BWP Board Meeting - Sep 03, 2026 (Agenda)

CITY OF BURBANK BURBANK WATER AND POWER BOARD SEPTEMBER 03, 2026 A regular meeting of the Burbank Water and Power (BWP) Board will be held on September 03, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. in the board room on the third floor of the BWP Ron E. Davis Administration Building – 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California. This facility is disabled accessible. Auxiliary aids and services are available for individuals with speech, hearing, or visual impairments (48-hour notice is required). To make arrangements, please contact Armando Casillas via email at ACasillas@burbankca.gov or by phone at (818) 238-3550. Interpretation Requests: If you would like to participate in public comments and require an interpreter, please telephone the City Clerk’s Office at (818) 238-5851 at least 48 hours before the meeting. Si desea participar en los comentarios públicos y necesita un intérprete, por favor llame a la Oficina de la Secretaría Municipal al (818) 238-5851 al menos 48 horas antes de la reunión. Եթե ցանկանում եք մասնակցել հանրային մեկնաբանություններին և թարգմանիչ եք պահանջում, խնդրում ենք զանգահարել քաղաքապետարանի գրասենյակ՝ (818) 238-5851 հեռախոսահամարով հանդիպումից 48 ժամ առաջ Each member of the public will have a total of three minutes to speak regarding the business of the utility and have the option to participate in the meeting in person and/or telephonically for general public comment, provided that the board reserves the right to adjust the time if there is a large number of speakers. The public may also submit written comments regarding the business of the utility by emailing BWPBoard@burbankca.gov by noon on the regular meeting date. To speak during public comment, members of the public may speak for three minutes in person in the board room on the third floor of the BWP Ron E. Davis Administration Building – 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California, or by calling 818-238-3627. Members of the public who attend the meeting in person will speak first, and those who choose to call in will speak once those in-person attendees have completed. AGENDA 1. FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS During this portion of the agenda, any person may address the board on any matter concerning the department’s business or any item on tonight’s agenda. 4. BOARD AND STAFF RESPONSE TO ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 5. GENERAL MANAGER REPORT The General Manager will provide updates on any notable events.

Burbank Water and Power Board – September 03, 2026 Agenda Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR The board may pull any of the listed consent items for further discussion, which will take place at the end of the reports to the board. A. MINUTES The board may approve the minutes of the regular meeting on August 06, 2026. Recommendation Approve as submitted. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 7. PRESENTATIONS A. WATER PIPELINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT: USING DATA TO PRIORITIZE RENEWAL Bassil Nahhas, Principal Civil Engineer-BWP, will present on Burbank Water and Power’s water pipeline condition assessment. B. CITY OF BURBANK GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND 2024 GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY UPDATE Drew Johnstone, Sustainability Officer, will present the City of Burbank’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Implementation and 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update. C. OVERVIEW OF BURBANK WATER AND POWER’S OPERATIONAL TECHNOLOGY’S ONEBURBANK PROGRAM Daniel Lippert, Manager Technology, will present on Burbank Water and Power’s Operational Technology’s ONEBurbank Program. 8. REPORTS TO THE BOARD A. APPROVE AND AWARD BID SCHEDULE NO. 1544 TO BRYTEMOVE ENERGY FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES Andres Azarian, Senior Administrative Analyst, will present on Bid Schedule No. 1544 for electric vehicle charging station design-build services. Recommendation Staff recommends that the BWP Board approve and award the contract documents for Bid Schedule No. 1544 for Electric Vehicle Charging Station Design/Build Services to Brytemove Energy in the amount of $1,200,000 and authorize the BWP General Manager to execute the contract and any other ancillary documents, including amendments, in form and substance satisfactory to the City Attorney’s Office and up to an amount available within the City Council approved Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget. B. APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH BURNS & MCDONNELL WESTERN ENTERPRISES, INC., FOR AN OLIVE POWER PLANT REPOWER ALTERNATIVES STUDY Sean Kigerl, Power Production Manager, will present on a Professional Services Agreement with Burns & McDonnell for an Olive Power Plant Repower Alternatives Study.

Burbank Water and Power Board – September 03, 2026 Agenda Page 3 Recommendation Staff recommends that the BWP Board authorize the General Manager of BWP, as a designee of the City Manager, to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Burns & McDonnell Western Enterprises, Inc., to prepare an Olive Power Plant Repower Alternatives Study. 9. INFORMATION FROM STAFF A. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE – none. B. CUSTOMER SERVICE UPDATE – none. C. WATER DIVISION UPDATE – none. D. POWER SUPPLY UPDATE – none. E. SUSTAINABILITY UPDATE – none. F. ELECTRIC SERVICES UPDATE – none. G. COMMUNICATIONS & OUTREACH – Armand Canyon 10. COMMENTS AND REQUESTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS 11. ADJOURNMENT The next regular board meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 01, 2026.

Burbank Water and Power Board – August 06, 2026 Meeting Minutes 1 BURBANK WATER AND POWER BOARD MINUTES OF MEETING AUGUST 06, 2026 Mr. Cherry called the meeting of the Burbank Water and Power Board to order at 5:00 p.m. in the third-floor board room of the BWP Ron E. Davis Administration Building, 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California. Mr. Cherry called for the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL BOARD PRESENT: Mr. Altman; Mr. Cherry; Mr. Eskandar; Mr. Luddy; Mr. Malotte; Mr. Nielsen; Mr. Smith BOARD ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Ms. Samra, General Manager-BWP; Mr. Riad, Chief Assistant General Manager-BWP; Mr. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Water Systems; Mr. Lillio, Chief Financial Officer; Mr. Wilson, Assistant General Manager- Operational Technology; Mr. Aquino, Assistant General Manager- Customer Service Operations; Mr. Johnstone, Sustainability Officer; Mr. Casillas, Power Resources Manager; Ms. Kurihara, Senior Assistant City Attorney; Mr. Beckett, Water Construction and Maintenance Superintendent; Ms. Meza, Senior Secretary ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Mensing began his comment by expressing his frustration with the .25-cent-per-session ChargePoint fee he previously brought to the Burbank City Council. Mr. Mensing also commented on billing discrepancies associated with his BWP utility bill. BOARD AND STAFF RESPONSE TO ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Johnstone responded to Mr. Mensing’s public comment by highlighting similar disappointment with the ChargePoint fee and noted that BWP is exploring alternatives to proceed with a less costly service provider. Mr. Sleiman stated that Mr. Aquino would address the billing discrepancies that Mr. Mensing brought to the Board by the end of the evening. SELECTION OF THE BWP BOARD CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR It was moved by Mr. Eskandar, seconded by Mr. Luddy, and carried 6 – 0, with Mr. Smith abstaining, to appoint Mr. Smith as the BWP Board Chair. It was moved by Mr. Malotte, seconded by Mr. Eskandar, and carried 6 – 0, with Mr. Altman abstaining, to appoint Mr. Altman as the BWP Vice-Chair. 6A. UNAPPROVED

