PZ-May-11-2026

Planning & Zoning Agenda May 11th, 2026 Regular Meeting 6:00 P.M.

CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, May 11 th, 2026 City Meeting Room – 74 6 th Street Agenda Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM 1. Approval of April 13 th, 2026 regular meeting minutes. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) @ 112 7 th Street. Block 60 Lot 3. Owner: Josh Porter; Contractor: NRG Industries. 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Residential Construction. (R-2) @ 18 Adams Street. Neels Addition Block 5 East 24’ Lot 3 and Lot 4. Owner: Leslie Rindler; Contractor: Galloway Construction. 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Accessory Structure. (R-1) @ 196 7 th Street. Block 170 Lot 4. Owners: Bill and Sherryl Eckles; Contractor: Bestway Portable Buildings. 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for Fence. (R-2) @ 170 20 th Avenue. Block 246 Lots 1-3. Owner: Brooke Evans; Contractor: Mr. Fence of Florida. 6. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure & Fence. (R-2) @ 197 14 th Street. Block 140 Lots 6-7. Owners: Michael and Constance Sams; Contractor: GeoFlora Group LLC. 7. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness. (R-1) @ 67 Avenue C. Block 15 Lots 1-2. Owner: Randy Fike; Contractor: GeoFlora Group LLC.

Other/New Business: Outstanding/Unresolved Issues: Motion to adjourn the meeting.

April 13th Meeting Minutes

CITY OF APALACHICOLA PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING Monday, April 13th, 2026 City Meeting Room – 74 6th Street Agenda Attendance: Joe Taylor, Jim Bachrach, Greg Golgowski, Lee McLemore, Bobby Miller, Ashley Leonard. Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM 1. Approval of March 9th, 2026 regular meeting minutes. a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Greg Golgowski – All in favor, motion carried. 2. Review, Discussion and Decision for Accessory Structure. (R-2) @ 170 19th Avenue. Block 247 Lots 1-13 and Lots 29-30. Owner: Edward Pearsall; Contractor: Self. a. Edward Pearsall, Owner – Present. No comment or questions from the Board. b. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Greg Golgowski – all in favor, motion carried. 3. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) @ 126 Avenue D. Block 43 Lots 4-5. Owner: Conrad Walser; Contractor: Self. a. Conrad Walser and Kathryn Chesser, Owners – Present. Confirmed that the height of the fence would not exceed 6’. As indicated on the survey, the fence will only run through the rear yard. b. Motion to approve by Bobby Miller; 2nd by Lee McLemore – all in favor, motion carried. 4. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) @ 140 Avenue D. Block 48 NW 15’ Lot 14 and Lot 15. Owner: John Cooke; Contractor: Self.

a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller – all in favor, motion carried. 5. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) @ 179 Avenue F. Block 93 Lots 1-2. Owner: Marjorie Howard; Contractor: Curtis Allen. a. Joseph Howard, Owner’s Son – Present. Confirmed to the Board that a new contractor will be hired to resolve all existing issues with the current fence. The Owners are willing to comply with all of the City’s requirements and want everything to be done correctly. b. Motion to approve on the conditions that: (1) the fence in the front yard shall not exceed 4’ in height; (2) the finished face of the fence shall face the street; (3) the chain link fence shall not be visible from the street; and (4) the fence shall be located entirely on the lot of the owner by Lee McLemore; 2nd by Bobby Miller – all in favor, motion carried. 6. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & New Residential Construction. (C-2) @ 190 7th Street. Block 170 Lot 3. Owners: Robert and Joyce Hall; Contractor: Hall Contracting and Construction Inc. a. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Lee McLemore – all in favor, motion carried. 7. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Residential Construction (Renewal). (R-2) @ 197 22nd Avenue. Block 263 Lots 16-19. Owners: Ron and Regina Ramfjord; Contractor: Tyler Poloronis. a. Ron and Regina Ramfjord, Owners – Present. Confirmed to the Board that there are no major changes proposed to the site plan. Any changes would be to the interior of the house only. Also confirmed that the front porch will be screened. b. Motion to approve by Bobby Miller; 2nd by Jim Bachrach - all in favor, motion carried. 8. Review, Discussion and Decision for New Residential Construction. (R-2) @ 126 18th Avenue. Block 251. Owners: Robert and Andrea Brown; Contractor: Bryce Ward.

