Village Community Development District No. 5

MINUTES OF MEETING VILLAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 A meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Village Community Development District No. 5 was held on Tuesday, February 10, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. at the SeaBreeze Recreation Center, 2384 Buena Vista Boulevard, The Villages, Florida, 32162. Board members present and constituting a quorum: Gary Kadow Chair Walter Martin Supervisor Jerry Knoll Supervisor Jerry Ferlisi Supervisor Staff Present: Brittany Wilson Assistant District Manager Mark Brionez District Counsel Herschel Wiley District Property Management Assistant Director Shannon Boyd Community Standards Assistant Director Shawn Boyle Chief Financial Officer Katie Evans Senior Deputy District Clerk Heather Evans Assistant District Clerk FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS: Call to Order 1.A. Roll Call Chair Kadow called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. and stated for the record that four (4) Supervisors were present representing a quorum. Mark Schweikert was an excused absence. 1.B. Pledge of Allegiance Chair Kadow led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.C. Observation of a Moment of Silence The Board and audience in attendance observed a moment of silence for those who serve our Country and community.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 2 1.D. Welcome Meeting Attendees The Board welcomed all those in attendance. SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS: Consent Agenda Chair Kadow advised the Board that a motion to approve the Consent Agenda is a motion to approve all recommended actions. All matters on the Consent Agenda are considered routine, and no discussion is required unless desired by a Board Supervisor or a member of the public. On MOTION by Jerry Knoll, seconded by Walter Martin, with all in favor, the Board took formal action on the following items included on the Consent Agenda: 2.A. Approval of the Minutes for the Board Meeting held on January 6, 2026. 2.B Approval of the issuance of a Purchase Order utilizing the District’s Agreement #21B-003 with Honey-Do’s LLC in the amount of $147,087.88 for the District 5 Wall Painting Project. THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS: New Business 3.A. Supervisor Knoll: Project Wide Advisory Committee After Agenda Supervisor Knoll advised that the After Agenda from the Project Wide Advisory Committee (PWAC) meeting held on February 9, 2026 was provided to the Board, as information, and highlighted the following: • The Committee recommended award of ITB #26B-005 Lake Sumter Landing Shoreline Revetment Project to Consolidated Land Services, Inc. in the amount of $653,752.58 to the Sumter Landing Community Development District (SLCDD) Board. • The Committee recommended issuance of a Purchase Order utilizing Agreement #23Q-019 with Tetra Tech in the total amount of $125,850.00 for professional services for the Lake Miona Regional Recreation Center HVAC Replacement Project to the SLCDD Board. • The Committee recommended award for ITB #26B-003 Sound Systems Replacements at Various District Locations to Koncept Systems, LLC in the total amount of $844,099.17 for 10 Sumter Landing Amenities Division (SLAD) Fund recreation centers to the SLCDD Board.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 3 Supervisor Martin requested confirmation on whether the sound system replacements at the recreation centers are intended for individuals to plug into the existing audio system for club meetings and events rather than being standalone systems. Supervisor Knoll advised that the sound systems are for club meetings and events. Chair Kadow inquired if updated video components were included in the sound system replacements. Supervisor Knoll advised that certain recreation centers will receive upgrades that will include the replacement of cart-mounted projectors with ceiling-mounted projectors. 3.B. Acceptance of Audit Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Shawn Boyle, Chief Financial Officer, advised that Staff is requesting that the Board accept the Audit Report for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025 and expressed his appreciation to the Board and Staff for their participation in preparing and monitoring the financials throughout the year. Chair Kadow inquired if the questionnaire that the Chairs received from Purvis Gray was a newly implemented document. Mr. Boyle advised that Purvis Gray conducts interviews and may send questionnaires to one or more Board members inquiring if there are any unusual situations they would like Purvis Gray to review. Helen Painter of Purvis Gray, the District’s Auditor, advised that the Financial Audit is required by Florida Statutes for all Local Governments with a primary focus on Financial Statements and notes. The reporting package contains the Independent Auditors Report, internal audit controls, financial reporting, Auditor General Management Letter and Special District reporting requirements. Ms. Painter stated that it is the Auditors’ objective to ensure that the accounting records are kept in accordance with government auditing standards and follow GASB for government accounting. The Independent Auditor’s Report states that the District has received an unmodified clean opinion and based on the results of the audit procedures performed, the accounting information presented was accurate, and no audit adjustments were made. Ms. Painter stated that a review of the District’s Investment Policy and internal controls was also completed, and no weaknesses were identified or recommendations provided. Ms. Painter stated that for the fiscal year ending on September 30, 2025, there were no significant transactions within the District, and the correct amount of maintenance assessments have been collected.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 4 Chair Kadow expressed his appreciation to Staff and Purvis Gray for their efforts in the preparation of the audit and monitoring the District’s financials throughout the year. Supervisor Martin inquired if Purvis Gray provides recommendations about the adequate level of the District’s reserves or if that is determined internally by Staff and expressed concern that if reserves are too high the Board should consider spending down those reserves instead of maintaining excess reserves. Ms. Painter advised that Purvis Gray completes an annual review to ensure that the Board is in compliance with the District’s adopted Reserve Policy. The Board budgeted to spend $800,000 of reserves and Purvis Gray will continue to review the reserves annually to ensure those funds are spent appropriately. Supervisor Martin requested confirmation that Purvis Grey does not make recommendations to the Board about reserve levels. Ms. Painter stated that Purvis Gray does not make recommendations about reserve levels. Chair