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. SO, I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT KIND OF THE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE MOST COMMON IN OAKLEY AND THOSE YEAR OVER YEAR, THESE ARE THE TOP THREE ACTIVITIES IN OAKLEY, STRAY ANIMAL ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE AGGRESSIVE STRAY ANIMALS, CONFINED STRAY ANIMALS AND STRAY ANIMAL PATROL, INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE BITE INVESTIGATIONS AND INHUMANE INVESTIGATIONS AND DECEASED ANIMAL ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE PICKING UP DECEASED AND WILD DOMESTIC ANIMALS. SO, AS YOU COULD SEE, THIS IS YEAR TO DATE HERE, TOTAL ACTIVITIES FOR THE CITY OF OAKLEY ARE 487, AS YOU CAN SEE, THOSE TOP THREE ACTIVITIES ARE THE LION'S SHARE OF EVERYTHING WE'RE DOING HERE IN OAKLEY AND AGAIN, AS WE LOOK AT THOSE YEAR OVER YEAR OVER YEAR, THEY ARE CONSISTENTLY THE SAME, SOMETIMES ON THE OTHER ACTIVITIES OR RESCUE ACTIVITIES, ONE OF THOSE MAY JUMP OVER THE OTHER BUT YOUR TOP THREE ACTIVITIES ARE ALWAYS STRAY INVESTIGATION AND DECEASED ANIMAL RETRIEVALS, SO I WANTED TO GO OVER THE NEW AGREEMENT AND BEGINNING ON JULY 1, AND IF WE COULD GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, I'LL DETAIL THE OLD AGREEMENT WAS BASICALLY NOT EVEN A PAGE LONG AND IT WAS VERY VOID OF ANY REAL DETAIL ABOUT WHAT IT IS OUR DEPARTMENT DID OR WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHICH THAT AMBIGUITY WOULD CAUSE QUESTIONS BETWEEN CITY STAFF OR OUR DEPARTMENT OR COUNCILMEMBERS AND OUR OFFICERS, SO WE WANTED TO PUT IN PLACE A NEW AGREEMENT THAT'S VERY DETAILED AND PROVIDES THE SPECIFICS ABOUT WHAT WE DO, SO THE NEW AGREEMENT PROVIDES MUCH GREATER DETAIL REGARDING THE SERVICE LEVELS INCLUDING DETAIL THING SPECIFIC SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THE AGREEMENT FOR ALL AREAS OF OPERATION, CREATING ACCOUNTABILITY BY LISTING TARGET RESPONSE TIMES FOR EACH ACTIVITY TYPE, DEFINING WHAT IS COVERED UNDER DECEASED ANIMAL SERVICES, DESCRIBING WHICH SERVICES ARE NOT INCLUDED UNDER THE AGREEMENT AND CODIFYING PERFORMANCE REPORTING WITHIN THE AGREEMENT INCLUDING AN ANNUAL REVIEW AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT ALMOST EVERY CITY MANAGER AND POLICE CHIEF WHEN WE WERE WORKING TOWARDS A NEW AGREEMENT HAD EXPRESSED THEY WANTED. SO, THE NEW AGREEMENT INCLUDES A DIFFERENT FEE STRUCTURE THAN IN PREVIOUS YEARS, IN PREVIOUS YEARS, IT WOULD JUST SET BY THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX, THE CPI, THIS WENT TO A MORE STRUCTURED FEE INCREASE MODEL, SO FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR, FISCAL YEAR 22-23, THE COST PER CAPITA IS 797 FOR EACH PERSON RESIDING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, FOR FISCAL YEAR 23-24, IT'S GOING TO BE $9.11 FOR EACH PERSON RESIDING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND TO EXPLAIN THAT, THERE WAS A POO PERIOD OF TIME DURING THE ECONOMIC RECESSION BACK IN 2008 WHERE THE CPI INCREASE WAS PLACED ON HOLD, THERE WAS NO FORMAL PROCESS TO SAY WHEN THEY WERE GOING TO REINSTATE THAT, SO THERE WAS A GAP THERE FOR A BUNCH OF YEARS, AND WHAT THIS MODEL IS DOING IS MAKING UP FOR THAT GAP, AND IF WE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, YOU'LL SEE THAT IN FISCAL YEAR 24-25, WE WILL MOVE INTO A MORE EQUITABLE MODEL OF COST ALLOCATION WHICH IS SOMEWHAT OF A COST SHARING MODEL WHICH WILL BE -- WILL TAKE THE COUNTY'S BUNGED COST TO PROVIDE ANIMAL SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY IN THAT FISCAL YEAR, WILL SUBTRACT THE SUM OF ANIMAL LICENSING FEES ASK USER FEES, SO USER FEES ARE PEOPLE WHO COME THROUGH OUR SPAY AND NEUTER CLINIC OR OUR VACCINATION CLINIC AND WE WILL ALSO SUBTRACT THE BUDGETED COUNTY GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTION FOR THAT FISCAL YEAR, WE'LL DIVIDE IT BY THE POPE LACING OF ALL THE CITIES WHICH THE COUNTY PROVIDES ANIMAL SERVICES, SO THAT COULD DO ONE OF TWO THINGS, IT COULD RESULT IN A SLIGHT INCREASE OR A SLIGHT DECREASE, IF IT RESULT INS A SLIGHT DECREASE, THAT WILL BE APPLIED IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR, SO LET'S SAY WE HAD IF YOU TAKE THE NUMBERS AND WE HAD A 5 CENT PER CAPITA DECREASE IN THIS FISCAL YEAR, THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR, YOUR PER CAPITA RATE WOULD GO DOWN BY 5 CENTS, AND THEN EACH YEAR THE COUNTY WILL PREPARE A RECONCILIATION REPORT OF ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE COUNTY TO PROVIDE ANIMAL SERVICES DURING THE PRECEDING YEAR, THIS WILL ENSURE THE ANNUAL FEE PAID BY OAKLEY COVER IT IS ACTUAL COST INCURRED TO PROVIDE ANIMAL SERVICES, THE RECONCILIATION REPORT WILL BE COMPLETED AND SENT TO YOUR CITY IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR, AGAIN, ANY COST SAVINGS FOR THAT FISCAL YEAR WILL BE APPLIED TO THE FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR. SO I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT WHAT WE'RE DOING AS WE'RE INCREASING FUNDS HOW WE'RE SPENDING THAT, THAT GOES BACK INTO SERVICES, WE'RE GOING TO ADD ONE FULL TIME FIELD SERVICES SERGEANT FOR INCREASED ANIMAL SERVICES BEAT COVERAGE, IMPROVE RESPONSE TO DANGEROUS ANIMAL CASE AND IS IMPROVE PUBLIC SUPPORT AND TRAINING, WE'RE GOING TO ALSO ADD ONE FULL TIME FIELD UTILITY WORKER, FIELD UTILITY WORKERS ARE OUR STAFF WHO GO OUT AND PICK UP THE DECEASED ANIMALS, THAT IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST ACTIVITIES FOR OAKLEY, ALSO ONE OF THE BIGGEST ACTIVITIES FOR ALMOST EVERY CITY THAT WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH, SO THAT'S GOING TO ADD SOME SUPPORT THERE IN THAT AREA, THEN ON THE SHELTER END, WE'RE GOING ADD TWO FULL TIME ANIMAL CARE COORDINATORS TO ENHANCE OUR LIFESAVING PROGRAMS, SERVING OUR COUNTY RESIDENTS SUCH AS OUR PET ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OUR TRANSFER PARTNER PROGRAM AND OUR ADOPTION PROGRAM, WE WILL ADD ONE FULL TIME MEDICAL SUPERVISOR TO FOCUS ON STRENGTHENING OUR SPAY, NEUTER AND VACCINE CLINIC SERVICES AND ADD ONE FULL TIME RVT TO EXPAND TO FIVE TEN HOUR DAYS PER WEEK. AND BEFORE I CLOSE, I WANTED TO MENTION TWO THINGS, ONE OF THEM IS THAT RECENTLY WORKING WITH YOUR CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE, WE CREATED A WEB PAGE FOR YOUR WEBSITE HERE IN OAKLEY THAT DETAILS ANIMAL SERVICES, WHAT WE DO, IT LA A COPY OF THAT ONE PAGER THERE THAT PEOPLE COULD DOWN -- DOWNLOAD, WE WANT TO PROVIDE AS MUCH BY WAY OF RESOURCES ABOUT WHAT WE DO YOUR RESIDENTS, OFTENTIMES YOU THINK, WELL, ANIMAL SERVICES, THERE'S A MOOSE IN MY BACKYARD, AM I GOING TO CALL THEM, THAT'S NOT -- YOU'RE NOT GOING TO CALL US FOR THE NOOSING, YOU'RE GOING CALL ANOTHER DEPARTMENT THAT DEALS WITH THAT, THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, HOWEVER IF IT'S A DECEASED OR WILD ANIMAL, THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO CALL US FOR AND WE WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR FOR EVERYBODY AND MAKE IT EASY FOR YOUR RESIDENTS TO SEE, THE FINAL THING IS I MENTIONED EARLIER, WE'VE BEEN DOING REALLY GOOD WITH ADOPTIONS, IN JUNE OF THIS YEAR, WE DID 252 ADOPTIONS, THAT WAS THE FIRST TIME WE REACHED OVER THE 200 ADOPTION MARK SINCE DECEMBER OF 2019, SO, THINGS ARE COMING BACK, OUR VOLUNTEER DIVISION IS FULLY STAFFED AND READY TO HELP PEOPLE FIND THEIR NEW FAMILY MEMBER AND TO MAKE THAT EASIER, WE HAVE TWO FREE ADOPTION PROMOTIONS GOING ON, ONE THIS MONTH WHICH IS MBC AND TELEMUNDO CLEAR THE SHELTER MONTH AND NEXT MONTH WILL BE THE PET FOOD EXPRESS BAY AREA PET FAIR, FOR THE NEXT TWO MONTHS THROUGH THE END OF SEPTEMBER, ALL ADOPTIONS ARE FREE AT CONTRA COSTA ANIMAL SERVICES SO HOPEFULLY EVERYBODY WILL COME ON DOWN AND YOU CAN REFER THAT TO YOUR NETWORKS AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. >> QUESTIONS? MR. FULLER? >> YES, THANK YOU. IF SOMEBODY BRINGS IN SAY A CAT OR DOG OR TWO OF THEM, DO YOU ARRANGE WITH OTHER AGENCIES ALSO TO PUT OUT THAT THEY'RE AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION? >> WE DO, YES, SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF WAYS THAT THAT HAPPENS, WE HAVE OUR REGULAR ADOPTION PROMOTION WHICH IS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC THROUGH OUR WEBSITE, SOCIAL MEDIA, OUR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND VEHICLES THAT WE UTILIZE, WE ALSO HAVE OUR TRANSFER PARTNER PORTAL, OUR TRANSFER PARTNERS ARE KES CUE GROUPS IN THE COMMUNITY, SO OTHER GROUPS THAT DEAL WITH ANIMALS THAT IN THE SHELTER, TAKING THEM OUT OF THE SHELTER AND PUTTING THEM IN SOMETIMES A FOSTER ENVIRONMENT OR THEIR OWN HOMES TO FIND THEM A PLACE, A LOT OF THOSE RESCUE GROUPS FOCUS ON SPECIFIC BREEDS, SO THERE ARE CATTLE DOG BREED RESCUES, THERE ARE GERMAN SHEPPERD BREED RESCUES, WHEN ANIMALS COME INTO OUR SHELTER OR COMING UP FOR ADOPTION, THE TRANSFER PARTNERS SUBSCRIBE TO CERTAIN LISTS THAT WE AUTOMATICALLY EVERY DAY PUT OUT TO THEM SO THEY GET THE NOTICES OF THOSE ANIMALS. >> THANK YOU, NOW WHAT'S -- IF A PERSON COMES IN SAY THEY ADOPT AN UNNEUTERED MALE THAT YOU ARE UNSURE OF THE RABIES VACCINATION, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO PROVIDE FOR THE PERSON SEEKING THAT? >> THE GOOD THING ABOUT THAT IS THAT WHEN WE ADOPT AN AL MALL, WE GIVE THEM THE SPAY AND NEUTER SURGERY, REQUIRED BY LAW, WE CAN'T LET THAT ANIMAL UNLESS THERE'S A MEDICAL CONDITION LEAVE OUR SHELTER WITHOUT BEING SPAYED OR METERED AND THE SAME THING WITH THE VACCINATIONS, WE MAKE SURE THEY GET THE RABIES, BASICALLY THE BIG THREE VACCINATIONS FOR DOGS ASK CATS, WE PROVIDE THOSE, WE MAKE SURE THEY'RE MICROCHIP SO THEY COME FULLY LOADED AS WE LIKE TO CALL IT. >> TWO STATEMENTS, ONE, MY EXPERIENCE HASN'T BEEN RECENTLY CALLING AND I HEARD OTHER PEOPLE SAY THIS BUT I'VE GONE ON CALLS ABOUT DIFFERENT SITUATIONS AND I'VE BEEN THE 75TH CALL IN THE QUEUE, PLEASE HANG ON AND OTHER PEOPLE HAVE THE SAME THING, IT'S LIKE -- I KNOW THIS ANIMAL COULD PROBABLY BENEFIT BUT GETTING THROUGH, IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH, MAYBE YOU DON'T WANT ME TO SAY IT BUT I CALLED SUPERVISOR FERGUSON'S OFFICE AND SHE GETS THROUGH TO YOUR OFFICE, HAVE WE DONE ANYTHING TO ENHANCE THE CALL-IN CENTER. >> YES, I'M GLAD YOU ASKED THAT QUESTION, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE LAST TIME YOU CALLED WAS, BUT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, THAT WAIT TIME IN THE QUEUE WAS PRETTY LARGE, THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT PROMPTED US TO MOVE A LOT OF THOSE SERVICES THAT PEOPLE WERE CALLING US FOR TO ONLINE, WHEN THOSE PEOPLE CALL FOR A DECEASED ANIMAL REPORT OR TO DO A NOISE COMPLAINT, THE CALL IS MUCH LESS TIME BECAUSE WE'RE REFERRING THEM, GO TO OUR WEBSITE, FILL OUT A REPORT, IF SOMEBODY DOESN'T HAVE ACCESS TO A COMPUTER, WE'RE GOING TO HELP FILL THAT OUT FOR THEM, THAT'S BEEN WORKING AND OUR CALL VOLUME HAS REDUCED SIGNIFICANTLY, NOW IF YOU CALL, YOUR WAIT TIME IS NOT 30 MINUTES, 45 MINUTES, IT'S MORE LIKE 5-7 MINUTES. >> I'M APPRECIATIVE OF WHAT YOU'VE DONE WITH LICENSING, WITH SENIOR CITIZENS, I THINK IT'S DONE TO $5 IF IT'S THAT MUCH, AND NOT ONLY THAT, I SENT IN THE FULL AMOUNT AND THEY SENT IT BACK, NO, YOU'RE TOO OLD SO NOW YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH. >> I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED, WE TRY TO BE AS SUPPORTIVE TO THE COMMUNITY AS POSSIBLE, SO WHEN SOMEBODY IS NOT AWARE OF THOSE POLICIES AND HE DO -- OUR STAFF IS GOOD ABOUT GETTING BACK TO THEM AND SAYING, HEY, YOU OVERPAID THERE AND THE SAME THING WE'VE HAD THAT WITH A LOT OF VETERANS WHO HAVE COME IN, VETERANS GET A FREE LICENSE AND A FREE ADOPTION AND SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY IS AWARE OF THOSE THINGS AND ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THEM. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> MS. WILLIAMS? >> I KNOW YOU MENTIONED DOMESTICATED ANIMALS, BEING IN OAKLEY, WE HAVE A LOT OF LIVESTOCK, DOES THAT ALL COUNT FOR THAT, I KNOW I HAVE HORSES AND THEY'RE VERY OLD AND I STRUGGLE TO FIND A PLACE WHEN IT WAS TIME, THEIR VET WAS GREAT BUT IT'S A VERY LONG PROCESS IF YOUR HORSE HAS TO BE PUT DOWN AT YOUR PROPERTY AND THEY HAVE TO BE REMOVED SO IS THAT PART OF WHAT YOU DO AND IF SO, I THINK WE NEED TO PUBLICIZE MORE, I'VE TALKED TO HORSE OWNERS WHO LIVE IN FEAR, WE'LL PUT THEM ON A TRAILER AND DO IT, AND THAT IS NOT A GOOD WAY TO SAY GOOD-BYE TO YOUR FRIEND. >> THAT IS NOT A SERVICE WE PROVIDE, ONE OF OUR AREAS OUR DEPARTMENT DOES HANDLE IS LIVE STOCK, WE ARE DOMESTIC ANIMALS AND LIVESTOCK. IN TERMS OF BEING ABLE TO COME OUT AND PROVIDE A PUBLIC SERVICE LIKE THAT, THAT'S NOT REALLY EVEN SOMETHING WE DO FOR DOMESTIC DOG OWNER, IF THEY SAY CAN YOU COME OUT AND EUTHANIZE MY PET, WE DON'T DO THAT, THERE'S A LOT OF PRIVATE PRACTICE VETS WHO DO THAT OUT HERE, HOWEVER, WE HAVE A SIX STALL BARN AT OUR MARTINEZ FACILITY AND IT'S COMMON YU EEL FIND HORSES, SHEEP, GOATS, PIGS IN THERE, THERE WAS THE STORY A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO WHERE THE HORSES GOT LOOSE, STRAY HORSES IS A THING THAT HAPPENS BELIEVE IT OR NOT AND THERE WERE TWO THAT GOT ON THE 680, THEY SHUT DOWN MORNING COMMUTE TRAFFIC, WE WILL GO OUT AND CORAL THOSE HORSES AND GET IN CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AND JUST LIKE IF THERE WAS A STRAY DOG IN THE COMMUNITY, WE WOULD GET THAT DOG UNDER CONTROL AND BRING THEM BACK TO THE FACILITY AND CONTACT THE OWNER, THAT'S MORE WHAT WE PROVIDE IN TERMS OF LIVESTOCK, WE WILL COME OUT AND IF YOU THINK THAT IS MY FENCE LINE GOOD ENOUGH, IS THIS SHELTER GOOD ENOUGH, WE CAN PROVIDE ADVICE AND SUPPORT THAT WAY. >> IT'S THE REMOVAL, ONCE THE ANIMAL IS PUT TO SLEEP, MOST PEOPLE HAVE VETS BUT THEN LIKE SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO WAIT TWO WEEKS FOR A RENDERER TO COME OUT, SO I THINK THAT WOULD NOT NECESSARILY YOU HAVE TO DO IT BUT THE RESOURCES TO POINT PEOPLE TO, I MAD TO CALL SOMEBODY FROM SANTA ROSA BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE ANYBODY WHO COULD COME OUT IN A TIMELY MANNER, WITH YOU'RE GRIEVING YOUR HORSE, IT'S TOUGH TO MAKE THOSE PHONE CALLS SO IT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU HAD A PLACE ON YOUR WEBSITE TO POINT PEOPLE TO, HERE'S WHO CAN PROVIDE THAT SERVICE. >> I THINK THAT'S A POINT WELL TAKEN. >> ANYTHING ELSE? WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >> ALRIGHT, WE'LL PICK UP WHERE WE LEFT OFF, I BELIEVE IT'S 5.4 WHICH IS AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT, THIS IS FOR THREE PROPERTIES ON TEAKWOOD DRIVE, MR. MCMURRAY? >> THIS ITEM IS A FOLLOW-UP TO THE WORK SESSION WE HELD ON JULY 12, WE TALKED ABOUT THE CITY IS TRYING TO DISPOSE OF A FEW PARCELS, AS PAR OF THAT PROCESS, WE HAD TO FOLLOW THE SURPLUS LAND ACT AND NOTIFY AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS, THEY SUBMITTED A LETTER OF INTENT TO PURCHASE THE THREE PARCELS, THEY RANGE FROM 6 THOUSAND TO ALMOST 9 THOUSAND SQUARE FEET T THREE OF THEM, THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE IN PRICE, THEY WENT BACK AND OFFERED MORE, SO WE ARE BRINGING FORWARD AND AFTER THAT WORK SESSION, IT SEEMED THE DIRECTION WAS POSITIVE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT, THE ITEM IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT IS TO AUTHORIZE ME TO SIGN THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND TO SELL THE THREE PARCELS TO THE YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION AND THEY ARE COMMITTING TO BUILD A TOTAL OF 6 AFFORDABLE UNITS, ONE SINGLE FAMILY HOME WITH AN ATTACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ON EACH LOT, SO THAT REALLY IS THE ESSENCE OF THIS ITEM, I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND I KNOW THE YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION HAS A FEW TEAM MEMBERS TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WELL. THANK