Code Compliance Hearings

>> Or do you want to participate in Here's a preview. This year's you know, here's a party here. Well, you can you can right there if you like you. Yeah. >> All right. Now will. You're going come. All right. We're on record for our code compliance. Special magistrate hearings. Today's date is October 16, 2000. 25. The first case in their our docket today, his city of Sarasota versus Arnold J. Yes. his trusty of the Arnold J. Ask What's the Ripple couple Trust you ad 8/1/2022 Brian Morris just quit says trust the the right of him. Quits. Revoke Ultra. So you ad. 8/1/2022 is this is case number 2025, 0, 0, 4, 4, 0, And I'll take some appearances here at the table here, ma'am. Your name for the record. >> Yes, good morning, Mariah Stl, formerly Mariah escalates. All right. us. >> your Patrick is still her husband. Okay. Very good. All >> Percy's me what I do with these cases are we start with the City of Sarasota and Mr. Spence's here for the city. He'll outline city's position on this. Then I'll come back and get your response case, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> Thing or sell us. This is to Continue case for a violation of Florida building code 105, 0.1 permits required. >> Where they're and renovations and restorations are done, which include framing drywall, plumbing, electrical HVAC work that were done without a permit. But before continue received a late yesterday afternoon Mister Arnold J I S quits. He had recently sold the property and he is no longer a party to this. You know, issue as of the 22. So the city is comfortable with dismissing him as a as a party to this. >> do I need to be specific here? I'm are dismissing Arnold J with his trusty. The Arnold J. The Oscars vocal. Iraqis know our list that we're really keeping Mariah Morris just with his trusty, correct? Okay. So let's let when we sort out who's who here, okay. So, ma'am, you're are you Mariah, Ryan? I'm Ryan O K. so you're not you're not Arnold. That's our all of okay. A very high. So are Arnold does so for your purposes woman who had issues a party to the proceedings? Yeah, I got up so that all and a smell. dismiss Arnold Jame mosque. Woods. As a party. >> May have a motion on that. >> You can certainly tell me what your what your what your position is on that. >> we went to a dissolution of marriage on this property and currently we're back in court regarding it because there's finds that are still associated back, taxes that are owed things that he's still responsible for, that he hasn't followed through it. So we're still it still hasn't been finalized even though I'm the owner as part of that transfer, there's still some things that he's in violation And so. To that I would consider him still party to it, even though he's not on the property itself. >> So let kind of sort this out a little bit for you. I I I'm a lawyer. I do divorce work as well. So there's different jurisdictions on in different courts. You know, so all of the issues regarding your marriage, Cedric said or property issues, all that none that I have no jurisdiction over any of that here. Okay. Side that this is this is a very narrow. I have a very near near what your station, my rule here is really for code enforcement violations are determine whether there is winter isn't one. There's 2 parties to these proceedings. There's the city and then there's the responded. So when city tells they that they don't want go forward with a particular responded, I have really no choice but to go ahead, Grant that. But this has no bearing on all the issues that you talked about. Snow. >> Correct. I just want put that to the I I appreciate it. So having said that bin so now I think Mr. Spence, maybe you can explain the city's position on this. >> Yes, your honor. We are pleased for that. We do see and that has been applied for for all the renovations that have taken place. It is currently pending contract directions looking at the notes as well as notes from the inspector. It's just missing a Sarasota well approval as one of the last few things that we needed so that we you know, reviewed and then issued. That's what's needed for a permit. Her out. >> Okay. So that was issued. I called talked to them yesterday. Talk to Matthew Miller at the Sarasota County talk and talk to Larry. So that should probably be in the system now. I know I talked to last week and then a fence and that's we council spoke with began the week. So when they had called me and told me that some of the pictures and they nibble see it because they knew that state system. So listen to the Well, they're going the writers straight up on it. So they need they just said, hey, send us pictures now going to care for okay. So, yeah, that should be completed already. >> Okay. We'll go into our system is not showing that there. We view it as a time devises go to the second floor speed with the permitting department. See if there's maybe some disconnect, maybe they have it and they've SA upload it or yeah, the county has an opponent yet. So we just checked with them. But with that said, it seems like, you know, on that just deals are definitely doing what they need to when we entered a lot, large, fine last hearing, cities come up with the put a right now and then it is. Well, I just know what no one up here the last 2 find to give somebody who hadn't. >> And stop the daily running fine. And I can revisit fines and costs be when we win that violations are brought into compliance. That I can always I was take a final fines and cost of that hearing. >> On the violations of fines. So the House is not going to be repairable. It's going to be we're going you're going to be a demo also, how is how we how we work around the fines is going to mobile home. >> But we'll work that out. So the bottom line I think what you do is get your permitting issued and you're probably to bring this thing in the compliance. Probably what you're going. All we needed guess is probably the demolition permit and completion of the demolition correct. And then we'll wrap the school. Bring this case back and wrap it up at that point. All consider all these issues and so personally paid are ready. >> So I'll go second from right Take care of the well thing. Get that situated. But talking with Ed executive for on second floor. >> member or a up on the 3rd that think it was all permitting. And it's right. It was the 3rd floor when I was rare, it was the 3rd floor. So I will be with him as well. Just to make sure have him get a hold of Matthew Matter. >> On on the well thing get that care go. >> All right. So what we'll do is we'll continue this out with proposed time and date that. >> Continue this case. we're looking right around the 45 day. Markets saying in time for the holidays, you're give them time to get the permit issued an open completed. We're looking at December 4th, the you guys. And taking here. so as of Thursday that that works or and you guys prefer mornings or afternoons. Mornings is good A 45? >> I dropped my son off at school. So it's always tight that swam up. >> what we do yet. 10 o'clock o'clock. We want to Thank you that. So cut it out to 10:00AM on December 4th, find a violation. Continue this 0.1. '05, 1, time. >> Benjamin modify the previous order. Stop the daily running fine. Look, everybody in this. Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much. So believe are calling Kyle Avery. I think very important. >> Thank you for calling a brain infection. This is Carolyn seeking help you live or calling someone that by the name of Kyle Hembree. This is Richard also magistrate at the City of Sarasota. Yes, get you over to Kyle just a moment. Bird. Mr. Henry, this is a rigid all serving as magistrate the City of Sarasota. Are you doing sir? >> doing well. Her well. Thank you. If you're ready, we'll go on record for your case, which I believe >> Appearing by phone on behalf of Big Jim the 8. So this is city of Sarasota versus being Jim, the 8, the LLC case, number 2025, 0, 0, 9, 6, 4, for the record. Kyle him Burries appearing on behalf of gym. Mr. Henry, I always start with the City of Sarasota, Mr. Spence's in this morning for the city saw outline the city's position on this. And I'll come right back to you, OK? >> all right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> Things are so is this is a new case for a violation of our Florida building. Code 105, 0.1 permits required well, where there was a fence that was installed without a permit pleas for that. We had a from issued and closed out as of September 30. >> Okay. Alright. Him, Mr. hopefully you Mr. Spence are you in agreement with that? Yes, we are. All right. Well, I will find it was a violation, 105, 0.1. But it was corrected on 9/3/2025 Savitt. That immediately takes us to the issue of fines and costs Mr. Spence's the city have a recommendation on that issue. We do your arm before I continue. I would like to make a note design did make a mistake on the fence permit. >> Yes, we agree with that was pulled and completed. defense is currently facing the wrong way, which is a violation of section 7 Dash 11. 0, one H which he's me. The fence has to be facing tough finish site out away from the property. Obviously that does not pertain to this case. We will show the closing that out today. But, you know, just avoid any future violations, Mr. Henry will need to have that turned around. But with that said, we do have a affidavit prepared by the inspector with a potential civil fine that had accrued from June 29th of 25 to September. 2nd for 66 days at $100 of their own. Bringing the potential civil fine to be $6,600 with 3 inspections of 390. This is not gonna be asking for any of fine, but we would like to recoup the city's cost are not so the tax burden by the process. Mr. you Mr. Smith's recommendation to me. >> I that he was recommending removal of I and I also know fence direction. I don't know because of the program. Ben, you what fence that was installed 1986 or a variant of of repairs and that date which preceded current code. reason came up was that we suffered fairly significant damage during hurricanes that hit last engage contractor to make a repair to the best. That was only at that point in time what we were doing, something we were informed did not require a permit that became bored with this That's requirement for us put in the proper permit for events from the 1980's. I am a little concerned and the idea that we would have to now go back and rebuild entire offense or pay any fines on something that that which it went. >> Okay. and we look a sort this one out a little Have you here, Mr. Mr. Him or his position is, well, the fence was that way since 82 evolving bought into said the violation only incurred because had to repair the fence. What's it? What's your response to that restaurants? That we show no records of there being a fence permit to begin with. >> So even though it may have been there since that day in time, we don't show anything reflecting, you know, offense be permitted to begin with. So would have had place. has no record of offense permit ever being apply direct for that property. >> Mr. To be ice on this one at the city's recommended, no fines, all accept that. I think on on the cost, I oppose the cost of 3.90, on the on the issue of the fence have to be turned around. That is the city code. Now. I can tell you that from personal experience. So I would talk to them about that, which what needs to be done before the anybody generates any kind of case on this. Okay. the is that the good side of the fence has to face your neighbors. What amounts to see what you may want to check on that? Okay. Before anything goes on, better better to head it off administratively. But the for today's purposes, no fine. Just the city's cost 3.90, medicals out the case of Bill. Good luck, Mister number. I'm >> I'm having a little trouble hearing. You can you? Can you tell me what cost is that you're saying? You're sensing honest reviews. 3.90. Re. $9319. >> would just I think you may want to call it, you know, call the building department to try to get to get a handle on that issue before anything gets generated. Okay. >> All right. I do appreciate that. Thank you very much. Thank u of I. >> know, shot. The summit is going to get through. Well, if you're if you're dialing the number that's been given and getting worse. >> All right. So will. Run record for city of Sarasota versus Sunbelt investors, Asset Company LLC, case number 2025, 0, 0, 7, 1, 6, We have called Shannon Finley at 239-849-7862. But that were not receiving able to get through with that line. So that's the number that's given on the application. I'm assuming so at this point, I guess go ahead and proceed with the case. But with the seated position on this from the suspense. >> They are cells. That seems like in our note, we're this at the same issue last times, we may need to get a different. No phone number from his family so that we can actually get her presence in this process. Just But this is a continue case for 2 violations of city Code Section 16 as 47 the commission, provision trash as well as 16 dash. 49 be dense rank overgrowth. >> On a develop, a lot. >> We are seeing some good progress on roads are still some patches behind the fence there on the right hand side as well as you can see on the screen, there is some tree debris still remains as those logs have been cut up and remain there for quite some time. Looking up, right, pushes out another 2 weeks see if we can get, you know, some progress as well as get in touch with family to We need to, you know, good phone number that we can connect you with the hearings. It is no running fine on this one. I not believe so. No. Your asked me to do that. This know. >> We are looking at. October, 30th. At 10, 30. All right. into the case after 10/30/2025 at 10:30AM, and violations continue of 16. 47. >> 15. 49 be of the city code. >> I will go on record for city Sarasota versus 15, 40 Benjamin Franklin LLC. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 6, 3, For the record. No one's here on behalf of the wrist Wandavision Franklin L C. So whats the city's position on this case. >> Theres This is a new case for violation of city code. Section 16 deaths. 47 accumulation of Joan Rivers and trash. There is some trash debris that we received some complaints about after the hurricanes took place. This is the Sandcastle please report that the as of our inspection on 9.19, the properties in compliance. >> Okay. find 60. 