POLISCOPE

The public record

OAKLEY (CONTRACOSTA COUNTY)Decisions and attributed speech publishedPartial coverage

Jun 7, 2022 - 06:29 PM

Tuesday, June 7, 2022 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Jun 7, 2022 - 06:29 PM

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record and a transcript or captions are published for this meeting.

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Aug 3, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

This source published text without speaker turns, so speakers and timestamps are not shown.

>> ALL RIGHT. IT IS 6:30. WE WILL CALL TO ORDER. ROLL CALL. [ROLL CALL] >> AND I'M HERE. WE WILL NOW MOVE ONTO 1.2 AND WE'LL DO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE ALL STAND. [THE PLEDGE OF THE ALLEGIANCE] >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME WE'RE GOING TO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT THESE ARE GOING TO BE PUBLIC COMMENT ON NONAGENDA ITEMS AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT. YOU MAY FILL OUT A BLUE SPEAKER CARD. THE LIMIT OF PUBLIC COMMENT IS THREE MINUTES. THE TIME LIMITED IS MONITOR BY THE CHAIR'S SEAT. WHEN ONE MINUTE IS REMAINING THE TIMER WILL BEEP. COMPLETE THE COMMENT BEFORE YOUR TIME EXPIRES. I DO NOT SEE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. WE DO HAVE ONE ONLINE COMMENT THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND ALL THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE IT AND WE WILL SORRY. THIS WILL BE SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD. IT WILL NOT BE READ OUT LOUD UNLESS THE PERSON WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> DO I HAVE A SECOND? >> I SECOND THAT. SWEET. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. WE HAVE A FIRST AND SECOND. CAN I GET A VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THE OPPOSED -- PASSES UNANIMOUS. WE'LL MOVE ONTO PUBLIC HEARINGS. SO THIS IS ITEM 4.1 WHICH IS A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY AT 30 DELTA ROAD. 90 TALL PUBLIC WIRELESS DESIGNED AS FAUX WATER TANK. >> MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION BEFORE I TONIGHT A [READING] >> THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DELTA ROAD AND MAIN STREET. APPROXIMATELY.75 ACRE SITE. THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT WILL BE IN THE AREA IT IS APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET BY 40 FEET HIGHLIGHTED AT THE YELLOW AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT SITE. THE CURRENT GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY IS COMMERCIAL. IT IS WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WITHIN THE GENERAL DISTRICT. THERE IS A STUDY DONE THAT SHOWED AT&T. BRENTWOOD. SHOWING THAT THESE AREAS SUFFER FROM POOR WIRELESS COVERAGE. THE MAPS TO THE RIGHT SHOWS THE PUBLIC AREAS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY. THE REQUESTS INCLUDES APPROVAL OF A DESIGNER VIEW APPLICATION FOR 95 FOOT TALL. WITH 12 ANTENNAS. THE TOWER SHALL RESEARCH 95 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE WATER TANK LITTLE ENCLOSED APPROXIMATELY 27 FEET IN HIGH BY 23 FEET IN WIDTH. THE WATER TANK PLACED ON THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE. TOTALING 95 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE WATER TANK IS CONSTRUCTED OF FIBERGLASS. IT WILL BE PAINTED BROWN. HERE'S A IMAGINE OF THE EXISTING SITE. AND HERE'S THE TOWER. SO ORIGINALLY THE APPLICANT INSTALLED A 6 FEET CHAIN LEAK FENCE. HOWEVER THE COMMERCIAL GUIDELINES. CONDITION HAS BEEN PLACED WITHIN THE RESOLUTION REQUIRING THE APPLICANT TO INSTALL A DECORATIVE WALL. THE GENERAL STANDARDS FREESTANDING WIRELESS FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED TOY INSTALL LANDSCAPING. THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AS A PART OF PROJECT DUE TO THE CALIFORNIA DRILL. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED. ULTIMATELY, EXCUSE ME. WAS CONDUCTED AS A PART OF PROJECT NOTED THE NOISE LEVEL RANGES. WITH THE INSTALLATION OF A SOLID WALL THE DECIBEL LEVELS -- OVERALL THE PROPOSED DESIGN VIEW CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPT THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROJECT. THAT CONCLUDES PRESENTATION. I'LL BE MORE HAPPY TO TAKE QUESTIONS. THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >> DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? I HAVE TWO. DO YOU KNOW THE HEIGHT OF THE CURRENT WATER TOWER THAT WE HAVE ON THE MAIN STREET AND THE HEIGHT OF THE TREE THE FAUX TREE THAT WE HAVE AT THE? >> NOT OFFHAND. I'LL LOOK IT UP. >> THE TWO QUESTIONS TWO DIFFERENT SITES I'M SORRY THE THIRD I KNOW A FEW MONTHS BACK WE HAD A PROPOSED DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE SHOPPING CENTER DOWN BY EMERSON I WAS WONDERING WHAT THE PROPOSED WATER TOWER? I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT U UNIFORM IT WILL BE. >> WE'LL HAVE TO LOOK INTO THAT. EACH WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY AS LONG AS THE PROJECT OR THE REQUEST SHOW THAT THE HEIGHT IS REQUIRED FOR AMOUNT OF COVERAGE THEY NEED. >> THANK YOU. WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE SEE IF ANY COMMENTS THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO BRING FORWARD. NO. OKAY. SO AND THEN SORRY. WE WILL THEN RECEIVE OPEN UP WITH ANYONE WITH COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. SEEING NONE WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO DELIBERATIONS. >> I'LL SECOND IT. >> ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A FIRST AND SECOND. WOULD YOU LIKE TO DELIBERATION? WE'LL TAKE A VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR. I- AYE. IT LOOKS LIKE IT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. AND NOW WE WILL MOVE ONTO OUR REGULAR CALENDAR. ADOPT A RESOLUTION. CITY CLERK. >> GOOD EVENING CHAIR VICE CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS TO APPOINT A PLANNING COMMISSIONER TO THE TRANSPLAN COMMITTEE. THIS IS A POSITION THAT HAS BEEN HELD FORMERLY BY ONE OF OUR COUNCILMEMBERS AND UPON THE PLANNING COMMISSION BECOMING ACTIVATED AGAIN. THE REQUEST WAS MADE AND THE OPPORTUNITY PROVIDED FOR PERHAPS A PLANNING COMMISSIONER TO ASSUME THAT ROLE. SO THE TRANSPLAN COMMITTEE COORDINATES THE TRANSPORTATION INTEREST. INCLUDING THE CITIES. ELECTED OFFICIALS AND PLANNING COMMISSIONER SIT ON THE COMMITTEE AND CURRENTLY VICE MAYOR. AT THIS TIME IF THE PLEASES THE COMMISSION YOU MIGHT WANT TO DISCUSS WHO MAY WISH TO BE POINT TODD THAT POSITION AND THEN MAKE A MOTION. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >> DO WE HAVE ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOLUNTEER THEMSELVES? IF NOT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE THAT IF EVERYBODY UNLESS SOMEBODY WHO WOULD LIKE TO. NO. ALL RIGHT. MAKE A MOTION ON THAT. ALL RIGHT. MAKE A MOTION. >> CAN I MAKE A MOTION FOR YOU POINT MADAM CHAIRMAN REPRESENT TRANS -- >> I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. >> ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A FIRST AND SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. PASSES UNANIMOUSINGLY. WE WILL MOVE ONTO 5.2 WHICH IS THE CITY OF OAKLEY ADOPTING RULES PROCEDURE FOR IS TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS. >> I DON'T HAVE A THOROUGH REPORT OUT. I THINK IT'S PRETTY WELL STATE INED YOUR STAFFER REPORT BUT THIS ITEM IS A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT RULES OF ORDER. TO TRANSACT BUSINESS AS A PLANNING COMMISSION. IT'S AUTHORIZED UNDER OUR MUNICIPAL CODE. AND I'VE PROPOSED ADOPTING THE ROSENBERG'S RULES OF ORDER. SEEMS USER FRIENDLY SET OF RULES SO YOU CAN ALL UNDERSTAND YOUR POSITION AS COMMISSIONERS AND WHAT THAT ENTAILS THE ROLE THAT STAFF PLAYS AS WELL AS THE CITY ATTORNEY. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. AND AGAIN THE CONSOLIDATED RULES ARE A PATCHED ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION BEEN >> DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? HAVE EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TO READ THOSE. CAN I ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. OH WAIT. MY APOLOGIES. I MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE ROSENBERG'S RULES OF ORDER. MAY I HAVE A FIRST. ALL IN FAVOR. ANY -- LOOKS LIKE IT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE'LL MOVE ONTO 5.3. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE FISCAL YEAR 22/23 AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT. >> MADAM CHAIR OUR PUBLIC WORKS HE'S HERE TO PROVIDE THE PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. KEVIN ROHANI. >> MADAM CHAIR VICE CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION IT'S MY PLEASURE TO PRESENT YOU HIGHLIGHT OF OUR FISCAL YEAR 22/23 PROGRAM. WE HAVE MADE THIS PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCILLING AT THE LAST MEETING. THIS IS A PART OF OUR BUDGET REVIEW PROCESS REVIEW ANNUALLY FOR THE CITY. HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF OUR PROJECTS. WE WORK VERY HARD TO COME UP WITH THE CAPITAL PROGRAM THAT ADDRESSES WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY NEEDS STREETS FACILITIES PARKS. ONE OF OUR FOCUS NOT JUST BUILD THE STREETS OR BUILD THE PARK AND BOTH SHORT TERM AND LONG-TERM. I'LL HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE PROJECTS AS WE GO THROUGH STARTING WITH OUR STREETS PROGRAM. ONE OF THE AREAS OF THE COMMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN MENTIONED STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAST SIDE FIRST CORRIDOR. EMERSON RANCH EACH -- ONE OF OUR KEY PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN RIGHT NOW AND PLAN LATER IN THE FALL CITY COUNCIL CONTRACT IS THAT SECTION OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD THIS IMPROVES THIS AREA BY BUILDING THE SIX LANE ROY SIDEWALKS IMPROVEMENT UTILITIES ALL CITY STANDARDS THAT GO TODAY IS NONEXISTENCE AND AGAIN FOLLOWING THE PATTERN OF IMPROVEMENTS WE STARTED SEVERAL YEARS AGO FROM EMERSON RANCH HEADING EASTWARD. THIS PROJECT AGAIN COMPLETES IT BRINGS IN IMPROVEMENT TO JERSEY ISLAND ROAD. OTHER DEVELOPMENT GRANT CYPRESS PRESERVE YOU'VE HEARD ABOUT IT. BUILD THE ROY IN CYPRESS. THERE'S AN ISLAND. SO THAT'S COMING THIS IS A PRECLUDE TO THAT CITY IMPROVEMENT. WE HAVE ALSO YOU'VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT SECONDARY ACCESS. THE PROJECT THAT IN FRONT OF YOU WILL EXTEND ISLAND ROAD. DEAD END AT EAST CYPRESS ROAD. THE DEVELOPER BUILD ISLAND ROAD FROM EAST CYPRESS ROAD TO BUILD IT BRIDGE ACROSS AND THIS PROJECT WILL TAKE THAT ROAD HALF A MILE FROM ALL THE WAY TO DELTA ROAD. THIS PROVIDES A MOST SECONDARY EXITS OUT OF THE AREA AND THIS PROJECT WOULD REQUIRE ACQUISITION. IT'S A PROCESS WE'VE DONE THIS PROJECT WE KNOW HOW TO DO IT. WE'LL SEE IT THROUGH. WE ARE ALSO GOING TO BE COLLABORATING WITH CURRENTLY THE TWO LARGERS DEVELOPERS IN THAT AREA WHO ARE BUILDING THE CYPRESS AND SOME OF LAKE NORTH CONTRIBUTION TOWARD THIS ROY CONSTRUCTION. MOVING BACK A LITTLE BIT MORE FURTHER INTO THE CENTER OF THE TOWN A LOT OF ROAD. AGAIN, A LOT OF PEOPLE RIGHT NOW TODAY EAST CYPRESS ROAD BASICALLY THE ONLY IN AND OUT WAY OUT OF THE AREA INFORM GET TO GO TO MAIN STREET MAKE A TURN. THIS PROJECT WILL EXTEND [INDECIPHERABLE] >> ACROSS RAILROAD TRACK THE EAST SELLER'S AVENUE A NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL WILL BE BUILT. WE'LL HAVE A NEW STRUCTURE. ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACK. THIS PROJECT SIMILAR TO THE EXTENSION OF THE ISLAND ROAD. WIDE OPEN TERRITORY. WORK THROUGH MULTITUDE PROCESS TO THE COUNTY AND THE RAILROAD AGENCIES. IT WILL TAKE A NUMBER OF YEARS BUT WE STARTED THE PROCESS. WE'LL HAVE DONE THE DESIGN ON THERE PROJECT. THAT WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL A WEEK FROM TONIGHT. ANOTHER SECTION OF LAUREL ROAD INTERSECTION OF LAUREL AND OWE HAIR RA [PHONETIC SPELLING] >> COMING EASTWARD TOWARD. THAT AREA IS VINEYARD WE'VE SEEN AS THE LARGE POWER ADMINISTRATION THAT'S BEEN LIKE -- WE ARE WORKING THE PROPERTY OWNER THE VINEYARD OWNER TO ACQUIRE THAT STRIP OF LAND ALONG LAUREL AND OWE HARE RA TO BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT THESE IMPROVEMENTS ESSENTIALLY WIDEN THE ROY TO A CITY STANDARD TULANE WITH CURB. WE'LL START THAT DESIGN LATE THEY ARE SUMMER. IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME WORKING THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION IT'S NOT A QUICK AND CHEAP PROCESS. IT WILL TAKE US PROBABLY TWO YEARS OR SO TO GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS GET THE SO WE'RE LOOKING ABOUT THREE TO FOUR YEARS BEFORE LAUREL ROAD IS WIDEN THAT AREA AND WITH THAT ALL THE WAY TO HIGHWAY 4 TO FOUR LANE ROY. ALL FOR THE FUTURE OF THE COMMUNITY AS WE HAVE MORE RESIDENTS COMING IN. HAVE MORE ACCESS IN AND OUT OF THE COMMUNITY. FOCUSING BACK COME BEING BACK FURTHER INLAND DOWNTOWN AREA. WE HAVE SOME FEATURE AND GOOD VERY GOOD PROJECTS IN THE WORKS FOR QUITE SOME TIME I CALL THEM THE DOWNTOWN INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. YOU CAN PUT THE RENDERING ON THE SCREEN. YOU SEE THE DOWNTOWN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AS WE CALL IT. THERE ARE BASICALLY TWO MAJOR PROJECTS IN OUR TOWN DOWN ONE OF THEM IS FINAL DESIGN STAGE ONE OF THEM IN THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE RIGHT NOW. THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION STAGE IS SECTION OF DOWNTOWN WHICH IS THE EXTENSION OF FROM MAIN STREET CURRENTLY GOING NORTH AND MAKING A LEFT TURN COME BEING BACK NEAR THE ACE SHOPPING CENTER AND A PARKING LOT RENDERING THIS PARKING LOT NO. 2 THAT'S BEEN CONSTRUCTS AS WE SPEAK WHICH WILL COMPLIMENT THE BRAND NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION OVER THE NEXT TWO WEEKS YOU'LL SEE BUILDING COMING OFF THE GROUND YOU WILL FOUNDATION HAS BEEN DONE. THIS WILL REALLY ENHANCE OUR DOWNTOWN BOTH FROM THE COMMERCIAL FOR THE COMMUNITY BUT ALSO VISITORS CAN COME ENJOY DOWNTOWN OAKLEY CLOSE TO OUR CIVIC CENTER A NUMBER OF ACTIVITIES IS PARK. THE NEW PARKING LOT WILL COMPLIMENT IT. THIS PROJECT ANTICIPATE WILL BE COMPLETED LATER THIS SUMMER. THE OTHER PROJECT FROM EXTENSION OF GO EASTWARD IS A NEW ROY THAT'S GOING TO BE BUILT ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACK AND GOING BEHIND THE CURRENT BUILDING AND CIRCLING SECONDED AVENUE. DRIVERS CAN COME ON SECOND AVENUE ENTRANCE. THIS IS GOING TO BE THE DROP OFF FOR THE NEW PLATFORM STATION IN THE EXHIBIT SHOWING PURPLE. THAT PROJECT IS BEING BUILT BY THE AMTRAK AND SOME RAILROAD AUTHORITY WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. AGAIN, DESIGN CONCURRENTLY. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A VERY BEAUTIFUL GATEWAY PLAZA AROUND THE BUILDING AND RENDERING SLOWS IN GREEN AND THEN OWE HAIR A AVENUE WE EXTEND IT SO BUSSES AND CARS DROP OFF PASSENGERS FROM SECOND COME BACK ON OWE HAIR A OR STAY ON THE ROAD ALONG THE RAILROAD COME BACK AND COME OUT CLOSER TO THE CIVIC CENTER ENTRANCE. ALSO WE'RE GOING TO BE IMPROVING ARE THE DROP OFF AREA WHICH IS AS YOU SEE IN THE RENDERING THIS PARKING LOT ONE. SO WE WOULD CREATE ADDITIONAL PARKING ALL GOING TO HAVE CHARGING STATIONS FOR THE LATEST BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. BUT AGAIN AS YOU SEE THIS IS OVERALL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS A LOT SAID JUST BUILDING PARKING LOT. THIS WILL GO A LONG WAY NOT ONLY BEAUTIFUL DOWNTOWN OAKLEY ALSO BUILDING STRUCTURE THAT WILL LAST YEARS AND DECADES TO COME. ENHANCE THE COMMUNITY. SO THIS IS OUR PROJECT AGAIN THE FIRST ONE THAT I MENTIONED ONLY CONSTRUCTION YOU'LL SEE MORE OF IT IN THE COMING DAYS. WE'LL BE FINISHED BY SUMMER. THE PROJECT TO THE RIGHT RAILROAD TRACK GATEWAY PLAZA THE OTHER PARKING LOT IS UNDER DESIGN WE'LL BRING IT TO CITY COUNCIL TOWARD THE END OF THIS YEAR. AND START CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATE IN EARLY 2023. CONCURRENT WITH THAT, THE RAILROAD AGENCIES ARE DESIGNING THE PLATFORM STATION THAT'S ALL FULLY DESIGNED. THERE'S BEEN SOME CONFUSION AFTER THAT CITY PAYING FOR THE RAILROAD. WE ARE NOT ACTUALLY HAVE A GRANT FEDERAL GRANT FOR THAT. SO EVERYBODY PAYS AND BUILDS THEIR SIDE OF IT BUT BOTH PROJECTS ARE TRACKING WELL AND WE EXPECT CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN ON THOSE PROJECTS EARLY NEXT YEAR AND INTO END OF 2023 POSSIBLY EARLY 2024 AGAIN MAJOR, MAJOR ENHANCEMENTS FOR DOWNTOWN OAKLEY. WITH THAT TALKS ABOUT SOME OF OUR FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. HAVE YOU SOME PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT I THINK IS WORTH MENTIONING. THIS PARK IS GOING TO BE AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARPENTER ROAD AND ROSE AVENUE. BRAND NEW DEVELOPMENTS AS A PART OF THE PARKING -- FOR YOUR INFORMATION DEVELOPERS BUILT PARKS IN OAKLEY. BASED HOW MUCH THEY HAVE TO PAY. DEVELOPER A HAS PARKING MILLION DOLLAR THEY BUILD A PARK OR MILLION DOLLAR. THAT'S THE THRESHOLD. THIS AREA A VERY NICE PARK. PARKING LOT NEEDS -- WE TOOK INSTEAD OF DEVELOPER BUILDING DEVELOPER WILL PAY THE PARKING PACK FEE FUND SUPPLEMENT WITH OUR OWN PARKING PACK FEE AND ACTUALLY DESIGN BUILDING A PARK THAT'S NEIGHBORHOOD MEET THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY. YOU'LL SEE END OF NEXT YEAR WE'LL DESIGN AND BUILD THAT PARK MORE HOUSE AND AS WE SPEAK SO THERE WILL BE MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TO THE COMMUNITY IN THAT AREA. AT PARK SHADE STRUCTURES. REMEMBER NOT TOO LONG AGO DOG PARK. WE PLANTED THE TREES IT TAKES TIME FOR THE TREES TO GROW BUT FOLKS WANT IMMEDIATE SATISFACTION COUNCIL GREED FUNDING WE'LL BE BUILDING SOME SHADE STRUCTURES AS PEOPLE TAKE THEIR DOGS FOR EXERCISE THEY CAN SIT IN SHADED AREA. HOLLY CREEK PARK. IS A PARK THAT WE'RE GOING TO ENHANCE AT MULTIPLE LEVEL. LAST YEAR WE HAD A PROJECT STILL WE'RE GOING TO BUILD THE RESTROOM STRUCTURE OVER SUMMER SIMILAR TO WE HAVE A CIVICCER CENTER PARK A DOG PARK PREFAB BUILDING. OVER A YEAR AGO BECAUSE OF THE EVERYTHING THAT'S HAPPENING IN THE WORLD IT'S BEEN DELAYED. THE CONTRACTOR MANUFACTURE TOLD US THEY'LL DELIVER THE BUILDING BY JULY. WE'LL INSTALL IT AND AS A PART OF THIS FISCAL YEAR 2020/23 WE'LL APPLY FOR A GRANT $200 -- WE'RE GOING TO PUT THE SAME TILE SYSTEM THAT INSTALLED AT AWER CIVIC CENTER PLAYGROUND. IT WAS HIGHLY SUCCESSFULLER. THAT WILL BE A MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TO THE PARK. HEAVE USED BY ALL TYPES OF FOLKS. ONCE WE FINISH THE PARK THE PLAYGROUND AND THE RESTROOM FACILITIES WHEN PEOPLE GO TO PLAY THERE'S A PROPER RESTROOM FACILITY. ON OUR FACILITIES FRONT WE ARE GOING TO BE INSTALLING SOLAR PANEL ON THE ROOF OF CIVIC CENTER. THIS PROJECT WILL AGAIN SAVE THE CITY LONG-TERM SAVE MONEY. ELECTRICITY FOR THE CIVIC CENTER NEEDS. WE'RE GOING TO BE INSTALLING EMERGENCY GENERATOR AT RECREATION CENTER LARGE FACILITY THAT'S USED HEAVILY AND EMERGENCY POWER OUT RAJ IN CASE IT SHUTS DOWN. WE HAVE EMERGENCY GENERATOR HERE. WE'RE INSTALL ONE OVER AT THAT FACILITY. AGAIN THIS CONCLUDES SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THERE'S LOT MORE PROJECTS SOME OF THE SMALLER LARGE EVERY PROJECT TAKES TIME. WE'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY ENSURE SHORT TERM AND LONG-TERM I'LL ADDRESS SOME OF YOUR PROJECT. IT WILL TAKE A NUMBER OF YEARS. ONCE IT'S DONE THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITY WILL GO FROM DECADES TO COME. YEARS TO COME. THIS CONCLUDES MY REPORT. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? VICE CHAIR CHUIKO. >> YES I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS. THE FIRST ONE LET'S SEE STREET REPAIR AND RESURFACING PROJECT. I WAS CURIOUS IF WE HAVE SELLERS AVENUE PORTION BEING INCORPORATED IN THAT $2 MILLION IT BEING A VERY HEAVILY TRAVELED ROAD WITH ALL THE NEW NEIGHBORHOODS PEOPLE COMMUNITY AND A LOT OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. IT'S IN NEED SOME RESURFACING IN THE FUTURE. I WAS CURIOUS IS THAT'S SOMETHING BEING INCLUDED IN THIS PACKAGE AND THE OTHER QUESTION THAT I HAD I WAS CURIOUS WHAT DOES DEPARTMENT REMODELING PROJECT ENTAIL? >> YES, OUR ANNUAL RESURFACING PROGRAM WE A WIDE RANGE OF PROJECT IN THE COMMUNITY. SELLERS WENT OVER IT PATCHED OVER THE YEARS. IT NEEDS MORE PATCHING. THE VOLUME OF TRAFFIC THAT COMING TO WE NEED TO KEEP UP WITH THE CONDITION OF OUR STREETS MAKE THEM VERY GOOD CONDITION. LAST YEAR WE FINISHED THE MAJOR RESURFACING LAUREL ROAD FROM EMPIRE TO OWE HAIR A. NEEDED MAJOR FACELIFT. WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT THE NUMBER OF ROADS AND TO DO RESURFACING. SURFACE VARIES SOME NEED OVERLAY. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION YES. UNDER FACILITIES ON HR CURRENTLY DEPARTMENT WHEN YOU WALK INTO THE CITY HALL ADMINISTRATION SIDE THERE'S TWO OFFICES AND THEN THE MIDDLE AREA KIND OF AN OPEN CUBICLE. REALLY FROM A PRIVACY PERSPECTIVE WHEN FOLKS COME IN AND THEY WANT TO HAVE HR CONVERSATION HYBRID OR SOMETHING KINETIC DISCUSS IN THE LOBBY. WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT HOW TO RECONFIGURE THE AREA BEHIND US TO HAVE A MORE SECURE AREA OF PEOPLE TO COME IN THE STAFF OR CUSTOMERS DOING INTERVIEWS. LET'S SAY YOU HAVE A JOB INTERVIEW. YOU HAVE ONE THURSDAY PEOPLE SIT IN LOBBY AND WE HAVE MULTIPLY THERE'S NO SENSE OF PRIVACY. PLAN TO RECONFIGURE THAT AREA WE HAVE CITY CLERK OPERATION THERE'S MULTIPLE IT OPERATIONS. TRYING TO SEE HOW WE CAN CONFIGURE FRONT OF THE HOUSE IF YOU WILL AND A.COM DATES BETTER SERVICE BOTH FOR EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL CUSTOMERS AND JUST A BETTER OVERALL SERVICE. >> QUESTIONS? >> SO JUST REALLY QUICKLY CAN YOU REFRESH MY REKS WHAT IS LAUREL EXPANSION LOOK LIKE? IS IT GOING TO BE A TRAFFIC LIGHT REALLY HIGH LEVEL? >> NO AGAIN THAT'S PROBABLY ONE OF OUR LARGEST PROJECTS. LAUREL RIGHT NOW MAKES A -- [INDECIPHERABLE] >> THE ROY ELEVATE OVER THE RAILROAD NO SIGNAL. RIGHT NOW IT GO OVER RAILROAD TRACK GOING TO BE A BRIDGE OVER THE RAILROAD ONCE IT LAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACK. THEY'LL BE A FOUR LANE ROY THAT WILL GO ALL THE WAY TO SELLERS. THERE WILL BE MORE THAN LIKELY A TRUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. ONE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT SELLERS. >> SO SIMILAR TO VINTAGE PARKWAY. >> YES. >> THANK YOU. >> RIGHT NOW BASICALLY CROSSING PROHIBITED BY THE RAILROAD UNLESS THE COMMUNITY IF YOU SAY I WANT TO HAVE A CROSSING HERE RAILROAD SAY YOU HAVE TO ELIMINATE ANOTHER ONE SOMEWHERE ELSE. >> ALL RIGHT. ANYMORE QUESTIONS? WE'RE GOING UP PUBLIC COMMENT. I HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD. >> HELLO PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIR SHAW AND VICE CHAIR CHUIKO AND REST OF THE COMMISSIONERS. CONGRATULATIONS FOR RESTARTING AND GETTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION BACK UP AND RUNNING. I THINK THAT'S FANTASTIC. ACCORDING TO CI. SES I THINK I'M NOT SURE BUT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU COULD REFRESH ME OR LET ME KNOW IS IT THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WOULD INITIATE CHANGES IN SORT OF DESIGN GUIDELINES? I'M PRETTY SURE IT'S THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WOULD INITIATE THOSE SORTS OF THINGS. ITEMS SUCH THE ENERGY STRATEGIC PLAN WRITTEN BY PG&E. AS A CITIZEN WHO CARES ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THE PLANET IT WILL BE NICE IF WE COULD OPEN UP THESE CONVERSATIONS AND BEGIN THESE CONVERSATIONS. I BELIEVE IT STARTS WITH YOU. I FIND OUT HOW TO DO IT AND MAYBE GET IT GOING. WE ARE BASICALLY THE ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF OAKLEY OR OUT THERE. THERE'S GOING TO BE NO ROOM FOR FUTURE GROWTH UNLESS OF COURSE WE GET JERSEY ISLAND. RIGHT. BASICALLY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE BUILT OUT. THE SOONER WE CAN TAKE CARE OF THESE ITEMS THAT WOULD BE CLIMATE CONSCIENTIOUS THE BETTER. ALSO THE CONNECTION FROM BETHEL HIGHWAY. THE CITY HAS NOT HAD AN OPEN COMMUNICATION. IF YOU DRIVE DOWN DELTA ROAD WHERE IT WILL CONNECT YOU'LL SEE THAT IS A VERY COUNTRY AREA AND THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE USING THAT ROAD ON A REGULAR BASIS PEOPLE ON BUY RON HIGHWAY SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN THAT CONVERSATION. IT'S GOING TO OPEN UP IN OUR AREA WHICH IS OUT OF CONTROL. SO PARK IMPROVEMENTS. JERSEY ISLAND. THE RIGHT AWAY ACQUISITIONS. THESE ARE CONVERSATIONS I'M HOPING YOU WILL PURSUE A DEEPER CONVERSATION THAT WILL BE MORE PUBLIC. IF YOU WENT TO THE PLANNING ACCOMPLICING BACK IN THE EARLY DAY BACK IN 2010 TO 20 -- 2005. THEY USED TO REALLY UNCAP THESE THINGS AND REALLY DELVE INTO THE ISSUES. IT SEEMS THE COMMUNITY WILL REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. AGAIN CONGRATULATIONS AND FINE JOB. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> OKAY. AND SO WITH THAT I'M GOING TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION AND [INDECIPHERABLE] >> MADAM CHAIR IMPACT >> NO MOTION. I KNOW. I'M LOOKING. I'M READING HERE. >> THE RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE THE REPORT. THANK YOU >> ALL RIGHT DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTION THAT WE NEED -- WE DON'T HAVE ANY. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO INFORMATIONAL REPORTS. SO ITEM 6.1 WILL BE THE PRESENTATION OF THE 23/31 HOUSE IS ITING ELEMENT UPDATE. >> THANK YOU, VERY MUCH. SO TONIGHT WE HAVE SHE'S WITHIN SENT ENVIRONMENT HOUSING UPDATE CONSULTANTS. AT THE PUBLIC WORKSHOP. SHE HAS PROVIDED A PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WE THOUGHT IT WILL BE A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO BRING ALL THIS INFORMATION AND DOWNLOAD IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS WELL. I'M HAPPY TO DO THE SLIDES AND YOU HAVE A REMOTE. THANK YOU. >> GOOD EVENING. DIRECTOR OF URBAN DESIGN. I'M GOING TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT. IT MIGHT BE A REFRESH THOSE OF YOU WHO WERE AT THE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND THERE'S SOME NEW INFORMATION TONIGHT. SO JUST FIRST STARTING WITH AN OVERVIEW WHAT'S THE HOUSING ELEMENT? EVERY CITY IN COUNTY AND CALIFORNIA IS REQUIRED TO ADOPT HOUSING ELEMENT. AND WE CALL IT AN ELEMENT BECAUSE IT'S AN ELEMENT OR A CHAPPERRER OF YOUR GENERAL PLAN. THE HOUSING ELEMENT IS THE CITY'S PLAN FOR HOW IT'S GOING TO MEET THE HOUSING NEEDS OF YOUR COMMUNITY RESIDENTS BUT ALSO YOUR SHARE OF THE PROJECTED REGIONAL HOUSING. IT HAS TO BE UPDATED. IT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM THE GENERALLY PLAN. THERE'S NO MAN DECREASED WHEN YOU UPDATE IT. THE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATED. THE HOUSING ELEMENTS THE ONLY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN THAT'S REVIEWED AND CERTIFIED BY THE STATE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THE STATE DEPARTMENT THAT'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT REVIEW. A LOT OF INFORMATION GOES INTO THE HOUSING ELEMENTS. PRETTY DENSE DOCUMENT. WE START BY DOING ANALYSIS OF YOUR EXIST AND YOUR PROJECTED HOUSING NEEDS AND THAT INCLUDES HOUSING NEEDS OF SPECIAL NEEDS GROUPS WITHIN YOUR COMMUNITY SENIOR LARGE HOSE HOLDS PEOPLE THAT HAVE SPECIAL NEEDS. WE DO A DETAIL INVOICE OF ALL THE LAND. WE HAVE TO ANALYZE ANY POTENTIAL CONSTRAINT. WE HAVE TO EVALUATE YOUR PROGRESS AND YOUR SUCCESS IN IMPLEMENTING. BASED ON THAT EVALUATION AND INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY THE DECISION MAKER AND CHANGES IN STATE LAW WE UPDATE YOUR HOUSING THE DOCUMENTS YOUR PROGRAMS YOUR GOALS YOUR POLICIES. IT'S ABOUT PROVIDING ENOUGH HOUSING SITES ASSISTING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSE AND REMOVING CONSTRAINT A LOT OF REQUIRED TOPICS THAT HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED. AND THIS IS REALLY BECOMING THE MAIN FOCUS OF THE STATE AND THIS HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE CYCLE REFER TO EACH UPDATE AS A CIRCLE. WHAT AB 6. WHAT THAT MEANS TAKING MEANINGFUL ACTIONS TO COMBAT DISCRIMINATION OVERCOME PATTERNS OF SEGREGATION AND ENSURE THAT ALL COMMUNITY MEMBERS HAVE EQUILATERAL ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY. THERE'S GOING TO BE A LOT OF ANALYSIS THAT GOES INTO THIS A LOT OF DEMOGRAPHIC DATA. IT END UP BEING AN 80 PAGE REPORT. AND THEN BASED ON ALL THAT ANALYSIS THE STATE REALLY WANTS TO SEE SOME MEANINGFUL ACTIONS BEING TAKEN BY CITIES TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES. SORRY. CAN YOU GO BACK ONE. THERE IT IS. THE SCHEDULE. SO HERE WE ARE IN JUNE. AS KEN MENTIONED I PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN MARCH A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO WE WERE FOCUSED ON SOME PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY SITES. WE THEN IN APRIL AT A COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND HAD AN ONLINE SURVEY AND THE COLLECTED FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY WE'RE GETTING READY TO PUBLISH THE DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 12TH. I'LL GO INTO SOME OF THE NEXT STEPS AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION. SO OUR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SO FAR I MENTIONED WE HAD A WORKSHOP APRIL 20TH CONDUCTED IN PERSON WE HAD ABOUT 20 PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE. AND WE REALLY FOCUSED ON WE HAD MAPS WE SAT AROUND THE TABLE AND LOOKED AT SOME POTENTIAL NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY SITES. I'LL TALK ABOUT THAT IN SOME DETAIL TONIGHT. AND THEN THE SURVEY WAS AVAILABLE FROM APRIL 20TH TO MAY 27TH. WE GOT 227 RESPONSES AND ALL THAT HAVE WILL BE SUMMARIZED IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT DOCUMENT BUT YOU GOT FEEDBACK ON GENERAL HOUSING ISSUES AND ALSO THOSE POTENTIAL AHO SITES AS WELL. I'LL TOUCHER ON SOME OF THE KEYS FACT FROM OUR HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSIS. IN NA ASSESSMENT WE LOOK AT TRANS RELATED TO POPULATION AND HOUSING GROWTH AND OAKLEY HAS REALLY BEEN ONE OF THE FASTEST GROWING CITIES. DEFINITELY WITHIN COUNTY AND THE REGION GROWING IN A MUCH HIGHER RATE THAN SURROUNDING JURISDICTIONS. BETWEEN 200 AND 2020 THE POPULATION INCREASED ABOUT 25 THOUSAND RESIDENTS TO OVER 42000 RESIDENTS. I'M NOT REALLY GOOD WITH THESE BUTTONS. BETWEEN 2010 AND 2021 THE CITY BUILT ALMOST 1900 NEW HOUSING UNITS. AND DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTIZE ARE THE DOMINATE TYPE IN OAKLEY MAKING UP ABOUT 91 PERCENT OF THE CITY HOUSING STALK. MULTIPLYY FAMILY MAKE UP 4 PERCENT OF THE STALK AND ONE OF THE STATE'S GOALS IN THIS HOUSING ELEMENT TO ENSURE THAT THERE ARE VARIETY OF HOUSE TYPES IN COMMUNITIES TO MEET THE NEEDS. FOR A BROADER VARIETY OF HOUSING. YOU CAN SEE HERE TRENDS IN HOME VALUES ACROSS THE REGION DATA ON HOME VALUES FROM ZILLOW. IT'S PROBABLE FAMILIAR WITH MOST PEOPLE. HOME PEAK 2006. DROPPED WHEN THE MARKET CRASHED AND REBOUNDED PRETTY QUICKLY. OAKLEY REMAINS A RELATIVELY AFFORDABLE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO THE LARGER REGION THE MEDIUM HOME VALUE IS LIAR THAN EVER. YOU CAN SEE HERE IN 2020 THE MEDIUM WAS 6 AND 31,000. MEDIAN RENTS HAVE BEEN INCREASING ACROSS THE STATE THE REGION THE VARIATION HERE IN OAKLEY BECAUSE YOU HAVE A SMALLER STALK OF RENTALS. SOMEERROR RENTS HAVE BEEN INCREASING NOT QUITE AT THE SATE RATE AND THE BAY AREA REGION. AND RENTERS WOULD NEED TO MAKE -- THIS IS DATA FROM CONTRA COST A COUNTY. THAT'S ABOUT TWO AND A HALF TIMES THE MINIMUM WAGE OF $14 AN HOUR. SEVERAL PROFESSIONALS OUTLINED NOT MAKING ENOUGH MONEY TO COMFORTABLE TO SA FOR -- IN THE HOUSING WE TALK A LOT ABOUT LOW INCOME RESIDENT AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING. WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE IN OTHER AREAS OF THE COUNTRY MIGHT BE ABLE AFFORD HOUSING BUT HERE IN THE BAY AREA HOUSING COST ARIZE SO HIGH THAT HOUSING IS OUT OF REACH. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE THAT WORK IN THE SERVICE INDUSTRY, WAITERS TEACHERS NURSES FIREFIGHTERS PEOPLE ON FIXED INCOME THEY HAVE TO PAY A LARGE PORTION OF THEIR INCOME FOR HOUSING. AND WHAT DO WE MEAN BY AFFORDABLE HOUSING? WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HOUSING THAT'S AFFORDABLE TO LOW VERY LOW EXTREMELY LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. SO THEY AREN'T PAYING MORE THAN 30 PERCENT OF THEIR GROSS INCOME ON HOUSING COSTS. AND YOU CAN SEE HERE THESE ARE THE INCOME LIMITS FOR JURISDICTION INIZE CONTRA COST A COUNTY. INCOME LEVELS ARE SET EVERY YEAR BY THE STATE. SO HERE IN A ONE PERSON HOUSEHOLD EARNING ABOUT $76,000 CONSIDERED LOW INCOME. IN AN AFFORDABLE RENT WILL BE $19,000 A MONTH FOR HOUSING. THREE PERSON HOUSEHOLD -- CAN AFFORD 2400 A MONTH. THAT GIVES YOU A ROUGH SENSE WHEN WE SAY LOW INCOME THAT'S THE UPPER END OF THE INCOME LIMIT. HOUSEHOLD THAT'S PAY MORE THAN 30 PERCENT OF THEIR INCOME CONSIDERED COST BURDEN. THAT'S HERE HOUSEHOLDS OF OWNER OCCUPIED RENTER HOUSEHOLD THAT'S SEVERELY ONE PAYING MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THEIR INCOME AND HOUSING THAT'S SHOWN IN GOLD HERE ON THE CHART. YOU CAN SEE THE OVERPAYMENT IS GREATER FOR RENTER HOUSEHOLDS ABOUT HALF OF RENTER HOUSEHOLDS ABOUT 45 PERCENT. COMPARED TO ABOUT 29 PERCENT OF OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSEHOLDS. NOT TOO SURPRISING THE LOWER THE INCOME SO EXTREME LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 86 PERCENT OVER PAYING FOR HOUSE AND MORE THAN HALF THE EXTREMELY INCOME 56 PERCENT ARE SEVERELY SPEND MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THEIR INCOME. YOU CAN SEE HOW THAT COMPARES TO VERY LOW, LOW MODERATE AND THEN THOSE EARNING GREATER THAN THE MEDIAN ABOUT 10 PERCENT. NEXT I'M GOING TALK ABOUT THE FAIR SHARE OF THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY. SO IN CALIFORNIA HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSED A REGIONAL LEVEL PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH. IT'S CALLED A DETERMINATION IS ASSIGNED TO EVERY REGION BY THE STATE BY HCD. THE REGIONAL GOVERNMENT AND THIS REGION THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS THEIR TASK FORCES DEVELOPING A MEDOLOGY. SO THE ASSIGNED 400,000. BASED ON THE MEDOLOGY. THAT'S YOUR TOTAL HOUSING TARGET FOR THIS HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE. AND AGAIN WITH BAD FORMATTING BUT CAN YOU SEE HERE HOW YOUR TARGET FOR THE 2023 TO 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT COMPARES TO YOUR TARGET THE LAST TIME. FOR YOUR LAST HOUSING ELEMENT I SHOULD SAY THE CURRENT FAMILY YOU ARE WORKING UNDER YOUR TARGET WAS 11,000. YOU ARE ONE IN THE STATE ACTUALLY RECEIVED A LOWER HOUSING TARGET THERE TIME AROUND. A LOT OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS SAW A THREE FOLD INCREASE IN THEIR HOUSING TARGET. BASED ON OAKLEY LOCATED YOU SAW A DECREASE IN YOUR HOUSING TARGET. WE LOOK AT THE VERY LOW AND LOW INCOME CATEGORIES COMBINED WE CALL THAT THE LOWER INCOME ARENA. AND YOU'RE LOW INCOME ARENA IS ABOUT 440 HOUSING REGIONS. IT'S MOST JURISDICTIONS THE HARDEST CATEGORY TO DEMONSTRATE HOW YOU ARE GOING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT NEED. MORE DENSITY EQUALS MORE AFFORDABILITY. ONCE YOU ARE ASSIGNED THAT HOUSING UNIT TARGET IN YOUR HOUSING ELEMENT YOU HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU HAVE A APPROPRIATE ZONEITION AT DIFFER DENSITIES TO ACCOMMODATE AOR SITES ZONED FOR SINGLE FAMILY MORE MEDIAN DENSITY YOU GET TOWN HOMES AND ATTACHED HOUSING DUPLEX THAT'S MEETS YOUR MODERATE INCOME NEED AND SITES WHERE YOU CAN BUILD MULTI BUILDING. THE THRESHOLD FOR DEMONSTRATE THAT SITE CAN MEET YOUR LOWER INCOME NEED IT ALLOWS FOR 30 VOLUME UNITS PER ACRES. THAT'S DEFAULT DENSITY FOR THE STIFF OAKLEY. AND THE WAY THAT OAKLEY MEETS THE LOWER INCOME HOUSING NEED IS THROUGH THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVER LISTING OR THE AHO. THIS PLACED ON THE TOP BASE ZONING. DEVELOPMENTS INCLUDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO BE BUILT ADD UP TO 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. YOUR DEFAULT DENSITY 30 UNITS PER ACRE PART OF THIS PROJECT IS TO AMEND YOUR AHO DISTRICT TO ALLOW UP TO THAT 30 MAKE SURE THE STATE ACCEPTS YOUR AHO'S SITES YOUR LOWER INCOME. WE'RE GOING AT SITE INVOICE AND ANALYSIS AND LOOK AT THE SUMMARY OF THE HOUSING CAPACITY. WHAT WE'VE HERE AND THIS IS ATTACHMENT TO THE AGENDA A MAP AND A LIST OF YOUR CURRENT AFFORDABLE OVERLAY SITES. YOU HAVE SEVEN PARCELS REALLY GROUPED TOGETHER IN THREE SITES SHOWN HERE. YOU CAN SEE THE SIZE THE BASE ZONING AND THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT WE DON'T GET TO COUNT THESE SITES AT THEIR FULL CAPACITY. THE STATE REQUIRES US TO APPLY A LOT OF DID HE HAVE ASSUMPTION TO GET TO A REALISTIC CAPACITY OF UNITS ON THESE SITES. OUR APPROACH DISCOUNT THE CAPACITY WE HAVE TO LOOK AT DISCOUNT THE CAPACITY IF THE SITE IS NOT VACANT. IF THERE'S AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME? WHAT'S THE LIKELIHOOD THAT SITE IS GOING TO REVEL IN THE EIGHT YEARS? WE'RE FURTHER DISCOUNTING THE CAPACITY IF WE UNDERLINING ZONING ALLOW SOMETHING OTHER THAN MULTI FAMILY THAT BASE ZONING IS IF IT'S COMMERCIAL SOMEBODY CAN BUILT A STAND ALONE. IF THE STATE WANTS US TO ACCOUNT FOR THAT IN OUR HOUSING UNIT ASSUMPTIONS. YOU'RE LOWER INCOME ARENA YOUR ASSIGNED TARGET. WE HAVE ABOUT A 174 UNITS ON YOUR EXISTING AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY SITES. WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT NEEDING TO DO REZONE SOME ADDITIONAL SITES APPLY AHO TO ALLOW FOR MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO MEET THAT 440 UNIT REQUIREMENT. AND SO CITY STAFF AND MY TEAM WE IDENTIFIED 14 POTENTIAL SITES FOR CONSIDERATION. THIS WAS TO GET THE CONVERSATION GOING. OKAY. WE NEED TO FIND MORE SITES. USING DIFFERENT CRITERIA WE WERE MOSTLY LOOKING FOR SITES THAT WERE CRA CAN'T DID DECENT SIZE. WE MET WITH THE CITY COUNCIL IN MARCH. WE GOT FEEDBACK ON THEM. BASED ON THE RESPONSES FROM THE PUBLIC AND FURTHER DISCUSSIONS IN CONSIDERATIONS BETWEEN CITY STAFF AND THE CONSULTANT ABOUT WHAT WE THINK STATE WILL ACCEPT AS A GOOD SITE WHAT MAKES A GOOD SITE. WE NARROWED DOWN TO SEVEN PROPOSED SITES WHERE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY MIGHT BE APPLIED AND THOSE SITES KIND OF CIRCLED ON THE MAP. IT'S TRICKY TO SEE THESE. SITES A, B, E, FIG AND N. AND SO WITH THOSE SITES WE ARE ESTIMATING CAPACITY FOR ABOUT 427 UNITS. YOU CAN SEE ON THIS TABLE HOW WE CALCULATE THAT. WE USE THE SAME REALISTIC CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS MIGHT BE THE MAX DENSITY TO WHAT WE THINK WE CAN CREDIT ON THESE SITES. AND SO THIS IS A SUMMARY OF WITH THIS PROPOSED APPROACH WHERE THE CITY WOULD STAND IN TERMS OF MEETING THE ARENA. YOUR ARENA TARGET SHOWN ON THE TOP ROW. WE GET TO COUNT ANY UNITS ENTITLEMENTERS AND TYPE ONE PROJECTS. THERE ARE QUITE A FEW SINGLE FAMILY ENTITLEMENTED LOTS THAT ESSENTIALLY GET CREDIT CARD TOWARDS THE ABOVE MODERATE INCOME CATEGORY. WE DO A PROJECTION OF ACCESS RI DWELLING UNITS BASED ON PAST TRENDS. YOU GET CREDIT FOR A PROJECTED NUMBER OF OVER THE EIGHT YEAR PERIOD. YOU CAN SEE HERE THAT CAPACITY ON YOUR EXISTING HOA SITES. THOSE PROPOSED SITES. WE DIDN'T GET IT INTO TONIGHT THE DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT WE'LL CALL THOSE OUT SEPARATE. THEY HAVE SOME SPECIAL ZONING AROUND THOSE SITES. AND ALL OTHER SITES SORT OF VACANT SITE THAT'S DON'T HAVE THE AGE ZONED FOR HOUSING. YOU CAN SEE HOW THAT ALL ADDS UP. SUMMARY CAPACITY HIGHLIGHTED HERE IN RED. AND THEN WE'RE SHOWING A SURPLUS IN EACH CATEGORY. BEARLY MEETING THE MODERATE INCOME BUT WE HAVE A DECENT PURCHASE PLUS. WE'RE PLANNING TO GO PUBLIC THE DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT ON JUNE 27TH THAT'S OUR TARGET PUBLICATION DATE. IT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR 30 DAY REVIEW PERIOD JULY 27TH. WE'RE GOING TO MEET WITH THE CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 12TH TO GET ANY FEEDBACK ON THE TRAVESTY ELEMENT. AT THE END OF THAT PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD WE'LL SUBMIT IT TO THE STATE FOR THEIR REVIEW. THEY HAVE 9 0 DAYS TO DO THEIR FIRST REVIEW. WE EXPECT TO GET A COMMENT LETTER. WE'LL BE WORKING TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. THEY HAVE 60 DAYS SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS EVERY TIME WE SUBMIT REVISIONS. NO ONE HAS GOTTEN BY TWO ROUNDS OF REVIEW. BUT WE'RE GOING TO DO OUR BEST TO GET THAT DONE IN TWO ROUNDS. AND ONCE WE'RE THROUGH THE STATE'S REVIEW WE'LL BE BRINGING BACK TO THE PLANNING ACCOMPLICING AND THE CITY COUNCIL WITH REVISIONS. WE'LL BRING IT BACK FOR ADOPTION. PART OF OUR PROJECT IS TO AMEND THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE SITES MEET SOME OF THE CRITERIA A THAT'S REQUIRED BY STATE LAW MOSTLY THAT DENSITY OF 30 UNITS PER ACRE. SO THAT WILL BE PART OF THE PROJECT AND THEN THE ACTUAL REZONING OF THE SITES WILL BE PART OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE ANALYZED IN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS AS PART OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT AND ZONING AMENDMENT THAT WILL BE WRAPPED UP IN THAT ADOPTION. IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THESE SITES ARE REZONED PRIOR TO THAT JANUARY ADOPTION DEADLINE IF THEY'RE AREN'T CONSIDERED AVAILABLE IT GETS MORE COMPLICATED. SO IT'S POSSIBLE THAT AS WE GET CLOSER TO THE END BUY FASTENER INDICATE. WE WANT TO GET THE ZONING DONE FOR JANUARY WITH ALL THE STATE REVIEW THE HOUSING ELEMENT MIGHT LAG A LITTLE BIT. SO THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION. IT MIGHT BE OPPONENTLESSING. IF WE ARE PROJECTING 24 PER ACRE WANT TO INCREASE TO 30. HOW -- >> THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. SO AGAIN THE STATE MAKES US APPLY REALISTIC DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS WE CAN ONLY APPLY A DENSITY DEMONSTRATED TO BE BUILT AND WE CAN'T FACTOR IN STATE DENSITY BONUS WHEN WE CALCULATE THAT REAL ESTATE DENSITY. LOOKING AT YOUR PASS APPROVAL PROJECTS MOST OF YOUR AFFORDABLE YOU MAY ONLY HAVE A COUPLE EXAMPLES MOST DID USE A DENSITY BONUS DON'T GET TO FACTOR THAT IN WE ONLY GET TO COUNT YOUR CURRENT MAXIMUM YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EXAMPLESSING OF PROJECTS BEING BUILT ABOVE THAT WITHOUT USING A DENSITY BONIES. IT'S COMPLICATED. THERE'S A LOT OF COMPLICATED RULES WE HAVE TO FOLLOW HERE BUT ESSENTIALLY WE CAN'T DEMONSTRATE ABOVE 24 TO THE STATE. >> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION THE BUFFER IS PUT IN PLACE BECAUSE OF THE PROPERTY [INDECIPHERABLE] >> CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE -- >> YEAH THAT'S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION. I DIDN'T TOUCH ON THAT TONIGHT. THERE'S A CURRENT STATE LAW CALLED NO NET LOSS. YOU HAVE THESE HOUSING ELEMENTS SITES. AS YOU APPROVE PROJECTS ON THOSE SITES YOU HAVE TO ACCOUNT WHAT GETS BUILT AND INCOME LEVELS. IF YOU HAVE A SITE IN YOUR LOWER INCOME AREA. YOU GET A DRIVE THROUGH MCDONALD'S YOU GOT HIT OF HUNDRED UNITS TO YOUR INVOICE. IF YOU GET AN AFFORDABLE PROJECT ONLY 20 PERCENT YOU HAD AN 80 UNIT HIT TO YOUR INVOICE. CAN YOU SEE HOW ONE SITE PROPOSAL COULD BE A BIG HIT. SO THE BUFFER IS IT'S A 38 PERCENT BUFFER BASED ON WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING RIGHT NOW WHICH PERCENTAGE WISE IS PRETTY DECENT ANY ONE OR TWO SITES TAKEN OUT OF INVOICE COULD BE A LIT. WE'RE DOING OUR BEST TO SUCCESS YOU UP FOR SUCCESS. TALKING ABOUT INCLUDING SOME POTENTIAL HAO SITES THAT MAYBE GET ANALYZED IN THE DOCUMENT DON'T GET THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY. MIGHT USE THEM AS THEY BANK FOR THE FUTURE. SO WE'RE GOING TO TALKING ABOUT ALL OF THAT AS WE PUBLISH THE DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENTS SORT OF ALL WE'RE WORKING ON IT RIGHT NOW. >> THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S SEE. ANY FEEDBACK? THANK YOU, VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >> NOW WE MOVE ONTO FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. ANY COMMISSIONER? SEEING NONE. NO FURTHER BUSINESS. WE WILL ADJOURN THIS MEETING. THANK YOU.

