South Gate City Council

CITY OF SOUTH GATE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2026 CALL TO ORDER Joshua Barron, Mayor called a Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:52 p.m. INVOCATION Tina De La Rosa, Acting Director of Parks & Recreation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Yodit Glaze, City Clerk ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk PRESENT Mayor Joshua Barron, Vice Mayor Al Rios, Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos; and City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Raúl F. Salinas ABSENT/EXCUSED Council Member Gil Hurtado and Council Member Maria Davila PRESENTATION 1 BUDGET ADMIN The City Council approved items A, B, & C by motion of Vice Mayor Rios and seconded by Mayor Barron: a. Received the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Report and Adjustments; b. Approved the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Adjustments; and c. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-07-CC entitled A Resolution of the City of South Gate approving Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Amendments and Adjustments. ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes (voted no on items B and C); Vice Mayor Rios, yes; Mayor Barron, yes; Council Member Hurtado, excused; Council Member Davila, excused.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 2 of 26 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING Following the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council: a. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-08-CC entitled A Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, approving Substantial Amendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan; and Substantial Amendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan Reprogramming Community Development Block Grant (CDBG); b. Authorized the City Manager or the Community Development Director to initiate appropriate action necessary to implement projects and programs as noted in the FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan; and c. Reallocated $749,254 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and $340,000 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds from current activity allocations to the proposed budget amendments within each respective fund. Gabriel Perez, Director of Community Development, explained that this item concerns the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which are federal HUD funds allocated to the City annually. The City has discretion in programming these funds, and the City Council has previously reviewed the Annual Action Plan for this year’s allocation. Today’s item is a proposed substantial amendment needed to begin expending the funds. Mr. Perez noted that Ana Marie LeNoue, the City’s contracted program consultant, will present the details. Ana Marie LeNoue, President of Advanced Avant-Garde Corporation, delivered the presentation. Mr. Perez reported that the City is considering reallocating a portion of its CDBG funds for a demolition project involving the Housing Authority properties at 9001 and 9019 Long Beach Boulevard. The intent is to prepare the site for future sales and the development of fourteen affordable town homes by Habitat for Humanity. The project is currently undergoing environmental review and will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council at a later date. Mayor Barron asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on this item. Robyn Logan of Hunt Avenue inquired about the potential value of a townhome and its implications for property tax revenue for the city.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 3 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D Edgar Pelayo of Mallison Avenue asked for clarification on the rationale for reallocating funds to other projects and whether the same process is used during initial allocations. He stated that involving commissions and residents in these decisions would enhance transparency, accountability, and community trust by ensuring that information is clearly communicated. Jimmy Ozaeta, South Gate resident, provided a detailed report at the most recent City Council meeting. He noted that significant advocacy efforts have sought to reallocate approximately one million dollars from this funding to support Parks and Recreation programs. He also expressed concern that portions of the funding were reallocated due to ongoing timeliness issues. Mr. Ozaeta recommended reassessing the factors contributing to these delays and suggested directing the funds toward street and sidewalk improvements. EMAILS Mario Dominguez expressed concern that the $1.1 million and CDBG funds allocated in March 2025 for Parks and Recreation projects were not advanced prior to the former director’s retirement. He criticized city leadership and staff for what he considers inadequate oversight and accountability in ensuring the timely completion of projects intended to benefit residents. Having no one else come forward, Mayor Barron closed the audience portion. Councilwoman Avalos asked if the City of South Gate is currently in a workout plan with HUD. Ms. LeNoue replied in the affirmative. Councilwoman Avalos asked if the city has $2.2 million right now. Ms. LeNoue replied in the affirmative. Councilwoman Avalos stated that the CAC reviewed and allocated the funding. She recalled making the motion to allocate $50,000 to support small businesses when the item previously came before the Council. She noted that these funds appear to have been redirected despite small businesses continuing to face financial challenges due to recent ICE raids and current economic conditions. She requested that the funds remain allocated as originally approved and that the program be initiated. She also referenced the commercial façade program, noting that many businesses are interested in making improvements, but the city has

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 4 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D indicated these projects are not currently feasible. She requested that $200,000 remain allocated to the commercial façade program. She acknowledged that both the city’s sidewalks and roadways are in poor condition. Vice Mayor Rios noted that these are HUD funds used for various projects and asked whether the CAC had approved the recommendation. Ms. LeNoue stated that the new recommendations were presented to the CAC for feedback, and the committee accepted the presentation without offering any changes. Vice Mayor Rios requested clarification on the total funding required for the housing project. Mr. Perez stated that Habitat will request approximately $1.6 million in HOME funds from the City, with additional support anticipated through PHA funding. The estimated construction cost for the project is $11.8 million. Habitat has submitted its application, which will undergo review by the Planning Commission. The City Council will subsequently review the tentative tract map for the townhomes. Councilwoman Avalos inquired whether the city owns the property and whether it intends to provide funding to the developer for the project’s construction. Mr. Perez noted that while the City can provide HOME funds, any allocation would require future City Council approval. Vice Mayor Rios inquired about who will manage the housing project upon its completion and whether Habitat will assume responsibility. He also expressed interest in giving South Gate residents priority. Mr. Perez noted that limiting eligibility to South Gate residents presents certain challenges. Ms. LeNoue asked whether the question referred to which households may apply for the housing program. Eligibility is based on household income and is open to low-and-moderate income households, not limited to South Gate residents. Mayor Barron concurred with Councilwoman Avalos that addressing small business needs should remain a priority. He expressed concern regarding the façade improvement program, noting that property owners are the primary beneficiaries of such enhancements.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 5 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D Ms. LeNoue stated that while a tenant may request the funds, the property owner must authorize the improvements and provide access to the property. Mayor Barron noted that the city’s most significant success was the gift card program, which provided meaningful benefits to both local businesses and residents. Ms. LeNoue stated that HUD does not allow the use of gift cards for program purposes. Ms. LeNoue provided information regarding the small business assistance program. A business may qualify if it is located within a low-income census tract, which includes most of the city. Eligible uses of the funds include job creation or qualifying capital purchases. The City would need to determine the grant amount, and recipients would be required to provide documentation verifying that the funds were used for eligible expenses. This program could be implemented as described. Mayor Barron clarified that the funding could not be used to help businesses cover their operating expenses. Ms. LeNoue stated that if the business needed to purchase a refrigerator, the expense would qualify as capital purchase. Councilwoman Avalos asked whether those funds could be used to cover an employee’s salary. Ms. LeNoue confirmed that funding may be approved if the business can demonstrate a loss of revenue and show that the funds will be used to cover the employee’s salary. She noted that employment-based funding requires the employee to meet low-to-moderate income household criteria, which obligates the employer to collect extensive personal information. Based on her experience with similar programs, many employees are reluctant to provide the required documentation. Rob Houston, City Manager, explained that staff reviewed the proposed $50,000 small business program and identified several significant limitations. The previous gift card initiative was funded through ARPA, which allowed much greater flexibility, whereas CDBG funds are highly restricted. He noted that administering such a program would require dedicated staff to verify eligibility, track distributions, and review required financial documentation. The estimated administrative cost alone would be approximately $20,000, leaving only $30,000 for direct assistance.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 6 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D Mr. Houston added that determining which businesses qualify—and how to fairly allocate limited funds—would be challenging. For example, providing $1,000 per business would help only about 30 businesses, leaving many without support. Additionally, participation would require businesses to submit detailed financial records, such as tax information, which some may be unwilling to provide. Mayor Barron noted several of the revitalization grants and acknowledged that they are intended for substantial home improvement projects that enhance property value. He asked how the property could be demolished without delays and how to move the project forward. He noted that a resident raised a valid point about ensuring our quotes are obtained as accurately and efficiently as possible, given how quickly prices can change. Mr. Houston explained that Parks and Recreation staff identify projects and make every effort to advance them to the bidding stage. However, ongoing budget cuts and citywide hiring freeze have made it difficult to sustain project work, as vacant positions cannot be filled without additional revenue. As a result, these projects are being forwarded to Public Works Engineering, which has also experienced reductions in staff. Consequently, many city projects are expected to progress more slowly. Mr. Houston noted that the commercial rehabilitation program has been somewhat disappointing. Initially, the city intended to develop a strong plan to support businesses in improving their façades. Unlike previous approaches, where a single business could receive up to $100,000, the current proposal distributes funds along sections of Tweedy Boulevard, offering a maximum of $7,000–$10,000 per business with a required 50 percent match to ensure landlord participation. The project is currently on hold due to budget reductions and the loss of two code enforcement officers. Mayor Barron acknowledged the established process the City follows with its commissions. While commissioners provide recommendations on the use of funds, final decisions rest with the Council, which must deliberate and act in the best interest of the community. He emphasized the importance of communication and commended staff for their thorough presentation to the CAC. He also thanked staff for reporting that the CAC had no concerns, noting that the required 30-day review period has been concluded and the Council is now prepared to make its decision.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 7 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D Councilwoman Avalos moved to approve the item with the following amendments: allocate $100,000 to small businesses, $100,000 to the commercial façade program, $800,000 to city streets, and distribute the remaining funds as designated by staff. Mr. Houston asked whether the Council has identified any items they no longer wish to fund. Ms. LeNoue stated staff will need to pull funds from the current activity allocation line because the proposed changes totaled less than $800,000. Arturo Cervantes, Director of Public Works, noted that he welcomes additional funding for the city’s roadway projects. He explained that the recently received $750,000 must be spent within the next two to three months, and the department is working quickly to allocate those funds. However, adding another $800,000 at this time would not ensure the city’s ability to use the money effectively. Public Works is currently limited in staffing and resources, and additional street projects require engineering work before they can proceed. Mr. Cervantes stated he cannot commit to spending the additional $800,000 by the May deadline. The department is able to utilize the current $750,000 only because it is being applied to an existing street project already underway. He is uncertain how the department could responsibly spend the extra $800,000 within the required timeframe. Councilwoman Avalos asked whether any additional streets have been identified for restricting. Mr. Cervantes noted that while many city streets require investment, the improvement process involves several steps: identifying priority streets, hiring a consultant for design, soliciting bids, and ultimately completing construction. Councilwoman Avalos noted that one of the streets she had in mind runs parallel to Firestone, specifically Truba Avenue, which contains a small section of recently smoothed pavement. Mr. Cervantes noted that Truba presents a unique challenge. Designing the project to meet ADA requirements will take the city approximately six months. He added that the Frontage Road project required nearly a year to complete the full process and construction. Mr. Houston explained that there are essentially two timelines. The city has an immediate need this year to prepare projects for implementation, while the annual allocation process determines priorities for future funding. If a majority of the Council wishes to shift next year’s funding

