POLISCOPE

The public record

SARASOTA (SARASOTA COUNTY) · LOCALHeld · official record pendingPartial coverage

Code Compliance Hearings

Thursday, November 6, 2025 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Record incomplete

Code Compliance Hearings

Why it matters

This page inventories the meeting agenda; the available analyses do not establish a headline decision.

What happens next

The scheduled meeting date has passed. Minutes or an action agenda are not published in the records we hold.

This meeting date has passed and no official outcome record has been published yet. Nothing on this page is a decision.

Captured actions

36

Recorded outcomes

0

Source artifacts

2

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Sep 20, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

This source published text without speaker turns, so speakers and timestamps are not shown.

The opening of 108,085 stored characters

>> All right. We're going to go on record for that. code compliance. Special magistrate hearings. Today's date is 11/6/2025 first case on the docket city of Sarasota. First, Gary Easterling case number 2025, 0, 0, 9, 9, 9, The record know it's here for during the Sterling. Various really is not present. So start with the city and Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir. >> There are cells. This is a continued case we have for violation of our Florida building code 5.1 permits required where there's interior work that have been done, please. We do have some good progress being made at a gas ref in those past on 10. 22 and they should gas final that is scheduled for today. So probably going to push us out a couple weeks. Tell on complete the inspections. Our lives. So what's available for us? With holidays? Coming up? Let's do December 4th at one. 45? All right. continue out to December. >> For one 45 pm. Find a violation continuing confirm the water takes off the record. >> this a donde in? You hear me, sir. don't do it. Yes, yes, sir. This is Richard Ellis serving as magistrate of the City of Sarasota. How are you this morning, sir? Or can you hear me understanding? All right. So some of you can understand me. I'm going to start with the city of Sarasota's of for the record. This case is City of Sarasota versus done then pie and I don't know. Newton and it's case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 3, 3, and Mr. De I always start with the City of Sarasota saw start with Mr. Spence Hope you hear hear him understand him and then I'll come go back to you and get your response. Okay. All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> I think selves. This is a continue case. We had for a violation of our city code section 16 dash. 49 C for heavy dense rank overgrowth on a vacant lot. I'm pleased report that is our inspection on November. 3rd, the property is now in compliance. >> All right. Mister Dan, Mr. Spence's saying the properties in compliance it as a very special on November. 3rd, I'm guessing you're in agreement with that. >> Yes, but I did my guide game. unknown them on way before that. I also speak to Adam the inspectors which came on the July of 19. >> All right. So are you saying it was taking care of and July of 19 and you called in to the to the city with been completed. >> And then just update that you want to reject This week's. Up the case following up to up to date. >> OK, so that was just say, let's see. I'm looking at. All right. Well, let's let's look. That may be consistent with the pictures of the scene. This Java. We have a July 17th. Picture picture. looks. It's not. It's at that point. The grass is still up. So you know, so. Anyway? Well, I think it for the record that I will find November 3rd, is that correction date? You know, the process for future references, you know, ever that's completed. You called in. They confirm with you that completed. So anyway. So we go to the issue, fines and costs, Mr. Spence, the city have a recommendation on Yes, are we don't have to. >> From a prior hearing you had entered in 4 >> and assessed. Find that you did for $8,400 with 3 inspections of 3.90, it seems that Mr. Uddin was billion that cares a ruling to be asking for $500 fine and the costs of 3.90. All Mr. Did you understand Mr? Spence's recommendation. >> But that Corning, to talk when I talked to inspect, though he came out July 19, I did think at the end of the day on July 19 and I also received also in the the court ordered that the service was done by on the July 19 on here. >> Alright And in this case that asking only for the $500 fine. So this thing was originally service it back in June of this year. So I think that's it. The potential fines, $8,400, the city is recommending only a $500 fine. I'm gonna go with that. just cost of 3.90, joining of a Kate. The prior order you to bake hate the prior order that at the larger fine. That's going to close it out. Just just a warning to you, Mr. Dan, the there's a repeat violator provision in the city code. If the same responded is cited for the same thing within 5 years of fines can run $500 a day. So be careful going forward. I hopefully have a service now that's going stay on top of But this will close out the case today and obey Kate. The previous order that established a larger fine and we'll wrap it up here today. You've got a copy of order in the in the by email in also also have have a link in it as to how how to pay it. Okay. All right, sir. Have a good day. Take here. Thank you. We're going record next for city of Sarasota versus Markelle Musser. And Thelma sir. case number 2025 0, 0, 4, 8, 8, answer for the record date. Your name again, please. Rubin Fisher. been fissures here. Mr. Fischer, I know you've been here for a number of people say, you know the process here. I always start with the city of start with Mr. Spence. And soon as sense as for fish to come right back to pencil eraser, us this is a continued his. We had 4, 3, violations. A person being Florida building code 5, one permits for fired. >> And that's in relation to to do you know, it's our install without a permit or secondary doing this. All that permit because Section 6 DASH 2, a to B or use of the property as there's 2 dwelling units and the final thing, 7 dash 602 CC 2.1 C wishing pertains to to doing with neither one being owner of fight on each side. We haven't seen any corrections that were sent out back in June since then. So the different Mr. Fisher when he thinks can get some corrections turned in that we get the permit process moving forward. OK, Mr. Fish. Yesterday at printed off the signed and sealed. Plans. Finally. And I got. This week, I want to. Submit to the city the transmittal for that. And the other list that the city had gave me too. Who's sending as a print transmittal? I'm sure there's a few things, but I got that all together. just this week sometime I want to I want to submit to the city what they requested and then whatever it takes. When they come in to permit them a call for inspection. >> Questions, Mr. just the one question of like a timeframe of when fish are things that once obviously it's contingent on in the permit issued. But when you think can be, you know, everything turned in for a proper review as well as the inspections to be called in to close out the permit. They answer. The first question was you're going turn it in this week for the. >> The permit, correct? Right. But on next to the next question is how long what's the permits issue was? How long the process going to take that? >> As soon I get the permit as soon as the city players, everything that I hand in. Hopefully I don't have to, you know, hopefully everything will be OK. Call for a permanent. I'll call for inspection like, you know, within a couple days from that release, according to, you know, get a fight to get a final. How long did yesterday it's going to take what you get the permit. 2 that fast. shouldn't take me that long. But I'm giving myself some time. You know that's get the permit cleared. understood. So alright, that answer your question, Mr. Spence slightly. My only concern is. >> we >> have cited for 2 dwelling means enough for a kitchen and stuff so that it seems like there would be have to be some work that would take place to return. It. You know, as to one hole unit unless one of the owners is going to be residing within one of those you that atu side or accessory dwelling unit or the main living structure. So that feel like there could be some further work needed. So it just, you know, not saying because you couldn't get it done in 2 weeks past pending permit issues, just a feeling of the kind a tight, tight window. >> So I wasn't quite aware of what he was saying. If if there's more work than yes, there's will need more time if that if that comes back to me. Well, in terms of bringing this back, so, you know, we had the first the threshold of getting the want, information to the >> department. You want to bring this back in 30 days? 45 60? Probably 60 due to the okay. So comfortable as but the holidays, etc. I will bring this case back in 60 day. So what's available and to the new Year? >> Also would like to make it known, Mr. Fisher for the case, we do have it running into 50 a day. So they need to be done it is of the time is of the essence in this. And what he says is saying so. >> We're looking at January 8th, the worst times for sure. And what you want to knock out. First thing he 30. That be fine. All right. That's all they'll come to the case up to January 2026. At 08:30AM, find a violation of 105, of Florida building code. >> So could sections 6 to a to B and 6 6. 7, 6, 0, 2, CC 2.1 C. this can otherwise confirm the order that does leave the fine running is, you know, I can revisit those things. If things are prosecuted. Well, so OK, but they have a good day, sir. Take care. Thank you. The next the city of Sarasota versus tool for North Adams LLC. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 6, 2, For the record. Respond is not present. Here. Today representative for the responders not present. So whats the city's position on this case. >> There's also this is a continuing as we have for 3 violations. First one being city code section 16 Dash 47 Commissioner Roche and trash. Next one being 16 dash. 29 see every dense rank overgrowth on a vacant lot and final and being section as any good section. 7 dash, 2, 7, for the use of the property as they are storing building materials on property as well as a construction trailer as are inspections this week probably remains out of compliance for all 3 violations. You know. So that said we would like to increase the daily running fine to $250 a day. >> Right. Modify the prior order, increase the daily and to to 50 per day indicate a representative for the responders required to attend next hearing. What? So when you want to bring this one back? ? >> Let's to December. 11th at 8.30. >> out to December. 