Kadow stated that the Board has not raised the District’s maintenance assessment levels in over 16 years, but in response to the Board’s concern whether sufficient reserves existed to continue funding the District’s expenditures, without increasing the maintenance assessment levels, an increase to the reserves was budgeted. Chair Kadow inquired if the increased budget would negate the need to increase the maintenance assessment levels. Ms. Painter stated that to date Purvis Gray has completed a review of the District’s financial statements through November 30, 2025 and would need to wait until the end of the current fiscal year to assess the full results of operations. Supervisor Knoll inquired whether there are generally accepted accounting principles or State guidelines that establish a recommended reserve amount or percentage instead of utilizing the value of the infrastructure. Ms. Painter advised that the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recommends maintaining a fund balance of approximately 25% of annual general expenditures. Future capital outlay costs can be difficult to project due to fluctuating costs. There is no formal statewide guidance for capital reserves and determining the appropriate levels is a Board policy decision. On MOTION by Jerry Ferlisi, seconded by Jerry Knoll, with all in favor, the Board accepted the Village Community Development District No. 5 Audit Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 5 FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: Public Hearing 4.A. Case No. D5-06-26 VCDD No. 5 vs. To the Estate of Gerald J. Stafinsky, 2186 Broxton Place A. District Counsel Overview of Public Hearing Process Mark Brionez, District Counsel, provided an overview of the Public Hearing process as information to the Board and residents in attendance. B. Swearing-In of Those Providing Evidence/Testimony Katie Evans, Senior Deputy District Clerk, administered the swearing in of those individuals who identified that they would be providing evidence and/or testimony in this case. C. Open Public Hearing Chair Kadow opened the Public Hearing at 8:21 a.m. D. Staff Presentation of the Facts Shannon Boyd, Community Standards Assistant Director, advised the Board that Case No. D5- 06-26 Village Community Development District (VCCDD) No. 5 vs. C Estate of Gerald J. Stafinsky, 2186 Broxton Place, Unit 83, Lot 241, is in violation of the District's Rule to Bring About Deed Compliance, and specifically the Rule that states: "No vehicles incapable of operation shall be stored on any Homesite nor shall any junk vehicles or equipment be kept on any Homesite and that Owners shall keep their Homesites neat and clean and the grass cut, irrigated and edged at all times…” Ms. Boyd advised that on November 25, 2025 a complaint was received regarding a broken door, broken windows and inoperable vehicle in the driveway. Staff verified the violations and also observed weeds and a dirty driveway/walkway. A Deed Restriction reminder was written on November 26, 2025 and the initial and second letters were sent on December 9,2025 and December 22, 2025. After following the Procedures for Compliance of External Deed Restrictions, a Notice of Public Hearing was sent by regular mail and certified mail on January 12, 2026. Ms. Boyd advised that the homeowner is deceased. The homeowner' s daughter was residing in the home but is currently incarcerated. Staff has contacted Freedom Mortgage via telephone to inform them of the violations and has forwarded copy of all of the letters and photographs. During an inspection of the property on February 8, 2025, it was determined that the property remains out of compliance. Due to the Phase II water shortage restriction effective February 8 through July 1, 2026, Staff is temporarily suspending enforcement of the pressure washing

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 6 requirements until the drought order has been lifted. Ms. Boyd advised that Staff is recommending that the Board find the Owner in violation of the District's Deed Compliance Rule as cited by the Deed Compliance Staff; Owner has seven (7) days to remove the weeds from the property to bring that portion of the property into compliance; if the weeds have been removed and that portion of the property has been brought into compliance within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, that portion of Case No. D5-06-26 shall be closed; if the weeds have not been removed within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, authorize the District to maintain the property and impose a minimum of a $250 fine or the actual cost of maintenance, whichever is more to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice; authorize the District to maintain the property twice a month in the summer and once a month in the winter as needed and impose a $250 fine each time the District maintains the property; if the Owner prohibits the District from maintaining the property then the Owner shall be fined an initial amount of $150 and an additional $50 per day until the property is brought into compliance; Owner has five (5) days to remove the inoperable vehicle or place a valid registration sticker on the vehicle to bring that portion of the property into compliance; if the inoperable vehicle has been removed or a valid registration sticker has been placed on the vehicle within five (5) days of the Order of Enforcement, that portion of Case No. D5-06-26 shall be close; if the inoperable vehicle has not been removed or a valid registration sticker has not been placed on the vehicle within five (5) days of the Order of Enforcement, impose a $150 fine to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until the property is brought into compliance; Owner has thirty (30) days to repair or replace the broken windows, torn lanai screen, broken screen door and the damaged siding on the lanai; if the windows, lanai screens, screen door siding on the lanai have all been repaired or replaced within thirty (30) days of the Order of Enforcement, that portion of Case No. D5-06-26 shall be closed; if the broken windows, torn lanai screens, broken screen door and damaged siding on the lanai have not been repaired or replaced within thirty (30) days of the Order of Enforcement, impose a $150 fine to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until that portion of the property is brought into compliance; if the weeds have been removed, the inoperable vehicle has been removed or a valid registration sticker has been placed on the vehicle and if the broken windows, torn lanai screen, broken screen door and the damaged siding on the lanai have all been repaired or replaced within the timeframes specified herein, Case No. D5-06-26 shall be closed; if the property is not brought into