YOU. >> QUESTIONS OF STAFF? NO? ALRIGHT, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM, I HAVE TWO SPEAKER CARDS, IS IT FRANCINE? YOU'LL HAVE TO TELL ME HOW TO PRONOUNCE THE LAST NAME, COME ON UP. >> IT'S FRANCINE [INAUDIBLE], THANK YOU, I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE A QUESTION OR CONCERN THAT I LIVE ON TEAKWOOD AND I'M ALL FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND SEEP YOURS, I'M A SENIOR, I THINK IT'S JUST THE FACT THAT WE WEREN'T NOTIFIED OF ANYTHING HAPPENING ON THAT STREET AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE MY CONCERNS ARE, I MEAN, I'VE LIVED THERE FOR MANY YEARS AND WE GOT NOTICES WHEN WE WERE GOING TO HAVE A PARK ON THAT STREET ACROSS FROM US AND WE WERE INVITED TO COME HERE AND VOTE ON THINGS AND PICK APPARATUSES US FOR OUR KIDS TO PLAY ON WHICH OBVIOUSLY NEVER HAPPENED BUT THE FACT WAS WE WERE NOTIFIED, WHETHER IT WAS IN WRITING OR IN THE NEWS AND I REMEMBER GETTING MAILINGS, SO I DON'T KNOW, IT'S JUST KIND OF A LOSS TO THINK WHY WE WEREN'T INFORMED, SO THAT'S MY CONCERN. >> WE'LL HAVE STAFF ANSWER THAT AFTER THE OTHER PEOPLE SPEAK. RAY SERNUP. >> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, MY NAME IS RAY, I LIVE AT 4930 TEAKWOOD DRIVE WHICH IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE THREE PARCELS, MY CONCERN IS ONE THING, THESE ARE A HIGH VALUE SUBDIVISION, 500 THOUSAND DOLLARS PLUS HOMES, THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC ON THIS ROAD, THERE'S GOING TO BE MORE AND I'VE NEVER SEEN WHERE THEY WOULD PUT LOW INCOME IN THE MIDDLE OF A SUBDIVISION LIKE THIS. IT'S SOMETHING THAT I DON'T THINK BELONGS THERE, I HAVE SEEN THE ONES IN PITTSBURG, THEY'RE SMALLER, THEY'RE MORE MODULAR, BUT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, IT WOULDN'T FIT, WE HAVE ENOUGH HIGH DENSITY AS IT IS, WE HAVE THE SENIOR HOUSING OVER BY LUCKY SHOPPING SENT E WE HAVE APARTMENTS UP FRONT ON THE CORNER OF TEAKWOOD AND HIGHWAY 4 OR MAIN STREET, WHAT WE NEED IS REGULAR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT MATCH OURS. YOU KNOW, WE LOVE OUR SUBDIVISION, WE LOVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE LOVE THE WAY IT IS. WE DON'T -- WE REALLY DON'T WANT ANYTHING LIKE THAT OVER IN OUR AREA. IT'S GOING TO INCREASE TRAFFIC, THERE'S ENOUGH TRAFFIC AS IT IS RIGHT NOW, WE'VE ASKED FOR SPEED BUMPS, WE'VE NEVER RECEIVED ANY INFORMATION OR ANYTHING ON THAT AND ANOTHER THING THAT I HAVE LOOKED ON THE WEBSITE AND THERE IS A PROVISION ON IT THAT SAYS FUTURE PHASE COULD BE CONSTRUCTED AS SEPARATE DETACHED ADU'S ON EACH LOT IN THE REAR YARDS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER FROM 6 TO 9 FAMILIES OR LIVING AREAS IN THOSE THREE LOTS, NOW, THAT'S GOING TO INCREASE -- RECEIVE MORE TRAFFIC AND MORE CONGESTION AND I DON'T BELIEVE IT BELONGS THERE. THAT'S ALL I GOT TO SAY. >> ALRIGHT. ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? COME ON UP AND LET US KNOW WHO YOU ARE. >> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND HONORABLE CITY COUNCILMEMBERS, MY NAME IS DANA, ONE OF THE DIRECTORS OF YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION, I AM ONE OF THE BREASTED PARTIES HERE TONIGHT, WITH ME TONIGHT IS JODEE VALENTINE, OUR YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE, IN LIGHT OF THE CONCERN EXPRESSED, I WANTED TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT WE WERE INTENDING TO DO AND WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE AND WHY LOW INCOME HOUSING ISN'T EXACTLY THE RIGHT WAY TO CATEGORIZE WHAT IT IS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE, THESE ARE THREE SINGLE FAMILY LOT AND IS PROPOSING THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS SO A TOTAL OF SIX UNITS ON THREE LOTS HAS INTEGRATE INTO THIS COMMUNITY AND THE WAY WE DO IT IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT, WE'RE A PUBLIC CHARITY, SO PEOPLE THINK OF THAT AS DOING LOW INCOME HOUSING THAT LOOKS LIKE SOMETHING THAT THEY HAVE IN THEIR HEAD FROM PROBABLY THE 70'S OR 80'S, WHAT WE DO IS A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT MODEL, WE -- THE SIX BOARD OF DIRECTOR MEMBERS ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THE DENOVA HOMES EXECUTIVE TEAM, IT IS OWNED BY A CONQUERED BASED 30 PLUS YEAR HOME BUILDING COMPANY, THE SIX OF US HAVE A COMBINED 150 SOME ODD YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPING PROPERTY WE ALL HAVE PHILANTHROPIC BACKGROUNDS AND WE DECIDED TO GET TOGETHER, DAVE AND LAURIE FORMED THE FOUNDATION T SIX OF US GOT TOGETHER TO COME UP WITH A WAY O BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHOUT HAVING SOME OF THE PUBLIC RESTRICTIONS, SO OURS IS ALL PRIVATELY FUNDED AND WHAT WE DO IS WE GO OUT AND WE FIND SURPLUS LAND SO LOTS IN CITIES THAT THE CITIES NEED TO FIRST OFFER TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS AND THEN WE GO OUT TO OUR DENOVA TRADE PARTNERS AND THEY DONATE THEIR TIME AND THEIR TALENT AND THE SIX OF US DONATE OUR TIME AND WE COME UP WITH A WAY TO BUILD AT A MUCH LOWER COST. WE DO THAT SO THAT WE CAN OFFER RENT AT NO MORE THAN 30% OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR THE FAMILY'S INCOME, SO THEIR RENT IS FIXED, IF THEIR JOB CHANGES, IF THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE, THEY KNOW THAT THEIR HOUSING IS SAFE, IT'S SECURE. TO DO THAT, YOU WOULD THINK WE WOULD BE BUILDING PERHAPS A LESSER PRODUCT BUT WE DON'T BECAUSE SO MUCH IS DONATED, WE DID JUST BUILD THE PITTSBURG PROJECT, IF YOU HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO TAKE A LOOK AND TALK TO THE CITY OF PIT BURG, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO SO, WE BUILT IT FOR 200 THOUSAND DOLLARS A DOOR, FOR COMPARISON, THE CURRENT REPORTED FIGURES FOR ONE AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT EXCEEDS 650 THOUSAND DOLLARS A DOOR, SO OUR COST, OUR DIRECT COSTS GO WAY DOWN BECAUSE WE LEVERAGE THE TRADE PARTNER RELATIONSHIPS WE HAVE BASED ON THE PHILANTHROPIC COMMUNITY WE TEND TO DO BUSINESS WITH, THAT GIVES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO KEEP THOSE RENTS LOW BUT STILL KEEP THAT PRODUCT LOOKS LIKE WHAT IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE IN A SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY, SO I SEE THAT THE CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE IS UP ON THE SCREEN, WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT HIGH DENSITY AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HARDWORKING FAMILIES, THE FAMILIES THAT ARE IN PITTSBURG INCLUDE A TEACHER, AN ADMINISTRATOR FOR A CITY, WE HAVE A SECURITY GUARD, THESE ARE FAMILIES THAT THEY'RE WORKING FAMILIES, THEY HAD SOME OF THEM, SOME REALLY HARD TIMES IN THE PAST, PERHAPS SOME MEDICAL ISSUES, PERHAPS A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SITUATION THAT FORCED THEM TO LEAVE WITH NOTHING, AND GETTING BACK ON YOUR FEET AND HAVING THAT STABLE HOUSING IS NEAR IMPOSSIBLE AFTER THAT, SO WE DO SOMETHING JUST A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT IN TERMS OF HOW WE GET THE MODEL TO WORK AND THEN WE STABILIZE THEIR RENT AND THEN THERE'S A LENGTH OF TIME THEY'RE LIMITED TO IN THE UNIT BECAUSE THE IDEA IS WE'RE GIVING THEM TIME TO STABILIZE, THEY'RE WORKING, THEY HAVE JOBS, THEY ARE WANTING TO GET TO THE NEXT STOP IN THEIR LIFE, WE'RE JUST HELPING TO BRIDGE THAT GAP WHICH DOESN'T EXIST TRULY IN THE MARKET, SO WITH THAT, I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE BUT HOPEFULLY THAT GIVES SOME ASSURANCE THAT THE PROGRAM WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ISN'T QUITE LIKE WHAT HAS BEEN TRADITIONALLY CONSIDERED LOW INCOME HOUSING AND MAYBE GIVES PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF ASSURANCE THAT THIS IS A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT MODEL DESIGNED TO FIT INTO THAT COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. >> I JUST WANTED TO -- I UNDERSTAND THE PROGRAM BUT MAYBE FOR THE BENEFIT OF OTHERS THAT MAY NOT HAVE HEARD IT, LIKE YOU GUYS MANAGE IT, RIGHT? >> WE DO. >> CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT. >> YEAH, SO WE HAVE A PORTFOLIO INDEPENDENT OF YELLOW ROOF, WE HAVE A PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TEAM THAT MANAGES OUR PROPERTIES AND THEN WE HAVE THE YELLOW ROOF PORTFOLIO, IN HOUSE, WE HANDLE ALL OF THE MANAGEMENT, JODEE TAKES THE PHONE CALLS, MEET WIDTHS THE RESIDENTS, BY WAY OF EXAMPLE, TODAY JODIE, SHE WAS OUT AT THE VILLAGE DOING ALL OF THE BACK OF SCHOOL SUPPLY DOUGH DOE NATIONS FOR THAT COMMUNITY, THEY MOVED IN, IN APRIL, THEY ARE STILL GETTING THEIR FEET UNDER THEM, THERE WAS A DONATION DRIVE AND ALL OF THEIR SCHOOL SUPPLIES GOT DELIVERED TODAY AND SHE CHECKED IN ON ALL OF THEM, I GOT ONE QUESTION BECAUSE I WAS ARRANGING FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOR ONE OF THE KIDS, SHE GOES AND TALKS WITH THEM AND WE MANAGE NOT ONLY THE THE PROPERTY BUT ALSO THEY GET FINANCIAL TRAINING SO THERE ARE CLASSES TO HELP THEM IN PARTNERING WITH THE SAME PEOPLE WHO DO OUR FINANCING FOR OUR HOME BUYING, THOSE ARE THE PARTNERS THAT ARE HELPING THEM WITH FINANCIAL TRAINING SO THEY CAN GET WAN K ACCOUNTS SET UP AGAIN AND GET SAVING ACCOUNTS SET UP SO ALL OF THAT HAPPENS, SO BOTH THE PHYSICAL AND THE OTHER SERVICES ALL HAPPEN THROUGH US DIRECTLY OUT OF OUR OFFICE IN CONCORD WHERE JODEE SITS EVERY DAY TAKING THE CALLS, ANYTHING THAT'S NEEDED. SO, YEAH, SO WE HANDLE THAT PERSONALLY. >> MS. WILLIAMS? >> SO, I WAS SURPRISED AT SOME OF THE PUSH-BACK, I SHOULDN'T BE BUT I WAS SURPRISED AT SOME OF THE PUSH BACK THAT CAME SO I WOULD LOVE JUST LIKE COUNCILMEMBER HIGGINS JUST SAID TO EXPAND A LITTLE BIT, ONE, HOW DO YOU ALL EVEN SELECT, SIX SEEMS VERY MINUSCULE FOR OUR COMMUNITY WHICH I UNDERSTAND, I WOULD LOVE FOR IT TO GO TO THE NINE AND FIND OTHER PLACES AS WELL, SORRY PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO DON'T LIKE THAT, SO HOW DO YOU SELECT, AND TWO, SO WE'VE HEARD THAT IT'S A THREE YEAR LEASE TERM AND EVERYBODY SAYS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY DON'T LEAVE, SO, I WOULD LOVE IF YOU COULD JUST ADDRESS THAT FOR PEOPLE'S CONCERNS SO THEY UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING TO GIVE PEOPLE SORT OF THAT HELPING HAND UP. >> SO, WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE LAW WHEN IT COMES TO RENTALS, RIGHT, SO WE HAVE A RENTAL APPLICATION THAT IS STANDARD, IT'S APPROVED BY OUTSIDE COUNSEL, I HAVEN'T DONE LAN LORD TENANT LAW IN A LONG TIME, SO WE HAVE A SPECIALTY FIRM THAT MAKES SURE WE'RE UP TO DATE ON EXACTLY WHO WE RENT TO AND HOW WE TAKE IN APPLICATIONS SO WE FOLLOW ALL THE LAW AND IS WE HAVE PARTNER INS THE COMMUNITY WE GO OUT TO, SO ONE OF THE PARTNERS WE'VE USED IN THE PAST IS THERE IS A COORDINATOR FOR HOMELESS SERVICES, THAT WAS THE COORDINATOR WE WOULD SAY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE UNITS, PLEASE TELL ALL OF THE FOLKS THAT YOU KNOW WHO MIGHT NEED THESE SERVICES AND THEY SUBMIT AN APPLICATION, THERE ARE STANDARD QUALIFICATIONS THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO MEET, WE HAVE SOME OF THE SAME POLICIES ASK ADDENDUM TOS THE LEASE, THERE ARE THINGS YOU CAN'T DO IN THE SAME WAY YOU WERE RENTING IN A TYPICAL RENTAL COMMUNITY, A MARKET RATE RENTAL COMMUNITY, THERE ARE RULES AND REGULATIONS, YOU HAVE TO SIGN ON THAT YOU'RE GOING TO ABIDE BY ALL OF THEM, SO, ALL OF THE BEHAVIORS THAT ARE PROHIBITED IN A TYPICAL RENTAL COMMUNITY, THEY'RE PROHIBITED IN THIS RENTAL COMMUNITY, WE TAKE IN THE APPLICATIONS AND WE FOLLOW, IT'S THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY'RE RECEIVED SO WE GO THROUGH AND WE LOOK AT THE APPLICATIONS AND IF THEY'RE QUAL IF I HAD, WE PLACE THEM IN A UNIT. AND THEN ONCE THEY'RE PLACED IN A UNIT, WE ARE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR ADDITIONAL PROVIDERS TO HELP TO BUILD UP THE LIST OF PEOPLE WHO NEED UNITS BECAUSE WE'RE BUILDING IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS NR, THE SAME WAY WE'RE PURSUING SURPLUS LAND HERE, WE HAVE THREE OTHER PROJECT WES EAR LOOKING AT, AT THE SAME TIME, SIX AMOUNTS ISN'T ENOUGH, NINE UNITS ISN'T ENOUGH BUT WE'RE DOING THEM IN SMALL GROUPS BECAUSE THEY ARE 100% PRIVATELY FUNDED, SO RIGHT NOW, DOING OVER THE FIRST FEW YEARS, DOING FIVE PROJECTS OF SIX UNITS EACH WE FEEL LIKE IS A GOOD AMOUNT AND ALSO THOSE SMALLER UNITS, JODIE'S MANAGING THEM PERSONALLY SO WE LIKE THAT THEY'RE LOCAL AND THAT WE CAN GET TO THEM TWICE A DAY IF WE NEED TO AND THAT'S WHAT SHE DID TODAY, TWICE A DAY TO DROP OFF WHAT'S NEEDED AND TO BE THERE, SO, IT'S THE LONG WAY OF SAYING WE'RE FOLLOWING THE LAW BUT IT'S VERY SPECIFIC IN WHAT WE CAN AND CONDITION DO AND IT'S RESTRICTIVE IN WHAT THEY CAN AND CONDITION DO. >> ALRIGHT, SO SOME OF OUR PUBLIC SPEAKERS BROUGHT UP SOME ISSUES AND BETWEEN THE TWO OF YOU, I IMAGINE WE CAN GET THE ANSWERS, THE QUESTION WAS ABOUT THE NOTIFICATION OF PROJECTS. THIS ONE'S NOT A PROJECT YET. >> THIS IS NOT A PROJECT, WE DEPARTMENT DO ANY FORMAL NOTIFICATION, IF YOU CONSTRUCT ONE SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON ONE SINGLE FAMILY LOT, THAT WOULDN'T REQUIRE A NOTIFICATION, THAT DOESN'T REQUIRE A COUNCIL OR PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM, THAT ACTION, THESE HOMES WOULD BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT A STAFF LEVEL BUT I KNOW DENOVA WORK WIDTHS THE COMMUNITY AND YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION, I BELIEVE THEY WILL BE NOTIFYING THE RESIDENTS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE GOOD NEIGHBORS. >> OKAY. THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT AGE RESTRICTION. HEARING YOU TALK, IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE THERE WILL BE ANY AGE RESTRICTION. >> NO, THIS IS NOT PLANNED TO BE AGE RESTRICTED AT THIS POINT WHICH IS NOT TO SAY THAT WE CAN'T HAVE -- IF OUR CONTACT IN OAKLEY F THE CITY SAID, HEY, WE HAVE THIS GREAT LIST OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ALL 65 AND ABOVE OR 55 AND ABOVE WHO ARE HOMELESS AND WE'D LOVE FOR YOU TO USE THIS COORDINATOR TO HELP FILL THE SPOTS, WE LIKE TO FILL THE NEED IN THAT COMMUNITY, IF THERE IS A NO NEED, JUST SEND PEOPLE ARE WAY, SEND PEEP JODIE'S WAY BECAUSE SHE DOES FIELD THOSE CALLS EVERY DAY, SO SHE CAN CERTAINLY PUT THEM ON AN INTEREST LIST IN THE SAME WAY WE WOULD FOR ONE OF THE HOMES WE WERE SELLING AND LET THEM KNOW AS SOON AS THE APPLICATION IS AVAILABLE. >> WE LOVE OUR SENIORS IN OAKLEY, THEY CONTRIBUTED THEIR WHOLE LIVES, IT'S GOOD THAT WE HELP TAKE CARE OF THEM AS WELL. >> ABSOLUTELY. >> THERE WAS ANOTHER QUESTION ABOUT TRAFFIC, SO IT'S -- >> THESE PARCELS ARE DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL IN OUR GENERAL PLAN, RESIDENTIAL IN OUR ZONING MAP, THE THREE UNITS WOULD BE A NOMINAL NUMBER OF NEW CAR TRIPS, EACH SINGLE FAMILY HOME IS ONE NEW PEAK HOUR TRIP SO YOU'RE LOOKING AT THREE PEAK HOUR TRIPS FOR THESE THREE HOMES WITH THE ATTACHED ADU, SO THERE REALLY IS NO IMPACT BECAUSE THE GENERAL IMPACT AND THE ZONING ASSUME AND THERE WOULD BE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THESE PARCELS. >> THERE WAS A COMMENT ABOUT SPEED BUMPS, TRAFFIC CALMING. >> WE HAVE A TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM, IF THE RESIDENTS -- AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH THAT PROCESS BEFORE, THEY'RE WELCOME TO REACH BACK OUT TO OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE WAS SOME TIME BETWEEN THE LAST TIME THEY SPOKE WITH US BUT WE'RE HAPPY TO WALK THROUGH THAT PROCESS AGAIN. >> AND YOU DIDN'T SAY HOW LONG AGO WHAT THEY'RE ASKING, I DON'T SEE WHERE YOU'RE SITTING FOR THE TRAFFIC REVIEW, IF YOU COULD GO ON OUR CITY DEPARTMENT THROUGH OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, THERE IS A PROGRAM SPECIFICALLY DIEPPE TO EVALUATE STREETS FOR TRAFFIC CALMING AND SPEED