BUDGET WORKSHOP

DUNEDIN, FLORIDA MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION BUDGET WORKSHOP #2 JULY 15, 2024 PRESENT: City Commission: Also Present: CALL TO ORDER CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVE 9:00 A.M Mayor Julie Ward Bujalski , Vice Mayor Maureen "Moe " Freaney , Commissioners Jeff Gow , John Tornga , and Robert Walker City Manager Jennifer Bramley, City Clerk Senior Administrat ive Assistant Katherine Lachcik, Deputy City Manager Jorge Qu in tas , Finance Director Les Tyler , Parks & Recreation Director Vince Gizzi , Library Director Phyllis Gorshe, Fire Chief Jeff Parks , CRA/Economic Development Director Bob lronsmith , Community Development Director George Kinney , Human Resource/Risk Management Director Theresa E Smalling, Ph.D. , IT Services Director Michael Nagy , Communications Director Sue Burness , Public Works Director Sue Bartlett , Utilities Director Janice Bennett , Budget Manager Ashley Kimpton, Sanitation & Recycling Director Bill Pickrum , Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Mike Handoga , Parks & Recreat ion Administrative Superintendent Lanie Sheets , Recreation Superintendent Jocelyn Brodhead , Golf Operations General Manager Blair Kline , Strategy & Sustainab ility Manager Nicole Delfino , Sustainability Program Manager Natalie Gass , Harbormaster Laurie Ferguson , Public Works Administrative Coordinator Tanya Hart , HR & Risk Manager Alex Simpkins and approximately two people in the audience. Vice Mayor Freaney welcomed everyone to the July 15 , 2024 , City Commission Budget Wor kshop and called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. She advised that Mayor Bujalski would be ar ri ving shortly. *Mayor Bujalski arrived at 9:06 a.m. 1. BUSINESS 1.b. City Manager Opening Remarks City Manager Bramley made the following open ing remarks : The expectation today is to convey a great deal of information to the City Commission to be ready for Budget Workshop #3. No decisions were being asked for today ; she was sure there would be good discussion and consensus direction on any of the items. Fin ance Director Tyler advised regarding Budget Workshop #3 : The Board of Finance will be presenting their FY25 Budget Report to the Comm iss ion on August 6, 2024. The Aid to Organ izations will be discussed on August 6, 2024 . 1.c. Follow-up: FY 2025 Budget Workshop #1 Staff Presentation Follow Up Memo - Exhibit A has a list of 19 items. Finance Director Tyler briefly rev iewed each of the items: 24-1

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission 1. Staff is recommending the operating costs CPI increase be 2.5% in FY26 to FY30 in the General Fund , and they have made this change in the FY25 Proposed Operating and Capital Budget. 2. The replacement of 800 MHz radios new project page is attached (See Attachment A) . Since the last meet ing , the Fire Department has needs for radios as well; those estimates for the next five years have been added. The project page is now $960 ,000 over a six- year period. 3. Human Resources has compiled a list of regular position vacancies by department from FY20 through FY24 , as well as the current status of vacancies and a list of implemented recruitment and retention initiatives (See Attachment 8, C, and D). 4. Staff is working on a plan to do the Causeway restroom restorations and the roof at the same time. The restroom restoration is being done this fiscal year ; the meta l roof only needs some repair and is being done at the same time this fiscal year . Work should take about 30 days once it begins. 5. Staff is proposing that the pool classroom roof replacement be a stand-alone project and should be completed as soon as funding is available. It should not be part of the Highlander Aquatic Complex project. 6. Based on a review of the CRA budget , with over $20 ,000 ,000 in ongoing capital projects and a projected annual debt service of $1 ,200,000, the CRA Fund does not have the ability to fund the ongoing Downtown Looper service. 7. Staff agrees that the Jolly Trolley project expense will extend out past FY25 ; the project request has been updated to show estimated cost increases in years 2026 through 2030 (See Attachment E). In addition, the Commun ity Development Department has reached out to the Jolly Trolley to acquire some initial cost estimates for increased service to every 30 minutes and has a meeting scheduled with Forward Pinellas for further guidance/suggestions. Mayor Bujalski suggested Economic DevelopmenUCRA Director lronsmith should also talk with the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA). She has spoken with them inquiring about a New Service Grant , and it would be the goal to pursue a portion of funding from PSTA. 8. Staff has increased the FY25 Budget for the Bike Pedestrian Plan project to $75,000. Staff has applied for a grant up to $75 ,000 to cover the cost (See Attachment F). 9. The addition "Pilot" to the title of the Resiliency and Sustainability Rebate Program has been done. Regarding reducing permit costs, staff would recommend retaining the permit fee rebate; the City Attorney will be asked to opine if the program can be retroactive , but staff thinks retroactive asks would be limited to the current fiscal year. Solar is encouraged at all levels through the DRC , information sharing , the City webs ite , and newsletter ; the sustainability matr ix is being reviewed and recommendations are being made that would provide a higher point value on solar and other costlier items which ultimately encourages the use of solar. No adjustments have been made to the budget at this point. 10 . The Spectrum PEG government access channel, which currently has a monthly fee of $1 ,500 , is still being set up in the City broadcast control room . Spectrum is working with the IT Services department on installation of the equipment and cable. 24-2

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission IT Services Director Nagy advised the Spectrum equipment is installed and they are running tests on the channel , and they will be getting back to the City hopefully this week and be ready to go live shortly. Communications Director Burness advised there will be a big announcement when they are ready to go live . 11. Regarding adding a project for the Beltrees Street Implementation Project , staff is currently evaluating the plan recommendations and will present a priority implementation plan to the City Manager once completed. It is likely that a specific project will not be ready for FY25, but staff will look to consider one for FY26. 12. Regarding an assessment for the Lobbyist services performed to date , The Southern Group (TSG) worked with City staff in submitting and completing appropriations requests, notifying staff of pending bills being heard in committee , and providing legislative bill updates throughout the session. TSG coordinated meetings with Legislative delegation for staff to meet with while in Tallahassee , attended and spoke at committee meetings on behalf of the City , and advocated for bill language amendments with legislators for issues impacting Dunedin . While appropriations requests were not successful this year, the value provided by TSG in advocating for the City , having a direct touch point to legislators , providing consistent and timely updates as to bill actions , and coordinating meetings with legislators and state department agencies has been immeasurably valuable. As we look into the next legislative session , staff will work closely with TSG and legislators to identify the projects likely to be most successful for appropriations requests and coordinate more direct contact meetings with staff and legislators as well as bill tracking , committee meeting attendance , and timely notifications. 13. Regarding the viability of having hanging flower baskets in downtown Dunedin , the required non-refundable application costs for Duke to perform a structural assessment to consider installation of hanging flower baskets on their leased poles was cost-prohibitive and likely not to have been approved due to structural, wind load, and safety concerns . Mayor Bujalski emphasized the need for color in the landscaping. 14. Staff is working with Forward Pinellas to develop a conceptual plan for the safety of walkers and bikers for the Pinellas Trail safety improvements along Dunedin 's busy section from Scotland Street to Skinner Boulevard to separate walkers from bikers . Staff plans to set a meeting with Pinellas County to discuss the results of this plan. 15. Regarding the Downtown Lighting Plan , staff has lighting concepts completed. No concept or design has been selected and no funds have been budgeted for installation . A request was made fo r this item to be on a workshop agenda . 16 . With regards to the acoustics in Edinburgh Hall at the Community Center , there is no budget for acoustics in FY25. Staff will look into better acoustics in the hall. 17. Staff added the Logistic Storage Building project for the Fire Department in the General Fund in FY28 at a cost of $225 ,000. The Fire Chief has requested the project be added back and advised the logistics building will still be required at some point in the future (See Attachment G). 18 . Staff has provided the attached information with a detailed list of the requested items on the CIP request - Equipment Standardization & Modernization (Apparatus & PPE ) (See Attachment H). 24-3

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission 19 . Regarding the Weybridge Woods Bridge Evaluation/Study , City staff has received the scope and fee for the inspections and replacement recommendations from the consultant. Engineering and Public Works staff reviewed the submitted information. Staff sent the City 's comments back to the consultant on July 2, 2024 , and will likely have the consultant under contract by the end of the month. The consultant will produce a report no later than 45 days after their inspection. 1.d. Revenue, Expenditures and Projections - All Funds Staff Presentation Finance Director Tyler referred to the PowerPoint presentation (Exhibit D of Agenda Item 1.a.) ; the following are highlights and comments . Base Line Information Ad Valorem Revenue as of May 29, 2024, Pinellas County Estimate The Proposed Budget was published on June 30, 2024; the Final Certification came on July 1, 2024, for this year. Total Taxable Property Value Increase over Prior Year: City of Dunedin: 10.20% The final County number was 10.21 % the 0.2 to 0.21 is about $$1,400 in 2025, a small adjustment moving forward . Dunedin TIF District (CRA): 10.95% The July 1st amount was slightly different at 10.97%. Pinellas County : 10.96% The FY25 Proposed Budget is based on a 4.1345 millage rate. The City has held the millage rate the same since FY16. The 4.1345 millage rate was presented to the Commission and approved at the July 11, 2024, City Commission Meeting for the Proposed Millage Rate. Millage Rate Effect on Ad Valorem Tax Revenue (Page 8 - Graph) 2014 - 2025 Millage Rate Property Tax Revenue is shown with steady ad valorem revenue growth for a number of years. The Proposed Budget was published on June 30, 2024; the Final Certification came on July 1, 2024 , for this year. FY25 Revenues Comparison of FY25 to FY24 Budget General Fund - Other Taxes +11.14% ($609 ,000 increase) Electrical Services , Community Services (Cable & Satellite, Video Streaming, and Telephone Service) Electrical Services Tax was the main increase in 2025 compared to the 2024 budget. The FY24 Budget was much lower than the actual Revenues in FY23 , which is the reason for the upward adjustment in FY25 for that particular revenue source. Commissioner Tornga shared some information regarding possible changes coming at Duke Energy that could change the projection. Penny Fund - Other Taxes - 2.6% The Actual Estimated Revenue in current FY24 are $5.4 Million , which is 3.5% less than the FY25 budgeted amount. 24-4