Minutes of the Oakley Planning Commission held August 2, 2022 1) OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley Planning Commission Chair Shannon Shaw called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Chair Oleksii Chuiko and Commissioners Hugh Henderson, Leonard Price and Diego Verduzco were also present. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Vice Chair Chuiko led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 1.3 Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) Presentation (Abigail Fateman, Executive Director of East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy) East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy Executive Director Abigail Fateman provided a PowerPoint presentation explaining the purpose and processes of the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP), including the application/streamlined permitting process, fees, requirements, conservation strategy, species protection, land acquisition, habitat restoration, research, monitoring and management. 1.4 Presentation by Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery (“MDRR”) (Sarah Davis, MDRR) Sarah Davis and Sal Evola with Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery provided a PowerPoint presentation including a company overview, new organics law (SB 1383) and its impact on Oakley residents and businesses, and information and renderings of the Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery Park (current operations and its long-term master plan). 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 3) CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Approve Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting held June 7, 2022 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) It was moved by Commissioner Henderson and seconded by Vice Chair Chuiko to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

4) PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Golden Oak Subdivision 9580 Tentative Map (TM 02-22) and Variance (VA 01-22)-Request to Subdivide an Approximately 2-Acre Site into Eight (8) Single-Family Residential Lots and a Variance request on Meeting the Minimum Lot Requirements for Four (4) of the Eight (8) Lots (APN: 035-090- 082) (Ariana Ruiz, Planning Technician) Planning Technician Ariana Ruiz presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. Applicant Pam Young was present and available for questions. Chair Shaw opened the public hearing. Public Comments Online public comments were submitted by Elisa Vaca Rodriguez, Sue (last name not provided), Kimberly Brower, Scott Brower, Isaac Vaca Montano and Andrea Vaca- Rodriguez, and Daniel O’Leary. Elisa Vaca Rodriguez objected to the tentative map and variance due to increase in traffic, noise and agglomeration of cars, people and affect on nearby residential area, and safety of families and pets near utilizing the street for play. Sue expressed concern for children’s safety as they play in the street for lack of a playground. She suggested it be made a court rather than a through street. Kimberly Brower opposed connecting West Ruby to Fuschia/Wildcat Way due to traffic, speed, safety of children playing in the street for lack of a playground/parks in the neighborhood and vehicles using it to bypass Main Street traffic. She also requested the number of homes be limited and sidewalks for new homes to be built with lasting products. Ms. Brower also provided public comment during the meeting to address these issues. Scott Brower expressed concern regarding safety of children playing in the street with increased traffic. He requested a park/playground area and place for Oakley to congregate rather than maximizing the number of houses. Isaac Vaca Montano and Andrea Vaca-Rodriguez objected to the opening of Wildcat Way and extension to connect it with West Ruby Street due to decreased safety and tranquility in the neighborhood as well as gentrification. Ms. Vaca-Rodriguez also provided public comment during the meeting to address these issues. Daniel O’Leary expressed concern regarding increased traffic, decreased safety, and decrease of quality of life with the proposed project. He provided a rendering of an alternative layout. Mr. O’Leary also provided public comment during the meeting to address these issues.