47 of the city code was brought into compliance and 9/19/2025 picks because the issue of fines and cost city have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do. we do to repair of inspector with a potential fine of $7,400. With respect to 3.90. But you know, ownership group became where situation of what was exactly needed as a demo, the you know, personal. We're only looking for a finding of violation. >> All right. That's very good. Although accept that recommendation on pose, no find no costs, the new case and nothing to vacate. So all right. Very good. That things off the record upon the violation was corrected September 19 47. >> All right. We're going to go on record for. City of Sarasota versus Oracle, him. The Elk Company, LLC case number 2025, 0, 0, 0, 6, 5, for the record. Leave a early Allen is present correct sound? You know, you've been here enough to know why we start with the city of certain Mr. Spence come right back him. spent whenever you're ready themselves. This is a unique case for numerous violations of our Florida building code. One of 5.1. >> Permits are required as you We are waiting on some. Excuse me, some inspections to be followed in by from the contractor. We have received those yet, but we do have some progress as we do have a a fire fire on those pass. As of yesterday of 10, 14. So the difference out of when she thinks her contractor can turn those prior provider inspections in we close out this case. Welcome town. >> He's your right. The inspections have passed and then city winds to do another fire inspection. Final building. Final this point, we'll have nothing to do with the open case. >> I will be honest tell you that teens I bought the building bike in 2020. And fire alarm sister was completely that I hire 2 different companies, too. Put it up to service is working. But there I know those call would have trouble should thing. And the guy fire inspectors said I won't be able to give you a part of building final if the throw should doesn't leave that has been their sins. 2020. No idea. No is at 23,000 Square Feet building. It could be anywhere, but are is only that that there's there's no sprinkle as pretty close east anyway. So I just want to know what to do because could entail the guys working their hours too. Figure was terrible issue. Thing. Anything that it was. Is specific to day code violation has being. Rusal. Because of actually get out of this process going to have to complete your inspection process. Get your final. I think that. >> So you're contractor knows what he needs to do >> we are at the hands of somebody trying to figure why the ponding of the fire alarm has a throw. It should trying to figure that out. okay. >> Any idea what the time people figure that out is are no. To be honest. They have tried to the movies in the last 4 years. Many, many times. I knew how close to me over $50,000 so far. >> Hear how but but I will tell you something. Just from the perspective of the person that's sitting here. I believed that Ron Warren today noon at U.S. to be cut. It was hard to rent. And that is spiral I And that was in pain to call the city of 4 code violation that then left she'll $33,000 on rent. I couldn't pursue her because Miley didn't have any person guardianship corrupt the company that was renting. So I couldn't do any of that. Well, Don, doing everything I actually believed that the warning some other things because I didn't find my knowledge was not sufficient know that I needed that permit. All these a spiral has me thanking resolve invasions for over 40,000 donors. Now the contractor doesn't want to do anything because everything was done. And so you charge to pull department like $2500 M this is a headed for everybody that gets in both because there is no money to be made. they're trying to do but is not an urgency to 81, not even that fire alarm people that. I mean, they money toward the building. don't care. Is a matter money. If they if there's not a prophet people foot. In resulting in the cell. Yet I didn't click the different from the lady. cause, the city I invested on result in the shoes. And now one can come in here. But if I don't really have answers for you, I mean, I feel really buy. If this continues. >> Well, it must be an answer that somewhere on the electrical of got answer that, you know. So but well, that discussed when the bring this back. So we went with city's position on that. >> Yeah, that sounds like an everything's done just, you know, minus that one. Things that were the city is looking push us out 30 days to allow both the, you know, the the fire company to, you know, find that trouble shoot as well as the inspections placed in the systems. We need close this case out. >> I think 30 days enough to get figured out. Hopefully pushed out 30 days. All right. It's pushed to bring you back 30 we are looking at November. 20th. And it is 10 45 okay. But when you were 20 of the 10:45AM, for to take your thank you. Thank you. make you some money. Was that was that the gymnastics placed in Yes, yeah, because I took my granddaughter to camp there for that late for yeah. So it's a small world. Thank Thank Thank you. I will go on record for city of Sarasota versus done. Then. >> Why high? Huge. An. Case. Number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 3, 3, And for the record, the respondents are not present today. So where are we today? >> I think cells, this is a new case for a violation of our city code. Section 16 dash. 49 C for evidence or Inc overgrowth on a vacant lot. As you can see 3rd section this week, the property remains out of compliance. We and really had much contact so the specter, it seems like they're trying to get it taken care of. But it's very, very hit or miss with, you know, everything's been taken care So with that said, we do have an F prepared by the inspector with a an initial inspection of June 18 to 2025. notice melt on July. 3rd notice served on July 19th posting compliance at 4 July 23rd with proper money out of compliance. So fine. Currently running from July 24th to October 15th for 84 days. That $100 a day. Bring a civil fine to be $8,400. 3 inspections of 3.90, from answer this index exhibit number one as well the 2, 3 of notices there today sharing. >> admit 1, 2, 3, and based on the affidavit, all and there's continuing violation 16 49 Co impose a civil fine today, too. $8,400 in costs today of 3.90, so $100 per day daily running fund to the violations corrected. Indicate that the respondents are required to attend. And when you want to bring this one back. >> We're looking at a November 6th at 8.30. >> After November, 6 08:30AM. I will go on record perceive Sarasota versus of LLC. case number 2025, 0, 0, 9, 9, 7, for the record. No one's here on behalf of the respondents. So. City's position on this one. >> Themselves, this is a new case for a violation city code. Section 16 Dash 47, the accumulation of a chunk, rubbish and trash. I am pleased to report that as our inspection of September 17th, the property is in compliance remains in compliance. find 16. 47 was quiet since 9/17/2025. >> Thanks to the issue, fines and costs see a recommendation. >> We do your honor. We do have an after Perry by inspector with initial inspection of May 29th of 2025. notice melt on June. 10th notice served on July 7th, be a posting employee was set for July. 12th Properties in compliance and the current the fine ran from July 13, 2 September 16 for 66 days at $100 a day during the civil fine to $6,600 with 3 inspections of 390 answer. That is exhibit number one as well as exhibits 2, 3, for the notice of today's hearing. >> On that 1, 2, 3, asked me impose the fines and costs correct. The affidavit I do oppose and mid 1, 2, 3, based on that, the violation that's also correct on September 17, 16. 