Additional Documents

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2025, AT 7:00 PM ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Additional Documents to the August 20, 2025 City Council Meetings. The attached documents include submitted written public comments and amendments to the agenda. Submit by no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the City Council meeting. Correspondence received after this time will be distributed the following business day. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS TO THE AUGUST 20, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS General Public Comment_ Yvonne LaRose General Public Comment_ Yvonne LaRose (2) General Public Comment_ Barbara Cocks General Public Comment_Kristen Pumphrey General Public Comment_Philipp Knopf Public Comment_Lawrence Abelson_Item No. 1 Public Comment_David Watkins_Item No. 29 Public Comment_Yvonne LaRose_Item No. 29 Public Comment_KC_Item No. 29 1

From: Yvonne LaRose To: City Council Public Comment Subject: General Public Comment: Know Your Rights Resources and Advice Date: Sunday, August 17, 2025 7:41:43 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Because of the daily and escalating ICE raids and activities, it has become imperative that all become aware of their rights and safety protocols if you (or those you know) become subject to ICE activities. To that extent, I have created a post on Instagram that outlines steps to take. There are links to "Know Your Rights" from both California Sen. Perez and Rep. Fong, in addition to a webinar conducted by Families First. In addition to describing how to handle de- escalation, this also describes when you may calmly walk away from the confrontation situation. California is one of six states where cooperation with ICE and National Guard immigration efforts is prohibited. According to a June 25, 2025 USA Today article, Under the California Values Act – the state's sanctuary law – state and local police are prohibited from investigating, detaining, or deporting its residents for purposes of immigration enforcement, according to CalMatters. The law does not prevent the federal government from deporting undocumented residents living in California, but rather limits local and state police cooperation with federal immigration officers. Although this statement is reliable, it is still my stance and continuing request that South Pasadena declare itself a sanctuary city for the sake of immigration actions as well as protection of women's private health choices. By doing so, the City will underscore its Families First: De-escalation Call (8.22) 2

recognition of the human rights for all who are within our boundaries. Yvonne LaRose, CAC Organization Development Consultant: Diversity/Title VII, Harassment, Ethics Linkedin 3

From: Yvonne LaRose To: Finance Commission Public Comment; City Council Public Comment Subject: Affordable Housing Embedded in the BBB Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 3:46:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. With the current wranglings about our local budget and concerns about achieving 'affordable housing' in South Pasadena, an article from yesterday's Sacramento "The Observer" shares some insights into #47's hidden housing tax credits that are worth consideration. . Hidden in Trump’s spending package: A surprise boost to California’s affordable housing by CALMATTERS NETWORK August 12, 2025. Viva Yvonne LaRose, CAC Organization Development Consultant: Diversity/Title VII, Harassment, Ethics Linkedin Trump's spending bill boosts affordable housing funding - The Sacramento... CALmatters Network California may see a surge in affordable housing construction as federal funding increases, potentially doubling... 4

From: Barbara Cocks To: City Council Public Comment Subject: Comment -- SP City council meeting August 20, 2025 Date: Saturday, August 16, 2025 1:17:52 PM Attachments: Screenshot 2023-10-12 at 3.52.19 PM.png FullSizeRender.MOV CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Potential SPAM Detected This message may contain malicious content! Exercise caution with attachments and links. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We recently marked the 3rd anniversary of the inexcusable death and serious injury of our neighbors— the Nguyens. A number of neighbors were so appalled by this senseless loss we began to advocate for change. Since forming Marengo Matters following the death of our neighbor Tam Nguyen and serious injury to several of his family members, we have connected with South Pasadena and Alhambra residents and various city, county and State representatives in an effort to find solutions to the growing, deadly traffic issues in our neighborhoods. We have done extensive research on traffic quieting efforts and the traffic issues plaguing communities nationwide. We have also connected with a number of community organizations focused on quality of life issues in the greater San Gabriel Valley in hopes of working together on these issues. Members of Marengo Matters have attended South Pasadena Council Meetings, Transportation Committee meetings, met with representatives (Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Managers, Directors of Public Works, etc.) from the cities of South Pasadena and Alhambra, and participated in and contributed to, the study and preliminary recommendations made by the Toole Design Group as part of the Fremont Avenue, Fair Oaks Avenue and Huntington Drive Transportation Project. We have created, printed and distributed multiple newsletters, developed and published an open letter to the residents of South Pasadena in the South Pasadena Review, produced curb side signs that are now displayed throughout South Pasadena and portions of Alhambra addressing the reckless driving, speeding and total lack of regard for the people living in our neighborhoods on a daily basis. And we have hosted information booths during two METRO hosted, citywide events to share information about the devastation to our neighborhood and quality of life at the hands of others. Everyone has remained committed and hopeful that we will ultimately prevail because although those in charge come and go, the majority of the neighbors have lived in the area for decades and are not willing to settle for anything less than the safe streets they deserve and that their tax dollars fund. All of our collective efforts were motivated by the death of our neighbor — yet we had not had any direct contact with the Nguyen family since his untimely death UNTIL YESTERDAY. The family reached out to us on the 3rd anniversary of their family’s loss and asked to meet with a representative from Marengo Matters. I sat with a representative of the Nguyen family on a recent Sunday afternoon at the same time of day as the accident as they shared their pain and inability to understand how this could have happened on a sunny day in a clearly marked crosswalk with a 4 WAY STOP. I was overwhelmed by the immense loss they suffered and continue to endure everyday. The criminal and civic proceedings that have followed have been very long and drawn out and less than satisfying resulting 5