BUMPS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, IT'S A COUPLE OF YEARS OLD, A NEW PROGRAM. >> WE'VE HAD IT IN PLACE FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND IT'S BEEN USED BY MANY NEIGHBORHOODS, SOMETIMES THERE ARE TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES THAT ARE WARRANTED AND SOMETIMES THERE'S NOT, SO IT DEPENDS ON WHAT THE DATA SHOWS. >> SOMETIMES BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE STREET, WE'RE LIMITED IN WHAT WE CAN PUT IN, SO THEY HAVE TO LOOK AT ALL THAT. THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT A THIRD UNIT PER PARCEL, A SEPARATE ADU IN THE BACKYARD I GUESS DETACHED? >> YEAH, SO UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, THAT WOULD BE I GUESS THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE, BUT OUR CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE HAS TWO UNITS PER LOT BASED ON THE PLANS WE CURRENTLY HAVE DRAWN, SO I GUESS WE COULD TALK TO STAFF ABOUT THAT IF SOMEBODY WANTED MORE UNITS, IT SOUNDS LIKE THE RESIDENTS DO NOT WANT MORE UNITS AND WHAT WE HAVE PLANNED IS SIX UNITS TOTAL ON THREE LOTS. >> YEAH, IT'S PRETTY DENSE NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY, IF YOU'VE DRIVEN DOWN THERE AND LOOKED FOR A PARKING SPOT, YOU KIND OF KNOW. ALRIGHT, SO THAT WAS ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAD, WAS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WHO WANTED TO SPEAK FROM THE COMMUNITY? COME ON UP, LET US KNOW WHO YOU ARE, IF WE NEED ANOTHER QUESTION, WE CAN CALL YOU BACK UP. >> MY NAME IS JERRY SWARTZ, I'M ALSO A FELLOW RESIDENT OF OAKLEY AND IX ALL OF YOU GUYS LIVE IN OAKLEY, YOU ALL LIVE IN OAKLEY, ALL YOU GUYS? YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE INITIAL BOARD MEETING, YOU MENTIONED YOU HAD WORK GROUPS CONCERNING THE SALE OF THESE PROPERTIES, WAS THE RESIDENTS INVITED TO THAT OR IS THAT SOMETHING THAT DIDN'T HAVE TO HAPPEN, WERE THEY? WAS THERE ONE? >> IT WAS DURING A CITY COUNCIL MEETING IF I REMEMBER RIGHT. >> WAS IT, SO -- >> WHEN WAS THAT? >> JULY 12TH. >> JULY 12TH -- >> LAST MONTH. >> YEAH, I'M JUST LIKE THE GAL THAT SPOKE, THIS IS NEW TO US, YOU KNOW, AS BEING RESIDENTS, WE'VE BEEN THERE FOR 40 YEARS RIGHT THERE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, SO THIS IS JUST NEW, WHEN I ASKED ABOUT THE WORK GROUP, I WAS WONDERING IF WE COULD GET IN ON ANOTHER ONE OR IF THIS PROCESS IS ACTUALLY ESCALATED TO THE POINT WHERE THIS DEAL IS GOING TO BE DONE. IS THAT WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE? >> WE CAN ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS WHEN YOU'RE DONE. >> OKAY. YOU KNOW, THE OTHER THING I HAVE IS I WAS JUST WONDERING AS A COMMITTEE IF YOU GUYS PONDERED THE FACT OF THE CHANGE IN OUR PROPERTY VALUE FOR THE NUMEROUS HOME OWNERS IN THAT SUBDIVISION, I WAS JUST WONDERING IF YOU COULD ANSWER THAT AS WELL. AND I ALSO WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU TO GROUP, THE YELLOW ROOF GROUP FOR THE GREAT STUFF YOU'RE DOING AND JUST I'M NEGLIGENT NOT BEING AT -- I GUESS YOU HAD ONE WORK GROUP, SO, YEAH, SO THAT -- I WOULD JUST WANT TO ECHO THE FACT OF THE OTHER RESIDENTS THAT JUST OUR INITIAL REACTION IS IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THE THINGS THAT REALLY EVERYBODY HAS STATED, SO THAT'S IT AND I HOPE THAT THERE'S MORE WORK GROUPS CONCERNING THIS ISSUE. THANK YOU. >> ALRIGHT. SO, THE QUESTION ABOUT WORK GROUPS OR PUBLIC MEETINGS, SO AT THIS STAGE, TO GIVE THE AUDIENCE BACKGROUND INFORMATION T CITY OWNS THIS PARCEL AND WE DETERMINED THAT THE CITY WASN'T GOING TO USE IT FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE SO IT'S SURPLUS, WE'RE GOING TO SELL IT, CALIFORNIA STATE LAW IF WE'RE GOING TO SELL ANY OF OUR PROPERTY SAYS YOU FIRST HAVE TO GIVE IT TO LOW INCOME HOUSING ADVOCATES, AFFORDABLE HOUSING GETS FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL BEFORE WE COULD SELL IT TO ANYBODY ELSE WHICH IS WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE, RIGHT, AND THE MERE SALE OF THE PROPERTY ISN'T LIKE A PLANNING ITEM WHERE THERE WOULD BE NOTIFICATIONS SENT OUT AND BUILDING PLANS REVIEWED, THAT STUFF'S COMING, RIGHT NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CITY SELLING THE PROPERTY. I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF PROPERTY VALUES OF OTHER PROJECTS, NEIGHBORHOODS AND PROJECTS WHERE YOU HAVE EXPERIENCE. >> YEAH, SO THE IDEA IS WE'RE BUILDING SOMETHING THAT LOOKS LIKE AND FITS IN WITH THE COMMUNITY, THE FACT THAT WE ARE ABLE TO BUILD FOR A LESSER COST WHICH ALLOWS US UNDER OUR MODEL BECAUSE WE HAVE DONATED PRIVATE DONATIONS THAT MAKE THAT POSSIBLE, THAT DOESN'T CHANGE THE VALUE OF THE HOME THAT'S THERE OR THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. THE ONLY THING THAT IT DOES IS BECAUSE OF OUR PRIVATE FUNDING, WE'RE ALLOWED TO -- WE HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO LOWER THE RENT BUT THE HOMES ARE STILL GOING TO BE WELL CONSTRUCTED, HIGH QUALITY HOMES WHEREAS IT COSTS CALIFORNIA 650 THOUSAND DOLLARS A DOOR ON AVERAGE, IT COSTS US 2, SCALE THAT TO THE SIZE OF THE UNITS, SCALE THAT TO THE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ASK YOU GET THE SENSE WE'RE DOING IT LESS EXPENSIVELY TO ALLOW THIS MODEL TO WORK TO HELP PEOPLE AS A PRIVATE PUBLIC CHARITY SO WE'RE A PRIVATE ENTITY BUT WE HAVE THIS PUBLIC CHARITY, SO THE HOME ITSELF IS GOING TO HAVE WHATEVER VALUE WOULD BE THE APPRAISED VALUE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION. >> I THINK THE QUESTION WAS MORE CENTERED AROUND THE NEIGHBORS. YOU PUT ONE OF THESE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, ALL THE NEIGHBORS AROUND IT -- >> BECAUSE IT HAS LOWER INCOME, AND THE ANSWER TO THAT, THERE'S NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT HAVING THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH ADU'S IN A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD LOWER THE VALUE. APPRAISALS LOOK AT THE COMPARISON METH OF THE QUALITY AND THE SIZE OF CONSTRUCTION AND WHAT THE ACTUAL HOME IS, NOT NECESSARILY THE USE, SO THEY'RE GOING TO VALUE THE HOME, NOT THE RENT, IT'S NOT LIKE A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY THIS IS A PRIVATE SINGLE FAMILY HOME, THEY'RE GOING TO VALUE THE HOME ON THE LAND AND THE VALUE OF THE HOME PLUS THE LAND SHOULD NOT BRING DOWN VALUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. >> AND AGAIN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT YOU GUYS BUILDING AND OWNING AND MAINTAINING, YOU'RE NOT BUILDING AND SELLING, YOU GUYS ARE HOLDING THE QUOTES AND BEING RESPONSIBLE. >> IT OWNS AND MANAGES ITS OWN PORTFOLIO. >> MR. MAYOR, I MIGHT INTERJECT, ONE THING THAT MAYBE NOT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS IS WHEN THE CITY HAS SURPLUS PROPERTY IT HAS TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS OF OFFERING THAT PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, I KNOW THE COUNCIL KNOWS THAT, OTHER INS THE AUDIENCE MAY NOT KNOW THAT AND IT COULD VERY WELL HAVE BEEN THAT WE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN A MUCH INFERIOR PRODUCT TO WHAT'S BEING OFFERED HERE AND THIS IS NOT MEANT TO CAST DISPERSIONS ON OTHER DEVELOPERS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUT WE COULD HAVE GOTTEN A MORE TRADITIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRODUCT AND THE CITY'S HANDS WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY MUCH TIED BECAUSE WE HAVE TO OFFER TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS FIRST AND ONLY IF THERE IS NOT A REASONABLE OFFER, THEN AND ONLY THEN CAN THE CITY GO TO MARKET RATE, SO I THINK YOU'RE GETTING A SUPERIOR PRODUCT TO WHAT THE OPTION COULD BE HERE BECAUSE YOU'RE GETTING ATTRACTIVE HOMES BUT YOU'RE ALSO GETTING SOMETHING THAT'S BEING MANAGED BY THE DEVELOPER WHEREAS -- IT'S NOT YOUR TIME TO TALK, THANK YOU. YOU COULD HAVE GOTTEN MUCH INFERIOR PRODUCTS IS THE POINT I WANT TO MAKE AND I THINK I JUST WANT THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY'S HANDS ARE TIED AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IS -- HAS BEEN THE GOAL OF THE STATE FOR THE PAST FIVE YEAR AND IS THE STATE HAS BEEN CHANGING THE LAW TO ESSENTIALLY TIE THE CITY'S HANDS AND THIS IS JUST ONE SMALL WAY BUT THE GOOD THING IS WE HAVE A SUPERIOR PRODUCT HERE BEING OFFERED BY A DEVELOPER OR THE NON-PROFIT ARM OF A DEVELOPER THAT DOES DEVELOP IN THIS COMMUNITY, SO I JUST WANT TO OFFER THAT IS THAT THIS ISN'T SOMETHING THAT COMES TO US, YOU KNOW, AS WE'RE JUST OFFERING IT ON THE MARKET, WE ARE OFFERING IT ON THE MARK BUT WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH SEVERAL HOOPS AND IF WE DON'T, I JUST WANT TO EMPHASIZE IF WE DON'T OFFER THIS THROUGH THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW AND IS WE DON'T COMPLY, WE COULD INCUR SOME PRETTY SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES SO JUST PUTTING THAT ON THE RECORD FOR THOSE AND I REALIZE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS NOT A SUBJECT THAT MOST PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF THIS SIDE OF THE ROOM KNOW BUT I WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE FOR EVERYONE'S BENEFIT. >> YEAH, AND TO ECHO HIS COMMENTS, THE FRUSTRATION WE HAVE UP HERE AS WELL BECAUSE OUR HANDS HAVE BEEN TIED IN IN OF THESE SITUATIONS ABOUT THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITIES WHICH WE'RE BUILDING, LIKE YOU ELECTED US, YOUR CITY REPRESENTATIVES TO BUILD THE CITY ACCORDING TO THE CITY'S CHARACTER THAT EVERYBODY ELECTED US -- WANTED US TO DO, AND THE STATE HAS TIED OUR HANDS IN MANY WAYS, AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS ONE OF THEM AND IT'S VERY FRUSTRATING FOR US AS WELL BUT I'LL GET OFF MY SOAP BOX. ALRIGHT, I GUESS WE'RE ON TO DELIBERATIONS OR DISCUSSIONS? MS. WILLIAMS? >> I MEAN, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE AUDIENCE, I THINK WE SHOULD KNOW THAT YOU SAID IT AT THE BEGINNING BUT THEY CAME UP AND YOU FEEL AS THE CITY MANAGER, THE PERSON WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE, YOU FEEL THIS IS A VERY FAIR OFFER. >> YES, AS PART OF THE PROCESS, THE ONE THING WE HAVE DISCRETION ON WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT OUR HANDS BEING TIED, THE ONE THING WE HAVE DISCRETION ON IS PRICE AND WHAT'S FAIR MARKET VALUE AND WHAT'S NOT AND I THINK THE YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION HAS PRESENTED THEIR CASE FOR THEIR OFFER OF 300 THOUSAND, WE'VE LOOKED AT MARKET RATE AND WHAT WE COULD POTENTIALLY GET, THAT'S A POTENTIAL, IT DOESN'T MEAN WE HAVE ANY OFFERS, WE WEREN'T EVEN AT A POSITION TO MOVE ON FROM THE YELLOW ROOF FOUNDATION PROPOSAL, BUT IN MY ANALYSIS AND MY RECOMMENDATION DIRECTED TO THE COUNCIL, YOU KNOW, I FEEL LIKE WE TRY TO LOOK FOR COMMUNITY PARTNERS WHEN WE SELL PARCELS ASK WE TRY TO DO WHAT'S IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE AND WE DO HAVE AN ISSUE WITH HOUSING IN THE CITY, WE DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH MARKET RATE HOUSING OR AN ISSUE WITH MODERATE AND ABOVE MODERATE HOUSE, PLENTY OF THAT IS BEING CONSTRUCTED BUT WE DO NOT PROVIDE AS MUCH LOWER INCOME HOUSING AT THE 80% OF THE MEDIAN INCOME OR BELOW, THE WAY WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO SATISFY THAT OVER THE YEARS HAS BEEN APARTMENTS AND WE HAVE PLENTY OF DEED RESTRICTED AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS FOR BOTH FAMILIES AND SENIORS, THIS WOULD BE REALLY SOMETHING NEW THE CITY HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO OFFER, PART OF THE PROBLEM IS COMMUNITIES HAVE WHAT'S CALLED INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCES WHERE THEY REQUIRE X PERCENTAGE, USUALLY MINIMUM 15% OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS TO BE AFFORDABLE AND THESE TYPES OF PRODUCTS ARE INTERMINGLED THROUGH THOSE DEVELOPMENTS SO YOU REALLY CAN'T TELL DRIVING DOWN THE STREET WHAT'S A DEED RESTRICTED UNIT AND NOT, OUR CITY DOESN'T HAVE THAT LUX SURE RI, WE ASSOCIATE A BACKLOG OF BELTED UNITS THAT WOULD BE HARD TO IMPLEMENT AN ORDINANCE TO BE EFFECTIVE BUT IN THIS INSTANCE, WE CAN GENERATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE DEED RESTRICTED FOR 55 YEARS AND MANAGED BY A WELL RESPECTED HOUSING DEVELOPER IN THE REGION, SO FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I FEEL THE OFFER'S FAIR AND I FEEL LIKE THE PROJECT IS A BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY. >> AND JUST ONE MORE FOLLOW-UP BECAUSE WE HEARD ABOUT HOME VALUES AND ALL OF THAT, SO WHEN APPRAISALS ARE HAPPENING, THEY DON'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE RAW LOT, SO THOSE LOTS SELLING FOR THAT AMOUNT IS NOT GOING TO BRING DOWN THE VALUE, IT'S ONCE THE HOUSE IS BUILT, THAT'S WHERE THE APPRAISAL COMES IN, THAT'S WHERE THE VALUE FOR HOMES ALL COME IN, CORRECT? >> ONCE THE HOUSE IS CONSTRUCTED, YES, THE COUNTY WILL ASSESS BOTH THE LAND AND THE IMPROVEMENT VALUE AND I WOULD EXPECT THAT TO BE EXACTLY WHAT THE OTHER HOMES ARE APPRAISING FOR IN THAT AREA IF NOT MORE, USUALLY NEW CONSTRUCTION IS AT A HIGHER VALUE THAN EXISTING STOCK. >> AND THEN LAST ONE, SO, SAY WE DIDN'T PROCEED WITH THIS AND THE CITY BUILT THREE HOUSES AND WE SOLD THE HOUSES ON OUR OWN, THEN THE PERSON WHO BOUGHT IT COULD BECOME A LANDLORD, SECTION 8 IS LEGAL IN EVERY SINGLE RESIDENCE IN CALIFORNIA, WE HAVE TO ACCEPT SECTION 8, SO, THAT COULD STILL BE A POSSIBLE THAT THERE'S SOME INCOME RESTRICTIONS WITHOUT HAVING THIS NON-PROFIT WHO'S GOING TO TAKE ALL THE WORK OFF AND MANAGE IT FOR THE CITY AND MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS POLLED TO THE LETTER OF THE LAW, CORRECT? >> SURE, THAT IS A DEFINITE POSSIBILITY. >> OKAY, THANKS. >> MR. FULLER? >> YES, FROM MY PERSPECTIVE AND FROM WHAT I HAVE SEEN, I THINK THIS IS A VERY SOLID PROJECT, IT'S INCLUSIONARY HOUSE, I HAVE SAID MANY TIMES FROM THIS DAIS THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO PUT -- AT LEAST IF I HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT IT, PEOPLE OFFER AGO SEPARATE AREA ALL BY THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY AREN'T THE RIGHT PEOPLE, I WANT PEOPLE INCLUDED IN THE COMMUNITY AND THAT IF THEY HAVE A PLACE WHERE THEY CAN BE DIGNIFIED AND COME HOME AND HAVE A GOOD PLACE TO BE AND YOU CAN SEE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE DIFFICULTIES PROBABLY BUT WE HAVE A SOLID POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT CAN DEAL WITH IT, SO I AM VERY PLEASED TO SEE IT HERE AND I DON'T FEEL THAT WE HAVE ANY APOLOGIES TO MAKE AND WE SHOULD MOVE FORWARD. >> MR. MEADOWS? >> I AM SUPPORTIVE OF THE SALE TO YELLOW ROOF AND TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION IN THE BACK ABOUT VALUES, IN MY OPINION, YOUR VALUES WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THESE THREE UNITS. >> AND HE HAS BACKGROUND IF REAL ESTATE, HE'S NOT JUST SAYING THAT. >> ALRIGHT, YEAH, IN GENERAL, BIG PICTURE, I'M MUCH NOR FAVOR OF THESE PRIVATE PROGRAMS FOR THIS RATHER THAN THESE BIG UNACCOUNTABLE BUREAUCRATIC GOVERNMENT ONES, I LIKE THIS PROJECT MUCH MORE THAN I LIKE THE FOUR STORY WE HAVE BEHIND THE RALEY'S, IT FITS MORE INTO THE CHARACTER WHEN I CHOSE TO MOVE MY FAMILY HERE, THE HOMES DON'T LOOK EXACTLY LIKE THE HOMES OUT THERE BUT THAT WAS A DIFFERENT DECADE WHEN THEY WERE BUILT BUT THEY LOOK LIKE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, YOU CAN BARELY TELL THAT THOSE STAIRS GO UP TO THAT UPSTAIRS UNIT, SO CONCEPTUALLY, I LIKE THE IDEA OF THIS BETTER, AGAIN, I SAID EARLIER AND OUR HANDS ARE SOMEWHAT TIED, IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE STATE LAWS THAT WE'RE FOLLOWING, YOU NEED TO CONTACT YOUR STATE ELECTEDS, AND LET THEM KNOW THEY NEED CHANGING BECAUSE WE ARE DOING THAT FROM OUR SIDE THROUGH THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES AND OTHER WAYS, BUT YOU G

Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority held August 9, 2022 1.OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority Mayor Randy Pope called the meeting to order at 6:41 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. The meeting began late due to technical issues. Vice Mayor Meadows and Councilmembers Anissa Williams, George Fuller and Sue Higgins were also in attendance. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Aubrey, Taylor and Ashley from Girl Scout Troops 33787 and 33784) The Girl Scouts were not in attendance. Mayor Pope led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.3 Proclamation Declaring August 18, 2022 "Never Give Up Day" No one was present to receive the proclamation. Mayor Pope mentioned it would be mailed to the person requesting the proclamation. 1.4 Proclamation Recognizing August 31, 2022 as International Overdose Awareness Day (Danielle Aubin & April Rovero) No one was present to receive the proclamation. Mayor Pope mentioned it would be mailed to the person requesting the proclamation. 1.5 Update from Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging (Michael Rigsby) Michael Rigsby provided information regarding the groups he is involved in on the Advisory Council and requested Council input regarding priorities of interest. Councilmember Higgins requested focus on affordable senior housing and rent remaining level. Mayor Pope supported that as the biggest issue brought to Council by seniors. Councilmember Fuller requested focus on mental health for seniors.

1.6 Update from Contra Costa Animal Services (Steve Burdo) Steve Burdo was caught in traffic. The Council delayed hearing the item until his arrival. Mr. Burdo provided a PowerPoint presentation including an agency snapshot, services provided, top activities in Oakley, CCAS Agreement (detail, fee structure and staffing), and information regarding free adoptions in August and September. Councilmember Fuller inquired if Animal Service works with other groups for adoption if specific breeds are brought in. He also inquired what services animals receive before adopted and what call center enhancement has been made. He expressed appreciation for reduced licensing costs for seniors. Mr. Burdo explained they advertise on their website and social media, and work with transfer partners and rescue groups with focus on specific breeds. He mentioned animals must be spayed/neutered, vaccinated and microchipped before available to adopt. He indicated more information is now available online to assist with services and reduce the number of calls received and wait time is now 5-7 minutes. He mentioned reduced licensing costs for seniors and free licensing and adoption for Veterans. Councilmember Williams inquired if Animal Services handles livestock, i.e., removal of horses that are put down. Mr, Burdo explained they have a 6-stall barn to handle situations involving public safety; however, they do not handle removal of deceased livestock from private properties. Councilmember Williams suggested resources on the County website for people to access for removal. 2.PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 3.CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 3.2 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance to Repeal Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.502 “Commercial Downtown District (CD)” (RZ 02- 22) - City-initiated application to repeal Oakley Municipal Code (“OMC”) Section 9.1.502 “Commercial Downtown District (CD)” as a clean-up item to the Zoning Code (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager)

