Regular City Council Meeting (RDA Successor/LPF)

MINUTES CITY OF LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY Regular Meeting April 23, 2024 OPEN SESSION MEETING The meeting was conducted in person at City Hall, 600 6 th Street, Lincoln, CA, and virtually on Zoom with a Live Stream on the City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18. 1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Karleskint at 6:00 PM. 2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Holly Andreatta Ben Brown Paul Joiner William Lauritsen Mayor Dan Karleskint Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 member absent, 0 members excused. Staff members present: Sean Scully, City Manager Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief Jennifer Brown, Chief Innovation & Technology Officer Vin Cay, City Engineer Erin Frye, Economic Development & Communications Matt Medill, Public Works Director Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk Nita Wracker, Finance Director Various City employees, consultants, and members of the public were also present in person and via teleconference. 3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION – Due to unforeseen circumstances, the meeting was unable to convene. 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Led by Councilmember Joiner. 5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS – Sean Scully, City Manager, requested that item10.D, be moved to a future date at the request of the applicant. 6. PRESENTATIONS 6.A. California Business Roundtable (CBRT) Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act. Charles Anderson, the Regional Public Affairs Manager for the Sacramento Valley Division League of California Cities, provided a powerpoint presentation detailing the historical background on the League of California Cities and its mission and the proposed CBRT Measure, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. The measure reduces state and local government funding by billions annually, upends local government tax and fee authority, and could open the door to countless lawsuits against cities and threatens local control. Councilmember Andretta asked what is the league doing to put pressure to oppose this measure? Charles Anderson responded, stating that the Sacramento Valley Division League of California

Page 2 of 7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2024 Cities, is meeting regularly to formulate the strategy, meeting with the media and engaging with member cities to bring forth this issue. Councilmember Andreatta asked for clarification on whether or not the measure will be on the ballot. Mr. Anderson responded, stating, the measure is expected to be on the ballot. Councilmember Andreatta asked if anyone has challenged the measure with the Attorney General, as the title is deceptive. Mr. Anderson responded, yes, there is an ongoing lawsuit, with a hearing in May, to review whether or not the title violates the States constitution. With no further comments, Mayor Karleskint, thanked Mr. Anderson for the presentation. Mr. Anderson sent emails regarding this item to the City Clerk the following day with additional information, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. 6.B. Website - meet your City Council members. Jennifer Brown, Chief Innovation and Technology Officer, led into the presentation by stating that, throughout the last seven years, the GIS team has developed tools to support staff with internal projects. Now, with the help of Papantzin Cid-Kochis, GIS Analyst II and her team, the focus now, is to over-haul and introduce public facing maps that will be interactive and usable on mobile devices. The new feature, called “Meet our City Council” allows residents to view city Councilmembers by district along with the ability to review the strategic plan, the mayoral rotation, along with Councilmember biographies. In addition, residents will be able to use the website to look up their specific councilmember based on their address. Council all expressed their gratitude for their project and for the ability to dig into data through multiple directions. Hearing no further comments from Council, Mayor Karleskint thanked Papantzin Cid-Kochis and team for their work. 7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL 1.) Debbie Gilchrist, a Lincoln resident, spoke in regards to comments made at the last City Council meeting pertaining to her ongoing case with code enforcement. 2.) Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, thanked City Councilmembers for attending the Woman’s Club 100-year anniversary on April 8th and distributed some promotional items, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. 3.) Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, referred to a quote about giving back to your community.

Page 3 of 7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2024 8. CONSENT Mayor Karleskint asked if any members of the City Council or staff would like to pull any items from the consent agenda. Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, asked to pull item 8.F and 8.H. Hearing no other comment, Mayor Karleskint called for a motion of the remainder of the consent agenda. Councilmember Andreatta motioned approval and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Brown. By the following Vote (Approved): Andreatta -Aye, Brown – Aye, Joiner- Aye, Lauritsen – Aye and Mayor Karleskint- Aye. The items approved were: 8.A. Approval of Minutes of March 7, 2024 Special; March 26, 2024 Regular; and April 9, 2024 Regular City Council meetings. (Gwen Scanlon) 8.B. Receive and File Treasurer's Report for the period ending March 31, 2024. (Nita Wracker) 8.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-067 adopting and approving an Investment Policy. (Nita Wracker) 8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-068 approving the revised Debt Management Policy. (Nita Wracker) 8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-069 approving Acquisition Funding Agreement for the Twelve Bridges, Village 27 Project Utilizing BOLD Program Financing. (Nita Wracker) 8.G . Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-071 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract for Services with W+P|19six (formerly Williams & Paddon) for architectural design services in the amount of $177,950, and approve a contingency of $25,000 for unforeseen items that may arise for the City Hall Reorganization Project (CIP 632). (Vin Cay) The Fiscal Year 2024/25 budget allocated $725,000 from Fund 243 – Community Services Administration PFE for professional services for the City Hall Reorganization Project: CIP 632. After the vote, Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk, stated Mike Garabedian had raised his hand. Mr. Garabedian asked to comment on Item 8E and City Clerk stated that item had already been acted on and requested he raise his hand on zoom prior to the item being acted upon. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA: 8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-070 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Complete Paperless Solutions for the implementation of a Laserfiche document management system and conversion of current records in an amount not to exceed $96,625. Mayor Karleskint asked Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, and who pulled the item, what kind of question he had pertaining to item 8.F. Mr. Chapman expressed concern with how the City retrieves archival information, how the data is safe guarded and how will this assist the public in accessing records? Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk, stated that routine items, such as resolutions, ordinances, staff reports and other commonly requested public items will be accessible on our website. From a technology perspective, Jennifer Brown, the Chief Innovation and Technology Officer (CITO), stated that the City has multiple ways to back up the data and that all documents are scanned into the system. The system we have been using, SIRE, is obsolete.

