CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING

DUNEDIN, FLORIDA MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 7, 2025 PRESENT City Commission: Also Present: CALL TO ORDER CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE 6:00 P.M. Mayor Maureen "Moe" Freaney, Vice Mayor Jeff Gow, Commissioners Tom Dugard, Steven Sandbergen and Robert Walker City Manager Jennifer Bramley, City Attorney Jennifer Cowan, Deputy City Clerk Michelle Wells, Deputy City Manager Jorge Quintas, CRA/Economic Development Director Robert lronsmith, Community Development Director George Kinney, Finance Director Les Tyler, Public Works Director Sue Bartlett, Human Resource/Risk Management Director Theresa E Smalling, Ph.D., Community Development Assistant Director Joseph DiPasqua, Utilities Operations Division Manager Janice Bennett and approximately forty people in the audience. Mayor Freaney called the August 7, 2025, Regular Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Mayor Freaney noted the wonderful ceremony at Purple Heart Park today. INVOCATION AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City Attorney Cowan gave the invocation acknowledging the passing of Grant Gracey and led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. PRESENT ATIO NS - None CITIZEN INPUT Mayor Freaney advised now was the time for anyone in the audience who wished to speak on a topic not on the agenda. David Ballard Geddis Jr. of 802 Georgia Avenue, Palm Harbor commented: Again, based on Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution reflective of the 14th Amendment does the City within its 10 mile square parameter allow businesses to conduct themselves in an ill willed and fraudulent manner allowing businesses being as impost in the city to betray their customer base and ultimately deny their contractual obligation after being paid to conduct themselves legitimately in that contractual obligations are being respected and performed honorably not to disrespect the customer or depart from their paid contractual obligations ultimately in the end not to deceive the customer who paid for such trusted performance. He thereafter related his experience with a local business not performing their contractual obligations after being paid for a trusted performance and his thoughts that it would reflect on the City. Jenny Funderberk of 1373 Curlew Road commented: She wanted to speak again about repairing the bridge at Weybridge. She is aware the residents want to provide the City with a public easement on their side in order to do the repair. Curlew Road is still extremely dangerous to even cross as a pedestrian, but with school starting next week and there are two high school students who used to ride their bikes and go across the bridge to get to school, now they have to go out to Curlew Road. 25-1

Regular Meeting Notes August7,2025 Dunedin City Commission Their neighborhood would have access to go to the city and get on the trail which is why they live there and get to the downtown. She also asked if there is anything being done to clean out the Curlew Creek behind their residences. She has not seen anything going on other than the workers at the lift station and they would like for the bridge to be open as well. It is her belief the structure of the bridge is fine, it just needs new planks to be replaced and that was being done for it seems like 20 years. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Freaney closed the Citizen Input. Response to Public Input Mayor Freaney noted there was brief discussion about the Weybridge bridge at the budget workshop; it is also something staff will be coming forward with options, costs, what can and cannot be done there, that is in process. Public Works Director Bartlett advised the Curlew Creek area was surveyed with a drone and documented the situation. Staff had submitted for a grant to clean that area and expect reimbursement from FEMA for some of it. The grant was on hold and has been released; the paperwork has been filled out and Engineering is doing work along with the Maintenance staff. There is no start date; however, the City Attorney has reviewed the contract and staff will be coming back to the Commission to award that contract for the work. Maintenance has cleaned some other smaller areas; however, this area is beyond the capability to do inhouse. 2. CONSENT AGENDA 2.a. Approve the Minutes for the: A. 6/5/2025 Regular Meeting B. 7/1/2025 Workshop 2.b. Board and Committee Appointments A. Committee on Aging - Reappoint Stella Moya to a regular term ending 8/1/2028 - Reappoint Cara York to a regular term ending 8/1/2028 - Reappoint Maryanne Fisher to a regular term ending 8/1/2028 2.c. Award of Bid # 25-2515 for Skinner Blvd. Electrical Improvements for Undergrounding to KCI Construction Services, LLC, Tampa, FL dba KCI Communications Infrastructure in the amount of $172,992.25 2.d. Approval of a GEC Service Authorization to Tetra Tech, Inc., in the amount of $149,694, for design, permitting, and bidding services for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Emergency Generator Building Rehabilitation Project. 2.e. Award of a Maintenance Management System for the Public Works Department via "piggybacking" an agreement with the Town of Davie, FL - "ITN-RM-22-17" for a Planning, Work & Asset Management Software System, to Maintstar, Inc., in the amount of $110,500. 2.f. Purchase of Two (2) Trailer Mounted Wastewater Bypass Pumps from Mersino Dewatering, LLC, of Jacksonville, FL, via "piggybacking" the Florida Sheriffs Association (FSA) Cooperative Purchasing Program, at a cost of $138,701.40. 25-2

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 MOTION: Dunedin City Commission Motion was made by Commissioner Sand bergen and seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the Consent Agenda except for Item 2.e. Mayor Freaney opened public input on any Consent item. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to speak, Mayor Freaney closed the public input. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 2.e. Award of a Maintenance Management System for the Public Works Department via "piggybacking" an agreement with the Town of Davie, FL - "ITN-RM-22-17" for a Planning, Work & Asset Management Software System, to Maintstar, Inc., in the amount of $110,500. Staff Presentation Public Works Director Bartlett advised: It is correct that this item is in response to the discussions about software to help with being more efficient in managing projects. In response to the question from Vice Mayor Gow as to whether the same result could be accomplished using the existing software the City has noting the good partnership with Tyler, Ms. Bartlett advised it cannot and staff has met with Tyler that does not have the specific features needed to plan the work and compare the work to the plan; therefore, that tool cannot be used to gain the same efficiencies. Staff have in the plan to pay for the software from the efficiency achieved . Public Works staff has discussed this with the IT Department staff continuously and the company was vetted through IT for security concerns; it will be web based, not hosted in the City. MOTION: Motion was made by Vice Mayor Gow and seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve Consent Agenda item 2.e . Mayor Freaney opened public input on any Consent item. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to speak, Mayor Freaney closed the public input. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 3. ACTION ITEMS 3.a. First Reading of Ordinance 25-02: Amending Chapter 111 of the Land Development Code, Historic Preservation City Attorney Cowan read Ordinance 25-02 by title only. MOTION: Staff Presentation Motion was made by Commissioner Dugard and seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve Ordinance 25-02, first reading, amending Chapter 111 of the Land Development Code, Historic Preservation Community Development Director Kinney introduced the agenda item expressing appreciation to Planner II Sharp, City Attorney Cowan and Blair Knighting with Kimley Horn & Associates for their work on this update to this ordinance as well as the Certificate of Appropriateness the Commission will see at the next meeting. 25-3

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission Planner II Sharp, liaison to the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, reviewed the background of the Historic Preservation Ordinance as provided in the Staffing Memo attached to the agenda item. She advised: Based on results of the Commission workshop on March 4, 2025, staff presented to the Local Planning Agency (LPA). On July 9, 2025 , Staff presented Ordinance 25-02 and Resolution 25-13 to the Local Planning Agency that voted 5-1 to recommend approval for the proposed ordinance and resolution with a condition that the language that permits the City Manager to initiate a historic district application based on failure to designate a proposed district as a historic district would result in irreparable harm to the character of the city to be removed. Blair Knighting with Kimley Horn & Associates advised regarding the major updates to the ordinance : Added the Landmark Site in addition to the Landmark; instead of having the whole site a building can be designated; Language added that only the owner can approve the designation of a Landmark; Clarified notice sections; Added the ability to create Historic Districts. Updates to the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) required only after a property is designated that process includes: Clarification in the ordinance of how COA's are processed via the Matrix; there is Administrative now Historic Preservation Review and then City Commission Review so, the Matrix has been updated ; Removed were much of the minor things the City Commission was reviewing; Creation of an easy flow chart; COA's are pre-application with City staff Ms. Knighting clarified the current COA Matrix is used when you have a Landmark and you want to make alterations; the Matrix indicates who approves those alterations . Many of the items the City Commission had to approve such as replacement of windows for Historic windows; that was cleaned up. A column was added for Contributing/Non-Contributing if the ability for Historic Districts is approved. Now Commission approval is needed only for demolition of over 20%; Non-Contributing structures do not need Commission approval. This allows for a little quicker process for the COA Matrix Review . Ms. Knighting reviewed the changes after the Commission Workshop and the two hearings at the LPA. Most of the changes after the Commission Workshops were really for the Historic Districts with concern about not having 100% owner required for an application; that was changed to make sure it was 100% owners. The only people who can apply in the current revision is 100% property owners or the City Manager. The language is essentially the City Manager and 100% owner of the property to apply for Historic Districts. In response to concerns about the HPC applying for Historic Districts that was removed. At the LPA meeting the concern was about questions from the public; a Frequently Asked Questions document was created. It was clarified that in the Historic Districts structures had to be contiguous as a concern from citizens was made clear in the ordinance . 25-4

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission Numerous questions were answered about flood damage and how the application process works. An example is if the City Manager applied for Historic District, there was damage, and what happens. Currently, the ordinance reads if there is a Historic District in place, permits are paused, so no changes to those structures happen during that. A provision was added that allows the City Commission to make a resolution to remove that permit pause. Other hot topic questions from the LPA were who can apply for a Local Landmark. Currently, Local Landmark is HPAC, City Commission, City Manager, and Dunedin Historic Museum Staff can all apply. The proposed ordinance Property Owners can apply for a Local Landmark, that is not Historic District. Now the question is who can apply for Historic District. In the current revisions it is Property Owners with 100% Owner support or City Manager when failure to designate a proposed district would result in irreparable harm to the character of the city. That is two people who can apply for Historic District. Now the question is who can approve a Historic District, that is City Commission that has the final decision. Ms. Knighting explained they also provided examples of other municipalities and how they handle Historic District applications and who can apply which can vary. Questions for Staff Commissioner Walker referred to the LPA minutes and the 5-1 vote to move forward with the exception of the City Manager designation and noted the staff recommendation before the Commission now is to still review the ordinance including the City Manager's designation. He asked why this moved forward without the LPA recommendation . Ms . Sharp explained staff understands the LPA recommendation for that particular language to be removed; ultimately staff leave it to the City Commission to determine their support or if there is another decision from the Commission. City Manager Bramley explained typically staff will make a professionally sound technical recommendation to both the LPA and the City Commission. The LPA is the citizen board appointed by the Commission to provide their recommendations . The professionally sound technical recommendation is not always concurrent with the recommendation of the LPA, usually it is; however, not always. The staff recommendation to the LPA was a sound recommendation predicated upon the fact that if the HPAC is not initiating the designation; it is the property owners and the City Manager, then who would. There is a list of cities where it is the Commission, Council, property owners and so forth. In Dunedin in that case, the City Commission cannot be initiator because they are the final decision maker. Staffs recommendation was sound before the LPA and as such is sound before the Commission from a professional perspective; it does not mean that they necessarily believe the LPA is wrong or provided the wrong recommendation. In responses to the question from Commissioner Walker, Ms. Knighting explained they wanted to make sure there was some kind of failsafe if there was some extraordinary situation as discussed previously where the City Manager could apply for a Historic District. City Attorney Cowan advised regarding the other municipalities where it indicates the City Council or City Commission and some where it indicates the Mayor; in some of those cities they have a strong Mayor which might be why they designated that person versus the type of government Dunedin has as a City Commission. 25-5