Burbank Water and Power Board – August 06, 2026 Meeting Minutes 2 GENERAL MANAGER REPORT Mr. Sleiman began the General Manager Report by congratulating the newly elected Board Chair and Board Vice-Chair, and then presented the outgoing Board Chair, Mr. Cherry, with an award in appreciation for his time and dedication serving as the Board’s Chair. Mr. Sleiman continued with the report by informing the Board of recent cybersecurity concerns affecting water utilities within the United States, clearly noting that BWP is not one of the affected utilities. Mr. Sleiman reassured the Board and the public of the processes in place at BWP, should a situation of this nature occur. Lastly, Mr. Sleiman briefly noted to the Board that the topic of data centers will be discussed by the Burbank City Council at a later date, and encourages the public to tune in or participate in the City Council’s public comment period. FISCAL AND FINANCIAL TRAINING FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS (SENATE BILL 827) Mr. Casillas informed the Board of the Fiscal and Financial Training for Public Officials, which was sent by the Burbank City Clerk’s Office on July 22, 2026, and noted that the training must be completed within 30 days. Mr. Casillas and Ms. Kurihara responded to board member questions. CONSENT CALENDAR MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Eskandar, seconded by Mr. Cherry, and carried 6 – 0, with Mr. Malotte abstaining, to approve the meeting minutes of the regular meeting of June 04, 2026. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR REPORTS TO THE BOARD BURBANK WATER AND POWER’S OPERATIONS AND FINANCIALS REPORT Mr. Lillio presented Burbank Water and Power’s quarterly financial report for the period January to March 2026. Mr. Lillio, Ms. Samra, Mr. Sleiman, and Mr. Aquino responded to board member questions. INFORMATION FROM STAFF WATER DIVISION UPDATE Mr. Wilson updated the Board on MWD’s latest storage levels, the Northern Sierra’s precipitation levels, and the Colorado River. Mr. Wilson also updated the Board on the San Diego County Water Authority’s agreement with the City of Burbank and the Southern California Regional Water Authority Joint Powers Authority agreement. Mr. Wilson responded to board member questions.

Burbank Water and Power Board – August 06, 2026 Meeting Minutes 3 SUSTAINABILITY UPDATE Mr. Johnstone updated the Board on the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing option item that was going to the City Council on the August 25, 2026, meeting. Mr. Johnstone also updated the board on the Native Garden Kit Program. Ms. Kurihara, Mr. Johnstone, and Mr. Sleiman responded to board member questions. COMMENTS AND REQUESTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS Mr. Altman commented on BWP’s communication, specifically noting a recent incident near his place of residence involving a BWP staff member having the Burbank Police accidentally being called on them by one of Mr. Altman’s neighbors. Mr. Cherry asked staff whether there was a possibility of regular updates to the Board on the partnership between BWP and Warner Brothers regarding the International Broadcast Center for the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games. Mr. Smith thanked the Board for the nomination of the BWP Chair position. Mr. Smith welcomed Mr. Nielsen to the Board and welcomed Mr. Malotte again for his reappointment to the Board. Mr. Smith also requested that an Operational Technology update be done at a future Board meeting to highlight the work done in that division. Mr. Nielsen noted it was nice to meet everyone and that he is looking forward to the next Board meeting in September. Mr. Eskandar thanked Mr. Smith for representing the Board before the City Council by supporting fellow board members seeking reappointment and appointment to the Board. ADJOURNMENT The regular meeting was adjourned at 6:52 p.m. The next regular board meeting is scheduled for September 03, 2026, and will be held in the third-floor board room at Burbank Water and Power Ron E. Davis Administration Building. Armando Casillas Mandip Kaur Samra Power Resources Manager General Manager-BWP Recording Secretary Secretary to the Board Brian Smith, BWP Board Chair

1 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 2026 TO: Burbank Water and Power Board FROM: Mandip Kaur Samra, General Manager, Burbank Water and Power BY: Drew Johnstone, Sustainability Officer SUBJECT: City of Burbank Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Implementation and 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Burbank Water and Power Board (Board) provide staff with feedback, if any, on the City of Burbank’s (City) Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GGRP) status and greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory update. BACKGROUND The City’s GGRP Update was adopted by the Burbank City Council (Council) at the May 3, 2022 Council meeting. The GGRP is a long-range planning document that guides the City toward long-term greenhouse gas emission reductions in accordance with the State’s goals, such as Senate Bill (SB) 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: emissions limit), which established a statewide target to reduce GHG emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. The GGRP estimates timeframes for implementation of each action, from 1-3 years, 4-6 years, to 7-9 years. The Implementation section of the GGRP Update directs staff to establish a mechanism to monitor the plan’s progress and regularly analyze the status of emissions reduction actions to confirm targets are being met. As part of the GGRP implementation, staff prepare an annual status report and community-wide greenhouse gas inventory (Attachment 1). The City has a publicly accessible online dashboard called CAPDash, which allows the public to easily find the status of GGRP measures and GHG inventory results that interest them. Additionally, the addendum of the GGRP status report has qualitative updates from staff for each GGRP measure and action (Attachment 2). WATER AND POWER 7B.