Page 4 of 7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2024 Sean Scully, City Manager, stated that it can be frustrating to locate documents, or know exactly what you are looking for; however, this project will enable the search for documents to be user friendly. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Karleskint called for a motion of RESOLUTION 2024-070. Councilmember Andreatta motioned approval and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Andreatta -Aye, Joiner- Aye, Brown – Aye, Lauritsen – Aye and Mayor Karleskint- Aye. 8.H. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-072 waiving the rental fee for Beermann Plaza for the Lincoln Chamber of Commerce and the Placer County Vintners Association, a 501c6 non-profit corporation, to utilize the space for an event series. Mayor Karleskint asked Bryon Chapman, a Lincoln resident, if he had a question or concern pertaining to this item. 1.) Mr. Chapman, a Lincoln resident, stated he was concerned that waiving the fee for one group, but not for another could raise issues and or create conflict and was concerned with the message to youth since this event included alcohol. Sean Scully, City Manager, stated that this request was reasonable, as the hope is to bring people downtown on a limited basis to promote downtown businesses while showcasing the local wineries. Councilmember discussion ensued. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Karleskint called for a motion of RESOLUTION 2024-072 Councilmember Andreatta motioned approval and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Joiner. By the following Vote (Approved): Andreatta -Aye, Joiner- Aye, Brown – Aye, Lauritsen – Aye and Mayor Karleskint- Aye. Councilmember Joiner left Council Chambers at 7:03 p.m. and returned at 7:05 p.m. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. (1) Conduct a public hearing; and (2) Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-073 to adopt the proposed Addendum to the certified 2010 Village 7 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Liberty at Lincoln Project (SCH# 2005062001) certifying that the changes will not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new impacts, new mitigation measures, new or revised alternatives, or an increase in the severity of previously identified impacts that would require major revisions to the 2010 Village 7 Specific Plan EIR, and therefore, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required; (3) Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-074 approving the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment; and (4) Waive full reading and introduce by title only ORDINANCE 1079B approving amendments to the Village 7 General Development Plan. Mikaela Noble, Assistant Planner, stated, prior to getting into the addendum details, that due to technical errors, chapter 5 in the Village 7 Specific Plan was omitted; however, Council was provided with the information on April 22nd and referenced a memorandum dated April 22, 2024, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof along with the corrected document. Ms. Noble

Page 5 of 7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2024 gave a powerpoint presentation, also made a part of these minutes by mention thereof which provided background on the project, which has been approved by the U.S Army Corp of Engineers, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, CA Dept. of Water Resources, and the CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife. The plan also incorporated updated land uses which represents current and anticipated future residential market needs and will reduce future maintenance cost for the City. Ms. Noble then turned the presentation over to Kevin Valente from Raney Planning & Management, Inc., who stated that the proposed changes would not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new environmental impacts, new mitigation measures, new or revised alternatives, or an increase of the severity of previously identified impacts that would require major revisions to the original 2010 certified Village 7 Specific Plan EIR. Mayor Karleskint opened public hearing at 7:09 p.m. with the following comment: 1.) Mike Garabedian, a resident, expressed concern with housing near a sewer plant, and community service district funding. Sean Scully, City Manager, stated, regarding the BOLD financing and or community service district funding question, the backbone infrastructure will be funded by BOLD programs, which will include sewer and water, and may include school facilities as well. In regards to housing near a waste water treatment plant, we have very strict odor guidelines, and often times, in urban areas, housing is often times close to those facilities. Mikaela Noble, Assistant Planner, stated, that planning has created a buffer on the west end with open space. Mayor Karleskint closed public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Councilmember Joiner stated that the evolution of the project has been interesting to watch. In addition, Councilmember Joiner, expressed concern with commercial space going away; however, the minor changes are better for the surrounding communities. Councilmember Brown echoed Councilmember Joiners concerns. Councilmember discussion ensued. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Karleskint called for a motion. Councilmember Joiner motioned approval of items RESOLUTION 2024-073, RESOLUTION 2024- 074 and ORDINANCE 1079B and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Brown By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner- Aye, Brown -Aye, Andreatta – Aye, Lauristen – Aye, and Mayor Karleskint- Aye. 10. GENERAL BUSINESS 10.A. Police Department Update Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, shared department accomplishments, a look at projects that are on the horizon, creating a specialized resource team, bring on a public safety therapy dog program amongst other priorities, as presented during the Council meeting. The PowerPoint is made apart of these minutes by a mention thereof. Councilmember Andreatta congratulated Chief Alves and his team for being recognized as the 7th safest City in California and number 1 in Northern California.