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission Commissioner Walker emphasized this is not unilaterally being able to designate a Historic District; it is just the initiation of the process through application which then ultimately would be voted on by the Commission. Commissioner Walker expressed his concern for today knowing the intent of the ordinance as to how this could possibly be construed five to 10 years from now, noting the optic is difficult. He questioned how this could potentially be interpreted outside this particular governing body in the future. City Attorney Cowan commented she was not sure if the question is about the interpretation of it as much as whether or not someone is going to be a good actor or a bad actor and advised: In terms of the interpretation, the concern is with the City Manager so, would the City Manager be a bad actor. First most likely the Commission would hire someone who is a member of the International City Managers Association (ICMA) and following those ethics. Second is they answer to the five members of the Commission so, if they are going rogue or being a bad actor the ultimate responsibility lies with the Commission. Also, with regard to this, they are initiating an application, but the owner has to be noticed right away, then it has to go through HPAC for evaluation and decide; then it ultimately comes to the Commission for the decision to designate or not. In all of those stages the property owner will have notice and there will be an evaluation of not only is this appropriate for the Historic District but is this an appropriate use; would it be irreparable harm if not granted. When Commissioner Walker inquired regarding the definition of irreparable harm, City Attorney Cowan explained: When this was first brought to the Commission it was said to be "extraordinary circumstances" and there were questions as to what would constitute that. It was then changed to "irreparable harm". Irreparable harm is harm that is done that cannot be compensated for by money; there is something more than that. That is a legal standard. The reason that was put in was because essentially an ordinance is a law so, language is put in that is a legally recognized term. If there ever is a challenge outside in a Court, the Court knows the meaning of that term and there is a set standard for evaluation. This is the same standard used when dealing with injunctions. It was done for clarity. Commissioner Walker asked if there is any part of the process where this would go back to a citizen vote of the people who live in the proposed district. City Attorney Cowan advised there is not a vote of the property owners being considered for the district; however, there is notice to the property owners upon the filing of the application for these properties being considered for a Historic District; then there is also notice prior to the HPAC review and not ice prior to the Commission review. That way the property owners are kept informed throughout the process and early as the application can begin to assess whether or not this is something they support or not and reach out. Commissioner Walker clarified with City Attorney Cowan there is consideration of residents at public hearings that are all channels by which they can communicate with the Commission. Commissioner Dugard noted in addition to the questions by Commissioner Walker his question that might help in terms of what damage can be caused to a citizen whose property has fallen into the irreparable harm category where the Manager would start the process. He is looking for the amount of time that would be lost where the property owner would lose 25-6

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission usability or change to their property relative to when it would finally be determined by the Commission yes or no. Ms. Knighting recalled there is an ordinance providing it has to be heard by the HPAC within 60 days , so it does not drag out; it needs to move forward. She would say realistically , probably it would be less than 3 or 4 months . Ms . Kn ighting explained during the intervening period the owner could do repairs; however , they cannot obtain permits for major changes . She emphasized this is in the situation if it comes up that the City Manager has to step in . In addition , City Attorney Cowan explained at no time do the owners lose the use of their property ; if it is a residential home they continue to use it as a residential home . This is only for exterior modifications; if they had interior modifications, she believed they could move forward with that because that is not regulated by the Historic District. If they had exterior modifications then there would be a pause , that being said if they need ordinary repair or maintenance that can still continue . In response to the inquiry by Commissioner Dugard regarding irreparable harm in relation to the Kellogg Mansion for example , Ms . Knighting expla ined that was not a Historic District , it would have been a Landmark designation and she recalled that the HPAC did apply. City Manager Bramley explained regarding the Kellogg Mansion there was an effort to designate historic; the property owner was reluctant; the signature on the application would have been hers to move forward to the City Commission and she did not execute the application . The Kellogg Mansion was in disrepair and could not be repaired in the opinion of many . The property owner went ahead with demolition and in order to address that the City did its best to memorialize that building through the virtual exhibit that was done , and the History Museum did their gala and so forth. City Manager Bramley addressed the issue of irreparable damage . She noted many years ago this idea of Historic Districts was discussed. One of the reasons for those discussions was the south side of Dunedin where many of those properties are zoned MF-7.5 or MF-15 that is a multifamily designation. Many people do not understand their property is zoned for multifamily . She emphasized the criteria is the character of the city , not just the neighborhood so, the bar is incredibly high for that type of harm. Regardless if one entity were to come in and buy up an entire street it is possible they could build townhouses and condominiums on the property ; in the future that could be an example of irreparable harm. The City Manager would not be working in a vacuum , but with members of the community , HPAC , City staff and so forth to analyze the impact on a neighborhood and the City in general. There are some neighborhoods that are of concern . There was original conversation about the districts because of the multifamily zoning designation . One example is the City approached she recalled on Beltrees a number of single-family property owners and in the middle is a multifamily and they would not rezone their property to single family residential and that effort died ; not that she is presenting as a real life example or even a threat right now. She does feel the LPA , the Commission and residents are striving to identify what that would mean and what that could possibly look like. Vice Mayor Gow inquired regarding proposal tonight regarding a possible scenario where all the homes are historic except one or two and wanting to make a district of it versus there is little to no homes already deemed historic but the City going in and making an entire st reet a historic district. 25-7

Regular Meeting Notes August7,2025 Dunedin City Commission City Attorney Cowan explained whatever homes you were designating for that district would need to meet the criteria within the ordinance as to what makes them historic, what is that characteristic whether they are individually already designated and you are taking a bunch of individual homes that are designated and saying now they are a district or whether or not you are taking homes that are yet to be designated and those are being proposed as a district. All the homes would need to meet that criteria; there is not a number of homes that already have to be designated to bring them as a district. Vice Mayor Gow asked for a district is there a minimum, two homes or one street. Ms. Knighting explained that has been left very flexible; it is more than one . Part of that is when individuals want to come forward and say they want it to be a district; it may be there are 10 homes on a block and there are 5 property owners that want it; those five could still make a district of their 5 properties. Commissioner Sandbergen clarified with the current proposal includes the City Manager ' ability to apply; he asked if she thought this increases value in neighborhoods . Ms . Knighting thought it has been proven that Historic Districts increase value as well as creating a sense of place for existing residents. Commissioner Sandbergen clarified with Ms . Knighting a resident cannot register their neighbor's home; the only people who can apply for historic district or landmark are property owners or the City Manager may apply for a historic district if there is irreparable harm . Commissioner Sandbergen noted it seems a property owner with damage from a fire or hurricane would have to go through more steps because they will have to comply with the requirements for the historic as well as the normal Dunedin Codes; He asked would it take more and cost more for the homeowner to bring it back to livable standards . Ms. Knighting explained if there is a property in either landmark or local historic district in place and they have to repair they have to follow the COA process for exterior changes if they have volunteered to designate their home as a local landmark. For repairs a COA is not needed if repairing to pre-damage condition. Ms. Knighting explained the COA is initiated by the property owner; there is the COA Matrix and if approved, whatever alteration they want to do follows that matrix . This was done to try to make it where staff has some leeway to make it easier for property owners so staff could approve a COA quickly instead of the public hearing process. There are some items the HPC reviews and then the Commission reviews demolition over 20% of contributing structures. Commissioner Sandbergen inquired if someone wanted to purchase a house that had a designation could they opt out or are they required to keep it. Ms . Knighting advised if it is in the district it is in the district and it would be very obvious in the purchase process, they were purchasing a home in a Local Historic District or a Local Landmark . Commissioner Sand bergen asked why the downtown is not included in this noting the focus is on residential. Ms. Knighting explained there is no Historic District in mind right now; that is not on the table. The HPAC did hire Kimley Horn and wanted to survey the entire city of all historic structures; however, that is not plausible. What they did was create a heat map and found the oldest structure in the city and began getting grants to survey the oldest structures in the city; that is how that happened. Most cities like Dunedin and older cities already had this survey done 25-8

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission for years and years and they are now updating their surveys. The HPAC was really just trying to see what is out there. Commissioner Sandbergen noted not only does the Commission have to consider removing the City Manager from the process; the boards and committees now have term limits so, the way this is viewed could change going forward. He is giving that a lot of thought as to what works today may not be favorable going forward. Mayor Freaney, while most of the questions have been asked she did ask when originally considered what was the approval percentage to create a Historic District. Ms. Knighting explained the very first version it was 100% for commercial structure property owners because of the significant zoning implications and then for residential it was 60%. After the Commission workshops indicating concern the residential was changed to 100%. Mayor Freaney asked the reason the HPAC was taken out as an initiator. Ms. Knighting noted that was a Commission major concern that was discussed at the workshop for another entity designating properties which prompted the 100% owner and a failsafe with the City Manager. This has evolved over many months. Mayor Freaney noted many of the concerns from the Commission and where this has evolved has really been about making sure to the extent they thought the City should or can ease the minds of property owners and asked if that is accurate the concerns for the property owners. Ms. Knighting responded absolutely. Mayor Freaney addressed the issue of a City Manager taking property rights. City Manager Bramley responded, explaining: . The City Manager is the CEO of the City. In terms of an application for a Historic District, the City Manager is tasked and responsible for enforcement of all laws within the City of Dunedin. Theirs is a City Commission/City Manager form of government in which the City Commission sets the policy and the City Manager is appointed to run the day-to-day operations of the City. She related the many and significant responsibilities of a City Manager and noted the education required including a master's degree being preferred and in Dunedin years of management experience and a credentialed City Manager in the International City Management Association, where number one is everything done is in the public interest. The City of Dunedin will always have a professional administrator in this position. As far as the City Manager initiated Historic District, it will be the last thing she will pick up to do; the first thing would be to work with the property owners to try to get them to maintain the character of the community in that way. This is something that would not be taken lightly by anyone in the City Manager seat because potentially it could be career ending. There are very specific criteria and a very high bar and fundamentally the community has to be behind you. Also, it is a very arduous process to understand all the information and get through 3 public hearings to attain approval or not. It is interesting the City Manager initiated Historic District application was in order to have one thing in the tool box as a failsafe moving forward . It is not something she asked for or wanted; however, she thought it is an important tool to have and for future administrators to have to preserve the character of the City as a whole. The City's Strategic Plan talks in depth about the historic character of the city as a whole; it supports property values, feelings of community and almost everything the city is about moving forward. Whatever is going on it has to impact that in a very broad approach for a City Manager to initiate an application. 25-9