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 8 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D emphasis, for example, placing greater priority on roadway improvements rather than specific project staff can adjust accordingly and bring revised recommendations to the CAC for the next funding cycle. He noted that this may involve re-evaluating or deferring some planned projects. However, he also emphasized that there are practical limits to how quickly the city can pivot, as outlined by the Public Works Director. Mayor Barron requested clarification, noting that the Truba project is already listed as a street identified for needed improvements. Mr. Cervantes responded that it is not. He explained that the city uses a pavement management system to prioritize street repairs over a five-year period. In the area referenced by the Councilwoman, all prioritized streets have already been addressed. Truba Avenue was not identified as a priority, and several other streets citywide rank higher for future investment. If additional funding were available, he would recommend allocating it to those higher-priority locations. Truba is not included in the near-term Capital Improvement Program. However, if the Council wishes to elevate it as a policy priority, the department would be prepared to proceed accordingly. Mayor Barron requested that the Council receive, at a future date, an explanation of the criteria used to determine street-prioritization decisions. Mr. Cervantes responded in the affirmative. The Councilwoman inquired about which other streets are eligible and ready for funding. Mr. Cervantes noted that the department has no additional street projects ready for implementation within the next three months. He added that the City’s Pavement Management System identifies more than $80 million in needed funding to address street repairs citywide. Mayor Barron asked whether it would be possible to schedule an off-site meeting for the Councilwoman to meet with the Public Works Department, review their processes, assess the streets included in the program, and receive a related presentation. Mr. Cervantes responded in the affirmative. Mayor Barron stated that all council should also receive the report. Councilwoman Avalos requested clarification regarding the $513,000 allocation in the current fiscal year’s budget.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 9 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D Ms. LeNoue stated that the amount presented totaled $758,990. Councilwoman Avalos asked when the funds must be spent. Ms. LeNoue responded within three months. The city is working to fully utilize the available funding in coordination with Public Works. The project is already underway, and the funding allocation is being increased from $513,000 to $758,000. Councilwoman Avalos asked whether the funds could be directed toward areas lacking sidewalks, in addition to the previously identified funding. Mr. Cervantes explained that the city faces more than twenty million dollars in needed sidewalk repairs. He noted that the process is lengthy, as Public Works must procure a designer, identify and survey the affected locations, develop the project plans, and issue the work for bid. Mr. Houston asked whether any of the proposed projects are unacceptable and should not be funded. If all projects are recommended, no additional funds would be available for reallocation. However, if some projects are deemed unsuitable, staff can evaluate how much funding could be redirected and whether it can be programmed elsewhere. He added that staff cannot meet the May deadline for sidewalk and street projects this year, but there will be significantly more opportunity to address these needs in next year’s allocation. Mr. Cervantes confirmed this. Mayor Barron noted that Councilwoman Avalos has requested the reallocation of one million dollars and asked Councilwoman Avalos to identify where those funds could be drawn from. Councilwoman Avalos responded that the funds would come from the 2.2 million. Vice Mayor Rios noted that since the city is unable to complete the sidewalk project, the remaining $400,000 allocations could potentially be used elsewhere. He emphasized that Truba is an important street, serving as a main thoroughfare, and pointed out that the surrounding streets on the west side have already been improved. Mr. Houston suggested revisiting the street improvement topic in the future, possibly with a presentation explaining the process for assessing road conditions and prioritizing repairs across different neighborhoods. However, these discussions cannot be included in this year’s CDBG funding due to time constraints. Staff are seeking direction soon, as

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 10 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D projects recommended for completion by May must remain feasible within the current timeline. Vice Mayor Rios inquired whether it would be feasible to complete the other two projects referenced for the $100,000 by May. Mr. Houston noted that while a small business program is possible, determining eligibility, restrictions, and administrative costs is complex. With limited staff and ongoing budget cuts and labor changes, he doubts the team can take on a new project or complete it by May. Councilwoman Avalos acknowledged that more time would have been helpful, but since allocations from July last year were not addressed, she proposes allocating $150,000 to small business and reducing the neighborhood revitalization grant program to $75,000. Vice Mayor Rios asked Ms. LeNoue whether that solution would be acceptable. Ms. LeNoue confirmed it is possible, but the requested funds for the neighborhood revitalization grant program are needed to process current applications. Transferring $75,000 would likely lead to cuts. Councilwoman Avalos announced a $75,000 addition to the neighborhood revitalization grant program. Ms. LeNoue asked from which project. Councilwoman Avalos commented from the demolition and clearance process. Ms. LeNoue asked if the plan was to cancel the demolition and clearance project. Councilwoman Avalos responded in the affirmative. Ms. LeNoue said the request is to transfer funds from demolition and clearance, adding $75,000 to the neighborhood revitalization grant and $150,000 to small business. Councilwoman Avalos responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Rios asked, "What does that look like?" Mr. Houston explained that moving forward with the Long Beach townhomes relies on obtaining the full $225,000 to remove the current

