COUNCIL ZONING MEETING

>> OKAY LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WELCOME TO THE CITY OF DORAL, COUNSEL CITY MEETING ZONING. IT IS, 6: 08 P M. MADAM, CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLE. >> CALLING ROLE. >> "I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL" >> LOST AUDIO, STAND BY. >> THE LORD WILL REWARD THEM. AND THE MOST HIGH WILL PROTECT THEM. HE WILL GIVE THEM ROYAL S P L E N D O R, AND A MAGNIFICENT CROWN. HE WILL GO OUT INTO BATTLE, DETERMINED TO DEFEAT HIS ENEMIES, AND USE THE CREATION ITSELF AS A WEAPON. RIGHTEOUSNESS WILL BE HIS ARMOR. GENUINE JUSTICE WILL BE HIS HELMET. WILL BE HIS SHIELD. WHO ARE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO OPPOSE HIM, THE WORD OF GOD. >> THANK YOU LORD FOR THIS GOOD AFTERNOON THAT YOU LET US BE TOGETHER, GATHERED TO DO OUR BEST IN OUR HEART, AND OUR BEST WORK. AMEN. >> AMEN. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH [INAUDIBLE] AND THANK YOU FOR BEING IN DORAL, YOU HAVE BEEN HERE EVEN BEFORE WE WERE A CITY, SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> OKAY. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, ANYTHING ON THE AGENDA, ORDER OF BUSINESS? NOTHING? OKAY. WELL, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN WELCOME, IF YOU'RE HERE FOR THE FIRST TIME, IF YOU'RE HERE FOR MORE THAN THAT, WELCOME BACK. JUST A COUPLE OF RULES, TODAY WE HAVE A COUNSEL ZONING MEETING. SO WE WILL HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS, WHERE YOU CAN COMMENT ON ANYTHING THAT YOU WANT. AFTER WE GO TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT POTION, THE YOUNG LADY TO THE LEFT WILL BE SPEAKING ON ANY OF THE ITEMS THAT ARE ZONING ITEMS, AND SHELL ASK YOU TO SAY THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, AND THAT WILL HAPPEN AFTER -- YOU SUPPORT AN ITEM, BLUE, YOU OPPOSE IT, AND IF YOU CAN FILL IT OUT AND GIVE IT TO ONE OF THE YOUNG LADIES TO THE LEFT. VERY FEW RULES AND VERY SIMPLE. NUMBER ONE, YOU CAN, UM, SPEAK, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO TELL US WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE ITEM, NOT A BUZZER GOES OFF, AND I'LL ASK YOU TO WRAP IT UP. AND HOPEFULLY, YOU CAN TELL US YOUR OPINION WITHIN THAT TIME PERIOD. NUMBER TWO, IF YOU'RE GOING TO USE A CELL PHONE, PLEASE STEP OUTSIDE. IT'S HARD TO HEAR SOMETIMES. NUMBER THREE, YOU CAN CRITICIZE ANYBODY THAT YOU WANT, MYSELF, THE COUNSEL, THE ADMINISTRATION. YOUR NEIGHBOR, YOUR HUSBAND OR YOUR WIFE INCLUDED, YOU HAVE TO DO IT RESPECTFULLY, IF NOT, SOMEONE WILL ASK YOU TO STEP OUTSIDE, THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED, AND WE HOPE THAT IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY. THOSE ARE THE BASIC RULES, OBVIOUSLY, WE HAVE SOME PEOPLE THAT DON'T SPEAK ENGLISH, WE HAVE TRANSLATORS. EVEN THOUGH I UNDERSTAND YOU, IT HAS TO BE IN ENGLISH. LOST AUDIO: >> GENERAL COMMENTS ABOUT ZONING, AS USUAL, THERE ARE SOME ZONING CHANGES BEING REQUESTED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF -- TWO OR THREE, LLC'S, LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATIONS. AS YOU KNOW, WHEN AN LLC IS COMPRISED AND SOME PLACES LIKE IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE TO D E V U L G E, THE PRINCIPALS OF LLC. WHEN IT'S IN FLORIDA, I'M NOT SURE IF THE PRINCIPALS HAVE TO BE D E V U L G E, AND THE REPRESENTATIVES THAT ARE ALWAYS ATTORNEYS, I LOOKED ONLINE AT SOME OF THE REQUESTS, AND I SAW ONE SIGNATURE BY ONE ATTORNEY, AND ANOTHER SIGNATURE BY ANOTHER GUY, AND I DON'T KNOW IF HE WAS AN ATTORNEY, AND THE POINT THAT I'M TRYING TO MAKE HERE -- IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I'M MAKING UP, AND SUPPOSEDLY, THE CITY IS TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE KNOW WHO'S COMPROMISES THE LLC'S BEFORE WE LET THEM OPEN A BUSINESS HERE. SO ORDINANCE WAS PASSED IN THAT REGARD BUT UM, UNLESS WE'RE GOING TO BE SURE, UM, WHO'S BEHIND THE LLCS FOR ALL WE KNOW IT CAN BE A -- YOU KNOW, M A D U R O AND HIS GANG OR THESE PEOPLE FROM NORTH KOREA OR CHINA OR IRAN, YOU I MEAN, MONEY HAS A WAY OF GETTING INTO OUR SYSTEM. AND IF WE'RE NOT CAREFUL, WE'RE NOT ONLY GOING TO LOSE OUR FREEDOM, BUT WE'RE GOING TO LOSE THE BEAUTIFUL ENVIRONMENT THAT WE HAVE HERE IN FLORIDA BECAUSE EVERY TIME THESE GUYS WANT A ZONING CHANGE IT'S USUALLY TO DO THINGS LIKE THEY WANT HERE, IN SOME OF THESE LIKE MIXED USE ZONING, OR UPGRADE THE ZONING THAT THEY HAVE TO A HIGHER DENSITY OF ZONING THAT THEY HAVE. THEY NEVER COME IN TO SAY, GEE, WE WANT TO RIP DOWN THIS BUILDING AND PUT A FARM, IS THAT OKAY? NO THEY NEVER SAY THAT. THEY DON'T WANT TO PUT UP AN, AQUARIUM CENTER, AND HAVE PONY RIDES, THEY DON'T DO THAT, THEY ONLY WANT TO BUILD AND BUILD -- LOST AUDIO. >> OKAY. NO ONE ELSE HAS CHOSEN TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME. WE NOW GO TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO MADAM CLERK. >> GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE IF YOU ARE PRESENTING ANY TESTIMONY, OR ON THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS, PLEASE STAND UP AND REPEAT AFTER ME. I DO SOLEMNLY STATE OR AFFIRM. THAT THE TESTIMONY I'M GOING TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. FIRST ITEM: 6 A. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DORAL, FLORIDA, APPROVING/DENYING THE SITE PLAN FOR DISTRICT 79 LOCATED NORTH OF NW 41 STREET AND BETWEEN 79 AVENUE AND STATE ROAD 826/PALMETTO EXPRESSWAY, DORAL, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE >> PUBLIC PORTION IS CLOSED. >> YES, SIR, GOOD EVENING, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNSEL. OUR ACTING MEMBER IS PRESENT WHO WILL MAKE THE PRESENTATION. >> THE WAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS IS STAFF WILL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AND PRESENTATION: WE WILL THEN HAVE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEM. AND THEN WE WILL HAVE THE OPTION OF APPROVE DENY OR DEFER. THAT INCLUDES YOU MR. PRICE. COME ON UP. >> GOOD EVENING MAYOR, COUNSEL MEMBERS, COMMISSION MANAGER. MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE, MY NAME IS J A V I E R, (NO AUDIBLE RESPONSE.) THEY WERE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND BOOK AGREEMENTS, SO THIS ITEM WOULD APPROVE THE CITE PLAN SO THAT THEY CAN PROCEED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. AND THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT, UM, NORTH 44TH STREET. THE CITE PLAN IS FOR APPROVAL OF 4 HUNDRED THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF INDUSTRIAL USES, AND 50 THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USES, THIS IS THE LOCATION MAP LIKE YOU HAVE SEEN MANY TIMES BEFORE. 