3.3 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Adding Chapter 39 to Title 4 of the Oakley Municipal Code Relating to Military Equipment use by the Oakley Police Department (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 3.4 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Adding Chapter 38 to Title 4 of the Oakley Municipal Code Concerning Spectators at Illegal Speed Contests, Exhibitions of Speed, and side Shows (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 3.5 City of Oakley Quarterly Investment Report (4th Quarter FY 2021/22) (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) 3.6 City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Quarterly Investment Report (4th Quarter FY 2021/22) (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) 3.7 Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22 Fourth Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3.8 Acceptance of work associated with the Police Department Parking Lot Expansion Project – Capital Improvement Project Number 253 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3.9 Approving the Agreement with Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority for “Stormwater Management Facility Operations and Maintenance Agreement, and Right of Entry” for the Tri Delta Transit Park and Ride project located at 4300 Main Street (APN 035-282-063) and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3.10 Adopt Resolution of Intention to Establish Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 (HCP/NCCP Services) (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3.11 Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Bellecci and Associates to Provide Design Services for Capital Improvement Project Number 285 – Bethel Island Road Construction Project (Rock Slough Bridge to Delta Road) (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 3.12 Acceptance of Subdivision Improvements Associated with Acacia Subdivision 9498 located at Main Street and Ramos Ranch Road (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer)