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Public Input Dunedin City Commission Mayor Freaney opened the item to public input. She reminded everyone to state their name and address, and they have 3 minutes; also, please no applause in order to be respectful of each side of the issue. Tom Bowers of 827 Victoria Drive made the following points: Dunedin residents since 1984 now have the responsibility of maintaining two historic homes. Since 1977 they have owned 14 older homes which they restored to their original designs or as close as possible. The homes on Victoria Drive they restored are 123 and 130 years old, which he described as being very close to their original state. He expressed concern regarding allowing the City Manager and staff to designate any area they desire as a Historic District and that would impose irreparable harm to the residents. None of the neighbors they have spoken to are in favor. Concerns include what future owners might do with the homes, hurricane damage beyond repair . Ryan Saunders of 250 Lyndhurst Street made the following points : Regarding a "failsafe" the burden remains on the residents. City Manager initiated Historic District process does not include the vote of the people. The timeline for the process is not defined and when the application starts, permits stop. The burden is on the homeowner after the fact for their property rights . He presented a scenario of a home being destroyed and not being able to build back to resident's current needs, the neighbor does not like it and the City Manager initiates the application which stops all exterior changes are restricted even if the district is never approved, during that time everyone is stuck. There is already a Historic Preservation Committee and an Architectural Review Committee and if neighbors want to preserve the area they can apply on their own individually and voluntarily; that process already exists as well as the 100% in the ordinance. He proposed taking the Local Planning Agency recommendation after significant discussion and many points made and heard. If not, the Commission should provide an explanation including the process and the time residents have to argue an exclusion for themselves and how much of their own money they have to put up; and what if they are out of town and miss that 14-day notice and how the potential sale of the home will be affected. Deborah Kynes of 265 Edgewater Drive commented: She recused herself from the Local Planning Agency (LPA) process because it was an adjudicatory process even though quasi-judicial; it is a Legislative issue , because she wanted to be clear and fair. No one can intervene and take property, not the neighbor that is false and out of the ordinance. She is in favor of the 100% in that the best historic districts will come about organically, possibly 2 or 3 houses at a time and that is okay; the next number of houses might opt out; then the next 3 or 4 houses will be their own historic district. The State reimbursed the cost of the survey that was mentioned and was under the Certified Local Government, of which there are 86 in Florida out of 441 cities, towns and villages. It links Federal, State and Local. 25-10

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission There is no intervener status; there is a significant process with criteria that are from the Federal level in order to voluntarily designate. Voluntary historic preservation is how it should be. Terry Hopkins of 200 Cevera Drive made the following points : He has worked on what was previously called the History Committee for five to six years on this same project of getting the Boat Club as a historic designation. Finally, they are getting there. Regarding the City Manager part in this, it is the City Commission that will make the final decision. If citizens don't like that then those Commissioners won't be there; there will be someone else. He sees no problem with the City Manager having a small part in the process. Paul Gionis of 159 Beltrees Street made the following points: Being a lawyer, he has heard some things of concern. Irreparable harm in the context of the historic district would be changing one home, the dormer or the windows because that historic home is no longer the same ; it can't be fixed with money . He referred to numerous surveys and the reference to districts; these documents create the evidentiary basis to create the districts. Concern for the 14-day notice versus the 30-days and only have to notify the exterior of the district and there is no time before it is done. Concern that the City Manager if given the authority will use it. This does not add value; only if it is grass roots and not when it is imposed on people. Rob Cozen of 1417 Chesterfield Drive made the following points : He noted the City's Mission Statement and the number one was Historic Preservation. That becomes critical as Dunedin stops being the best kept secret in Florida . He spoke about the Dunedin Boat Club and its property and questioned who would make application because it is City owned property. He asked the Commissioners to help that property be designated historic so that they can rebuild their property . Hillary Gionis of 159 Beltrees made the following points : She and her husband restored their home that is on their own. Concern for making the process more difficult for people to rebuild. The discussion should be about what should be done in case there are storms like there were last year. Sylvia Tsekas of 51 Main Street made the following points: She and her husband have invested in Dunedin for 37 years and all their properties are in the district being discussed. They take the initiative to restore and maintain their property; not having someone telling them what they have to do and putting on restrictions . As a realtor she is seeing it seems the property values are coming down because of the economy; restrictions lead to not seeing the buyers wanting to purchase. Doug Lewis of 104 7 Victoria Drive made the following points: His concern is having the City Manager as the stop gap in this; nothing to do with the current City Manager or Commission, but the future and unintended consequences. 25-11

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission The homeowners should have 100% authority over the ir home; there are enough rules and worries about their homes. Everyone they have talked to in their neighborhood, no one is in favor of this and do not want anyone to force them to be in a historic district. He is okay if it is 100% voluntary , otherwise he is against it. David Ballard Gettis Jr. of 802 Georgia Avenue made the following points : He expressed concern for the scenario of having a histo ric home and there being a Legislative statutory requirement to upgrade the household plumb ing to include modern day plumbing reclaimed water for indoor use such as laundry and toilet use based on Dana Young's HB639. Would that still qualify as a historic preserved home. What if he voluntarily wanted to upgrade his plumbing as referenced in Statute 381 .0065 modernizing the home , would he still qualify as a historically preserved home. Based on Melon i's Water Code Section 1.13 , what if they dictated every home and required every home that reclaimed water must be used indoors as based on Statute 163 .3167 Section 1.d., would such modern-day upgrades still allow for falling under a historic home, tapping into such reclaimed water contrivances how does that effect as historically preserved homes. Amy Connors of 937 Victoria Drive made the following points : They checked to see if their home had a historic designation before buying it and would not have purchased it if it did, and if they did, would not have paid as much as they did . After muc h research they were told the home was in disrepair, some said they came to conv in ce them to keep the or iginal structures; however , they could not say that after the inspect ion . From the outside no one wou ld have known that. They demolished the home and held an auction and sold off any piece of the home that locals wanted with 100% of the proceeds going to the Dunedin History Museum. They moved into their newly built home using current materials and materials from the original home that is up to current code in Flood Zone A, with hurricane hardening materials in a safe and secure home they would not have been able to do had it been designated a historical landmark. They support any neighbors who wish to establish their home as a historic landmark ; however, she encourages people to act on their own behalf for their specific property and under no circumstance should any other government entity, volunteer committee, museum staff or resident be authorized to request a historical designation on their property, individually or as part of a district or neighborhood. The only person who should be able to request a designation on real property is the property owner. She requests that this language be amended promptly because it is already on the Historic Preservation page of dunedin .gov that includes staff members and History Museum can start the process . Autumn Malagies of 1121 Victoria Drive (The Dunedin Cottages) made the following points: Her family moved to Dunedin in 1978; she moved away for 11 years and came home to make an investment in property that is unique with unique zoning, Single Family, Multifamily, Tourist Facility and Comme rcial property . She bought it for the zoning and she is 26 years into a 30-year plan . Today she feels the City of Dunedin is pulling the rug from her feet. She wants to be able to do with her property what she wants now and tomorrow and she should have that right. She put everything into her property and into the city for people to 25-12

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission come and visit. No one entity should be able to come in and take the investment she has made away. Her concern is regarding the City Manager ability to designate her property and she can no longer do what she wants with the property. John Shine of 217 Aberdeen Street made the following points: He lives next door to a historical home. His concerns included the points of discussion including bad actor, good actor, rogue City Manager, irreparable harm noting the opinions and legal terms that are not black and white but often are gray; but not gray is taking someone's rights to their own home. His research using Al indicated the past Commissions voted against a City Manager's recommendation 0%. He gave two examples of the City forcing property owners to make their homes historic. Mayor Freaney stated in her 40 years of experience in the city, the City Commission voted against the City Manager recommendations many times. Brent Irish of 969 Victoria Drive made the following points: Their property is in full restoration right now and is about 10 feet in the air. They also own a historic home on Scotland. They chose this city because of its character and community. They feel a designation should be a voluntary decision and not forced. John Harrison 234 Lyndhurst Street made the following points: Historic designation permanently changes property rights and that of property owners. It limits what can be done for repairs and adds additional costs. The decision should never be left in the hands of an unelected official; it should be up to the homeowners to choose. An eComment was submitted by Brian Adams: Please carefully consider the presentations and positions advocated by Ryan Saunders with respect to the historic designation issue. Of greatest concern to me is the City authority or power to create such a designation that is not in alignment with residents wishes and which does not respect the concerns raised by residents. The designation should only be enacted for residents who desire the designation. It should not be forced on residents who oppose the designation. An eComment was submitted by Lorraine Snipper: The Agenda for this item says that staff recommends that the Commission pass the Ordinance 25-02. This is completely contrary to what happened at the LPA meeting on July 9th, wherein a vote was taken, 5-1, to recommend passing the Ordinance with the removal of the City Manager initiation of the historic district application. This Ordinance as attached to the Agenda still provides the City Manager with the authority to unilaterally initiate the historic district application. Who is driving this bus? The Ordinance does not represent the view of the LPA, and the Commission had voted in March to move the Ordinance as written, at that time, to the LPA for evaluation. I sincerely hope that the Commission follows the LPA recommendation to remove any language giving the City Manager authority to make a historic district application. An eComment was submitted by Ryan Saunders: I strongly oppose Ordinance 25-02 as it still gives the City Manager 25-13

Regular Meeting Notes August7,2025 Dunedin City Commission power to initiate historic district applications WITHOUT 100% homeowner consent. The Local Planning Agency voted 5-1 to remove this authority, yet the version going to City Council ignores that recommendation. This power, combined with the existing Master Plan, creates an immediate pathway for city-initiated historic districts- triggering permit moratoriums that could delay repairs, rebuilding, or improvements, even after major storm damage. Residents deserve transparency, clear protections, and the right to decide if their homes should be part of a historic district. I urge the City Commission to strike the City Manager's initiation power and keep this program voluntary. Hearing and seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Freaney closed the public input. Response to Public Input Hurricane Damage/Building vs. Sustainability: When a Historic District is approved, along with that goes design guidelines for the district that will address what is compatible for alterations, exterior changes. While not on the table as it is not known what is happening; however, typically the design regulations these days are addressing resiliency and how that happens including how it looks when the building is raised and those types of alterations making it resilient but also compatible. Timeline and Notice Assurance: As written all property owners in the proposed district at the property owner's address listed at the Tax Collector Office. It just says the written notice must be provided. City Attorney Cowan advised: This is very similar to Code Enforcement. If residents are away from home and there is a Code Enforcement issue notice would be provided at the address listed at the Property Appraiser or Tax Collector office. Additionally, before it ever goes to a HPAC hearing or before the Commission there is not only the notice provided, but there is a sign posted in the yard and also a notice posted either at City Hall for HPAC or in the newspaper with regard to a local district. Irreparable Harm: City Attorney Cowan commented that even with historic homes there is a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) that allows for exchange of windows and so forth. She did not know that the example of exchange of windows would rise to that level. Ultimately, that is a determination made by the City Commission. It was acknowledged plumbing and so forth that is internal is not part of the issue; it is only exterior alterations. Boat Club Application: Boat Club application for historic designation would be made by the City of Dunedin. Applications: Currently as a Local Landmark application it is HPAC, City Commission, City Manager, Dunedin History Museum Staff can apply; that is being changed to only Property Owners. That is less burdensome. Commission Comments/Questions Vice Mayor Gow requested a review of the City Manager's application process, the timeline and the impact on the resident point of view. Ms. Knighting advised: 25-14