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 11 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D building; otherwise, it will remain due to a lack of alternative funding sources. He expressed doubts about quickly establishing a business program, administering it, collecting and reviewing financial data, and allocating grants within three months before funds expire. Luis Frausto, Director of Administrative Services, said building 14 properties will boost the city's property tax revenue. Though benefits won't appear immediately, planning ahead is key. The new properties, each worth at least $500,000, will strengthen the city's tax base. Councilwoman Avalos asked Ms. LeNoue if one employee is sufficient to run the small business program, and what the associated cost would be. Ms. LeNoue explained that her team manages small business programs for cities. They must develop guidelines, obtain council approval, which may take one to two months, and then implement the program. Key decisions include determining the funding amount for each business and establishing selection criteria. She has held discussions with the HUD representative, which have been beneficial for both the director and Ms. Averell, the Housing Manager. Additionally, the HUD representative is communicating on behalf of the city to the HUD Director, who is taking directives from the federation. Cities that have not spent all their allocated funds face significant challenges for various reasons. Until now, she had never encountered the possibility of losing future funding. Vice Mayor Rios acknowledged the value of the discussion and expressed appreciation for Councilwoman Avalos’ input and efforts to effect change. He noted that the matter concerns compliance and timeliness, and subsequently moved to adopt recommendation actions A, B, and C. Mayor Barron seconded the motion. Councilwoman Avalos inquired with Mr. Cervantes whether a demolition design plan is required. Mr. Cervantes said it often depends on the location, but in many instances, demolition does occur. Councilwoman Avalos inquired whether a design plan had been prepared for the demolition of the property. Mr. Cervantes does not have familiarity with the project. Could you please clarify what is being demolished? Ms. LeNoue states of an existing structure and then removing the soil.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 12 of 26 2 COMMUNITY DEV/ HOUSING CONT’D Mr. Cervantes inquired about the structure. Ms. LeNoue suggested that the Director of Community Development might be able to provide an explanation. Mr. Perez mentioned that the building has a base of approximately 200 square feet. Mr. Cervantes explained that the process begins by hiring a consultant to create a demolition package, which is necessary for bidding. He noted that this documentation takes time and that three months is a short period in the public sector. Councilwoman Avalos said the project cannot proceed. Mr. Houston indicated that every effort will be made to ensure the project's progress. He noted that there is as much likelihood of completing this project as those other programs which have yet to begin and will require further review. He also observed that this demolition has already undergone some level of review and procedural evaluation. Mr. Perez noted that Ms. Averell has reviewed the matter and a draft RFP is ready. He recommends proceeding, as we have ongoing obligations to secure and clean these properties. If we cannot sell or repurpose the property, expenses will continue. ROLL CALL: Councilwoman Avalos, no; Vice Mayor Rios, yes; Mayor Barron, yes; Council Member Hurtado, absent; Council Member Davila, absent. 3 PROPERTY USE ADMIN/PERMITS Following the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council approved items A, B, & C by motion of Vice Mayor Rios and seconded by Mayor Barron: ROLL CALL: Councilwoman Avalos, yes; Vice Mayor Rios, yes; Mayor Barron, yes; Council Member Hurtado, absent; Council Member Davila, absent. a. A finding that in accordance with CEQA, this project qualifies for a categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (Class 3), “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures,” and is thereby exempt from CEQA in that the subject property will continue to be used as a parking lot for a new drive-through restaurant;

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 13 of 26 3 PROPERTY USE ADMIN/PERMITS CONT’D b. Resolution No. 2026-09-CC entitled A Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, State of California, approving General Plan Amendment No. 25-01 for a property at 8915 Vossler Avenue; and c. Introduced Ordinance No. 2026-01-CC entitled An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of South Gate, State of California, approving Zone Change No. 25-01 for a property at 8915 Vossler Avenue. Gabriel Perez, Director of Community Development, stated that John Signo, Planning Manager, will be giving the presentation. John Signo, Planning Manager, gave the presentation. Mr. Houston noted that David Ghermezian, the property owner and developer, is available for questions and would also like to make a brief statement. Mayor Barron asked if anyone on the public would like to speak on this item and if any emails were received. Seeing no one coming up and not receiving any emails, Mayor Barron closed the audience portion. Mayor Barron asked Mr. Ghermezian to step up to the podium. Mr. Ghermezian has owned this property for approximately seven years. Throughout this period, the site has consistently operated as a restaurant, with the parking lot serving its patrons. The use of the property remains unchanged—the parking lot continues to support the development facing Firestone. Considerable thought has gone into designing the site. Councilwoman Avalos thanked Mr. Ghermezian and asked how soon construction would begin if approved, noting the property has been vacant for seven years. Mr. Ghermezian shared that previous city staff’s lack of understanding about the project, and the overlay zone caused him to lose tenants. However, the new staff have been supportive and provided helpful information. He is currently negotiating with tenants and hopes council will see a project within 12 months. Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer, raised a concern about the planning commission’s condition requiring 8915 Vossler to be attached to the restaurant parcel, preventing separate sale. This restriction suggests the lot can't operate independently under the new zoning and may indicate that the zoning change is tailored for the drive-thru project rather than city policy, as it removes a residential transition buffer for a single parcel.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 14 of 26 3 PROPERTY USE ADMIN/PERMITS CONT’D He is concerned that the proposal resembles spot zoning and questions why rezoning is necessary if the parking lot remains unchanged. Vice Mayor Rios expressed his appreciation to Mr. Ghermezian for attending the meeting. He stated that the purpose of the zoning change appears to be facilitating the acquisition of a tenant but sought clarification regarding the rationale behind the implementation of a CEQA guideline. Vice Mayor Rios noted limited parking behind the building and inquired about the total spaces planned for the project. Mr. Ghermezian responded: 11 spaces in the rear lot. Mr. Houston explained that the back parking lot has served the business for years but is zoned residential under corridor zoning. The Vice Mayor questioned this designation, and Mr. Perez or Mr. Signo can clarify the zoning details. The corridor zone is meant to complement both commercial and residential areas; if combined with a commercial business, it may be eligible for rezoning pending council approval. Mr. Perez can provide further information on this matter. Mr. Perez stated Mr. Signo may speak on this. Mr. Signo supports the City Manager's view. The property has served as a parking lot for decades, but it was zoned residential, which is not appropriate. With a new project underway, the general plan amendment and zone change will correct this. Linking the parking lot to restaurant properties ensures that if ownership changes, the restaurant retains its parking spaces. This protects the parking area for future use. Mayor Barron believes only two corridors have that zoning: Tweedy and Firestone. Mr. De La Paz asked if the city is spot zoning? Mr. Signo does not consider this to be spot zoning, as the adjacent properties along Firestone are UN zoned commercials. Vice Mayor Rios indicated that no adverse effects are anticipated. Mr. Signo stated that CEQA includes a list of categorical exemptions available to the City. If a project qualifies under one of these exemptions, the City may rely on it to exempt the project from CEQA requirements. Vice Mayor Rios asked whether the project would block Firestone, noting that it is a thoroughfare.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 15 of 26 3 PROPERTY USE ADMIN/PERMITS CONT’D Mr. Houston stated that the design was required due to a previously approved drive-through configuration, in which queuing exited onto Firestone; however, the current design shows the opposite condition. Mayor Barron questioned capacity for up to 10 vehicles in the drive- through. Mr. Houston responded in the affirmative. Mayor Barron expressed confidence in the site’s appeal to businesses and cited resident interest in new and unique options. RECESS The City Council recessed at 9:01 p.m., and reconvened at 9:14 p.m., with three (3) Members of Council. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS Pablo Sifuentes has been a volunteer coach for the JAA for multiple years. He is not here to speak about the 4-1 vote, although it’d be nice to allow the residents to vote. And the ironic thing about allowing residents to vote is that with the JAA Board, he hasn’t been given any answers to questions that he’s asked JAA President Cindy and Vice President Carlos or Field Coordinator Alma. He has multiple times asked the JAA who can nominate him, how many nominations does he needs, what he can run for, who can vote in the JAA elections, and where the results are for the last JAA election. Mr. Sifuentes finds Carlos, JAA Vice President silly trying him to instruct his travel ball parents to complain against Pilar Avalos for the 4-1 vote, but he reminded Carlos that these issues with the fields have been going on for years. He was informed by Carlos and James Markel from Parks & Rec that my best bet to get practice fields is to be associated with the JAA because JAA is offered fields first. But his JAA parents and him see that this is not true because when his practice lights were turned off last Tuesday, two weeks ago, there were two other programs actively training. He has spoken very highly of South Gate Park to his family and friends and has always recommended it. He knows all these petty issues will get resolved soon. James Markel called him a few days back to start off the conversation by asking him how he was and hearing his side of the story with the lights being turned off and all. He told James and James’ response was right off the bat, you’re a liar for saying that I allowed you to be on the field. Mr. Sifuentes doesn’t blame James for Carlos’ mistake with not putting in the request and wouldn’t be surprised if someone like Carlos,