in one year of probation for the driver and her driver’s license status is unclear— there is no closure nor will there be for this family until the conditions that led to this are remedied. They drive by the corner where this horrible incident occurred every single day… and during our conversation they repeatedly asked why nothing has been done to slow the traffic and enforce the laws in place that require people to STOP. I found myself trying to share everything we have been doing since 2022 and at the end of our conversation I felt like we had done nothing. This is just unacceptable. The family deserves more. The residents in South Pasadena and Alhambra need to be able to safely enter and exit their driveways, walk their pets, have a safe environment for their kids to walk to school, and play and ride their bikes and those trying to access Alhambra Park need to be able to do so safely. We need more traffic calming measures installed on Marengo including — ~ SPEED CUSHIONS (designed NOT to interfere with Emergency Vehicles) ~ Reduction in the posted SPEED LIMIT to 20MPH from the current 25MPH ~ Enhanced STOP SIGNS (larger or with reflectors) ~ Crosswalks repainted with reflective paint I invite the CURRENT members of the South Pasadena City Council, the current Fire Chief and other city representatives to make an IN PERSON assessment of the issue by coming to our street to experience FIRST HAND what we deal with EVERY SINGLE DAY. I am attaching a video taken on Thursday August 14th it is a prime example of the DANGER we face daily. Barbara Cocks Marengo Matters 2062 Marengo Avenue 6

South Pasadena, CA 91030 626 826-0349 7

From: Kristen Pumphrey To: City Council Public Comment Subject: Public Comment - Lowering the Speed Limit - Twenty is Plenty Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 11:33:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members, I’m writing in support of lowering speed limits in South Pasadena. Assembly Bill 43 gives our city the authority to reduce limits by 5 mph on streets with heavy pedestrian and cyclist use. This is a free, immediate way to make our streets safer, without waiting for infrastructure changes. Speeding is a leading contributor to traffic fatalities. Lower speeds result in less lethal crashes. It’s truly that simple. As a city, it's your responsibility to keep us safe. South Pasadena is only 2x2 miles. There’s no need for speeding here, yet our major and minor streets - Mission, Fair Oaks, Monterey, Hawthorne, Pasadena - are often used as cut-throughs. I walk and cycle daily, and help lead a weekly Bike Bus for Arroyo Vista students. Almost every week, I have a close call with a driver speeding through an intersection, particularly at Pasadena & Mission, where I’ve previously requested a 3-way stop to Council Member Ferguson. This is not the kind of city we want to build. “Twenty is Plenty” reflects a safer, people- centered vision for our community. Cities like West Hollywood have already implemented it. South Pasadena should too. Thank you for your consideration. Kristen Pumphrey El Centro St 8

From: Philipp Knopf To: City Council Public Comment Subject: Public comment - Speed Limits Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 11:58:06 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members, I’m writing in support of lowering speed limits in South Pasadena. Assembly Bill 43 gives our city the authority to reduce limits by 5 mph on streets with heavy pedestrian and cyclist use. This is a free, immediate way to make our streets safer, without waiting for infrastructure changes. Speeding is a leading contributor to traffic fatalities. Lower speeds result in less lethal crashes. It’s truly that simple. As a city, it's your responsibility to keep us safe. Mission, Fair Oaks, Monterey, Hawthorne, Pasadena - are often used as cut-throughs. I walk and cycle daily, and help lead a weekly Bike Bus for Arroyo Vista students. Almost every week, I have a close call with a driver speeding through an intersection, particularly at Indiana and Monterey where cars constantly run red lights. There have been plenty of minor and major accidents on this intersection. It is not a very safe place to cross for anyone, especially young children. The buttons for the pedestrian lights are placed extra inconveniently too. I live on Indiana Ave, south of Monterey and cars are constantly speeding through. This is not the kind of city we want to build. “Twenty is Plenty” reflects a safer, people- centered vision for our community. Cities like West Hollywood have already implemented it. South Pasadena should too. Thank you for your consideration. Kindly, Philipp Knopf 9

From: Lawrence Abelson To: City Council Public Comment Cc: Michael Vartanians Subject: City Council - 8/20/25 - Study Session - Agenda item 1 - Tree Ordinance Date: Monday, August 18, 2025 7:07:32 AM Attachments: IMG_3604.jpg IMG_3606.jpg IMG_3670.jpg 071625 CC Agenda Item 22 Tree Ordinance.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of South Pasadena. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Honorable Mayor Braun and Members of the City Council, Below please find the comments that I previously submitted in connection with your consideration of proposed changes to the City's tree ordinance, originally slated for your 7/16/25 meeting and then postponed to your meeting this Wednesday, 8/20/25. I will not be able to attend, as I am hosting an orientation session for referees for the AYSO Area 1C Upper Division program starting this Sunday, 8/24/25. The focus of my concern is the limited reach of the notice provided in connection with proposed tree removal, as currently proposed. It would also be helpful to have a system which the public could access to easily look up the status of a tree removal application. Right now, those interested (other than the applicant) are completely in the dark. If you have any questions or would like to discuss, please feel free to contact me. Thanks very much, Larry Abelson ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Lawrence Abelson Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:17 PM Subject: City Council - 7/16/25 - Regular Meeting Agenda #22 - Tree Ordinance To: <ccpubliccomment@southpasadenaca.gov> Cc: Michael Vartanians <mvartanians@southpasadenaca.gov> Honorable Mayor Braun and Members of the City Council, I am very concerned by the extremely small radius used to determine who is notified of a proposed tree removal when that notice is required. The new draft ordinance proposes to continue the existing radius of just 100 feet from the property line without change. This is woefully insufficient, providing notice to at best just 2-3 of homes on any side. Depending on property size, configuration and location, the number of homes notified could even be less. For a City of Trees, this is not nearly enough. Trees generally, but particularly those that are protected, taller, majestic, or otherwise significant (either individually or collectively) have an 10