47 pose a total 5, $6,600 cost of 3.90. This is a new case, brought nothing to make. A token penalty kicks off the record. >> Moses of in cat kind of daunting. Yes, yes. So this is a Richard Ellis serving as magistrate the city of Sarasota. How are you doing, sir? I'm doing good. So how would you very good? So you want to pronounce your name? Please correctly for the record. Yeah, that's good. That's good event. That is good. And I got to go close. Okay, very good. Alright, sir. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus 402, Dash 4.12, North Washington LLC. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 1, 8, And coming on. Thi is appearing for the record from half of the respondents. So so while we start with the city, Mr, Spence in for the City of Sarasota Today, on the city's position on the case. And then I'll come right back to you. OK? All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you raise. >> The results. This is a new case for violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits require where there interrogations that were done without a permit, which include AC electrical and plumbing as special this week. We're not seeing permits applied for deferred, Mr. Kind of bounty in relation to timeline of when you think get the permit applied for and get everything moving forward. >> All right. So let you respond to Mr. Spence, if you're ready. >> So can to my not We didn't do any of that work and we didn't how to kinda know the exit. The line. And then now they had some So the I want to do the that had that and the man he nabbed laws and the not the roof and the ceiling. I had sitting time to move so that they can be moved nation so that I can see the extensive extent damage But took a line so that they can get to put meat in you know, get the connection that has been because they lost the public connection. So the because he's not the do anything to do the code and didn't do To my knowledge, we didn't do anything that be because just know he did and maybe the tenant might have done something plenty to eat and get information from So basic and the I needed time to, you know, I am going to do everything you asked while in a to do it the palm. they did it a site in the 10 and that keeping the building. If you anything, we don't. I'm gonna make sure that, you know, we get that those inspections on that Bill. I mean, I need that month the time. >> That's not be a problem. don't what is it wise to say feel like that, that there was some work done here? That was as you can as you can see in the photos. I know you're not able to witness easements going on TV and on the phone. But we do see one of the beginning on the exterior of the building had been cut are severed. >> If you may, from the other portion of the pipe. So that would considered some plumbing work that I've been taking place as well. As you mentioned, the drop-down ceiling. It looks like there is some ventilation that we've been removed and damage as well. And, you know, going out with the inspector said, you you say you mentioned that there was some electrical work on wiring done that had been. >> You know, no, there's no waiting they Weddington. And also I was looking for a location to, you know, get the, you know, trust that I had occasion go that impact. And then he said first, you need to be moved. >> seating plan so that you can see what's going on. But we know where even a really enough to collect. But I decided to give me a month. I didn't talk about any night. I do not pay for 5 deaths in is what the end of next try to find a general contractor who could pick it Everything and then out it's not occupied. And I didn't do anything up to to get doubled up and give me violation even before. Actually, I like you don't except, you know, just kicking extent damage so that you can see he come up with. committee can do whatever in the city to be But any other violation, if you have I'm happy doing just you know, make sure inspections have done before to be >> All right. have with the comfortable with maybe a 45 Continuance on part that would be more than enough ahead and do that. >> That will put to November. 20th that works for you, Mr. thank And as 11, 15 work out for Yeah, that's that's what's great. Do I need to come? can send presented about it. >> For that you can appear by phone again, if you'd like to Okay, that's great. OK, I do that? Then I see I would love to come. The >> You certainly invited to come. He like so. >> I will find that that, you know, based on the pictures and the description here I'm looking at you're not here. So looking that often there is a violation, one of 5.1. But again, on I'm not going pose any fines or any today. I'm just gonna continue the case out to 11:15AM, on November. 20th and give you an opportunity certain try to, you know, try get a permit and address these issues. All right. Thank you. Thank you for appearing today. We'll talk to on the 20th. Okay. >> Thank. Thank you. Thank you very much. Appreciate. >> I will go next to the City of Sarasota versus half. What half Finance Inc Boucher Holdings, LLC case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 3, 3 won it for the record. Your name again, please. >> Buffy Stacker ask E Okay. You might spell the last thing for me. St may see age or O W K I. Very good. Thank you. >> All right. rescue. I always start with the city of Sarasota, Mr. Spence in for the city today. Come right back to you Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, I sell us. This is a new case for a violation of our city Code. Section 16 Dash 47. >> The accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. As you can see, it appeared to be like a move out at the property. But I'm pleased report that as of our inspection of October 6th, the properties in compliance or means implants. Okay, Miss Decorous going to get your response to Mr. Spencer's comments here. >> they're renters. And this house and the neighboring we also. rent out. And there have been occasions during and move out that there's been. We've contacted the residents. They've always very helpful in getting things. >> moved agree with his get off and that it was a violation. 64, somebody was corrected 10/6/2025 with the cities inspections. So that takes us to the issue of fines and costs. So you have a position on that issue. >> We do your honor. We have a potential civil fine that occurred had accrued from July 13 to 2025 to October 5th for 85 days at $100 a day bringing the potential civil fine of $8,500 or 3 inspections of 390. We're not gonna be asking to see any of that fine will would like to cook the city's cost of $390 of the taxpayers and brother burden. >> Okay. and you understand his recommendation to me on this idea. That's very fair. Okay. Well, go with that. I think sounds reasonable to me as well and posed no fine. Just a cost of 3.90, for the process and pick us off the record. Thank you for take care of it. Thank you. Thank you. All right. We're going next. The city of Sarasota versus Srq Holdings Company LLC, case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 8, 4, And for the record, no one's here on behalf of the responded. So sees position on this case. >> Themselves, this is is a new case for to city code violations for something 16 Dash. 47 the commission jump rubbish and trash as well as 16 deaths. 49 see for evidence over oath on a vacant lot. Both remain out of compliance inspection this week. It's been kind of on and off some other cases event today. as of our time day, that's both out of compliance. All right. Some of >> Well, we'll find 16. 