a. Bryce Ward – Contractor. Present. Bobby Miller asked for clarification about the location of the property and Contractor provided more detailed information. b. Greg Golgowski commented that the attached garage sticks out past the front façade of the building. Contractor confirmed that it did. c. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller – all in favor, motion carried. 9. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence. (R-1) @ 112 7th Street. Block 60 Lot 3. Owner: Josh Porter; Contractor: NRG Industries. a. Dennis Winterringer, Attendee – Presented the following concerns to the Board. There is no approved stormwater management plan. The Owners placed fill on this property without a sealed grading plain or floodplain management permit. The placement of the fill will cause drainage issues because one side of the lot is higher than the other. A drainage ditch may be necessary where the fence is proposed. The Board should not approve this application and should wait for the decision of the Floodplain Administrator. b. Bobby Miller stated that there is no alley on this block, instead there is a drainage ditch. c. Joe Taylor and Jim Bacrach confirmed that the application on the agenda is for the fence, and that the fence meets all the requirements of the Land Development Code. i. Attorney confirmed that the Owners would proceed with construction of the fence at risk, if it turns out drainage or anything else is necessary on the recommendation of the Floodplain Administrator. d. Ashley Leonard asked if the approval could be conditioned on compliance with the Land Development Code. Attorney stated that if there is an issue with compliance, it becomes a Code Enforcement problem. No development would be allowed if out of compliance. Additionally, it is not

necessary to condition approval on compliance with the Code because compliance with the Code is already required. Further, the Attorney stated there is a difference between stormwater standards for residential and nonresidential developments; if the review of the stormwater management plan is more technical in nature than the Board may defer to Staff review and recommendation. i. Bobby Miller stated that the Board is not in the business of stormwater engineering. e. Greg Golgowski stated that if the current request is approved but the stormwater management plan / floodplain management permit requires alterations to the site plan, the applicant must come back before the Board. f. Jim Bachrach questioned on what basis the fence could be denied, as it is unrelated to the stormwater management plan. g. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller. Following discussion, motion amended to read as follows: i. Motion to table this item until the next meeting the Owners or Contractor can attend by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller – all in favor, motion carried. 10. Review, Discussion and Decision for Certificate of Appropriateness, New Residential Construction, Accessory Structure & Fence. (R-1) 104 9th Street. Block 70 Lot 1. Owners: Stephen and Betty Bailey; Contractor: Construct Group SE Inc. a. City Planner summarized changes made to the application following the February meeting. b. Stephen and Betty Bailey, Owners – Present. Confirmed that the sabal palm is on their property and that they intend to retain it where it is. Confirmed that the intent with the fill is to level the property. Clarified that the Army Corps permit took a long time to obtain because the property had to be inspected for historical and archaeological resources. None were found.

c. Glen Coxwell, Contractor – Present. Stated that the purpose of the 3’ brick wall is to help mitigate stormwater issues; directional weep holes could be added to the wall to further help with drainage. Additionally, he reaffirmed that all City requirements would be met in addition to those outlined in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit. d. Ashley Leonard expressed concern about the requirements of the FDEP and the impact of the brick wall on undisturbed wetlands. City Attorney clarified that the City does not regulate wetlands; if the Owners are found to violate their permit with FDEP, there would be consequences from FDEP. e. Tom Brocato – Attendee. Stated that this area has experienced flooding problems for the past 50 years. Further stated that even though vacant properties in this area can hold water, it isn’t enough to mitigate flooding problems. f. Caroline Widen – Attendee. Explained how the drainage changed after the lot next to hers was cleared for development. As a result, the water backs up into the lot and doesn’t drain the way it did before it was cleared. Her concern is that the brick wall will prevent the water from draining and hold it in the lot. g. Matt Tucker – Attendee. Stated that allowing fill on this lot will increase the flood risk for the surrounding lots and potentially increase insurance rates accordingly. There are no brick fences or walls in this neighborhood. Additionally, though reduced from the previous meeting the height of the building is still too large compared to the surrounding area. h. Dennis Winterringer – Attendee. Presented the following concerns to Board. There are no brick walls in the City, so this proposal would look out of place. Bobby Miller clarified there is a brick wall by the Chapman house. The elevations don’t show an enclosure around the bottom of the building; open foundations may be allowed but the Board should require an enclosure. The stormwater management plan is inadequate and the floodplain management permit has not been obtained. The sabal palm