5.5 PERCENT OF HARD SCAPE, WHICH IS THE COLOR PAVER THAT YOU SEE ALONG THE 79TH AVENUE FOR RETAIL AND THE RESTAURANTS AND PEDESTRIANS. THE CIRCULATION, WILL BE ACCESSED THROUGH 79TH AVENUE. AND INCORPORATE PUBLIC SITTING AREAS. AT THIS TIME STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. >> APPROVED. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> ANYTHING THAT THE APPLICANT WANTS TO ADD AND OR SAY? >> I DROVE ALL THE WAY HERE, SO AT LEAST I CAN SAY MY NAME, TRACEY -- I WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR HELPING US WITH THIS PROCESS, IT WAS A LENGTHY ONE, AND WE WORKED REALLY HARD, AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT HE HAS DONE A GREAT JOB. SO THANK YOU. >> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR QUERIES? >> COUNSELMAN, CABRERA? >> CABRAL? >> YES. >> BERMUDEZ? >> YES. >> *FRAGA? >> YES. >> 6 B: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE >> THE PUBLIC COUNTY /POERGTS OF THIS ITEM IS UP FOR THIS TIME. CAN YOU GIVE US YOUR OPINION. >> HELLO, 52ND LANE. BEAUTIFUL DORAL. MR. COUNSEL AND MEMBERS AND MAYOR. AND AUDIENCE. I KINDLY REQUEST TO HOLD MY TIME AFTER THE STAFF MAKES THEIR STATEMENT. IF YOU ALLOW ME TO DO SO. >> NORMALLY, I WOULD NOT. I ASK THAT IN THE FUTURE, IF THE QUESTIONS ARE VERY SPECIFIC TO SOMETHING THAT THEY BRING UP, I'M GOING TO MAKE A RARE EXCEPTION THIS TIME, AND GIVE YOU TWO MINUTES MAX. >> THE RESERVE TIME AS A REBUTTAL. >> BUT HE'S THE APPLICANT. >> I'M THE TAX PAYER. >> BUT THERE ARE RULES, IF THE RULES ARE NOT FOLLOWED -- >> I'M A TAX PAYER TOO, AND I HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES TOO. >> WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FIRST FROM THE STAFF AND THEN THE APPLICANT. >> MAYOR, THIS ITEM IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PERMIT THE SALE OF ALCOHOL IT WAS DEFERRED FROM THE AUGUST 28TH MEETING, SINCE THEN, WE MET WITH THE APPLICANT AND WE MET DURING A HEARING, AND NOW WALKING TO THEM, AND THIS IS LAID OUT OF THE FLOOR PLAN, OF THE ESTABLISHMENT, AND LOCATED AT THE CITY PLACE, AND THE EXACT ADDRESS IS, 3535 NORTH WEST, 83RD AVENUE. SWEET, 125. THIS IS THE AREAL MAP OF THE CITY PLACE. THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN WHICH WE WENT OVER DURING THE FIRST HEARING. AND THE TWO WERE MODIFIED AND ONE WAS INCLUDE ODD THERE. AND I THINK THAT WOULD ADDRESS YOUR CONCERN AND THE COUNSEL MEMBERS CONCERN I WILL WALK YOU THROUGH THEM VERY BRIEFLY, NUMBER FOUR, WE LIMITED THE AMOUNT OF SALES THAT THEY CAN HAVE FOR BEER AND WINE, WE C A P T IT AT 45 PERCENT. SO IF YOU WANT TO INSPECT ANY GIVEN TIME, WE CAN GO TO THE ESTABLISHMENT, AND ABIDE BY THIS CONDITION. WE MODIFY THAT CONDITION, TO BE FOR THE SALON OWNERS, AND GUESTS, AND NO ONE ELSE. AND IT'S A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE ESTABLISHMENT, TO THE