11th at 08:30AM. >> This is thing. >> Mr. Gyngell. This is Richard Ellis serving as magistrate the City of Sarasota. How are you, sir? >> Good. Good hair. very good. If you're ready will go on record for your case which is styled city of Sarasota vs. >> Ftf Lending LLC. It's case number 2024 money. let me let me grab my colleague good lead on this. >> Okay. Sure. Thank you. Good morning, Michael. Good morning, sir. This is a rise is telling Mr. Gyngell. This is Richard also serving as magistrate all City of Sarasota. Michael Good morning. I before you and the last time. Hurry. That's right. Yeah, I do very well. Thank you. And I let me back up a little bit. I kind of sped up through that and cup. We'll be through your colleague there off a little bit. But it this is a city of Sarasota versus Ftf Lending LLC case number to 2024 0, 1, 0, 8, 6, >> And so you gentlemen, for the record, I always start with the city as you know, and Mr. Spence's in for the city today. And then I'll come right back to you. OK? >> Eventually, no problem. All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready serve. >> Yes, thank you. this is a continue case we have for 2 violations of our city Code Section 17, 11 which pertain to yard waste. No roof on the property as well as a fence that was in disrepair. I'm pleased to report that is our inspection of 11, 4. >> Property is now in compliance. It all violations corrected now on the property from the city's response as a vote for the inspection 11, 4. >> All right. Mister Clinton, want to respond to Mr. Spam, guess you're in agreement with that? >> know that I agree with the that really appreciate city's patient understanding with obviously had wrinkles with the foreclosure and the change in ownership that are. But obviously it's been a pleasure to work with city. And I appreciate there your patience and understanding as progress in the case have been great to communicate with them. Agree with the update. They've been great with communication and email. We've asked for things and like I both professionally and personally appreciate. >> Their outreach in workmanship throughout the case. >> All right. That's point. I'm sure they appreciate that as well. So that's a point. go to Mister in terms of the issue of fines and costs. And then of course, come back to get your response to that. So Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready on that as before you continue, I asked Palumbo and we've had communications prior. >> But I guess to your plans moving forward, keep the property maintain just to avoid future of violations. >> think they So with that, what I can is I get the following. Future communication. If there would be any type of violations, I would always be at first violation be addressed to the current property owner, which is my client. I D Investment LP. I would requested second to the notice to our office as well so that we have full apprised what's going on. And there is delay in getting noticed as well taking corrective action. But to respond to the question directly, I my client is intending to remain in compliance. They are trying to sell it as we get into two-week had the put your I don't know how quickly it may happen, did for a period offseason. But I know down there is more of a busy season as far as winter. So hopefully they will hold a 2, 2 on same time during their The intent to remain in compliance. But important for me, at least as their counsel. 2. Have noticed in a timely manner. So that if the county can are searching, the can send the notice both to the client and to myself of the council. That would be greatly appreciated and actually provide any address that you may need in order for the notices to go to the correct parties. >> All right. Some Mr. Spence City have a recommendation on this one. >> We do. are. We have day care. are find that had accrued to just over $90,000 due to and the initial part of the case where no one was in attendance. You know, we such fine as well as increase the fine to to 50 a day. As well as inspections. That crew to $990. The city is not gonna be asking for all that fine. We're only going to be asking for $1000 fine due to the length of the time of the process as well as the city's inspections cost 9.90. >> All right. Mr. Plummet. You understand Mr. Spence's recommendation that the potential fine based on the affidavit that you can't see is $90,050 and assess costs for the process. You're 9.90. So he's asking for $1000 fine and costs of 9.90. So want to get your response said if I could. >> I get your honor. I would much mitigation as possible. I would be it but for the foreclosure process that occur just the last few months, my client was not the property owner. It International Group LLC. However, as a response to lender, my client to take practiced steps >> in advance that again, we're not their responsibility that they did in order to bring compliance with He didn't matter here. I guess it would also add that. To find the cause too. I get the the lack of responsibility that Blue International took his property owner throughout the whole pendency, matter except for when the foreclosure sale took place. I would also I as for mitigation, with respect to. In my opinion, I think corrective steps one. Camp Blanding in that Ivy. I Bl Investment LP took the action toward notice of the action. I believe the to take. Fairly timely steps to correct Concerns and tried to be a communique this possible. As far as when the steps would be taken. Cheddar ultimately result better. >> All right. So appreciate that. It do is I will cut the fine the recommended 5 and half to 500. But I am going to assess the costs of 9.90, you know, somebody you early on in this case dropped the ball. You wasn't you when you what you got involved in a everything kind of moved along appropriately. But is looking to link the time of this is 11/8/2024 there were. where year later. So, you know, it's kind of a balancing act. You've been great about trying be responsive on this. I appreciate that. Somebody with a $500 fine cotton i-ninety do have finds to vacate on this Yes, your honor of a kit. The large fines of accrued in the case already. >> that's going to close it out. Mister Palumbo, thank you for participating with this thing. Appreciate it. >> New Promenade, you're on a can. city or court's order from the hearing today and that if he hadn't. It didn't lending because they're getting the mail. But then taking a while for it to get to my client. I D can. I provide the court with that. appropriate address for where the mail order to date email count. How many beacon about an e-mail address going to be more efficient, maybe an email address that to send this to. >> And also send a link as to how to pay it as well. So I see you my e-mail Michael M I T H a E L. >> At in George, Paul Law said that Dolly W then LL the dot com. So Michael, I G P Law LLC dot com and your honor. I would be glad the mail service as opposed to, you know, certified mail or regular mail that define mail service fined for this ordinance with e-mail you the order and the link. And I really appreciate respond. Have a good day, sir. Take care. >> Thank you get in city council. I do appreciate the the cooperation, the all throughout the matter should thank you. >> These day. mentioned thinking about >> All right. The next case on the docket is city of Sarasota versus Bill. Very Jean Blue is to a life estate. Gayle, you Robinson is re major in Gloria J. Madison is remainder Manfred blues, remainder man. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 1, 7, for the record. No one's here on behalf of the respondents. spent go to you with the city's position on this case. >> cells, this is new case for most violations. First city codes. Those are 16 dash. 47 accumulation, Jean Chretien trash. And second one, being 16 dash 50 or an opera unlicensed vehicles. Both those remain out of As of our inspection this week and the remaining are housing code violations first one is through a 3005.1 as well as through 3005.2, which pertain to the roofs of the property in disrepair. There are pertains to the windows. As well as 0, 5, point. 11.1 which pertains to exterior doors and through 5 point number 2 is also exterior doors and then 3 of 5.1 5 which pertains accessory structures. All of those remain out of compliance this week. We're not seeing any permits for that for any sort of demolition or any sort of repairs on the property. >> that's on the attendance to speak up on no timeline of when they think being in a demo and or maybe some sort of repairs with that said, I do have an affidavit prepared by the inspector. With a initial inspection of June. 2025, notice mail on June. 20th notice served on June. 26 be a certified mail. Complaints are set for July 6th apartments out of compliance with the SoFi currently running. From July 7 to 25 to November 5th, 2522 days. 100 $1 a day bringing the civil fine to $12,200.3 inspections of 3.90. I like to enter. Then that an exhibit number one, as well as exhibits. 2, 3, And 5 notices of today's hearing. >> it all admit all of the exhibits, one through 5 that with the notice notice exhibits as well based on the affidavit, I will impose a civil fine today to $12,200. says Costa to 3.90, star, $100 per day really running find violations. Corrective final. The violations cited are continuing indicate a representative of the respondents are required to attend and what's available for us. >> We are looking December 18th at 10, 30. Welcome to the case. Up to 12/18/2025 at 10, 30, am. That will take us off the record on that case. All right. We're going to go on record for 2 cases, city of Sarasota versus Glencoe Properties. Group Corp. >> Case number 2025, 0, 0, 7, 1, 9, in 2025, 0, 1, 2, 6, 4, and certain which identify yourself for the record. Please see him going. Jim Glenn is present here on behalf of the respondent. And it's going to go into the water to INS win. So, alright, as you know, procedure, we start with the city when Mr. Spence into today for the city. Come right. Back to All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. I think >> First one continue case for 3 violations. First one being city section 16 Dash. 47. The commission of John Roberson trash known was corrected back. And September 23rd with our inspection next. When a city code sections 16 Dash. 49, the Providence overgrowth on undeveloped property remains out of compliance our inspection and final is one 5.1 Florida building code pertains to a fence that was installed without a permit. We're not any permits for the property. So that for district one of he thinks he can get. >> Permit 5, 4 or remove the fence. That also quick to Malaysian. But I'll let him speak on that. All right. So let me go to you on this. We didn't put a fence up so might have been the neighbor. don't know, but I'll take it down whenever wherever it is. Picture where it's at. they have That that are that would think he put up there. Does look like a big job easily take. Looks like to us to just a couple. >> He said the fence, I guess there. That's the fence. The >> always be with them. here of thing. But as Jim, I know as long as looks like it's running the the property line or there's not just Yeah, that portion with fans. Okay. All right. All As well as the overgrowth as well. sure. by the fence, OK, looks like it said road runs along the fence. We obviously can't see too much in the back. The property might as well be concede and that little alley portion, looks like in the rear as well as lining the that area, OK? All right. >> Are you want to go in this second case before you set a new date for these? >> This one is a new case for 2 person being city code. Section 16 dash 50 and that is just so for the record, it's a case. Number 2025, Dash, 0, 1, 2, 6, 4, >> First, 16 dash. 54 in a pub or on my sons. Vehicles as well as 16 dash. 29 be for heavy, dense rank, overgrowth. I developed property. Both those remain out of compliance as or inspection this week. You can see some scattered growth as well on the fence line and seems in the rear as well as vehicle in the front car. Port area has a a license and maybe an operable as well. So it's for district one of what he thinks get those violations taken care of and addressed. He was over there yesterday. So while double check it. But >> within a week we can get that done. All right. >> What's with the city looking for in terms of pushing these cases out? Right since we're keep together. We'll probably just push them out. Just in case something does pop up is up, says a vehicle there and 3 of the work with your tenant to get that problem. Yes, I do want bring back. 2 sons are probably looking to push us out into middle of December of that works out Mr. Going okay. That's fine. knew that way. And we're looking at December 18th. The recipient. >> mornings afternoons are better. Nothing. ? ? kind of full now in. But would a 11 very work out, OK? >> Are are continue both cases up to December 18th 11, 30. am. respect to the first cases, 0, 0, 7, 1, 9, the Violet 16. 47 corrected on September. 23. The other 2 violence. 60 49 be in Florida. Building Code section 105, but we're continuing on the sick kids. Both cases, both the violations are continuing 16, 50 inoperable. Iran license motor vehicle in 60. 