impact on a neighborhood and community that extends well beyond a couple of homes on either side of a particular property. Those impacted deserve to be notified and have an opportunity to comment. As an example, there is a home in our neighborhood where the absentee landlord wishing to build an ADU proposed to remove15 trees, including three significant 80-100 foot tall pines with diameters between 2 and 4 feet and a number of mature oaks and natives, all of which are viewed and enjoyed by residents well beyond 100 feet away. See attached pictures. Even though the property is just one block away, I found out about it only through a neighbor, without any notice from the applicant or the City. This is unacceptable and unlike the notice required for projects before other bodies such as the Planning Commission, where a radius of 300 or 500 feet (depending on the application) is required. Notably, a number of other cities, such as Long Beach and Alhambra, have a 300-foot radius requirement. In Beverly Hills, from what I understand, depending on the location and level of review required, the notice requirement can extend to 500 and 1,000 feet. We should require a minimum radius of 300 feet from each property line, along with a posted notice visible from the street. I do not object to the effort to streamline the process, including removing a number of the instances where notice is currently required but should not be necessary. Where notice will now be required, however, it should be meaningful. I will note that I raised my concern about the notice radius at the 6/11/25 meeting of the Public Works Infrastructure Commission (which I currently chair). I asked if there was a statutory or other justification for the short radius, but none was provided. (See the video of our meeting [https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=hDOPACakqa4&list=PL6FKtOMLurbZ5SBjuidRgI0sGBLQNYW3G&index=2], minutes 39 to 41.) Your staff report for this item (also attached) mentions generally that our commission agreed with NREC's feedback to staff and the proposed changes. I would add that each commissioner had questions and comments about the new ordinance and that this item took up over 45 minutes of our meeting. (Video, minutes 1:53 to 48:30.). At the end, when I asked if a motion was needed, staff advised that it was not and that our comments would be summarized and shared with you. (Video, minute 48:15.) I don't see them in the report. I have shared the link to the video of our meeting, because the minutes of that meeting contain no report of the substance of our discussion (apparently because the City's new approach is to only include a description of actions taken by motion, which we were advised at the time was not necessary). Please recommend that the radius for notice, when required for tree removal, be increased to at least 300 feet and that a notice of the proposed removal be posted on the property so that it is visible from the street. Only in this way can those affected have meaningful notice and the opportunity to weigh in. Otherwise, when folks do find out at the eleventh hour, much less during removal, we could all be in for chaotic consequences. Thank you, Larry Abelson 11

City Council Agenda Report ITEM NO. 22 DATE: July 16, 2025 FROM: Todd Hileman, City Manager PREPARED BY: Michael Vartanians, Acting Public Works Co-Director Danielle Garcia, Management Analyst SUBJECT: REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S TREE ORDINANCE IN CHAPTER 34 OF THE SOUTH PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE Recommendation It is recommended that City Council review and provide feedback on recommended revisions to the South Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 34 Trees and Shrubs (Tree Ordinance) and direct staff to draft an updated tree ordinance to be presented to City Council at a future meeting. Executive Summary Staff have identified several challenges in administering South Pasadena’s current Tree Ordinance, including ambiguous definitions, unclear removal criteria, and a permitting process that lacks efficiency and transparency. Based on a review of neighboring cities' practices, commission feedback, and recent application trends, staff recommend the following ordinance revisions to streamline permitting, clarify tree protections, and strengthen enforcement in support of the City’s urban forest sustainability goals. 1. Align ordinance with City’s existing Water-Efficient Landscape Ordinance and State standards. 2. Include language on optimal seasonal timing for trimming “protected tree” species. 3. Clearly distinguish heritage trees from the “protected tree” category. 4. Create a category of “protected” trees that align to the species of trees the City has adopted by resolution 7360 to be considered native. Revise tree trimming & removal permits to only be required for this category of “protected” trees. 5. Limit tree removal/trimming notification letters to cases when the Director denies an application and an appeal is filed or for instances when the removal/trimming is associated with land development. 6. Integrate additional removal criteria to address fire risk and insurance factors. 7. Eliminate removal criteria related to the unreasonable hardship to property owner by denial of the permit (34.11(a)(2)). 8. Eliminate removal criteria related to the replacement trees being of greater value or 225912