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 16 of 26 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS CONT’D who usually has his power trip, says that he purposely didn’t put in the request for fields because if he wasn’t planning on putting the request Carlos should have notified him, which he didn’t. As a coach who enjoys practicing with the JAA kids, he was in constant communication with the parks staff. He was a little annoyed with the Vice Mayor for not knowing how many fields there are at South Gate Park. Mr. Sifuentes is going to have four games, two on Friday and two on Saturday with the South Gate JAA kids. Unfortunately, it’s not going to be at South Gate Park because he has always been told no. It’s not like the park has 10 fields and he is having games, a park that has one field they are hosting them. Amy Lou, Manager at Leland Weaver Library, stated that after over a year is happy to announce that they are finally reopening. They have an event on Friday, March 20th at 3 p.m. Henry Gonzalez stated having their first Rotary Youth Summit Festival. He recognized the city of South Gate and Mayor Barron for taking his Sunday afternoon. He also recognized Detective Lopez with the Police Explorers and would like to recognize the Police Explorers for their community service hours. Mr. Gonzalez read a certificate of appreciation for the inaugural Youth Summit Festival. He recognized Councilwoman Avalos and City Clerk Glaze as Rotarians. He is soliciting Vice Mayor Rios as a future Rotarian, and mentions Luis Torres who’s getting initiated tomorrow as a Rotarian. Alejandrina Mescua, owner of Taqueria Tepeque, expressed concern about a new law requiring a 7% increase in utility bills. She stated her opposition to the increase and requested the Council’s support for small businesses. She also thanked Councilwoman Avalos for her continued support of local small businesses. Ms. Mescua noted that many street vendors operate without permits and highlighted the recent law allowing the sale of food from private residences. Pichardo, of San Gabriel Avenue, referenced the June 2025 Council Meeting, during which he stated that Council Member Hurtado directed profanity toward Council Member Avalos. He noted that when he previously raised this concern, Council Member Hurtado denied using such language. Pichardo further stated that Council Member Hurtado’s repeated use of profanity during the most recent Council Meeting supports

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 17 of 26 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS CONT’D his original assertion and, in his view, reflects on the council member’s conduct. He also noted an inconsistency in the mayor’s remarks urging residents to reduce personal expenses, such as coffee or lunch, in order to pay the utility tax, while city warrants show approximately $600 spent on council meeting dinners over six meetings. He said that it is difficult to take personal budgeting guidance seriously when the council incurs such dining expenses for a limited number of meetings. He thanked Gabriel for clarifying the appropriate code regarding the utility trailer on his property. He looks forward to Gabriel’s follow-up email and is still awaiting a response from city manager. With that matter resolved, he wishes to address the allegation that he requested a favor or special treatment from Mayor Barron. He asks the council directly whether he has ever sought such treatment from any of them. Council Member Hurtado has already confirmed that he has not. If the remaining council members agree that he has never requested special treatment, it would be unreasonable to assume he would suddenly begin doing so with Mayor Barron. Therefore, he asks Mayor Barron to state clearly whether he ever requested a favor or special treatment. He awaits a response. Francisco Gallegos, Otis Street, expressed concern regarding the City’s delay in utilizing available federal funds for long-needed sidewalk repairs. He noted that he walks daily and regularly observes hazardous conditions throughout the City. Mr. Gallegos questioned why the City is now “scrambling” to use these funds and why earlier action was not taken to ensure they could be applied appropriately. His other issue is public safety on city streets. The city has a new chief of police but there are still not enough police officers. The city streets have become a “pick your parts” when people come at night and take whatever part they want from a vehicle. He and his wife are thinking about leaving South Gate. They don’t feel safe anymore. He brings up issues like illegal fireworks and asks why not make all fireworks illegal. Jimmy Ozaeta, a South Gate resident, expressed concern about the lack of decorum in the council chambers. He stated that the conduct displayed at the February 24 council meeting was troubling, noting that Council Member Davila publicly criticized Council Member Avalos, and Council Member Hurtado made remarks directed at Council Member Avalos’ sister as well as other residents. He also noted that Council Member Hurtado used profanity that was audible on the microphone, which he viewed as inappropriate and unacceptable in a public setting.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 18 of 26 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS CONT’D Mr. Ozaeta stated that residents who attend council meetings to participate in their local government should not be subjected to such behavior. He said that when elected officials respond to disagreement by targeting residents or their families, it reflects poorly on their leadership and creates an atmosphere of intimidation. He also addressed comments made by Mayor Barron questioning his credibility and residency. Mr. Ozaeta stated that all South Gate residents— whether born in the city, new to the community, or part of immigrant families—deserve respect and the opportunity to be heard without their identity or feedback being dismissed. He emphasized that South Gate’s diversity is a strength and should not be used against residents who engage civically. Mr. Ozaeta reminded the Council that they were elected by the community and are accountable to its members. He encouraged the Council to view public feedback as an opportunity to serve residents better, not as a threat. He stated that maintaining decency and decorum is essential to public service and that the council chambers must remain a safe space for open participation and accountability. He concluded by urging all Council Members to recommit to a higher standard of conduct toward both residents and one another, noting that the community is watching and deserves leadership rooted in dignity and respect. Victoria addressed her remarks to Councilwoman Avalos, noting that in recent meetings she has observed city staff working diligently to prepare budget presentations, only for their efforts to be disrupted. She stated that Councilwoman Avalos frequently asks questions during the meetings that place staff on the spot and questioned whether the Councilwoman reviews the agendas in advance. Victoria expressed concern that these actions give the impression that staff are being made to look unprepared. Robyn Logan, South Gate resident, is also asking for decorum with the commissioners that Council appoint. It seems that they come to each of these meetings and like the person who just spoke before her with nothing but complaints. There are no plans. They say we do this and we do that, but where are they? Where are the Tweedy Mile Board Members? Why is the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting on Thursday cancelled? She listened to the last meeting and heard a gentleman say, “People that walk at night and don’t wear the right colors. They’re all dark. You can’t see them.” She has also brought up comments at the last council meeting and is very disappointed at the mere fact that we are just complaining yet at the same time some of us actually do have real concerns and we’d like to see

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 19 of 26 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS CONT’D how we can get them implemented. She thinks we as citizens could put together an actual team of people, PSA, get it out there. But it doesn’t seem like that. The commissioners that come here would rather complain that they’d want to go ahead and get that budget passed with erroneous numbers. So, she applauds Council for actually passing that because it does mean that you guys want to move forward. Ms. Logan works in capital funds; she understands budget and understands what staff are trying to accomplish and three months will not work. Robyn Logan, a South Gate resident, expressed concern regarding the conduct of certain commissioners appointed by the Council. She noted that some commissioners attend meetings primarily to voice complaints rather than present constructive plans or updates. Ms. Logan questioned the absence of Tweedy Mile Board Members and asked why the upcoming Parks and Recreation Commission meeting on Thursday had been cancelled. She also referenced remarks made at a previous meeting that she found inappropriate and stated that this pattern of unproductive commentary is disappointing. While she recognizes that many residents have legitimate concerns and wish to work collaboratively toward solutions, she feels that this spirit of cooperation is not being reflected by all commissioners. Ms. Logan suggested that citizens could organize a team or public service initiative to help address issues more effectively. She further commented that some commissioners appear more focused on criticizing the budget process than contributing meaningfully. She commended the Council for approving the budget, stating that doing so demonstrates a commitment to moving forward. As someone who works with capital funds, Ms. Logan noted that she understands budgeting challenges and emphasized that a three-month timeframe is not feasible for achieving the goals staff are working toward. Lastly, she wants to speak on some of the stuff that’s been said throughout the last few months, about information on the UUT and how there’s misinformation. She would say there is lack of information. She has spoken to many residents, neighbors, business owners that have no idea this is coming down the pipeline. Staff should be providing information for everyone. She hopes there will be Spanish translators and literature in Spanish regarding the budget. Edgar Pelayo, of Madison Avenue, stated that there is a practical solution to the concern raised by the previous speaker. He noted that the city previously offered a call-in feature for meetings and emphasized that it should be reinstated. Although state law now requires it, he believes it