should be relocated out of the path of the brick wall. The concrete apron around the driveway should be removed, as it will result in extra runoff. Permeable pavers or brick would be more suitable. i. The Contractor stated that there are houses in the Historic District with brick pilings; brick could be added to the pilings here if required. He also confirmed (1) that weep holes could be built into the brick wall to facilitate the movement of water and drainage of that water and (2) that the brick wall will sit on a concrete footer installed below grade. The brick will not sit on the ground. i. Motion to approve by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller – Lee McLemore opposed, motion carried 5-1. Other/New Business: N/A Outstanding/Unresolved Issues: N/A Motion to adjourn the meeting by Jim Bachrach; 2nd by Bobby Miller. All in favor - meeting adjourned at 7:35 PM.

Certificate of Appropriateness & Fence 112 7th Street

Official Use Only Date Received: _ City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Meeting Date: Fees Due: Application for Development/Site Plan Approval Date Fees Paid: OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner- a s h P a t e r Contractor Name NPE Industries Address 9 4 3 N a n t i c o k e C i r State License # 1332374 City License #_ N A City - Tallahasseestate PL zip 32303 aecoydevdopment11k@gmail.com Phone 850.508.4776 850.508. 4776Phone PROJECT TYPE New Construction A d d i t i o n Alteration/Renovation R e l o c a t i o n D e m o l i t i o n F e n c e Accessory Structure Certificate of Appropriateness O t h e r P R O P E R T Y I N F O R M A T I O N Street Address (911 Address): 1/2 Dr Frederid S. Hurphnies St. City & State: ApalachicolaParcel ID #: p a s t i c 8 3 3 0 - 0 0 6 0 - 0 0 2 0 Zip: 32320 Block: 6 0 Zoning District: [Historic District [ ]Non-Historic District FEMA Flood Zone: A E Lot: 3 Certificate of Appropriateness Required? Y / N Setback Requirements of Property: Front: Rear: _ Side: Corner Lot? Y /N Street Sides: Lot Coverage: STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: OFFICIAL USE ONLY This development request has been approved for a Certificate of Appropriateness (if applicable), zoning, land use, and development review by the City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a building permit is authorized to be issued City Statt D a t e A p p r o v e d NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. Applicant Initial

Describe the proposed project and materials. Describe the proposed project in terms of size, affected architectural elements, materials, and relationship to the existing structure(s). n e w f e n c e o n n e w c o n s t u c t i o n l o t s e e r e d l i n e s o n s i t e p l a n , n o t h i n g f o r w a r d - M e n o n s e . P R O J E C T S C O P E M A N U F A C T U R E R P R O D U C T D E S C R I P T I O N F L P R O D U C T A P P R O V A L # Siding M A Doors W i n d o w s Roofing T r i m F o u n d a t i o n NA N/t NA NIA NA S h u t t e r s P o r c h / D e c k Fencing Driveways/Sidewalks O t h e r Yella Wood wood - Pressure trated N A N A NOTE: Please have a site plan prepared to turn in with your application. At minimum, the site plan needs to contain: a North arrow, surrounding streets, lot lines, lot dimensions, setbacks, current structure dimensions, proposed structure dimensions, fence locations, fence heights, and the location. size and species of protected trees (refer to tree permit for a list of protected trees). Applications requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness will also need to submit renderings/elevations of any proposed structures and note the materials proposed. More information may be requested by City Staff.