2 Tracking emission reductions and the progress of actions provide a regular mechanism to track successes and find areas for improvement that will feed into future GGRP updates. If it is determined that specific measures are not feasible, new or revised measures can be included in future updates to incorporate best practices and meet the City’s long-term targets. DISCUSSION Between the adoption of the GGRP Update in May 2022 and the development of this status report in mid-2026, the City has made meaningful strides in implementing the GGRP. The City has completed 14 measures, 54 are ongoing, and 55 are still pending. The attached GHG inventory and implementation status report with key accomplishments highlight progress on the GGRP strategies, measures, and actions across all City departments. The implementation of the adopted GGRP measures and the preparation of this report required collaboration and communication among departments to ensure the measures are addressed in a way that best utilizes available City resources. Aside from implementing the adopted measures and actions, developing the GGRP status report and GHG inventory requires significant staff time and consultant resources. The City engaged Rincon Consultants to collect and review calendar year 2024 data to update the GHG inventory, and prepare a summary-of-results memorandum. Rincon also entered the verified results into the City’s public CAPDash dashboard. City emissions are the lowest they’ve been in over 30 years, but significant work remains to meet the stated goal of reducing emissions by 40% from 1990 levels by 2030. The City’s communitywide GHG emissions for 2024 were estimated at 1,067,347 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e), approximately 2.3% below the 2022 levels, and about 13% below the 1990 baseline of 1,223,465 MT CO2e. The City’s 2030 target is to reduce emissions 40% below 1990 levels, down to 734,000 MT CO2e total or 7 MT C02e per capita, requiring further significant reductions in the years ahead. Attachment 1 summarizes community GHG emissions across key inventory years and sectors and compares performance against City climate targets. COMMUNITY OUTREACH The development of the initial GGRP Update was a citywide, collaborative effort between City staff, City Council, Boards, Commissions, and the public. The 2026 GGRP status report and 2024 greenhouse gas inventory have been shared with the public through presentations at City Boards and Commissions, posted on the City’s website, and will be shared in digital newsletters and on social media. A public online dashboard called CAPDash (https://www.burbankca.gov/web/community-development/climate-action-

3 plan) is now available to view the quantitative status of Burbank’s community-wide greenhouse gas inventory and the status of the GGRP’s measures and actions. Attachment 2 highlights the qualitative progress made by applicable City departments on the GGRP strategies, measures, and actions. Staff will continue outreach and education to enhance community awareness of the individual measures in the GGRP. This includes monthly staff updates at the Sustainable Burbank Commission, an improved presence on the City website, more frequent updates on social media and in newsletters, as well as community workshops. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City of Burbank for receiving this report. The City had previously allocated funds in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Adopted Budget to cover consultant fees and staff time to prepare the GHG Inventory and to support the ongoing implementation of the GGRP. As conveyed to the Council at the adoption of the GGRP Update, implementing the full GGRP Update is estimated to cost $2 billion over 20-plus years. It’s a large number that includes large-scale transformation of the City’s energy supplies and public infrastructure projects. Half of the total investment includes Burbank Water and Power’s pre-planned investments in renewable and carbon-free electricity projects to reduce emissions from electricity generation while meeting state mandates. Other major investments, such as those for water and civil infrastructure, were also pre-planned before the GGRP Update and are included in the GGRP because they are synergistic. Some measures will be funded through various impact fees, state and federal funds, and grant programs, which will offset the actual cost to the City. The implementation of each strategy, measure, and action item is reviewed and considered by the Council as part of its overall review of the annual budget and the department's work plans. City staff will continue to seek funding for opportunities as they become available. CONCLUSION Burbank is making progress toward meeting the goals established in the GGRP to reduce GHG emissions to achieve a safe, beautiful, and thriving community, particularly those associated with resource use and development, and to incorporate resilience and adaptation strategies into planning for smart growth. The 2024 GHG inventory and this accompanying status report reflect the ongoing commitment of all City departments to advance climate action in alignment with the GGRP’s strategies and the State’s long-term decarbonization goals.

4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board provide staff with feedback, if any, on the City’s GGRP status and GHG inventory update. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 – City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Attachment 2 – Key Accomplishments and GGRP Implementation Status Updates

Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90012 213-788-4842 1 2/27/2026 Project No: 25-18398 Drew Johnstone, PMP, CEM City of Burbank 275 East Olive Avenue Burbank, California 91502 Via email: DJohnstone@burbankca.gov Subject: City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update, Summary of Results 275 East Olive Avenue, Burbank, California 91502 Dear Drew: This memorandum provides a summary of the results for the City of Burbank (the City) 2024 community greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory update. In accordance with established GHG accounting protocols and state guidance, the GHG inventory focuses on community-wide emissions from residents and commercial operations within the city and is organized by sector. The inventory includes sources within each sector that are under some degree of jurisdictional control by the City. Additionally included is a comparison of GHG inventory results for the years 2010, 2019, 2022, and 2024 and an analysis of observed GHG emission trends for each sub sector. In general, this inventory update was completed following the same methodology as deployed for all past City inventories. A brief section on the inventory methodology and any updates made to previous GHG inventories are detailed below. Rincon developed the 2024 GHG inventory so the City can track the trajectory of their GHG emissions and accurately compare the changes across different GHG emission sectors and track progress with GHG reduction strategies over time. Methodology The following sections describe the framework used to calculate and report communitywide GHG emissions and any updates to calculation methodologies used in current or prior GHG inventories. ICLEI Community Protocol Calculation and Reporting Framework Consistent with state guidance and in alignment with previous GHG emissions inventories, the 2024 GHG inventory, follows the calculation and reporting standards outlined in Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) United States Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Community Protocol).1 Under the Community Protocol, GHG emissions from community activities can be classified into the following six sectors:  Building Energy  On-road Transportation  Off-road Equipment  Water  Wastewater 1 ICLEI. July 2019. U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available at: https://icleiusa.org/us- community-protocol/ATTACHMENT 1A1-1