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission Once the City Manager initiates an application it gives a 60-day period for the Historic Preservation Committee for the first step where this application will be reviewed. City Attorney Cowan noted once the application is filed there are 5 business days where the City Manager must notify all the property owners. Ms. Knighting continued: Five days after in this theoretical situation where the City Manager applies for Historic District letters go out to people in the historic district; within 60 days there has to be the HPAC hearing. These historic district applications are not just a piece of paper; it is an evaluation of the structure by a professional and it says whether or not it meets the criteria and the boundary of this proposed district. It is a packet. After the HPAC the application follows the typical hearing process and the attempt was to keep those notice requirements the same as a rezoning. The ordinance simply says, the City Manager may apply for a Historic District. There is no process in place for before the City Manager files the application it first needs to be heard by the City Commission so that the Commission is aware of the process. Her professional thought is that it would add more time; however, it does provide for a little more transparency. There are pros and cons; she thought in that circumstance the faster the better because then it gets to the Commission for the ultimate decision, the public process starts. Vice Mayor Gow questioned a scenario where speed is of the essence noting that it is impacting the residents so, rushing it through has a negative connotation even for a good reason. Ms. Knighting commented it would be less time for it to drag out; however, she could see the point of view of giving people time to prepare the case . She noted currently if there is an open historic district application, permits are paused which could be a negative. Ms . Knighting in response to the question of if there was a way to build into the ordinance that the homeowners request that the application can be fast tracked because of the permitting issues; she explained staff did build in after the LPA questions about flood damage and so forth that the City Commission may adopt a resolution to remove the Permit Clause during a Historic District application. For example, there are issues with damage the City can keep the application in place or maybe a resolution that the Historic District process is not irreparable harm. She explained the HPAC review is within 60 days so, if time allows language could be added to make it the next cycle versus the 60 days . Commissioner Sandbergen inquired if Mr. Bowers' home close to the water had been destroyed if his new home would have to be elevated and FEMA compliant. Ms. Knighting acknowledged that was correct if the entire structure was gone it would have to follow the new FEMA building code. Commissioner Sandbergen asked if Ordinance 25-02 allows or does not allow the City Manager to initiate the action, the way it is being presented that the Commission will vote on. Ms. Knighting explained the ordinance in front of the Commission has the ability for the City Manager to apply for a Local Historic District. Commissioner Sandbergen asked if Ordinance 25-02 requires 100% voluntary of a property owner . Ms. Knighting explained there are two ways a Historic District application may be submitted. Either 100% Property Owner or City Manager with irreparable harm. 25-15

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Dunedin City Commission Commissioner Sand bergen clarified that City Manager initiated would not have to be 100% voluntary. He noted this is not the last City Manager Dunedin will ever have. Ms. Knighting explained the way it is currently written there are two ways a Historic District may come to staff and be accepted, either 100% Property Owner is on board, or the City Manager has applied for a Historic District and has to prove there is irreparable harm. Commissioner Sand bergen asked if Ordinance 25-02 the way it is written and in front of the Commission tonight what the LPA turned down in a 5 -1 vote. Ms. Sharp explained the LPA recommended approval with a vote of 5 - 1 of the ordinance as written with the condition that the language of the City Manager would be removed. City Manager Bramley noted to be clear it is a recommendation to the City Commission; it is not approval. The LPA is a recommending body, not a final authority. Commissioner Walker cited a scenario of a historically designated home or district and there is another series of bad hurricanes, extensive damage to the structures or the district and asked how that process works. His concern is does this COA still apply in that case. Ms. Knighting explained if there is a local historic landmark or local historic district and the owner is doing anything other than repairs they have to apply for and receive approval of a COA. Normal maintenance and repair. If for example half of an addition is taken down and they want to completely replace, that is a permit situation so probably a COA would be needed . In terms of bringing it up to Code, FEMA, elevate they would have to get a COA and depending on the level and whether the Matrix who approves that COA; the HPAC could approve or it could go the Commission . Vice Mayor Gow noted Ms. Kynes mentioned several times that she believed in 100% voluntary designation. He thought that did not address the issue being discussed. He asked in consideration of her experience on the HPAC if she would like to share her opinion on the City Manager initiation. Ms. Kynes commented: other jurisdictions have many, the Mayor, the Historic Preservation, the City Manager, many fail safes that they can come forward and initiate; it is initiate not designate. She reiterated there are 86 Certified Local Governments and each of them has come up with their ordinances on how they best want to handle historic preservation. She is totally for 100% voluntary, no intervener, no one. A neighbor cannot come up and say someone is going to designate a neighbor's house; that is nowhere in the ordinance. The failsafe is instead of say, the Mayor, Dunedin History Museum, the HPAC, the whole long list, they said in irreparable damage or extraordinary circumstances would there be one failsafe, one to be able to say. Irreparable damage is an actual term of art in the law. There was a multitude of people who could weigh in and that is gone . That is the one thing left as a failsafe and that is irreparable damage and that is a difficult circumstance to envision and say exactly what that circumstance would be and the law says I know pornography when I see it. It will be extraordinary circumstance, probably unforeseen and the City Manager could only initiate it and then it has to go through the entire process. That is for the Commission to struggle with; however, she sees with other CLG's having so many different fail safes and this has provided one. In the future she thought there may be a situation and that irreparable harm is a term of legal art. Commissioner Walker clarified with Mr . Irish his home does not have historic designation and that building resiliency changes to his home on Victoria Drive were completely voluntary. 25-16

Regular Meeting Notes August 7, 2025 Commission Comments Dunedin City Commission Commissioner Dugard commented on his understanding of the concerns expressed by residents and their desire to protect their homes. He insisted on 100% approval of homeowners because he felt everyone should have the right to say what happens to their homes. The City is not the only challenge, but the overall economic forces never before faced . If property is not protected by anything but zoning, buyers coming into the city can put anything there they want and could be right next door unless there is a historical designation, then the integrity of the community can be kept. This gives a tool to allow for protecting not only the home, but the community; there is no protection without this . This might not be the exact wording for a comfort level; but it is a process to allow for walking through it and oppose it if that is the choice. Commissioner Walker explained: He did a lot of research on the economic impact of historical preservation and even historical districts. In summary Florida alone a conservative estimate - $4.2 Billion in annual economic impact including heritage tourism , rehabilitation, Main Street initiatives and elevated property values. He provided information in some other communities that included numbers for job creation direct and indirect, heritage tourism spending annually and downtown reinvestment. His thinking is there is an economic impact to the program. Managed growth is what the city needs to achieve. In terms of this program it is preserving the city's history and through the retention of that cultural and charm of Dunedin it is also providing a positive economic impact to the city's businesses. While appreciating all the comments, it seems the feeling is fairly overwhelming in terms of making sure the programs is kept voluntary; not providing a perception of impacting property owner rights. He understands why the City Manager designation is in the ordinance. As Commissioner Dugard stated, zoning alone is not going to protect the city's historical preservation situation; however, looking at the likelihood of that scenario getting invoked and his reference is the current Commission, City Manager and City staff he does not see a scenario where it could possibly happen now; however, the future needs to be considered. His concern about the way this is written is "irreparable"; it is a legal term; however, there is no answer to what it is specifically. He cannot support the ordinance as it has been recommended by City staff. He read the LPA minutes three times, and he thinks the program can be maintained as it is, voluntary and take out the optics that the City has the ability to enforce; however unlikely scenario on the community. Vice Mayor Gow commented: He sees both sides; he also is one who talks incessantly about the definition of charm in the city that makes people want to move here and then it starts to change. There are corporations buying properties next to each other for the purpose of tearing down and rebuilding, all for profit seeing the market value. He spoke about how the city can protect itself while taking into consideration property rights. He agreed the goal should be to manage the growth . With no tools in the toolbox the concern is seeing historic homes go one by one. He spoke regarding the balance of property rights and the question of one homeowner's rights allowed to negatively impact the rights of a neighbor or community. He noted he was considering an amendment. 25-17

Regular Meeting Notes August?,2025 Dunedin City Commission Commissioner Sandbergen expressed appreciation to those residents who spoke noting he knows their homes and they are proud property owners, he heard and understood what they were looking for and he was in favor. Mayor Freaney commented: Regarding going from 60% to 100% because of consideration of property owner rights. The ability for the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee to start the application process was removed. She thought a lot has been done that other communities have not to make it as voluntary as possible. In terms of the threat, she thinks of corporate America with Dunedin being a popular place to buy up properties, especially in the multifamily areas and some residents who do not want this might be the ones asking for the City to do something to stop what they think will ruin their neighborhood and there had better be a failsafe. It will be that type of extraordinary irreparable harm with no failsafe and that would be a big mistake. When everyone sees it they will know it and want the City to do something. She noted this could be to preserve property rights. She commented no City Manager is going to just move forward unless everyone knows it when they see it and wish there was a failsafe. She wants safety; she has great respect for the Local Planning Agency and most of the time agrees; however, not in this case. She is in favor of staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Gow proposed an amendment to the motion that the City Manager has to advise the City Commission before taking action. City Manager Bramley inquired what form of notification and Vice Mayor Gow acknowledged that it would be at a publicly advertised City Commission Meeting. She would support advising the City Commission of her intent to initiate in a public forum and acknowledged it would not hinder the process . She noted if it were that impactful a special meeting could be called . City Attorney Cowan advised the amendment could be written into the process; it will lengthen it a little just from the standpoint of getting the five members of the Commission together if it is not happening just before a regular scheduled meeting . She had no concerns regarding the amendment suggested. Community Development Director Kinney commented: To the point about district really coming to fruition there are so many actions in place to protect the city from a charm perspective; the Commission has provided the tools to help get to that point. In terms of timing and some irreparable harm happening in the meantime; he did not know what that situation would be . City Manager Bramley commented there is that possibi li ty in having sufficient time, notice the City Commission meeting properly and that type of thing something could occur . That said she would like to between first and second reading talk with City staff about what it would look like and then bring back something acceptable to the Commission. City Attorney Cowan advised to move this item forward with the addition of notice to the Commission prior to the City Manager's initiation of the application. Commissioner Dugard accepted the amendment to the motion. Commissioner Walker accepted the amendment with the inclusion of at a public meeting . AMENDED MOTION 25-18

Regular Meeting Notes Dunedin City Commission August 7, 2025 MOTION: Motion was made by Commissioner Dugard an