3.13 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, Finance Director, and Accounting Manager to Act as the Agents to Engage with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) (Joshua Mc Murray, City Manager) Councilmember Fuller pulled items 3.5 and 3.7. It was moved by Vice Mayor Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Higgins to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 3.5 Councilmember Fuller commended Mr. Przybyla on a great report. It was moved by Councilmember Fuller and seconded by Vice Mayor Meadows to accept the report. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 3.7 Councilmember Fuller commented that project #215 involves $3.975 million ($4 million rounded) for a parking lot. It was moved by Councilmember Higgins and seconded by Vice Mayor Meadows to accept the report. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 5.REGULAR CALENDAR 5.1 Designation of a Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Annual Conference September 7- 9, 2022 and Directing City Administration to complete and forward the voting delegate form to the League of California Cities (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report. It was moved by Vice Mayor Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Higgins to designate Councilmember Williams as the voting delegate for the League of California Cities Annual Conference Business Meeting to be held Friday, September 9, 2022. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

5.2 Consider authorizing the City Manager to send a letter in support of the development and opening of the Marsh Creek State Historic Park on behalf of the City of Oakley (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report. Councilmember Higgins inquired if there is any financial commitment by the City. Mr. McMurray indicated there is none. Councilmember Fuller thanked staff for the maps and mentioned they are on the City’s website. It was moved by Councilmember Williams and seconded by Vice Mayor Meadows to authorize the City Manager to send the letter in support. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 5.3 Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the City of Oakley Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget to Expand upon the Pilot Oakley Community Digital Gift Card Program (Harumi Murata, Economic Development Analyst) Economic Development Analyst Harumi Murata presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. Councilmember Higgins inquired if people previously purchased cards if they can purchase again. She expressed she likes buy one, get one free, but has trouble finding her balance. She inquired if there is an 800 number. Ms. Murata responded that login to an account is the primary way to check the balance. Councilmember Williams inquired if participating businesses have provided feedback and if she is using that data to attract businesses slower to adopt the program. Ms. Murata responded there has been positive feedback from the 23 businesses participating and she is using the data to attract more businesses to the program with the goal of 50 businesses eventually participating. James Gearing provided public comment. He inquired if the program is funded by the City and encouraged shopping in Oakley. Mayor Pope explained the program if funded with federal ARPA funds. It was moved by Councilmember Higgins and seconded by Councilmember Fuller to adopt the resolution. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

Before moving to hear item 5.4, the Mayor returned to hear item 1.6 as Steve Burdo was now in attendance. 5.4 Authorization for the City Manager to Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Yellow Roof Foundation for the sale of properties located at 4981, 4901 and 4911 Teakwood Drive (APN’s: 035-322-019, 035-322-020, 035-322-021) which will lead to the construction of 6 affordable housing units (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) City Manager Joshua McMurray presented the staff report. Francine Lumperis expressed concern that they were not notified of the affordable housing units. Ray Serna expressed concern regarding the affordable housing decreasing surrounding home values, increasing traffic and that the homes do not fit in with the neighborhood. He mentioned they have high density already with apartments at Teakwood and Main and senior housing; they need homes to match. He indicated they do not want this. Dana Tsubota with Yellow Roof Foundation (YRF) provided an overview of what they do and intend to do with these lots, explaining they find surplus land and with donations of time, talent and materials, they build at a lower cost. She mentioned they offer fixed rent at 30% of income level of the occupant and it is not high density. She shared they have a similar completed project in Pittsburg and it houses a teacher, security guard and city administrator; people who had hard times in the past and are getting back on their feet; their stay is for a limited time to help bridge that gap. Councilmember Higgins inquired if YRF manages the properties. Ms. Tsubota explained YRF manages the property and helps occupants set up bank accounts and gain access to financial training. Councilmember Williams commented she is surprised at some pushback and inquired how they select occupants and what happens if occupants don’t leave after the 3-year lease term. Ms. Tsubota responded they work with local community partners, applications are submitted and reviewed as received with standard qualifications, they are building multiple projects, and they follow the law regarding rentals. Mayor Pope requested staff address notification of the project. He inquired if there are any age restrictions and about any increase in traffic/speed of traffic. Mr. McMurray explained it is not a project yet and therefore does not require noticing, but DeNova will provide notification when construction begins. He mentioned there