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 20 of 26 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS CONT’D should have been implemented voluntarily, as it would increase community participation and feedback. Mr. Pelayo also commented on the conduct at the last Council meeting, stating that it was disappointing and did not reflect the community’s values. He stressed the importance of maintaining mutual respect and avoiding personal attacks, and he encouraged the Council to uphold these standards moving forward. Lastly, he addressed recent discussions regarding the Utility Users Tax (UUT). He stated that the issue is not misinformation but rather a lack of accessible information. He reported that many residents, neighbors, and business owners are unaware of the matter. He urged staff to ensure information is broadly available and requested that Spanish translation services and Spanish-language materials be provided for budget discussions. EMAILS Selena Cepeda, a parent of four children involved with the South Gate Aqua Coalition swim team, expressed concern regarding the city’s budget deficit and encouraged the council to consider alternatives to reducing funding for the swim stadium. She noted that a six-month pool closure would significantly affect local youth swimmers by limiting practice opportunities, reducing their ability to qualify for competitive events, and increasing challenges for the swim club to maintain affordable membership for the community. Mario Dominguez requests that the City Council place an item on a future agenda to consider reinstalling call-in or Zoom access for council meetings. He also expresses concern regarding the recent discontinuation of Zoom participation. Claudia Rivera states that records show the city’s budget deficit was discussed in early 2020, during Councilwoman Avalo’s tenure as city auditor—a role responsible for monitoring and understanding the city’s financial condition. Rivera asserts this places heightened responsibility on Avalos for being aware of the issue. She further notes that public statements portrayed the deficit as unexpected, and that comments from certain commissioners contributed to a misleading narrative regarding the city’s financial situation and the ballot measure presented to voters. Nelson Hermosillo, of Dorothy Avenue, commented on the previous meeting’s budget discussion. He stated that while he does not necessarily agree or disagree with Councilwoman Avalos’ decision, he respects her authority to make it. He expressed concern over certain council members’ disrespectful remarks toward Councilwoman Avalos and found such

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 21 of 26 COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NON-AGENDA ITEMS CONT’D conduct unacceptable. He noted that he would have preferred those council members to be present and intends to repeat his comments at the next meeting. Mr. Hermosillo emphasized that the community has entrusted Councilwoman Avalos with making difficult decisions. He agreed with a previous speaker’s observation that she asks tough questions and recommended that such questions be provided to staff in advance to allow for thorough responses. Regarding council members who disagreed with or criticized Councilwoman Avalos’ vote, he stated that community opinions were mixed. However, he added that those who resort to name-calling or questioning her right to vote should reconsider their role on the council. He further noted that some of the same council members were present when past financial issues were created and are now avoiding responsibility. REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS Tina De La Rosa, Acting Director of Parks & Recreation, reported that last week’s dance recital had an excellent turnout and reminded the public to register for the upcoming Easter Fest and 5K run. Gabriel Perez, Director of Community Development, nothing to report. Luis Frausto, Director of Administrative Services, provided a brief follow-up to Council Member Avalos’ question regarding the figures presented. The department has reconciled the numbers in the table and will send a follow-up email for clarity. He noted that the confusion likely stems from the use of final budget figures instead of actual; both sets of numbers will be provided to ensure consistent information for all Council Members. He also reported that the utility payment portal has been restored, though intermittent outages continue. The department is coordinating with the City Manager’s Office to inform the public of these issues, and a contract to replace the portal is expected to be executed soon. Lastly, he addressed repeated public comments regarding a call-in feature for council meetings. The department is actively working with a consultant to identify and implement the necessary technology and hardware. One challenge is that a single staff member currently manages all City Clerk functions, including camera operations. The department is collaborating with the City Clerk to ensure her office has the equipment and workstation needed to support this additional feature. The city remains

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 22 of 26 REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS CONT’D committed to this effort, and Council should expect progress in the coming months. Jon Hamilton, Director of Human Resources, nothing to report. Manny Arana, Chief of Police, acknowledged ongoing staffing shortages within the department. Due to the city’s financial constraints and resulting budget reductions, he has begun scaling back street patrols and limiting overtime. Rob Houston, City Manager - nothing to report. Raúl F. Salinas, City Attorney - nothing to report. Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer - nothing to report. Yodit Glaze, City Clerk - nothing to report. Council Member Avalos addressed the Council and requested Spanish translation services to ensure accessibility for Spanish-speaking residents. She clarified that she has not taken any action to prevent the public’s ability to vote and stated that her prior position opposing a fiscal emergency declaration was based on concerns that the issue relates to expenditures exceeding revenues, as reflected in the City’s audit. She emphasized that policy disagreements should not be mischaracterized and that public service requires accepting community feedback and scrutiny. Council Member Avalos expressed concern that characterizing community comments or social media discussions as “attacks” may discourage public participation and distract from City business. She inquired of the City Attorney regarding potential liability related to statements made by commissioners, and the City Attorney responded that comments made within the course and scope of official duties during public meetings are generally protected forms of free speech. She also clarified her name as Maria del Pilar Avalos and addressed statements made regarding her identity. Council Member Avalos further raised concerns regarding youth program funding, in-kind City support, and the need for transparency in discussions involving potential service reductions, employee compensation adjustments, and early retirement plans. She noted that no formal Council action has been taken on such matters. She emphasized the importance of accountability, professionalism, and respectful conduct among public officials, and raised a question regarding employee treatment within the City Clerk’s Office. Lastly, she reported that she did not attend a

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 23 of 26 REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS CONT’D scheduled AB 1234-related event in Sacramento due to sufficient staffing but will attend a Vector Control meeting later in the week. Vice Mayor Rios thanked staff for their ongoing work and acknowledged the challenges and opportunities facing the City. He recognized senior center volunteers in attendance and expressed concern regarding recent issues at the senior center, including staffing changes, service disruptions, and the need for Spanish-speaking staff to effectively communicate with seniors. He noted concerns raised by seniors, including a petition, and emphasized the importance of addressing these matters promptly. Vice Mayor Rios also expressed concern regarding delays in restoring a public Wi-Fi hotspot, stating that the service should be operational in a timely manner to support community wellness. Additionally, he raised concerns about the condition of park restrooms, noting cleanliness issues and the need for improved maintenance, particularly given the high level of public use. He emphasized the importance of addressing these operational concerns to ensure quality services for the community. Mayor Barron discussed the Council’s agenda review process, noting that agenda materials are provided at the time they are released to the public. He explained that Council Members typically review materials over several days, submit questions to staff, and meet with the City Manager prior to the meeting to ensure they are fully informed. He emphasized that this process has been consistently followed and allows Council Members to have their questions addressed in advance. Mayor Barron highlighted the importance of submitting questions to staff in a timely manner, noting that last-minute inquiries may be more difficult to address prior to meetings. He encouraged Council Members to provide questions earlier in the process to allow staff sufficient time to prepare thorough responses and ensure efficient communication. Mayor Barron also spoke about his involvement in local youth programs, including his role as a volunteer and board member, and shared feedback he has received from parents regarding potential impacts to programming due to anticipated budget reductions. He noted that participation levels remain strong; however, uncertainty regarding future funding has created concerns about the continuation of certain programs. Additionally, Mayor Barron addressed concerns related to the proposed Utility Users Tax measure and public understanding of the issue. He stated that the inability to place the measure on a June ballot has led to questions from residents and emphasized the importance of clearly communicating the reasons for that outcome. He further noted that the City continues to face financial challenges, including expenditures growing at a higher rate

