Board of Appeals Meeting (2026-03-10)

**MINUTES** **March 10, 2026** **BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING** **9:00 a.m.** **City Council Chambers** **Roseville Electric Building** **116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor** **Roseville, CA**

**1. CALL TO ORDER** Chairperson Sharon Lawin called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers.

**2. ROLL CALL (SILENT)** The following Hearing Panel members were present: Sharon Lawin Charles Sandoval Robert Schmitt

The following Staff members were present: Travis Cochran, Senior Deputy City Attorney Lynda Risucci, Board Secretary

**3. IDENTIFICATION OF CHAIR** Chairperson for the March 10, 2026 hearing was Sharon Lawin.

**4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE** Chairperson Sharon Lawin led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

**5. PUBLIC COMMENT** No one from the public offered any comments.

**6. SWEAR IN** Chairperson Sharon Lawin administered the Oath to those in attendance who would be offering testimony at the hearing.

**7. MATTERS TO BE HEARD**

**7.1. Administrative Citation No.: 22168** Appellant: Karina Regan, 1403 Oakmont Drive, Roseville, CA 95661 • Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.16.010, Licensing, Three Counts

**D. Panel Discussion and Decision:** The panel discussed the evidence and testimony presented for Administrative Citation No. 22168. In regard to Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.16.010, Licensing, Three Counts, a motion was made by Charles Sandoval and seconded by Robert Schmitt to:

* **FOR TWO (2) COUNTS OF VIOLATING 7.16.010:** GRANT THE APPEAL AND DISMISS THE CHARGE because the City/Complainant did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence: * That the violation occurred; and/or * That the appellant is the responsible party. * **FOR ONE (1) COUNT OF VIOLATING 7.16.010:** DENY THE APPEAL AND UPHOLD THE CHARGE but waive the fine in the interest of justice.

The motion passed with the following vote: AYES: ALL NOES: NONE

**7.2. Administrative Citation Nos.: 22063 and 22065:** Appellant: Shuying Xu, 2805 Rainer Way, Antelope, CA 95843 • Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.10.220(H), Client Service Records First and Second Offenses

**D. Panel Discussion and Decision:** The panel discussed the evidence and testimony presented for Administrative Citation Numbers 22063 and 22065. In regard to Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.10.220(H), Client Service Records, First and Second Offenses, a motion was made by Charles Sandoval and seconded by Robert Schmitt to deny the appeal and uphold the citations because the City/Complainant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the violations occurred and that the appellant is the responsible party.

The motion passed with the following vote: AYES: ALL NOES: NONE

**8. ADJOURNMENT** A motion was made by Robert Schmitt and seconded by Charles Sandoval to adjourn the hearing.

AYES: ALL NOES: NONE

Chairperson Sharon Lawin adjourned the March 10, 2026 hearing at 9:55 a.m.

Lynda Risucci Board Secretary