Doug Fowler submitted a public comment card and spoke. He expressed concern with connecting the street and having increased traffic with vehicles cutting through the neighborhood to bypass traffic on Main Street. Chair Shaw closed the public hearing. Commissioner Henderson requested staff explain the City’s traffic plan to control speed and traffic. Commissioner Verduzco requested staff explain how the City will mitigate traffic for vehicles attempting to circumvent Main Street. Community Development Director Brent Smith indicated he will confer with the City Engineer regarding traffic questions and report back. Vice Chair Chuiko commented he heard concerns and would like to hear solutions. He mentioned traffic will be generated with new homes, even if not in the Downtown, and this project will create a pathway for communities to enjoy the Downtown park. Chair Shaw inquired about the street connection. Planning Manager Ken Strelo responded that there are no restrictions imposed for through traffic or time limits; it provides an additional connection for the Downtown network of streets for emergency services and access to schools and parks; however, the Planning Commission can direct staff to review and recommend conditions of approval if there is consensus to have restrictions. Chair Shaw inquired when the time would be to address the design. Mr. Strelo indicated that would be tonight and when heard by the City Council. Commissioner Verduzco inquired if speedbumps are an option. Mr. Smith mentioned it is an option that could be reviewed, but not necessarily the mitigation they would take. He indicated he will address a traffic study with the City Engineer. It was moved by Commissioner Henderson and seconded by Commissioner Verduzco to adopt the resolution and direct a detailed traffic study before the matter is heard by the City Council. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 4.2 Confianza Insurance Re-Façade Design Review (DR 02-22)-Request for Design Review Approval to Re-Façade the Existing Commercial Building (Ariana Ruiz, Planning Technician) Planning Technician Ariana Ruiz presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation.