C E R T I F I C A T I O N By signing below, I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge at the time of application. I acknowledge that I understand and have complied with all of the submittal requirements and procedures and have read and understand the following: 1. I/We hereby attest to the fact that the above supplied property addresses), parcel numbers), and legal description(s) is(are) the true and proper identification of the area of this petition. 2. I/We authorize staff from the City of Apalachicola to enter onto the property in question during regular business hours in order to take photos which will be placed in the permanent file. 3. I/We understand that the COA review time period will not commence until the application is deemed complete by staff and may take up to 10 business days to process. I further understand that an incomplete application submittal may cause my application to be deferred to the next posted deadline date. 4. I/We understand that, for Board review cases, an agenda and staff report (if applicable) will be available on the City's website approximately one week before the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting. 5. I/We understand that the approval of this application by the Planning & Zoning Board or staff in NO way constitutes approval of a Building Permit for Construction from the City of Apalachicola Building Department. 6. I/We understand that all changes to the approved scope of work stated in a Certificate of Appropriateness or Development Order application have to be approved by the P&Z Board before work commences on those changes. Making changes that have not been approved can result in a Stop Work Order being placed on the entire project and additional fees/penalties. 7. I/We understand that any decision of the P&Z Board may be appealed to the City Commission within 30 days after the decision by the P&Z Board; otherwise, the decision will be final. 8. I/We understand that a Certificate of Appropriateness is only valid for one year after issuance. They are renewable for six months without cause if requested, and for an additional six months upon showing of good cause by the applicant. The applicant must submit all requests for extensions in writing and provide appropriate support documents to City Staff, if needed. 9. I/We understand that P&Z Board approval is permission to obtain a permit for work and installation as indicated. I certify that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws 10. I/We understand that there will be no issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness without the property owner obtaining Homeowner's Association approval (if required) prior to the P&Z Board Meeting and/or before the beginning of an work and in no way authorizes work that is in violation of any association rules or regulations. 11. I/We understand that the City of Apalachicola will never request a P&Z fee greater than the amounts) outlined in the adopted fee schedule, nor will the City of Apalachicola request fee payment be made by wire transfer. Please contact City Hall directly with any guestions regarding fee payment. 0 3 2 7 2 0 DATE

Existing Fame on neighbors > House AuLly Patio 5/15 10g Carage ????. 2 6

STAFF FINDINGS REPORT PROPERTY OWNER: Josh Porter AGENT (if applicable): N/A PROPERTY ADDRESS (if available): 112 7th Street → Block 60 Lot 3 PARCEL ID: 01-09S-08W-8330-0060-0020 HISTORIC DISTRICT: Yes CORNER LOT: No ACREAGE: -- (~6,000 SF) FUTURE LAND USE: R-1 Single-Family Residential WETLANDS: No FLOODPLAIN: “AE” DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: → Installation of new 6’ wood fence with 4’ wood gates in the side and rear yard. STAFF FINDINGS: Code of Ordinances: → Section 111-288(e). o Requirements apply to all zoning districts and the historic district. a. Application for approval of any new fence or material alteration of an existing fence must be made in the same manner as for authorization of a building permit with a full description of materials to be used, dimensions and placement clearly stated on the plans. It is not necessary for a landscape architect or engineer to draw or sign and seal the plans. b. Fences shall be erected on the lot of the applicant and shall not extend into a public right-of-way. Fences may be erected within the required setback area (i.e., area between the front, side, and rear property lines and the front, side, and rear setback lines). c. A fence may abut but shall not be located on any property line. o All residential districts.

 No fence or wall in excess of four feet (48 inches) in height shall be allowed in the front yard (for corner lots, the two sides of the lot paralleling the two street). • The fence will not be located in the front yard.  A fence extending from the side of a principal structure to the side lot line shall attach to the structure no closer to the front lot line than where the facade (not including any covered front porch, uncovered porch, uncovered steps, and uncovered balconies) is located. These fences shall not exceed six feet (72 inches) in height. • The fence extending from the side of the house to the side lot line will not exceed 6’ in height.  No fence or wall in excess of six feet (72 inches) in height shall be allowed in side and/or rear yards. These fences may begin from the rear of the principal structure facade. • The 6’ fence in the rear yard will begin from the rear of the principal structure façade.  All fence construction, repair and replacement of any section or portion thereof must be consistent with the remaining fence on the property. The intent of this section is to ensure that all fencing erected on a property is uniform and consistent in construction and appearance. • All fencing proposed for the subject property is uniform in appearance. RECOMMENDATION: Approval, meets all requirements of the Code of Ordinances.