are no age restrictions; however, they could direct coordinating such for the need of the community. He also mentioned the properties are zoned residential and the General Plan and Zoning assume there are homes on the lots; 3 units have nominal peak hour trips so there is no impact. He added the City has a traffic calming program to address speed, accessible on the City’s website. Mayor Pope inquired if a third unit ADU could be added to each parcel, commenting that the property is dense already. Ms. Tsubota indicated the plans are drawn for only 2 units per lot. Gerry Schwartz inquired if residents were invited to the initial meeting involving discussions of these affordable housing units and if it is a done deal or if further work group discussions can be provided. He expressed the units are not good for the neighborhood. Mr. McMurray explained there was a public City Council meeting on July 12, 2022, where the item was addressed. Mayor Pope explained these parcels are surplus property and when not used for a City purpose, by law, the City has to offer it to certain purposes, i.e., affordable housing, as in this situation. He added they are only discussing the purchase and sale agreement at this time. Ms. Tsubota explained the value of the homes will still be comparable to those in the neighborhood; just because they are building them at lower cost does not mean they will not have comparable value and there is no evidence to suggest it will lower home values as appraisals look at the home, not the use. City Attorney Derek Cole explained that surplus property has to be offered for affordable housing and it could have been a situation of a more traditional affordable housing project that was proposed and the City’s hands would be tied, but this is a superior product to what could have been. He further explained the City cannot offer to the market unless it is first offered for affordable housing and if the City doesn’t offer it, it can be subject to significant penalties. Councilmember Williams inquired if this is a fair offer and if once the homes are built if the appraisal value comes in. Mr. McMurray explained the City has discretion on price and it looks for community partners when they sell properties. He mentioned moderate/above housing is fine in the City, but low-income has been harder to come by and this offers an alternative to apartments; it will be managed and maintained by a well-respected company in this region. He mentioned the land plus improvements will be calculated for value and he expects it will the same if not higher of existing surrounding homes.

Councilmember Williams inquired if the City does not proceed with this if someone else could develop it for Section 8 housing. Mr. McMurray responded that is a possibility. Councilmember Fuller commented it is a good, solid project and he doesn’t want to see people put into a separate area because other people don’t want it in their neighborhood. He indicated to move it forward. Vice Mayor Meadows supported it and indicated in his opinion, home values will not be affected. Mayor Pope expressed support indicating he is in favor of private programs as opposed to bureaucratic government programs and he likes the homes rather than apartments. He mentioned the City’s hands are tied to offer it for affordable housing and if people do not like that, they need to let their state representatives know. It was moved by Councilmember Williams and seconded by Councilmember Higgins to adopt the resolution approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 5.5 4th Quarter Budget Update (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) Finance Director Tim Przybyla presented the staff report. Councilmember Higgins inquired if the City receives revenue from County pools and if gas is still the highest tax. Mr. Przybyla responded that the City receives a share of sales tax revenue and gas is still the highest tax. No public comments were submitted. It was moved by Vice Mayor Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Fuller to accept the update. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Mayor Pope called for a brief recess at 8:12 p.m. The City Council reconvened at 8:17 p.m. 5.6 Adopt a Resolution Establishing a Proclamation Policy (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) City Clerk Libby Vreonis presented the staff report. City Attorney Derek Cole explained the Establishment Clause and that the City cannot promote religion but can recognize service arms for non-religious services provided.

Mayor Pope indicated “Mormon Helping Hands” has been updated to “Helping Hands”. Councilmember Fuller requested Juneteenth added to the list. Councilmember Higgins expressed she likes standard proclamations that outline the month, then if requested, have the Mayor approve. Mayor Pope explained the difference between a proclamation and resolution. He mentioned the pre-approved list streamlines the process. Mayor Pope and Councilmember Fuller exchanged words regarding items that are controversial versus non-controversial. Mr. Cole clarified the action before the Council is 1) to adopt a proclamation policy or not, and 2) approve the existing list or modify. Mr. McMurray indicated staff looked at best practices of other cities and wants to bring something that will work for Oakley; if the Council wants staff to research further, they can. Councilmember Fuller provided a list of items to add and remove. It was moved by Vice Mayor Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Higgins to approve the proclamation policy. AYES: Higgins, Meadows, Pope, Williams. NOES: Fuller. (4-1) Vice Mayor Meadows commented he has no issue with additions made by Councilmember Fuller. Mayor Pope commented he had no issue with items added. It was moved by Councilmember Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Williams to approve the list with the changes Councilmember Fuller submitted. Mayor Pope commented he agrees with the removal of “Mormon” from “Helping Hands”. Councilmember Fuller commented he can live with that. Vice Mayor Meadows requested 100th birthdays to remain on the list. Mr. Cole clarified that the motion has been amended to include “Helping Hands Day” and 100th birthday recognition to remain on the list.

Councilmember Fuller commented he is okay with that if a person is not required to attend in person to receive it. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 6.REPORTS 6.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager City Manager Joshua McMurray announced the Fishing Derby to be held Saturday, Movie in the Plaza on 8/27, Friday Night Bites on 9/2, and the Heart of Oakley Festival on 9/24. 6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Councilmember Williams reported she is now the Board Chair for Tri-Delta Transit, on 9/12 Tri-Delta will go to full service, she provided information regarding Try My Ride, she mentioned there has been a delay with PG&E regarding the park and ride, Pass to Class is offered for free bus passes to every student in households, a hydrogen fueling station is upcoming, 15 additional drivers are needed, and CEO Jeanne Krieg is retiring and a new CEO will be appointed. Councilmember Higgins announced she will attend a conference in Seattle on October 8, the 6th Annual Out of Darkness Walk will be held October 1, 9am-12pm, and a health resource fair including a blood drive will be held October 15 at St. Anthony, 9am-3pm. Vice Mayor Meadows reported he attended a Transplan meeting 3 weeks ago and will attend another Transplan meeting Thursday. (b) Requests for Future Agendas Councilmember Higgins requested the Municipal Code be changed to no longer allow oil and gas drilling. Councilmember Williams supported it. Councilmember Higgins also requested disc golf parks and pickleball courts in Oakley. Councilmember Williams supported it.

Councilmember Fuller mentioned the oil and gas item will be addressed in the work session. He inquired if it is necessary to bring up as a future agenda item. Mr. McMurray mentioned during the work session, staff will obtain feedback from the Council and they can accomplish the item in discussion. 7.WORK SESSIONS 7.1 Work Session on Oil and Gas Drilling (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Planning Manager Ken Strelo presented the staff report. Mike Moore, a 2016 Oakley Leadership Academy Graduate, researched oil and gas wells in Oakley as part of a Leadership project. He commented that there is no need to allow oil and gas drilling in Oakley as there are 96 oil and gas wells in Oakley and 95 of those are plugged or abandoned. He provided background information when the wells were producing and when they stopped. Tatiana Torres urged the Council to ban oil and gas drilling and prevent any future drilling in the County. She referred to rigs near Heritage High School and the decline it has had on property values, negative impact on the environment, and associated health concerns. Rohan Tyagi urged the Council to ban oil and gas drilling and encourage the County to do the same. He mentioned the County lacks awareness of the impact on 39,000 people within 2.5 miles of sites. He referred to the climate action plan and high asthma rates in East Contra Costa County. He mentioned Los Angeles County has a 5-year phase out plan. He suggested change starts here. Ian Cohen urged the Council to ban oil and gas drilling and encourage the County to do the same for the safety and well being of families and students within 2.5 miles of drilling. Mrs. Moore commented that she didn’t know there was gas all around and she has developed allergies due to pollution. She pleaded the Council consider making the air clearer. Justin Brown requested the Council consider banning oil and gas drilling within the City. An online public comment was submitted by Sinziana Todor urging the Council to encourage the County to shut down current gas and oil drilling and ban future gas and oil drilling for public health and safety.

An online public comment was submitted by Marjaneh Moini, MD and Amanda Millstein, MD encouraging the City and County to ban gas and oil drilling for public health and safety. Councilmember Fuller inquired if the City would be liable to landowners for losing minerals from their land if the City bans oil and gas drilling. City Attorney Derek Cole responded that a State Supreme Court decision is expected next year regarding Monterey County. He explained the state preempts local government from banning the activity. He mentioned if the Council wishes to regulate, it could have a moratorium up to two years and see how the court decision unfolds, then adopt a permanent ordinance consistent with the court decision. He added that the City is not responsible for mineral rights of property owners; the City is a regulatory body. He mentioned he understands there are no active operations, and none in the past two years. He explained the Council is not afoul of Constitutional limitations if it decides to have a moratorium. Vice Mayor Meadows commented he has not seen oil and gas in Oakley in his life, but rather natural gas as most people heat their homes with it. He expressed concern if a problem even exists in Oakley for the Council to take action. Mr. Strelo commented in his 15 years as a staff member, he has received no applications. Councilmember Higgins suggested if there is no problem, then there is no harm to ban it and send a letter to the County. Councilmember Williams and Councilmember Fuller exchanged words regarding a comment made by Councilmember Williams regarding time spent on discussion of items. Councilmember Williams commented the topic is worthy for the future of families and they should move forward to improve air quality and put pressure on the County. Mayor Pope expressed concern regarding banning something that hasn’t been replaced yet with an alternative. He suggested a 500-foot setback as with other sensitive uses. He inquired if wells can be reactivated. Mr. Strelo responded staff would need to research to respond. Mayor Pope commented that he wants to know what it means to have a well “capped”—if the land can be used in perpetuity. He mentioned with the energy crisis, the timing is wrong; there needs to be an energy replacement first. He also mentioned the County has other issues having the biggest refinery in the state. Councilmember Fuller spoke to 9/11/01 and how fuel was needed to keep military aircraft in the air on standby to defend this country. He mentioned the state has

expertise what to do with oil drilling; however, the City should change its ordinance because as it stands now, operations are allowed and new operations could come in. He mentioned he would like to have the court decision before an ordinance is brought forth. Councilmember Higgins commented that Brentwood has a moratorium, they can look at the state says, not open capped wells, consider a buffer zone or ban it, and revisit the Municipal Code. Councilmember Williams commented she supports a buffer zone within a 500-foot distance from buildings and she doesn’t think a new operation would come in to drill because they wouldn’t have surface rights. Mayor Pope suggested 500 foot+ buffer from buildings and other structures plus concealment. Mr. McMurray commented that at least 3 Councilmembers have expressed staff should look at the Municipal Code and provide distance between drilling and structures. He inquired if there is consensus on a moratorium. Councilmembers Higgins and Williams responded they support a moratorium. Mayor Pope expressed he does not support it. Councilmember Fuller expressed he can live with a moratorium but wants a date certain when it will come back for a permanent ordinance to be considered. Mr. McMurray indicated staff will look at the current ordinance and bring something back to Council. 8.CLOSED SESSION Mayor Pope announced the closed session items. 8.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e) Title: City Manager 8.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS-Labor Negotiations with the City Manager Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a) City Designated Representative: Randy Pope, Mayor, Aaron Meadows, Vice Mayor and Derek Cole, City Attorney Unrepresented Employee: City Manager

9.ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Respectively Submitted, Libby Vreonis City Clerk

Showing the first 24,000 of 443,043 characters. The full document is at the source.