49 be heavy, dense rank, overgrowth continue both KSAT December 18th at 11 30 and thank you, Mr. Going to take care. Danielle. All right. We're going record then for City of Sarasota versus 7, 4, 9 Siesta Holdings Incorporated case number 2025, 0, 0, 8, 7, 9, for the record. No one's here on behalf of Respondent's Siesta Holdings. So what the city's position on this case? I thank yourself. This is. >> Continue case. We have 4. 3 violations. also. First to our city code violations for being 16th at FORTY-SEVEN Commissioner John Rubbish and trash. >> Next one being 16 s 49 be very dense. Rank overgrowth. Develop property and final one is center Housing Co 305 3.2 pertains to patient disrepair and all 3 of those remain out of compliance. As of our inspection this week. So with that said, we're looking increase the daily running fine Tucci 50 a day. So that we can hopefully get some sort action on this. >> All right. I'll do that own, Chris. The daily running 5 to $250 per day. The Cape, the representatives required to attend the next hearing when it when want to bring this back. >> We are looking at. December 11th at 8.30. >> All Continue out to 12/11/2025, 08:30AM. off the record. All right. We're on record for city of Sarasota versus Patsy. I'm Davis's case number 2025, 0, 0, 6, 5, 1, And for the record your Patty Davis, Chris. Davis, you've been here before. See how it works, that we start with the city first, Mr. Spence's in for the city today. Come right. Back to you. Yes, okay, Mr. Spence, whatever your race or >> yes, thing your shows. This is a continue case. We had. Or 2 violations and they're both arson or housing code. 1, 1.6 for maintenance. standing as well as the sighting of the property. I'm pleased report that is our inspection of September. 19th 2025. The property is in compliance. >> Okay. I'm I'm gonna get great agreement with that. Yes, all right. I will find 1.6 of the standard housing code and one on one. The second went on as it applies to running, citing also in compliance 1, 1, 6, September 19. Takes to the issue of fines and cost city have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do. Your seems be spectrum. Is Davis was a prevailing in taken care of which we can where the situation. So we're looking for no finds no caution just to find violation. Okay. >> Well, the missed it. You can do any better than that. So I'm not asked for a response to recommendations for no fine and no cost. And except that I will oppose no final cause anything vacate in this case. There have a great day meant a Thank you. Thank you. Thanks for coming. All right. We're on record for city of Sarasota versus Jefferson. Raymond Barre, tell case number 2025, 0, 0, 8, 6, 3, and for the record. I think you are Jefferson apart right. Tamar, Tell you here before. So, you know the process, start with the city, Mr. Spence and for the city Today, Hill and the city of Sarasota's position on this. And I'll come back to you. Okay. All right, Mr. Spence, what are your rights are? >> I think you're so is this is a continue case. We had 4, 3 violations for being city code because section 16 Dash. 47 the commission, Rubbish and trash. Next one center has go through some 0.4. Hear from us is that chosen. Storing materials and items outside the property and the final and being zoning Section 6 Dash 102 J. One which is a violation of our zoning code for recreational vehicles as Mr of Art. you can see, the photos has numerous golf carts that are being stored in the front yard setback. So all these violations remain out of compliance. inspection this week. So that hurt of our toe when he thinks can get everything into compliance. >> All right. So let me go to you on this and >> the trailer is gone. It's going OK. >> But some other vehicles have to be removed as well. Correct, the golf carts and that kind of us. >> Why can't I have my yard? >> I'm not going all Mister Spence answer for the city on that we're going have be doing is a recreational vehicle and no need to be stored in the side or rear yard setback. >> Everybody in my neighborhood go quote from their front yard. >> Well, sir, that lot of people make those arguments, the other guys doing it. But have 30 cases here week, 1200 a year. So, you know, we don't know which one of your neighbors is also being cited. So just applies to everybody. So >> I can't have a golf cart my front yard on working on. >> Doesn't make any sense. I think the ordinance this 3 D you have it for 3 days as recall, they can't use is out there permanently. That's the the way it works. >> They're not out there permanently. I drive them around. I'm working on That's my. my hobby. >> You can maintain you can maintain your side yard. You just can't have it, you know, your front yard. That's all. Don't understand. >> Cannot build a fence and that we can see my art. That will work because of it's still it's still a violation. What's the violation? Having a recreational vehicle in your front yard? There is stop or it's just not permitted under city code. You always do. You talk to city commissioner about changing the law, but that right now the that laws in effect for everybody. So question is how much time you need to take care of this? >> I don't I'm gonna honestly have a golf cart. >> Well, shouldn't shut. All right. Let me ask this question. just start of $100 fine. They ideally want find today that what you want me to do. not really all right. The new I get another shot at this. How long you need to take take care of this problem is you make a profit since like. >> Show you a picture. My front yard run. I'm looking at a picture you for your write-up. There's talking about right today. All right. So here's the thing. If everything is in compliance just called in and the inspector come back out and take a look at it, OK? So I ask this question to you and I don't mean this in a hostile way. Should I continue this out a couple weeks? Give you a chance to try to solve this problem. Are you want to be the start of fine? You're just gonna take the position. I don't like the law go I cleaned up and Nestle. >> I've got so my whole life been turned upside down because of this. I cleaned up. That trailer was full of stuff. My garage was full of stuff. I had a big yard sale. Those pictures from the aftermath of the yard. need 3 weeks with released it for you. >> Sure, whatever. I want push it out 3 weeks, given, you know, the chance to try address this. >> I would really like to get rid of the smell. >> I really can't get rid of it. You can't get rid to up to, know, take care of the problem here. So mean, I could poke park a golf cart on my side yard that you see with that 1, 1, S that's my side yard. You want the inside think the inspector would come out and tell you where you can put. Actually the inspector won't answer my phone calls. All right. Well, I think they would. They take care of their work with you shows. That doesn't really hold on one second event, something that I really that I can offer We're not saying that he can't obviously repair and work on these. The excitement is how the is. You can't you know. >> You that it's just when he's not working on golf course to store them on the side yard. Is that a correct violations? Obviously is only there for say. You know, making some 63 hours that he's working on the VA, that the vehicles and once he's done, move it to the side yard. Is that a correct? The violation? Okay. Let's say that's a good suggestion. So I mean, here's what I'm gonna do. My pushes out 3 weeks. Give you a shot at this. And you know let you make decision would be want to go with it. But >> I'm trying to get something clarified You see where the orange golf cart is in the picture. The Orange One in the back. That's my side yard. our problem with parking them back there. It's got to advisory coffin the ordinance going to be out on the playing of the walls got to be behind the. >> know, it's got to be parallel back from the from the your side of your house cable. >> I'm asking the question. You see that side of my house where those 2 are parked on the side. The Orange us over. When you see that. >> Yes, or I do. But I can see where in relation to where they are. Death inspected spectrum. Come out and give you some advice on if you want to come of the fun. But this person wanting that Michaels? Well, I think they will answer it. So let's go ahead and just continue this out 3 weeks given and then, you know. Mr. I don't P other. Are you I see the it's been because the okay. She's outright. You when we should be back in. She's she's and she's part of She's also stills overseeing her. that this Okay. But I you'll take you to in the world get to you should give your calls at time for you. Okay. I don't need to call her. >> I would call I would call I would call her a waste of time. >> No, I think he'll respond to an because alert her that you're calling so. >> Because I think the lack of communication for the solved. A lot of this along. >> Well, the hopefully that hopefully that can that's going to solve at this time. So what what we we have we are looking at December. 11th that works for Mr. Bercow Month. And when your summertime 15. I want to it out to December levels. 09:15AM, for the violations. Continuous cited. And we'll see you then, sir. Good OK? Thank you. We're going to go on record for City of Sarasota. First EV Airport Holdings, LLC. >> Case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 3, 5, The record. No one's here on behalf of the respondents. So that was the city's position on this case. >> I think you're so this is a new case for 2 city for violations. First one being 16 Dash 47. The commission, John Robertson trash as well as 16 deaths. 49 C have a dense rank overgrowth on a vacant And please report. Those are inspection of. September. 25th. The property is in compliance. All right. Fine a 60 47 16. 49. See the city code were corrected 9/25/2025. >> Takes us to the issue of fines and costs and city have a recommendation on them. >> We We have enough care about inspector with initial inspection of June 18th, the 2025 noticed know that on July 3rd, served on July 12 be a certified mail compliance up for July 22nd. Properties compliance with find that ran from July 20 3rd, 2025 to September 24th for 64 100 $1 a day. going find the $6,400 for 3 inspections of 3.90, from answer that in as exhibit number one, as well that today's hearings as a 2, 3, all of that 1, 2, 3. And yes, revised the cost the affidavit, correct? >> Based on the affidavit, police say civil fine of $6,400 and cost The amount of 3.90. And violations are corrected. So that will take off the record. We'll go next. The city of Sarasota versus Srq Holdings Company LLC. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 8, 4, for the record. No one's here on responded. So was the city's position on case? >> tell us this is a continued case we had for to city code violations. First one being 16 Dash 47 accumulation of junk rubbish and trash as well as 16 dash. 49 see forever. Dan Streak over growth on it. They can live. We're not really seeing any further movement on this property has been no changes. You can see from most recent photos you've taken, we had a really know contact as So with that said, we're looking to increase the daily find and $50 day. >> Modify fire order. And raised the daily life to 50 per day indicate a representative. >> Respondent's. Acquired to attend the next hearing in which just in time. We are looking at December 4th at one. 45? You have to December. at one. 45 pm. >> Okay. We're on record for city of Sarasota versus Josi, Emory and Silver Lee, Silver forgiveness, Silver Green lately, its case number 2025, 0, 0, 9, 8, 0, and for the record Calvin writes, here is well answer your you. silver ring. Le. The brother, your brother is over and this is over an upside to female. Have sorry about that with your what's your name, sir? For the relatively dose of lead there. That's I should remember that from last week. Forgive me. All right. Mr. Lee, Mister Bryant, as always, I'll start with the city of start with the Mr. Spence Today. I come right back to Mr. Spence, whatever your race. >> so is this is a as you mentioned, for 3 violations. First one being 16 Dash 47. You mentioned Represen trash and then 2 violations of our standard housing code 305, 0.1 by which pertains to the fence that was in disrepair as well as excess restructure those in disrepair. If you're a 5.0, one adviser corrected back on our inspection of 10. 