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 24 of 26 REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS CONT’D than revenues, and emphasized the importance of addressing these issues moving forward. Mayor Barron expressed concern regarding misinformation being shared within the community, including statements made to residents about the potential impacts of the Utility Users Tax. He emphasized that it is the responsibility of elected officials to correct inaccurate information and ensure that residents receive clear and factual communication. During the discussion, Mayor Barron responded to comments made regarding the impact of utility-related costs on residents and noted that broader economic factors should be considered when evaluating such claims. He concluded by emphasizing the importance of maintaining respectful dialogue among Council Members while ensuring that accurate information is communicated to the public. CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were approved by motion of Vice Mayor Rios and seconded by Mayor Barron. Items 4, 5, 6, and 7 were pulled for separate discussion. ROLL CALL: Council Member Avalos, yes; Vice Mayor Rios, yes; Mayor Barron, yes; Council Member Hurtado, absent; Council Member Davila, absent. 4 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT & SELECTION The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-10-CC entitled Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate, California, to approve the reclassification of the full-time Executive Assistant position in the Public Works Department to a full-time Public Works Special Projects Coordinator position during Consent Calendar. 5 PARKS The City Council approved items A & B during Consent Calendar: a. Change order in the amount of $35,542.00 to increase the overall original purchase order issued to Fast Deer Charter Inc., to the amount of $84,542 (P.O. No. 0009488) to provide transportation for Parks and Recreation trips for the remainder of the current fiscal year 2025/26; and b. Authorized the Interim Director of Parks and Recreation to execute any additional documents needed.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 Page 25 of 26 6 FINANCIAL MGMT The City Council approved items A & B during Consent Calendar: a. Professional Services Agreement (Contract No. 2026-16-CC) with Meeder Public Funds, Inc. for discretionary investment management services for an initial term of three (3) years, with up to two (2) one- year renewal options at the City's sole discretion, for a total term not to exceed five (5) years; and b. Authorized the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form approved as to form by the City Attorney. 7 PUBLIC WORKS/ ENGINEERING ADMIN The City Council approved items A, B, & C during Consent Calendar: a. Authorized the purchase of six (6) 2026 Chevrolet Silverado electric trucks, or a comparable electric truck if unavailable, from National Auto Fleet Group through the Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Program, to replace Public Works Department’s trucks, in an amount not to exceed $379,356 ($63,226 per truck); b. Approved the purchase of two (2) detective vehicles for the Police Department in a total amount not to exceed $98,000; and c. Authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the purchases in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 8 EMERGENCY/DISASTER PLANNING/PROGRAMS The City Council considered approving the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) (Contract No. 2026-17-CC) between the Gateway Cities Council of Governments and the City of South Gate for technical services under the Strategic Growth Council Regional Climate Collaborative Program during Consent Calendar. 9 FINANCIAL AUDITS The City Council received and filed the City of South Gate’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025, during Consent Calendar.

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 10, 2026 10 WARRANTS The City Council approved the Warrant Register for March 10, 2026, by motion of Mayor Barron and seconded by Council Member Avalos. Total ofChecks: $ 4,378,794.41 Less:Voids $ (7,811.89) Less:EmployeePayrollDeductions $ (411,575.27) GrandTotal: $3,959,407.25 Cancellations: 113470, 113454, 113200, and 113074 ROLL CALL: Council MemberAvalos, yes; Vice Mayor Rios, yes; Mayor Barron, yes; Council Member Hurtado, absent; Council Member Davila, absent. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Barron adjourned the meeting at 11 :14 p.m. and seconded by Vice Mayor Rios. PASSED and APPROVED on this 28'h day of April 2026. ATTEST: Yodit aze, City Clerk Page 26 of 26

Agenda

SOUTH GATE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

Tuesday, March 10, 2026 at 6:30 p.m.

SOUTH GATE COUNCIL CHAMBERS

8650 CALIFORNIA AVE

SOUTH GATE, CA 90280

VIEW MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT: HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/@SOUTHGATECA90280

City Officials

MAYOR, Joshua Barron

CITY CLERK, Yodit Glaze

VICE MAYOR, Al Rios

CITY TREASURER, Jose De La Paz

COUNCIL MEMBER, Maria del Pilar Avalos

CITY MANAGER, Rob Houston

COUNCIL MEMBER, Maria Davila

CITY ATTORNEY, Ra ú l F. Salinas

COUNCIL MEMBER, Gil Hurtado

If you would like to participate in this meeting, you can participate via the following options:

1. VIEW THE MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT: South Gate, CA - YouTube

Please allow up to 24 hours after the meeting for the archive to be available.

2. PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING by emailing the City Clerk at:

yglaze@sogate.org no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please write "Public Comment" in the subject line.

3. ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON

*The disruption in service of any alternative method does not prelude the City Council or other legislative

body from taking further action and moving forward on the agenda.

Meeting Schedule

The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session business will usually commence at 5:30 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 6:30 p.m.

Brown Act

Agendas are drafted to accurately state what the legislative body is being asked to consider. The legislative body can take action on "all items" listed on the agenda and be in compliance with the open meeting laws. Under the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The governing body may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting.

City's Vision Statement

We envision a thriving, safe and inclusive community where everyone has the opportunity to access exceptional services, education and support to be resilient and live full, vibrant lives.

Public Communications

Public Comments on agenda items are limited to three (3) minutes. All comments are to be addressed directly to the Agency Members not to the members of the public.

Emails for public comment received prior to 4:00 pm on the day of the Council Meeting will be summarized by the City Clerk, not read in its entirety. A copy of the email will be provided to the City Council and will also be available at the City Clerk's Office for public review. A copy of each email will be recorded for public record and noted on the official minutes of tonight's meeting.

Call to Order/Roll Call With Invocation & Pledge

CALL TO ORDER: Joshua Barron, Mayor

INVOCATION: Tina De La Rosa, Acting Director of Parks & Recreation

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

ROLL CALL: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk

SOUTH GATE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, March 10, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. SOUTH GATE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 8650 CALIFORNIA AVE SOUTH GATE, CA 90280 VIEW MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT: HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/@SOUTHGATECA90280 City Officials MAYOR, Joshua Barron CITY CLERK, Yodit Glaze VICE MAYOR, Al Rios CITY TREASURER, Jose De La Paz COUNCIL MEMBER, Maria del Pilar Avalos CITY MANAGER, Rob Houston COUNCIL MEMBER, Maria Davila CITY ATTORNEY, Raúl F. Salinas COUNCIL MEMBER, Gil Hurtado If you would like to participate in this meeting, you can participate via the following options: 1. VIEW THE MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT: South Gate, CA - YouTube Please allow up to 24 hours after the meeting for the archive to be available. 2. PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING by emailing the City Clerk at: yglaze@sogate.org no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please write "Public Comment" in the subject line. 3. ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON *The disruption in service of any alternative method does not prelude the City Council or other legislative body from taking further action and moving forward on the agenda. Meeting Schedule The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, 1

closed session business will usually commence at 5:30 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 6:30 p.m. Brown Act Agendas are drafted to accurately state what the legislative body is being asked to consider. The legislative body can take action on "all items" listed on the agenda and be in compliance with the open meeting laws. Under the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The governing body may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting. City's Vision Statement We envision a thriving, safe and inclusive community where everyone has the opportunity to access exceptional services, education and support to be resilient and live full, vibrant lives. Public Communications Public Comments on agenda items are limited to three (3) minutes. All comments are to be addressed directly to the Agency Members not to the members of the public. Emails for public comment received prior to 4:00 pm on the day of the Council Meeting will be summarized by the City Clerk, not read in its entirety. A copy of the email will be provided to the City Council and will also be available at the City Clerk's Office for public review. A copy of each email will be recorded for public record and noted on the official minutes of tonight's meeting. Call to Order/Roll Call With Invocation & Pledge CALL TO ORDER: Joshua Barron, Mayor INVOCATION: Tina De La Rosa, Acting Director of Parks & Recreation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk ROLL CALL: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk Presentation 1. Mid-Year Budget Report and Adjustments for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The City Council will consider: (AS) a. Receive the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Report and Adjustments; b. Approve of Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Adjustments; and c. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate Approving Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Amendments and Adjustments. Documents: Item 1 Report 03102026.pdf 2