New Residential Construction 18 Adams Street

Rindler Residence Project 18 Adams Street Apalachicola February 23, 2026 I. Contact Information Michael Rindler Phone: 312-420-0937 Leslie Rindler Phone: 312-420-9171 Email: rindlergroup@aol.com Address: 109 Bay Avenue Apalachicola, FL 32320 II. Project Overview A. Historical Perspective In the 1920s-1930s, Apalachicola resident A.J. Zingarelli built a garage on the corner of Avenue F and 5th Street. The design of this building, now fallen into disrepair, is very appealing. We wish to build a new residence building with garage and storage space to be a modern interpretation of this historic Apalachicola building.

SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DESCRIPTION DATE: BY DATENO.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET TITLE: A-1 3/2/26 WARD DRAFTING, LLC 167 22ND AVENUE APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 RINDLER RESIDENCE 18 ADAMS STREET APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 PROJECT OVERVIEW NTS FRONT PERSPECTIVE REAR PERSPECTIVE DRAWING INDEX: BUILDING AREA: NOTES: - - - - - PLANS CAN BE PRINTED AT 200% ON 24"x36" PAPER FOR 1/4" SCALE FOUNDATION TYPE: SLAB LIVING AREA CEILING HEIGHT 8' 1 1/8" (VAULTED) GARAGE/ STORAGE CEILING HEIGHT 10' 1 1/8" 2x6 EXTERIOR WALLS A-1 PROJECT OVERVIEW A-2 SURVEY (BY OTHERS) A-3 SITE PLAN A-4 FLOOR PLAN A-5 ELEVATIONS A-6 FOUNDATION PLAN A-7 ROOF PLAN A-8 ELECTRICAL PLAN A-9 STRUCTURAL DETAILS GENERAL ZBW 01/25/261 GENERAL ZBW 02/08/262 906 SF H&C 990 SF GARAGE 805 SF STORAGE WALL HGT ZBW 02/15/263 FOUNDATION ZBW 03/01/264

SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DESCRIPTION DATE: BY DATENO.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET TITLE: A-2 3/2/26 WARD DRAFTING, LLC 167 22ND AVENUE APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 RINDLER RESIDENCE 18 ADAMS STREET APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 SURVEY (BY OTHERS) 1" = 20' GENERAL ZBW 01/25/261 GENERAL ZBW 02/08/262 WALL HGT ZBW 02/15/263 FOUNDATION ZBW 03/01/264

11' 26'-11" 24'-10" 10'-11" 33' N SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DESCRIPTION DATE: BY DATENO.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET TITLE: A-3 3/2/26 WARD DRAFTING, LLC 167 22ND AVENUE APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 RINDLER RESIDENCE 18 ADAMS STREET APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 GENERAL ZBW 01/25/261 GENERAL ZBW 02/08/262 SITE PLAN 1" = 20' GRAVEL DRIVEWAY WALL HGT ZBW 02/15/263 FOUNDATION ZBW 03/01/264

WH 30 28 5020 5020 30 3050 2630 3060 30 30603050 30 3050 1008010080 30 30 100801008010080 20 DN UP 26'-9" 6'-9" 11'-6" 11'-6" 6'-9" 26'-9" 2'-5" 22' 65'-7" 12'-11"17'-1"8' 8'-6" 13' 8'-6" 26'-9"18'-1"5'-5"9'-8"3'-4"5'-2"21'-7" 90' 7'-2"22'-10" 38' 30' STORAGE GARAGE RESIDENCE BATH KITCHEN COVERED PORCH SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DESCRIPTION DATE: BY DATENO.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET TITLE: A-4 3/2/26 WARD DRAFTING, LLC 167 22ND AVENUE APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 RINDLER RESIDENCE 18 ADAMS STREET APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'BUILDING AREA: 906 SF H&C 990 SF GARAGE 805 SF STORAGE GENERAL ZBW 01/25/261 GENERAL ZBW 02/08/262 10' CEIL. (TYP) A/C WATER SOFTENER MINI-SPLIT MINI-SPLIT WALL HGT ZBW 02/15/263 FOUNDATION ZBW 03/01/264 EQUIPMENT TO BE PLATFORM ELEVATED 1' ABOVE BFE VAULT NOTE: PROVIDE FLOOD VENTING PER CODE AT GARAGE AND STORAGE AREA VAULT