AGENDA REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/ OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Tuesday, August 09, 2022 6:30 PM Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561 MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people. VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard. Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road. Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us. A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000. The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing info@ci.oakley.ca.us. If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000. 1

Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video. Information Regarding Public Comment Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/. 1.OPENING MATTERS Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Aubrey, Taylor and Ashley from Girl Scout Troops 33787 and 33784) 1.3 Proclamation Declaring August 18, 2022 "Never Give Up Day" Proclamation 1.4 Proclamation Recognizing August 31, 2022 as International Overdose Awareness Day (Danielle Aubin & April Rovero) Proclamation 1.5 Update from Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging (Michael Rigsby) 1.6 Update from Contra Costa Animal Services (Steve Burdo) 2

2.PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, however, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. 3.CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. Members of the public should submit any Speaker Cards related to the Consent Calendar in advance of the Consent Calendar being considered. 3.1 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo 3.2 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance to Repeal Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.502 “Commercial Downtown District (CD)” (RZ 02-22) - City-initiated application to repeal Oakley Municipal Code (“OMC”) Section 9.1.502 “Commercial Downtown District (CD)” as a clean-up item to the Zoning Code (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Ordinance 3.3 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Adding Chapter 39 to Title 4 of the Oakley Municipal Code Relating to Military Equipment use by the Oakley Police Department (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Ordinance 3.4 Waive the Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Adding Chapter 38 to Title 4 of the Oakley Municipal Code Concerning Spectators at Illegal Speed Contests, Exhibitions of Speed, and side Shows (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Ordinance 3.5 City of Oakley Quarterly Investment Report (4th Quarter FY 2021/22) (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) Staff Report 1. Investment Report 2. Quarterly Investment Performance Report 3

3.6 City of Oakley as Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Quarterly Investment Report (4th Quarter FY 2021/22) (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) Staff Report 1. Investment Report 3.7 Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22 Fourth Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 3.8 Acceptance of work associated with the Police Department Parking Lot Expansion Project – Capital Improvement Project Number 253 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Notice of Completion 3.9 Approving the Agreement with Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority for “Stormwater Management Facility Operations and Maintenance Agreement, and Right of Entry” for the Tri Delta Transit Park and Ride project located at 4300 Main Street (APN 035-282-063) and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Stormwater Agreement 3.10 Adopt Resolution of Intention to Establish Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 (HCP/NCCP Services) (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Petition 2. Resolution of Intention 3. Boundary Map 3.11 Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Bellecci and Associates to Provide Design Services for Capital Improvement Project Number 285 – Bethel Island Road Construction Project (Rock Slough Bridge to Delta Road) (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 4

1. Proposal 2. Resolution 3.12 Acceptance of Subdivision Improvements Associated with Acacia Subdivision 9498 located at Main Street and Ramos Ranch Road (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 3.13 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager, Finance Director, and Accounting Manager to Act as the Agents to Engage with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) (Joshua Mc Murray, City Manager) Staff Report 1. Resolution 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.REGULAR CALENDAR 5.1 Designation of a Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Annual Conference September 7- 9, 2022 and Directing City Administration to complete and forward the voting delegate form to the League of California Cities (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. 2022 Voting Delegate Packet 5.2 Consider authorizing the City Manager to send a letter in support of the development and opening of the Marsh Creek State Historic Park on behalf of the City of Oakley (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Staff Report 1. Draft Letter 2. Marsh Creek State Park Maps 5.3 Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the City of Oakley Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget to Expand upon the Pilot Oakley Community Digital Gift Card Program (Harumi Murata, Economic Development Analyst) Staff Report 1. Resolution approving an amendment to the City of Oakley 5

Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget 5.4 Authorization for the City Manager to Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the Yellow Roof Foundation for the sale of properties located at 4981, 4901 and 4911 Teakwood Drive (APN’s: 035-322-019, 035-322-020, 035-322-021) which will lead to the construction of 6 affordable housing units (Joshua McMurray, City Manager) Staff Report 1. Yellow Roof Foundation Purchase and Sale Agreement 2. Yellow Roof Foundation LOI 3. Concept Plans 4. Draft Resolution 5.5 4th Quarter Budget Update (Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) Staff Report 1. City of Oakley General Fund Budget Update – 4th Quarter of Fiscal Year 2021/2022. 2. City of Oakley Sales Tax Update – 1Q 2022 (January – March) 5.6 Adopt a Resolution Establishing a Proclamation Policy (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Staff Report 1. City of Oakley Proclamation Policy 2. Approved Proclamation List 3. Resolution to Adopt the City of Oakley Proclamation policy and Approved Proclamation List 6.REPORTS 6.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager 6.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency (b) Requests for Future Agendas 7.WORK SESSIONS 6

7.1 Work Session on Oil and Gas Drilling (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Staff Report 1. Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.1216 "Oil and Gas Drilling" 2. City of Antioch City Council Packets for Ordinance Introduction and Adoption (Adopted Ordinance not yet available from City of Antioch) 3. City of Brentwood City Council Packets for Interim Ordinance and Urgency Ordinance Extension (Includes adopted Ordinances) 8.CLOSED SESSION 8.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.5(e) Title: City Manager 8.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS-Labor Negotiations with the City Manager Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a) City Designated Representative: Randy Pope, Mayor, Aaron Meadows, Vice Mayor and Derek Cole, City Attorney Unrepresented Employee: City Manager 9.ADJOURN 7

PP RR OO CC LL AA MM AA TT II OO NN declaring August 18, 2022 NEVER GIVE UP DAY WHEREAS, The City of Oakley proudly joins community members in Celebrating Never Give Up Day on Thursday, August 18, 2022; and WHEREAS, Never Give Up Day is focused on cultivating a mindset of determination to help people get through difficult challenges; and WHEREAS, Never Give Up Day not only applauds people for reaching their goals but also supports those who are still trying to achieve their goals; and WHEREAS, Never Give Up Day remains relevant for health care providing organizations, associations and charities in their efforts to establish a call to action and fundraising activities; and WHEREAS, The City of Oakley recognizes Never Give Up Day and its positive influence for people across our community. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Randy Pope Mayor of the City of Oakley, join with the members of the Oakley City Council in proclaiming August 18, 2022 as: NEVER GIVE UP DAY Randy Pope, Mayor 8

A Proclamation Recognizing August 31, 2022 as International Overdose Awareness Day WHEREAS, the City of Oakley does affirm and acknowledge the harm and hardship caused by drug overdose; and; WHEREAS, we recognize that the purpose of International Overdose Awareness Day is to remember loved ones lost to overdose and to end the stigma surrounding substance use disorder (SUD) and drug-related deaths; and; WHEREAS, we resolve to play our part in reducing the toll of overdose in our community, which continues to claim the lives of Oakley community members every year and forever affects those who loved and cared about them; WHEREAS, we affirm that the people affected by overdose are our sons and daughters, our mothers and fathers, our brothers and sisters, are deserving of our love, compassion and support and remembrance; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, I, Randy Pope, Mayor of the City of Oakley, join with the members of the Oakley City Council in proclaiming August 31, 2022 as International Overdose Awareness Day. Dated: August 9, 2022 ___________________ Randy Pope, Mayor 9

Date: July 19, 2022 To: Mayor and Members of City Council From: Derek P. Cole, City Attorney Cc: Joshua McMurray, City Manager Subject: Closed Session Report-Out Memo FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 9, 2022 Background and Analysis The City Council considered the following closed session item during its regular meeting held July 12, 2022: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) City of Long Beach et al. v. Monsanto Company U.S. Dist. Ct. Central Dist. Cal, Case No. CV 16-3493 FMO (ASx) In regard to the conference with legal counsel for existing litigation, City of Long Beach et al. v. Monsanto Company, the City was proposed to be the recipient of class action funds. It was moved by Councilmember Fuller and seconded by Councilmember Higgins to opt out of the settlement agreement and the City will institute its own legal action. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (4-0) Direction was provided to the City Attorney to execute an agreement with a private law firm to represent the City. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) One potential case. In regard to the conference with legal counsel for anticipated litigation, direction was provided to staff to institute legal action. MEMORANDUM Office of the City Attorney 10

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager In regard to the public employee performance evaluation, direction was provided to to staff. There was no reportable action. Fiscal Impact None. Recommendation Receive and file this report. Attachments None. 11

Ordinance No. XX-22 Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. XX-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY REPEALING OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.1.502 “COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (CD)” (RZ 02-22) The City Council of the City of Oakley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The language in Oakley Municipal Code (“OMC”) section 9.1.502 has been a part of the Oakley Zoning Code since inception. Its purpose is to provide the City with a set of land uses and development standards for the continued physical and economic growth of the designated Commercial Downtown area. The Oakley Downtown Specific Plan District (Specific Plan 4), adopted in March of 2010 by Ordinance 06-10, now serves as the document to guide development of all properties formerly within the Commercial Downtown (CD) District, and the CD District is no longer represented on any portion of the Oakley Zoning Map. This repeal ordinance will delete all parts of Section 9.1.502 except for the title. SECTION 2. Repeal of Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.502. 1. Oakley Municipal Code Section 9.1.502 titled “Commercial Downtown District (CD)” is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 3. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project is exempt from environmental analysis under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that the proposed amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 4. Public Hearing Notice On or before July 1, 2022, the Notice of Public Hearing for the project was published in the Contra Costa Times, posted at Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School located at 4901 Frank Hengel Way, and outside the library at Freedom High School located at 1050 Neroly Road, and mailed out to outside agencies and parties requesting such notice. SECTION 5. Effective Date and Posting. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk shall cause the ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation, or by publishing a summary 12

Ordinance No. XX-22 Page 2 of 2 of the proposed ordinance, posting a certified copy of the proposed ordinance in the City Clerk’s Office at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the ordinance is to be adopted, and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, publishing a summary of the ordinance with the names of the Council Members voting for and against the ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9 th day of August, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: APPROVED: Randy Pope, Mayor ATTEST: _____ Libby Vreonis, City Clerk Date 13

Ordinance No. XX-22 Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. XX-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY ADDING CHAPTER 39 TO TITLE 4 OF THE OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE BY THE OAKLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s police power under Article XI Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City Council of the City of Oakley has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances and regulations for the public peace, morals, and welfare of the City and its residents; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481, codified at California Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by an ordinance adopting a “military equipment” use policy, at a regular meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment; and WHEREAS, a draft of the military equipment policy that is codified by this Ordinance was made available for public review and inspection for more than 30 days prior to the public hearing in which this Ordinance was introduced; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the use of the military equipment authorized by this Ordinance is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the military equipment policy authorized by this Ordinance will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF OAKLEY MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 39 is added to Title 4 of the Oakley Municipal Code as follows: Chapter 39 MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY 4.39.102 Purpose. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment, in accordance with California Government Code sections 7070-7072. 4.39.104 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: 14

Ordinance No. XX-22 Page 2 of 5 a. “Governing body” means the city council. b. “Military equipment” includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1) Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles; and 2) Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers; and 3) High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached; and 4) Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants; and 5) Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units; and 6) Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind; and 7) Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram; and 8) Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition; and 9) Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code section 30510 and Penal Code section 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearm; and 10)Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles; and 11) Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools; and 12) Munitions containing tear gas or oleoresin capsicum, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray; and 13) TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs); and 14) Kinetic energy weapons and munitions; and 15) Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight. 15

Ordinance No. XX-22 Page 3 of 5 4.39.106 Policy. It is the policy of the City of Oakley that members of the Oakley Police Department comply with the provisions of California Government Code section 7071 with respect to military equipment. 4.39.108 Military Equipment Coordinator. The Chief of Police should designate a member of the Police Department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to: a. Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy; and b. Identifying Police Department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the department, or the equipment the Police Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body; and c. Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually; and d. Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of the Police Department; and e. Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include: 1) Publicizing the details of the meeting; and 2) Preparing for public questions regarding the Police Department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment. f. Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website; and g. Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Budget documentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Aug 9, 2022 - 06:49 PM — Minutes
  • Aug 9, 2022 - 06:49 PM

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: db365a13f1e9ecdbfa3d2a6a0ec98b5d. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record