ZONING, DEMONSTRATING THE COMPLIANCE TO THE CONDITION. WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THE RESOLUTION. AT THIS TIME, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONS. WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO THANK STAFF FOR WORKING WITH US, FROM THE ISSUES THAT WE MET LAST TIME, WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO BACK AND CHECK WITH THE APPLICANT, AND MAKE SURE WHAT PERCENTAGE IS FAIR AND REASONABLE FOR THEM TO COMPLY WITH, AND WE AGREE WITH ALL OF THE STAFF CONDITIONS. >> I DO HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> BEFORE WE VOTE THE MOTION TO APPROVE. DO YOU HAVE THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE BEEN RESERVED. >> MY ONLY POINT AND THANKS FOR THE UPDATES, IT'S THE 25 PERCENT INCOME OF EACH INDIVIDUAL RECEIPT LIKE THE RESTAURANTS ARE FORCED TO. ON THE CONSUMPTION OF TIPSY AND CONVERT THE SALON INTO AN S A L O O N. SO A SALON OR AN S A L O O N. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS SPECIAL CONCESSION. >> SPECIAL, ONE TIME. WE'RE DONE WITH ANY SPECIAL CONCESSIONS. >> I PLACE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> THAT'S ONE OF MY CONCERNS, I'M ALSO SUPPORTING IT, BECAUSE IT'S IN A D M U, I'M GOING TO ASK STAFF, AND I ALREADY EXPRESSED THIS TO THE MANAGER, BECAUSE WE COME UP WITH A CODE TO ADDRESS THE MIXING, AND THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION. I DON'T THINK THAT IT'S AN APPROPRIATE AT AND JUST ANY SCENARIO. ESPECIALLY CITY PLACES HERE RAN OTHER AREAS, PROPONED AREA, SO IF SOMEONE IS THERE IT'S MORE CONDUCIVE TO THAT ENVIRONMENT. BUT ALSO OUTSIDE OF THAT ENVIRONMENT, I DON'T WANT TO SEE EVERY SALON IN DORAL WHICH IS A WHOLE BUNCH OF THEM IN A WHOLE PLACE, THEY ARE SERVING A FREE GLASS OF CHAMPAGNE, I'M NOT IN ENFORCEMENT, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CODE COMPLIANCE IS. BECAUSE IT'S ALCOHOL. IT'S NOT LEGAL, IT'S NOT LEGAL, THEY SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT, BUT THAT'S A DIFFERENT SUBJECT. I'LL BE IN SUPPORT OF IT. BUT I'M ASKING STAFF TO COME BACK, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, TO ALLOW THIS TYPE OF SITUATION AND D M YOU -- C M U, MIXED TYPE PRACTICES. >> ANY QUESTIONS? >> I WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I EXPRESS MYSELF TO -- >> WITH THEM TO REVIEW THE AGENDA, AND UM, AT THAT TIME, WE CAME UP WITH THE POINT NUMBER TEN, THAT I THINK THAT ALSO -- THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE CODE, AND UM, SO THOSE ARE JUST MY COMMENTS. >> JUST ONE QUICK QUESTION, YOU'RE RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL WITH HOW MANY -- IT'S 11. >> ALL RIGHT. >> MY SUBJECT TO APPROVE IS BASED ON THE CONDITIONS JUST FOR CLARIFICATIONS. >> AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE BASED ON SUBJECT TO -- >> MOTION TO APPROVE. MADE BY COUNSELMAN, CABRERA? >> CALL ROLE. >> ALL YES. MOTION PASSES. >> WE MAY HAVE THE MOST AN APPROPRIATE AT BUSINESS IN DORAL. >> AMENDMENT >> 6 C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL EFFECTIVE DATE >> IF YOU ALLOW ME PLEASE, I WOULD LIKE TO DEMONSTRATE TO YOU HOW MANY ARE HERE. SPEAKING SPANISH: STAND BY. >> SO WE HAVE A GOOD PRESENCE HERE. I JUST WANT TO PUT IT IN A NUTSHELL. WE HAVE MANY CONCERNS, IN THE PAST, SO THE CORE ISSUES ARE STILL LINGERING. SO THIS HEARING ALTHOUGH IT'S NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO WHAT WE HAVE SUFFERED OR GONE ON FOR MANY MONTHS AND YEARS, WE JUST WANT TO SAY THAT IN STATE, WE HAVE A VOICE AND THAT WE WANT TO PAR TAKE, AND A PART OF THIS PROCESS, BECAUSE AGAIN, ONE OF THE MAIN CONCERNS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A LACK OF OR AN ABSENCE OF AMENITIES. SO NOW WE'RE APPEALING TO YOU, MAYOR, COUNSEL MEMBERS, LET'S MAKE THOSE WHO ARE -- -- >> LOST AUDIO. >> IT MIGHT BE AMENDMENTS AHEAD, SO WE WANT AND WE REQUESTED YOUR SUPPORT. TO BECOME PARTNERS WITH US. WE WANT YOU TO WALK THIS PROCESS. WE DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO MAKE OR REPEAT THE SAME IN THE PAST. WE'RE REPEATING THIS -- THOSE WHO ARE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THIS. PROPOSAL OR AMENDMENTS, OR VERBALLY WE HAVE CONSIDERED AND BE DILIGENT IN PROVIDING WHAT YOU GUYS ARE LACKING RIGHT NOW. SO WE CAN THEN YOU KNOW -- MAKE SURE THAT YOUR PROPERTY VALUE IS NOT EVALUATED, AND DOES NOT CONTINUE TO BE ON DECLINED, AND THAT'S SOMETHING TO BE SHARED WITH THE CITY OF DORAL. THAT WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING GOING FORWARD AND WE'RE OPEN AND WILLING TO COLLABORATE WITH WHATEVER EFFORTS ARE DOING. I THINK THAT THE COMMON THING, THE CORE SHOULD BE, HEY, HOW CAN WE MAKE OUR COMMUNITY BETTER. ALL RIGHT, AND I THINK THAT WE NEED TO HAVE A COMPROMISE, AND I REALLY DO APPRECIATE, AND I THANK YOU -- SEEING MY FACE, THANK YOU, ESPECIALLY. >> ANYBODY ELSE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME? >> OKAY. THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS CLOSED. WHY DON'T YOU GO AHEAD AND DO THE X PARTY THING. >> OR WE CAN JUST LET THEM KNOW, WE'RE ACTUALLY GETTING INTO A LOT OF DETAILS, AND TELLING ME -- THERE'S A LOT OF SETTLEMENT, IN THE PARTNERS, AND SETTING UP NEW PHASES, AND WE DIDN'T GET INTO ANY DISCUSSIONS, BUT THEY JUST TOLD US THAT WE'RE GOING FORWARD. AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT YOU ARE TAKING CONSIDERATION ON THE -- YES, I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THE APPLICANT AND UM, JUST TO UPDATE ON WHAT THE PROJECT IS -- AND COMING ON FOR THE VOTE, BUT IT DOESN'T AFFECT MY VOTE IN ANY WAY. >> SO THE APPLICANT AND THE RESIDENTS HAVE BOTH SPOKEN FOR THE MEETING. BEFORE THE MEETING, AND THAT ALSO INCLUDES X PARTY COMMUNICATIONS, AND THEY WON'T IMPACT THE WAY THAT I VOTE TODAY. >> I ONLY HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH THE RESIDENTS BEFORE THE MEETING. AND IT WON'T IMPACT MY MEETING. >> MADAM CLERK, AT THIS POINT WE WANT TO MOVE FORWARD. OKAY. STAFF YOU'LL GO FIRST, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT, AND FIGURE THIS OUT. >> YES, MAYOR, I HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION, AND I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT. >> VERY BRIEFLY --. THE APPLICANT IS 107 DORAL. >> COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. 