1. PRESENTATIONS 2. CONSENT AGENDA 2.a Approve the Minutes for the: 2.b Board and Committee Appointments 2.c Award of Bid # 25-2515 for Skinner Blvd. Electrical Improvements for Undergrounding to KCI Construction Services, LLC, Tampa, FL dba KCI Communications Infrastructure in the amount of $172,992.25 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DUNEDIN CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVE AUGUST 7, 2025 6:00 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CITIZEN INPUT A. 6/5/2025 Regular Meeting B. 7/1/2025 Workshop EXHIBIT: A. 06-05-25 RM Minutes.pdf EXHIBIT: B. 07-01-25 Workshop Minutes.pdf A. Committee on Aging - Reappoint Stella Moya to a regular term ending 8/1/2028 - Reappoint Cara York to a regular term ending 8/1/2028 - Reappoint Maryanne Fisher to a regular term ending 8/1/2028 EXHIBIT: A. COA Roster.pdf Staff recommends approving the award of Bid #25-2515 Skinner Blvd. Electrical Improvements for Undergrounding to KCI Construction Services, LLC, Tampa, FL dba KCI Communications Infrastructure in the amount of $172,992.25 EXHIBIT: A. Background for August 7 2025 Commission Meeting_Skinner Undergrounding.pdf EXHIBIT: B. SKINNER BLVD UG OF PRIVATE PROPERTY POWER 06-16- 2025.pdf EXHIBIT: C. City of Dunedin Skinner Blvd Bid Award Notice Letter R1.pdf EXHIBIT: D. Bid 25-2515_KCI.PDF EXHIBIT: E. Skinner_Undergrounding_Purchasing Agent Memo.pdf EXHIBIT: F. Budget Adjustment_Skinner Undergrounding.pdf 1

2.d Approval of a GEC Service Authorization to Tetra Tech, Inc., in the amount of $149,694, for design, permitting, and bidding services for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Emergency Generator Building Rehabilitation Project. 2.e Award of a Maintenance Management System for the Public Works Department via "piggybacking" an agreement with the Town of Davie, FL - "ITN-RM-22-17" for a Planning, Work & Asset Management Software System, to Maintstar, Inc., in the amount of $110,500. 2.f Purchase of Two (2) Trailer Mounted Wastewater Bypass Pumps from Mersino Dewatering, LLC, of Jacksonville, FL, via "piggybacking" the Florida Sheriffs Association (FSA) Cooperative Purchasing Program, at a cost of $138,701.40. 3. ACTION ITEMS 3.a First Reading of Ordinance 25-02: Amending Chapter 111 of the Land Development Code, Historic Preservation Commission approval of the scope and fee for design, permitting, and bidding services for a General Engineering Consultant (GEC) Service Authorization for the WWTP Emergency Generator Building Rehabilitation Project to Tetra Tech, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, in a Not-to-Exceed (NTE) amount of $149,694; and to designate Jorge M. Quintas, P.E., Deputy City Manager, as the City's authorized designee to execute the Service Authorization. EXHIBIT: A. Purchasing Agent Memo - WWTP Gen Building Rehab.pdf EXHIBIT: B. GEC Service Authorization Tetra Tech- WW-3-25.pdf EXHIBIT: C. BA BT - WWTP Gen Building Rehab.pdf EXHIBIT: D. Human Trafficking Affidavit.pdf Commission approval of the award of a Maintenance Management System with MaintStar, Inc., of Irvine, CA, via "piggybacking" with the same terms and conditions as the Town of Davie, FL - "ITN-RM-22-17 New Enterprise Assessment Management System (EAM) Work Order System" agreement, and approval to issue a Purchase Order (PO), in the amount of $110,500. EXHIBIT: A. Purchasing Agent Memo - Piggyback Agreement for COD PW Planning, Work & Asset Management Software.pdf EXHIBIT: B. MaintStar Software Licensing (LSA) Price Proposal for the COD.pdf EXHIBIT: C. Dunedin - MaintStar Piggyback Agreement.pdf EXHIBIT: D. MaintStar - Budget Information for PW Improvement of Operations.pdf Approve the purchase of Two (2) Trailer Mounted, Global 6-inch Wastewater Bypass Pumps & Accessories from Mersino Dewatering, LLC, of Jacksonville, FL, via "piggybacking" the FSA Cooperative Purchasing Program (Contract FSA23- EQu21.0), at a cost of $138,701.40. EXHIBIT: A. Purchasing Agent Memo.pdf EXHIBIT: B. Mersino Quote - FSA SALE DUNEDIN.pdf EXHIBIT: C. FSA Contract FSA23-EQu21.0 - (6-in. Pump Bid Pricing).pdf EXHIBIT: D. BA-BT Request Form (By-Pass Pumps) - (signed).pdf Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 25-02. EXHIBIT: A. Ordinance No. 25-02 - amending chapter 111(18066.9).pdf EXHIBIT: B. Resolution 25-13 COA Matrix.pdf EXHIBIT: C. COA Matrix Adopted 2019.pdf 2

3.b First Reading of Ordinance 25-06: City Commission Salary Adjustment 3.c First Reading of Application DR-2025-0001 - Request for Design Review Approval for the development of an affordable multifamily residential housing project called The Flats on Main Street consisting of 78 apartments on 3.34 acres of property located at 1419, 1421, 1422, 1440, 1445 Carnation Drive and 1150 Friendly Lane. 3.d Resolution 25-19 authorizing an increase of Reclaimed Water User Rates; establishing a surcharge for the use of such water during the months of February through June of each year; establishing the amount of Capital Cost Recovery (CCR) fee; providing that reclaimed water service may be discontinued for failure EXHIBIT: D. June 11, 2025 LPA Meeting Minutes.pdf EXHIBIT: E. July 9, 2025 LPA Draft Meeting Minutes.pdf EXHIBIT: F. March 4, 2025 City Commission Work Session Minutes.pdf EXHIBIT: G. 12.17.2024 City Commission Work Session Minutes.pdf EXHIBIT: H. City Commission Workshop Meeting Minutes- Combined.pdf EXHIBIT: I. City Commission Meeting Minutes- Combined.pdf EXHIBIT: J. Historic Preservation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes- Combined.pdf EXHIBIT: K. Historic Preservation Advisory Committee Workshop Minutes- Combined.pdf EXHIBIT: L. Historic Preservation Advisory Committee Annual Report- Combined.pdf EXHIBIT: M. Final_ORC_Report_12-14-2021.pdf EXHIBIT: N. FAQ For LPA.pdf EXHIBIT: O. Ord 25-02 City of Dunedin Business Impact Statement.pdf EXHIBIT: P. Proof of Notice.pdf Staff recommends Commission approval of Ordinance 25-06 at first reading. EXHIBIT: A. Ordinance 17-32 Establish Commission Annual Salary.pdf EXHIBIT: B. Ordinance 25-06 Establishing the Annual Salary of the City Commission.pdf EXHIBIT: SUPPLEMENT: C. City of Dunedin Business Impact Statement Ordinance 25-06.pdf Approval of DR-2025-0001 with conditions. Staff has determined that the application has met all of the applicable review criteria and the Local Planning Agency unanimously recommends this application for Commission approval. EXHIBIT: A. Application DR-2025-0001 - Staff Report EXHIBIT: B. Application DR-2025-0001 EXHIBIT: C. Aerial, Land Use & Zoning Maps EXHIBIT: D. Aerial Map of Surrounding Properties & Uses EXHIBIT: E. 6/19/2025 ICE Review of TIA EXHIBIT: F. The Flats on Main Street Design Modifications and Compatibility Review EXHIBIT: G. 12/18/2024 DRC Meeting Notes EXHIBIT: H. 1/07/2025 ARC Meeting Minutes EXHIBIT: I. Ordinance 25-01 & Development Agreement EXHIBIT: J. Public Notices EXHIBIT: K. 07-09-25 LPA Minutes EXHIBIT: SUPPLEMENT: L. Memorandum R.Ironsmith.pdf 3

to pay reclaimed water charges; and repealing Resolution 04-06 in its entirety. 3.e Resolution 25-21 regarding Application No.25-04V, Request to Vacate an approximately 3,912 square foot (SF) existing platted Right-of-Way at 968 Douglas Ave, Dunedin, FL, as recorded in Plat Book 5 Page 66 of the Official Records of Pinellas County, FL. 3.f Resolution 25-28 Purchasing Policy Change 3.g Award the construction of the FY25 Wastewater Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project to TLC Diversified, Inc., of Palmetto, FL, in the total amount of $888,309.08. 3.h Addendum No. 2 for Construction Phase Professional Services to the contract with Commission adoption of Resolution 25-19 authorizing an increase of Reclaimed Water User Rates; establishing a surcharge for the use of such water during the months of February through June of each year; establishing the amount of CCR fee; providing that reclaimed water service may be discontinued for failure to pay reclaimed water charges; and repealing Resolution 04-06 in its entirety. EXHIBIT: A. Resolution 25-19 - Reclaimed Rates (Approved As To Form, JRC, BMO).pdf EXHIBIT: B. Raftelis - W & WW Rate Study (05-22-25) - [1st PH].pdf EXHIBIT: C. Example Utility Bill (Existing & New).pdf Commission adoption of Resolution 25-21, and approval of Application No. 25-04V, Vacating a platted Right-of-Way, approximately 3,912 square feet (SF) in size, located at 968 Douglas Ave, Dunedin, FL, in order to clear the cloud on the property's title. EXHIBIT: A. Resolution 25-21 Vacation of Right-of-Way 968 Douglas Ave (BMO Review)(870917.1).pdf EXHIBIT: B. Vacation of Easement Application.pdf EXHIBIT: C. Proof of Ownership.pdf EXHIBIT: D. Vicinity Map - 968 Douglas Ave - 6-5-25 v2.pdf EXHIBIT: E. Sketch of Proposed Area of Vacation.pdf EXHIBIT: F. Boundary Survey.pdf EXHIBIT: G. Letters of No Objection.pdf EXHIBIT: H. Letter of Notice Certificate of Mailing.pdf EXHIBIT: I. Notice of Public Hearing.PDF Staff is requesting the item be tabled. EXHIBIT: A. Resolution 25-28 with Purchasing and Procedure Manuel.pdf EXHIBIT: B. Current Purchasing and Procedure Manual with Modifications .pdf Award the construction of the FY25 Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project to TLC Diversified, Inc., (TLC) of Palmetto, FL, in the total amount of $888,309.08, via "piggybacking" Pinellas County's "Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Repair, Rehabilitation, & Improvements FY 2025-FY2028 Pinellas County Contract (#24- 0073-ITB-C). EXHIBIT: A. Purchasing Agent MEMO - Lift station Rehabs 2025.pdf EXHIBIT: B. TLC LS Rehab Quote 2025.pdf EXHIBIT: C. Piggyback Agreement for LS #6, 17, 27, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 (signed by JRC).pdf EXHIBIT: D. Anti-Human Trafficking Affidavit.pdf EXHIBIT: E. Map of FY25 Lift Station Rehabs.pdf 4