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 7 compliance as required herein, Staff shall record this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien in the Public Records of Sumter County, Florida; it is the Owner's responsibility to contact the Community Standards Department to request a Deed Compliance Officer revisit the property to confirm compliance; if the fines reach $1,500 the case shall be turned over to District Counsel to seek all available remedies which may include initiating a lawsuit and seeking an injunction against the Owner; the Owner is responsible for reimbursing the District for all attorneys' fees, costs and expenses associated with, or related to, this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien; if the property is brought into compliance and all fines are paid, the Chair authorizes staff to execute and record a Satisfaction/Release of Claim of Lien; Chair to execute the Order of Enforcement. Chair Kadow requested confirmation that the property is listed under an estate. Ms. Boyd advised that is correct. Chair Kadow expressed concern that fines can continue to accrue and inquired about the options that are available to the Board. Mr. Brionez stated that notices appear to have been posted on the door and stated that if the property in in foreclosure, the District would need to ensure that a lien has been recorded. Ms. Boyd stated that Staff believes that the notices posted on the door are eviction notices. Mr. Brionez requested clarification if the daughter is the owner of the property. Ms. Boyd advised that the home was being rented. Chair Kadow inquired if Staff is aware of any squatting that has occurred at the property. Ms. Boyd advised that Staff is not aware of any squatters at the property. Chair Kadow requested that Staff research the property records to confirm ownership and determine whether the property is in foreclosure. Mr. Brionez advised that Staff can conduct a records search of the property and coordinate with District Counsel, if necessary. Supervisor Martin inquired if the District could waive or suspend the compliance timeline for cases where a property is listed under an estate, so that fines do not continue to accrue. Ms. Boyd advised that Staff follows the standard timeline for owners to bring a property into compliance. Mr. Brionez stated that under the circumstances the Board can choose to reduce the timeframe for compliance since no one is residing at the property. Chair Kadow provided support for reducing the compliance time fame.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 8 Mr. Brionez stated that the Board may elect to reduce the number of days provided to repair or replace the broken windows, torn lanai screen, broken screen door and damaged siding on the lanai. The timeframes for the remaining violations are already set at a shorter duration. E. Owner/Interested Parties No public comment was received. F. Close Public Hearing Chair Kadow closed the Public Hearing at 8:32 a.m. The Board provided consensus to reduce the amount of days from 30 to 10 days to repair or replace the broken windows, torn lanai screen, broken screen door and the damaged siding on the lanai G. Board Determination On MOTION by Jerry Knoll, seconded by Jerry Ferlisi, the Board found the Owner of 2186 Broxton Place, Unit 83, Lot 241, in violation of the District's Deed Compliance Rule as cited by the Deed Compliance Staff; Owner has seven (7) days to remove the weeds from the property to bring that portion of the property into compliance; if the weeds have been removed and that portion of the property has been brought into compliance within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, that portion of Case No. D5-06-26 shall be closed; if the weeds have not been removed within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, authorize the District to maintain the property and impose a minimum of a $250 fine or the actual cost of maintenance, whichever is more to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice; authorize the District to maintain the property twice a month in the summer and once a month in the winter as needed and impose a $250 fine each time the District maintains the property; if the Owner prohibits the District from maintaining the property then the Owner shall be fined an initial amount of $150 and an additional $50 per day until the property is brought into compliance; Owner has five (5) days to remove the inoperable vehicle or place a valid registration sticker on the vehicle to bring that portion of the property into compliance; if the inoperable vehicle has been removed or a valid registration sticker has been placed on the vehicle within five (5) days of the Order of Enforcement, that portion of Case No. D5-06-26 shall be close; if the inoperable vehicle has not been removed or a valid registration sticker has not been placed on the vehicle within five (5) days of the Order of Enforcement, impose a $150 fine to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until the property is brought into compliance; Owner has ten (10) days to repair or replace the broken windows, torn lanai screen, broken screen door, and the damaged siding on the lanai; if the windows, lanai screens, screen door, and siding on the lanai have all been repaired or replaced within ten (10) of the Order of Enforcement, that portion of Case No. D5-06-26 shall be closed;

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 9 if the broken windows, torn lanai screens, broken screen door and damaged siding on the lanai have not been repaired or replaced within thirty (30) days of the Order of Enforcement, impose a $150 fine to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until that portion of the property is brought into compliance; if the weeds have been removed, the inoperable vehicle has been removed or a valid registration sticker has been placed on the vehicle and if the broken windows, torn lanai screen, broken screen door and the damaged siding on the lanai have all been repaired or replaced within the timeframes specified herein, Case No. D5-06-26 shall be closed; if the property is not brought into compliance as required herein, Staff shall record this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien in the Public Records of Sumter County, Florida; it is the Owner's responsibility to contact the Community Standards Department to request a Deed Compliance Officer revisit the property to confirm compliance; if the fines reach $1,500 the case shall be turned over to District Counsel to seek all available remedies which may include initiating a lawsuit and seeking an injunction against the Owner; the Owner is responsible for reimbursing the District for all attorneys' fees, costs and expenses associated with, or related to, this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien; if the property is brought into compliance and all fines are paid, the Chair authorizes staff to execute and record a Satisfaction/Release of Claim of Lien; Chair to execute the Order of Enforcement. 4.B. Case No. D5-07-26 VCDD No. 5 vs. Wanda F. Albert, 2051 Thurmond Avenue A. District Counsel Overview of Public Hearing Process This was previously provided. B. Swearing-In of Those Providing Evidence/Testimony This was previously provided. C. Open Public Hearing Chair Kadow opened the Public Hearing at 8:33 a.m. D. Staff Presentation of the Facts Ms. Boyd advised the Board that Case No. D5-07-26 VCCDD No. 5 vs. Wanda F. Albert, 2051 Thurmond Avenue, Unit 654, Lot 14, is in violation of the District's Rule to Bring About Deed Compliance, and specifically the Rule that states: “Owners shall keep their Homesites neat and clean…” Ms. Boyd advised that on November 18, 2025 a complaint was received regarding loose siding on the home. Staff verified the violation and issued a Deed Restriction reminder on November 19, 2025. The initial and second letters were sent on December 9, 2025 and December 22, 2025. After following the Procedures for Compliance of External Deed Restrictions, a Notice of Public Hearing was sent by