Chair Shaw opened the public hearing. The applicant provided brief comments. There were no public comments. Chair Shaw closed the public hearing. It was moved by Vice Chair Chuiko and seconded by Commissioner Henderson to adopt the resolution as presented. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 5) REGULAR CALENDAR-None 6) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS 6.1 Reports from Staff Members Planning Manager Ken Strelo announced the deadline for comments on the 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element Update will close Friday. 6.2 Oakley Planning Commission (a) Reports from Commission Members Commissioner Price announced he will be absent from the next meeting. (b) Requests for Future Agendas Commissioner Henderson requested the City’s Traffic Engineer provide an educational update on the projects. 7) WORK SESSIONS-NONE 8) ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:41 p.m. Respectively Submitted, Libby Vreonis City Clerk

Showing the first 24,000 of 174,719 characters. The full document is at the source.

AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE OAKLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 07, 2022 6:30 PM Oakley City Council Chamber, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people. VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard. Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road; agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us. A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley Planning Commission meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000. We provide social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the city's website; and by emailing info@ci.oakley.ca.us. Please contact us at (925) 625-7000 for additional information or visit www.oakleyinfo.com. If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7013. Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that Oakley Planning Commission meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video. 1

Members of the public may address the Oakley Planning Commission on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. In compliance with State law, the Oakley Planning Commission may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a blue speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the agenda item being called. The Oakley Planning Commission Chair will call you by name to the podium to hear your comments and you have up to 3 minutes to speak. 1.OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley Planning Commission 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag 2.PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, the public is permitted to address the Planning Commission on non-agendized items. 3.CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Planning Commission with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Planning Commission who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Chair remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Chair. 3.1 Approve Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting held May 3, 2022 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Minutes 05-03-22 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) – Request for Design Review approval of an approximately 95-foot-tall public art wireless communications facility designed as a faux water tank with associated equipment; APN 033-110-005 (Ariana Ruiz, Planning Technician) Suggested Action: Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive the Staff Report, 2) Receive Questions from the City Council, 3) Open the Public Hearing, 4) Receive Comments from the Applicant, 5) Receive Public Testimony, 6) Close the Public Hearing, 7) Deliberate, 8) Summarize the Deliberation 9) Adopt the Resolution Staff Report 1. Vicinity Map 2

2. Notice of Public Hearing 3. Applicant's Plans 4. Existing LTE 700 Coverage Map 5. Proposed LTE 700 Coverage Map 6. Environmental Noise Assessment 7. Draft Resolution 5.REGULAR CALENDAR 5.1 Adopt a Resolution Appointing a Planning Commissioner to be a Representative for the Oakley Planning Commission for TRANSPLAN (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Staff Report 1. Proposed Resolution 5.2 A Resolution of the City of Oakley Planning Commission Adopting Rules of Procedure for its transaction of Business (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Staff Report 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, 2011 ed. 5.3 General Overview of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Budget (Joshua McMurray, City Manager, Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer, Tim Przybyla, Finance Director) Staff Report 1. CIP Program and Budget.pptx 2. FY 2022-2023 Project Summary 6.INFORMATIONAL REPORTS 6.1 Presentation of the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update – Informational presentation on the Housing Element Update, including key requirements, schedule, and seeking feedback on the plan (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Staff Report 1. Current AHO (Affordable Housing Overlay) Sites 7.REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 8.ADJOURN 3

Minutes of the Oakley Planning Commission held May 3, 2022 1) OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley Planning Commission City Clerk Libby Vreonis called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Planning Commissioners Oleksii Chuiko, Hugh Henderson, Leonard Price, Shannon Shaw and Diego Verduzco were present. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag City Clerk Libby Vreonis led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 1.3 Administration of Oath of Office (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) City Clerk Libby Vreonis administered the oath of office to the Planning Commissioners. 1.4 Introduction of Staff (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Planning Manager Ken Strelo introduced staff. 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 3) CONSENT CALENDAR None. 4) REGULAR CALENDAR 4.1 Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair for the Planning Commission (Derek Cole, City Attorney) It was moved by Commissioner Verduzco and seconded by Commissioner Price to select Commissioner Shaw as Chair and Commissioner Chuiko as Vice Chair. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 4

4.2 Adopt a Resolution Approving Action Minutes for Planning Commission Meetings (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) It was moved by Commissioner Henderson and seconded by Vice Chair Chuiko to adopt a resolution approving action minutes for Planning Commission meetings. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 5) PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 6) INFORMATIONAL REPORTS 6.1 Ralph M. Brown Act Training (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Assistant City Attorney Elizabeth Fratarcangeli provided Brown Act Training with a PowerPoint presentation. 6.2 Planning Commission Ordinance Overview (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Assistant City Attorney Elizabeth Fratarcangeli reviewed highlights of the Planning Commission ordinance. 6.3 General Plan Overview (Ken Strelo, Planning Manager) Planning Manager Ken Strelo provided a General Plan overview with a PowerPoint presentation. 7) REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS None. 8) ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:17 p.m. Respectively Submitted, Libby Vreonis City Clerk 5

STAFF REPORT Approved and Forwarded to the City DATE: June 7, 2022 TO: Joshua McMurray, City Manager FROM: Ariana Ruiz, Planning Technician SUBJECT: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) – Request for Design Review approval of an approximately 95-foot-tall public art wireless communications facility designed as a faux water tank with associated equipment; APN 033-110-005. Summary This is a public hearing on an application by Complete Wireless Consulting (“Applicant”) requesting Design Review (DR 09-21) approval of an approximately 95-foot-tall public art wireless communications facility (cellular tower) designed as a faux water tank with twelve (12) panel antennas and associated tower equipment on an approximately 0.75- acre site. The structure and associated equipment will be within a 60-foot by 40-foot area. The ground equipment to include a walk-in cabinet and stand-by 30kw generator with a 190-gallon fuel tank (“Project”). The project site is located at the property address 30 Delta Road. The site is zoned C (General Commercial) District. APN: 033-110-005. Background General Plan and Zoning  The General Plan Land Use Designation for the project site is Commercial (CO), as depicted in the Oakley General Plan Figure 2-2 (Land Use Diagram).  The project site is zoned C (General Commercial) District. Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The approximately 0.75-acre project site is located on the north side of Delta Road and east of Main Street. The parcel is marginally developed with an existing building and propane service on-site. The proposed tower will be located within a 60-foot by 40-foot leased area within the parcel. The leased area is located approximately 11’ from the north property line and approximately 32’ from the west property line. Figure 1 shows the exact placement of the leased area. 6

Subject: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) Date: June 7, 2022 Page 2 of 7 Properties located to the north, west, and east are zoned C (General Commercial) District. These parcels contain existing single-family residences and are considered legal non-conforming parcels. To the south of the project site, following Delta Road, there are two parcels located within unincorporated Contra Costa County. These parcels are located within Single-Family Residential Districts. Figure 2 (below) shows an aerial view of the site from the Contra Costa County GIS website (https://ccmap.cccounty.us). Figure 2 - Project Site Figure 1 - Leased Area 7