Engineering Design Technologies, Corp., (EDT) of Tampa, FL, for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Electrical Systems Upgrade Project, for a 'Not to Exceed' (NTE) amount of $396,159; and the City Wide Lift Station Control Panel Replacement & SCADA System Upgrades, for a NTE amount $146,332; totaling $542,491 (NTE). 3.i The proposed agenda for the September 4, 2025, Commission Meeting. 4. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 4.a Commission Discussion and Comments 4.b City Clerk's Update 4.c City Manager's Update 4.d City Attorney's Update Commission approval of Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with Engineering Design Technologies, Corp., (EDT) of Tampa, FL, for professional services related to the WWTP Electrical Systems Upgrade Project (NTE $396,159); and the City Wide Lift Station Control Panel Replacement & SCADA System Upgrades (NTE $146,332); totaling $542,491 (NTE). EXHIBIT: A. EDT Professional Services Addendum 2 - WWTP Elec Upgrade.pdf EXHIBIT: B. EDT Professional Services Addendum 2 - City Wide LS Panel & SCADA.pdf EXHIBIT: C. EDT Original Scope and Fee - WWTP Elec Upgrade.pdf EXHIBIT: D. EDT Construction Observation Services Scope and Fee - Addendum 1.pdf Staff recommends approving the proposed agenda for the September 4 2025, Commission Meeting. EXHIBIT: A. Proposed Agenda September 4, 2025.pdf The Commission shares topics of concern, future issues they wish to address, events attended, announcements, and liaison updates. City Clerk's Update City Manager's Update EXHIBIT: A. Grant Procurement Tracking Form - NRCS_USDA - 2025 Ditch Clearing & Stabilization.pdf City Attorney's Update ADJOURN MEETING DUNEDIN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & DECORUM RULES Note: Please put cell phones and pagers on silent or vibrate during the meeting. This meeting is televised; therefore, you may appear on TV at any time. Public Appearance: CITIZEN INPUT is for comments from members of the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda for this meeting (please give name and address and limit all comments to a maximum of three minutes). AS FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA individual speakers are limited to a maximum of three 5

minutes. A Representative of a group consisting of 5 individuals who are present during the meeting may speak on behalf of the group for up to 10 minutes at the Chair's discretion. To do so, the individuals must have waived their time to the representative by providing their name and address on the back of the comment card. Public Hearings: During public hearings the Chair will open the agenda item to the public for comment. If you wish to comment come to the microphone at the podium and give your name and address for the record. Make all comments and queries to or through the Chair. This meeting is for agenda items only. Other issues should be presented to the City Manager or City Clerk for discussion at a future Commission meeting. Appeals: Per Florida Statute 286.0105 - If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Disability Provisions: It is the policy of the City of Dunedin not to discriminate against disabled persons in employment or the provisions of services. If you have a disability that requires accommodation, please notify the ADA Coordinator 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting at (727) 298-3042. COPIES OF THIS AND ALL COMMISSION AGENDAS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE, ON THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE. COPIES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT WWW.DUNEDINGOV.COM. 6