47 60, 40 nights here. Continuing violations in South City have a position on this. The terms of the remedies. >> given up. They would like We've had pair of an inspector. There were like enter in with an initial inspection of 6/13/2025. notice melt on June. 20th. served on June. 30th be a certified now compliant set for July. 1st, earnings out of compliance with find currently running from July. 2nd, 2, October 14, 1 $100 a day. >> Bring a civil fine to be $10,500 with 3 inspections of 3.90, from may answer that in his exhibit. Number one, as as it's 2, 3, for the notices of today's hearing. >> All right. admit 1, 2, 3, find violations continue as I indicate 16. 47 49 see the city code on pose a civil fine today to $10,500 in cost today to 3.90, star $100 per day daily running fund to the violations are corrected. Representative must appear at the next hearing and is available for us. >> We are looking at. November 6th 10:00AM continued after November 6. will take us off the record. We're going to next to City of Sarasota versus Bobby of McGee. case number 2025, 0, 0, 7, 9, 7, And for the record, no one's here on behalf of Bobby McGee. So with city's position. >> are things This is a new case for numerous violations. >> Person being 16 s 49 be dense. Rank overgrowth, an undeveloped property next mean 16 dash. 47 accumulation of Jean Chretien trash. 31 being 16 dash 50 and offer boron unlicensed vehicle on the property. >> Force one being a section 7 dash 3, 1, 3, 4, landscaping, abutting the city right of way as well as sidewalks and roadways and the final and being center housing code through a 3005.1 which pertains to a roof that's in disrepair of violations remain out of compliance. As of today and so in that someone to be a tendency to give us a rough time, rough time frame of when things would be moving forward. But with that said, I do have an affidavit prepared by the inspector. With a a initial set of missions faction of April 18th of 2025. Notice Melt on Me or Yummy. Second, no served on June 9th. Be a posting complaints set for June 19 through the property mean out of compliance and a civil fine currently running problem. June 20th, 2 October 14th for 117 days, $100 a day, bring a civil fine to be $11,700 for 3 inspections of answer that in exhibit number one as well as exhibit number 2 for notices of today's hearing. >> All right. one, too. And maybe 3 as well that I know 3, just 2, 1, 2, and based on the affidavit all imposes civil fine to date of $11,700 in cost today of 3. Nice $100 daily running final indicate the wrist. Bobby McGee is required attend the next hearing. And what, sir, available here. >> We are looking at. It's to November. 20th at one 15. 2 November 20th at one 15 PM. >> I want to go on record for city of Sarasota verse with Bride is case number 2025, 0, 0, 1, 3, 2, For the record. No one's here behalf of with me. But I would advise not present so city's position on this case, their cells. This is a case we had a 32 correct. previous hearings. >> One had another chance to go out there. Yes, are probably look into one retain authority to correct as well as just kick this out about 2 weeks. All right. That's what's available online. we are looking at. October, 30th. Look at one. 45? All right. to KSAT October. THIRTY-ONE 45 PM a fund the violations, the $0.40 49 be are continuing. >> City of Sarasota's continued to is authorized to correct the violations. I guess there's no point, but I would say would-be brides required to attend. >> Okay. We'll go will call the U.S.. this a Michael Clemons? >> Yeah, you got Markham Richard all serving as magistrate the City of Sarasota this morning. How are you doing? >> Doing well. What's Well, we're going a record for your case if you're ready to go. Yeah, go ahead. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus Michael R Clemens is trust either Clinton. I can understand. We do talk All right. We're going to go on record for your case, Mr. Clements, this is City of Sarasota versus Michael R Clemens as trustee of the route the Clemens family revoked will trust agreement dated 7/17/2013 Jane, a Clemens as trustee. The Clements Family Revoke will trust agreement dated July 17th 2013. This is case number 2025 0, 0, 3, 5, 5, Mr. Clements perceived procedurally. I we start with the City of Sarasota, Mr. Spence's in for the city this morning. He's going to go ahead and present the city of Sarasota's a position on this case. And then I'll return to you, OK? >> Still don't understand what's going on here. we call that contractor and said that the place passed inspection. >> Mr. Clements haven't gotten it. We're going to give Mister Spence a chance to explain the city's position on the case and then I'll come back to you, OK? >> I can. I can understand you. You you sound like you're in. That goal came about. All right, Mr. Clements, can understand me better now? >> I'm somewhat, but I still can't understand you. >> Okay, Mister Clemens where you reside. You live where you live up in New Hampshire. All right. going to give this another shot of Mister Clemens. I'm gonna start with Mr. Spence and he's gonna explain the city's position on this. OK, hopefully a bill to hear him better. I Spence, whatever your race or >> thank you, Mr. Ellis, this is a continued case we had for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits require where there was some carper renovations that were done without a permit. I am pleased to report that as of the building final on 10, 3, the property is now in compliance. All Well, thank you very much. Does or anything else I have to now. >> Mr. Cummins, we're gonna take up the issues of fines and cost. And so I will. We'll go to that next. So Mr. Mr. Spence, the city have a recommendation on the issue of fines and costs. >> Yes, your honor. We have a affidavit prepared by the inspector with a potential civil fine that accrued from April 9th to October 2nd for 177 days at $100 a day, bringing the potential so fine to be $17,700 with 6 inspections of 615. The city is knocking requesting any of that civil fine. But we would like to recoup our initial cost of $390 of the tax burden. Bear the whole burden for this process. You know, after the 6.15, year after 3.90, and costs correct? All right, Mr. Clement, did you understand Mr. Spence's recommendation to me. >> So you want me to send you a check $390. >> Mr. Spence is recommending that I impose cost only there's a potential fine of $17,700, but the city is not recommending that they're recommending that I oppose no fine. Just assessed part of the costs for the process of 3.90, I want to get your Mr. Clements. >> Okay. but guy who I make the check out to win. Why shouldn't >> All right. sounds like a reasonable go with the 3.90 and cost no fine. This clemency going to send you. We have Mister Clemens is e-mail address. They're going to send you a copy of my order here today. And that's gonna get us into instructions on how to make the payment on okay. >> OK, would you send it by mail? Please snow. They'll they'll send it by snail mail and humility open do it both ways. Okay. >> Okay. So everything should be fine as soon as I bay. That site on mount, right? Yes, you're in good shapes or take care. Thank you. Thank you. Have a good day. >> We're gonna go on record for city of Sarasota versus 32. 20 south tamiami LLC, case number 2025, 0, 0, 7, 2, 9, and for the record, no one's here on behalf of the respondent. 