29 and then the junk treasure of which was corrected as of our special on 11 for some properties now in compliance. OK, I'm guessing Mr. Wright, you're agreeing with that are Mr. Leo can all find a 16. 47 was corrected. >> On 11/4/2025 1% of the city codes, dinner, housing code sections, 3 of 5, 15 3 of 5. 15 with the fence as well as the accessory structure were correct to doctor 10/29/2025. >> Takes us to the issue of fines and costs Mr. Spence, any questions before you make your recommendation for the city of this one? >> And there are speaking specter seeing everything that's been going on with the property. >> And seems that Mr. Bryant, as well Chile and once. >> They got addressed the situation with the needed. You and I got take care of a pretty quickly. We do have an affidavit prepared by the inspector with a potential civil fine that had accrued. Upwards of $13,300 with 5 inspections of $540. We're not gonna be seeking all that fine that link the time we would like to Rick you a $250 fine as well as all of our city's cost 5.40. >> Okay. Potential fund $13,300 to seize recommened to 50 find Costa 5.40. So I don't who wish respond to that recommendation. >> I would like to respond to If you could put that picture up with the trash on sidewalk. No, get. There's another one now with that. If come from all that stuff, okay. When this come along, that tree probably like 5 people. We moved I did it myself. We call this city. We call the city. had to move distracting staff. No, but I would move a credit were to have it in heavy equipment pick it up. And that trash bin that ever since this Tom. And they charged him all this money with just trash that the city should have paid for. He finally got panicking, pay somebody to $2400 to move that when you see in the bag, it detracts from the lead and know alone was on the property, the human fine. But it was in the bags. I think I call minute. I think it meant this. My cousin, she. Couldn't get you veteran ship before they cut off so she couldn't get out. The house. She died and we better about a month ago. No action. To get the stuff move. And I think this student should be. Responsible for that because got paid when the government to move this stuff and it got contact that they had. Even I call him, sees the whatever his name is. They come back and they look. And they They drive away. This city. Come know and look and they drive away. But yet they can find him. But not having this track move and they got. They were spotted. do this time? And sometime? I think it's so minority community that this can go on. That could be done except that he got all the fight. And I do appreciate him knocking thing that I think that's great. But should not even be. A fine. you find gun mission find the city not picking it up. His contract. Yeah, I go a little bit farther which I really did. hate. Protest. We have black folk that we need something done. We got to go and protest much but people property everybody that had nothing to do with separates. I hate that because it getting nothing done all the media, although that could become take pitches the Citadel to put a Band-Aid on it. And when the media gone and whatever the correct that at the same thing over and over and over again. Effective. It didn't just is what corrected when mount that the King died. That would be no move much. It. But they do it every day because it would never corrected. So people much and that can get done temporarily. That's why I hate it. Nothing ever changes just temporarily. And then when we caught complain and much. And again, the bad people. Going on to a bad thing when people highs whatever the case may innocent people. It's what I hate because nothing ever changes. You know, get go the way people order, lifted it out of control that and that would happen. But they would do what they supposed to do. >> We would need much. it would be no injustice. Just do what felt. But whole community of black and white. We do look and I hope the city commission and everybody listening to because Marchant never fix anything protest and never fixed nothing. They just put a Band-Aid on it and then move on and I hate it. Timothy I can think of well, you didn't even doing it for years and years and years. And we had the same problem. all come together. Both white and black and the tech, the problem and that tech each other. That's the problem. I don't think you should be fine anything because the city's to get him to $2400 back that he paid to have that move. And I'm going to go to the commission. And I'm going it. If I have to have a lawyer, got paid to get that picked up. But yet they find him all this money because the city didn't do the job. >> All right. Well, I appreciate that. I disagree with you about protests that you look at the civil rights movement that, you know, peaceful protest is what changed the law in this country. led to the 1960, for civil rights legislation. So I disagree with you about that, but I'm but what that was. But appreciate your comments here. No find no cost. And Mr. Bryant, you when you get when you announced your candidacy for the city commission here, sir. >> They would like me. Oh, I think I think could be an interesting run it because I would fight for what's right. Fraud has wondered about I think everybody need be. Have everything felt across to. I'm with never going to happen because politics it did it is cricket. And as both Democrat not holding back because really upset about it never Look back on the court just all over the world. I do have a fix. The problem, probably stay the same. But many people have died. And it's no changes. did. We protest with in the ticket of problem that would never be needing another protest. So a preview may disagree with but you show me away when protest would change nothing. Go back to mind that the king he died. lot of people the way people that that. I just black folk. Tonight. do what you're supposed have resigned. The whole thing is that is no such thing is pregnant. In that You see the love to hate absolutely heat, but nobody be a hated well, we'll preview his will. >> You know this and that where you just do the language used to justify you'll hate. You just a hater and just made. I made I hate government made it. Democrat and Republican item equally. >> All right. So I appreciate well, you we've got we've gone beyond the scope of code enforcement here today, but but but and I can't restore the 2400 bucks, but I can not impose fines of cost. And so I want go 0, 0, on that. Okay. And think it I think on this one. believe so. Yes, got a vacate the prior work that was was entered taking into consideration circumstances here. >> Mr. Prime a good point of that. >> All right. We're gonna go to the next case. You're ready. Go the next one. All right. We'll go to city. Really go city of Sarasota versus Whitney Bryant case. Number 2025, 0, 0, 1, 3, 2, for the record. Calvin right here on this one. And I don't think this is Mr. Li's case today, but go Mr. Spence, whenever you're >> You're so it's this is a continued we have for to city code violations. First one being 16 dash. 47 accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. Next one meeting 16 dash. 49 be very dense. Rank overgrowth. On the developed Please report that inspection of November 5th, both violations have been corrected now are in compliance. >> All right. That's right. I'm guessing you're in agreement with Yes, funded to 16, 47 60. 49 be was corrected the November 5th 2025. So going issue fines across questions, Mr. Spence Mr. Bryant, before you make your recommendation, only question plans moving forward to ensure that this doesn't come back out of compliance. All right, Mr. Spence's saying what's the plan to keep in compliance? Going forward? is. try this again. I will put a garbage can up front love posted down ago that a problem this want to we can pick up the trash. >> That did it before. And not only did they not put it in the garbage can bestow the garbage can. I'm doing everything I can possibly do, you know, this not I will wish go around. Across the street with the city allowed him to Do things are whatever do, though, trash over you. The wind blew over that. restaurant rat, it noted pressure with that. So it's it's probably going take me in. I'm a block up that one because I just when I left before put the ball back up. And what about ad today? And it not going to get to put it back up again. that what we mean? Route 30 properties that, you know, to do about >> I don't I don't get this a lot from. I tell people say, you know, you buy properties the properties of these locations, you just have You don't want to only what it can take care of. It is up to the owner. Yes, I mean, just. >> I just got to do what gotta do. It's not going change in think about it every The trash. I I just have to. And I just have to do it again. just, you know. >> All right. space with the city's recommendation on this one. >> for you. We have an invoice paired and boys from our city contract early to enter. And as exhibit number 4 for some of the work they had done a few months back to help clean up the property a little bit. As you can was done to clean up the property. But with that said, I do have the FDA are prepared by the inspector with a potential civil fine that accrued upwards of $27,500 with 11 specs shuns including contract and boys bring that cost $1000 for $1045. The city is not gonna be asking for all that fine. Really seeking a one and a fine as well as the cost of 7 or $50. >> All right. That's right. Let me go with that recommendation. You Mr. Spence's recommendation on that one. Get your response. Bike. >> as a with $750. >> Costs are 7.50, isn't. This is because of some 50, recommending a one-day fun of $100 potential funds. 27 5. They're recommending a one when they find $100. >> I just hope you won't mind of 100. >> 100 plus that could the city's cost of 7.50. >> But obviously, just to do everything I can to do that. And I think. What they do it illegally across street. Want to become a lot. It created a problem and and I get fined because it's not going to this if to don't doing that. be back again. I could go back. Matt back with clean up before 2 pitches. When that I needed clean again. Because I know can make the coat. And even this morning I went enough. You had to pick check this morning. I'm just going to continue to find this man is never going to correct the problem. Into the city do what they need to do. I want to be the one. That going to be having to pay. And if having me. Now, if I went for and that it I think I should pay that. But pushing police driving around just taking pictures and pace of $100. I think that's COVID because if I wasn't trying. I I can okay, you know the board when you when you take the boat that I get it boarded up that law aboard up in a tent. Not I got to go. But every day the 52 to bow down to going sleep. >> All right. Well, I you 27,005 potential, fine, you know, their recommendations. You know, one day, find it. You know, side, what I'm gonna do is I'll go with a one day. Find of 100 cost 500. Understand your situation that, you know. I think probably the remedy is. You know, for you is I don't know what the situation is across the street there. But, you know, maybe either way, you know, COVID caused the code enforcement. You know, if they're if they're violating city code may be with or or or if there's some issue, you know, city commissioner think as you mentioned earlier. >> parked car back up >> I don't I don't know what the deal is. I have to I'm not sure of that. Whose property is what you're talking about. Their exactly put only things like that. You're the only only person that can really remedy the situation. Otherwise these properties, as you know, can't control it. Nobody else can come on your property in clean. if you look at the picture got caught parked on the property. >> In the city should just not let them talking. I would call him. >> I would call >> And in just Colin we do is call the complaint. And if it's a violation code that >> they'll go out and inspect it. Maybe that'll help too. vigilant. You know. >> I thought about 10 2, bill and I guess what this to track, they're going to be thrown open and I'm going to solve the problem. And other problem. The sentiment that best you do. >> I went 500 caught one day. Find snow. I would win 500. And make it on this one to do. Abe get the big fines that accumulated. I think it's probably 20 grand finds a Big 8 >> This bright, always nice to see. Those are always a pleasure. They take care. Thank you. >> Alright, sir, take you have a good day. I thank you. Thank you. Thank Thank you. Thank you. >> going to go on record perceive Sarasota versus Daniel. As for Al case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, And for the record, no one's here for the respondent this What's the city's position on? >> Your honor. This is a new case for a violation of our city Code. Section 16 dash. 49 be. I have dense rank overgrowth on develop property as our inspection this week, the property stones out of compliance. We haven't really had much contact. As you can see. It's a pretty heavily overgrown. >> So with that said, I do have a affidavit prepared by the inspector may have a initial inspection of June 17th 2025. >> Notice mailed on June. 26 notice served August second, be a posting. Point set for August. 