10' 6'-7 1/8" 8'-1 1/8" SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DESCRIPTION DATE: BY DATENO.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET TITLE: A-5 3/2/26 WARD DRAFTING, LLC 167 22ND AVENUE APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 RINDLER RESIDENCE 18 ADAMS STREET APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 ELEVATIONS 1/8" = 1' LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION GENERAL ZBW 01/25/261 GENERAL ZBW 02/08/262 TRUSS BRG 6 12 5 12 H.H. (TYP) METAL ROOF METAL SIDING (AS SPEC'D BY OWNER) WALL HGT ZBW 02/15/263 FOUNDATION ZBW 03/01/264

22' 2'-6" 63'-1" 30' 30'8' 38' 30' 39'-11" 50'-1" SHEET: SCALE: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: DESCRIPTION DATE: BY DATENO.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET TITLE: A-6 3/2/26 WARD DRAFTING, LLC 167 22ND AVENUE APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 RINDLER RESIDENCE 18 ADAMS STREET APALACHICOLA, FL 32320 FOUNDATION PLAN 1/8" = 1' GENERAL ZBW 01/25/261 GENERAL ZBW 02/08/262 3000 psi 4" CONC. SLAB w/ FIBER MESH ON 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER ON COMPACTED FILL. NOTE: ANY BEARING WALLS PER TRUSS ENGINEER TO HAVE A THICKENED SLAB UNDER. 8"x16" FOOTING w/ (2) #5 w/ #4 TIES @ 32" c-c STEP DOWN 24" 12"(w) x 24"(d) FOOTING w/ (4) #5s CONT. w/ #3 STIRRUPS @ 24" c-c WALL HGT ZBW 02/15/263 FOUNDATION ZBW 03/01/264 3000 psi 4" CONC. SLAB w/ FIBER MESH ON 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER ON COMPACTED FILL.

STAFF FINDINGS REPORT PROPERTY OWNER: Leslie Rindler AGENT (if applicable): N/A CONTRACTOR: Galloway Construction PROPERTY ADDRESS (if available): 18 Adams Street → Neels Addition Block 5 East 24’ Lot 3 and Lot 4 PARCEL ID: 01-09S-08W-8360-0005-0040 HISTORIC DISTRICT: No CORNER LOT: No ACREAGE: 0.4 (~17,424 SF) FUTURE LAND USE: R-2 Multi-family Residential WETLANDS: No FLOODPLAIN: “X” and “AE” DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: → Construction of a new single-family residential home with attached garage and storage space. STAFF FINDINGS: Code of Ordinances: → Section 111-269. R-2 Multifamily Residential. o Development standards:  Minimum lot size: • Single-family & home occupations: 6,000 SF (60’ x 100’).  Minimum building size: • Single-family: 800 SF.  Minimum building setbacks: • Front: 15 ft. • Side (interior lot): 7½ ft. each side, or any combination on each side that equals at least 15 ft. No such setback shall be less than 5 ft.

• Rear: 25 ft. (principal structure); 5 ft. (accessory structure). o All setbacks met per provided site plan (A-3).  Maximum building restrictions: • Lot coverage: 40% or ~6,970 SF. o Proposed: 2,701 SF  Heated and cooled: 906 SF.  Garage: 990 SF.  Storage: 805 SF. • Building height: 35 ft. → Section 111-288(i). Parking Requirements. o There shall be provided at the time of the erection of any principal building or structure parking space with adequate provisions for ingress and egress no less than the following space requirements.  Dwelling. One parking space for each dwelling unit or room for rent. • The attached garage will be used to meet the minimum parking requirement. → Sec. 115-1. City requirements. o Residential. Applications for all new residential development in special waterfront district or areas of special hazard (A&V zones) must include a stormwater management plan which may consist of a best management practice (BMP) as part of their site plan. Proposed improvements that increase lot coverage shall also provide for stormwater treatment by indicating the stormwater treatment best management practice that will be utilized.  Temporary stormwater controls shall be maintained until permanent controls are installed. Permanent controls, when required, shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. o Stormwater impacts shall be minimized by using site-suitable BMP's that maximize infiltration of stormwater and prevent or minimize offsite discharge. Stormwater flow paths for property as it is planned to be developed shall be determined and berms, shallow depressions, swales, contouring, terracing, landscaping, rain gardens, rain barrels, paving materials, concrete pavers and other stormwater management practices shall be included in the plan to intercept, infiltrate and treat stormwater before it reaches wetlands, surface waters or the city's stormwater conveyances.