benefit (34.11(a)(4)). 9. Revise the number of required replacement trees for all tree removal applications. Allow flexibility in replacement size and require replacement trees to be “protected” species only. 10. Revise the ordinance to ensure that fees related to appeals for tree related permits are incurred by the appellant. 11. Revise ordinance to eliminate subjective criteria in violation assessments, enabling staff to apply enforcement consistently and fairly. 12. Amend the ordinance to exempt the City and its contractors from the requirement to obtain tree removal or trimming permits. In addition to the ordinance revisions recommended above, t he following items will support the tree ordinance update and provide clearer guidance to residents as they navigate the revised process. Create guideline/check list to streamline permitting criteria for trimming and removal, providing clear guidelines early in the process Utilize existing City communication channels to promote tree care best practices Develop a comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan Background Tree City USA South Pasadena has been a Tree City USA community for over 25 years, reflecting its long- standing commitment to preserving the urban forest. This designation, awarded by the Arbor Day Foundation, recognizes the City’s efforts in maintaining a tree care ordinance, supporting community forestry through policy and funding, and promoting public engagement via Arbor Day observances. These actions align with the City’s broader environmental goals as outlined in its Climate Action and Green Action Plans. Current Policies/Procedures The City of South Pasadena has a long-standing commitment to protecting its urban forest, guided by the Tree Ordinance in the City's municipal code (Attachment 1). The ordinance outlines procedures for maintaining, removing, and replacing public and private trees to ensure a healthy, sustainable tree canopy. In the current Tree Ordinance, trees are classified into categories— Protected Trees (e.g., mature native species, mature significant), Street Trees (located on city ROW & property), and Heritage Trees (noted for size, age, and cultural value)—each with specific permitting 226013

and maintenance requirements. A permit is required for the removal of any protected, heritage, or street tree, as well as for major pruning (trimming of more than 10% of the canopy or root system). Currently, removal applications are evaluated based on criteria such as safety risks, structural interference, arborist assessment, or if replacement would offer greater environmental value. If applications for tree removal are approved, replacement planting is required, with the number of replacement trees based on the size of the tree removed and/or if the application is associated with development. Deposit fees are collected and when replanting on-site is not feasible are forfeited by the applicant, funds are used to support city sponsored tree planting efforts. Enforcement is handled by the Public Works Department, with Code Enforcement addressing unauthorized removals. The Natural Resources & Environmental Commission (NREC) reviews complex or appealed cases and provides recommendations to City Council or the Public Works Director. The Planning Review Authority reviews all applications associated with development projects – taking into consideration the recommendations of Public Works Director and/or NREC. Recently, staff initiated and Council approved a resolution to amend the City’s Tree Ordinance, with the goal of updating criteria related to dead or hazardous trees and better aligning the ordinance with community needs and climate resiliency efforts (Attachment 2). The changes included the following: Section 34.11 (criteria for approving tree removal permit applications) was amended to add a new provision for non-development tree removal permits issued on or after April 1, 2025. Under this provision, the Director of Public Works may approve tree removals without public notice or a replacement plan if a certified arborist or the Director determines that the tree is dead, dying, or poses an imminent threat. In such cases, only one replacement tree is required, with the type and size determined at the Director’s discretion. Section 34.18 was added to the ordinance introducing administrative regulations. This section authorizes the City Manager to adopt administrative procedures, regulations, and guidelines to support the enforcement and implementation of Chapter 34 – Trees & Shrubs. All adopted materials will be made publicly available at City Hall or on the City’s website. Analysis Current Challenges While the City of South Pasadena’s current Tree Ordinance has provided a valuable foundation for safeguarding the community’s urban forest, staff has identified several 226114

challenges in its day-to-day administration and inability to adapt to the changing needs of its community. The ordinance’s definitions and classifications—such as what qualifies as a “protected,” “significant,” or “heritage” tree—can be ambiguous, leading to confusion among applicants and inconsistencies in enforcement. Similarly, the criteria for approval of applications proposing to remove trees is inconsistent with the modern challenges residents are facing, including establishing fire-ready landscapes or responding to insurance claims regarding the potential structural damage a tree poses. Staff see potential to strengthen the permitting process by making it more transparent, accessible, and efficient through clearer review criteria, defined timelines, and improved user navigation. Current replacement requirements do not always account for space limitations or species suitability, resulting in difficulties with implementation on constrained sites. Enforcement tools are limited, making it difficult to deter unauthorized removals or to ensure meaningful restitution when violations occur. Collectively, these challenges have highlighted the need for a comprehensive ordinance update that improves clarity, strengthens protections, and better aligns with both community values and contemporary environmental standards. Ordinance Comparisons Staff has conducted a comprehensive review of South Pasadena’s existing Tree Ordinance in comparison with those of regional peer cities including Glendale, Arcadia, Sierra Madre, Claremont, La Canada, San Marino and Alhambra. The analysis aimed to address gaps and areas for improvement in the City’s current code. Staff identified the following focus areas within the research: Maintenance Responsibility, Development and Land Use, Trimming and Pruning Criteria, Removal Criteria, Permitting Process and Compliance and Enforcement. Maintenance responsibilities were found to be more explicitly defined in other cities – for example clearly outlining maintenance duties for private and public trees and providing education and guidelines to support resident compliance. Similar to South Pasadena’s existing ordinance language pertaining to development & land use, peer cities require the submittal of tree surveys, certified arborist reports, and tree protection plans when tree removal or trimming is proposed in connection with land development activities. Permitting requirements for tree trimming vary across jurisdictions. In certain cities, permits are limited to the trimming of designated native or protected species, while in others, no permit is required if the work is conducted by a certified arborist. Some municipalities restrict their permitting authority solely to trees located within the public right-of-way. To enhance clarity, reduce enforcement challenges, and promote consistent application of regulations, staff recommends the establishment of well-defined thresholds for when a trimming permit is required. These thresholds should be aligned with best practices and industry standards as outlined by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Consistent with South Pasadena’s current removal criteria, all neighboring cities require 226215