7th problem is out of compliance with A fine currently running from August. 8th 2 November 5th for 90 days at one dollars a day, bringing the civil fine too $9,000 with 3 inspections of 390 and to that end, I think number one as well as that today's hearing, exhibit number 2. >> Arnold meant one and 2. And based on the affidavit, all imposes civil fine of $9,000 to date. While it does continue with this plan costs of 3.90, today Star $100 ad running fine indicate the Daniel for Al is required to attend. >> The next hearing and what's available for us. >> We're doing. >> December 4th at 02:00PM. To that December 4th at 02:00PM that will take us off the record. Art run record for a city of Sarasota versus the tell you cook. Our Elizabeth Petra could cause of on Daniel who car case number 2025, 0, 0, 1, 5, 7, And for the record sir, you're Daniel Barker and get that up a car your name for the record, please. The Italia who got okay. Very good. Alright, very good. Thank you. procedure. You know, I work that we start with the city start with Mr. Spence today for the City of Sarasota not come back to get your response. >> Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready serve, there's this is a we had. >> We're a violation of our Florida building code, one of 5.1 from its required where there a tear innovations in a garage enclosure done without a permit. As well appears to be a believe, a some fans work that was also done in court. In my notes. The fence interrogations are still pending We haven't really seen any movement on the fence permit. Since April. And I understand for the interior innovations, Cougars or their contractor of turned in a trans middle yesterday. But it needs some time to review. So if some when they thinking corrections done to the fence as well as a time frame that if everything goes smoothly with interrogation, when they think they can complete that work, but they need a permit for the fence or they don't they apply for the front for the fences. Just don't see any movement since April for permit was issued and they haven't it was as applied for, but their correction center out in April in city's requesting more information, for permit. >> And the contractors applied for the 1, 0, 5, one issue. Otherwise. Alright, sir, I guess that to the question is when can you get with the city to get the information they requested? So budget, this goes. >> And the 2000, the 22 and effects it because they get everything demolished. It like it from inside cabinets over things. And then the fix leg installing new guy. Ben, that's a new floating is with the wood was kept the phone that the left circle could ice coming sight. You because this guy before you don't do any treatment. like to discover that because look at the school could it was big like, you know, 2 inches. We connect the phone to throw they going to be found. Is going from goodness? I'm like, yeah, I was so upset to be closed. This. And dot by. like installing concrete connected close to his daughter and change daughter because school could act. But did. But is it too whole? And I haven't a book. >> Shoe. >> Old bicycle planes that. I can look coming to fence on the floor few because she sent it's place said how. Defense but fall in France correctly. But she took to me. I cannot comment late that should this is a love that here were could come any time too make it making Both them sent half of the comment even that is simply use it. And who is my life on the home? saw somebody. Got to some Bushes, going hold the phone Memphis. Huge life. My tip that, you know, he cut into guys, would you do with them broke with it? Your neighbor love that. Come in and got that Bush You've got Pompeii some bushes and guys, you can't just that and did before she coming times, but decided not to fight this neighbor because look to you. Don't it. But the time this guy was over the age of he was much of got Bushes. I'm calling Bullis. Police gunman had explain to woman got you. She can't do that. And Be forced to over fence. He make the law to prop like to run the Bulls. The installing clothes. This got us going decided by voters that because like in the state, have a flow through the room access to all and she call in to inspect key to puzzle? Put him Why this inspector came in and said, no, you can't to moved or this is will. I'm quite it. Is it a comment that you hired a company credit plumbing companies, a check of the Lumbee think why mission companies that take it everything was fine, unquote. It's tough to. is defined it. This good are going to be the same clothes. last time the labels be. I was goal apply this to quote Inforcement. sets make a sketch. But you don't build any structural wall just in sight. that it would weaken and too. I'm coming to this because of complaint that make a sketch and make its case. But Karen, to come up to you look, you have to fight it. A few director. You know, when I kind of that could effect of these could double. They put me on the line. It debut a day they it knows a kid. This is blueprint seal it. Is it different could affect the and gives like if you it could action. Last time decided go to Kate making this We waiting for final inspection from. Like that. I so as I understand it. So the the permit has been applied for for the work. >> On the property, right? And there are other additional information or they are. They're just just processing it right now. >> As of right now for the interior renovation for the kitchen. the Cougars did apply are turning transmit allies of yesterday. Okay. That needs to be reviewed. So they because of he's got to work on that permit. And offense offense is who's good. they taking out a note as owners of the property, the fence permit years as owner permit so you can do it. I think what you have to do it, you have to give them the information they need to. I was I did this. It comes sort of a company they make it everything they But they working so slow as who are double. see what's going on. So you're waiting for that survey or to finish up. So you can finish with delay. Get some stick it on the property. But I don't make it like it's something broke. Gnesen. >> But like it. yeah, see where you're at, OK? Well, I think sounds like your work, but you're working on is what it Yes, okay. I got it. 45 days out on this? You think you're probably probably close to 60 just as the holidays? Dock it while you want push his case out 60 days, your sounds like you're on the right track with your. >> permit for structure there and then you're working. You're working on to get the survey during through there job and that you and then put in information. So will pushes out 60 days to review its 60 day. So what's the what's the suggested they were going to? 26, are we not? >> turn around. We're looking at January that works for you. and that when you go to break. Come back here in years. >> I've I've have 7th Yeah. Well, I want to of the birthday. We had something on the 15th, their summit. We have the 15th. 15 so well for the January 15th that what mornings or afternoons want look it 30. It will it out to 08:30AM, on January. 15th in hope you have a good birthday in January. A fake here. Thank you. Thank you. you. just thinks. >> Colombo partnership of Florida General Partnership as trustee, the. >> Alright for 2 Royal Palm Avenue Interest agreement, case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 3, 8, For the record. No one's here for the respondent. So it's the city's a position on this one. >> think you are this is a new case for a violation of our city section 16. 47 accumulation of junk rubbish and trash. I'm pleased report that as a respect on November 4th, the property is now in compliance. >> All right. If I know the violations 60 47 was correct in 11/4/2025 taking us immediately to the issue of fines and cost cities position on that. >> Well, you have an active repaired by inspector with initial inspection of June 6 to 2025. notice melt on June 18. It served on August second via posting plan set for August 7th. >> Is in compliance with the fun that ran from August 8 to 2025 to November. 3rd, Brady is at $10100 a day bringing the civil fine to the $8,800.3, inspections of 390 make sure that that exhibit number one as well as number 2 for notice of today's hearing. >> All right. And that the the 1, to their and based on the afternoon, the post fines and costs right pose a civil fine of $8,800 cost 3.90. was the total. Finally something to begin on this one. I know you're asked case. All right. So go ahead impose those. And that will take us off the record because the violation is correct. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota to help me with these names are with that with a bid to beat like leg and are responding. All right and say this is case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 5, 6, and your name for the record or body. It was always present with us. Thank you, sir. ship to help their off start with the City of Sarasota. Help the hello, Mr. Spence well in city's position on this come right back to you. So Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, I think so is this is a new case for violation of our Florida building code. >> One of 5, one permits required in relation to some shared work that was done without a was including like a roof work, some decking, some rafters Eves, interior framing and some electrical believe, Sir Paul years contractor did apply for a permit, but it was just approved due to not including the full scope of work, a sprawling relation to anything seeing get and so first contractor to apply for that permit to get a You know, includes scope or just turn and transmitted to reflect the full scope of work that had taken place. I get your response. >> Good morning. much. we working with injured Aaron? Because we figure all this so many issues. And I do have a with that drawing guy engineer, they let you know and they call the city. They are King want to project for me. They need more time. Just weighed After they can have. Perfectly few times, I will submit the payments and all that stuff. Just we need more time. how much time you thinking. >> The last time I spoke last week with him and well, you see days how that next week is going to happen, right? that for this make? And it's almost end of that week and I got But it's it's a little like it's close. Yes, all right. I got as something like that because I have every other week, you just make push his case to give you a chance to work through that process a little bit there. What's the city recommending on this one >> little bit longer than we typically would allow just because of the the holidays in the current schedule. We're doing. So we're looking right a