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 10 regular mail and certified mail on January 9, 2026. Ms. Boyd advised that the homeowner is deceased and the property is reverting back to the lender. Staff contacted Compulink about the violation and has forwarded copies of all the letters and photographs. Staff requested a status update and was advised that the request would be expedited; however, during an inspection of the property on February 8, 2026, it was determined that the property remains out of compliance. Ms. Boyd advised that Staff is recommending that the Board find the Owner in violation of the District's Deed Compliance Rule as cited by the Deed Compliance Staff; Owner has thirty (30) days to repair or replace the loose siding in the home to bring the property into compliance; if the loose siding has been repaired or replaced and the property is brought into compliance within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, Case No. D5- 07-26 shall be closed; if the loose siding has not been repaired or replaced and the property is not brought into compliance within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, impose a $150 fine to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until the property is brought into compliance; if the property is not brought into compliance as required herein, Staff shall record this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien in the Public Records of Sumter County, Florida; it is the Owner's responsibility to contact the Community Standards Department to request a Deed Compliance Officer revisit the property to confirm compliance; if the fines reach $1,500 the case shall be turned over to District Counsel to seek all available remedies which may include initiating a lawsuit and seeking an injunction against the Owner; the Owner is responsible for reimbursing the District for all attorneys' foes, costs and expenses associated with, or related to, this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien; if the property is brought into compliance and all fines are paid, the Chair authorizes Staff to execute and record a Satisfaction/Release of Claim of Lien; Chair to execute the Order of Enforcement. Chair Kadow requested clarification on the name of the vendor. Ms. Boyd advised that the vendor is Compulink. Supervisor Martin requested clarification on the reason the property is being referenced under the homeowner’s name rather than the lender. Ms. Boyd advised that the homeowner is still listed as the legal owner of record. E. Owner/Interested Parties No public comment was received. F. Close Public Hearing

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 11 Chair Kadow closed the Public Hearing at 8:37 a.m. G. Board Determination On MOTION by Jerry Knoll, seconded by Jerry Ferlisi, the Board found the Owner of 2051 Thurmond Avenue, Unit 654, Lot 14, in violation of the District's Deed Compliance Rule as cited by the Deed Compliance Staff; Owner has thirty (30) days to repair or replace the loose siding in the home to bring the property into compliance; if the loose siding has been repaired or replaced and the property is brought into compliance within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, Case No. D5-07-26 shall be closed; if the loose siding has not been repaired or replaced and the property is not brought into compliance within seven (7) days of the Order of Enforcement, impose a $150 fine to be paid within ten (10) days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until the property is brought into compliance; if the property is not brought into compliance as required herein, Staff shall record this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien in the Public Records of Sumter County, Florida; it is the Owner's responsibility to contact the Community Standards Department to request a Deed Compliance Officer revisit the property to confirm compliance; if the fines reach $1,500 the case shall be turned over to District Counsel to seek all available remedies which may include initiating a lawsuit and seeking an injunction against the Owner; the Owner is responsible for reimbursing the District for all attorneys' foes, costs and expenses associated with, or related to, this Order of Enforcement/Claim of Lien; if the property is brought into compliance and all fines are paid, the Chair authorizes Staff to execute and record a Satisfaction/Release of Claim of Lien; Chair to execute the Order of Enforcement. Chair Kadow requested that the record reflect his appreciation to Staff for their diligent efforts. FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: Old Business 5.A. Old Business Status Update Brittany Wilson, Assistant District Manager, provided the following Old Business Status Update: • Track Deed Compliance Complaints for one year period: Per the Board’s request, the number of Deed Compliance Complaints will be brought back to the Board on an annual basis at the November Board Meeting. • Case No. D5-06-23, 703 Sanderling and the sale and purchase of the property; Provide process/restrictions for home rebuild; Request assistance from Congressman Webster’s Office to intervene with HUD: A case was opened with Congressman Webster's Office on December 1,