Page 6 of 7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2024 Councilmember Brown echoed Councilmember Andreatta sentiment and also expressed excitement for the therapy dog program. Councilmember Andreatta asked if Chief Alves has chosen the officers who will join the SWAT program. Chief Alves responded that he is moving forward with the project but there is a slim pool of candidates Councilmember Joiner expressed gratitude and appreciation for the police departments efforts. Councilmember Brown left Council Chambers at 7:56 p.m. and returned at 7:59 p.m. 10.B. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-075 authorizing a budget augmentation to revenue and the transfer of funds from the 12 Bridges Assessment District (Fund 865) to PFE-Transportation (Fund 240) for the repayment of roadway improvements. Nita Wracker, Finance Director, stated the report is related to the final clean-up for the 12 bridges bond funds that were incorrectly allocated; therefore, the current finance team is correcting the mistakes that were made in the past. Hearing no comments or questions from Council, Mayor Karleskint asked if any members of the public had any questions. 1.) Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, asked for clarification on how the funds were used. Nita Wracker, Finance Director, stated that when the Twelve Bridges Development was constructed, a bond was used to pay for infrastructure, but the expenses were incorrectly paid for out of other funds. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Karleskint called for a motion. Councilmember Andreatta motioned approval of item RESOLUTION 2024-075 and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Brown By the following Vote (Approved): Andreatta – Aye, Brown -Aye, Joiner- Aye, Lauristen – Aye, and Mayor Karleskint- Aye. 10.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-076 authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Limited Term Property Tax Increment Agreement between the County of Placer and the City of Lincoln as to Tax Rates Areas 003-002, 0003-007, 003-017, and 003-020. Sean Scully, City Manager, provided background on the item, stating that back in January of 2019 discussions began with the City of Lincoln and Placer County officials to work out a limited term tax sharing agreement with the intent of temporarily shifting the bulk of the property tax revenues to the City for the purpose of public safety staffing. Council had deliberated on placing a sales tax measure on the November 2024 ballot, but instead decided to ask the County to consider an amendment to the tax sharing agreement wherein certain terms were changed to allow the City to receive more of the available tax increment and to provide additional time to strategically decide when to consider a future revenue initiative for voter consideration, such as in 2026 and/or 2028. Council thanked Sean Scully, City Manager and Nita Wracker, Finance Director for their work on this agreement and thanked Placer County for collaborating.

Page 7 of 7 City Council, Public Finance Authority and Redevelopment Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes April 23, 2024 Mayor Karleskint asked if any one from the public would like to comment on the item. 1.) Bryon Chapman, a Lincoln resident, suggested that the City will need to continue to think about the future. 2.) Mike Garabedian, a resident, expressed concern with transportation tax and encourage City Council to pursue a sales tax measure now rather than in the future. Hearing no further comments, Mayor Karleskint asked for a motion. Councilmember Brown motioned approval of item RESOLUTION 2024-076 and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Andreatta By the following Vote (Approved): Brown -Aye, Andreatta – Aye, Joiner- Aye, Lauristen – Aye, and Mayor Karleskint- Aye. 11. CITY MANAGER REPORTS – 1.) The City of Lincoln has been ranked No. 7 on the SafeWise Safest Cities report. This is a testament to our community's commitment to safety and well-being. 2.) Nita Wracker has been appointed to the Assistant City Manager position. 3.) April 20th , the “Big Dill” pickleball ribbon cutting event was held at McBean Park. 12. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS – None. 13. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1.) Councilmember Andreatta attended the Placer County Economic Development Committee which chose to focus on making small businesses in our county and city successful. The WPWMA board hired a general manager and is slated to begin in June. 2.) Mayor Joiner: Attended the SACOG board of directors, no action items related to the City of Lincoln. 15. INFORMATION ITEMS 1.) Councilmember Andreatta: Invited all to attend the Placer County Law Enforcement Chaplain Academy on May 10th at the Rocklin Police Department, as Councilmember Andreatta will be graduating from the academy. 16. ADJOURNMENT- adjourned by Mayor Karleskint at 8:40 p.m. Submitted by Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act of 2024 April 23, 2024 Charles Anderson Regional Public Affairs Manager, Sacramento Valley Division Ad Paid for by Protecting Local Democracy and Vital Services, a Committee Opposed to Initiative 1935 Sponsored by the League of California Cities. Ad Committee’s Top Funder: League of California Cities

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Protecting and Enhancing Local Control is at the Core of Cal Cities Mission • Since 1898, Cal Cities has fought to protect and enhance local control. • Over the past decade, Cal Cities has secured hundreds of significant victories for its members. • Cal Cities harnesses the voice and collective power of its 476 member cities, representing thousands of city officials and the millions of California residents they serve.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Cal Cities is Membership Driven • Cal Cities’ policy positions are entirely driven by members – city officials just like you. • Cal Cities recognizes that constantly listening and learning is essential to ensure representation of the diverse interests of our membership while protecting local control. • Together, we will ensure that Cal Cities continues to deliver.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Cal Cities Resources & Opportunities to Participate • 16 Regional Divisions: The Sacramento Valley Division represents 59 cities and is led by its own 14-member Board. The 2023-24 President is Porsche Middleton, Council Member, Citrus Heights and its 2 nd Vice President is Lincoln Mayor Pro Tem, Holly Andreatta . • 10 Professional Departments: City Attorneys; City Clerks; City Managers; Fire Chiefs; Fiscal Officers; Mayors and Council Members; Personnel and Employee Relations; Planning and Community Development; Public Works Directors • 5 Diversity Caucuses: African American Caucus; Asian Pacific Islander Caucus; Latino Caucus; LGBTQ Caucus; Women’s Caucus • 7 Policy Committees: Community Services; Environmental Quality; Governance, Transparency and Labor Relations; Housing Community and Economic Development; Public Safety; Revenue and Taxation; Transportation, Communications and Public Works