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission The projection is a 1% increase in the FY25 budget compared to the FY24 estimate , which indicates very minimal growth projected for next year. There will be more discussion on the Penny Fund later in the presentation. The FY24 Actual Revenues are trending slightly under budget. The FY25 Budget is consistent with the most recent Pinellas County estimates . The County estimates for future years have not been seen yet , which should be in a week or two based on prior years; this is consistent with last year at this time. County Gas Tax- Other Taxes -1.9% Enterprise Fund Utility Rate Increases: Solid Waste +4 % Water/Wastewater +6% Stormwater +24 .7% FY25 Expenditures (Pages 10 - 13 Details of various funds) The FY25 budget includes the following estimates : Salary and Wages 3.5% merit increase for all eligible staff as well as an increase for the estimated financial impact of the Fire Union negotiations, which are expected to be completed by August 2024. No changes to range minimums and maximums. In reference to Page 14 of the Budget Book , Mr. Tyler explained the Citywide Wages - All Funds is an 8% increase. That is a combination of the 3.5% Merit and the placeholder for the Fire negotiations in 2025. Also, on the Expense side in the proposed budget , there are six new Firefighter positions; that salary increase and the offsetting revenue for the grant is assuming they are being paid for the next three years per the grant. The total impact of all that is an 8% increase in Wages in 2025. There are nine other position requests not in the budget that will be presented later. Human Resources/Risk Management Director Smalling provided information regarding the position vacancies , noting that while it can look like it is not moving , there are people retiring or leaving for various reasons while positions are being filled at the same time . She does think there has been an impact with the Classification and Compensation Study. Benefits • 7.2% increase in health costs over FY24 budget. Staff is still evaluating health costs and working with the HR/Risk Director. Operating In general, costs of controllable operating expenditures* are assumed at a 3% increase in all funds except: *Controllable operating expenditures exclude /SF charges and utility charges. Finance Director Tyler reviewed the reasons for the departments that went over the 3% assumption as detailed in the PowerPoint Pages 11 -13: Public Art Fund : +20% or $5 ,000 Building Fund: +5 .7% or $11,443 24-5

Budget Workshop minutes July 15 , 2024 Solid Waste : +5.4 % or $181 ,865 Water/Wastewater : +18 .6% or $1 ,053 ,584, Marina : +11.5% or $13 ,850 Stormwater: +108.5 % or $1,461,850 Dunedin City Commission Significant discussion ensued regarding the Gabion R&R; it was advised that the budgeted projects are part of the Stormwater Master Plan. It was noted that an application has been made for a grant as well as the ten-year rate study for an increase over a three-year period to be revisited in the 4th year for any appropr iate adjustments . ► Request for the after-action report of this meeting regarding information on the last Stormwater Master Plan , i.e . recommended dollars to spend in that report and what was actually achieved , a list of the projects , and the amounts . Mayor Bujalski noted there were multiple millions of dollars spent in repairs as part of that plan. Golf Operations Fund : +46.3% or $440 ,546 , Fleet: +8% or $107 ,593 Facilities: +17% or $207 ,038 Discussion ensued regarding the Custodial Services, including a future study regarding contract/in-house . Risk : +26.6% Health : +8 .5% IT Services: +16.7 % or $202,979 Long Range Fund Projections • Gene ral Fund Finance Director Tyler advised: Since Budget Workshop #1 , there were adjustments and fine-tuning of the FY25 Budget. The Proposed General Fund Budget is balanced with the FY25 Available Funds Reserve Balance at 22 .8% , well above the target of 15%. In 2027 and future years , there is a projected budget shortfall that will be reviewed at $2.3 Mill ion in the General Fund. The shortfall was $1.2 Million when the Draft Business Plan was presented on June 25, 2024. This shortfall represents the excess of Expenditures over Revenue over the 5-year time frame in the General Fund , which would be addressed in detail. Revenue & Expenditure Highlights (image below) 24-6

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change ¾ Change Reven.e Higlights Property Taxes $ 15 ,607 ,45 1 $ 17,1 43 ,54 1 $ 1,536 ,090 9.8% ntergoverrmental $ 5,617 ,100 $ 6,160 ,880 $ 543 ,780 9.7% Charges fo r Se Mces $ 7,906 ,539 $ 9,117 ,376 $ 1,210 ,837 15.3% Expeooibses Higl1igtis Personnel $ 19 ,878 ,853 $ 21 ,830 ,222 $ 1,951 ,369 9.8% Cap ital $ 1,312,900 $ 3,580 ,717 $ 2,267 ,817 17 2.7% Othe r $ 382 ,500 $ 562 ,500 $ 180 ,000 47 .1% Revenue : The Intergovernmental change is due mainly to the SAFER Federal Grant of $466 ,000 for the cost of six Firefighters in the FY25 budget that was not in the FY24 budget ; if approved , it will cover all the labor costs for the positions for FY25 , FY26 , and FY27 . Charges for Services increased by $1.2 Million or 15% , due mainly to an increase reimbursement from the County for $439 ,000 for the County Firefighters and EMS costs in FY25 compared to FY2024. Also , Parks & Recreation increased Revenue of $275 ,000 in FY25 compared to FY24. There was also an Administrative Fee revenue increase from the Golf Enterprise Fund , which is paying its Administrative Fee like other Enterprise Funds ; that amount was approximately $275 ,000 to increase that item over FY24 . Expenditures : Personnel- Increase of $1 .9 Million year over year due to the Merit Increase as mentioned ; there was a set aside for the labor costs and financial impact associated with the negotiations currently underway with the Dunedin Firefighters Association. There is also a set aside for allocated labor costs from the Engineering Department for General Fund projects; the estimate will be evaluated during the year with actual time spent on General Fund Projects and will be adjusted if necessary. The budget currently assumes that 35% of Engineering with most of Engineering staff will work on General Fund-related projects , Parks & Recreation , Fire, or others. That will be monitored monthly and reviewed every six months and true it up if the time spent is different than projected. Health Insurance costs as mentioned have 8% increase , which is approximately $260 ,000. The six Firefighter positions through the SAFER Grant are in the Proposed Budget; no other posit ions are added to the FY25 Budget at this time. Those are still being evaluated by the City Manager. ► Request for the impact on overtime in the Fire Department or other costs . Capital- Increase of $2.2 Million in FY25 over FY24 due mainly to the purchase of Fire Engine 103 ; replacement in FY25 of $900 ,000 to be lease-financed over a seven-year time frame . Also , Highlander Tennis Courts Refurbishment in FY25 has an increase project of $550 ,000 compared to FY24 ; there was $200,000 that was offset against that due to removing a $200 ,000 carry-over for court resurfacing, but the increase of that project was $500 ,000. 24-7

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission Also, there is a Solar Energy Improvement Project in FY25 with a set aside of $750,000 ; the estimated cost to provide solar on one City building is to be dete rmined , possibly at the Library . Other costs - Increase of $180 ,000 in FY25 due to an increase in Aid to Organizations of $40 ,000 in the City Commission Budget. Increase of $50 ,000 for the addition of the Dunedin Resiliency & Sustainability Rebate Program . Increase of $30 ,000 to the Clearwater Ferry Service in FY25 . General Fund Assumpt ions - Revenue Property Tax Values: FY25 : +10.2% & $46 .8M new construct ion One large property annexation was $11 Million ► Request for a high-level breakdown of the $46.8 Million new construction FY26 : +4.3% & $SM new construction FY27 : +3.9% & $SM new construction FY28 : +3.4% & $SM new construction FY29 : +3.1 % & $SM new construction FY30 : +3.0% & $SM new construction This is consistent with the County estimate last year , and once the County 's information is received , it will be compared . These are relatively conservative estimates . The new construction is also very conservative intentionally in FY26 - FY30 . Other Tax Revenue: FY26-30 +2% Intergovernmental Revenue : FY26-30 : +2% Charges for Service : FY26-30 : +2.2% General Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries: FY26-30: +3.5% Benefits : FY26-30 : +6 .0% Operating : FY26-30: +2 .5% Non-CIP Capital: FY26-30 : +1.0% General Fund Long Range Plan (Detail Page 18) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book: Pages 84-89 Finance Director Tyler explained : The FY25 Proposed Budget is balanced with the Available Reserve Amount at the end of FY25 projected at 22.8% , well above the 15% target. The General Long Range Plan presents the budget shortfall not being addressed first and then it gives it being addressed. The red font numbers - Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures in FY25 - FY30 is showing that the Revenues are less than Expenditures by that amount for that part icular year. 24-8

Budget Workshop minutes July 15 , 2024 Dunedin City Commission The first yellow highlighted row represents the Estimated Available Fund Balance at the end of each year. In 2026 , it is still over 15% at 15 .9% , then lower in 2027 - 2030 ; the Expenses are more than Revenues and it trends down from there . The bottom yellow highlighted row is the same information with the budget shortfall be ing addressed. The estimated average shortfall over that five-year timeframe from 2026 - 2030 is $2 .37 Million. The shortfall can be addressed with reduction in Expenses or service levels , increases in Revenue , or a combination of both . This budget is for FY25 , which is the focus ; it is balanced largely due to the large carry-over. In FY24 , there is a carry-over estimate of 31 % Reserve , which flows into FY25 and helps balance FY25. The estimated shortfall will need to be addressed in each budget cycle moving forward. FY26 is in fairly good shape right now with the over 15% . For the short fall , in FY25 there is very little change in FY25 right now ; there is a little increase in Assessed Value in 2025 for outstanding expenditures ; the 22 .8% is slightly better than the Business Plan for 2025. That is good news , and the net impact is minimal compared to when discussed in Budget Workshop #1. In the outer years , some items were adjusted and Mr. Tyler explained how the shortfa ll has increased somewhat: Assessed Value increased in FY2025 of about $500,000, which generated about $3 Million of Revenue in the Long Range Plan ; that is offset by about $7 Million in Expense increase since the Business Plan due to: Operations: Increase in the Operation Assumption from 2% to 2.5% , which is not significant on an annual basis ; however , over the five years , it is about a $1.2 Million increase . In the Business Plan , the Sheriff's Contract was not available ; it went up 7% or $271 ,000 in FY25 versus FY24. That has been added to the Operating Costs that was not in the Business Plan. There is about a $2.2 Million impact over the 6-year time frame. Personnel : The Firefighters have been added ; they are fully funded for the first three years , and then for 2027 - 2030 it is the responsibility of the City. The assumption is that all six Firefighters continue through 2030 , even though there is no legal requ irement for them to continue , and that cost average is about $700 ,000 a year for 3 years , so there is about a $2.1 Million increase over that three-year per iod in the outer years . Expense: The Fire negotiations estimate for the Business Plan was rough and a placeholder was put in , which is refined in the proposed budget with better information ; the increase compared to what was in the placeholder in the Bus iness Plan versus in the Proposed Budget regarding the cost over the five-year time frame is about $1 .1 Million more. The shortfall will be a $1 Million more per year now than it was in the Bus iness Plan . The Marina Master Plan costs estimates for the Marina Fund were recently received ; it is not in the proposed budget. The estimated General Fund Impact in that study for FY25 with what is being seen now would be potentially adding to the budget $190 ,000 for Harbormaster repairs and fishing pier/day dock repairs , including Design costs of both projects ; those 24-9