Public Hearings 2. Continued-Substantial Amendments to FY 2023-2024, 2024-2025 & 2025-2026 Annual Action Plans Following the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council will consider: (CD) a. Adopting a Resolution approving Substantial Amendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan; Substantial Amendment No. 2 to the Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 Annual Action Plan; and Substantial Amendment No. 1 to Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan Reprogramming Community Development Block Grant (CDBG); b. Authorize the City Manager or the Community Development Director to initiate appropriate action necessary to implement projects and programs as noted in the FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan. c. Reallocate $749,254 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and $340,000 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds from current activity allocations to the proposed budget amendments within each respective fund. Documents: Item 2 Report 03102026.pdf 3. Continued-General Plan Amendment No. 25-01, Zone Change No. 25-01, 8915 Vossler Avenue Following the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council will consider: (CD) a. A finding that in accordance with CEQA, this project qualifies for a categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (Class 3), “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures,” and is thereby exempt from CEQA in that the subject property will continue to be used as a parking lot for a new drive-through restaurant. b. Adopting Resolution No. 2026-__, included as Attachment 1, approving GPA No. 25-01 for a property at 8915 Vossler Avenue. c. Adopting Ordinance No. 2026-__, included as Attachment 2, approving ZC No. 25-01 for a property at 8915 Vossler Avenue. Documents: Item 3 Report 03102026.pdf Comments From The Audience - Non-Agenda Items During this time, members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items not 3

listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council and not on this agenda. Comments from the audience will be limited to three (3) minutes per speaker; unless authorized by the Mayor, the time limit may not be extended by utilizing another member's time. There will be no debate or action on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. The collective initial period of time for comments from the audience shall be limited to 45 minutes. Any speaker that did not get a chance to speak during this segment due to the 45-minute limitations will be able to speak at the end of the meeting prior to adjournment. Note: The City Council desires to provide all members of the public with the opportunity to address the Council. Nevertheless, obscene language, comments intended to disrupt/interfere, other actions which disrupt the progress of the meeting or slanderous comments will not be tolerated and may result in ejection and/or may constitute a violation of South Gate Municipal Code Section1.04.110. Reports And Comments From City Officials During this time, members of the City Council will report on matters pertaining to their service on various intergovernmental boards and commissions as a representative of the City pursuant to Assembly Bill 1234. City Council Members will also have an opportunity to comment on matters not on the agenda. Consent Calendar Items Agenda Items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are Consent Calendar Items. All items including Ordinances, Resolutions and Contracts, may be approved by adoption of the Consent Calendar, individually and collectively by one (1) motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action. Members of the public are permitted to speak on any item listed but their time period is limited to three (3) minutes in total. Any motion to introduce or adopt an Ordinance on the Consent Calendar shall be: (1) a motion to waive the reading of the Ordinance and introduce the Ordinance or (2) a motion to waive the reading of the Ordinance and adopt the Ordinance, as appropriate. 4. Approve a Resolution to Reclassify the Full-Time Executive Assistant Position in the Public Works Department to a Full-Time Public Works Special Projects Coordinator Position The City Council will consider: (HR) a. Adopting a Resolution to approve the reclassification of the full-time Executive Assistant position in the Public Works Department to a full-time Public Works Special Projects Coordinator position. Documents: Item 4 Report 03102026.pdf 4

5. Approve Contract Change Order No. 001 to Original Purchase Order No. 0009488 with Fast Deer Bus Charter, Inc. The City Council will consider: (PARKS) a. Approving a change order in the amount of $35,542.00 to increase the overall original purchase order issued to Fast Deer Charter Inc., to the amount of $84,542 (P.O. No. 0009488) to provide transportation for Parks and Recreation trips for the remainder of the current fiscal year 2025/26; and b. Authorizing the Interim Director of Parks and Recreation to execute any additional documents needed. Documents: Item 5 Report 03102026.pdf 6. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Meeder Public Funds, Inc. for Discretionary Investment Management Services The City Council will consider: (AS) a. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Meeder Public Funds, Inc. for discretionary investment management services for an initial term of three (3) years, with up to two (2) one-year renewal options at the City's sole discretion, for a total term not to exceed five (5) years; and b. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form approved as to form by the City Attorney. Documents: Item 6 Report 03102026.pdf 7. Approve Purchase of City Fleet Vehicles – Six (6) Electric Chevrolet Silverado Trucks (Public Works) and Two (2) Police Detective Vehicles (Police Department) The City Council will consider: (PW) a. Authorizing the purchase of six (6) 2026 Chevrolet Silverado electric trucks, or a comparable electric truck if unavailable, from National Auto Fleet Group through the Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Program, to replace Public Works Department’s trucks, in an amount not to exceed $379,356 ($63,226 per truck); and b. Approving the purchase of two (2) detective vehicles for the Police Department in a total amount not to exceed $98,000; c. Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the purchases in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 5

Documents: Item 7 Report 03102026.pdf 8. Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Gateway Cities Council of Governments and the City of South Gate for Technical Assistance under the Strategic Growth Council Regional Climate Collaboratives Program The City Council will consider: (CD) a. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the Gateway Cities Council of Governments and the City of South Gate for technical services under the Strategic Growth Council Regional Climate Collaborative Program. Documents: Item 8 Report 03102026.pdf 9. Receive & File the 2024-25 Annual ACFR Financial Report The City Council will consider: (AS) a. Receiving and filing the City of South Gate’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025. Documents: Item 9 Report 03102026.pdf Reports, Recommendations And Requests 10. Warrant Register for March 10, 2026 The City Council will consider: (ADMIN SVCS) a. Approving the Warrant Register for March 10, 2026. Total of Checks: $4,378,794.41 Less: Voids $(7,811.89) Less: Employee Payroll Deductions $(411,575.27) Grand Total: $3,959,407.25 Cancellations: 113470, 113454, 113200, and 113074 Documents: Item 10 Report 03102026.pdf Adjournment 6

I, Yodit Glaze, City Clerk, certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Meeting Agenda was posted on March 5, 2026, at 6:35 p.m., as required by law. Yodit Glaze City Clerk GENERAL NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The City Council adopted new rules relating to the conduct of the public meetings, proceedings, and business in the City of South Gate on July 12, 2022, (Resolution 2022-38-CC) and go into effect on August 1, 2022. Resolution #2022-38-CC is available at the City Clerk’s Office. MEETING SCHEDULE Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session meetings will commence at 5:30 p.m. unless posted otherwise on its agenda. The regular City Council meetings will commence at 6:30 p.m. Agendas are available at the following locations: City Clerk Office, Public Notice Boards at City Hall, and on the City’s web page at https://www.cityofsouthgate.org The Public can sign up to receive automatic notices of postings of agendas for the City Council or any other Commission or Board of the City of South Gate. Visit the City webpage and click on the Agenda & Minutes icon. That will take you the page where an individual can enter their email in the “Email Updates” box to register. PUBLIC COMMENT/PARTICIPATION Any person may request to address a legislative body during a public meeting. The Presiding Officer will call upon those present in the Council Chambers. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes on any item listed on the agenda, including public hearings. Under Comments from the Audience portion, speakers are also limited to a single three (3) minutes time limit. Comments from the Audience is initially limited to 45 minutes at each meeting. Any speaker still wishing to speak, that did not speak, will have an addition Comments from the Audience opportunity after the last business item is finished. The Presiding Officer may extend the time limit as long as there is no objection from the City Council as a body. To ensure that the public is able to participate, the City provides the opportunity to submit their comments in person, email, mail. Methods of participation may be subject to change during other such times when a State of Emergency, Health Order or State Executive Order limits in-person participation. CURFEW In absence of a motion duly adopted by majority vote of the City Council, the Presiding Officer may adjourn the City Council meetings at 10:30 p.m. The Presiding Officer may ask the City Council if any agenda items listed should be continued or dealt with during the meeting. For those items to be continued, the City Council can direct the item be placed on the next City Council agenda or the current meeting may be adjourned to a time certain at which time the meeting shall be reconvened as an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and action upon the published agenda continued. STAFF REPORTS 7