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act of 2024 – Background  Proponent: California Business Roundtable (CBRT)  Comprised of major corporations including developers, oil, insurance, pharmaceutical companies and more.  Eligible for November 2024 statewide ballot.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Overview of Measure Significantly threatens local control.  Reduces state and local government funding by billions annually.  Upends local government tax and fee authority.  Opens the door to countless lawsuits against cities.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Fiscal Impact: Cal Cities Analysis  Over $20 billion of local government revenues over 10 years at risk.  $2 billion each year from fees and charges adopted after January 1, 2022, at risk.  Hundreds of millions of dollars of annual revenues from tax and bond measures approved by voters after January 1, 2022, cancelled.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Threatens Local Control  Taxes and fees adopted after January 1, 2022, that do not comply with the new rules are void.  More difficult for voters to approve funding for local services.  All future taxes must contain a sunset.  Measures passed after January 1, 2022 without sunset will be repealed.  General tax measures will also require the phrase “for general government use” on the ballot.  City charters may not be amended to include a tax or fee.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations • Colfax Measure B, TOT, 2% to 10%, Revenue of $ 29,000 Passed with 73.5% • Rocklin Measure F, TOT, 2% to 10%, Revenue of $ 300,000 Pass with 59.8% • Roseville Measure C TOT, 2% to 10% Revenue of $ 3,000,000 Passed with 73.0%

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Threatens Local Control  All fee increases need to be approved by two-thirds of local legislative body.  Fees and charges may not exceed the “actual cost” of providing service.  “Actual cost” defined as the “minimum amount necessary”  Fees and charges for corporations to use or lease government property can no longer be market-based.

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Threatens Local Control  Rate schedule revisions and regular adjustments to city fees and charges subject to higher passage thresholds and potential voter approval. Examples of Impacted Fees and Charges o Property development application processing fees o Plan review o Gas and electricity service charges o Parks and Recreation classes and lessons o Child care services o Jail booking fees o Copies of police reports o Emergency services fee o Building permit fees o Sales tax audits o Abatement of weeds on private property o Conducting inspections of rental housing o Fire inspections o Fines and penalties for administrative Code enforcement o Charges for specific health care services o Lease of city museum to non-profit organization o Use of Council Chambers by private groups o Use/lease of city-owned convention center o Use/lease of city-owned park or other recreation area o Charges imposed as a condition of property development

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org Groups Opposed to Measure  League of California Cities  California Fire Chiefs Association  Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) • California Municipal Utilities Association ( CMUA)  California State Association of Counties (CSAC)  California Special Districts Association (CSDA)  School Board Association  (And 250+ individual cities, counties and districts

Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education @calcities @calcities @calcities.org THANK YOU Charles Anderson Regional Public Affairs Manager Sacramento Valley Division canderson@calcities.org • (916) 798-2231 Ad Paid for by Protecting Local Democracy and Vital Services, a Committee Opposed to Initiative 1935 Sponsored by the League of California Cities. Ad Committee’s Top Funder: League of California Cities

From: Charles Anderson To: Gwendolyn Scanlon Subject: RE: Follow-up from last night"s council meeting Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 1:17:15 PM Attachments: image001.png I should add to avoid confusion, that the initiative number 1935, I believe, is just the sequential order of eligible initiative measures. The number it has on the ballot will be different since ballot propositions are numbered 1-99. From: Charles Anderson Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 12:59 PM To: Gwen Scanlon (City Clerk) <gwen.scanlon@lincolnca.gov> Subject: Follow-up from last night's council meeting Good afternoon, Gwen. Am I able to add additional information to the minutes for last night’s meeting? Mayor Pro Tem Holly Andreatta seemed concerned about the title and asked if it could be changed, and I said the ballot title and summary are set but I think additional clarification is needed. The proponents title, the Tax Payer Protection and Government Accountability Act of 2024 is what the change to the constitution will be known as if the initiative passes. However, this is not the title of the ballot measure that will be seen on the ballot. The ballot measure will look like this: 1935. (21-0042A1) LIMITS ABILITY OF VOTERS AND STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO RAISE REVENUES FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. For new or increased state taxes currently enacted by two-thirds vote of Legislature, also requires statewide election and majority voter approval. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter- proposed local special taxes by raising vote requirement to two-thirds. Eliminates voters’ ability to advise how to spend revenues from proposed general tax on same ballot as the proposed tax. Expands definition of “taxes” to include certain regulatory fees, broadening application of tax approval requirements. Requires Legislature or local governing body set certain other fees. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Lower annual state and local revenues, potentially substantially lower, depending on future actions of the Legislature, local governing bodies, voters, and the courts. (21-0042A1) I think Holly will find this title more appealing. Also, she asked if the measure could be withdrawn. I said something similar to I think they could withdraw it but I hadn’t seen anything to indicate they would. I think it would be helpful for the council and public to know that CBRT has until before June 27, 2024 to withdraw the measure. This is the date that the measure will be considered “Qualified for the ballot” by the Secretary of State.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Currently, the measure is considered eligible for the ballot and all eligible measures are waiting for the qualification date. Charles Anderson Regional Public Affairs Manager, Sacramento Valley Division League of California Cities Cell: 916-798-2231 canderson@calcities.org| www.calcities.org Strengthening California Cities through Advocacy and Education Twitter │ Facebook │ YouTube │ LinkedIn

MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Mikaela Noble, Assistant Planner DATE: April 22, 2024 RE: Agenda Item 9A: Village 7 Specific Plan and General Development Plan Amendments City Council Staff Report Errata Further review of the project information in the above referenced item identified a minor administrative error. Specifically, the current Draft Village 7 General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment (clean version) – which is attached as Exhibit3B – does not include Chapter 5. Previous submittals included this chapter, so it has been thoroughly reviewed by City staff; however, aformatting error occurred and Chapter 5 wasinadvertently omitted. Chapter 5 describes the design guidelines for residential areas in Village 7. The applicant is not proposing to amend any textual details in thischapter; however, edits were made regarding general formatting. The edits in this chapter are not significant to the project application. Attachment 5 in the staff report (GDP redlined version) includes Chapter 5 in the linked document. Attachments: 1. Draft Village 7 General Development Plan: Chapter 5

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

City of Lincoln 5-1 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.1 Overview This section contains the design guidelines for the residential neighborhoods and builds upon the Land Use Regulatory Guide in Section 3. Where Section 3 of this General Development Plan focuses on the physical design of neighborhoods, these guidelines focus on the design of homes within them. It provides guidance for home siting and orientation, design quality, and architectural style characteristics. These guidelines are organized into the following sub-sections. 1 Home Siting, Orientation, and Design Variation 2 Residential Design Elements 3 Architectural Style Characteristics The Residential Design Guidelines are to be applied in conjunction with the residential development standards in Section 4. Together, these sections provide the regulatory framework and design guidance necessary to create residential neighborhoods that are consistent with the design principles outlined in the Regulatory Guide. The guidelines are not to be applied as strict standards. Instead, they should be interpreted with flexibility, recognizing that a modern implementation of the traditional design elements outlined in this section is anticipated. This will allow home designs to respond to market conditions, development patterns, and/or new information that was not available when this GDP was approved by the City. While flexibility is needed, proper implementation of these guidelines, in tandem with the Regulatory Guide and Development Standards in Sections 3 and 4, is important to create neighborhoods that achieve the vision for the community.

5-2 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.2 Siting, Orientation & Design Variation Guidelines Porches and other visual cues instinctively separate the public and private realm. Lane loaded homes “front” on to residential streets to engage the public realm and include rear lanes with through-access for automobiles. Garage lanes open on to adjacent residential streets providing view corridors through neighborhoods. Where the Land Use Regulatory Guide provides design principles for each neighborhood’s development pattern, including the creation of lots and blocks, this sub-section provides the guidelines for the siting and orientation of homes on each lot, as well as the variety of architectural expressions expected of each neighborhood. This is important to ensure that homes will appropriately address the street and define the edge of the public realm and will have sufficient variety in design and character to create a traditional, “built over time” appearance. The following guidelines should be used to direct the plotting, layout, orientation, and dispersion of home designs within each village residential neighborhood: 5.2.1 Site Planning & Home Orientation 1 Residential lots should be designed to allow for home designs with indoor and outdoor living spaces oriented to the street, which de- emphasize the appearance of garages, such that the active spaces of a home are engaged with the streetscape. 2 Porches, low fences or walls, landscaping, or other features should be incorporated into home design in order to create a visual distinction between the public and private realm. 3 As provided for in the Regulatory Guide, where homes are located along a neighborhood edge street, where privacy, security and/or noise attenuation are not concerns, homes should “front” on to these streets rather than back up to them. These homes should have architectural elements such as doors, windows, and porches that are visually engaged with the public realm. 4 Homes should include design features, such as front doors, fenestration, and porches that are oriented to the front/street side of the home, to promote “eyes on the street” neighborhood watch. 5 As provided for in Section 5.3, homes located on corner lots or along neighborhood edge streets (such as the Central Boulevard) should have enhanced architectural treatments on elevations facing a public street. 6 Where live-end cul-de-sacs or garage lanes terminate adjacent to a neighborhood edge street (such as the Central Boulevard), homes should be plotted such that the cul-de- sac/garage lane creates a view corridor from the edge street into the neighborhood. In these instances, the homes located at the end of a cul-de-sac or garage lane should incorporate design elements (front doors, porches, fenestration) that front on to the collector street and engage the public realm.

City of Lincoln 5-3 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.2.2 Design Variation 1 The collection of homes in each village residential neighborhood should incorporate several architectural expressions, using a variety of floor plans, building forms, roof designs, materials, colors, garage orientations, outdoor living spaces, and architectural detailing. 2 Homes should be plotted in a manner that disperses a variety of home designs on each block, which collectively, create variety in scale and massing along the streetscape. 3 Each neighborhood shall have a minimum of three floor plans for each single-family housing type and include a minimum of three exterior elevations for each floor plan. 4 No more than two dwelling units with the same floor plan shall be plotted adjacent to one another along a street frontage. Where this plotting condition occurs, the floor plans should be reversed and each home should have a different exterior design, unique with respect to its elevation, roof forms, detailing, and color scheme. . . A variety of home designs and architectural expressions create an interesting streetscape and edge to the public realm. Garage lanes can create cross connectivity and view corridors through neighborhoods.