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission would be paid by the General Fund. There will be construction costs for both those projects totaling about $1.7 Million , potentially funded by the General Fund; those costs are not in 2026 or 2027 . His understanding is the Marina Master Plan will be presented to the Commission in August and Finance staff will work with the City Manager and the Commission moving forward to make adjustments to the budget as they work through that plan. Questions for Staff - None ► Mayor Bujalski requested a spreadsheet or report showing what was planned for the Reserves and the percentage of Operations and what actually happened in the last five years . She explained her rationale is because every year the shortfall is shown but it never happens , and it is giving a perception to the public that the City is either overspending or not budgeting correctly . The shortfall never comes to fruition. Significant discussion ensued with the Commissioners in agreement fo r the review as requested. Finance Director Tyler commented on most cities not going to the out years so far, noting the focus is on FY25 , and going out this far does make those conversations come up more ; he agreed it would be good to look at. BREAK 10:25 A.M. -10:43 A.M. • Stadium Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed Rewrue Hig~ igtis Misce llaneous I$ 1,654 ,9oo I$ 1,s23 ,ooo I$ Expenditures Hig~ igtis Operating! $ sss .soo I$ 1,02s ,1so I$ Revenue: $ Change % Change (31 ,900 )1 -1 .9% 1s9 ,9so I 19 .9% Reduction in the expected reimbursement from the Blue Jays based on the past couple of years. Property Taxes were less than budgeted the last couple of years and their reimbursement was less . Expenditure: Increase in Operating of $170,000 due to the estimated potential increase in property insurance in FY25 ; staff is still working through those numbers . Property and Liability are still being fine-tuned , which could change the allocation for the Stad ium Fund and other funds. Stadium Fund Assumptions - Revenue Transfers In : FY25: $350,000 from General Fund for Operations FY26-30: $450 ,000 per year from General Fund for operations Stadium Fund Assumptions - Expenditure Operating: FY26-30 : +3.0% Stadium Fund Overview (Page 21) 24-10

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 FY25 Proposed Budget Book Pages 90-91 Dunedin City Commission The FY25 Budget includes normal operating costs for the Stadium Fund . The Reserve for Capital in FY25 is shown , as well as the estimates for each year ; that is the estimate set aside each year for Nam ing Rights and Ticket Revenue for Stadium and the Players Development Complex . Questions for Staff Mayor Bujalski inquired about the issue with the water; City Manager Bramley explained it is not reflected in this budget; however , staff is working out the solutions with the City's partners . • Impact Fee Fund Impact Fee Funds Combined Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change Reverue Highlights Licenses , Perm its , Fees $ 155 ,500 $ 105 ,500 $ (50 ,000) Miscellaneous $ 6,000 $ 22 ,000 $ 16 ,000 Expenditu'es Highlights Capita l $ 240 ,000 $ 240 ,000 $ - Revenue: Decrease in Licenses , Permits Revenue of $50 ,000 due to the estimated reduction in Parkland Impact Fees in FY25 . An increase in Miscellaneous Revenue of $16 ,000 projected increase in Interest Earnings in FY25. Impact Fee Fund Assumptions - Revenue License, Permits , Fees : Reflects estimates for known development projects . Transfers In: From CRA for Parkland Impact Fee contribut ions Impact Fee Funds Combined Overview (Detail - Page 24) FY25 Proposed Budget Book Pages 92-93 This includes the Multimodal , Parkland , Fire and Law Enforcement. Multimodal Impact Fee Fund Overview (Detail - Page 25) Revenue Estimate is based on projected development. The FY25 Budget has the Safety Crossing Improvements at various locations for $60 ,000 , the same amount as FY24. Parkland Impact Fee Fund Overview (Detail - Page 26) FY25 Budget includes $180 ,000 for the Gladys Douglas Preserve Project Improvements . No projected Expenses are in FY26 and after at this time , and there are no known projects in future years at this time. The Fund Balance is projected to be $496 ,000 at the end of FY25. Fire Impact Fee Fund Overview (Detail - Page 27) 24-11 -321% 266 .7% 0.0%

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission No projected Expenses in FY25 or future years at this time ; it has approximately $106 ,000 in the Estimated Fund Balance. Law Enforcement Impact Fee Fund Overview (Detail - Page 28) No projected Expenses planned for FY25 or future years at this time; it has approximately $76 ,000 Estimated Fund Balance at the end of FY25. Questions for Staff In response to the question from Vice Mayor Freaney, Mr. Tyler advised this fee has to be used for Capital that relates to the Sheriffs contract. • Public Art Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change Rewnue Higtigtis Licenses , Permits , Fees $ 5,000 $ 2,500 $ (2 ,500) -50 .0% Transfers n $ 45 ,000 $ 45 ,000 $ - 0.0% Expenditlres Highligtis Operating $ 25 ,000 $ 30 ,000 $ 5,000 20.0% Revenue: Decrease Licenses , Permits, Fees of $2,500 estimates in FY25 subject to completion of development projects . Actual Revenue in this fund has been coming in under budget ; in FY24, the Revenue through June 30, 2024, the first nine months is $0. Similar to last year , there have not been many projects paying into this fund. Expenditure: Operating increase of $5 ,000 in FY25 compared to FY24 for the increase in the Public Art Master Plan Implementation Project. Mr. Tyler noted this fund has struggled some as has been discussed. The projection is a slightly negative Fund Balance in FY24 going into FY25 ; however in the FY25 budget is a proposed Transfer of $45 ,000 from the General Fund, the same as last year to give seed money for this fund for FY24 and FY25 . Public Art Fund Assumptions - Revenue License, Permits, Fees : Reflects estimates for known development projects. Transfers In: FY25: $45,000 from General Fund. Public Art Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Transfers Out: FY25-26: To repay FY23 Building Fund interfund loan $8,600 per year. Public Art Fund Overview (Detail - Page 31) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 94-95 24-12

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission Staff expects development projects electing to deposit the 0.5% of total project costs into the Public Art Fund will improve over time and allow for starting to generate Revenue in the near future. There are no expenditures beyond FY25 currently in this budget. Questions for Staff In response to the question from Commissioner Tornga , Mr. Tyler advised the License , Pe rmits , Fees were reduced for FY25 but not FY26 out ; that might be reduced to be cons istent. ► Request for an update on what has been done and moving forward. • Building Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change Reveooe Higtwgtis Li censes , Permits , Fees $ 1,000 ,000 $ 1,000 ,000 $ - 0.0% Miscelaneous $ 39 ,500 $ 74 ,500 $ 35 ,000 88 .6% Expendittres lig t. ghts Opera ti ng $ 450 ,910 $ 488 ,782 $ 37 ,872 8.4% Other $ - $ 50 ,000 $ 50 ,000 NIA Revenue : The Miscellaneous increase is due to an estimated increase in Interest Earnings in FY24 over FY25. Expenditure: The Operating estimated cost increase in FY25 over FY24 is due mainly to the IT Services allocation of $26 ,000 increase in FY25 over FY24 . The Other increase is due to the Incent ive Tools for the Dunedin Resiliency & Susta inab ility Pilot Rebate Program. Building Fund Assumptions - Revenue: License, Permits , Fees : FY26-30: +3% Miscellaneous: FY26-30: +1 % Transfers In: FY25-26: Payment from Public Art Fund for interfund loan $8 ,600 per year . Building Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries: FY26-30 : +3.5% Benefits: FY26-30: +6% Operating : FY26-30 : +2% Building Fund Overview (Detail - Page 34) 24-13

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book (Pages 96-97) Dunedin City Commission The Available Fund Balance is projected to be approximately $2 Million at the end of FY25. There was a reduction in Fees in FY2021 with Ordinance 21-12 ; that took place in March 2021 with the goal of following State Code Section 553.80, which allows for no more fund balance carry forward than the average of its operating budget for the past four previous fiscal years. Staff is working toward this goal and monitoring the fund. Over time, the goal is to bring the Fund Balance to about $1.4 Million; it is projected to be at $2 Million at the end of FY25. Staff is projecting the 2027 timeframe at this time; assuming the assumptions are reasonable in Revenue , it will get to the $1.4 Million Fund Balance and be within that. For the past couple of years , revenues have come in more than budget , which is a good thing ; however , it is challenging in getting it down to the 4-year average. Questions for Staff ► Inquiry as to the rationale for the State Code regarding Fund Balance. Community Development Director Kinney provided information on the progress of online permitting. Discussion ensued regarding feedback/survey of users of the online permitting program. • County Gas Tax Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change ReverxJe Higlights Othe r Taxes $ 486 ,000 $ 477 ,000 $ (9 ,000 ) -1.9% Expendill.res Highliglts OperatirYJ $ 361 ,000 $ 330 ,000 $ (31,000) ~ .6% Cap ital $ 290 ,000 $ 270 ,000 $ (20,000) -6 .9% Revenue: Gas Tax Revenues for the first nine months of FY24 are coming in slightly under budget; the FY25 budget is assuming no growth and relatively flat. The outer years are consistent with the County last year; staff is waiting for the updates. Expenditure : The decrease in Operating costs in FY25 is due mainly to a decrease in the Payment Management PCI Assessment Model Project budgeted in FY24 at $125,000 ; that is at $0 in FY25. This is offset by an increase in FY25 of $25,000 for Sidewalk Inspections and $40,000 for Cell Service Monitoring for School Flashing Lights. Decrease in Capital costs of $20,000 in FY25 compared to FY24 for the decrease in Payment Management costs in this fund. County Gas Tax Fund Assumptions - Revenue Other Revenue: FY25 : -1 .9% FY26 : +0 .5% FY27: +0.4% FY28: +0.2% 24-14

Budget Workshop minutes July 15 , 2024 FY29: +0.2% FY30 : +0.2% Miscellaneous: FY26-30: +1 % County Gas Tax Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Operating : FY26-30: +3% County Gas Tax Fund Overview (Detail - Page 37) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 98-99 Dunedin City Commission Available Fund Balance at the end of FY25 is projected at $98 ,000; 29 .7% of the 15% target. Questions for Staff In response to the question from Commissioner Tornga, Mr . Tyler advised this fund is allocated for partial costs of Payment Management Program , Penny Fund , and Stormwater. Sidewalks are a major expense in this fund. • Penny Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change Rewrue Highligtis Other Taxes $ 5,617,300 $ 5,470 ,000 $ (14 7,300 ) -2 .6% Misce llaneo us $ 423 ,000 $ 600 ,000 $ 177 ,000 41 .8% Deb t Proceeds $ 6,577 ,000 $ 4,560 ,000 $ (2,017,000 ) -30 .7% Expeooitues Highligtis Cap ital $ 14,267 ,538 $ 3,363 ,823 $ (10 ,903 ,715 ) Revenue: Other Taxes are the Penny, the actual Sales Tax line item; the FY24 Actual Revenue is projected to be less than the FY24 Budget right now. The Actual Revenues are projected to be about $5.4 Million right now in this year , which is about 3.6% less than the FY24 Budget. The FY25 Budget is based on taking the FY24 Actual Estimate and adding 1% to get to the FY25 Budget , which is $5,470 ,000 , a conservative growth. The Miscellaneous increase is due primarily to an increase of $250 ,000 in FY25 for the donation for the Highlander Aquatic Complex Therapy Pool. There is a decrease of $73 ,000 in Interest Earnings in FY25 due to the estimated reduction in the Penny Cash Fund Ba lance. Debt Proceeds have been reduced by $2 Million in the proposed budget due to moving $2.5 Million of the Garage Construction Costs to the CRA Fund from the Penny. There is still the $1.2 Million of Design for the Garage in the Penny Fund. Expenditure: -76 .4% The Capital program is decreased mainly due to the Highlander Aquatic Complex budgeted at $6.8 Million in FY24 , and the Skinner Blvd Project was budgeted at $2.9 Million in FY24. In FY25 , the Skinner Blvd Project is $0 and the Highlander Aquatic Complex is $0 in FY25 because the Highlander Aquatic Project was moved to FY26 (the estimated time of construction) . 24-15