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 2  Solid Waste GHG emissions were calculated by multiplying the activity data in each GHG emissions sector by an associated emission factor. Activity data refers to the relevant measured or estimated level of GHG- generating activity (e.g., energy consumption, vehicle miles traveled). Emission factors are observation- based conversion factors used to equate activity data to generated GHG emissions. Additionally, the inventory used global warming potential (GWP) values for methane (CH 4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) consistent with the latest version of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment Report 5 (IPCC AR5). The 2024 GHG inventory covers the relevant emissions sources within the boundary of the City of Burbank (i.e., city limits). Sectors not present in the city, like agriculture, have not been included. The GHG inventory, therefore, reflects emissions sectors the community contributes to and over which the City has some degree of jurisdictional control and influence. Sectors where the City’s jurisdiction has limited influence are excluded from the 2024 GHG Inventory, as the City does not have the authority to develop GHG reduction measures to impact those associated GHG emissions. This method of exclusion for the emissions boundary aligns with Community Protocol standards and is recommended by state guidance for inventory, forecast, and targets setting.2 Exclusions include sectors such as industrial energy use and oil and gas equipment which are regulated by county, state, federal, and/or other governing bodies and not by the City. Previous GHG Inventories The following sections describe updates made to prior inventory calculation methodologies to ensure alignment with the best available data, models, and analytical approaches applied in the 2024 GHG inventory. On-road Vehicles Factors – EMFAC2025 Update and Revised Bus VMT The California Air Resources Board (CARB) recently released an updated version of the on-road emission factor model3 (EMFAC), the model used to develop emissions factors for different vehicle types. In alignment with the 2024 GHG inventory update, the 2010, 2019, and 2022 GHG inventories were updated to leverage the latest on-road emission factor model EMFAC2025. Previous GHG inventories used CARB’s EMFAC2021. Major changes between models included updates to underlying data that is used to estimate electric vehicle EV share, electricity per mile for EVs, and emission factors (MT CO 2e/vehicle mile traveled [VMT]) for passenger, commercial, and bus vehicle types. Model changes occur because CARB continuously incorporates the latest data on fleet composition, vehicle turnover rates, technology improvements, regulatory standards, fuel carbon intensity, and real-world performance. EMFAC2025 reflects updated assumptions about accelerated EV adoption, improvements in internal combustion engine efficiency, revised heavy-duty vehicle activity data, and changes to California’s regulatory environment. The on-road emission factors used in the inventory represent a weighted average of the vehicle fleet operating within the region. For passenger vehicles, this fleet includes a mix of gasoline-powered internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, hybrid vehicles, plug-in hybrid vehicles, and battery electric vehicles (EVs). While EV adoption has increased significantly in recent years, ICE vehicles still comprise the 2 Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI). 2023. Chapter 8, Climate Change. Available at: https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_C8_final.pdf. 3 California Air and Resources Board (CARB). 2025. EMission FACtor (EMFAC2025 v2) Model. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/msei/on-road-emfacATTACHMENT 1A1-2

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 3 majority of the on-road fleet. Emission factors are calculated as a blended average across all vehicles in operation, and therefore the growing share of EVs results in gradual reductions to the overall emission factor. Even where EV adoption increases substantially in a given year, the continued dominance of ICE vehicles in the total fleet moderates the magnitude of emission factor reductions. For commercial vehicles, particularly medium- and heavy-duty trucks, EV penetration remains limited relative to passenger vehicles. Although zero-emission truck deployments are beginning to expand, most commercial vehicle activity is still powered by diesel or gasoline engines. As a result, commercial vehicle emission factors reflect minimal influence from electrification at this time, and reductions are driven primarily by improvements in engine efficiency, turnover to newer model-year vehicles, and cleaner fuel standards rather than large-scale fleet electrification. As a result, an increase in GHG emissions attributable to the net rise in emission factors across all vehicle types was approximately 12 percent in 2010, 13 percent in 2019, and 16 percent in 2022. Table 1 below depicts the level of change to all on-road vehicle factors derived from updates between EMFAC2021 and EMFAC2025 models. Table 1 On-road Vehicle Factor Changes Resulting from Updates between EMFAC2021 and EMFAC2025 Vehicle Type Year EV Share Change EPM Change (kWh/VMT) EF Change (MT CO2 e/VMT) Passenger 2010 -11.00% -12.46% 11.56% Passenger 2019 12.31% -1.66% 11.89% Passenger 2022 1.43% -2.19% 13.06% Commercial 2010 – – -1.03% Commercial 2019 – – 1.96% Commercial 2022 – – 7.36% Bus 2010 -39.52% 0.00% 1.55% Bus 2019 -1.45% 0.00% -1.30% Bus 2022 601.25% -11.44% -5.54% Notes: EV = electric vehicles; EPM = electricity per mile; EF = emission factor; kWh = kilowatt-hour; VMT = vehicle miles traveled; MT = metric tons; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalents. Additionally, bus VMT for all prior GHG inventory years (i.e., 2010, 2019, and 2022) was revised to correct an undercount in previous analyses and use of updated data from Replica4. Using revised data to update 2010 and 2019 bus VMT, and interpolating between 2019 and 2024 values to estimate 2022 bus VMT, the updated methodology increased estimated bus activity across all inventory years. Specifically, bus VMT for 2010 and 2019 approximately tripled relative to prior estimates, while 2022 bus VMT increased by approximately 176 percent. These revisions resulted in corresponding increases in on-road transportation GHG emissions for each inventory year. Despite this adjustment, GHG emissions associated with bus VMT continue to represent a relatively small share of the communitywide inventory—on average 4 Rincon has used Replica to estimate VMT in the city in previous and current GHG inventories because it provides a comprehensive, behavior- based travel dataset derived from anonymized mobile device location data, census information, and transportation network data that captures real-world trip patterns across all modes. Replica’s modeled outputs reflect locally specific travel behavior allowing for more geographically precise and activity-based VMT estimates than traditional regional growth-factor methods. The platform also enables consistent year-over-year comparisons using a standardized methodology, making it a reliable data source for estimating communitywide on-road activity in GHG inventories.ATTACHMENT 1A1-3