5-4 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3 Residential Design Elements The design guidelines in this sub-section articulate the architectural quality expected of homes constructed in the community. Regardless of each home’s architectural stye, there are several important elements that should be considered in home design, which include building massing, roof forms, entries, windows, and exterior finishes. The intent of this guidance is to ensure that home design helps build the community’s sense of identity, provides visually interesting streetscapes, and prevents the resulting neighborhood from appearing monotonous and sterile. By engaging living spaces with the public street, carefully siting and orienting garages, and encouraging a variety of architectural details and exterior finishes, the backdrop of homes that visually define the public realm of each neighborhood will create a sense of permanence and establish a strong community identity. The design elements addressed in this section should be used to guide the design of single and multi-family homes. The guidelines should be interpreted with flexibility, allowing home design to respond to the context of the surrounding neighborhood, lot sizes, and applicable development standards. Also, the guidelines should be used in a manner that allows individual home design to adapt to the style characteristics provided in Section 5.4. A variety of home designs and architectural expressions create an interesting streetscape and edge to the public realm.

City of Lincoln 5-5 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3.1 Scale, Massing, and Façade Articulation Encouraged The proper design of a home’s physical form, its massing and scale, is essential in creating neighborhoods that have a high-quality appearance. To ensure that homes possess a strong foundation for good design, several basic elements should be employed to ensure that the overall form, scale, and appearance of homes in each neighborhood create an environment that is comfortable for residents to walk, bike, and recreate. To achieve this intent, the following guidelines should be employed. Breaking up the form and massing of homes with variations in building height, bulk, shape, and footprint, with offset wall planes on each façade. Two-story homes should incorporate one- story elements along the front street-side and rear facades to break up massing and provide visual relief. Also, see Corner Lot Guidelines on pg. 5-6. Articulating building mass with a variety of building orientations, roof forms, and one-story elements. Providing stylistic diversity using a mix of plan forms and elevations, and a variety of exterior finish materials. See Section 5.2 for additional guidelines regarding creating architectural variety through each residential neighborhood. Integrating a combination of single and multiple-story elements into each neighborhood to create a varied streetscape skyline. Using massing techniques that create a series of “building blocks” such that each home’s outer form has a complex and interesting shape.

5-6 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 Not Permitted Building footprints with a basic rectangle or “L- shaped” garage-forward house design. Unarticulated massing that results in a box-like building form. Repeated building forms that create visual monotony along the streetscape. Homes that have repetitious flat wall planes, similar building profiles, and similar ridge heights.

City of Lincoln 5-7 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3.2 Corner Lots and Neighborhood Perimeter Edges Encouraged The architectural treatment of homes located on corner lots and neighborhood edges requires special consideration to ensure that the visual character of the neighborhood is upheld. Wherever the facade of a home fronts along a street, its appearance influences the visual character of the streetscape. Therefore, any street-facing facade of a home located on a corner lot or neighborhood perimeter street should be treated as a primary facade that incorporates enhanced architectural treatments. For these conditions, the following guidelines should be used to direct home design. Adding enhanced architectural elements to any home elevation that faces the street including the following. A variety of window treatments including, but not limited to, window surrounds, trim, and multi-paned glass. A variety of hipped and gabled roof forms. Exterior façade details such as accent materials, color juxtaposition, and other architectural elements appropriate to a home’s individual style; and Changes in wall planes between first and second floors (as appropriate). Enhancing corner lot units so that the elevations facing the street are treated as primary elevations. This includes articulated building mass, wrap around porches, single story elements, and detail elements specific to the architectural style of the home. Making home plans easily adaptable to include elements such as wrap- around porches, bay windows, or pop- outside gables.

5-8 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 Not Permitted Windows that lack trim elements and/or do not have the same design appearance as those on the front/primary building elevation. Blank walls with no windows or other architectural enhancements that face a public street or park. Large wall planes with no breaks between first and second story elements, and/ or with no changes in building massing.

City of Lincoln 5-9 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3.3 Roof Forms Encouraged Roof forms are important elements of both home and neighborhood design and should have a high-quality appearance and provide variety along neighborhood streetscapes. Careful consideration must be given to roof lines, ridge heights, roof forms, materials, and colors. To accomplish this intent, the following guidelines should be employed. Varying roof forms within each neighborhood, specific to each home’s architectural style, with changes in massing, pitch, and direction. Using distinctive roof materials and colors on each home, that collectively create enough variety and avoids creating monotone-colored appearance along the street’s skyline. Ensuring that all elements of roof design are appropriate to a home’s architectural style, with several different roof forms, planes, ridge heights, design features (gables, hips, dormers, etc.) that break up the mass of the roof and add to the home’s architectural quality Varying the height of ridgelines and facias. Using roof materials with substantial, three- dimensional definition and create deep shadow lines along the roof plane. Specifying roof colors that are harmonious with the color palette of each house. .

5-10 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 Not Permitted Roof materials that are flat and create no shadow relief along the roof plane. Repetitious gable ends, framed side to side on rear elevations. Repeated roof forms and/or designs that create a monotonous streetscape, such that all houses appear to have a similar or same roof design. Homes that all utilize the same roof materials and colors throughout the neighborhood.

City of Lincoln 5-11 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3.4 Entries Encouraged A home’s primary entrance is an important element that influences the character of a neighborhood streetscape. It visually activates a home and engages it with the public realm. As such, a home’s primary entrance, its “front door,” should be articulated as the main focal element of its street-facing elevation. This is achieved through the appropriate use of several design elements, which are outlined below and should be used to guide the design and orientation of each home’s entry. Using roof elements, columns, porticos, recesses or projections, windows or other architectural features that “announce” a home’s primary entrance. Articulating entryways with porches or courtyards, where design is appropriate. Orienting entryways to the front/street side of the house, and side street on corner units.

5-12 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 Not Permitted Primary entrances that face a side yard, unless located on a corner lot or a paseo. Front doors that are hidden behind garage doors and/or are not visible from the street.