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Penny Fund Assumptions - Revenue Penny Tax Revenue: FY25: -2.6% FY26 : +2.8% FY27 : +2.9% FY28 : +3.0% FY29 : +3.0% FY30 : +1.5% The future years are last year County projections. Misc. Revenue: Highlander Aquatic Complex Donation ($1 M total) FY24 $250k FY25 $500k FY26 $250k Transfers In: Dunedin City Commission FY25-30 from Water/WW for share of New City Hall debt service payments $468,600 per yea r. Penny Fund Overview (Detail - Page 40) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 100-103 Available Fund Balance has a balance at the end of FY30 of $1.6 Million; the end of the Penny time frame is December 2029 . The Penny Fund prov ides funding of $1.2 Million for the Mid-town Parking Garage in FY24 , and the CRA Fund will pay for the remainder. The Parking Garage budget is now $10 Million , an increase from last year's budget and the Business Plan. It was $8.8 Million. The Highlander Aquatic Complex is budgeted in the Penny Fund at $10.4 Million in FY26; this is the budgeted cost of the construction of the project estimated without the lazy river and the slides . There will be a bid alternate for the slides as previously discussed . The total budget is $11.7 Million Design and Construction ($1 .3 paid by ARPA and $10.4 by Penny) . There is an increase in the FY25 Budget compared to prior years for Pavement Management Costs , which is $1 ,030 ,000 in the FY25 proposed budget and all future years , that is $300,000 more than last year for every year. That is over $2 Million over the long-range plan ; it is part of the reason for the Ending Fund Balance for FY30 at $1 .6 Million , which was about $3 Million last year . This was proposed by staff due to the increased cost for Pavement Management over the past couple of years. Questions for Staff In response to questions from Commissioner Gow regarding the pool and concerns in the confidence in the ex isting pool lasting to 2026 , Parks & Recreation Director Gizzi advised they are constantly making repairs to the pool that is in rough shape and getting worse ; there was just a major break . Mayor Bujalski noted part of the reason for delay is due to time involved for Requests for Proposal. Mr. Gizzi noted it was a 30-month project from start of Design . Discussion ensued regarding the future Penny-for-Pinellas vote and some history of the Penny Fund in the City . 24-16

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 ARPA Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights (image below) : FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed Reveooe Higt-.ights Miscellaneous $ 350 ,0 00 $ 75 ,000 Experxfitlles Higtlgtis Operating $ 125,000 $ - Capital $ 5,404 ,660 $ 298 ,237 Revenue: Dunedin City Commission $ Change % Change $ (275 ,000) -78.6% $ (125 ,000) -100 .0% $ (5,106,423) -94.5% There was a Miscellaneous decrease due to the budget for Interest Earnings being reduced in FY25 ; this is due to the fact that the cash balance is expected to decrease as ARPA dollars are spent on projects. Expenditure : The Operating decrease is due to the $125,000 budgeted in FY24 for the Downtown Looper Service Project and not budgeted in FY24 in the ARPA Fund. The Looper Service is budgeted in the General Fund in FY25 and future years. The Capital decrease is due mainly to the fact that the Highlander Aquatic Complex Project , Skinner Blvd Project , and the Pickleball Projects were all budgeted in FY24 for a total cost of $5 .1 Million; these projects have $0 budgeted in FY25 in ARPA (A detailed list of projects is on Pages 104-105 of the Budget Document) . ARPA Fund Assumptions - Revenue • Intergovernmental : The estimated federal grant revenue under the American Plan Act for the City of Dunedin is approximately $18.3 million in total. $3,020 ,000 of the $18.3 million has been accounted for in the General Fund for revenue recovery for governmental services. $3,040,025 of the $18.3 million has been accounted for in the Golf Operations Enterprise Fund for the ARPA funds allocated to the Golf Course Restoration Project. ARPA Fund Overview (Detail - Page 42) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 104-105 The estimated ARPA Fund Balance at the end of FY25 is approximately $201 ,000 ; that is Unobligated to be determined, which could be contingent on current projects or future projects. That is interest earnings projected over the next year or so. The FY25 Ending Available Fund Balance budgeted in FY24 and FY25 is $350 ,000 , as well as $75,000 for Interest Earnings in the ARPA Fund that can by used as contingency as mentioned. Questions for Staff Mr. Tyler explained the Interest Earnings and the $201,000 is part of that ; there is no timeline to spend that money and it can be spent at the discretion of the City Comm ission. That is because it is interest. • CRA Fund 24-17

Budget Workshop minutes July 15 , 2024 Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted Rewrue Hig ~i ghts Pro perty Taxes $ 2,034 ,281 Deb t Proceeds $ 3,780 ,000 Expend itlles Higt'iigtis Cap ital $ 4,001 ,941 Debt Service $ 886 ,212 Revenue : Dunedin City Commission FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change $ 2,292 ,364 $ 258 ,083 12.7% $ 8,860 ,000 $ 5,080 ,000 134 .4% $ 9,600 ,000 $ 5,598 ,059 139 .9% $ 637 ,4 00 $ (248 ,812 ) -28 .1% For Debt Proceeds increase , the FY24 Budget had $3.8 Million for the Skinner Blvd Project ; the FY24 Budget also included $5.1 Million for the Mid-town Parking Garage. The FY25 Budget includes $8.6 Million , which is almost the same number except it is all on the Garage instead of two projects . Expenditure : The Capital cost increase is due mainly to an increase in the Mid-town Parking Garage Project in FY25 of $8 .8 Million and a reduction in Skinner Improvements budgeted at $2.7 Million that was in last year. Also , there was a reduction in the existing City Hall Adaptive Reuse Project of $302 ,000 that was in FY24 and not in FY25. The Debt Service cost decrease is due mainly to projections in FY25 budget , and timing is issu ing financing this year compared to last year. The Debt Service is slightly more in the outer years . CRA Fund Assumptions - Revenue Property Tax Values : FY25: +10.95% & $8 .9M new construction FY26 *: +4.3% FY27: +3.9% & $25M new construction FY28 : +3.4% & $25M new construction FY29 : +3.1% FY30: +3.0% *Starting in FY 2026 , the County will base its contribution off the City's millage rate of 4.1345. The County 's rate is 4.8111 in FY 2024 - FY 2025. Discussion ensued regarding the County 's proposed millage roll-back rate. The effect on the City will be to revise the CRA Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for FY25, and in future years they will be using the City 's millage rate anyway. It will reduce the CRA revenue a little. CRA Director lronsmith provided information regarding the TIF funding for the CRA sunsetting in 2033 and work being done to ensure projects are complete in the long-range plan. CRA Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries: FY26-30 : +3.5% Benefits : FY26-30 : +6% Operating: 24-18

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission FY26-30 : +2% Transfers Out: To Impact Fund for Parkland Impact Fee contributions To General Fund for P&R contributions CRA Fund Overview (Detail - Page 47) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 106-109 Under Revenues in FY25, the $8.8 Million proceeds are shown for the Mid-town Parking Garage to fully fund the estimated cost of that project and provide cash flow for the project. The CRA Fund is projected to have $235 ,000 of Available Fund Balance FY25 ; in the outer years to 2030 , there is about $1 .1 Million of Unobligated Funds. The Property Tax in FY26 was revised to the County TIF from FY26 - FY30. Mr. Tyler noted the Debt Service , as discussed last year , is a twenty-year loan ; abou t nin e years in this projection is the CRA Fund paid out to 2033, and then the last eleven years now would have the General Fund paying off that loan . The estimate is the General Fund will receive the City 's portion of the TIF at about $1.4 Million in 2033 that will transfer to the General Fund in 2033 once the CRA sunsets. That will be $1.4 Million to apply to that debt service over that 10-to-11-year timeframe. The Debt Service is estimated at $680 ,000 a year. Questions for Staff In response to the question of how much of the CRA Fund goes into maintenance of ex isting facilities , Mr. lronsmith advised the upcoming year has about $35 ,000 used to paint street lights , mast arms , and so forth. There are some major streetscapes planned, wh ich get expensive ; they are planning for that and meeting with Finance Director Tyler for the long- range funding plan. • Solid Waste Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change Reverue Highlights Charges for Se rvi ces $ 6,785 ,929 $ 7,066 ,640 $ 280 ,711 Misce llaneous $ 22 ,570 $ 56 ,455 $ 33 ,885 Expendill.res Hig~ights Personnel $ 1,824 ,094 $ 1,969 ,900 $ 145,806 Opera ting $ 5).77 ,541 $ 5,593 ,756 $ 316 ,215 Cap ita l $ 1,069 ,000 $ 1,257 ,900 $ 188 ,900 Debt Se rvice $ 532 ,114 $ 730 ,000 $ 197 ,886 Revenue : Charges for Services increase. Miscellaneous income increase due to an estimated increase in Interest Earnings . Expenditures: 4.1% 150 .1% 8.0% 6.0% 17.7% 37.2% Personnel costs increase due to the Merit Increase of 3.5% plus $42 ,000 budgeted in retirement payouts in FY25 , not in FY24. Also , there was an increase in overtime to reflect prior and current year actuals . 24-19

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission Operating costs increased due to increases in Recycling & Processing , Disposal Fee costs , Radio Replacements , and Roof Replacement making up the majority of that change . Capital costs increase due to Fleet Replacements. Debt Service costs increase with the addition of financing vehicles in FY24 that began payments in FY25. Solid Waste Fund Assumptions - Revenue Charges for Services : FY25 : +4% - Utility Rate FY26-30 : +0% A rate study will be done in the months ahead to determine rates moving forward from FY26 and beyond. Solid Waste Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries: FY26-30 : +3.5% Benefits: FY26-30 : +6% Operating: FY26-30: +2% Solid Waste Fund Overview (Detail - Page 50) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 110-111 The Solid Waste Fund Available Fund Balance in FY25 is at 15.9%, slightly over the target of 15 %. The Fund Balance falls below 0% in FY26 mainly due to the fact as mentioned; the Revenue has zero growth in Utility Rates consistent with the prior year budgets. A new rate study is expected to begin this year into FY25 to determine the rates for the next three-to-five-year timeframe. They also have Lease Financing , Debt Proceeds in the Revenue section , which is for the leases for vehicles and equipment each year in the forecast FY25 - FY30. Quest ions for Staff Mr . Tyler explained the City has been leasing vehicles for Solid Waste for a number of years. Basically , every year a vehicle is needed for replacement. There is a quote from Bank of America and the City goes out to RFP every three or four years to update. Usually , there are five-year leases at the current market rate at the time . When the rate study is done , the consultant will look at the feasibility of moving to more pay-as-you-go rather than leasing. Leas ing rates have increased , and they vary year to year. • Water/Wastewater Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights 24-20