Code Compliance Hearings

AGENDA

CODE COMPLIANCE HEARINGS

November 6, 2025

SRQ Media Studio Osprey

08:15

a.m.

TO BE HEARD AT 8:30 AM

1.

Gary Easterling, 2 Lands End Ln, Case No. 2025-00999

2.

Don Dinh, Thuy Thi Nguyen, 1165 Mecca Dr, Case No. 2025-01133

TO BE HEARD AT 8:45 AM

3.

Mark L Musser, Thelma K Musser, 3035 Browning St, Case No. 2025-0048

4.

204 N Adams LLC, Najmy Thompson PL - Registered Agent, 204 N Adams Dr, Case No.: 2025-01062

TO BE HEARD AT 9:00 AM

5.

Betty Jean Blue as to a Life Estate, Gail E Robinson as Remainderman, Gloria J Madison as Remainderman, Fred Blue as Remainderman, 2022 29th St, Case No.: 2025-01017

6.

FTF Lending, LLC, C T Corporation System - Registered Agent, 3615 Higel Ave, Case No. 2024-01086

TO BE HEARD AT 9:15 AM

7.

749 Siesta Holdings Inc, Michelle Perez - Registered Agent, 749 Siesta Dr, Case No. 2025-00879

8.

Glenco Properties Group Corp Ulrich Scarlett Watts & Dean PA - Registered Agent, 1770 23rd St, Case No. 2025-00719

9.

1651 23rd St, Case No. 2025-01264

TO BE HEARD AT 9:30 AM

10.

Patsy M Davis, 1936 7th St, Case No. 2025-00651

11.

Jefferson Raymond Bartell, 980 S Allendale Ave, Case No.: 2025-00863

TO BE HEARD AT 10:00 AM

12.

EB Airport Holdings LLC, Eric Baird - Registered Agent, 5400 Old Bradenton Rd, Case No.: 2025-01135

13.

SRQ Holdings Company LLC, Romina A Ronda - Registered Agent, Dr Martin Luther King Jr Way (PID #2024020103), Case No. 2025-01084

TO BE HEARD AT 10:15 AM

Showing the first 24,000 of 108,085 characters. The full document is at the source.