permits for tree removals and prioritize the protection of specific tree categories—most commonly native species, heritage trees, or mature street trees. Several jurisdictions streamline their permitting processes by exempting lower-impact species, such as fruit trees or palms, while others define protected trees using objective criteria such as trunk diameter or height. Notably, many cities emphasize California native species within their protected tree lists, and in several cases, these same species are required for use in mandatory tree replacements, reinforcing long-term canopy and habitat goals. These shared regional practices reflect a broader commitment to urban forest preservation and present an opportunity for South Pasadena to enhance its ordinance by more explicitly prioritizing native species and aligning with current ecological standards. In contrast, permitting in many neighboring cities have streamlined their tree regulations by focusing enforcement on protected species, establishing clear thresholds for when permits are required, and incorporating professional oversight into the review process. Routine maintenance activities are frequently exempt from permitting requirements, thereby reducing the administrative burden on property owners while still safeguarding significant tree resources. Notably, cities such as Sierra Madre and Glendale are actively re-evaluating their ordinances to address emerging challenges related to aging tree canopies and increasing development pressures. Enforcement & compliance practices vary, but many cities effectively manage limited staff resources by focusing on protected trees, applying clear criteria, and requiring professional oversight. This targeted approach reduces administrative burden while preserving urban canopy health. Most cities prioritize enforcement on native or otherwise protected trees, allowing staff to focus on the most impactful cases. Even with strong codes, enforcement can be resource-intensive, requiring a balanced strategy that includes education, outreach, and targeted compliance efforts. Urban forest management emerged as a common priority across jurisdictions, either codified directly within municipal ordinances or referenced through supplemental guidelines. Emphasizing a balanced approach—moving beyond strict preservation measures to incorporate long-term canopy goals while accommodating the practical needs of development, utility maintenance, and public safety. Additionally, a commonly cited best practice includes requiring that trimming or removal of protected trees be conducted by certified arborists or licensed contractors from a city- approved list – as seen in the City of La Canada. This standard helps ensure that tree work is performed safely, to industry best practices, and with proper insurance coverage—supporting both public safety and long-term urban forest health. Proposed Recommendations 226316

Based on a review of neighboring cities' practices, commission feedback, and recent application trends, staff recommend the following ordinance revisions to streamline permitting, clarify tree protections, and strengthen enforcement in support of the City’s urban forest sustainability goals. 1. Align ordinance with City’s existing Water-Efficient Landscape Ordinance and State standards —for example, by promoting sustainable site design and water conservation staff can support climate goals and provide consistency for applicants. 2. Include language on optimal seasonal timing for trimming “protected tree” species, aiming to promote healthy growth and minimize environmental impact. For example, specifying appropriate oak tree trimming during the dry summer months to reduce the risk of disease, aligning with local climate conditions and best practices. 3. Clearly distinguish heritage trees from the “protected tree” category , ensuring consistent tailored protections and management standards. 4. Create a category of “protected” trees that align to the species of trees the City has adopted by Resolution 7360 (Attachment 3) to be considered native. Revise tree trimming & removal permits to only be required for this category of “protected” trees. For example, focusing on native Southern California trees (i.e., Coast Live Oak, Toyon). 5. Limit tree removal/trimming notification letters to cases when the Director denies an application and an appeal is filed or for instances when the removal/trimming is associated with land development. For example, notifying only when decisions are contested or escalated, not for routine approvals that align with established criteria. 6. Integrate additional removal criteria to address fire risk and insurance factors. For example, incorporating language that aligns with State laws that require building defensible space for fire safety on properties. 7. Eliminate removal criteria related to the unreasonable hardship to property owner by denial of the permit (34.11(a)(2)). 8. Eliminate removal criteria related to the replacement trees being of greater value or benefit (34.11(a)(4)). 9. Revise the number of required replacement trees for all tree removal applications. Allow flexibility in replacement size and require replacement trees to be “protected” species only. For example, consider capping the replacement requirement at three trees, to be planted as minimum 24-inch box specimens, and selected from the City’s “protected tree” species list. The recommended number of replacement trees is listed in the table below. NOT ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT PROJECT One replacement tree shall be required for each tree removed with a caliper between 0- 16 inches. Two replacement trees shall be required for each tree removed with a caliper between 0- 16 inches. Two replacement trees shall be required for each tree removed with a caliper of more than 16 inches and less than or equal to 32 inches. Four replacement trees shall be required for each tree removed with a caliper of more than 16 inches and less than or equal to 32 inches. 226417