Budget Workshop minutes July 15 , 2024 Revenue Highlights Li censes , Pe rmi ts , Fees Charg es for Se rvices Miscellaneo us Expend iti.-es Hi gt-.i ghts Perso mel Ope ratirg Ca pita l Revenue : FY 2024 Adopted $ 312,000 $ 22,763,100 $ 40 7,500 $ 7,577 ,03 0 $ 10 ,972 ,910 $ 18,60 1,842 Dunedin City Commission FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change $ 200 ,000 $ (11 2,000 ) -3 5.9% $ 23,88 3,800 $ 1,120,700 4.9% $ 582 ,500 $ 175,00 0 42 .9% $ 7,442,429 $ (1 34,601) -1.8% $ 12,428 ,313 $ 1,455 ,403 13.3% $ 11 ,690 ,700 $ (6,91 1, 142) -37 2 % Li censes , Permits , Fees have decreased due to an estimated reduction in Water/ Sewer Im pact Fees in FY25 . Charges for Serv ices increased due to the overall increase in the water rate fees of abou t 5%. Miscellaneous Revenues increased due to the Interest Earnings . Expenditures : Personnel costs have decreased due to a different allocation for the Engineer/Util ities to distr ibute their time with General Fund and Stormwater Fund pro j ects . General Fund - $300 ,000 - Stormwater Fund -$180 ,000 . The allocation will be monitored on a monthly basis and adjusted quarterly or every six months during FY25 if necessary . Operating costs increased significantly this year mainly due to the IT Serv ices Fund alloca ti on increase of $190 ,000 ; there was an increase in Water Distribution Repairs & Maintenance - $439 ,000 for Registers and Large Meters. The Facilities ISF allocation increased $56 ,000 . The wo-way radios are projected to be $153 ,000 ; Insurance, Liability , and Property is estima ted to be a $122 ,000 increase , and Water Admin / Repair & Ma intenance costs increased $100 ,000 for harden ing interior for windows and so forth. Capital costs decreased due mainly to some projects budgeted in FY24 but not in FY25 : Lofty Pines $1.1 Million Electr ical Grid Upgrade Wastewater Plant - $9 Million Wastewater Plant Facility Basin Rehab - $1.6 Million SCADA Upgrade System - $970 ,000 Water/Wastewater Fund Assumptions - Revenue Charges for Services : FY26-30 : +0% Water/Wastewater Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries : FY26-30: +3 .5% Benefits : FY26-30: +6% Operating : FY26-30 : +2% Transfers Out: FY25-30 to Penny Fund for share of New City Hall debt serv ice payments $468 ,600 per year . 24-21

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission Water/Wastewater Fund Overview (Detail - Page 53) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 112-115 The Fund Balance Net Position at the end of FY25 is 23.3% , close to that department's 25% goal. There is no rate increase from FY26 - FY30 over the five-year time frame in the assumptions . The fund has large increases in Operating costs and Capital costs since COVID-19. There were a few new large projects that were new last year , but still required by State law that need to be completed by the 2032 timeframe. The two projects total approximately $14 Million in total and are in the Long Range Plan : these are the Deep Well Injection and Wastewater Treatment Plant Reclaimed Storage Tank. Large negatives are seen in the outer years because there are no increases ; the rate study that was just started will be completed and there will be a three or five-year plan and new ord inance with the results of the study. Mr . Tyler advised it is likely a project in the amount of $190 ,000 , which will be added to the FY25 Budget prior to Budget Workshop #3. Discussion ensued regarding the status after the fire at the Water Plant. • Stormwater Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change Reveooe Higtjgt-.s Wergovernrnerial $ - $ 38 1,000 $ 381 ,00 0 Charges fo r SeMces $ 4,290 ,000 $ 5,350 ,000 $ 1,060 ,000 Expend illles li gt1gt-.s Persome l $ 1,336 ,904 $ 1,497 ,569 $ 160 ,665 Opera ting $ 2,208 ,373 $ 3,803 ,799 $ 1,595 ,426 Cap ital $ 1,250 ,000 $ 2,219 ,632 $ 969 ,632 Revenue: %Change NIA 24 .7% 12.0% 72.2 % 77.6% For Intergovernmental increase in FY25 , there is a FEP Resilient Florida Program award. Charge for services increased due to the rate increase in FY25 in the Stormwater Fund. Expenditures: Personnel cost increased due to the Merit Increase of 3.5% in FY25 and the Engineering allocat ion to be monitored throughout the year Operating costs increased mainly due to the Gabion Repairs at $762 ,000 and the Pipelining at $620 ,000 ; also , the ISF for the IT Services was at $68 ,000 and the two-way radios were at $102 ,000 . Capital costs increased due to new projects in FY25 such as the Stormwater Infrastructure Repa ir/Replacement Project at $500 ,000; Ditch Maintenance Program - $250,000; and Stormwater Circuit TV Inspection - $286 ,000 not in the FY24 Budget. Stormwater Fund Assumptions - Revenue Charges for Services : FY25 : +24.7% 24-22

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 FY26: +29.9% FY27: +19 .2% FY28-30 : 0% Sto rmwater Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries : FY26-30: +3.5% Benefits : FY26-30 : +6% Operating: FY26-30 : +2% Stormwater Fund Overview (Detail - Page 56) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 116-119 Dunedin City Commission Available Fund Balance - $401 ,000 projected at the end of FY25 ; it does go below zero in FY26 and FY28. It will take some time to build reserves in this fund. The new rates will make that happen ; however , it will take a couple of years. In FY2026 , the City will likely need to issue financing to provide cash flow fo r some of the projects planned for FY26 & FY27 ; that will probably be $2 Mill ion to $3 Million . That is not in this plan and will continue to be monitored. • Marina Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change Reveooe HigNights Miscellaneous $ 604 ,365 $ 650 ,480 $ 46 ,115 7.6% Experditlles Higtiights Operating $ 276 ,322 $ 304 ,725 $ 28 ,403 10.3% Capita l $ 6,000 $ 150,000 $ 144 ,000 2400 .0% Revenue : Miscellaneous increase due to a proposed 10% increase in the boat slip rental fees in FY25 in the proposed budget now. Expenditures : The Operating increase is due mainly to an increase of $10 ,000 for construction service costs for fence work and gate repairs and tree trimming , and a $14 ,000 increase is estima ted in Property Liability Insurance at this time. Capital costs increased due to the FY25 Budget including Design costs for the Dock A Replacement- $150 ,000 , which was $0 in FY24. Marina Fund Assumptions - Revenue Charges for Services: FY26-30: 0% Miscellaneous: FY26-30: 0% Boat Slip Rentals Transient Boat Slip Rentals 24-23

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Interest Revenue Dunedin Fish Co. Lease Marina Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries: FY26-30: +3 .5% Benefits: FY26-30: +6% Operating: FY26-30 : +2% Marina Fund Overview (Detail - Page 59) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 120-121 Dunedin City Commission The Available Fund Balance is over the 25% target in FY25 & FY26, then it drops below the target beginning in FY27 - FY30 mainly due to the fact that there are no rate increases in FY26 - FY30; the proposal right now is flat. The Marina Master Plan Study is underway and once complete , the proposed plan along with the financial impact and financial plan will assist in determining the need for slip rental increases in FY26 and beyond. City staff is working to prepare a long-range forecast for the future cost estimates and needed funding streams to fund the capita l projects over the next 10-year time frame . Questions for Staff ► Suggestion for a footnote here to clarify because when looking at the rates , there were multiple rate increases to get caught up over the years , but they did not want to enact anything until the Master Plan. LUNCH 12:00 P.M. -12 :45 P.M. • Golf Operations Fund Revenue & Expenditure Highlights FY 2024 Adopted Reveooe Higti igtts Cha rges for Services $ 417,500 MiscellaneoLS $ 740 ,000 Debt Proceeds $ 2,500 ,000 Transfers ., $ 234 ,860 Expeooitlles Higtigtts Personnel $ 348 ,409 Opera ti rYJ $ 1,1 93 ,025 Capital $ 2,500 ,000 Revenue: FY 2025 Proposed $ Change % Change $ 3,595 ,919 $ 3,178 ,419 76 1.3% $ 10 ,000 $ (730 ,000 ) -98 .6% $ - $ (2,500 ,000 ) -100 .0% $ - $ (234 ,860 ) -100 .0% $ 752 ,900 $ 404 ,49 1 11 6.1% $ 2,180 ,006 $ 986 ,98 1 82 .7% $ - $ (2 ,500 ,000 ) -100 .0% Charges for Services FY25 increase includes revenue from member dues and green fees and public play from the November 1, 2024 , to September 30 , 2025, timeframe. Member dues increased from $416 ,000 to $890 ,000 from FY24 to FY25. The member dues revenue from FY24 was really November during the shutdown , and the dues for next year are the course reopen ing on November 1 through the 11-month period . Public Play is budgeted at $2.6 Million 24-24

Budget Workshop minutes July 15, 2024 Dunedin City Commission in FY25 ; that was $0 in FY24 due to the closure that took place on March 1. Cart Rentals in FY25 are not in FY24 . Miscellaneous decrease compared to FY24 that included an estimate of a cash contribution from the Golf Club of $740 ,000 ; this year , $700 ,000 was received so far from the Club in March 2024. One more payment is expected from the Club in the near future and that will be sl ightly more than the $740 ,000 estimate . Debt Proceeds decreased with the loan for the Golf Course Restoration project that took place in FY24 , and there are no loans expected in FY25. Transfers In decreased ; FY24 included a one-time transfer of Capital Reserve funding that was in the General Fund for the Golf Course , and that was moved to the Golf Operations Fund to pay for part of the Golf Course Restoration . Expenditures : Personnel costs increased due to FY25 including a full year of salaries ; FY24 was abou t one- half year of salaries. Operating costs increased due mainly to an increase of Ground Maintenance costs of about $163 ,000 , the ISF Building cost of $130 ,000 , Credit Card Transaction Fees of $78 ,000 , and Tree Service increase of $98,000 . Capita l decrease was the amount of the Golf Course Operat ions Fund 's contribution to the Golf Course Renovation in FY24 , wh ich is budgeted in FY24 and not in FY25 . It is expected to be completed by October of this year. Golf Operations Fund Assumptions - Revenue Charges for Services : FY26: +4% FY27-30: +1% Golf Operations Fund Assumptions - Expenditures Salaries: FY26-30 : +3.5% Benefits: FY26-30: +6% Operating: FY26-30 : +2% Golf Operations Fund Overview - (Detail - Page 62) FY 2025 Proposed Budget Book Pages 122-123 Estimated Fund Balance at the end of FY25 is $305 ,000 ; this includes the time period of the closure of the Course from March to October 31 . The FY24 Estimate column in the Budget Book shows the actual bank loan proceeds for the Golf Course Restoration project ; there was also a loan for the purchase of golf carts dur ing the current year. There is an increase in FY26 for Charge for Services for Members ' Dues and Outside Play of 4% , which is because of the full 12 months in FY26. There are some activities taking place in FY24 beginning now , i.e. projects moving forward in the near future to provide a temporary maintenance facility solution for the Golf Course . This includes the demolition of some of the current Maintenance Facility Building , renting a trailer 24-25