>> Mayor >> Mayor Freaney: >> Mayor Freaney: AUGUST >> Mayor Freaney: AUGUST 7, >> Mayor Freaney: AUGUST 7, 2025 >> Mayor Freaney: AUGUST 7, 2025 CITY >> Mayor Freaney: AUGUST 7, 2025 CITY COMMISSION >> Mayor Freaney: AUGUST 7, 2025 CITY COMMISSION MEETING. CITY COMMISSION MEETING. I'D LIKE TO SAY TODAY, WE HAD A I'D LIKE TO SAY TODAY, WE HAD A WONDERFUL CEREMONY AT PURPLE WONDERFUL CEREMONY AT PURPLE HEART PARK FOR OUR PURPLE HEART HEART PARK FOR OUR PURPLE HEART VETERANS. VETERANS. THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER WHO WAS A THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER WHO WAS A GENTLEMAN IN IRAQ WHO LOST HIS GENTLEMAN IN IRAQ WHO LOST HIS BEST FRIEND AND BOTH OF HIS BEST FRIEND AND BOTH OF HIS LEGS. LEGS. IT WAS VERY INSPIRATIONAL. IT WAS VERY INSPIRATIONAL. I THOUGHT IT SET THE TONE. I THOUGHT IT SET THE TONE. IT'S PURPLE HEART DAY. IT'S PURPLE HEART DAY. WE'RE GOING TO START WITH WE'RE GOING TO START WITH INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, JEN, CAN YOU DO ALLEGIANCE, JEN, CAN YOU DO THAT? THAT? >> YES. >> YES. >> YES. LET >> YES. LET US >> YES. LET US BEGIN >> YES. LET US BEGIN THIS >> YES. LET US BEGIN THIS MEETING >> YES. LET US BEGIN THIS MEETING BY LET US BEGIN THIS MEETING BY TAKING A MOMENT OF SILENT TAKING A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR THE FAMILY OF REFLECTION FOR THE FAMILY OF GREG GRACIE. GREG GRACIE. >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH JUSTICE AND LIBERTY FOR ALL. JUSTICE AND LIBERTY FOR ALL. >> Mayor Freaney: WE HAVE NO >> Mayor Freaney: WE HAVE NO >> Mayor Freaney: WE HAVE NO PRESENTATIONS >> Mayor Freaney: WE HAVE NO PRESENTATIONS TONIGHT. PRESENTATIONS TONIGHT. THE NEXT ITEM WOULD BE CITIZEN THE NEXT ITEM WOULD BE CITIZEN INPUT. INPUT. IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK, THREE IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK, THREE MINUTES. MINUTES. >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I LIVE >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I LIVE IN >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I LIVE IN PALM >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I LIVE IN PALM HARBOR, >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I LIVE IN PALM HARBOR, BASED >> DAVID BALLARD GEDDES, JR. I LIVE IN PALM HARBOR, BASED ON I LIVE IN PALM HARBOR, BASED ON ARTICLE 1, SECTION A, CLAUSE 17 ARTICLE 1, SECTION A, CLAUSE 17 BASED OFTEN THE U.S. BASED OFTEN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, DOES THE CITY CONSTITUTION, DOES THE CITY WITHIN ITS 10 MILE SQUARE WITHIN ITS 10 MILE SQUARE PERIMETER ALLOW BUSINESSES TO PERIMETER ALLOW BUSINESSES TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN AN ILL CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN AN ILL WRI W WILLED AND FRAUDULENT MANNER. WILLED AND FRAUDULENT MANNER. ALLOWING BUSINESSES TO BETRAY ALLOWING BUSINESSES TO BETRAY THEIR CUSTOMER BASE AND THEIR CUSTOMER BASE AND ULTIMATELY DENY THEIR ULTIMATELY DENY THEIR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AFTER CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AFTER BEING PAID TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES BEING PAID TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES LEGITIMATELY IN THAT CONTRACT LEGITIMATELY IN THAT CONTRACT TULLE OBLIGATIONS ARE BEING TULLE OBLIGATIONS ARE BEING RESPECTED. RESPECTED. AND PERFORMED HONORABLY, NOT TO AND PERFORMED HONORABLY, NOT TO DISRESPECT THE CUSTOMER. DISRESPECT THE CUSTOMER. NOT TO RECEIVE THE CUSTOMER WHO NOT TO RECEIVE THE CUSTOMER WHO PAID FOR SUCH TRUSTED PAID FOR SUCH TRUSTED PERFORMANCE. PERFORMANCE. MY FATHER HIRED AND PAID MY FATHER HIRED AND PAID ATTORNEY FREE BORN, ENTRUSTING ATTORNEY FREE BORN, ENTRUSTING HIM WITH HIS LAST WILL AND HIM WITH HIS LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT, IN THAT IT BE TESTAMENT, IN THAT IT BE HONORED, SIX MONTHS HAD PASSED HONORED, SIX MONTHS HAD PASSED BEFORE I WENT TO FREE BORN'S BEFORE I WENT TO FREE BORN'S OFFICE TO RETRIEVE MY FATHER'S OFFICE TO RETRIEVE MY FATHER'S WILL, THE LAST WILL AND WILL, THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT THAT FREE BORN'S WILL TESTAMENT THAT FREE BORN'S WILL AND TESTAMENT HANDED TO ME IS AND TESTAMENT HANDED TO ME IS NOT MY FATHER'S WILL, IT'S A NOT MY FATHER'S WILL, IT'S A FAKE. FAKE. I SUSPECT THAT MY MOTHER I SUSPECT THAT MY MOTHER CONSPIRED WITH FREEBORN, TO CONSPIRED WITH FREEBORN, TO BETRAY MY FATHER. BETRAY MY FATHER. JUST BECAUSE MY FATHER WAS JUST BECAUSE MY FATHER WAS ELDERLY DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN ELDERLY DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT MY FATHER DECIDE OF NATURAL THAT MY FATHER DECIDE OF NATURAL CAUSES. CAUSES. I SUSPECT MY MOTHER PLAYED A I SUSPECT MY MOTHER PLAYED A DIRECT ROLE IN MY FATHER'S DIRECT ROLE IN MY FATHER'S MURDER, POSSIBLY USING THE MURDER, POSSIBLY USING THE SEDATIVE KETAMINE AND REMOVING SEDATIVE KETAMINE AND REMOVING MY FATHER'S OXYGEN, ALLOWING HIM MY FATHER'S OXYGEN, ALLOWING HIM TO SUFFOCATE AND DIE WHILE BEING TO SUFFOCATE AND DIE WHILE BEING SEDATED. SEDATED. MY FATHER'S LIFE INSURANCE MY FATHER'S LIFE INSURANCE POLICY HAS ALSO SEEMED TO POLICY HAS ALSO SEEMED TO DISAPPEAR AS WELL. DISAPPEAR AS WELL. I WONDER WHAT FREEBIE MY MOM I WONDER WHAT FREEBIE MY MOM USED TO BRIBE FREEBORN, TO AGREE USED TO BRIBE FREEBORN, TO AGREE TO THE FORGERY OF MY FATHER'S TO THE FORGERY OF MY FATHER'S WILL SO MY MOTHER COULD HAVE WILL SO MY MOTHER COULD HAVE TIME TO DISSOLVE MY FATHER'S TIME TO DISSOLVE MY FATHER'S TRUST ACCOUNT, GIVING HER TIME TRUST ACCOUNT, GIVING HER TIME TO LIQUIDATE MY FATHER'S ASSETS, TO LIQUIDATE MY FATHER'S ASSETS, AND FURTHER STEALING HIS LIFE AND FURTHER STEALING HIS LIFE INSURANCE POLICY CLAIM IN HER INSURANCE POLICY CLAIM IN HER PROCESS. PROCESS. THIS IS AN INEXCUSABLE CRIME THIS IS AN INEXCUSABLE CRIME THAT WILL ULTIMATELY INCLUDE THE THAT WILL ULTIMATELY INCLUDE THE ACHILLES HEEL OF THE CITY ITSELF ACHILLES HEEL OF THE CITY ITSELF AS CONSTITUTED IN ITS FORT NIGHT AS CONSTITUTED IN ITS FORT NIGHT THEREIN, AND FREE BORN NEVER THEREIN, AND FREE BORN NEVER EVEN BOTHERED TO GIVE ME A COPY EVEN BOTHERED TO GIVE ME A COPY OF MY FATHER'S DEATH OF MY FATHER'S DEATH CERTIFICATE, AFTER HE WAS PAID CERTIFICATE, AFTER HE WAS PAID FOR THAT AS WELL. FOR THAT AS WELL. I HAVE A BIG PROBLEM HERE, AND I HAVE A BIG PROBLEM HERE, AND WE NEED TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF WE NEED TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF IT, THANK YOU. IT, THANK YOU. >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, DAVID, >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, DAVID, IF >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, DAVID, IF YOU >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, DAVID, IF YOU FEEL >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, DAVID, IF YOU FEEL THAT >> Mayor Freaney: THANK YOU, DAVID, IF YOU FEEL THAT STRONG, DAVID, IF YOU FEEL THAT STRONG, YOU MAY WANT TO GO TO THE YOU MAY WANT TO GO TO THE PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. OFFICE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TO AN ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK TO AN ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA? ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA? >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, I'M >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, I'M COMING >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, I'M COMING TO >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, I'M COMING TO SPEAK >> I'M GENERAL ANY THUNDERBIRK, I'M COMING TO SPEAK ABOUT I'M COMING TO SPEAK ABOUT REPAIRING THE WAY BRIDGE, I KNOW REPAIRING THE WAY BRIDGE, I KNOW OUR RESIDENTS WANT TO PROVIDE OUR RESIDENTS WANT TO PROVIDE THE CITY WITH THE PUBLIC THE CITY WITH THE PUBLIC EASEMENT ON OUR SIDE SO WE CAN EASEMENT ON OUR SIDE SO WE CAN GET THAT REPAIRED. GET THAT REPAIRED. AS WELL AS, WE HAVE SEVEN AS WELL AS, WE HAVE SEVEN CHILDREN IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. CHILDREN IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. OCCUR THROUGH ROAD IS EXTREMELY OCCUR THROUGH ROAD IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO CROSS. DANGEROUS TO CROSS. I KNOW WE HAVE THEM TRAVELING TO I KNOW WE HAVE THEM TRAVELING TO SCHOOL, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT SCHOOL, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THEM, AND JUST OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THEM, AND JUST OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BUYING ABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO GO BUYING ABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO GO TO THE CITY, TO GET ON THE TO THE CITY, TO GET ON THE TRAIL, WHICH IS PART OF WHY WE TRAIL, WHICH IS PART OF WHY WE LIVE WHERE WE LIVE, SO WE CAN LIVE WHERE WE LIVE, SO WE CAN RIDE THE TRAIL, AND GET TO THE RIDE THE TRAIL, AND GET TO THE DOWNTOWN SHOPPING, COMMERCE, DOWNTOWN SHOPPING, COMMERCE, WHAT NOT, SO I WANTED TO SPEAK WHAT NOT, SO I WANTED TO SPEAK TO THAT. TO THAT. AND ASK IF THERE'S ANYTHING AND ASK IF THERE'S ANYTHING BEING DONE TO CLEAN OUT CURLEW BEING DONE TO CLEAN OUT CURLEW CREEK IN ADVANCE OF HURRICANE CREEK IN ADVANCE OF HURRICANE SEASON. SEASON. I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING GOING ON I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING GOING ON OTHER THAN THE LIFT STATION, OTHER THAN THE LIFT STATION, WHICH I KNOW THEY WOULD LIKE THE WHICH I KNOW THEY WOULD LIKE THE BRIDGE TO BE OPEN AS WELL. BRIDGE TO BE OPEN AS WELL. BECAUSE THEY USED TO BE ABLE TO BECAUSE THEY USED TO BE ABLE TO TRAVERSE THE BRIDGE TO CHECK TRAVERSE THE BRIDGE TO CHECK BOTH SIDES LIFT STATION. BOTH SIDES LIFT STATION. IT'S MY BELIEF THE STRUCTURE IS IT'S MY BELIEF THE STRUCTURE IS FINE, IT JUST NEEDS NEW PLANKS FINE, IT JUST NEEDS NEW PLANKS TO BE REPLACED, AND THAT WAS TO BE REPLACED, AND THAT WAS BEING DONE IT SEEMED LIKE FOR 20 BEING DONE IT SEEMED LIKE FOR 20 YEARS, SO I'D JUST LIKE TO SEE YEARS, SO I'D JUST LIKE TO SEE IT OPEN AGAIN. IT OPEN AGAIN. >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK YOU, >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK YOU, AND >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK YOU, AND WE'LL >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK YOU, AND WE'LL ANSWER >> Mayor Freaney: OKAY, THANK YOU, AND WE'LL ANSWER YOUR YOU, AND WE'LL ANSWER YOUR QUESTION AS SOON AS ALL INPUT IS QUESTION AS SOON AS ALL INPUT IS DONE. DONE. ANYONE ELSE WISH TO COME FORWARD ANYONE ELSE WISH TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK TO AN ISSUE NOT ON THE AND SPEAK TO AN ISSUE NOT ON THE AGENDA? AGENDA? OKAY. OKAY. SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THAT, SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THAT, AND JENNIFER, ARE YOU ABLE TO AND JENNIFER, ARE YOU ABLE TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT CURLEW CREEK SAY ANYTHING ABOUT CURLEW CREEK CLEANING OUT OR. CLEANING OUT OR. >> I'M GOING TO ASK SUE BARTLETT >> I'M GOING TO ASK SUE BARTLETT >> I'M GOING TO ASK SUE BARTLETT TO >> I'M GOING TO ASK SUE BARTLETT TO COME >> I'M GOING TO ASK SUE BARTLETT TO COME UP. TO COME UP. >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE BRIDGE >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE BRIDGE WE'VE >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE BRIDGE WE'VE BEEN >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE BRIDGE WE'VE BEEN TALKING >> Mayor Freaney: THE WAY BRIDGE BRIDGE WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT BRIDGE WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IT BRIEFLY IN OUR BUDGET. IT BRIEFLY IN OUR BUDGET. IT'S SOMETHING THAT STAFF WILL IT'S SOMETHING THAT STAFF WILL BE COMING FORWARD WITH THE BE COMING FORWARD WITH THE OPTIONS OF COSTS AND WHAT CAN OPTIONS OF COSTS AND WHAT CAN AND CAN'T BE DONE THERE. AND CAN'T BE DONE THERE. SUE. SUE. >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK AREA >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK AREA WITH >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK AREA WITH A >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK AREA WITH A DRONE >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK AREA WITH A DRONE AND >> WE SURVEYED THE CURLEW CREEK AREA WITH A DRONE AND DOCUMENTED AREA WITH A DRONE AND DOCUMENTED THE SITUATION THERE. THE SITUATION THERE. WE SUBMITTED FOR A GRANT WE SUBMITTED FOR A GRANT CLEANING THAT. CLEANING THAT. AND ALSO EXPECT REIMBURSEMENT AND ALSO EXPECT REIMBURSEMENT FROM FEMA FOR SOME OF THAT, AND FROM FEMA FOR SOME OF THAT, AND SO WE -- THAT GRANT WAS ON HOLD SO WE -- THAT GRANT WAS ON HOLD AND BEEN RELEASED. AND BEEN RELEASED. WE'RE DOING A LOT OF WORK ALONG WE'RE DOING A LOT OF WORK ALONG WITH OUR MAINTENANCE STAFF. WITH OUR MAINTENANCE STAFF. WE DON'T HAVE A DATE, A START WE DON'T HAVE A DATE, A START DATE YET, BUT THE CITY ATTORNEY DATE YET, BUT THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS REVIEWED THE CONTRACT, AND HAS REVIEWED THE CONTRACT, AND THEN WE'LL BE COMING BACK BEFORE THEN WE'LL BE COMING BACK BEFORE YOU WITH A CONTRACT TO LET THAT YOU WITH A CONTRACT TO LET THAT