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 4 accounting for less than two percent of total community GHG emissions across the 2010-2024 GHG inventories. Table 3 shows the updated activity data and GHG emissions from the on-road transportation sector for all years. Off-road Vehicles and Equipment Fuel Usage – OFFROAD Update Recently CARB released on updated version of the off-road vehicles and equipment model5, the model used to estimate activity data associated with offroad equipment. In alignment with the 2024 GHG inventory update, the 2010, 2019, and 2022 GHG inventories were updated to leverage the latest OFFROAD v1.1.2. Previous GHG inventories used CARB’s OFFROAD v1.0.5. Major changes between models included updates to the level of fuel consumption for several off-road sectors. Model updates occur because CARB periodically incorporates improved activity data, revised equipment population estimates, updated load factors and usage assumptions, and enhanced methodologies for estimating fuel consumption and emissions. OFFROAD v1.1.2 reflects refinements to statewide equipment inventories, updated regulatory assumptions (e.g., turnover and emissions standards), and improved calibration using more recent survey and fuel data. In addition to the OFFROAD model update, prior GHG inventories were revised to better align emissions attribution with the defined community boundary. As a result of these changes, GHG emissions from the off-road vehicles and equipment sector decreased by approximately 130 percent in 2010, 104 percent in 2019, and 62 percent in 2022. While OFFROAD model updates contributed to these changes, the main driver of these GHG emission reductions was the exclusion of industrial equipment fuel consumption. Table 3 shows the updated activity data and GHG emissions from the off-road vehicles and equipment sector for all years. Wastewater Processing – Activity Data and Allocation Updates During preparation of the 2024 GHG inventory, the City of Burbank’s wastewater systems team provided updated information regarding wastewater service allocation for the City of Burbank. The majority of influent treated at the Burbank Water Reclamation Plant (BWRP) originates from the Burbank community; however, the facility also treats flows from other jurisdictions within Los Angeles County. In the 2010, 2019, and 2022 GHG inventories, GHG emissions associated with wastewater activity data (e.g., Biological Oxygen Demand, BOD 5) were allocated to the City of Burbank using a population-based methodology. For the 2024 inventory update, The City provided refined allocation data based on measured influent flow volumes, disaggregated between the Burbank service area and other contributing jurisdictions. Burbank’s percentage share of total influent flow in 2024 was used to improve the allocation of wastewater treatment GHG emissions attributed to the City. To ensure methodological consistency, this updated flow-based allocation approach was also applied to prior inventory years. Historical influent flow splits were not available, therefore it is assumed that Burbank’s proportional share of total plant influent in earlier years was comparable to the 2024 distribution. Similarly, in the 2010, 2019, and 2022 inventories, Burbank’s residential population was used as the primary activity metric for estimating separate wastewater processing and effluent discharge emissions. For the 2024 update, this metric was revised to use service population (i.e., residential population plus employment) to better reflect the total wastewater-generating population. This approach aligns with system demand by accounting for non-residential wastewater contributions associated with commercial activity. For consistency, this revised service population metric was also applied to prior inventory years. 5 California Air and Resources Board (CARB). 2025. EMission FACtor (EMFAC2025 v2) Model. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/msei/on-road-emfacATTACHMENT 1A1-4

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 5 As a result of the updated allocation methodology and activity data revisions, wastewater sector GHG emissions increased by approximately 69 percent in 2010, 107 percent in 2019, and 148 percent in 2022. Although the percentage changes are significant, wastewater-related emissions continue to represent a relatively small share of the communitywide inventory, averaging less than 0.5 percent of total community GHG emissions across the 2010–2024 inventories. Table 3 shows the updated activity data and GHG emissions from the wastewater sector for all years. Solid Waste Generation – 2022 Tonnage Update During preparation of the 2024 GHG inventory, the City of Burbank’s Public Works department provided a revised 2022 landfilled solid waste generation value (short tons). This value is used to estimate methane generation and processing emissions from landfilled solid waste. The 2022 activity data (short tons of landfilled solid waste) was revised from 90,483 to 95,680 short tons, resulting in a six percent increase in total GHG emissions from the solid waste sector in 2022. Table 3 shows the updated activity data and GHG emissions from the solid waste sector in 2022. Summary of Results In 2024, the City of Burbank emitted a total of 1,067,347 MT of CO2e from the sectors depicted in Table 2 and Figures 1 through 2 through below. The majority of GHG emissions, 50 percent, are attributed to on- road transportation sources. The main driver of GHG emissions from on-road transportation is fuel combustion from internal combustion vehicles, specifically passenger vehicles (89 percent of on-road GHG emissions), commercial vehicles (seven percent of all on-road GHG emissions), and buses (two percent of all on-road GHG emissions). GHG emissions from electricity used to charge EVs, predominately passenger EVs, make up about two percent of all on-road GHG emissions and about one percent of communitywide GHG emissions. Off-road vehicles and equipment make up four percent of communitywide GHG emissions, driven particularly by commercial end-uses such as construction equipment, portable engines, and generators. The second-largest contributor to communitywide GHG emissions is building energy use, including electricity and natural gas consumption. Combined, these sources account for approximately 42 percent of total communitywide GHG emissions, with electricity use making up 31 percent and natural gas making up 11 percent. Of total building energy emissions, approximately 52 percent are attributable to commercial electricity use, followed by 19 percent from residential electricity use, 16 percent from residential natural gas consumption, 10 percent from commercial natural gas consumption, and three percent from municipal electricity use. GHG emissions from the solid waste, water, and wastewater sectors emitted about four percent of communitywide GHG emissions. The major driver of GHG emissions from these sectors includes landfilled solid waste methane generation and processing, or 86 percent of all waste, water, and wastewater GHG emissions. The next driver of GHG emissions from these sectors includes fugitive nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater discharge, which contributed emitted 11 percent of all waste, water, and wastewater GHG emissions. The remaining three percent of GHG emissions from these subsectors is attributed to wastewater treatment and processing, and energy used for importing potable water.ATTACHMENT 1A1-5

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 6 Table 2 2024 Burbank GHG Emissions (MT CO 2e) Sector Subsector GHG Emissions (MT CO2 e) Percent of Total Building Energy 1 Residential Electricity 85,273 8% Commercial Electricity 233,640 22% Municipal Electricity 14,095 1% Sub Total 333,008 31% Residential Natural Gas 73,157 7% Non-residential Natural Gas 44,818 4% Sub Total 117,976 11% On-road Transportation On-road Passenger ICE 469,198 44% On-road Commercial ICE 36,425 3% On-road Bus ICE 11,419 1% Sub Total 517,042 49% On-road Passenger EV 12,020 1% On-road Commercial EV 64 <1% On-road Bus EV 143 <1% Sub Total 12,227 1% Off-road Vehicles & Equipment Off-road Diesel 25,696 2% Off-road Gasoline 13,387 1% Off-road Natural Gas 630 <1% Sub Total 39,713 4% Solid Waste Landfilled Waste 2 40,912 4% Waste to Energy 26 <1% Sub Total 40,939 4% Wastewater3 Lagoon Treatment Process 46 <01% Centralized Process w/o Nit/DeNit 231 <1% Effluent Discharge 5,291 <1% Collection and Treatment - - Sub Total 5,568 <1% Water4 Ground Water - - Imported Water 1,016 <1% Recycled Water - - Sub Total 875 <1% Total 1,067,347 100% Notes: Percentages may not add as expected due to rounding. MT = metric tons; CO 2e = carbon-dioxide equivalents; ICE = internal combustion engine; EV = electric vehicle; nit/deNit = nitrification/denitrification. 1. Building energy includes electricity transmission and distribution losses and removes EV charging electricity emissions; EV charging electricity emissions are captured under the transportation sector.ATTACHMENT 1A1-6