75 THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. OF OFFICE SPACE, AND 73 SQUARE FEET OF CLUBHOUSE. AND AGAIN, THE, THE, PHASING OF THE PROJECT WILL GO FROM 3 PHASES TO NOW 6. >> LOST AUDIO. WHO CAN CONSIST OF 127 DWELLING UNITS. PHASE SIX, NO RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 52000, SQUARE FEET. A COUPLE OF ISSUES THAT I WANT TO DISCUSS TONIGHT. THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO DISCUSS. AND THAT ARE OF GREAT INTEREST TO YOUR RESIDENTS. I PREPARED A BRIEF PRESENTATION. I'LL GO THROUGH IT, TO GO THROUGH A BRIEF OF THE CONTEXT AND GUESS WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU FIRST, AND FOREMOST THE IS THAT THIS APPLICATION, BEFORE YOU DOES NOT SEEM TO INCREASE THE INTENSITY TO SEEK TO CHANGE THE DESIGN OF ANY OF THE PHASES. IT'S JUST A REALLOCATION. SPECIAL INTERESTS AND CONCERNS NOT JUST TO THE RESIDENTS BUT TO THE PRINCIPALS. WE HAVE NOT REACHED, 150 MARK. WHERE THE CLUBHOUSE PLANNING WILL BEGIN. HOWEVER, AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE SLIDE, THAT'S WHY I KEPT THIS ONE UP. AT THE CLUBHOUSE, IT WILL GO ON THE SECOND PHASE OF THE PROJECT, SO THE NEXT BUILDING UM, BUILDING FIVE, AND THAT BUILDING WILL CONTAIN, THE CLUBHOUSE, AS WELL AS OTHER USERS, I SPOKE TO MR. [INAUDIBLE], HE ANTICIPATES THE CONSTRUCTION OF THAT BUILDING THAT PHASE WILL BEGIN MID TO LATE NEXT YEAR. SO THAT CLUBHOUSE WILL BE SOON ENOUGH, NOT AS SOON AS I WANT IT, BUT IS THAT CLUBHOUSE WILL BE IN THE NEXT PHASE. AT ONE POINT IT WAS A -- LOST AUDIO: >> SO PARKING IS ONE OF YOUR CONCERNS, IF I'M CORRECT? >> IT IS, IT IS ONE THAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY IT WENT FROM BEING AN AMENITY TO A HARDSHIP FOR THE RESIDENTS, THE OTHER PART IS A CLUBHOUSE SITUATION? >> YES, THE CLUBHOUSE, THAT'S COMPOUNDING THE ABSENCE OF AMENITIES. >> IS THERE ANY OTHER AMENITIES? >> TO ENFORCE -- LOST AUDIO. >> WE AGREE WITH THE CODE AND ALL OF THAT -- LOST AUDIO. I DON'T THINK TO MY KNOWLEDGE EVEN IF THE 550 MARK, I'M NOT SURE IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT WE DO ABOUT IT. I'M NOT SURE THAT THE CITY CAN CLARIFY THAT. WE JUST HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT VIOLATION -- YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE OF THAT MASTER AGREEMENT. LOST AUDIO. >> -- THE NATURE, THE NEW ONE. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT -- >> PLACE PARK. >> WHEN THIS PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED, IT WAS APPROVED FOR 3 THOUSAND UNITS, SO THE DENSITY IS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THAN WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED. WASN'T IT 15 TO 13 UNITS? >> YES, IT WAS LESS ACREAGE AND MORE UNITS. >> THE COUNTY PROVIDED WAS 12 THOUSAND UNITS. WE WENT TO COURT FOR THE WHOLE AREA. SO YOUR CLIENT, AND OUR ATTORNEY CAME BACK TO THE COUNSEL WITH AN AGREEMENT THAT CAPPED IT AT A MAXIMUM FOR FOUR THOUSAND UNITS. >> WE CAPPED IT TO ABOUT A THIRD TO WHAT THE COUNTY WAS PERMITTED. >> NOW, AS FAR AS THE PARKING IS CONCERN, I WILL, UM, CONFESS ME PERSONALLY THAT I WAS INVOLVED WHEN WE CHANGED THE CODE FOR PARKING IN MIXED USE PROJECTS AND ONE OF THE THINGS AFTER BEING HERE FOR SO MANY YEARS, YOU GET ALL OF