City of Lincoln 5-13 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3.5 Porches and Balconies Encouraged Porches and balconies add a visually-pleasing, pedestrian-scaled element to a streetscape edge, which brings outdoor living spaces to the front yard and promotes social interaction among neighborhood residents. These features also provide visual relief to the building mass. As such, porches and balconies are encouraged to promote social activity within the neighborhoods. When porches are incorporated into home design, these guidelines should be followed. Covering porches with distinct roof forms that articulate the massing of the house, and utilizing wrap-around porches on corner lots, or lots adjacent to open areas. Raising porches a minimum of 2-feet from the adjacent sidewalk elevation to create a visual separation between the public and private realm, and to provide a sense of security for homeowners. Designing porches as an integral element of the building, with details, eaves, supports, and railings that are harmonious with the architecture of the home. Designing porches to be at least 6’-deep and 10’-wide so there is sufficient area for outdoor furniture.

5-14 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 Not Permitted Porches that do not wrap around the side of the house (on corner lots, where appropriate). Porches that are less than 6’-deep. Porches or balconies that appear “tacked on” or that lack architectural design elements evident in the home. 5.3.5 Porches and Balconies, continued Encouraged Using a variety of balcony designs, covered or open, and either recessed into the mass of the building or as a cantilevered element to match architectural style. Adding decorative balconies to articulate and provide visual relief on exterior facades.

City of Lincoln 5-15 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 5.3.6 Window Treatments Encouraged Window location is determined both by the practical considerations of interior views and privacy, as well as exterior home design. To ensure that windows have a high-quality architectural appearance, the following guidelines should be implemented. Including decorative trim elements on windows located on the sides and rear of homes, especially on elevations that face neighborhood edge streets and open space areas. Adding trim elements that are appropriate to the architecture of the home and that enhance its appearance and provide shadow relief along each building elevation, including the following. Decorative or bracketed window heads. Full trim surrounds. Fabric awnings or awning shutters; Decorative shutters. Detailed sill plates; or Window boxes and flowerpot shelves. Utilizing glass with no glazing (clear), or with lightly tinted, non-reflective glazing. Using windows with dark, anodized, painted aluminum, vinyl, or wood frames that are harmonious with the architecture an nd color palette of the home. Utilizing vertically oriented window forms, with multiple windows paired or ribboned (3 or more) together with a unifying trim surround. Including transom or clerestory windows in large wall planes, where appropriate to a home’s architecture. Recessing windows, when appropriate to home’s architectural style (trim surround not necessary). Using multi-paned windows where appropriate to architectural style.

5-16 City of Lincoln RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES February 2024 Not Permitted Windows without trim surrounds or architectural enhancements on heads or sills. Glass with dark or reflective glazing. Clear anodized or mill- finished aluminum window frames. Monochromatic treatment of window surrounds that ‘disappear’ into the building facade Clustered window forms that lack a unifying trim surround or bracketed window heads/sills

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 CITY OF LINCOLN 2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 Mayor Dan Karleskint Mayor Pro Tem Holly Andreatta Councilmember Benjamin Brown Councilmember Paul Joiner Councilmember William Lauritsen -COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA- 6:00 PM *****AMENDED AGENDA***** City Hall (Extremely Limited Seating Capacity) 3rd Floor Council Chambers 600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 or attend via ZOOM register by using this link: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_L1sVeRjjSwaygN5OEfk5ew or participate by calling US: +1 (669) 900-6833 use ID# 842 1355 6096 and use *9 to raise hand to speak Sent from my iPhone

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 - EXECUTIVE TEAM - Sean Scully, City Manager Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Nita Wracker, Asst. City Manager Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief Jennifer Brown, CITO (IT) Vin Cay, City Engineer Erin Frye, Econ. Dev. & Communication Spec. Kathryn Hunt, Library Manager Matthew Medill, Public Works Director Veronica Rodriguez, HR Director Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk Christian Svensk, Comm. Dev. Director MISSION STATEMENT: To prov ide the highest lev el of serv ice responsiv e to our com m unity ’s expectations and to enhance the quality of life and econom ic v itality . THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST WITH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Americans wit h Disabilit ies Act (ADA): In com pliance with the ADA, if y ou need special assistance to participate in this m eeting or other serv ices in conjunction with this m eeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (91 6) 43 4-2 490. The m eeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is av ailable. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the m eeting or tim e when serv ices are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangem ents can be m ade to prov ide accessibility to the m eeting or serv ice. Agenda Availabilit y : The m ain posting location of the City Council Agenda pursuant to the Brown Act, Gov ernm ent Code § 54954.2 (a) is on the public kiosk outside the entrance of City Hall, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, California. City Council Agenda Packets are av ailable for rev iew at the City Clerk’s Office, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, California, and “Liv e and Archiv ed” m eetings, m inutes and v ideos are av ailable on the City ’s website at www.Lincolnca.gov . City Council Meetings are telev ised liv e 6:00PM on Cable channel 1 8. Public Input : Persons wishing to address the City Council are asked to v oluntarily com plete and subm it a speaker card to City staff. Speaker cards are av ailable near the entrance of the m eeting location. Persons wishing to address the City Council on an item appearing on this agenda will be called upon at the appropriate tim e during the item ’s consideration. Persons wishing to address the City Council on an item not appearing on the agenda will be called upon during “Public Com m ent on Non-Agenda Item s.” In either case, please stand to be recognized by the May or when y our nam e is called. Please note: com m ents from the audience without com ing to the podium m ay be disregarded or ruled out of order. All speakers' tim e will be lim ited to three (3 ) m inutes, unless extended by the May or. All com m ents or questions should be addressed to the May or and in m ost cases, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but m ay engage in brief discussion, prov ide direction to City staff, or schedule item s for future m eetings. Special Meet ing Public Input : Only issues listed on a special m eeting agenda m ay be addressed pursuant to the Brown Act’s regulation of Special Meetings. Consent Agenda: All m atters on the Consent Agenda are considered routine business and will be enacted by one m otion. There will be no separate discussion of these item s unless a m em ber of the City Council or resident requests a specific item be rem ov ed from the Consent Agenda for separate action. Any item s rem ov ed will be considered after the rem ainder of the Consent Agenda. Judicial Review: Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without lim itation, California Gov ernm ent Code § 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code § 2 1 1 7 7 , if y ou wish to challenge in court any of the decisions m ade by the City Council, including any action regarding planning, zoning or env ironm ental decisions, y ou m ay be lim ited to raising only those issues y ou or som eone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence deliv ered to the City at, or