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 12 2025 pertaining to the HUD foreclosure process. An update is due back from HUD on February 20, 2026 and Staff will provide an update once received. SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: Informational Items Only 6.A. Financial Statements The Financial Statements as of December 31, 2025 were provided to the Board as information. 6.B. DPM Monthly Report The DPM Monthly Report was provided to the Board as information. 6.C. Revision 1 to the VCCDD Purchasing Procedure Manual The Revision 1 update to the VCCDD Purchasing Procedure Manual was provided to the Board as information. SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: District Manager Reports 7.A. GovBuilt - ARC Update Ms. Boyd provided an overview of the new GovBuilt Architectural Review Application online submittal process and advised that the new software has streamlined communication with the residents who are now able to review their application and results online. The requirements to submit an application remain the same, and the necessary site plan information and supporting documentation can be uploaded directly to the system. Additionally, the contractor and homeowner can include an email address to be kept updated on the application progress. Ms. Boyd advised that the system was implemented on December 1, 2025 and 2,500 applications have been received through the new online system. Supervisor Martin inquired if residents will be required to utilize the online application process or if paper applications will still be accepted. Ms. Boyd advised that Staff will accept paper applications but can also assist residents in completing the online application. Supervisor Knoll inquired if walk-in traffic has decreased since the online application process became active. Ms. Boyd advised that walk-in traffic has remained consistent, as most visits involve questions rather than simply dropping off an application.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 13 Cliff Weiner, Village of Piedmont, stated that the new process may need some adjustments because some pending applications do not reflect the results. Ms. Boyd stated that Staff is working to upload the results more promptly. Chair Kadow thanked the District’s Architectural Review Committee (ARC) primary representative, Kenneth Seaman, for his efforts on behalf of the residents. EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: District Counsel Reports 8.A. SWFWMD Phase II Water Shortage Order Mr. Brionez advised that in response to the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) Phase II Water Shortage mandatory water restrictions that were implemented on February 8, 2026 through July 1, 2026, Staff is presenting the Community Standards Temporary Enforcement Suspension Plan for the Board’s consideration, which establishes the temporary suspension of enforcement for specific deed restriction requirements that pertain to dead or missing sod, landscape replacement, pressure washing and surface cleaning, that would otherwise compel water use beyond what is permitted during the Phase II restriction period. Mr. Brionez advised that all scheduled or pending public hearings related to the referenced violations shall be temporarily suspended through July 1, 2026, unless lifted prior to this date, and requested that the Board approve the Community Standards Temporary Enforcement Suspension Plan. Supervisor Knoll inquired if the restrictions prohibits homes from being pressure washed or affects enforcement. Mr. Brionez stated that it is Staff’s understanding that a property owner may pressure wash their home when completing a project such as repainting. Staff cannot currently enforce Deed Restrictions based on water use regulations and suggested that residents review the SWFWMD restrictions. Chair Kadow requested clarification that any suspension would apply only under the Deed Restrictions. Mr. Brionez advised that is correct. On MOTION by Jerry Knoll, seconded by Jerry Ferlisi, with all in favor, the Board approved the Community Standards Temporary Enforcement Suspension Plan.

VCDD 5 – Meeting Minutes February 10, 2026 Page 14 NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: Audience Comments There were no audience comments received. TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: Supervisor Comments There were no Supervisor comments received. ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS: Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 8:53 a.m. On MOTION by Jerry Ferlisi, seconded by Jerry Knoll, with all in favor, the Board adjourned the meeting. Kenneth C. Blocker Gary Kadow Secretary Chairman

Chairman, I thank you, sir. Good morning everyone, and welcome to the Village Community Development District five Meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Appreciate you being here today. As we begin all our meetings, we have a roll call of who is present, uh, which would be Mr. Walter Martin present, Jerry Nolan. Here, Jerry Lesi present. Mark Sweer is excused today. And I'm Gary Cato, serving as your chair. If you would please rise for the ledge of allegiance and followed by a brief moment of silence. Alright, I pledge allegiance, United States of America and Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty. Liberty and justice. All. Thank you. You may be seated. Well, I was gonna go through my welcome speech today, but looking at the audience, I think probably most of you could come and run the meeting if you needed to. You've been here enough. Nice to see you again, Lee, while Mr. Shields, is he still in a room with us? Ien by the podium. Okay, Ken. Thank you. And Cliff. Okay, first thing on our agenda, item two A, uh, I was not at the last, uh, meeting. I'd like to thank the vice chair, even though he is not here today for taking that for me. Uh, uh, the approval of the minutes, which will require a, uh, a motion and also approval of the, uh, purchase orders. So the minutes I know you've had in advance. Any questions regarding the minutes from the board? Okay. Uh, you also have an agreement, what do we call it? The honey de of exterior painting services wall and so forth. Uh, that was under two B. That also would require a motion, but we can combine the two into one motion for both items two A and two B. There are any questions on either one of those? We'd entertain 'em now. Okay. May I have a motion then please? Motion to, uh, approve the consent agenda as submitted. Okay. The second, Second. Second. It's been moved and seconded to accept the approval of the minutes and the purchase order utilization, uh, to piggyback agreements in item two B. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? So moved. New business, Mr. Felicia, nice to see you back again and again. You're in our prayers. Thank you. Uh, but I'm sorry to say that I was sick yesterday, so I was not, uh, able to attend the project wide advisory committee, so I can't comment on the agenda. Okay. I believe Mr. Noel, uh, was there in your absence? I was, and, uh, it was a, a meeting that had a few items in it, that, of, of interest. Mm-hmm. There was the approval of the award of an invitation to bid Lake Sumter Landing Shoreline resentment project that's approximately $800,000, and that includes all of the construction work and construction management. Uh, there was the, uh, review and approval of the recommendation to Sumter Landing Development, dis Community Development District for purchase order, utilizing a certain agreement with TE Tech for the HVAC design and construction engineering services at Lake, my rec center. And that was for approximately 1.6 million. There was some review of the award for invitation to bid for the sound systems for, for various rec centers. 