32 20 south tamiami LLC. So it's the city's position on this case. Things are. this is a new case for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits required. >> Where there's interior renovations that were done without a permit. I am pleased to report that have a permit issued and completed as of October 13th. >> All right. I'll find a violation 105, 0.1 was correct. October, 13th 2025 taking us to the issue, fines and costs city have a recommendation on that issue. >> We honor. We have a potential. So find that accrued from 5/12/2025. To October. 12th for 100 of the 4 days at $100 a day, bringing the chance of a fiery $15,400 with 3 inspections of 3.90, cities. Not gonna be asking for all that. We were only requesting a one day $100 as well as the city's cost of 3.90. accept that recommendation. All imposes civil fine of $100 in costs of 3.90. I think this is a new case. Nothing to vacate. >> And so that'll take us off the record. Thank you. All right. We're going to go on record City of Sarasota versus NXT Acquisitions Corporation 2025, 0, 0, 5, 8, 9, is our case. Number. And for the record, are you Taylor Wilson Mr. Wilson you were here before kind of know the procedure. I always start with the city and that come right back Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir, there are cells. This as you do you case for numerous housing code violations as well as >> I violations? 16 Dash 4, 7 accumulations, junk Roberson trash. And finally zoning code. Section 6 Dash 102 J one for boater, recreational vehicle and the front yard Please report that the that code was corrected on 10, 14, but all the other violations still remain out of compliance and has to defer to Mister Wilson of a timeframe when he thinks he can get everything corrected as we're not really seeing and he permits in our system. All right, Mr. Wilson, let me get your response. If I could. >> Yeah, these were supposed to get filed late last week. think I made some changes that we're waiting on engineer stamp for. >> But >> either way, it's coming right around the corner. I know we push right up to the south. That's yeah. we push this out, what was a city recommened 30 days? 45 just doesn't always mean the closure. source and get the permit process start and hopefully issued and then move forward from there work for you, sir, are worse, OK? Let's find mutually convenient time and date. I don't push us to right around December 4th. That works you. It works. And mornings or afternoons better morning. Woody 45 workout? >> Can we do it around this time? Which Yeah, we've got 11 available >> Our list to that would go into the case December 4th at 11:00AM Fun. 6, 1, J. One of the zoning code think it's now corrected remaining. But violations cited are all continuing at this point. And so we will see that hope all, you know, just get got to get the permitting. Permit issued and we'll go from there. It to take care. Thank Thank you. All right. We're going to go on record for City of Sarasota versus John Robert Years. Case number 2025, 0 4, 1, 4, one, too. And for the record, no one's here on behalf of the respondents. So. position on this case. >> I think we're is this is a new case for a violation of our city code. Section 16 dash. 49 be for heavy, dense rank, overgrowth, underdeveloped lot. And please report those are inspections on October 4th, the properties in compliance or remains in compliance. All right. find that 60 49 be has been brought into compliance on 10/4/2025. >> Get tickets. The issue, fines and cost cities. The recommendation on that. >> I sure it seem sure the game building in the Sting Carolina potential find that accrued from September 17th 2 October 3rd for 17 days, $100 a day. Bring the potential find to be $1700 or 3 inspections of 390 cities. Only recommending $100 fine as well as 3.90, in costs. >> All right. All except that I'll go with a fine of $100 cost of 3.90. Violations corrected pick us off the record. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus Karen. She a while with his trusty of the Family Trust created under Article 8 of the Burton. Well, Vocal Trust agreement dated 8/27/2009. got teased by the CLC. This is case number 2025, 0, 0, 0, 8, 0 and up for the record, you you your name and who you represent. >> I'm Scott Allen and Jennifer Allen. And we represent few days by the Sea. Very good engine you, Jennifer at around. Very good. Okay. Thank you. All right. Procedure we start with a city with Mr. Spence's University today. I'll come right back to you after along the city's position on this. >> Whatever your race themselves, this is a continue case you had for violation of our Florida building code. >> 105, 0.1 person required. As you can see, there are some dry want. >> Place due to the extensive hurricane damages from October and September. >> I am pleased to report that they have the permit issued early part of September and they add the building final past on September, 30th in the properties. Noncompliance. >> We go an agreement with that and I will on 1, 0, 5, 1, of the Florida building code was complied with brought into compliance and September. 30th 2025 which immediately takes the issue of fines and cost the city have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do your honor. We haven't actually prepared by the inspector with a potential. find that accrued from a December 30 for the first of 2024 to September. 29th of 25 for 273 days. 100 $1 a day join the potential fine to be $27,300 with for inspections of 4.65. This is not going. You're recommending either fines or costs due to extensive nature of the hurricanes that took place in the damages that take out on on circle. But we would like to just, you mentioned repeat violator provision. >> OK, well, you can't really do much better than that recommendation. So all are going accept it and impose no fine and no cost of Mr. Spence's alluding to city as a repeat but violator provision. If you finally the same provision, same respondent, same violation within 5 years of fines can run 500 plus today. But for today's purposes, no final cost. Thank you for coming. No Hugo. There you go. Hopefully not. Yeah. This year's that support so far we've been lucky Thank Thank Thank you for many years. I Thank you. >> High if you record your name and reason for calling. I'll see if this person is available. >> Josh Spence, City of Sarasota. >> Thanks, Josh. With Ben. Please stay on the line. ? ? >> Those say you Gene Cossey. Yes, see, this is Richard Ellis serving as magistrate of the City of Sarasota. How are you doing today, sir? Good. How are you? If you're ready, we'll go on record for city of Sarasota versus Igor. Well, Don Ski and a new go. That's key is case. Number 2025, 0, 0, 1, 5, 8, >> And I believe we have is that Elaine and killed build ask is Present with us, OK? And Mr. Cost the school desk is here in our hearing room just to let you know that and procedurally. What we'll do is we'll start with Mister Spence for City of Sarasota on the city's position on this. And then return to The problem is could cost and then we'll go to But go ahead, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> Themselves, this is A continues. We had for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits required were there was a carport that was renovated into, you know, living in ends enclosure. I am pleased to report that we do have a final inspection. Those past back on September 30th. There are 9.30, and the properties noncompliance. >> All Marcus, you want go to you next. Are you heard Mr. Spence's