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 7 2. Landfilled waste includes processing emissions. 3. Collection and treatment emissions are assumed to be captured under building energy to avoid double counting. 4. Ground water and recycled water emissions are assumed to be captured under building energy to avoid double counting. Figure 1 2024 Burbank GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) On-road Transportation 50%Building Energy 42% Solid Waste 4% Offroad Vehicles & Equipment 4% Wastewater <1% Water <1%ATTACHMENT 1A1-7

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 8 Figure 2 2024 Burbank GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 469,198 36,425 12,020 11,419 143 64 233,640 85,273 73,157 44,818 14,095 40,912 26 25,696 13,387 630 5,291 231 46 875 0 MT 50,000 MT 100,000 MT 150,000 MT 200,000 MT 250,000 MT 300,000 MT 350,000 MT 400,000 MT 450,000 MT 500,000 MT On-road Passenger ICE On-road Commercial ICE On-road Passenger EV On-road Bus ICE On-road Bus EV On-road Commercial EV Commercial Electricity Residential Electricity Residential Natural Gas Non-residential Natural Gas Municipal Electricity Landfilled Waste Waste to Energy Off-road Diesel Off-road Gasoline Off-road Natural Gas Effluent Discharge Centralized Process w/o Nit/DeNit Lagoon Treatment Process Imported Water On-road Transportation Building Energy Solid Waste Off-road Vehicles & Equipment Wastewater WaterATTACHMENT 1A1-8

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 9 Historical Comparison Activity data and GHG emissions from the 2010, 2019, 2022, and 2024 GHG emissions inventories are presented in Table 3 below. 1990 GHG emission levels are assumed to be 15 percent below 2010 levels in alignment with the methodology used for setting targets in the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Update. Table 3 Historical GHG Emissions Comparison Sector Subsector 1990 2010 2019 2022 2024 Units Building Energy 1 Residential Electricity N/A 285,906,370 263,186,383 289,732,969 247,579,004 kWh Commercial Electricity 333,581,170 760,893,045 713,274,904 678,340,689 kWh Municipal Electricity 34,217,652 34,352,833 40,922,852 kWh Residential Natural Gas 16,669,699 15,542,432 13,680,650 13,773,526 therms Non-residential Natural Gas 12,602,381 9,931,959 8,419,662 8,438,070 therms Sub Total 738,809 578,995 535,396 450,983 MT CO2 e On-road Transportation On-road Passenger 1,119,823,456 1,143,186,523 1,064,180,526 1,283,260,384 VMT On-road Commercial 48,301,964 49,309,696 25,278,878 31,010,499 VMT On-road Bus 11,741,997 11,986,973 8,271,211 5,794,037 VMT Sub Total 623,875 558,773 469,806 529,269 MT CO2 e Off-road Vehicles & Equipment Off-road Diesel 1,069,775 2,120,049 2,666,934 2,469,710 gallons Off-road Gasoline 745,628 1,145,212 1,544,162 1,457,771 gallons Off-road Natural Gas 69,337 89,444 118,276 107,541 gallons Sub Total 18,389 33,103 42,622 39,713 MT CO2 e Solid Waste Landfilled Waste 2 85,254 90,932 95,680 103,733 tons Waste to Energy 43 80 80 81 tons Sub Total 33,638 35,890 37,762 40,939 MT CO2 e Wastewater3 Lagoon Treatment Process 1,991 2,032 2,199 2,339 kg BOD/dayATTACHMENT 1A1-9

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 10 Centralized Process w/o Nit/DeNit 189,021 237,496 286,976 272,556 service population Effluent Discharge 189,021 237,496 286,976 272,556 service population Collection and Treatment 687,184 863,415 1,043,630 1,188,006 kWh Sub Total 3,908 4,892 5,868 5,568 MT CO2 e Water4 Ground Water 8,796 9,778 12,450 11,877 AF Imported Water 7,852 5,865 3,419 2,442 AF Recycled Water NA NA 2,907 3,151 AF Sub Total 20,752 2,576 1,422 875 MT CO2 e Total 1,223,465 1,439,371 1,214,228 1,092,878 1,067,347 MT CO2 e Notes: Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. MT = metric tons; CO 2e = carbon-dioxide equivalents; ICE = internal combustion engine; EV = electric vehicle; nit/deNit = nitrification/denitrification. 1. Building energy includes electricity transmission and distribution losses and removes EV charging electricity emissions; EV charging electricity emissions are captured under the transportation sector. 2. Landfilled waste includes processing emissions. 3. Collection and treatment emissions are assumed to be captured under building energy to avoid double counting. Activity data for lagoon treatment (kg BOD5/day) and wastewater collection and treatment (kWh) are attributed to the City using the City's % share of influent into the BWRP. 4. Ground water and recycled water emissions are assumed to be captured under building energy to avoid double counting.ATTACHMENT 1A1-10

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 11 GHG Emissions Trends Changes in communitywide GHG emissions among the years 1990, 2010, 2019, 2022, and 2024 are depicted in Table 4 and Figure 3 below. Communitywide GHG emissions in Burbank have declined overall since peaking in 2010, despite fluctuations in certain sectors. Total GHG emissions increased between 1990 and 2010, reflecting population growth, economic expansion, and increased transportation activity. Since 2010, however, communitywide emissions have trended downward, with the most notable reductions occurring between 2010 and 2022. Emissions declined further by 2024, reaching about 13 percent below 1990 levels. While this reflects meaningful progress, additional reductions will be necessary for the City to achieve its state-aligned target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. While overall emissions have decreased over time, sector-level trends vary and reflect changes in energy supply, transportation behavior, economic activity, and waste generation patterns. Transportation By 2024, passenger vehicle travel rebounded as economic and social activity normalized following the pandemic. This rebound in VMT contributed to an increase in transportation emissions compared to 2022 levels. At the same time, EVMT has grown steadily as EV adoption increases, while ICE VMT remains the dominant share of total passenger travel. Although the share of EVMT is rising and contributing to lower per-mile emissions, overall passenger VMT growth continues to outpace the rate of fleet electrification. As a result, total transportation emissions remain sensitive to increases in driving activity. Emphasizing the shift from ICE to EVMT is critical, as sustained electrification, paired with reductions in total VMT, will be necessary to achieve deeper long-term reductions. Bus VMT, in contrast, has declined since the onset of the pandemic and has not returned to pre-2020 levels. Reduced ridership, service adjustments, and sustained remote work patterns have contributed to lower transit activity. While increased public transit use and active transportation are expected to increase mode share and reduce reliance on personal vehicles over time, current trends show bus VMT decreasing even as overall passenger VMT rises. This divergence underscores the importance of strengthening transit recovery and expanding active transportation options to offset continued growth in personal vehicle travel. Overall transportation emissions reflect the interplay between post-pandemic travel recovery, increasing EV adoption, and shifting mode share patterns across the community. Building Energy Emissions from building energy use (electricity and natural gas) have declined steadily since 2010 and represent one of the most significant sources of long-term reductions in the community inventory. A primary driver of these reductions has been the continued decarbonization of Burbank Water and Power’s electricity generation and procurement. Increased renewable energy generation and procurement—such as solar and wind—has lowered the carbon intensity of delivered electricity. As a result, even where electricity consumption has remained stable or grown modestly, associated emissions have declined. In contrast, natural gas use in residential and commercial buildings has increased slightly since 2022 most likely influenced by weather variability, occupancy patterns, and economic activity. Since natural gas combustion remains carbon-intensive relative to electricity, sustained reductions in gas use will be critical to achieving deeper emissions cuts. Continued electrification of buildings, including spaceATTACHMENT 1A1-11