Budget Works

1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING BUDGET WORKSHOP CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE JULY 15, 2024 9:00 AM AGENDA AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. BUSINESS 1.a. FY 2025 Budget Workshop # 2; FY 2025 Proposed Operating & Capital Budget Topic for Discussion EXHIBIT: A. Background Budget workshop # 2 - 07 15 24 EXHIBIT: B. FY 2025 - 2030 CIP BPI by Fund EXHIBIT: C. FY 2025 PROPOSED BUDGET EXHIBIT: D. FY 2025 Budget Presentation 1.b. City Manager Opening Remarks Topic for Discussion 1.c. Follow-Up: FY 2025 Budget Workshop #1 Topic for Discussion EXHIBIT: A. Follow Up Memo 6.5.2024 Workshop 1.d. Revenue, Expenditures and Projections - All Funds Topic for Discussion 1 ) Base Line Assumptions 2) Long Range Fund Projections • General Fund • Stadium Fund

2 • Impact Fee Fund • Public Art Fund • Building Fund • County Gas Tax Fund • Penny Fund • ARPA Fund • CRA Fund • Solid Waste Fund • Water/Wastewater Fund • Stormwater Fund • Marina Fund • Golf Operations Fund • Fleet Fund • Facilities Maintenance Fund • Risk Safety Fund • Health Benefits Fund • IT Services Fund 1.e. Position Requests for FY 2025 Budget Topic for Discussion EXHIBIT: A. Staffing History through FY 2024.pdf EXHIBIT: B. FY 2025 Personnel Requests.pdf EXHIBIT: C. New Positions - Estimated Cost by Fund.pdf 1.f. Proposed Future Benefits Topic for Discussion EXHIBIT: A. Proposed Future Benefits.pdf 1.g. City Commission Direction Topic for Discussion ADJOURN MEETING Disability Provisions: It is the policy of the City of Dunedin not to discriminate against disabled persons in employment or the provisions of services. If you have a disability that requires accommodation, please notify the ADA Coordinator 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting at (727) 298-3043. COPIES OF THIS AND ALL COMMISSION AGENDAS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE, ON THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE. COPIES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT WWW.DUNEDINGOV.COM.