Three replacement trees shall be required for each tree removed with a caliper of more than 32 inches. Six replacement trees shall be required for each tree removed with a caliper of more than 32 inches. 10. Revise the ordinance to ensure that fees related to appeals for tree related permits are incurred by the appellant. For example, if a resident appeals a tree removal decision – that resident would be responsible for the appeal fee instead of the property owner who submitted the original application. 11. Revise ordinance to eliminate subjective criteria in violation assessments, enabling staff to apply enforcement consistently and fairly. For example, remove ambiguous language on protected trees to provide clear, measurable standards that staff can uniformly enforce. 12. Amend the ordinance to exempt the City and its contractors from the requirement to obtain tree removal or trimming permits. This exemption would enable timely removal of hazardous trees that pose immediate public safety risks and avoid delays to previously approved capital improvement projects. In addition to the ordinance revisions recommended above, the following items will support the tree ordinance update and provide clearer guidance to residents as they navigate the revised process. Create guideline/check list to streamline permitting criteria for trimming and removal, providing clear guidelines early in the process – for example, through an online checklist to help applicants understand requirements and submit complete applications. Utilize existing City communication channels to promote tree care best practices—for example, creating a social media campaign for seasonal trimming reminders aimed at oaks and other native trees listed on the “protected tree” species list. Develop a comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan that establishes a long- term, holistic approach to tree canopy preservation including, but not limited to, tree planting, maintenance, species selection and risk reduction. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact in providing direction to staff on updating this ordinance. Commission Review and Recommendation This item was reviewed by the Natural Resources & Environmental Commission (NREC) (Attachment 4), Public Safety Commission, and Public Works Infrastructure Commission during their regular meetings in May and June. The Public Safety and Public Works Infrastructure Commissions concurred with the feedback provided to staff by NREC and the proposed changes to the ordinance laid out in the staff recommendations. NREC held a special meeting for a final review and recommendation of the revisions listed in this report. 226518

Attachment: Attachment 1_South Pasadena Municipal Code: Chapter 34 Attachment 2_Ordinance 2398 Attachment 3_Resolution 7360: List of Protected Native Trees Attachment 4_NREC Tree Ordinance Review Presentation Attachment 5_July 16, 2025 City Council Meeting Presentation 226619

CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Sections: 34.1 Definitions. 34.2 Maintenance of trees on private property. 34.3 Maintenance of trees on public property. 34.4 Tree protection required in connection with development activity. 34.5 Tree trimming permit applications. 34.6 Procedure for consideration of tree trimming/removal applications. 34.7 Criteria for approving tree trimming permit applications. 34.8 Appeals of tree trimming permit decisions. 34.9 Tree removal permit applications. 34.10 Procedure for consideration of tree trimming/removal applications. 34.11 Criteria for approving tree removal permit applications. 34.12 Tree removal and replacement plans. 34.12-5 Replacement tree requirements. 34.13 Appeals of tree removal permit decisions. 34.14 Exemptions. 34.15 Obstruction. 34.16 Violations. 34.17 Penalties. 34.18 Administrative regulations. * Prior legislation: Ords. 1991, 2051, 2126, 2188, 2191 and 2237. * For state law as to “Tree Planting Act of 1931,” see Sts. & H C.A., §§ 22000 to 22202. As to “Park and Playground Act of 1909,” see Gov. C.A., §§ 38000 to The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 1 of 39 226720

38213. As to hitching animals to trees, see § 5.12 of this Code. As to collection of brush, tree, etc., trimmings and stumps, see § 16.14. As to removal of trees from parks, see § 21.7. 34.1 Definitions. As used in this chapter: (a) “Caliper” means the diameter of the trunk of a tree measured at four feet above natural grade. In the case of multi-trunked trees, “caliper” is the sum of each trunk measured at four feet above the grade. (b) “Certified arborist” means a professional in tree care industry who has received their arborist certification through the International Society of Arboriculture. (c) “City arborist” means a certified arborist designated by the director. (d) “Commission” means the natural resources and environmental commission (NREC). (e) “Damage” means any action taken which causes injury, disfigurement or death of a tree. (f) “Deadwood” means limbs, branches or a portion of a tree void of green leaves during a season of the year when green leaves should be present. (g) “Development” shall be defined per the city zoning code, SPMC 36.700.020. (h) “Director” means public works director. (i) “Drip line” means a series of points formed by the vertical dripping of water from the outermost branches and leaves of a tree. (j) “Front yard” means that portion of private property as designated in the city zoning code. (k) “Heritage tree” means a tree of historical value because it is a South Pasadena historical landmark. A heritage tree may be located on private or public property. (l) “Intentional violation” means a violation of this chapter (Trees and Shrubs) that is committed by any person or entity who has actual or presumed knowledge of, or who has previously violated, its provisions. A commercial certified The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 2 of 39 226821

arborist/tree trimmer, a real estate developer, a general contractor, or anyone who has previously filed an application for a tree trimming or tree removal permit in the city shall be presumed to know the provisions of this chapter. (m) “ISA” means the International Society of Arboriculture. (n) “Mature tree” means any variety of tree that has a caliper of at least four inches or more. (o) “Native species tree” means any species of tree native to Southern California as defined by ordinance or resolution adopted by the city council. (p) “Oak tree” means species of tree of the genus Quercus. (q) “Planning review authority” means the individual or official city body (director of planning and building, design review board, cultural heritage commission, planning commission or city council) identified by the city zoning code as having responsibility and authority to review and approve or disapprove the development permit applications described in Article 6 of the city zoning code (Zoning Code Administration). (r) “Protected shrub” means a woody plant that is over 16 feet in height, which has one or more trunk(s) equal to or greater than a four-inch diameter. (s) “Protected tree” means a heritage tree, mature oak tree, mature native species tree, significant tree, or protected shrub. (t) “Protection” means the safeguarding of trees through proper treatment. (u) “Real estate developer” means a person or entity that is engaged in the business of constructing or rehabilitating commercial or residential structures within the city for sale or lease to third parties. (v) “Removal” means uprooting, cutting or severing of the main trunk of a tree. (w) “Shrub” means a woody plant that is less than 16 feet in height and may be multi-stemmed. (x) “Significant tree” means any variety of tree that has a caliper of one foot or more. (y) “Standard of care” means compliance with ANSI standards for tree care, irrigation, and maintenance, including trimming of foliage for tree or shrub. (z) “Tree” means a woody perennial usually having one dominant trunk and a The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 3 of 39 226922