10 rec centers involved are gonna get new sound systems. Um, seven of the, uh, regionals and three of the neighborhood rec centers gonna be taken care of. The rest of the items on the, uh, agenda for the, that they were discussion items and, no, no, uh, pretty much routine making, but that's, that's my report for yesterday's PWAC meeting. Okay. Any questions regarding the PAC report? One question. Yes, sir. The sound system, are we talking about a sound system where you can, if you have a club meeting or something, you plug into the sound system and it goes to the rec center sound system, not a standalone? That's correct. Okay. Was video included in any of those? Do you know? Uh, there is some video work being done where, uh, those, those rec centers that have the old system, they're now gonna be getting a, a drop down system that's built into the, into the ceiling. Okay. Obviously, I think I'm technically challenged because when I click on the videos, I don't get the video, but I do get the audio, so I gotta check with somebody on that. Okay. Uh, that is not, let's see, the next item after, um, project wide advisory, there's no motion required on that, uh, is the item three b, acceptance of the audit report, which I'm sure everybody has gone through in great detail. I know we had that well in advance. Are there any questions at this point on the audit report? I think we have a presentation here. Yes, sir. I'm sorry, I didn't hear present any. My mistake. I love 'em when they go that way. That's okay. No. Uh, Sean Boyle Finance, uh, as you know, just for your audience, district five is required to have an audit each year of the financial statements by an independent firm. Uh, this firm actually works for the board. Um, you hire them, you retain them. The process of, of obtaining this independent auditor is dictated by the state. Um, we go through a formal, uh, procurement process for that. So this year's no different. Uh, that auditor is Purpose Gray, and they're gonna come up here and they're gonna go through some details. So I'll keep my, my comments brief. I would Mr. Chair, like to thank the board. I'd like to thank, uh, the employees. It takes, uh, pardon upon, but it takes a village to get this done, and this year is no exception. And I, I think you'll be pleased with the outcome. So, with that said, I have Ms. Helen Painter from Purpose Grace. She is a partner at that firm, and she's gonna go through some details and tell you how you ended up the year. And then, uh, if if's acceptable at the end and you're in agreement, we would look for a motion to accept this report. Okay. I also noticed that, uh, we received an email on this this year asking us if we had any comments, uh, anything we would like to discuss directly with the auditor that we thought may be unusual items or things we had questions on it, we think. Yes, sir. So every, I don't remember getting that before. Is that something new? Yeah. Every year they send out, uh, a questionnaire to, they interview individuals, but they also send out a questionnaire, um, asking, uh, one or more board members if there's any unusual, uh, situations that you may want them to look into. So I'll let Ms. Helen, uh, dive into that. And with that said here, she's, thank you. Good morning. Welcome. Morning. Good morning. Good Morning. Board supervisors, uh, Helen Painter with Purvis Grand Company. Uh, believe we have a slide presentation. Yes. Thank you for your, your comment on the, um, email. Uh, so we do that randomly, uh, and it, it's required by audit standards to, um, you know, ask, uh, I believe two years ago it was a treasurer that we, uh, inquired with. So we're required to ask, um, both financial and non-financial and those charged with governance. So the board of supervisors is considered to be the governing board over, um, the audit process where we work with management, but we answer to the board. Uh, and so, um, our presentation today is just a summary. We won't get into too much detail. You have the audit report there. Uh, the, the best thing about your finance team is that you get monthly financial information. Right? And so nothing is a surprise to you. Uh, and then we are confirming that there was no surprises that came to our attention. So the objective of an audit is to give a, an opinion on the financial statements. And like Mr. Boyle said, um, this is required by the state of Florida, and the state of Florida has rigid requirements for governmental entities, uh, and what their report has to say, because after the acceptance of the audit report, it has, this report has to go to the auditor general's office and they do a desk review. And if there's anything missing or anything they're questioning, uh, they would contact us back. So part of the, what we have to look at is the financial statements given opinion. We have give, issued an unmodified opinion on the financial statements, a clean opinion. Uh, we have to, uh, have professional judgment and skepticism. We have to look at the risk and material misstatement and, uh, the financial health of the district. Um, we are happy to say that there were no internal control compliance matters that came to our attention. Uh, we also have to look at your investments. You have an investment policy, you have investment committees. We are required to ensure that you're following your policy, that it's in accordance with the Florida statutes. We also have to look to see that, um, your, uh, finance key financial individuals have continuing education with investments. And so they have to show proof of that too. So there's a lot of regulations that go with government, and it's all about, uh, making sure that, uh, the citizens' funds are properly, um, uh, you know, to oversight is being made. Uh, and because you are a special district of the state of Florida, uh, you also have to be even more transparent. And report includes information as to what were the special assessments that were charged, how much you have in bonds outstanding, uh, and if you have any construction projects with value of 65,000 or greater. And so that's all that information is, is in your audit report. Uh, again, there were no issues that came to our attention. Some key financial observations. There were no new capital additions this year. Uh, your investment earnings, uh, were not, uh, as, um, uh, robust as last year, but they did come in greater than budget. And you did, uh, adhere to your reserve policy that you're setting aside monies, uh, for any future emergencies or future major capital repairs. So you're following your policy there. And we believe that most importantly, your your budget to actual statement that is in this audit report, uh, you know that, um, the budget season starts up pretty soon and you all adopt a budget, and that's where your controls come in place where you say, you know, this is what we expect