>> HELLO, >> HELLO, STAFF. >> HELLO, STAFF. HOPE >> HELLO, STAFF. HOPE YOU >> HELLO, STAFF. HOPE YOU HAD >> HELLO, STAFF. HOPE YOU HAD A >> HELLO, STAFF. HOPE YOU HAD A GREAT >> HELLO, STAFF. HOPE YOU HAD A GREAT WEEKEND, HOPE YOU HAD A GREAT WEEKEND, COMMISSION. COMMISSION. SO THE EXPECTATION TODAY IS TO SO THE EXPECTATION TODAY IS TO CONVEY A GREAT DEAL OF CONVEY A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION TO THE CITY INFORMATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION SO THAT YOU'LL HAVE COMMISSION SO THAT YOU'LL HAVE IT ON YOUR RADAR FOR BUDGET IT ON YOUR RADAR FOR BUDGET WORKSHOP NUMBER 3. WORKSHOP NUMBER 3. WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY DECISIONS TODAY. DECISIONS TODAY. I'M SURE WE'LL HAVE SOME GOOD I'M SURE WE'LL HAVE SOME GOOD DISCUSSION OR, WELL, ACTUALLY DISCUSSION OR, WELL, ACTUALLY IT'S A WORKSHOP SO CONSENSUS IT'S A WORKSHOP SO CONSENSUS DIRECTION TODAY REALLY ON ANY OF DIRECTION TODAY REALLY ON ANY OF THESE ITEMS. THESE ITEMS. WE JUST WANT TO -- AS I SAID, WE JUST WANT TO -- AS I SAID, CONVEY THE INFORMATION TO ALL OF CONVEY THE INFORMATION TO ALL OF YOU, BE AVAILABLE TO ASK ANY YOU, BE AVAILABLE TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE, AND QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE, AND THEN ROLL THAT INTO BUDGET THEN ROLL THAT INTO BUDGET WORKSHOP NUMBER 3 SO WITH THAT WORKSHOP NUMBER 3 SO WITH THAT I'LL HAND IT OVER TO LES. I'LL HAND IT OVER TO LES. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. THANK >> OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, GOOD MORNING, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS. COMMISSIONERS. LES TYLER, THE FINANCE DIRECTOR. LES TYLER, THE FINANCE DIRECTOR. >> IS IT ON? >> IS IT ON? >> IS IT ON? >> >> IS IT ON? >> AND >> IS IT ON? >> AND I'M >> IS IT ON? >> AND I'M HERE >> IS IT ON? >> AND I'M HERE ASHLEY >> IS IT ON? >> AND I'M HERE ASHLEY KIMPTEN, >> AND I'M HERE ASHLEY KIMPTEN, >> AND I'M HERE ASHLEY KIMPTEN, THE >> AND I'M HERE ASHLEY KIMPTEN, THE BUDGET >> AND I'M HERE ASHLEY KIMPTEN, THE BUDGET MANAGER. THE BUDGET MANAGER. IT'S ON NOW, YEAH. IT'S ON NOW, YEAH. [LAUGHTER] [LAUGHTER] >> SLOW START HERE. >> SLOW START HERE. >> SLOW START HERE. WE >> SLOW START HERE. WE GOT >> SLOW START HERE. WE GOT THIS. WE GOT THIS. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. >> OKAY. I'LL >> OKAY. I'LL NUMBER >> OKAY. I'LL NUMBER 3. I'LL NUMBER 3. OKAY STARTING WITH FOLLOW-UP OKAY STARTING WITH FOLLOW-UP ITEMS, WITHIN YOUR PACKET AND ITEMS, WITHIN YOUR PACKET AND ITEM 1C, THERE IS A LIST OF 19 ITEM 1C, THERE IS A LIST OF 19 ITEMS THAT ARE FOLLOW-UP, AND ITEMS THAT ARE FOLLOW-UP, AND I'LL ASK THE COMMISSION IF YOU I'LL ASK THE COMMISSION IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ANY SPECIFIC WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ON THOSE OR IF YOU QUESTIONS ON THOSE OR IF YOU WOULD LIKE STAFF TO WALK THROUGH WOULD LIKE STAFF TO WALK THROUGH THOSE. THOSE. WE CAN DO IT HOWEVER YOU WOULD WE CAN DO IT HOWEVER YOU WOULD LIKE. LIKE. >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO BRING >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP >> OKAY, ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP FROM YOU WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP FROM THE FOLLOWIA ITEMS, JOHN. THE FOLLOWIA ITEMS, JOHN. >> I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT >> I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT >> I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT WALKED >> I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT WALKED THROUGH. WALKED THROUGH. >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM AT >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM AT A >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM AT A HIGH >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM AT A HIGH LEVEL, >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM AT A HIGH LEVEL, AND >> OKAY, I'LL WALK THROUGH THEM AT A HIGH LEVEL, AND ANY AT A HIGH LEVEL, AND ANY QUESTIONS, LET ME KNOW. QUESTIONS, LET ME KNOW. THE FIRST ONE IS NUMBER 1, IS THE FIRST ONE IS NUMBER 1, IS HAS TO DO WITH WE, WE HAD A HAS TO DO WITH WE, WE HAD A QUESTION AT THE LAST COMMISSION QUESTION AT THE LAST COMMISSION MEETING. MEETING. OUR GENERAL FUND HAD AN OUR GENERAL FUND HAD AN OPERATING ASELFTION INCREASE OF OPERATING ASELFTION INCREASE OF 2% -- ASSUMPTION INCREASE OF 2% 2% -- ASSUMPTION INCREASE OF 2% EVERY YEAR. EVERY YEAR. WE LOOKED AT THAT AND RAISED WE LOOKED AT THAT AND RAISED 2.5% IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN AND 2.5% IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN AND WE WILL GO OVER THE GENERAL FUND WE WILL GO OVER THE GENERAL FUND LONG RANGE PLAN, BUT WE DID LONG RANGE PLAN, BUT WE DID INCREASE IT TO 2.5 IN THE OUTER INCREASE IT TO 2.5 IN THE OUTER YEARS. YEARS. THE SECOND ONE WAS WE TALKED THE SECOND ONE WAS WE TALKED LAST MEETING ABOUT RADIO LAST MEETING ABOUT RADIO PURCHASES. PURCHASES. WE HAD A $510,000 RADIO PURCHASE WE HAD A $510,000 RADIO PURCHASE FOR MULTIPLE CITY FUNDS AND FOR MULTIPLE CITY FUNDS AND DEPARTMENTS. DEPARTMENTS. WE CREATED A PROJECT PAGE FOR WE CREATED A PROJECT PAGE FOR THAT THAT WAS NOT IN THE THAT THAT WAS NOT IN THE BUSINESS PLAN, AND THAT'S BUSINESS PLAN, AND THAT'S ATTACHED TO YOUR FOLLOW-UP MEMO ATTACHED TO YOUR FOLLOW-UP MEMO HERE, BUT ALSO WANT TO MENTION HERE, BUT ALSO WANT TO MENTION THAT SINCE THE LAST MEETING, THE THAT SINCE THE LAST MEETING, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS NEEDS FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS NEEDS FOR RADIOS AS WELL, SO WE'VE ATED -- RADIOS AS WELL, SO WE'VE ATED -- ADDED IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ADDED IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RADIO ESTIMATES FOR THE NEXT RADIO ESTIMATES FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, AND SO THAT PROJECT FIVE YEARS, AND SO THAT PROJECT NOW INCLUDES $510,000 FOR NOW INCLUDES $510,000 FOR GENERAL CITY EMPLOYEES AND THEN GENERAL CITY EMPLOYEES AND THEN ABOUT $450,000 FOR THE RADIOS ABOUT $450,000 FOR THE RADIOS REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. SO THE PROJECT PAGE IS SO THE PROJECT PAGE IS $960,000 OVER A SIX-YEAR PERIOD $960,000 OVER A SIX-YEAR PERIOD SO I WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. SO I WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. THAT'S ONE CHANGE SINCE THE LAST THAT'S ONE CHANGE SINCE THE LAST MEETING. MEETING. THE CITY COMMISSION NUMBER 3 THE CITY COMMISSION NUMBER 3 ASKED FOR CITYWIDE VACANCIES. ASKED FOR CITYWIDE VACANCIES. HR HAS COMPILED A LIST THAT'S HR HAS COMPILED A LIST THAT'S ATTACHED THAT'S B, C, AND D IN ATTACHED THAT'S B, C, AND D IN YOUR TBAWLOUP MEMO THAT GOES -- YOUR TBAWLOUP MEMO THAT GOES -- FUELOUP MEMO THAT GOES THROUGH A FUELOUP MEMO THAT GOES THROUGH A STATUS OF VACANCIES AND A LIST STATUS OF VACANCIES AND A LIST OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION INITIATIVES. INITIATIVES. NUMBER 230UR CITY STAFF ASKED IF NUMBER 230UR CITY STAFF ASKED IF COMMISSION COULD REQUIRE THE COMMISSION COULD REQUIRE THE CAUSEWAY RESTROOM RENOVATION AT CAUSEWAY RESTROOM RENOVATION AT THE SAME TIME AS THE ROOF. THE SAME TIME AS THE ROOF. STAFF IS WORKING ON A PLAN TO DO STAFF IS WORKING ON A PLAN TO DO THAT AT THE SAME TIME NOW. THAT AT THE SAME TIME NOW. THE NEXT ITEM NUMBER 5, CITY THE NEXT ITEM NUMBER 5, CITY COMMISSION ASKED IF THE POOL, COMMISSION ASKED IF THE POOL, CLASSROOM, ROOF REPLACEMENT, CLASSROOM, ROOF REPLACEMENT, SHOULD BE PART OF THE HIGHLANDER SHOULD BE PART OF THE HIGHLANDER AQUATIC COMPLEX PROJECT, AND AQUATIC COMPLEX PROJECT, AND STAFF FEELS THAT THEY SHOULD BE STAFF FEELS THAT THEY SHOULD BE TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS AND STAND TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS AND STAND ALONE, AND THE PLAN IS TO GET ALONE, AND THE PLAN IS TO GET THE ROOF DONE AS SOON AS THE ROOF DONE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS A STAND ALONE POSSIBLE AS A STAND ALONE PROJECT. PROJECT. >> I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION IF I >> I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION IF I >> I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION IF I MAY. MAY. >> MM-HMM. >> MM-HMM. >> MM-HMM. >> >> MM-HMM. >> SO >> MM-HMM. >> SO ON >> MM-HMM. >> SO ON THE >> MM-HMM. >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY >> MM-HMM. >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I KNOW >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I KNOW WE >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I KNOW WE TALKED >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I KNOW WE TALKED A >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I KNOW WE TALKED A LITTLE >> SO ON THE CAUSEWAY BATHROOMS, I KNOW WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT I KNOW WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT, AND THEN THE ABOUT THAT, AND THEN THE RESPONSE. RESPONSE. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING WE WERE IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING WE WERE DOING THOSE THIS YEAR. DOING THOSE THIS YEAR. IS THAT NOT CORRECT? IS THAT NOT CORRECT? >> I THINK SUE HAD'S GOT IT, >> I THINK SUE HAD'S GOT IT, >> I THINK SUE HAD'S GOT IT, MM-HMM. MM-HMM. >> THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- IT >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- IT IS >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- IT IS IN >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- IT IS IN THE >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- IT IS IN THE PROCESS >> THAT IS CORRECT. WE -- IT IS IN THE PROCESS RIGHT WE -- IT IS IN THE PROCESS RIGHT NOW. NOW. THE QUESTION REALLY WAS RELATED THE QUESTION REALLY WAS RELATED TO THE ROOF REPAIRS, WHICH WE'VE TO THE ROOF REPAIRS, WHICH WE'VE DONE A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF DONE A FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THOSE. THOSE. THE ROOF DOES NOT NEED TO BE THE ROOF DOES NOT NEED TO BE REPLACED. REPLACED. IT SIMPLY NEEDS TO, IT'S A METAL IT SIMPLY NEEDS TO, IT'S A METAL ROOF, SO IT NEEDS TO HAVE SOME ROOF, SO IT NEEDS TO HAVE SOME REPAIR, AND THEN TO BE SEALED REPAIR, AND THEN TO BE SEALED AND THAT IS CURRENTLY IN AND THAT IS CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS TO DO AT THE SAME TIME, PROGRESS TO DO AT THE SAME TIME, SO WE ONLY HAVE THE BATHROOMS SO WE ONLY HAVE THE BATHROOMS NOW WITH PORTABLE BATHROOMS FOR NOW WITH PORTABLE BATHROOMS FOR A SHORTER PERIOD OF TIME. A SHORTER PERIOD OF TIME. >> THANK YOU, SUE. >> THANK YOU, SUE. >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO YOU'RE >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO YOU'RE SAYING >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO YOU'RE SAYING IT >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO YOU'RE SAYING IT IS, >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO YOU'RE SAYING IT IS, IT >> THANK YOU, SUE. SO YOU'RE SAYING IT IS, IT IS SO YOU'RE SAYING IT IS, IT IS BEING DONE THIS YEAR. BEING DONE THIS YEAR. >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT'S, >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT'S, THAT'S >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT >> YES, THAT IS CORRECT. >> THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M >> THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M >> THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M OBSERVING >> THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M OBSERVING AND >> THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M OBSERVING AND WATCHING. OBSERVING AND WATCHING. >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> I >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> I DON'T >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> I DON'T HAVE >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> I DON'T HAVE AN >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT >> Mayor Bujalski: WHEN? >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE BECAUSE >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE BECAUSE WE >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE BECAUSE WE HAVE >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE BECAUSE WE HAVE SEPARATED >> I DON'T HAVE AN EXACT DATE BECAUSE WE HAVE SEPARATED OUT BECAUSE WE HAVE SEPARATED OUT ALL THE TASKS INSTEAD OF PUTTING ALL THE TASKS INSTEAD OF PUTTING IT OUT TO BID WITH ONE GIANT IT OUT TO BID WITH ONE GIANT CONTRACT. CONTRACT. SO WE ARE WAITING ON THE VERY SO WE ARE WAITING ON THE VERY FIRST TRADE TO GET STARTED, FIRST TRADE TO GET STARTED, WHICH IS REMOVAL OF THE TILE AND WHICH IS REMOVAL OF THE TILE AND THE PLUMBING FIXTURES. THE PLUMBING FIXTURES. SO I EXPECT TO HEAR BACK, WE SO I EXPECT TO HEAR BACK, WE HAVE TO HAVE THREE QUOTES, ON HAVE TO HAVE THREE QUOTES, ON EACH OF THE TRADES. EACH OF THE TRADES. >> Mayor Bujalski: I DON'T MEAN >> Mayor Bujalski: I DON'T MEAN >> Mayor Bujalski: I DON'T MEAN TO >> Mayor Bujalski: I DON'T MEAN TO DRAG >> Mayor Bujalski: I DON'T MEAN TO DRAG THIS >> Mayor Bujalski: I DON'T MEAN TO DRAG THIS ON. TO DRAG THIS ON. COMPLETED? COMPLETED? >> YES, COMPLETED. >> YES, COMPLETED. >> YES, COMPLETED. >> >> YES, COMPLETED. >> THE >> YES, COMPLETED. >> THE WORK >> YES, COMPLETED. >> THE WORK SHOULD >> YES, COMPLETED. >> THE WORK SHOULD TAKE >> YES, COMPLETED. >> THE WORK SHOULD TAKE ABOUT >> YES, COMPLETED. >> THE WORK SHOULD TAKE ABOUT 30 >> THE WORK SHOULD TAKE ABOUT 30 >> THE WORK SHOULD TAKE ABOUT 30 DAYS. DAYS. >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY. >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY. >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY. >> >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY. >> WHEN >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY. >> WHEN IT'S >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY. >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> Mayor >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> Mayor Bujalski: >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY, >> WHEN IT'S BEGINS. >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY, THANK >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY, THANK >> Mayor Bujalski: OKAY, THANK YOU. YOU. >> MM-HMM.3 >> MM-HMM.3 >> MM-HMM.3 >> >> MM-HMM.3 >> OKAY >> MM-HMM.3 >> OKAY NEXT >> MM-HMM.3 >> OKAY NEXT ITEM >> MM-HMM.3 >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS >> MM-HMM.3 >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER >> MM-HMM.3 >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, WHICH >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, WHICH IS >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, WHICH IS COMMISSION >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, WHICH IS COMMISSION ASKED >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, WHICH IS COMMISSION ASKED IF >> OKAY NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 6, WHICH IS COMMISSION ASKED IF THE WHICH IS COMMISSION ASKED IF THE DOWNTOWN LOOPER SERVICE COULD BE DOWNTOWN LOOPER SERVICE COULD BE PARTIALLY FUNDED BY THE CRA PARTIALLY FUNDED BY THE CRA FUND. FUND. STAFF'S LOOKED INTO THIS AND STAFF'S LOOKED INTO THIS AND BASED ON A REVIEW OF THE CRA BASED ON A REVIEW OF THE CRA BUDGET, WITH OVER $20 MILLION IN BUDGET, WITH OVER $20 MILLION IN ONGOING CAPITAL PROJECTS AND ONGOING CAPITAL PROJECTS AND PROJECTED ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE OF PROJECTED ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE OF ABOUT $1.2 MILLION PER YEAR IN ABOUT $1.2 MILLION PER YEAR IN THE OUTER YEARS, WE FEEL THE CRA THE OUTER YEARS, WE FEEL THE CRA FUND DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY FUND DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO FUND THE ONGOING DOWNTOWN TO FUND THE ONGOING DOWNTOWN LOOPER SERVICE OR A PORTION OF LOOPER SERVICE OR A PORTION OF IT. IT. NEXT IS NUMBER 7. NEXT IS NUMBER 7. >> DID YOU DO NUMBER 5, LES? >> DID YOU DO NUMBER 5, LES? >> DID YOU DO NUMBER 5, LES? >> >> DID YOU DO NUMBER 5, LES? >> OH, >> DID YOU DO NUMBER 5, LES? >> OH, SORRY, >> DID YOU DO NUMBER 5, LES? >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. NUMBER >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. NUMBER 5, >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. NUMBER 5, CITY >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. NUMBER 5, CITY COMMISSION >> OH, SORRY, YEAH. NUMBER 5, CITY COMMISSION ASKED NUMBER 5, CITY COMMISSION ASKED IF THE POOL CLASSROOM ROOF IF THE POOL CLASSROOM ROOF REPLACEMENT SHOULD BE PART OF REPLACEMENT SHOULD BE PART OF THE HIGHLANDER AND WE THINK THAT THE HIGHLANDER AND WE THINK THAT SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE PROJECT, SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE PROJECT, YEAH, THAT SHOULD NOT BE PART OF YEAH, THAT SHOULD NOT BE PART OF THE HIGHLANDER AQUATIC COMPLEX. THE HIGHLANDER AQUATIC COMPLEX. >> I DIDN'T HEAR YOU. >> I DIDN'T HEAR YOU. >> I DIDN'T HEAR YOU. IT >> I DIDN'T HEAR YOU. IT SHOULD >> I DIDN'T HEAR YOU. IT SHOULD BE >> I DIDN'T HEAR YOU. IT SHOULD BE WHAT? IT SHOULD BE WHAT? >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE A >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE A STAND >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE PROJECT, >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE PROJECT, THE >> WE THINK THAT THAT SHOULD BE A STAND ALONE PROJECT, THE ROOF, A STAND ALONE PROJECT, THE ROOF, AND NOT PART OF THE HIGHLANDER AND NOT PART OF THE HIGHLANDER AQUATIC COMPLEX PROJECT. AQUATIC COMPLEX PROJECT. >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I CAME >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I CAME IN >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I CAME IN LATE, >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I CAME IN LATE, MY >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I CAME IN LATE, MY APOLOGIES >> Mayor Bujalski: I'M SORRY, I CAME IN LATE, MY APOLOGIES TO CAME IN LATE, MY APOLOGIES TO EVERYBODY. EVERYBODY. MY HUSBAND'S TRUCK BROKE DOWN MY HUSBAND'S TRUCK BROKE DOWN THIS MORNING, AND I HAD TO DEAL THIS MORNING, AND I HAD TO DEAL WITH THAT. WITH THAT. BUT ARE WE GOING OVER THIS LIST BUT ARE WE GOING OVER THIS LIST ITEM BY ITEM BECAUSE NORMALLY WE ITEM BY ITEM BECAUSE NORMALLY WE JUST DO QUESTIONS. JUST DO QUESTIONS. >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED IT >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED IT TO >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED IT TO GO >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED IT TO GO THROUGH >> COMMISSIONER TORNGA REQUESTED IT TO GO THROUGH IT. IT TO GO THROUGH IT. >> Mayor Bujalski: ITEM BY ITEM, >> Mayor Bujalski: ITEM BY ITEM, >> Mayor Bujalski: ITEM BY ITEM, COMMISSIONER >> Mayor Bujalski: ITEM BY ITEM, COMMISSIONER TORNGA? COMMISSIONER TORNGA? >> YES. >> YES. >> YES. >> >> YES. >> Mayor >> YES. >> Mayor Bujalski: >> YES. >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU >> YES. >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS IS >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS IS GOING >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS IS GOING TO >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS IS GOING TO TAKE >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS IS GOING TO TAKE ABOUT >> Mayor Bujalski: YOU REALIZE THIS IS GOING TO TAKE ABOUT AN THIS IS GOING TO TAKE ABOUT AN HOUR? HOUR? >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> Mayor >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> Mayor Bujalski: >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, IT >> NO, IT SHOULD -- >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, IT IS. >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, IT IS. >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, IT IS. OKAY. OKAY. >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I WILL >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I WILL GO >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I WILL GO HIGH >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND >> DO YOU WANT TO TIME IT? >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU GUYS >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU GUYS LET >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU GUYS LET PEE >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU GUYS LET PEE KNOW >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU GUYS LET PEE KNOW IF >> I WILL GO HIGH LEVEL AND YOU GUYS LET PEE KNOW IF -- GUYS LET PEE KNOW IF -- >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE NORMALLY >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE NORMALLY WE >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE NORMALLY WE -- >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE NORMALLY WE -- EVERY >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE NORMALLY WE -- EVERY TIME >> Mayor Bujalski: YEAH, BECAUSE NORMALLY WE -- EVERY TIME WE'VE NORMALLY WE -- EVERY TIME WE'VE DONE IT, IT'S EXTENDED OUR DONE IT, IT'S EXTENDED OUR MEETING, AND I DON'T -- THAT'S MEETING, AND I DON'T -- THAT'S WHY I USUALLY TRY NOT TO UNLESS WHY I USUALLY TRY NOT TO UNLESS WE HAVE QUESTIONS. WE HAVE QUESTIONS. >> OKAY, I'LL TRY TO GO REAL -- >> OKAY, I'LL TRY TO GO REAL -- >> OKAY, I'LL TRY TO GO REAL -- HIGH >> OKAY, I'LL TRY TO GO REAL -- HIGH LEVEL. HIGH LEVEL. NUMBER 7, THE CITY COMMISSION NUMBER 7, THE CITY COMMISSION ASKED THAT JOLLEY TROLLEY ASKED THAT JOLLEY TROLLEY PROJECT SHOULD BE ONGOING. PROJECT SHOULD BE ONGOING. OUT TO 2030. OUT TO 2030. THERE WAS ALSO AN ADDITIONAL THERE WAS ALSO AN ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR STAFF TO WORK WITH REQUEST FOR STAFF TO WORK WITH PSTA AND OTHER PARTNERS TO PUSH PSTA AND OTHER PARTNERS TO PUSH THE SERVICE INCREASE TO EVERY 30 THE SERVICE INCREASE TO EVERY 30 MINUTES. MINUTES. STAFF, THAT WAS AN OVERSIGHT. STAFF, THAT WAS AN OVERSIGHT. WE HAD JOLLEY TROLLEY IN 25 WE HAD JOLLEY TROLLEY IN 25 ONLY, AND WE CORRECTED NOW THAT ONLY, AND WE CORRECTED NOW THAT THE CURRENT -- THE CURRENT COST THE CURRENT -- THE CURRENT COST OF JOLLEY TROLLEY IS IN ALL SIX OF JOLLEY TROLLEY IS IN ALL SIX YEARS IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN AND YEARS IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN AND ALSO IN THE PROJECT PAGE. ALSO IN THE PROJECT PAGE. IN ADDITION, THE COMMUNITY IN ADDITION, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY HAS REACHED OUT TO JOLLEY CITY HAS REACHED OUT TO JOLLEY TROLLEY TO INQUIRE ABOUT SOME TROLLEY TO INQUIRE ABOUT SOME INITIAL COST ESTIMATES FOR INITIAL COST ESTIMATES FOR INCREASED SERVICE TO EVERY 30 INCREASED SERVICE TO EVERY 30 MINUTES, AND HAS A MEETING MINUTES, AND HAS A MEETING SCHEDULE WITH FORWARD PINELLAS SCHEDULE WITH FORWARD PINELLAS FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE AND FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE AND SUGGESTIONS ON THAT. SUGGESTIONS ON THAT. >> Mayor Bujalski: IF I CAN MAKE >> Mayor Bujalski: IF I CAN MAKE >> Mayor Bujalski: IF I CAN MAKE A >> Mayor Bujalski: IF I CAN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, >> Mayor Bujalski: IF I CAN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, WHERE'S >> Mayor Bujalski: IF I CAN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, WHERE'S BOB. A RECOMMENDATION, WHERE'S BOB. HI. HI. YOU SHOULD TALK TO PSTA. YOU SHOULD TALK TO PSTA. RIGHT. RIGHT. YOU GUYS SHOULD BE -- YOU GUYS YOU GUYS SHOULD BE -- YOU GUYS SHOULD BE WORKING WITH PSTA SHOULD BE WORKING WITH PSTA BECAUSE THEY'RE THE OVERSEER OF, BECAUSE THEY'RE THE OVERSEER OF, THE JOLLEY TROLLEY NOT JOLLEY THE JOLLEY TROLLEY NOT JOLLEY TROLLEY. TROLLEY. >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS WORKING >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS WORKING WITH >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS WORKING WITH PSTA >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS WORKING WITH PSTA TO >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS WORKING WITH PSTA TO GET >> RIGHT, GEORGE'S STAFF, CATHY IS WORKING WITH PSTA TO GET THE IS WORKING WITH PSTA TO GET THE FINAL COST. FINAL COST. I THINK, GEORGE? I THINK, GEORGE? >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> Mayor >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> Mayor Bujalski: >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU KNOW, >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU KNOW, I >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU KNOW, I HAVE >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU KNOW, I HAVE OFFICIALLY >> Mayor Bujalski: JUST SO YOU KNOW, I HAVE OFFICIALLY SPOKEN KNOW, I HAVE OFFICIALLY SPOKEN WITH PSTA BOTH BRAD AND DARDEN WITH PSTA BOTH BRAD AND DARDEN RICE, AND ASKED THEM TO CONSIDER RICE, AND ASKED THEM TO CONSIDER DOING A NEW SERVICE GRANT AS DOING A NEW SERVICE GRANT AS WELL AS, TO PURSUE A PORTION OF WELL AS, TO PURSUE A PORTION OF FUNDING COMING FROM PSTA, THAT FUNDING COMING FROM PSTA, THAT WOULD BE THE GOAL SUNSHINE MY WOULD BE THE GOAL SUNSHINE MY OPINION, EXCUSE ME, GEORGE. OPINION, EXCUSE ME, GEORGE. THAT WOULD BE -- BECAUSE YOU THAT WOULD BE -- BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE OTHER HAVE TO HAVE THE OTHER COMMUNITIES PARTICIPATE COMMUNITIES PARTICIPATE OBVIOUSLY. OBVIOUSLY. IT ISN'T JUST DUNEDIN, TARPON, IT ISN'T JUST DUNEDIN, TARPON, CLEARWATER, COUNTY. CLEARWATER, COUNTY. >> Mayor Bujalski: RIGHT, THANK >> Mayor Bujalski: RIGHT, THANK >> Mayor Bujalski: RIGHT, THANK YOU. YOU. >> I FORGOT DARDEN WAS THERE >> I FORGOT DARDEN WAS THERE >> I FORGOT DARDEN WAS THERE THOUGH. THOUGH. THAT'S GOOD. THAT'S GOOD. >> OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 8. >> OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 8. >> OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 8. CITY >> OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 8. CITY COMMISSION >> OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 8. CITY COMMISSION PROPOSED >> OKAY, NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 8. CITY COMMISSION PROPOSED THAT CITY COMMISSION PROPOSED THAT THE BIKE PEDESTRIAN PROJECT PLAN THE BIKE PEDESTRIAN PROJECT PLAN COST IN FISCAL YEAR 25 BE COST IN FISCAL YEAR 25 BE INCREASED TO 75,000. INCREASED TO 75,000. STAFF HAS INCREASED THE FISCAL STAFF HAS INCREASED THE FISCAL YEAR BUDGET UP UP TO 75,000 FOR YEAR BUDGE