>> All right. We're going to go on record for that. code compliance. Special magistrate hearings. Today's date is 11/6/2025 first case on the docket city of Sarasota. First, Gary Easterling case number 2025, 0, 0, 9, 9, 9, The record know it's here for during the Sterling. Various really is not present. So start with the city and Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir. >> There are cells. This is a continued case we have for violation of our Florida building code 5.1 permits required where there's interior work that have been done, please. We do have some good progress being made at a gas ref in those past on 10. 22 and they should gas final that is scheduled for today. So probably going to push us out a couple weeks. Tell on complete the inspections. Our lives. So what's available for us? With holidays? Coming up? Let's do December 4th at one. 45? All right. continue out to December. >> For one 45 pm. Find a violation continuing confirm the water takes off the record. >> this a donde in? You hear me, sir. don't do it. Yes, yes, sir. This is Richard Ellis serving as magistrate of the City of Sarasota. How are you this morning, sir? Or can you hear me understanding? All right. So some of you can understand me. I'm going to start with the city of Sarasota's of for the record. This case is City of Sarasota versus done then pie and I don't know. Newton and it's case number 2025, 0, 1, 1, 3, 3, and Mr. De I always start with the City of Sarasota saw start with Mr. Spence Hope you hear hear him understand him and then I'll come go back to you and get your response. Okay. All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> I think selves. This is a continue case. We had for a violation of our city code section 16 dash. 49 C for heavy dense rank overgrowth on a vacant lot. I'm pleased report that is our inspection on November. 3rd, the property is now in compliance. >> All right. Mister Dan, Mr. Spence's saying the properties in compliance it as a very special on November. 3rd, I'm guessing you're in agreement with that. >> Yes, but I did my guide game. unknown them on way before that. I also speak to Adam the inspectors which came on the July of 19. >> All right. So are you saying it was taking care of and July of 19 and you called in to the to the city with been completed. >> And then just update that you want to reject This week's. Up the case following up to up to date. >> OK, so that was just say, let's see. I'm looking at. All right. Well, let's let's look. That may be consistent with the pictures of the scene. This Java. We have a July 17th. Picture picture. looks. It's not. It's at that point. The grass is still up. So you know, so. Anyway? Well, I think it for the record that I will find November 3rd, is that correction date? You know, the process for future references, you know, ever that's completed. You called in. They confirm with you that completed. So anyway. So we go to the issue, fines and costs, Mr. Spence, the city have a recommendation on Yes, are we don't have to. >> From a prior hearing you had entered in 4 >> and assessed. Find that you did for $8,400 with 3 inspections of 3.90, it seems that Mr. Uddin was billion that cares a ruling to be asking for $500 fine and the costs of 3.90. All Mr. Did you understand Mr? Spence's recommendation. >> But that Corning, to talk when I talked to inspect, though he came out July 19, I did think at the end of the day on July 19 and I also received also in the the court ordered that the service was done by on the July 19 on here. >> Alright And in this case that asking only for the $500 fine. So this thing was originally service it back in June of this year. So I think that's it. The potential fines, $8,400, the city is recommending only a $500 fine. I'm gonna go with that. just cost of 3.90, joining of a Kate. The prior order you to bake hate the prior order that at the larger fine. That's going to close it out. Just just a warning to you, Mr. Dan, the there's a repeat violator provision in the city code. If the same responded is cited for the same thing within 5 years of fines can run $500 a day. So be careful going forward. I hopefully have a service now that's going stay on top of But this will close out the case today and obey Kate. The previous order that established a larger fine and we'll wrap it up here today. You've got a copy of order in the in the by email in also also have have a link in it as to how how to pay it. Okay. All right, sir. Have a good day. Take here. Thank you. We're going record next for city of Sarasota versus Markelle Musser. And Thelma sir. case number 2025 0, 0, 4, 8, 8, answer for the record date. Your name again, please. Rubin Fisher. been fissures here. Mr. Fischer, I know you've been here for a number of people say, you know the process here. I always start with the city of start with Mr. Spence. And soon as sense as for fish to come right back to pencil eraser, us this is a continued his. We had 4, 3, violations. A person being Florida building code 5, one permits for fired. >> And that's in relation to to do you know, it's our install without a permit or secondary doing this. All that permit because Section 6 DASH 2, a to B or use of the property as there's 2 dwelling units and the final thing, 7 dash 602 CC 2.1 C wishing pertains to to doing with neither one being owner of fight on each side. We haven't seen any corrections that were sent out back in June since then. So the different Mr. Fisher when he thinks can get some corrections turned in that we get the permit process moving forward. OK, Mr. Fish. Yesterday at printed off the signed and sealed. Plans. Finally. And I got. This week, I want to. Submit to the city the transmittal for that. And the other list that the city had gave me too. Who's sending as a print transmittal? I'm sure there's a few things, but I got that all together. just this week sometime I want to I want to submit to the city what they requested and then whatever it takes. When they come in to permit them a call for inspection. >> Questions, Mr. just the one question of like a timeframe of when fish are things that once obviously it's contingent on in the permit issued. But when you think can be, you know, everything turned in for a proper review as well as the inspections to be called in to close out the permit. They answer. The first question was you're going turn it in this week for the. >> The permit, correct? Right. But on next to the next question is how long what's the permits issue was? How long the process going to take that? >> As soon I get the permit as soon as the city players, everything that I hand in. Hopefully I don't have to, you know, hopefully everything will be OK. Call for a permanent. I'll call for inspection like, you know, within a couple days from that release, according to, you know, get a fight to get a final. How long did yesterday it's going to take what you get the permit. 2 that fast. shouldn't take me that long. But I'm giving myself some time. You know that's get the permit cleared. understood. So alright, that answer your question, Mr. Spence slightly. My only concern is. >> we >> have cited for 2 dwelling means enough for a kitchen and stuff so that it seems like there would be have to be some work that would take place to return. It. You know, as to one hole unit unless one of the owners is going to be residing within one of those you that atu side or accessory dwelling unit or the main living structure. So that feel like there could be some further work needed. So it just, you know, not saying because you couldn't get it done in 2 weeks past pending permit issues, just a feeling of the kind a tight, tight window. >> So I wasn't quite aware of what he was saying. If if there's more work than yes, there's will need more time if that if that comes back to me. Well, in terms of bringing this back, so, you know, we had the first the threshold of getting the want, information to the >> department. You want to bring this back in 30 days? 45 60? Probably 60 due to the okay. So comfortable as but the holidays, etc. I will bring this case back in 60 day. So what's available and to the new Year? >> Also would like to make it known, Mr. Fisher for the case, we do have it running into 50 a day. So they need to be done it is of the time is of the essence in this. And what he says is saying so. >> We're looking at January 8th, the worst times for sure. And what you want to knock out. First thing he 30. That be fine. All right. That's all they'll come to the case up to January 2026. At 08:30AM, find a violation of 105, of Florida building code. >> So could sections 6 to a to B and 6 6. 7, 6, 0, 2, CC 2.1 C. this can otherwise confirm the order that does leave the fine running is, you know, I can revisit those things. If things are prosecuted. Well, so OK, but they have a good day, sir. Take care. Thank you. The next the city of Sarasota versus tool for North Adams LLC. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 6, 2, For the record. Respond is not present. Here. Today representative for the responders not present. So whats the city's position on this case. >> There's also this is a continuing as we have for 3 violations. First one being city code section 16 Dash 47 Commissioner Roche and trash. Next one being 16 dash. 29 see every dense rank overgrowth on a vacant lot and final and being section as any good section. 7 dash, 2, 7, for the use of the property as they are storing building materials on property as well as a construction trailer as are inspections this week probably remains out of compliance for all 3 violations. You know. So that said we would like to increase the daily running fine to $250 a day. >> Right. Modify the prior order, increase the daily and to to 50 per day indicate a representative for the responders required to attend next hearing. What? So when you want to bring this one back? ? >> Let's to December. 11th at 8.30. >> out to December. 11th at 08:30AM. >> This is thing. >> Mr. Gyngell. This is Richard Ellis serving as magistrate the City of Sarasota. How are you, sir? >> Good. Good hair. very good. If you're ready will go on record for your case which is styled city of Sarasota vs. >> Ftf Lending LLC. It's case number 2024 money. let me let me grab my colleague good lead on this. >> Okay. Sure. Thank you. Good morning, Michael. Good morning, sir. This is a rise is telling Mr. Gyngell. This is Richard also serving as magistrate all City of Sarasota. Michael Good morning. I before you and the last time. Hurry. That's right. Yeah, I do very well. Thank you. And I let me back up a little bit. I kind of sped up through that and cup. We'll be through your colleague there off a little bit. But it this is a city of Sarasota versus Ftf Lending LLC case number to 2024 0, 1, 0, 8, 6, >> And so you gentlemen, for the record, I always start with the city as you know, and Mr. Spence's in for the city today. And then I'll come right back to you. OK? >> Eventually, no problem. All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready serve. >> Yes, thank you. this is a continue case we have for 2 violations of our city Code Section 17, 11 which pertain to yard waste. No roof on the property as well as a fence that was in disrepair. I'm pleased to report that is our inspection of 11, 4. >> Property is now in compliance. It all violations corrected now on the property from the city's response as a vote for the inspection 11, 4. >> All right. Mister Clinton, want to respond to Mr. Spam, guess you're in agreement with that? >> know that I agree with the that really appreciate city's patient understanding with obviously had wrinkles with the foreclosure and the change in ownership that are. But obviously it's been a pleasure to work with city. And I appreciate there your patience and understanding as progress in the case have been great to communicate with them. Agree with the update. They've been great with communication and email. We've asked for things and like I both professionally and personally appreciate. >> Their outreach in workmanship throughout the case. >> All right. That's point. I'm sure they appreciate that as well. So that's a point. go to Mister in terms of the issue of fines and costs. And then of course, come back to get your response to that. So Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready on that as before you continue, I asked Palumbo and we've had communications prior. >> But I guess to your plans moving forward, keep the property maintain just to avoid future of violations. >> think they So with that, what I can is I get the following. Future communication. If there would be any type of violations, I would always be at first violation be addressed to the current property owner, which is my client. I D Investment LP. I would requested second to the notice to our office as well so that we have full apprised what's going on. And there is delay in getting noticed as well taking corrective action. But to respond to the question directly, I my client is intending to remain in compliance. They are trying to sell it as we get into two-week had the put your I don't know how quickly it may happen, did for a period offseason. But I know down there is more of a busy season as far as winter. So hopefully they will hold a 2, 2 on same time during their The intent to remain in compliance. But important for me, at least as their counsel. 