remarks. He indicate there was a violation of 105, one of the Florida building code. But with their inspection on September, 30th, they find it is it has corrected. So let me let me get your response that. >> Yeah, I just wanted to say I appreciate everybody's patience with getting this project to completion. We have done everything we could to speed up. The process obviously takes a little bit of time from the engineering perspective and also getting everything you all the people a necessary for the building department. But, you as as you may know, this wasn't something is go down. did. It was something that previous on that. So we have to get it back to compliance. it you know, something we have to do after the fact. >> All right, sir, thank you. This you anything to this. Thank you. Okay. All right. Very good. All right, Mr. Spence said I will find a violation of one of 5.1 was corrected on 9/30/2025 and that takes us to the issue, fines and costs the city have a recommendation on that Yes or We do have a final of David prepared by the Inspectorate with a potential civil fine that had accrued from January 27th of 2025. >> To September 29th of 25 for 246 days at $100 a day, bringing the potential civil fine to be $24,600 with 7 inspections of 690. The city is not going requesting a any of that. So we'll to they go dance keys, you know, purchasing into that property. But just let the time, you know, intact for just want to read the pardon for this process where we will be asking for 6.90, of the costs. All I guess I'll go to you, Mr. Casi the city and there's a potential final. $24,600 city is recommending. >> No fine with that. ISIS costs for the process here of 6 90's. So I'll let you seem to be the spokesperson story. I'm trying understand the number at $690, correct? Yes. >> city no fine. Attention to potential finest. $24,600. The city is recommending that I imposed no fine, but the asking me to pose costs for the process of the taxpayer doesn't bear the burden that 6.90. >> Okay. I just want to make is go down, given where that, you know, there is a cost to this. you we we didn't we didn't anticipate that it would be that high. But I guess, you know, we We'll have to comply. >> obviously they're doing squats with with hearings and everything. I understand completely. It's going anything you want to add them now. Okay. >> Are not going cost us 6.19. 0, fine. Anything to bake it in this case and Iran not. All right. We'll have a devout takes off the record. Good luck. Thank you. >> Thank Thank you so much. You have advice for thank you for call participating. Take care. Thank you. bye. >> By both here. Ryan. >> If >> Those are Ryan was Ryan >> yes, this this is a Richard Ellis serving as magistrate the city of Sarasota. How are you, sir? Good. You want call your ideas. Your brother, Nicholas, hold as well. >> sorry. I couldn't area you want call Nicholas as well. >> Are you are you handling this to >> If okay, I I got to >> Okay. All right. Very good. Alright, we will go on record then. This is the City of Sarasota vs Mark Holden. It's case number 2024, 0, 0, 3, 7, 5, So Mr. Hold off, start with Mr. Spence for the City. And I'll come right back to you. OK? Okay. Thank you. All right, Mr. Spence win everywhere. >> Time sell us. This is continue case we have for a couple violations of our Florida building code 5, 1, in previous hearings we spoke with an Mr. Holden saying that he is looking to renovate the carport, but are the enclosed carport back to a regular car port? We do see that there is a permit applied for as of September. 11th, but it's still sitting pending submission status right now. So to have to see what MRI notice to fields, where he where we stand on, get everything up properly applied for and have everything moving forward so they can be reviewed as well as the workplace. >> Okay. Mister Holder, where do you think you are with the permit process? >> My of my brother and my sister both working getting the permits. We are in process of. we're just trying to figure out exactly what is being required because the village. The advantage in years that we have been speaking with the building department are saying that they believe. my dad put up 2 walls. And that and close in the carport as well get some electrical plumbing and stuff like that. We do understand that we're supposed to remove the electrical plumbing in camp all that stuff But we're just kind of in the back and forth with. We. We think I I we just think that. That that the house actually that my father only enclosed front wall of the home. We believe that the house was built with that sidewalk with a look. Structure just confused as if we are actually supposed remove that. it look for structural wall and it just doesn't look like something that my dad put in there. If we understand that that the front wall. He did, he did add that wall as well. And he added an interior wall, too, make a part of the room or closet. So we're just thinking that we could remove, you know, that interior was the the front wall that opens up the carport, cap off all the electrical plumbing. But having was thinking, have a Magnus was he thinks that the side wall. Well, addition as well. So also on top of it to it. You know, I'm not make excuses about where we're all from Illinois and would all right. run my own business here as well my brother does the same. we both have I have 4 kids, my brother 3 kids of my sister was she was working on first. But she she is very unhealthy. And she was she was born with a very serious heart condition. And has had multiple heart transplant start her life once at birth. And just recently, once you're 25 and she really not in the back back health right now. She is currently very, very low on white blood cell. So word we're just trying send. We're still dealing with a lot of my dad staff that's going on up here in Illinois at a pretty large estate. And I understand that you guys have been not during what flag kind of a long time ago. and I honestly I'm really sorry about like all the delays, but there's been so much going on. We're just trying to figure out exactly what needs to be done with the house and we can pull the correct permits we're at the point where we're now just considering hiring a contractor just the kind of make this all easier because I know my brother was even thinking of going down there to do the work themselves. everything's kind just second issue right now with But the distance, you know, like my brother at the hall as toward on there, which she was going to do while ago. But I know we're kind of going back and forth on what exactly needs to be without it. There. The enclosure. My sister and my this week are supposed be reaching out to Kevin again to figure out exactly what needs to be done than the electric and the plumbing. We understand that that has to be removed because that was installed incorrectly had against college. So we're going remove all the electrical plumbing and cap that off correctly. And then we're just we're trying to figure out what to do with the structure of the home that in the side wall. >> OK, Mr. Spence, any questions. >> Not start. knows no questions. >> Obviously it's ultimately up to Mr. Holder what they decide hold as what they want to move forward. You know, being from out of state, sometimes it is easier to place a contractor, you know, and that process interact with the plan's examiner. You know, it says speak with Mr. Magnus, which that's one of the first things I