to get in, um, assessments, and this is what we need to spend and what it's gonna cost to run the, um, maintenance of the district. And this particular year, you'll see that you budgeted for a loss, uh, how, because of the fact that you wanted to spend down some excess reserves. And you'll see that here in the report. The first column is the original budget. The second column is the amended budget, and then what your year to date actual was. And most importantly, you came under budget with your expenses that you had budgeted to spend 4.2 million and only needed to spend a little over 4 million. So you, uh, kept your expenditures under control and, uh, you're able to do that because of you have a budget department, you have, um, financial information that's given to you monthly so that you can, uh, see what's going on with your budget, uh, on a monthly basis. So those are some of the key highlights with the audit. Um, this is just a good scenario that shows that, you know, to, to have a good audit report and have it produced timely and sent to the state timely. We work with management, uh, and the governing board and, uh, all this working together, we are able to conclude the audit process. So I'd like to thank, uh, the board for having us present today. Thank you. Thank you. Uh, I would also like to mention thank you for recognizing our staff. I know that is a really, really difficult job that they have to do in this. Yes. And every year they do it beautifully, as does your mm-hmm. Uh, firm. So thank you for all what you do also. Thank You. Appreciate that. Any questions from our supervisors regarding the audit report? And I know we've been through it in numerous amount of times. Walter, one, one question. Um, do you make recommendations on the percent of our reserve, be it up or down, or is that something that's done internally by, uh, our accounting department? I'm just concerned sometimes if we have too much reserve, if we should spend down some of the reserve be a little more liberal on the amount of reserve mm-hmm. That we carry rather than having an excess. Correct. So you management has put together a policy and the board has approved that policy, and we'd look to see if you are adhering to that policy and, and you did. Uh, and I believe that you all budgeted to spend down some of that. So you'll see there that there was about $800,000 that was spent down. Uh, and so, you know, just look at it on an annual basis and see if spending it down was the right move. So that's not in your purview. You don't make recommendations. We think you're carrying too high of a reserve percentage, Uh, correct. That's, that's more of a management decision. Yes. Yeah. Over the years, we have obviously strived to keep our special assessments down for our residents. Mm-hmm. So we have not raised them in, I think what, Gary, 16 years, something like that. It's been a long time that we've lowered them numerous times. Mm-hmm. Uh, one of the concerns was were we budgeting enough in our reserves to be able to continue that? And I think we came to the determination and we may not be able to continue doing that based on the reserves. So we increased the amount. I believe Jerry made that, uh, motion. So we put more away this jury, uh, that then would suffice. At this point, you think that, that our decision to increase the reserves was sufficient from what you see For the, for the 26th fiscal year. Mm-hmm. Yes. Well, of course we have not looked at that yet. We've looked at your financial information through November. Mm-hmm. Uh, because we're required to do what we call a subsequent event to make sure nothing material has happened. So we'll have to wait till the end of the year to see the results of operation. Mm-hmm. Uh, but you'll be able to see those monthly financial reports. I believe it's in your, your Board package. Well, that was a pretty good idea in advance then, whether we put a sufficient amount away, probably halfway through the year, I would think. Yes. And what's most important also is your, is your five year capital future capital outlay budget. That's where the large expenditures will come in for, you know, repairs and maintenance mill and overlay to the roads repair fencing, that's where your big capital items are. And you have that money set aside and committed at the current time, and you didn't spend anything this year in that. Mm-hmm. Uh, and then, so we, we ensure that when you do spend, uh, for committed funds, that you use just that pot of money, so to speak, uh, and that you're not using general operations. Okay. And Mr. Chairman, I have question. Yes, sir. Is either generally accepted principles, accounting principles, or does, does the state make recommendations or have guidelines regarding the amount of reserve you have, say, as a percentage of, or compared to the value of your infrastructure? Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Um, so that, you know, we have a certain responsibility for the, for the amount of infrastructure that we have within this district, and it has a value to it. Yes. And then, uh, and the cost to replace that has a value, and it, it, obviously it goes up from year to year because of inflation and other mm-hmm. Uh, circumstances. But is there some sort of a guideline that we need to have, or is it in place already that says, based upon the value you should have a oh, 27% or 50%, whatever that number may be, that, that we can use to guide us in our budgetary process? Uh, there's no official guidance on that. Uh, the GFOA Government Finance Officers Association does have a recommendation for your district general expenditures to have in fund balance 25% of your annual budget. But as far as future capital outlay costs, you can see how that is such a moving target. And it would be very expensive to have, you know, look at the cost of your road replacement. So there's no official guidance. That is something that, you know, you as a board and with your management team would have to decide as to what you could afford, uh, for the future. So that's your capital outlay. But no, there's no written, uh, recommendation except for general operating expenses. Thank you. Thank you. Any other questions? No, thank you. Obviously, with the extent of our budget, we need to have a motion to accept it. So at this point, if there are no further questions, anything from the audience on this, okay. Then I would, uh, entertain a motion to accept. I'll make, I'll make a motion to accept the, uh, audit report as presented. Okay. Second. Okay. Any other further questions? It has been moved and seconded to accept the budget as stated. All those in favor please signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Okay. It is unanimous. Thank you very much, and very nice job on behalf of our finance department. Thank you. Okay. Next item on the agenda, public hearings. We have two public hearings listed on here, and I think we'll be getting an update from