 Combination of rain gardens and a swale will be used to minimize stormwater impacts on this site per provided stormwater management plan. → Sec. 115-2. Fill and lot grading requirements. o Up to ten cubic yards of fill. Fill as defined, lot grading and/or landscaping activities involving the deposition/addition, movement and placement of soils involving less than ten cubic yards of fill on an individual lot or parcel shall require a building permit and floodplain management permit. o More than ten cubic yards. Fill or lot grading involving more than the deposition of ten cubic yards of fill shall [require] a building permit and floodplain management permit. Additionally, the application requires a sealed grading plan prepared by a Florida licensed professional architect, surveyor, or engineer.  See LDC Sec. 115-2(1)(B) for full description of required grading plan. o No lot shall be filled to a height that would result in water being conveyed to an adjacent property. No fill shall be placed in city rights-of-way.  After site improvements are completed and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the city, when applicable, an "As Built" Certification from a Florida licensed engineer, surveyor or architect must demonstrate there will be no discharge of stormwater to adjacent properties and that the filled lot is not higher than the centerline of the road and the adjacent lot on all sides. RECOMMENDATION: Approval, meets all requirements of the Code of Ordinances.

Certificate of Appropriateness & Accessory Structure 196 7th Street

MARK MERCER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1117 JENKS AVENUE / PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA 32401 / 850.763.8072 bestwayPORTABLE BUILDINGS, INC.

MARK MERCER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1117 JENKS AVENUE / PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA 32401 / 850.763.8072

MARK MERCER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1117 JENKS AVENUE / PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA 32401 / 850.763.8072

STAFF FINDINGS REPORT PROPERTY OWNER: Bill & Sherryl Eckles AGENT (if applicable): N/A CONTRACTOR: Bestway Portable Buildings PROPERTY ADDRESS (if available): 196 7th Street (196 Dr Frederick S. Humphries Street) → Block 170 Lot 4 PARCEL ID: 01-09S-08W-8330-0170-0040 HISTORIC DISTRICT: Yes CORNER LOT: No ACREAGE: -- (~6,000 SF) FUTURE LAND USE: R-1 Single-Family Residential WETLANDS: No FLOODPLAIN: “X” DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: → Construction of a new 12’ x 20’ aluminum shed with attached 12’ x 20’ carport on improved parcel. STAFF FINDINGS: Code of Ordinances: → Section 111-268. R-1 Single-Family Residential. o Development standards:  Minimum lot size: • Single-family & home occupations: 6,000 SF (60’ x 100’).  Minimum building size: • Single-family: 800 SF.  Minimum building setbacks: • Rear: 5 ft. (accessory structure). o 22 ft. from rear property line. o 5 ft. from side one and 31 ft. from side two.  Maximum building restrictions: • Lot coverage: 40% or 2,400 SF.

o Existing: 1,322 SF o Proposed: 1,803 SF  Shed: 240 SF  Carport: 240 SF • Building height: 35 ft. o Applicable regulations:  In residential districts, and on any lot used for residential purposes, no accessory structure shall be located in required front yards. • The proposed accessory structure will not be located in the front yard. RECOMMENDATION: Approval, meets all requirements of the Code of Ordinances.