mature height greater than 16 feet. (aa) “Trimming” means cutting into the live wood of a tree or shrub to remove limbs and/or branches. (bb) “ANSI” means American National Standards Institute. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.2 Maintenance of trees on private property. Private property owners shall be responsible for the maintenance of trees on their property in accordance with the standard of care described in SPMC 34.1(y). Pruning of oak trees and other trees should be limited to the removal of deadwood and the correction of potentially hazardous conditions as evaluated by a qualified certified arborist and approved by the director through the city’s tree trimming permitting process. All pruning should be done in accordance with ISA pruning standards. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.3 Maintenance of trees on public property. The public works department shall be responsible for the maintenance of trees on public property including but not limited to public rights-of-way and public parks. The public works department shall prepare and implement the annual work plan for the maintenance of trees on public property. The adjacent property owner or tenant is responsible for irrigation of parkway trees in accordance with Chapter 31 SPMC. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.4 Tree protection required in connection with development activity. (a) Development must not interfere with tree standard of care. Irrigation should be administered to replace any soil moisture lost due to site excavation and a tree should continue to receive the amount of irrigation needed to thrive. (b) Development shall not cause any physical damage to the limbs, bark, crown, or where the roots join the stem. (c) No grading shall occur within the drip line of a protected tree. All work conducted within the protected drip line area should be accomplished only with hand tools and all activity within this area should be kept to a minimum to minimize soil compaction. This area should not be subjected to incidental construction work or to disposal of construction debris, including but not limited to paint, plaster or chemical solutions. (d) Natural or preconstruction grade should be maintained per the recommendations of the city arborist in accordance with ANSI standards. At no The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 4 of 39 227023

time during or after construction should soil be in contact with the trunk of any tree above natural grade. (e) No structure shall be located nor shall any construction requiring a permit occur within six feet of the trunk of a protected tree. No building, structure, wall or impervious paving shall be constructed within the drip line of any mature oak tree. Limited exceptions may be allowed by the director and documented on the permit. (f) Any required trenching should be routed to minimize root damage and cutting of roots should be avoided by placing pipes and cables above or below uncut roots. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.5 Tree trimming permit applications. (a) A tree trimming permit shall be required if: (1) More than 10 percent of the live foliage or limbs of a mature oak tree or mature native species tree will be removed within a 12-month period; or (2) More than 20 percent of the live foliage or limbs of any heritage tree will be removed within a 12-month period. (b) Any person applying for a tree trimming permit shall file with the director an application in writing on a form furnished by the director. The application shall contain the following information: (1) The name and residence or business address of the applicant; (2) The location and description of the property on which the trees are located; (3) A description of the proposed work including the reason for tree trimming. Photographs may be provided as exhibits, if desired; (4) The name and state contractor’s license number of the person who will perform the work. Permits shall only be issued to persons possessing a C-27 or C-61 (D-49) state contracting license; (5) Additional information as the director may require. (c) The application shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee in an amount established by resolution of the city council. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.6 Procedure for consideration of tree trimming/removal applications. (a) For tree trimming permit applications associated with development: The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 5 of 39 227124

(a) For tree trimming permit applications associated with development: (1) Upon receipt of the completed application, the director shall cause notice to be sent by first-class mail to property owners and tenants of property located within a 100-foot radius of the property to be developed. Such property owners shall be given 15 calendar days from the date of mailing within which to comment on the application. All comments shall be made in writing and submitted to the director. The notification process may be waived if noticing associated with the development is being sent as required by the planning review authority and such notice specifically identifies the proposed trimming of trees. (2) The director, after considering the application pursuant to the criteria set forth in SPMC 34.7, and any comments received from interested residents, shall provide the planning review authority with recommendations and conditions of approval associated with the proposed tree trimming application. The director’s recommendations and conditions of approval shall be considered advisory to the planning review authority’s decision associated with the development. (3) When tree trimming permits associated with development are referred to the commission, the commission shall provide the planning review authority with recommendations and conditions of approval associated with the proposed tree trimming application. The commission’s recommendations and conditions of approval shall be advisory to the planning review authority decision associated with the development. (4) Tree trimming associated with development shall only be conditionally approved subject to the applicant receiving their development building permit and paying all fees associated with the tree trimming as established by resolution of the city council. Upon the planning review authority’s approval of the development application and applicable conditions of approval, and payment of all required fees, the applicant shall be issued a tree trimming permit. (b) For tree trimming permit applications not associated with development: (1) Upon receipt of the completed application, the director shall cause notice to be sent by first-class mail to property owners and tenants of property located within a 100-foot radius of the subject property. Such property owners shall be given 15 calendar days from the date of mailing within which to comment on the application. All comments shall be made in writing and submitted to the director. The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 6 of 39 227225