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 12 heating, water heating, and appliances, is expected to increase electricity demand over time. However, this increase in consumption is anticipated to be balanced by ongoing efficiency improvements and a progressively cleaner electricity supply, allowing overall building-sector emissions to continue declining even as electrification accelerates. Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment Emissions from off-road vehicles and equipment increased between 2010 and 2022, reflecting growth in construction activity, landscaping, and other fuel-consuming equipment uses. Slight declines by 2024 may reflect fuel efficiency improvements or normalization of activity levels following peak construction or recovery periods. Although smaller in magnitude than the on-road transportation and building energy sectors, this sector remains a meaningful contributor due to its heavy reliance on gasoline and diesel fuel. Continued electrification of off-road vehicles and equipment will be essential to achieving further emissions reductions, particularly as zero-emission technologies become more widely available and commercially viable. Solid Waste Solid waste emissions have increased modestly over time, primarily due to increases in landfilled waste tonnage. Growth in population and commercial activity has contributed to higher overall waste generation, resulting in greater methane emissions from landfill decomposition. While diversion programs and recycling efforts reduce the volume of landfilled material, overall disposal tonnage trends indicate that landfill emissions have risen in recent years. State requirements under Senate Bill 1383 are intended to significantly increase organic waste diversion and reduce methane emissions from landfills. However, without detailed annual tracking of organic waste diversion and disposal composition, it is difficult to fully quantify the extent to which these requirements are reducing landfill-related GHG emissions in the inventory Water Emissions associated with the water sector have declined significantly over time due to decreasing reliance on imported water combined with the declining carbon intensity of electricity used to extract, convey, treat, and distribute imported water. Together, these factors have driven substantial declines in water-sector GHG emissions even as total water demand fluctuates from year to year. Wastewater Wastewater emissions have remained a small share of the total inventory. Emissions are generally driven by the City’s service population, or population plus employment, and organic loading in wastewater. Changes over time are consistent with population and employment growth.ATTACHMENT 1A1-12

City of Burbank 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Update 13 Table 4 Communitywide GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Emission Sector 1990 2010 2019 2022 2024 Total Annual GHG Emissions [MT CO2e] 1,223,465 1,439,371 1,214,228 1,092,878 1,067,347 Change since 1990 [%] - 17.65% -0.75% -10.67% -12.76% Change since 2010 [%] - - -15.64% -24.07% -25.85% Change since 2019 [%] - - - -10.0% -12.1% Change since 2022 [%] - - - - -2.34% MT = metric tons; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalents. Figure 3 Communitywide GHG Emissions (MT CO 2e) Sincerely, Rincon Consultants, Inc. Nico Kent, M.S. Erik Feldman, M.S. Project Manager Principal 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1990 2010 2019 2022 2024 Building Natural Gas Building Electricity On-road Transportation Off-road Equipment Solid Waste Wastewater/water All SectorsATTACHMENT 1A1-13

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 1 City of Burbank Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Key Highlights and Implementation Updates Table of Contents Table 1: Communitywide GHG Emissions ...............................................................1 Figure 1: Communitywide GHG Emissions (MT CO 2 e) ..............................................2 Table 2: GGRP Accomplishments from 2025-2026 ...................................................3 Table 3: GGRP Measures with Staff Updates ......................................................... 10 City emissions are the lowest they’ve been in over 30 years, but significant work remains to meet goals. The City’s communitywide GHG emissions for 2024, the most recent full calendar year of data available at the time of the analysis, were estimated at 1,067,347 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e) or about 10 MT C02e per capita, approximately 2.3 percent below the updated 2022 inventory result of 1,092,878 MT CO2e, and about 13 percent below the 1990 baseline of 1,223,465 MT CO2e. The City’s 2030 target is to reduce GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels, down to 734,000 MT CO2e total or 7 MT C02e per capita, requiring further significant reductions in the years ahead. Table 1: Communitywide GHG Emissions Inventory Year Total Emissions (MT CO2e) % Change from 1990 Baseline (2030 goal of -40% vs 1990) % Change from Prior Inventory 1990 Baseline 1,223,465 — — 2010 1,439,371 +17.7% — 2019 1,214,228 −0.8% −15.6% from 2010 2022 1,092,878 −10.7% −10.0% from 2019 2024 (this report) 1,067,347 −12.8% −2.3% from 2022ATTACHMENT 2A2-1

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 2 Note: 2010, 2019, and 2022 figures have been updated from prior inventories to reflect revised methodology, including EMFAC2025 emission factors and updated wastewater allocation. Source: Rincon Consultants, February 2026. Figure 1: Communitywide GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) To reduce emissions and improve the quality of life in Burbank, the City has completed 14 GGRP measures to date. There are 54 additional GGRP measures currently being implemented, with another 55 pending initiation. A public online dashboard called CAPDash (https://www.burbankca.gov/web/community-development/climate-action- plan) is available to view the quantitative status of Burbank’s community-wide greenhouse gas inventory and the status of the GGRP’s measures and actions. Key accomplishments from this reporting period, 2025-2026, are highlighted below with brief descriptions and photos. 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1990 2010 2019 2022 2024 Building Natural Gas Building Electricity On-road Transportation Off-road Equipment Solid Waste Wastewater/water All SectorsATTACHMENT 2A2-2