THESE ENGINEERING STUDIES, THEY LOOK GREAT ON PAPER, AND I'M A VERY LOGICAL PERSON. MY BUILDING HAS NO PARKING EITHER. IT GETS EXPENSIVE. BECAUSE THEY HAVE VALET. IT GETS COMPLICATED LOST AUDIO. THEY LOWERED THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. LIKE I DO, I WALKED DOWN TO EAT, I DON'T DRIVE SO IT'S THAT MIX USE OF THAT AREA. SO WE DID APPROVE SOMETHING UNDER THAT THEORY. >> UNFORTUNATELY THOUGH, WHATEVER HAS BEEN AGREED TO IT ALREADY, WE CANNOT GO BACK AND -- LOST AUDIO. BUT THEN AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THE ONLY GUARANTEE IN LIFE IS DEATH, IRONICALLY ENOUGH. >> AND TAXES TOO. >> AND I KNOW THAT IT'S PROBABLY OWE I'M NOT A LAWYER, OR AN ATTORNEY, I DO RESPECT THE PROFESSION, BUT THERE HAS TO BE SOME FEASIBILITY -- SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO, WHATEVER THE CITY CAN DO, I THINK THAT WE SHOULD DO. >> IT SOUNDS LIKE IT'S GOING INTO THE CONTRACT. AND IF IT'S IN THE CONTRACT, AND WITH US, WE HAVE A LOT OF TEETH. IT CAN GET REALLY UGLY IF -- OTHERWISE, EVERYTHING STOPS. WE HAVE THE POWER TO STOP EVERYTHING. AND WITHOUT GOING TO COURT. AND THEY HAVE TO TAKE US TO COURT, SO HOPEFULLY THE CITY ATTORNEYS ARE AWARE OF IT NOW. AND WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT IT GETS INTO THE CONTRACT WITH YOU ALL, AND WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO HELP YOU AS A CITY. I'M HAPPY TO SEE THIS WORKING OUT, SO THANK YOU FOR COMING HERE TONIGHT AND EXPRESSING YOUR CONCERNS. >> THANK YOU. >> I WANT TO SAY THAT ON FRIDAY, WHEN I SIT DOWN TO REVIEW THE AGENDA. THAT'S WHERE I HEARD BEFORE, WHERE THERE'S ISSUES. EVEN THOUGH I HAVE NEVER MET WITH ANY OF YOU. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT I MEET WITH YOU. I SPOKE TO MR. [INAUDIBLE]. EVEN THOUGH BY THE P U D, HE DOESN'T REQUIRE TO MAKE THESE CHANGES, HE WAS RECEPTIVE IN MAKING THE CHANGES OF UM YOUR CONCERN I ALSO WANTED TO THANK J A V I E R, BECAUSE WHEN I ASK HIM FOR A CHART, I WAS ABLE TO COMPARE THAT TO THE P U D REQUIRING. AND THEN WE'RE ABLE TO EXPRESS MY CONCERN TO MR. P E N O. AND ALSO TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND OUR MANAGER AS WELL AND ALSO TO OUR, OUR, UM, CHIEF DEPUTY AS WELL. BECAUSE THEY WERE ABLE TO WORK WITH ME. I EVEN TALK TO HIM SATURDAY, LAST NIGHT, AFTER 8:30 IN THE EVENING, I TALK ALSO WITH HIM, AND I APPRECIATE THAT IT HAS MOVED SO FAST, AND FOR HIM TO COLLABORATE IN ORDER TO FULFILL THE CONCERNS FROM THE RESIDENTS. >> OKAY. >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS? >> COUNSELMAN *FRAGA. >> I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. WHAT IS THE APPROXIMATE TIME LINE? >> YOU MAY SEE THAT IN THE COURSE OF THE HOUSING CRISIS. FLEE OR FOUR ENTITIES THAT ARE GOING TO BE DEVELOPING THE PROJECT, AND EACH WILL DEVELOP IT'S PHASE, IN ACCORDANCE TO THE DOCUMENTS, IF ALL GOES WELL, UM, IT PLANS TO BREAK GROUND NEXT YEAR, SO I THINK THAT YOU'LL SEE DEVELOPMENT MOVE FORWARD VERY VERY QUICKLY. >> THE EXTENSION OR AMENDMENT MADE TO THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT, HOW MANY YEARS IS THAT FOR? >> IT DOESN'T -- IT'S NOT A 163 AGREEMENT. >> SO THERE'S NO TIMETABLE ON