WORK OUT. WORK OUT. THAT'S OUR PLAN. THAT'S OUR PLAN. WE'VE BEEN STEADY AT IT, AND WE WE'VE BEEN STEADY AT IT, AND WE HAVE -- WITH OUR MAINTENANCE HAVE -- WITH OUR MAINTENANCE STAFF, WE HAVE CLEANED OUT A STAFF, WE HAVE CLEANED OUT A COUPLE SMALL AREAS, IT'S REALLY COUPLE SMALL AREAS, IT'S REALLY BEYOND THE SCOPE OF WHAT WE HAVE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF WHAT WE HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO DO IN HOUSE, THE CAPABILITY TO DO IN HOUSE, WE'RE JUST MODDING ALONG, WE'RE JUST MODDING ALONG, REALLY, I KNOW IT SEEMS LIKE REALLY, I KNOW IT SEEMS LIKE THAT TO EVERYBODY OUT THERE, WE THAT TO EVERYBODY OUT THERE, WE ARE MOVING AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN ARE MOVING AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN TO GET THE TREES AND THE DEBRIS TO GET THE TREES AND THE DEBRIS CLEANED OUT OF THERE. CLEANED OUT OF THERE. >> THANK YOU, SUE, OBVIOUSLY, >> THANK YOU, SUE, OBVIOUSLY, >> THANK YOU, SUE, OBVIOUSLY, PEOPLE >> THANK YOU, SUE, OBVIOUSLY, PEOPLE ARE >> THANK YOU, SUE, OBVIOUSLY, PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED, >> THANK YOU, SUE, OBVIOUSLY, PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED, BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED, BECAUSE STORM SEASON IS HERE. STORM SEASON IS HERE. >> WE ARE TOO. >> WE ARE TOO. >> WE ARE TOO. >> >> WE ARE TOO. >> AS >> WE ARE TOO. >> AS SOMEONE >> WE ARE TOO. >> AS SOMEONE THAT >> WE ARE TOO. >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST >> WE ARE TOO. >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT >> WE ARE TOO. >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK IN >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK IN THEIR >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK IN THEIR HOUSE, >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK IN THEIR HOUSE, I >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK IN THEIR HOUSE, I UNDERSTAND >> AS SOMEONE THAT JUST GOT BACK IN THEIR HOUSE, I UNDERSTAND THE IN THEIR HOUSE, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS. CONCERNS. WE'RE MAKING SURE WE CAN DO WE'RE MAKING SURE WE CAN DO EVERYTHING WE POSSIBLY CAN DO. EVERYTHING WE POSSIBLY CAN DO. WE'LL GO TO THE CONSENT AAGAIN WE'LL GO TO THE CONSENT AAGAIN DE, AND THE CONSENT AGENDA, IS DE, AND THE CONSENT AGENDA, IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE 6/5/2025 REGULAR MEETING AND THE 6/5/2025 REGULAR MEETING AND THE 7/1/2025 WORKSHOP. 7/1/2025 WORKSHOP. BOARD AND COMMITTEE BOARD AND COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS. APPOINTMENTS. WE HAVE AWARD OF BID 25-2515 FOR WE HAVE AWARD OF BID 25-2515 FOR SKINNER BOULEVARD. SKINNER BOULEVARD. ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR UNDERGROUNDING TO KCI UNDERGROUNDING TO KCI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, TAMPA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, TAMPA FLORIDA DOING BUSINESS AS KC FLORIDA DOING BUSINESS AS KC CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION. 2D, APPROVAL OF GEC SERVICE 2D, APPROVAL OF GEC SERVICE AUTHORIZATION TO TETRA TECH FOR AUTHORIZATION TO TETRA TECH FOR DESIGN, PERMITTING AND BIDDING DESIGN, PERMITTING AND BIDDING FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. PLANT. 2E ISSAGE AWARD OF A MAINTENANCE 2E ISSAGE AWARD OF A MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM VIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM VIA PIGGYBACKING WITH AN AGREEMENT PIGGYBACKING WITH AN AGREEMENT WITH THE TOWN OF DAVEY, FLORIDA. WITH THE TOWN OF DAVEY, FLORIDA. 2F, PURCHASE OF TWO TRAILER 2F, PURCHASE OF TWO TRAILER MOUNTED WASTEWATER DEWATERING MOUNTED WASTEWATER DEWATERING PUMPS OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. PUMPS OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. AT THE COST OF 13,701.40. AT THE COST OF 13,701.40. THAT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. THAT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. DOES ANYONE WANT TO PULL DOES ANYONE WANT TO PULL ANYTHING? ANYTHING? >> MAYOR, CAN WE PULL 2E, >> MAYOR, CAN WE PULL 2E, >> MAYOR, CAN WE PULL 2E, PLEASE? PLEASE? >> Mayor Freaney: 2E. >> Mayor Freaney: 2E. >> Mayor Freaney: 2E. THAT'S >> Mayor Freaney: 2E. THAT'S BEEN >> Mayor Freaney: 2E. THAT'S BEEN PULLED. THAT'S BEEN PULLED. ANYTHING ELSE? ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY, SO ABSENT 2E, COULD I HAVE OKAY, SO ABSENT 2E, COULD I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? A MOTION TO APPROVE? >> SO MOVED. >> SO MOVED. >> SO MOVED. >> >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> >> SECOND. >> Mayor >> SECOND. >> Mayor Freaney: >> SECOND. >> Mayor Freaney: LET >> SECOND. >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME >> SECOND. >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK >> SECOND. >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE IS >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE IS ANY >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE IS ANY PUBLIC >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE IS ANY PUBLIC INPUT >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE IS ANY PUBLIC INPUT ON >> Mayor Freaney: LET ME ASK IF THERE IS ANY PUBLIC INPUT ON ANY THERE IS ANY PUBLIC INPUT ON ANY OF THOSE ITEMS ON OUR CONSENT OF THOSE ITEMS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA, IF THERE IS, PLEASE COME AGENDA, IF THERE IS, PLEASE COME FORWARD, SEEING NO ONE, I'LL FORWARD, SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE PUBLIC INPUT ON THAT. CLOSE PUBLIC INPUT ON THAT. AND I JUST WILL DO A VOICE VOTE. AND I JUST WILL DO A VOICE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR? ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> AYE. >> AYE. >> >> AYE. >> Mayor >> AYE. >> Mayor Freaney: >> AYE. >> Mayor Freaney: ANY >> AYE. >> Mayor Freaney: ANY OPPOSED? >> Mayor Freaney: ANY OPPOSED? >> Mayor Freaney: ANY OPPOSED? THAT >> Mayor Freaney: ANY OPPOSED? THAT PASSES >> Mayor Freaney: ANY OPPOSED? THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. OKAY, SO WE'LL GO BACK TO 2E. OKAY, SO WE'LL GO BACK TO 2E. WHICH IS THE ASSET MANAGEMENT WHICH IS THE ASSET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE SYSTEM. SOFTWARE SYSTEM. SO VICE MAYOR, DID YOU WANT A SO VICE MAYOR, DID YOU WANT A FULL PRESENTATION OR JUST SOME FULL PRESENTATION OR JUST SOME QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS? >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT MIGHT >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT MIGHT LEAD >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT MIGHT LEAD TO >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT MIGHT LEAD TO A >> JUST SOME QUESTIONS, THAT MIGHT LEAD TO A PRESENTATION. MIGHT LEAD TO A PRESENTATION. I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE'LL SEE HOW I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE'LL SEE HOW IT GOES. IT GOES. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. >> >> OKAY. >> I >> OKAY. >> I KNOW >> OKAY. >> I KNOW WE'VE >> OKAY. >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN >> OKAY. >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT SOFTWARE >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT SOFTWARE TO >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT SOFTWARE TO BASICALLY >> I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT SOFTWARE TO BASICALLY HELP ABOUT SOFTWARE TO BASICALLY HELP US BE A LITTLE MORE EFFICIENT IN US BE A LITTLE MORE EFFICIENT IN MANAGING PROJECTS, AND IS THAT MANAGING PROJECTS, AND IS THAT WHAT THIS SOFTWARE IS? WHAT THIS SOFTWARE IS? >> SUE BARTLETT, PUBLIC WORKS >> SUE BARTLETT, PUBLIC WORKS >> SUE BARTLETT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, >> SUE BARTLETT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, MISSED >> SUE BARTLETT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, MISSED THAT >> SUE BARTLETT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, MISSED THAT BEFORE. DIRECTOR, MISSED THAT BEFORE. YES, THAT IS CORRECT. YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A FULL >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A FULL DAY >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A FULL DAY BUDGET >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A FULL DAY BUDGET CONVERSATION, >> I'M JUST WONDERING, AFTER A FULL DAY BUDGET CONVERSATION, IS FULL DAY BUDGET CONVERSATION, IS THIS SOMETHING THAT -- COULD WE THIS SOMETHING THAT -- COULD WE ACCOMPLISH THE SAME RESULTS BY ACCOMPLISH THE SAME RESULTS BY USING THE SOFTWARE WE HAVE. USING THE SOFTWARE WE HAVE. >> WE CANNOT. >> WE CANNOT. >> WE CANNOT. WE >> WE CANNOT. WE HAVE >> WE CANNOT. WE HAVE WORKED >> WE CANNOT. WE HAVE WORKED WITH >> WE CANNOT. WE HAVE WORKED WITH THEM, >> WE CANNOT. WE HAVE WORKED WITH THEM, WE WE HAVE WORKED WITH THEM, WE HAVE MET WITH THEM, AND THEY HAVE MET WITH THEM, AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE SPECIFIC FEATURES DON'T HAVE THE SPECIFIC FEATURES THAT WE NEED IN ORDER TO PLAN THAT WE NEED IN ORDER TO PLAN THE WORK, AND THEN COMPARE THE THE WORK, AND THEN COMPARE THE WORK TO THE PLAN, AND, WORK TO THE PLAN, AND, THEREFORE, WE CAN'T USE THAT THEREFORE, WE CAN'T USE THAT TOOL TO GAIN THE SAME TOOL TO GAIN THE SAME EFFICIENCIES. EFFICIENCIES. IT'S A VERY EFFECTIVE FINANCIAL IT'S A VERY EFFECTIVE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, BUT AS WORK MANAGEMENT, SYSTEM, BUT AS WORK MANAGEMENT, AND THE NEEDS WE HAVE, TO PLAN AND THE NEEDS WE HAVE, TO PLAN AND TRACK AGAINST THAT WORK, IT AND TRACK AGAINST THAT WORK, IT DOESN'T HAVE THOSE FEATURES. DOESN'T HAVE THOSE FEATURES. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. AND >> OKAY. AND I >> OKAY. AND I GUESS >> OKAY. AND I GUESS IT'S >> OKAY. AND I GUESS IT'S ON >> OKAY. AND I GUESS IT'S ON THE >> OKAY. AND I GUESS IT'S ON THE AGENDA AND I GUESS IT'S ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT, BECAUSE YOU ALL FEEL TONIGHT, BECAUSE YOU ALL FEEL YOU NEED IT? YOU NEED IT? >> ABSOLUTELY. >> ABSOLUTELY. >> ABSOLUTELY. WE >> ABSOLUTELY. WE DO >> ABSOLUTELY. WE DO BELIEVE >> ABSOLUTELY. WE DO BELIEVE THAT >> ABSOLUTELY. WE DO BELIEVE THAT WE >> ABSOLUTELY. WE DO BELIEVE THAT WE WILL >> ABSOLUTELY. WE DO BELIEVE THAT WE WILL -- WE DO BELIEVE THAT WE WILL -- ACTUALLY, WE HAVE IN OUR PLAN, ACTUALLY, WE HAVE IN OUR PLAN, TO PAY FROM THIS SOFTWARE FROM TO PAY FROM THIS SOFTWARE FROM THE EFFICIENCIES THAT WE THE EFFICIENCIES THAT WE ACHIEVE. ACHIEVE. >> ALL RIGHT. >> ALL RIGHT. >> ALL RIGHT. THANK >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THAT'S >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THAT'S ALL, >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THAT'S ALL, MAYOR. THANK YOU, THAT'S ALL, MAYOR. >> Mayor Freaney: ANYONE ELSE, >> Mayor Freaney: ANYONE ELSE, >> Mayor Freaney: ANYONE ELSE, COMMISSIONER >> Mayor Freaney: ANYONE ELSE, COMMISSIONER SANDBERGEN? COMMISSIONER SANDBERGEN? >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A COMPANY >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A COMPANY OR >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A COMPANY OR -- >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A COMPANY OR -- WHAT >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A COMPANY OR -- WHAT DOES >> IS MAIN STAR, IS THAT A COMPANY OR -- WHAT DOES THAT COMPANY OR -- WHAT DOES THAT WORD MEAN? WORD MEAN? >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND OF >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND OF TO >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND OF TO JUMP >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT >> THAT IS A COMPANY, YES. >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF JUST >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF JUST SAID, >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF JUST SAID, IT >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF JUST SAID, IT WAS >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF JUST SAID, IT WAS DISCUSSED >> KIND OF TO JUMP ON WHAT JEFF JUST SAID, IT WAS DISCUSSED WITH JUST SAID, IT WAS DISCUSSED WITH ANYONE IN THE I.T. DIVISION OF ANYONE IN THE I.T. DIVISION OF THE CITY? THE CITY? I MEAN, DO THEY AGREE THAT THIS I MEAN, DO THEY AGREE THAT THIS IS THE PATH FORWARD? IS THE PATH FORWARD? >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE I.T. >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE I.T. DEPARTMENT, >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE I.T. DEPARTMENT, THEY >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE I.T. DEPARTMENT, THEY HAVE >> WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE I.T. DEPARTMENT, THEY HAVE BEEN I.T. DEPARTMENT, THEY HAVE BEEN WITH US ALL ALONG. WITH US ALL ALONG. THEY WANT US TO MEET OUR THEY WANT US TO MEET OUR BUSINESS NEEDS. BUSINESS NEEDS. THE COMPANY WAS PROPERLY VETTED THE COMPANY WAS PROPERLY VETTED THROUGH I.T. FOR SECURITY THROUGH I.T. FOR SECURITY CONCERNS, IT'S A HOSTED CONCERNS, IT'S A HOSTED SOLUTION, WEB SOLUTION. SOLUTION, WEB SOLUTION. IT WILL BE HOSTED NOT IN OUR -- IT WILL BE HOSTED NOT IN OUR -- IN OUR CITY, BUT -- SO YES, WE IN OUR CITY, BUT -- SO YES, WE HAVE BEEN HAND IN HAND PARTNE