Ms. Shannon. Good morning. Good morning. How are you? Good. Um, yes, there will be two public hearings this morning. Okay. Okay. Yes, sir. Before we get started, a quick overview of the public hearing process. Yep. In public hearings, the board access both the judge and jury. In that capacity, the board will consider evidence, make findings of fact, and draw conclusions of law. During the hearing, the board may only receive evidence from the property owner, district staff, and those that will be substantially and directly affected by the outcome of the board's decision. At the conclusion, the public hearing, the board will need to determine whether staff presented competent, substantial evidence to support a finding of the alleged violation. If so, the board must enter an Order of enforcement. Our first case is case number D five dash zero six dash 26. If there's anyone here to testify, if you please stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear affirm that the testimony and evidence you're about to give in the hearing today will be the truth and nothing but the truth? Yes, I do. Okay. This point, we'll temporarily suspend our regular meeting to go into Judic judicial hearing on these Good Morning Board, Shannon Boyd Community Standards. Today I have before you, case number D five dash zero six dash 26 Village Community Development District number five, versus to the estate of Gerald j Stefanski, 2 1 8 6 Broxton Place, unit 83, lot 2 4 1. Violation of the district's rule to bring about deep compliance and specifically the rule that states no vehicles and capable of operations shall be stored on any home site. Nor shall any junk vehicles or equipment be kept on any home site owners shall keep their home sites neat and clean, the grass cut, irrigated and edged at all times. If an owner does not adhere to this regulation, then the work may be performed on behalf of the owner and the cost shall be charged to the owner. As stated in the Village Community Development District number five, external deed restriction standards. Inoperable vehicles are vehicles that are incapable of operation, are not licensed, and or registered or have flat or missing tires. Also, as stated in the external deed restriction standards, maintenance means the exercising reasonable care to keep buildings, landscaping, lighting lawns, and other related improvements in fixtures in good condition. On November 25th, 2025, a complaint was received regarding a broken door, broken windows in an inoperable vehicle in the driveway. Staff verified these violations and also observed weaves and a dirt weaves in a dirty driveway and walkway. A deed restriction reminder was written on November 26th, and the initial and second letters were sent out on December 9th. In December 22nd. And after following the procedures of external deed restriction, a notice of public hearing was sent by regular and certified mail On January 12th, the homeowner is deceased. The homeowner's daughter was residing in the home, but is currently incarcerated. Staff have contacted Freedom Mortgage via telephone to inform them of the violations. Staff also forwarded copies of all the letters and photographs that were taken to Freedom Mortgage. During an inspection of the property on February 8th, it was determined that the property does remain out of compliance. Now currently due to a phase two water shortage restriction, which became effective February 8th through July 1st, staff had temporarily suspending enforcement of pressure washing requirements until the drought order has been lifted. So this order of enforcement will not pertain to the dirty driveway and walkway. So staff's recommendation would be to find the owner in violation of the District deed compliance rule. As cited by the deed compliance staff, the owner has seven days to remove the weeds from the property to bring that portion of the property into compliance. If the weeds have been removed and that portion of the property has been brought into compliance within seven days of the order of enforcement, that portion of case number D five dash zero six dash 26 shall be closed. If the weeds have not been removed within seven days of the Order of enforcement, authorize the district to maintain the property, I impose a minimum of a $250 fine. Or the actual cost of maintenance, whichever is more to be paid within 10 days of the invoice. Authorize a district to maintain the property twice a month in the summer and once a month in the winter as needed, and impose a $250 fine each time the district maintains the property. If the owner prohibits a district from maintaining the property, then the owner shall be fined an initial amount of $150 and an additional $50 per day until the property is brought into compliance. The owner has five days to remove the inoperable vehicle or place a valid registration sticker on the vehicle to bring that portion of the property into compliance. If the inoperable vehicle has been removed, or a valid registration sticker has been placed on the vehicle to bring that portion of the property into compliance within five days of the order of enforcement, that portion of case number D five dash zero six dash 26 shall be closed. If the inoperable vehicle has not been removed, or a valid registration sticker has not been placed on the vehicle within five days over the order of enforcement, impose $150 fine to be paid within 10 days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until the property is brought into compliance. The owner has 30 days to repair or replace the broken windows, the torn lanai screen, the broken screen door, and the damaged siding on the lanai. If the Windows Lanai screen screen door and the siding on the lanai have all been repaired or replaced within 30 days of the order of Enforcement, that portion of case number D five dash zero six dash 26 shall be closed. If the broken windows torn lanai screens broken screen door and damaged siding on the lanai have not been repaired or replaced within 30 days of the Order of enforcement, impose $150 fine to be paid within 10 days of the invoice and impose a $50 daily fine until that portion of the property has been brought into compliance. If the weeds have been removed, the inoperable vehicle has been removed, or a valid registration sticker has been placed on the vehicle. And if the broken windows torn LAN ice screen, broken screen door, and the damaged siding on Lanai have all been repaired or replaced within the time timeframe specified herein, case number D five dash zero six dash 26 shall be closed. If the property is not brought into compliance as required, hearing staff shall record this Order of enforcement Kali in the public records of Sumter County, Florida. It is a property owner's responsibility to contact the Community Standards Department to request a deed compliance officer revisit the property to confirm compliance. If the fines reach $1,500, the case shall be turne