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 3 Table 2: GGRP Accomplishments from 2025-2026 GGRP Measure # Notes C-1.1.d C-1.1.f The GGRP’s Cornerstone measure is to leverage BWP’s expertise to develop an Affordable Housing Electrification Program. BWP is actively collaborating with Burbank Housing Corporation to pilot a full electrification and rooftop solar retrofit at an affordable housing building in support of the City’s GGRP cornerstone equity goals. To date, the project has been awarded $73,000 in state incentives. BE-1.2 BWP launched an enhanced building electrification rebate program in July 2025, including elevated incentives for low-income customers and affordable housing providers, and doubled the rebate cap for commercial customers installing efficiency or electrification measures from $100,000 to $200,000.ATTACHMENT 2A2-3

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 4 BE-1.3.a BWP reports annual energy savings from conservation programs. During fiscal year 24-25, savings of over 5,800 MWh were achieved, equivalent to 7,800 homes' usage for a year. EG-1.1.f BWP launched a Solar Battery Energy Storage System rebate program in February 2026, offering incentives to residents and businesses installing batteries paired with solar.ATTACHMENT 2A2-4

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 5 EG-1.1 BWP completed the largest solar and battery storage project in the City, a 2.1 MW solar and 2 MW/8 MWh battery storage project at the Hollywood/Burbank Airport’s Regional Intermodal Transit Center, known as the “RITC.”ATTACHMENT 2A2-5

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 6 CG-1.2.a BWP converted 100% of all streetlights citywide to highly efficient light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. T-3.1 BWP launched an EV Technical Assistance Program to help local businesses and municipal departments evaluate the suitability of sites for EV charger installation. Fleet Level 2 EV charging stations have been installed at the ASB and City Hall Parking LotsATTACHMENT 2A2-6

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 7 T-3.1.c A Municipal Fleet Optimization Study was completed to understand the potential to replace fossil-fuel vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. The fleet continues to add zero-emission vehicles. W-1.1.g In March 2025, Transportation staff implemented a paid parking program in Downtown Burbank in alignment with the City’s Parking Management Principles.ATTACHMENT 2A2-7

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 8 W-1.1.g All City-owned irrigation controllers have been modernized to reduce water usage. CS-1.1.b The City’s in-lieu fee program for tree removal of public trees has been implemented. CS-1.1.f Parks and Recreation, in partnership with Davey Resource Group, is developing a citywide Urban Forest Master Plan, including a completed tree inventory as of November 2024 and an urban canopy analysis prioritizing low-income and disadvantaged communities.ATTACHMENT 2A2-8

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 9 W-1.1 Enforcement of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance continues for newly permitted landscapes. T-3.1.d Evaluate alternative options to gas-powered landscape and forestry maintenance equipment when replacing city-owned equipment. BWP Hosted a Landscape Equipment Electrification Workshop and Hands- On Expo on January 17, 2026. It was attended by 42 people, including local landscapers, vendors, and residents. Parks staff have expanded the use of Stihl battery-powered equipment for light-duty tasks at City facilities. Chainsaws and backpack blowers still lack the power needed for larger park work, but new models are being evaluated as technology improves. The Department remains committed to sustainable equipment transitions where feasible.ATTACHMENT 2A2-9

City of Burbank | GGRP Implementation Highlights - 10 SW1.1.b SW-1.1.h SW 1.1.i Multiple organic waste diversion measures have been implemented in alignment with SB1383, including the adoption of an Edible Food Recovery Ordinance and an organic waste collection ordinance. Table 3: GGRP Measures with Staff Updates (on the following pages)ATTACHMENT 2A2-10

Please filter by Department Lead and enter data into orange input cells Measure Type GGRPID# Action Department Lead(s) Phasing Progress Notes Notes (2026) Adaptation and Resilience A-1.1.a Review and update the City’s Emergency Preparedness website to reflect ways to prepare for events that may be likely to increase due to climate change. Community Development/Burbank Fire Short- to Mid- term Ongoing Fire: The ReadyBurbank website has specific information related to Wildland Fire, Hot Weather, Winter Storm & Cold Weather, Heavy Rain Storm, Urban Flooding as well as Debris Flow (Mud Slide) & Mudflow. These are events that could be attributed to or potentially associated with climate change. Fire: This remain ongoing. These hazards are identified on the current stand alone Ready Burbank website and will continue on the Ready Burbank page when rolled into the new Fire Department website. Adaptation and Resilience A-1.1.b Work with Ready LA County to continue public education regarding the symptoms of extreme heat exposure in English, Spanish, and Armenian. Community Development/Burbank Fire Short- to Mid- term Pending Fire: The LA County Emergency Survival Guide (an all hazards preparedness tool that does include extreme weather incidents) is produced in multiple languages, including Spanish and Armenian. The City of Burbank Fire Department Emergency Management Division has plans to create a similar Burbank specific type of guide in the future. BPD: in conjunction with PIO distribute seasonal information Adaptation and Resilience A-1.1.c Identify low-cost mechanisms to reduce the impact of extreme heat on the community, especially on the most vulnerable members of society (i.e. children, the elderly, economically disadvantaged groups, and those with chronic health conditions made worse by heat exposure), and review grant opportunities to fund and implement. Parks Short- to Mid- term Ongoing The City is adding shade structures to our parks around picnic areas. PARKS - The City installed shade structures over picnic areas and bleachers and planted trees in parks to reduce heat impacts and provide relief for vulnerable community members. Adaptation and Resilience A-1.1.d Identify three new community locations that are either owned by the City or a trusted private entity that can serve as shelter, evacuation, and/or clean air centers for future climate emergency events in centralized areas throughout the City. Community Development Mid-term Pending Housing and Econ Dev to be tasked with this responsibility. Adaptation and Resilience A-1.2.a Work with the Burbank Fire Department to review and update the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to confirm that it aligns with the Federal requirements, including identification of hazards and a climate risk assessment. Community Development/Public Works/ Burbank Fire Short-term Ongoing Fire: The latest version of the LHMP was presented to Cal OES and FEMA for approval in late 2022, was given tentative approval in January 2023 and was adopted by Burbank City Council in March 2023. The latest version of the LHMP does address climate change hazards and the Fire Department Emergency Management Division is continuing to work with individual departments develop climate hazard related mitigation projects. Fire: The current FEMA approved, and City Council adopted, LHMP is valid through January 2028 and does contain language in accordance with the guidance