(2) Upon expiration of the 15-day period, the application shall be reviewed by the director, who shall, after considering the application pursuant to the criteria set forth in SPMC 34.7, and any comments received from interested residents, approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application. The decision of the director shall be made in writing and provided to the applicant and to any interested persons who commented on the application. (3) The decision of the director shall take effect 15 calendar days after the date of mailing of the decision to the applicant and any interested persons to allow for the filing of any appeals. Unless the director’s decision is appealed to the commission, upon payment of all fees associated with the tree trimming as established by resolution of the city council, the applicant shall be issued a tree trimming permit. (c) The director may refer any application for a tree trimming permit to the commission for any of the following reasons: (1) The city receives reasonable objections during the notification period; or (2) An appeal of the director’s decision has been filed in accordance with this chapter; or (3) At the discretion of the director. Should the application be referred to the commission, the commission shall make its recommendation (if the permit application is associated with development) or decision (if the permit application is not associated with development) during a noticed public meeting. A decision of the commission shall not take effect until 15 calendar days after the date of the public meeting have elapsed to allow for the filing of an appeal. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.7 Criteria for approving tree trimming permit applications. (a) A tree trimming permit may be issued in either of the following instances: (1) Where a written determination has been made by a certified arborist that the excess foliage or limbs of the tree pose a reasonable risk of injury or harm to persons or property or are substantially interfering with the structural integrity or the use of an existing structure (including, but not limited to, a fence or wall) and there is no feasible and reasonable alternative to mitigate the interference; or (2) Where a written determination has been made by a certified arborist, The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 7 of 39 227326

after a visual inspection or scientific evaluation, that the limbs proposed to be trimmed are diseased or damaged. The director or commission may waive the requirement for a certified arborist’s written statement when the proposed limbs to be trimmed can reasonably be determined to be dead by a layperson’s visual inspection, or when, after conducting an inspection of the tree, the director determines that the tree poses an obvious and imminent threat to life or property. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.8 Appeals of tree trimming permit decisions. (a) Appealing Tree Trimming Permit Decisions Associated with Development. (1) Tree trimming decisions associated with development are advisory to the planning review authority as a condition of approval of development. The applicant may appeal any development decision and conditions of approval pursuant to the appeal process set forth in the zoning code. (b) Appealing Tree Removal Permit Applications Not Associated with Development. (1) The applicant or any interested party may appeal the decision of the director to the commission by filing an appeal in writing submitted to the commission staff liaison within 15 calendar days after the date of decision of the director. (2) Decisions of the commission may be appealed to the city council by filing such appeal in writing submitted to the city clerk within 15 calendar days after the date of decision of the commission. The appeal shall specifically identify the grounds upon which the appeal will be taken and summarize the facts and points of law in support of the appeal. (c) The appellant shall be responsible for all actual costs, including staff time, associated with any appeals. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.9 Tree removal permit applications. (a) Any person applying for a tree removal permit shall file with the director an application in writing on a form furnished by the director. The application shall contain the following information: (1) The name and residence or business address of the applicant; (2) The location or description of the property on which the proposed trees are to be removed; The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 8 of 39 227427

(3) A description of the proposed work including the reason for tree removal. Photographs may be included as exhibits, if desired; (4) A tree removal and replacement plan in accordance with this chapter; (5) The name and state contractor’s license number of the person who will perform the work. Permits shall only be issued to persons possessing a C-27 or C-61 (D-49) state contracting license; (6) Additional information as the director may require. This information may include, but is not limited to, a list obtained from the county assessor of the names of the owners of all parcels within a 100-foot radius of the property upon which the trees are to be removed or trimmed. (b) In addition to the application requirements of subsection (a) of this section, tree removal applications associated with development shall include all of the following: (1) An arborist report prepared by a certified arborist; (2) Project narrative; (3) The proposed development plan depicting the actual and proposed location of structures, topography and existing trees, whether to be retained or proposed for removal; (4) Site plan with elevations showing before and after sight lines of the properties landscaping and trees; (5) Any other information the director or commission deems necessary for reviewing the tree removal application. (c) The application shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee in an amount established by resolution of the city council. (Ord. No. 2328, § 1 (part), 2019.) 34.10 Procedure for consideration of tree trimming/removal applications. (a) For tree removal permit applications associated with development: (1) The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the tree removal application review and processing in accordance with the fees established by resolution of the city council. (2) Upon receipt of the completed application, the director shall cause notice to be sent by first-class mail to property owners and tenants of property located within a 100-foot radius of the subject property. Such The South Pasadena Municipal Code is current through Ordinance No. 2399, passed May 21, 2025. South Pasadena Municipal Code CHAPTER 34 TREES AND SHRUBS* Page 9 of 39 227528

property located within a 100-foot radius of the subject property. Such property owners shall be given 15 calendar days from the date of mailing within which to comment on the application. All comments shall be made in writing and submitted to the director. The notification process may be waived if noticing associated with the development is being sent as required by the planning review authority and such notice specifically identifies the proposed removal of trees. (3) The director, after considering the application pursuant to the criteria set forth in SPMC 34.11 and any comments received from interested residents, shall provide the planning review authority with recommendations and conditions of approval associated with the proposed tree removal application. The director’s recommendations and conditions of approval shall be considered advisory to the planning review authority’s decision associated with the development. (4) When tree removal permits associated with development are referred to the commission, the commission shall provide the planning review authority with recommendations and conditions of approval associated with the proposed tree removal application. The commission’s recommendations and conditions of approval shall be advisory to the planning review authority decision associated with the development. (5) Tree removals associated with development shall only be conditionally approved subject to the applicant receiving their development building permit, paying all fees associated with the tree removal as established by resolution of the city council, and paying a deposit for the required replacement trees, in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of all required replacement trees, as determined by the city’s arborist. Upon the planning review authority’s approval of the development application and satisfaction of all conditions of approval, and payment of all required fees, the applicant shall be issued a tree removal permit.