would do. It's with them, you know, trying to get like a phone conference and say what exactly you needing, you know, get that information. And if you want to decide, you know, you know, doing a homeowner permit. That's awesome for you guys. Or if you guys want to move the contractor allowed them to just no deal with that process. You know, that's ultimately your decision. You know, sometimes it's just easier when living out of state But with that said, we're probably looking you a drink, obviously due to extenuating circumstances and the like this to case, we're probably looking to push us out around 60 days to and work through that process. I will say this has been going on as it is a 2024 case. You and we and certain affidavit and next hearing. So I just want make that on the record. >> Over push it forward one way or the other, if you guys would Mr. Holder but all right. Let's find a day 2 months out. Push us to December 18th. There were Mr. Holder. >> absolutely. And that that will give us plenty of time, too tough to guard don't need to be done, sir. To be able to execute a plan. And I and I told him stand that that this has been going on for a while and and I'll be start about all that. >> What time of day December 18th is a river mornings or afternoons. Mornings are okay. >> You want to do 09:00AM. >> And this continue the case out to December 18th at 09:00AM. It's always a Thursday. violations continuing is cited, Mr Hole to stay with this and try to, you know, try to figure that one where the other, if you would, sir. there are certainly when you have a good day, take care. >> Thank you very much. Appreciate >> All right. We're going to go on record for a city of Sarasota purses. Neil Stubbs is case number the 2024, 0, 0, 9, 0, 3, and Sanders. Correct? >> Yes, it so innocent afternoon and here on behalf of Mister Staab. Was also present. As you know, I always start of the city and I'll come right back Texas. Whatever your rights are. I think is this is a continue case. We have 4 to city violations which were both corrected. And then our final on remaining was a center housing Co 305 3.1. >> And please report, after speaking us and reasonably we have a closing date as of yesterday, 10, 15 and the city would consider it corrected as of that standards. You agree with that. >> are in the process final money transfer. So it's either going to be completely finalized today. As of today. >> As far as that comes correction date of in 50. You're comfortable that yes, this will begin demolition. I'll go ahead find 3 of 3005.1 was corrected 10/15/2025 and previously found the other violations. It compliance. So we're ready to go to the issue, fines and costs. All right. Let's go, Stu, that with the city's recommendation on that. >> I think your honor, we do have an affidavit. It's going to very prepared by the inspector with a so a potential find that a crew from July 19th of 2024. 2 October 14 to 2025 for 453 days at $100 to date on the potential civil fine $45,300 with a of some 65. And speaking with Ms Andrews, the new virus going to be doing a demo. The properties of the city's not be asking for that that whole fight amount. We would like to see a $3,000 fine as you know, did take quite some time as well could the city's cost $765 65 in costs. And the final 3,000 the recommendation? Yes, Sanders, I want to get your response if you if you're ready to respond on recommendation. >> Yeah, willing to accept those fines costs. We're incorporating it into the sale of the property. Yes. >> All right. Let's go with that at all. I have a thing to bake it this case. I know you are okay. >> So so the the is that he'll find 3,000 with a total cost 65 65 in costs will be imposed $3,000 fine. Nothing to vacate violations are corrected. Some. Thank you very much. Thank Thank you. Thank you. Thank Thank you. All right. We're going to go on record for a city of Sarasota versus Camila of W Nowak case number 2025, 0, 0, The 2 final identify yourself for the record. Pronounce your name properly. Millan, a lack those captain, Noah always always start with the city Mr. Spence in today outline the city's position on this. And come right back, right? Because Mr. Spence, whatever your race or. >> I think us this was a continued we had for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits require where there was an officer converted into a dwelling unit. I'm pleased report that as of our building final as of 9.30, the properties in compliance remains in compliance. I'm gonna guess you're in Yes. >> And I will find a violation. 105, 0.1 was correct. On 9/30/2025. So we go to the issue of fines and costs. >> And Mr. Spence, the city of a recommendation on that issue. We get your honor. We have a potential civil fine. The crude from April 6, the 25 to September 29th for 177 days at $100 a day, bring the potential find the $17,700 with 5 inspections of 540. The city is not going to asking for any of that civil fine, but we would like to recoup the city's cost of 540's. That expert is where the burn this process. All right. Mister, like did you understand his record? Yes, no fine. But Costa, 5.40. >> Thank you. Good with Yes, it's reasonable to me is yes, it is ago that I not impose a fine sense cost of 5.40. And nothing to make it in. This one think okay. Well, I think Kerry have a good day thank you. was even if you're going to get you go up know, get your copy of you OK, thank you. All right. We're going we're going on record next for city of Sarasota versus Project one side incorporated. >> case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 4, 1, And for the record, sir, your name again, please. The fact that out. All right, Mister Patel, a procedure we start with the Start with Mr. Spence now come right back to get your response to think you're most welcome. All right, Mr. Spence, whatever Eraser. >> I think shows this is a new case for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits required. >> Where there had been a fence that was installed without a permit and please report them as pull the permit and as it closed out as of September 4th. Okay. All right, Mr. Patel the Get your response to Mister Spence. >> I've just moved from England to you. I just bought this property and I think fence outside so people can see through my house. >> So go to a local builder to come and give me a price to do the fence. So I asked him, do we need And he says no. I mean, I I didn't know. So anyway, not to know to some extent that I didn't take the permanent. So I'm going to do the job. And you opened a permit and then disappeared on me. He didn't ever finished a permit. can't chase a name. Didn't happen. I kept coming back. I can for the office say what can I do? So then a young lady said when you can open a permit yourself. You could look at the building to sign it off to kind apartment. changed it. Disappears any by found him and brought him here. He signed the paper. somebody else to do the permit. >> All right. Well, the season, okay. You're in compliance is of September 4th. They agree with that decision are long gone ago with at all violation was corrected on 9/4/2025. And that also takes us to the issue, fines and cost the city have a recommendation on this particular case. >> are we have a a after for an inspector with a partisan fanatic route from July. Second to September 3rd, for 64 days at $100 a day, bring this potential. Finally $6,400 or 3 inspections of 3.90, speaking of the inspector. And here tell,