As a general rule, staff reports. or other written documentation are prepared/organized with respect to each item of business listed on the agenda. Meeting agendas and staff reports are available at least 72- hours prior to the scheduled regular City Council meeting and a minimum of 24-hours prior to a Special City Council meeting. There are times when the City Council receives written material. revised material after the posting of agendas, these materials are become a public record and will be available for public view within 72-hours after the meeting in which they were received. Those materials and any other public document can be inspected in the City Clerk's Office located at 8650 California Avenue, South Gate. SERVICES TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO PUBLIC MEETINGS In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the City Council Meetings, please contact the Office of the City Clerk. Notification 48 hours prior to the City Council Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility. For further information, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 563-9510 or via email at yglaze@sogate.org. 8

ao-""'h'"':."l'il'a('("'f:"("l-i Item No. 1 MAR'- 5 7026 FJLED Ciffl of South Gate l:lq,, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BULL For the Regular Meeting of: March 10, 2026 Originating Department: Administrative Services LuisFrausto Ro b Houston SUBJECT: MID-YEAR BUDGET REPORT AND ADJUSTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: a. Receive the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Report and Adjustments; b. Approve of Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Adjustments; and c. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of South Gate Approving Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Amendments and Adjustments. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report updates the Mayor, City Council, and comrniu'iity on the City's financial performance for the first half of Fiscal Year 2025-26 (July through December 2025), presents recommended mid-year budget adjustments, and provides context for the FY 2026-27 budget development process. The City closed FY 2024-25 with an unassigned General Fund balance of $9.4 million. That reserve is projected to be nearly fully consumed by the end of the current fiscal year, leaving an estimated balance of approximately $1.O million. This drawdown reflects a structural imbalance between ongoing revenues ($71.9 million projected) and ongoing expenditures ($82.5 million projected), resulting in an operational deficit of approximately $10.6 million. Cost pressures largely outside the City's control are the primary driver. Since FY 2019-20, pension obligations, employee health insurance, liability and workers' compensation insurance, and street lighting and landscaping costs have increased by a combined $10.7 million annually - an amount that exceeds the entire structural deficit. At the same time, revenues have underperformed, particularly sales tax, which has contracted approximately l 1.9% over the past thirteen quarters due in part to the permanent closure of a major auto dealership. Federal ARPA fiinding that previously helped bridge this gap has been fully expended. Through December 2025, the City collected $18.2 million in General Fund revenues (24.6% of budget) and spent $33.0 million (40.8% of budget), consistent with historical mid-year patterns. No new General Fund appropriations are requested. Proposed adjustments are limited to non- General Fund accounts, grant-funded programs, and reallocation of existing authority. I 9

With reserves being used to balance the budget, the FY 2026-27 budget will require meaningfiil decisions about service levels and expenditures. All departments have received instructions to identify reductions, and a comprehensive plan will be presented to the City Council during the upcoming budget process. Staff requests that the City Council receive and approve this Mid-Year Budget Report and adopt the associated resolution approving mid-year budget amendments. The complete report follows. BACKGROUND On July 22, 2025, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 0perating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets. The FY 2025-26 Budget serves as the City's financial operating plan, establishing organizational goals, budget priorities, and service levels for the fiscal year, and identifying the resources necessary to deliver those services. The adopted budget is based on a series of revenue and expenditure assumptions. As the year progresses, changes in economic conditions, grant awards, and operating needs necessitate periodic adjustments to appropriation. In many cases, these adjustments allow departments to spend newly awarded grant funds for which no appropriation currently exists, or to align multi- year grants and capital projects with final award amounts. In other cases, adjustments are required to reflect contractual obligations or operational changes that were not 'fully known at the time of budget adoption. The FY 2025-26 Mid-Year Financial Review reports on the City's fiscal performance for the period of July through December 2025. The report primarily focuses on the General Fund, which supports core municipal services, including law enforcement, public works, and parks and recreation. The City currently faces a structural budget deficit in which ongoing operating expenditures exceed ongoing revenues. Prior fiscal year budgets-maintained service levels by using one-time resources, including federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding, interfund transfers, and planned use of fiind balance. Those temporary resources are now largely exhausted and are no longer available to support ongoing operations. As a result, future budgets must increasingly rely on aligning recurring revenues with recurring expenditures. In the absence of new recurring revenue sources, the City will need to implement expenditure reductions to bring the General Fund into structural balance. ANALYSIS: FY 2024-25 Year End At the end of each fiscal year, the Administrative Services Department begins its process of closing out the year. This process includes reconciling the budget and ensuring all capital improvement project carryovers are processed and reflected in the new fiscal year. In addition, to avoid potential budget inflation, at the end of each fiscal year, all purchase orders and encumbrances are closed out, except for multi-year capital projects. 2 10

Once the City's budget is adopted and committed in Eden, the City's financial system, the new fiscal year is open for activity. City departments can review financial activity in the general ledger, initiate purchase orders, and track revenues and expenditures FY 2024-25 General Fund Year-End Performance The FY 2024-25 General Fund Budget included expenditures of $74.1 million, offset by $69.1 million in projected revenues. Based on the audited figures for FY 2024-25, the City ended the year with $70.9 million in expenditures, offset by $68.9 million in revenue and the use of $1,631,882 in net transfers from Reserves. The FY 2024-25 Ending Unassigned Fund Balance is $9.4 million. In the table below, revenue and expenditure figures include transfers in/out. .'y 1, e9 ; ,t_; [ ; ; f I @ ! a I T t IJr li -; e '- J s I l' I I I i e i I, *giiiigi i ! t s sat ' 1@ lai I I t fi1,1, I ! kIII J P * bi '111115 ;:Y2U:5FinaL FY2025Year-End Beginning Unassigned Fund Balance $ 9,728,019 $ 9,728,019 Revenues 69,135,198 68,963,426 Expenditures 74,135,280 70910639 OperatingSurplus(Deficit) (5,000,082) (1,947,213) TransferfromReserve 3,177,000 1,631,882 Ending Unassigned Fund Balance $ 7,904,937 $ 9,412,688 FY 2025-26 Changes from Adopted Budget to Mid-Year Budget When the FY 2025-26 budget was presented to City Council for consideration in July 2025, economists were discussing concerns about inflation, a 3.2% CPI increase, and Federal Reserve interest rate adjustments aimed at curbing it. The City of South Gate anticipated a moderate increase in property tax, offset by a reduction in sales tax. As the fiscal year has progressed, revenues have underperformed adopted budget projections in several key categories, most notably Sales Tax, reflecting both regional economic softness and the permanent loss of a major point-of- sale business. These developments reinforce the importance of continued monitoring of monthly receipts and disciplined expenditure management through the close of the fiscal year. * General Sales Tax and Measure P General Purpose 1% Local Sales Tax are performing lower than anticipated. * The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 created the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF). The City received $34,556,473 in SLFRF Funds which have been programmed in annual city budgets beginning in FY 2021-22. The FY 2025-26 budget included significant impacts due to anticipated rising costs in insurance premiums, annual increases to the City's Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) pension payments, the need to invest in aging capital infrastructure, and support of the Street Lighting and Landscaping Fiu'id. The proposed mid-year review and adjustments include as-needed pool repairs at swim stadium and fireworks show in July 2026 marking the 250'h birthday of the United States. Several revenue categories are projected to increase modestly, including Fines and Forfeitures, 3 11

Use of Money and Property, and Other Revenues, for a combined increase of $867,265. These small increases are offset by significant reductions in Sales Tax, Franchise Tax, Licenses and Pernnits, Intergovernmental and Fees and Charges. General Fund revenues are projected to decrease from $73,882,110 in the adopted budget to $71,858,928 after mid-year adjustments, a net reduction of $2,023,182 primarily driven by lower-than-anticipated sales tax collections. Expenditures are adjusted from $80,883,165 to $82,481,788 for a net change of