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 prior to, the public hearing. - INVOCATION or INSPIRATION 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION (if any) 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS 6. PRESENTATIONS 6.A. California Business Roundtable (CBRT) Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act. (Charles Anderson, Regional Public Affairs Manager, Sacramento Valley Division League of California Cities) 6.B. Website - meet your City Council members. (Papantzin Cid-Kochis, GIS Analyst II) 6B Final.pdf

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL 8. CONSENT 8.A. Approval of Minutes of March 7, 2024 Special; March 26, 2024 Regular; and April 9, 2024 Regular City Council meetings. (Gwen Scanlon) 8A Final.pdf 8.B. Receive and File Treasurer's Report for the period ending March 31, 2024. (Nita Wracker) 8B Final.pdf 8.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-067 adopting and approving an Investment Policy. (Nita Wracker) 8C Final.pdf 8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-068 approving the revised Debt Management Policy. (Nita Wracker) 8D Final.pdf 8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-069 approving Acquisition Funding Agreement for the Twelve Bridges, Village 27 Project Utilizing BOLD Program Financing. (Nita Wracker) 8E Final.pdf 8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-070 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Complete Paperless Solutions for the implementation of a Laserfiche document management system and conversion of current records in an amount not to exceed $96,625. (Gwen Scanlon) The contract with Complete Paperless Solutions is included in the 2023-25 budgeted capital

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 improvement project (CIP-T242) and IT Professional Services; future annual maintenance/subscription will be budgeted annually as shown in the fiscal impact statement. 8F Final.pdf 8.G. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-071 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract for Services with W+P|19six (formerly Williams & Paddon) for architectural design services in the amount of $177,950, and approve a contingency of $25,000 for unforeseen items that may arise for the City Hall Reorganization Project (CIP 632). (Vin Cay) The Fiscal Year 2024/25 budget allocated $725,000 from Fund 243 – Community Services Administration PFE for professional services for the City Hall Reorganization Project: CIP 632. 8G Final.pdf 8.H. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-072 waiving the rental fee for Beermann Plaza for the Lincoln Chamber of Commerce and the Placer County Vintners Association, a 501c6 non-profit corporation, to utilize the space for an event series. (Erin Frye) 8H Final.pdf 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. (1) Conduct a public hearing; and (2) Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-073 to adopt the proposed Addendum to the certified 2010 Village 7 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Liberty at Lincoln Project (SCH# 2005062001) certifying that the changes will not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new impacts, new mitigation measures, new or revised alternatives, or an increase in the severity of previously identified impacts that would require major revisions to the 2010 Village 7 Specific Plan EIR, and therefore, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required; (3) Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-074 approving the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment; and (4) Waive full reading and introduce by title only ORDINANCE 1079B approving amendments to the Village 7 General Development Plan (Mikaela Noble) 9A Final.pdf 10. GENERAL BUSINESS

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 10.A. Police Department Update (Chief Alves) 10A Final.pdf 10.B. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-075 authorizing a budget augmentation to revenue and the transfer of funds from the 12 Bridges Assessment District (Fund 865) to PFE-Transportation (Fund 240) for the repayment of roadway improvements. (Nita Wracker) 10B Final.pdf 10.C. Adopt RESOLUTION 2024-076 authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Limited Term Property Tax Increment Agreement between the County of Placer and the City of Lincoln as to Tax Rates Areas 003-002, 0003-007, 003-017, and 003-020. (Sean Scully) 10C Final.pdf 10.D. Consider adoption of RESOLUTION 2024-077 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Christina Company - Athens, LLC to sell 12.00 acre-feet of volumetric credits in the Lakeview Farms Retention Basin for $414,193.68 and a one-time payment of $207,802.97 for perpetual maintenance. (Vin Cay) 10D Final.TW.pdf 11. CITY MANAGER REPORTS 12. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS 13. COMMITTEE REPORTS 14. INFORMATION ITEMS

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 15. ADJOURNMENT

2024 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY April 23, 2024 NOTE: Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lincoln’s website at http://www.lincolnca.gov/ subject to staff’s availability to post the documents before the meeting. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the City will provide special assistance for disabled members of the public. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 434-2490. As a courtesy, please make every effort to inform the Clerk of your needs at least 24 hours prior to the meeting so the City may make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (including any action regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.