Subject: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) Date: June 7, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Project Description and Background Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance Per Oakley Municipal Code (“OMC”) section 9.1.1202 Wireless Communications Facilities, Public Art Facilities are subject to Design Review approval by the Planning Commission. The proposed faux water tower tank falls within the definition of a “Public Art Facility”. Examples of Public Art Facilities as listed within the OMC include clock towers, windmills, trees, or historical monuments. A water tank is consistent with these types of structures. Wireless communications facilities are also required to comply with the development standards as listed within this section. Co-Location to Existing Towers Section 9.1.1202 Wireless Communications Facilities of the OMC encourages co- location of wireless communications facilities to minimize overall visual impact of the facilities. Staff requested the applicant co-locate with an existing tower. There is an existing tower located approximately 0.2 miles from the project site at the property address 5740 Main Street. The Applicant attempted to contact the property owner of this tower but was unsuccessful. Staff also worked with the Applicant to contact the property owner and was unsuccessful. Staff determined the Applicant had exhausted all feasible attempts to contact the property owner and proceeded with analyzing the application, as proposed. Need for Wireless Communication Facility Complete Wireless Consulting was employed by AT&T to help provide greater coverage within the Oakley, unincorporated Contra Costa County, and Brentwood area. A study was completed that shows AT&T’s capacity and coverage are insufficient in providing their customers with quality signal strength within these areas. The study further shows the areas suffer from poor wireless coverage and low-capacity levels, which proves ineffective service. Attachment 4 shows there is a significant gap in coverage for AT&T customers. Installation of this site will allow AT&T customers to have greater and reliable access to wireless services the areas shown within the coverage area map as seen within Attachment 5. Proposed Water Tower and Mechanical Equipment The Wireless Communication Facility is proposed to be installed at a total height of 95- feet. The proposed antennas will be constructed within the faux water tank, which is approximately 27’ in height by 23’ in width. To help resemble a real tank, the tank will be elevated and placed on top of the supporting structure at a height of 67’. As proposed, the water tank will stand on four legs slightly angled outward to resemble the legs of a water tank. The water tank is proposed to be constructed of curved fiber glass and will be painted to resemble a wooden water tank. Figure’s 3 and 4 below show the existing site and the site with the proposed water tank as a photo simulation. 8

Subject: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) Date: June 7, 2022 Page 4 of 7 The wireless communications facility requires the installation of a walk-in cabinet, and a stand-by 30kw generator with a 190-gallon fuel tank. The equipment is proposed to be located entirely within the leased area. This equipment shall be screened by a decorative wall. Figure 3 – Photo Simulation of Existing Site Figure 4 - Photo Simulation of Proposed Water Tower 9

Subject: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) Date: June 7, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Environmental Review The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 – Infill Development Projects). Analysis Section 9.1.1202 Wireless Communication Facilities Design Review applications for Wireless Communications Facilities are governed by section 9.1.1202 of the OMC. A Design Review application may be granted when all provision listed within this section have been met. The drafted resolution (Attachment 4) discusses the proposed findings in detail. In addition to the development standards of this section, Freestanding Wireless Communications Facilities must comply with the following standards: 1. Freestanding wireless communication towers shall be located and designed to minimize visual impacts. When appropriate, monopoles in areas where adverse visual impacts cannot be avoided (as in some commercial areas), shall be camouflaged, disguised and/or blended into the surrounding environment, or disguised as public art, flag poles, telephone poles, light standards, or other visual forms to avoid an adverse visual impact. 2. The smallest available and least visible antennas that provide the coverage objective shall be mounted on towers. The proposed plans were also analyzed for consistency with the applicable development regulations in the Oakley Municipal Code and adopted Commercial Design Guidelines (“Guidelines”) and are consistent with the findings as mentioned above. Although the faux water tower is proposed at a height of 95’, the applicant has worked to revise the plans to resemble a functioning water tower. As the tower is proposed at the entrance to the City of Oakley, the applicant has incorporated the City name and logo on the tower. This helps to create a prominent entryway into the City of Oakley as encouraged within the General Plan. Per OMC section 9.1.1202 (d.)(i.)(8), all freestanding wireless communication towers shall be designed at the minimum functional height required for the coverage area. The support statement provided by the applicant indicates the minimum height requirement in order to provide coverage for their customers is approximately 95’ in height. Fencing Originally, the Applicant had proposed to install a 6’ tall chain link fence with barbed wire to enclose the associated equipment. The applicant has agreed to install a decorative CMU wall with a decorative trim cap that shall screen the ground-floor equipment in order 10

Subject: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) Date: June 7, 2022 Page 6 of 7 to better comply with the development and design standards of Oakley’s Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines. A condition has been added to ensure a fence is installed in compliance with the development and design standards. Landscaping Development regulations for projects require landscape is installed in compliance with Oakley’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and Guidelines. The Applicant has not proposed landscaping due to the severity of the drought California has experienced for the past three years. Additionally, since this facility is proposed to be unmanned and requires no on-site personnel. Only proposed with routine maintenance; maintenance for the landscaping cannot be guaranteed to be kept-up. Environmental Noise Assessment An environmental noise assessment was completed to evaluate the project impacts and ensure the proposed project complies with the regulations, plans, and policies set forth within the Oakley General Plan. The noise assessment was evaluated with the Noise Level Standards for New Projects as listed within the General Plan. The maximum dBA as listed within this section is 55 during the day and a maximum of 45 during nighttime. The noise monitoring survey was dated June 30, 202 to analyze the noise levels of the proposed equipment and generator. Research conducted categorizes the noise levels by evaluating long-term noise and short-term noise. Although these noise levels ranged between 68 and 62 dBA, the analysis concluded with the installation of a solid wall will ultimately reduce the decibel levels. The study further states a combination of an acoustic enclosure for the project and generator and construction of a solid noise barrier along the perimeter of the lease area would reduce the decibel levels. With the installation of a solid wall, the project would comply with the thresholds set forth within the Oakley General Plan. General Plan Analysis This development helps to promote goals and policies outlined within Oakley’s General Plan for Wireless Communication Facilities. Goals as listed within the Land Use Element request these facilities are created with design excellence in mind. The policies reflected within the General Plan’s Goal 2.9 Project Design / Design Excellence request future development projects reinforce a sense of place and display design excellence. The proposed architectural plans help achieve this goal by disguising the facility as a water tower; helping to preserve Oakley’s small town and agrarian character. Policy 2.9.6 requires the visual impact of wireless telecommunication facilities to be minimized by designing them as an integral architectural feature of a site or structure. The faux water-tower has been designed to include water conduits to run the electrical conduits. This helps to disguise the equipment related to the facility and promotes the design making it appear as a functional water tower. 11

Subject: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) Date: June 7, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Consistency with the Oakley Strategic Plan 27+ This item is consistent with the Strategic Plan 27+ Community and Economic Growth Goal and Strategic and Thoughtful Growth Sub-Goal. The City of Oakley strives to continue community and economic development through thoughtful growth. Each project must be evaluated by strategically planning and aligning residential, commercial, and industrial growth. An objective as listed within this strategic plan includes meeting the new service demands of local residents. As the City expands, this creates a need for additional services for the residents. Installation of this tower as proposed will provide a greater coverage area for residents while also reinforcing the small-town character of Oakley. Fiscal Impact The approval of this Design Review application will not impact the General Fund. This is a developer-funded account. All Staff time and City of Oakley generated materials related to the processing of this application, including reproduction of physical copies and postage for public hearing notices, are charged to the account. Findings Draft findings for the Design Review can be found in the proposed resolution. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution approving the “Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-20)”, as conditioned. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Notice of Public Hearing 3. Applicant’s Plans 4. Existing LTE 700 Coverage Area 5. Proposed LTE 700 Coverage Area 6. Environmental Noise Assessment 7. Draft Resolution 12

Vicinity Map Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road (DR 09-21) APN: 033-110-005 13

City of Oakley 3231 Main Street Oakley, CA 94561 www.oakleyinfo.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that on June 7, 2022, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Planning Commission of the City of Oakley will hold a Public Hearing at the Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for the purposes of considering an application for a Design Review as described below: Project Name: Wireless Communication Facility at 30 Delta Road Project Location: 30 Delta Road, Oakley, CA 94561 Applicant: Complete Wireless Consulting, 2009 V Street, Sacramento, CA 95818 Request: Application by Complete Wireless Consulting (“Applicant”) requesting approval of a Design Review application to approve an approximately 95-foot-tall public art wireless communications facility (cellular tower) designed as a faux water tank with twelve (12) panel antennas and associated tower equipment on an approximately 0.75-acre site. The structure and associated equipment will be within a 60-foot by 40-foot area. The ground equipment to include a walk-in cabinet and stand-by 30kw generator with a 190-gallon fuel tank (“Project”). The project site is located at the property address 30 Delta Road. The site is zoned C (General Commercial) District. (APN: 035-110-005). How to Review: The Staff Report and its attachments will be available for public review, on or before June 2, 2022 at City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 or online at www.ci.oakley.ca.us/agendas-minutes-videos-archive/ by navigating to the June 7, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda and clicking the project title link. (Note: City Hall is closed on the 1st and 3rd Fridays of each month). Interested persons are invited to submit written comments prior to and may testify at the public hearing. Written comments may be submitted to Ariana Ruiz, Planning Technician at the City of Oakley, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 or by email to ruiz@ci.oakley.ca.us. NOTICE IS ALSO GIVEN pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b) that, if this matter is subsequently challenged in Court by you or others, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else has raised at a Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Oakley City Clerk at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. 14

SHEET INDEXPROJECT INFORMATION APPROVALS APPROVED BY: INITIALS: DATE: VENDOR: LEASING / LANDLORD: R.F.: ZONING: CONSTRUCTION: POWER / TELCO: PG&E: CODE COMPLIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT TEAM GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL SIZE AT 24" x 36". CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOBSITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Budget documentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Jun 7, 2022 - 06:29 PM — Minutes
  • Jun 7, 2022 - 06:29 PM

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: 9b9ec60a24ef9ee4a922b9853c0ea524. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record