2. Have noticed in a timely manner. So that if the county can are searching, the can send the notice both to the client and to myself of the council. That would be greatly appreciated and actually provide any address that you may need in order for the notices to go to the correct parties. >> All right. Some Mr. Spence City have a recommendation on this one. >> We do. are. We have day care. are find that had accrued to just over $90,000 due to and the initial part of the case where no one was in attendance. You know, we such fine as well as increase the fine to to 50 a day. As well as inspections. That crew to $990. The city is not gonna be asking for all that fine. We're only going to be asking for $1000 fine due to the length of the time of the process as well as the city's inspections cost 9.90. >> All right. Mr. Plummet. You understand Mr. Spence's recommendation that the potential fine based on the affidavit that you can't see is $90,050 and assess costs for the process. You're 9.90. So he's asking for $1000 fine and costs of 9.90. So want to get your response said if I could. >> I get your honor. I would much mitigation as possible. I would be it but for the foreclosure process that occur just the last few months, my client was not the property owner. It International Group LLC. However, as a response to lender, my client to take practiced steps >> in advance that again, we're not their responsibility that they did in order to bring compliance with He didn't matter here. I guess it would also add that. To find the cause too. I get the the lack of responsibility that Blue International took his property owner throughout the whole pendency, matter except for when the foreclosure sale took place. I would also I as for mitigation, with respect to. In my opinion, I think corrective steps one. Camp Blanding in that Ivy. I Bl Investment LP took the action toward notice of the action. I believe the to take. Fairly timely steps to correct Concerns and tried to be a communique this possible. As far as when the steps would be taken. Cheddar ultimately result better. >> All right. So appreciate that. It do is I will cut the fine the recommended 5 and half to 500. But I am going to assess the costs of 9.90, you know, somebody you early on in this case dropped the ball. You wasn't you when you what you got involved in a everything kind of moved along appropriately. But is looking to link the time of this is 11/8/2024 there were. where year later. So, you know, it's kind of a balancing act. You've been great about trying be responsive on this. I appreciate that. Somebody with a $500 fine cotton i-ninety do have finds to vacate on this Yes, your honor of a kit. The large fines of accrued in the case already. >> that's going to close it out. Mister Palumbo, thank you for participating with this thing. Appreciate it. >> New Promenade, you're on a can. city or court's order from the hearing today and that if he hadn't. It didn't lending because they're getting the mail. But then taking a while for it to get to my client. I D can. I provide the court with that. appropriate address for where the mail order to date email count. How many beacon about an e-mail address going to be more efficient, maybe an email address that to send this to. >> And also send a link as to how to pay it as well. So I see you my e-mail Michael M I T H a E L. >> At in George, Paul Law said that Dolly W then LL the dot com. So Michael, I G P Law LLC dot com and your honor. I would be glad the mail service as opposed to, you know, certified mail or regular mail that define mail service fined for this ordinance with e-mail you the order and the link. And I really appreciate respond. Have a good day, sir. Take care. >> Thank you get in city council. I do appreciate the the cooperation, the all throughout the matter should thank you. >> These day. mentioned thinking about >> All right. The next case on the docket is city of Sarasota versus Bill. Very Jean Blue is to a life estate. Gayle, you Robinson is re major in Gloria J. Madison is remainder Manfred blues, remainder man. Case number 2025, 0, 1, 0, 1, 7, for the record. No one's here on behalf of the respondents. spent go to you with the city's position on this case. >> cells, this is new case for most violations. First city codes. Those are 16 dash. 47 accumulation, Jean Chretien trash. And second one, being 16 dash 50 or an opera unlicensed vehicles. Both those remain out of As of our inspection this week and the remaining are housing code violations first one is through a 3005.1 as well as through 3005.2, which pertain to the roofs of the property in disrepair. There are pertains to the windows. As well as 0, 5, point. 11.1 which pertains to exterior doors and through 5 point number 2 is also exterior doors and then 3 of 5.1 5 which pertains accessory structures. All of those remain out of compliance this week. We're not seeing any permits for that for any sort of demolition or any sort of repairs on the property. >> that's on the attendance to speak up on no timeline of when they think being in a demo and or maybe some sort of repairs with that said, I do have an affidavit prepared by the inspector. With a initial inspection of June. 2025, notice mail on June. 20th notice served on June. 26 be a certified mail. Complaints are set for July 6th apartments out of compliance with the SoFi currently running. From July 7 to 25 to November 5th, 2522 days. 100 $1 a day bringing the civil fine to $12,200.3 inspections of 3.90. I like to enter. Then that an exhibit number one, as well as exhibits. 2, 3, And 5 notices of today's hearing. >> it all admit all of the exhibits, one through 5 that with the notice notice exhibits as well based on the affidavit, I will impose a civil fine today to $12,200. says Costa to 3.90, star, $100 per day really running find violations. Corrective final. The violations cited are continuing indicate a representative of the respondents are required to attend and what's available for us. >> We are looking December 18th at 10, 30. Welcome to the case. Up to 12/18/2025 at 10, 30, am. That will take us off the record on that case. All right. We're going to go on record for 2 cases, city of Sarasota versus Glencoe Properties. Group Corp. >> Case number 2025, 0, 0, 7, 1, 9, in 2025, 0, 1, 2, 6, 4, and certain which identify yourself for the record. Please see him going. Jim Glenn is present here on behalf of the respondent. And it's going to go into the water to INS win. So, alright, as you know, procedure, we start with the city when Mr. Spence into today for the city. Come right. Back to All right, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. I think >> First one continue case for 3 violations. First one being city section 16 Dash. 47. The commission of John Roberson trash known was corrected back. And September 23rd with our inspection next. When a city code sections 16 Dash. 49, the Providence overgrowth on undeveloped property remains out of compliance our inspection and final is one 5.1 Florida building code pertains to a fence that was installed without a permit. We're not any permits for the property. So that for district one of he thinks he can get. >> Permit 5, 4 or remove the fence. That also quick to Malaysian. But I'll let him speak on that. All right. So let me go to you on this. We didn't put a fence up so might have been the neighbor. don't know, but I'll take it down whenever wherever it is. Picture where it's at. they have That that are that would think he put up there. Does look like a big job easily take. Looks like to us to just a couple. >> He said the fence, I guess there. That's the fence. The >> always be with them. here of thing. But as Jim, I know as long as looks like it's running the the property line or there's not just Yeah, that portion with fans. Okay. All right. All As well as the overgrowth as well. sure. by the fence, OK, looks like it said road runs along the fence. We obviously can't see too much in the back. The property might as well be concede and that little alley portion, looks like in the rear as well as lining the that area, OK? All right. >> Are you want to go in this second case before you set a new date for these? >> This one is a new case for 2 person being city code. Section 16 dash 50 and that is just so for the record, it's a case. Number 2025, Dash, 0, 1, 2, 6, 4, >> First, 16 dash. 54 in a pub or on my sons. Vehicles as well as 16 dash. 29 be for heavy, dense rank, overgrowth. I developed property. Both those remain out of compliance as or inspection this week. You can see some scattered growth as well on the fence line and seems in the rear as well as vehicle in the front car. Port area has a a license and maybe an operable as well. So it's for district one of what he thinks get those violations taken care of and addressed. He was over there yesterday. So while double check it. But >> within a week we can get that done. All right. >> What's with the city looking for in terms of pushing these cases out? Right since we're keep together. We'll probably just push them out. Just in case something does pop up is up, says a vehicle there and 3 of the work with your tenant to get that problem. Yes, I do want bring back. 2 sons are probably looking to push us out into middle of December of that works out Mr. Going okay. That's fine. knew that way. And we're looking at December 18th. The recipient. >> mornings afternoons are better. Nothing. ? ? kind of full now in. But would a 11 very work out, OK? >> Are are continue both cases up to December 18th 11, 30. am. respect to the first cases, 0, 0, 7, 1, 9, the Violet 16. 47 corrected on September. 23. The other 2 violence. 60 49 be in Florida. Building Code section 105, but we're continuing on the sick kids. Both cases, both the violations are continuing 16, 50 inoperable. Iran license motor vehicle in 60. 49 be heavy, dense rank, overgrowth continue both KSAT December 18th at 11 30 and thank you, Mr. Going to take care. Danielle. All right. We're going record then for City of Sarasota versus 7, 4, 9 Siesta Holdings Incorporated case number 2025, 0, 0, 8, 7, 9, for the record. No one's here on behalf of Respondent's Siesta Holdings. So what the city's position on this case? I thank yourself. This is. >> Continue case. We have 4. 3 violations. also. First to our city code violations for being 16th at FORTY-SEVEN Commissioner John Rubbish and trash. >> Next one being 16 s 49 be very dense. Rank overgrowth. Develop property and final one is center Housing Co 305 3.2 pertains to patient disrepa

All meeting actions

Source coverage incomplete

36 meeting items captured. The published sources do not prove this is the complete docket.

Showing 12 of 36

Browse by category36 actions

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
BudgetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
MinutesNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Code Compliance Hearings
  • Code Compliance Hearings — Closed Captions

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • A medium- or high-grade, non-procedural agenda-item analysis for the meeting digest
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.
  • Low-grade, ungraded, procedural, or superseded items remain in the complete agenda inventory rather than the meeting digest.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: a02b63b8d9aa8211fce6a6bbe25b83ac. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record