Fence 170 20th Avenue

Required fence location indicated by red line

STAFF FINDINGS REPORT PROPERTY OWNER: Brooke Evans AGENT (if applicable): N/A PROPERTY ADDRESS (if available): Mr. Fence of Florida → Block 246 Lots 1-3 PARCEL ID: 01-09S-08W-8330-0246-0010 HISTORIC DISTRICT: No CORNER LOT: Yes ACREAGE: -- (~9,000 SF) FUTURE LAND USE: R-2 Multi-family Residential WETLANDS: No FLOODPLAIN: “X” DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: → Installation of new 6’ white vinyl fence to replace existing metal and wood fence. o Placement of new fence on the property will not be the same as the existing fence. STAFF FINDINGS: Code of Ordinances: → Section 111-288(e). o Requirements apply to all zoning districts and the historic district. a. Application for approval of any new fence or material alteration of an existing fence must be made in the same manner as for authorization of a building permit with a full description of materials to be used, dimensions and placement clearly stated on the plans. It is not necessary for a landscape architect or engineer to draw or sign and seal the plans. b. Fences shall be erected on the lot of the applicant and shall not extend into a public right-of-way. Fences may be erected within the required setback area (i.e., area between the front, side, and rear property lines and the front, side, and rear setback lines).

c. A fence may abut but shall not be located on any property line. o All residential districts.  No fence or wall in excess of four feet (48 inches) in height shall be allowed in the front yard (for corner lots, the two sides of the lot paralleling the two streets). • The proposed fence will not be located in the front yard.  As required in section 111-288(b) above, front-yard fences on corner lots may not exceed two and one-half feet (30 inches) in height within 50 feet of the point of intersection of two streets. • The proposed fence will not be located in the front yard.  A fence extending from the side of a principal structure to the side lot line shall attach to the structure no closer to the front lot line than where the facade (not including any covered front porch, uncovered porch, uncovered steps, and uncovered balconies) is located. These fences shall not exceed six feet (72 inches) in height. • The proposed fence will attach to the side of the principal structure toward the front lot line, because the subject property is a corner lot.  No fence or wall in excess of six feet (72 inches) in height shall be allowed in side and/or rear yards. These fences may begin from the rear of the principal structure facade. • The requested 6’ fence may be permitted if it is attached to the house’s rear façade. See proposed alteration to the submitted site plan in red.  All fence construction, repair and replacement of any section or portion thereof must be consistent with the remaining fence on the property. The intent of this section is to ensure that all fencing erected on a property is uniform and consistent in construction and appearance. RECOMMENDATION: Approval on the condition that the fence on the street side (front lot line) must be attached to the rear of the principal structure, not the side.

Accessory Structure & Fence 197 14th Street

City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Application for Development/Site Plan Approval Official Use Only Date Received: _________ Meeting Date: __________ Fees Due: _____________ Date Fees Paid: _________ OWNER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner _________________________________________ Address ________________________________________ City _______________________ State _____ Zip ______ Phone _________________________________________ Contractor Name _________________________________ State License # ___________ City License # ___________ Email __________________________________________ Phone __________________________________________ PROJECT TYPE New Construction Fence Addition Repair Alteration/Renovation Variance Relocation Other ____________________________ _________________________________ Demolition Certificate of Appropriateness PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address (911 Address): ________________________________________________________________ City & State: ________________________________ Zip: ______________ Parcel ID #: _____________________________________________ Block: ______________ Lot: _________ Zoning District: _____________ [ ] Historic District [ ] Non-Historic District FEMA Flood Zone: _____________ OFFICIAL USE ONLY Certificate of Appropriateness Required? Y / N Setback Requirements of Property: Front: ______ Rear: ______ Side: ______ Corner Lot? Y /N Lot Coverage:_________ STAFF NOTES/RECOMMENDATIONS: ___________________________________________ This development request has been approved for a Certificate of Appropriateness (if applicable), zoning, land use, and development review by the City of Apalachicola Planning & Zoning Board and a building permit is authorized to be issued. City Staff ________________________________ Date Approved NOTE: This is a conceptual approval through the City based on our Land Development Code (LDC.) Please be aware that other documentation may be required by the Building Official. ______________ Applicant InitialJoseph Drew Robertson (GeoFlora Group, LLC)CGC153403324-176drew@geofloragroup.com/office@geofloragroup.com850-745-4226/850-210-9257xNew pole barnApalachicola32320197 14th St01-09s-08w-8330-0140-00701406,7xMichael and Constance SamsApalachicolaFL32320404-277-9025197 14th St (BL 6)