IT? >> EXACTLY. >> AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PARKING THAT WAS DISCUSSED, YOU SAID THAT THE ADDITIONAL PARKING THAT YOUR CLIENT IS PROPOSING TO EXTEND TO THE PROJECT ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED, IT WILL BE PER PHASE? >> SO THE PROCESS WILL WORK -- SO WE HAVE -- THERE'S A CONCEPTUAL CITE PLAN, AND A MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND IT WILL PROVIDE THAT FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT PHASE. IT PROVIDES FOR THE DETAILS, WHERE WE REVIEW WITH STAFF -- LOST AUDIO: WAITING FOR AUDIO. STAND BY. >> I'M NOT GOING TO ASK YOU TO START JUNE TENTH. 2020. BUT HAVING GONE THROUGH IT. AND FIGHTING WITH -- I THINK WHAT THE RESIDENTS ARE LOOKING FOR IS A SPECIFIC TIME LINE FOR AN AMENITY THAT IS NOT DELIVERED UPON. I'M NOT ARGUING THAT MR. P E N O OR THEIR PARTNERS. THAT'S THE CONTENTION, BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH THE CONCERN ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS, THE EXPECTATION WILL BE THAT IT WILL INDICATE THE STARTING TIME NO LATER THAN BLANK FOR THIS PARTICULAR A MEN IT'S. >> THAT'S CORRECT. THE WAY THAT IT'S IN THE CLUBHOUSE, IT HAS NOT BEEN TRIGGERED /STKPWHR-FPLT I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT IN THE NEW DOCUMENT, I'M GOING TO CHANGE THAT IN THE NEW DOCKET. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, FOR THE APPLICANT, THE APPLICANT WILL BE WILLING TO PUT NEW LANGUAGE IN IT. TO BEGIN WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COMPANY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WE HAVE THE APPROVAL OR THE OTHER BUILDING TO START IT, CORRECT? >> WE'RE GOING TO COME UP WITH THE NEW TRIGGER. >> AND IT'S NOT GOING TO BE SPECIFIC. >> BUT YOU WANT A NEW TRIGGER DATE. >> AND THAT'S IN THE DOCUMENT. >> LOST AUDIO: >> IF I -- LOT AUDIO. >> DEVELOPING PHASE TWO OR SIX. TO 14 WHAT WAS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION? >> I KNOW THAT THEY VOTED UNANIMOUSLY. WHAT WAS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION? >> I WAS NOT IN ZONING. >> LET'S ASK THE MANAGER. WHAT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF IN 2014? >> I BELIEVE I WASN'T IN PLANNING IN ZONING THE AT THAT TIME. I THINK I WAS IN STAFF COMPLIANCE MUCH THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION WAS FOR APPROVAL. >> OKAY. AND HERE -- THE REASON WHY I ASK YOU IS BECAUSE -- OBVIOUSLY, I DON'T REMEMBER WHO THE DIRECTOR WAS, I'M ASSUMING THAT IT WAS, JULIAN. SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WAS APPROVAL. >> STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AT THE HEARING AND IT WAS APPROVED ON DECEMBER 3RD 2014. >> SO WE'RE TRYING TO UNDUE AS MUCH AS WE CAN, SOMETHING THAT MAY BE WAS -- LET'S CALL IT, NOT AS BENEFICIAL TO THE HOMEOWNERS AT THE TIME; IS THAT CORRECT? >> WE'RE TRYING TO IMPROVE THE SITUATION AS IS IT RELATES TO PARKING AND OBVIOUSLY THE AMENITIES TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S A TIMETABLE FOR THE CLUBHOUSE AND THAT PARKING IS PROVIDED AT A RATE THAT MAKES SENSE AND IT'S COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE. >> I'M FINE WITH THAT. -- >> WHEN WE DID MAYOR ON THE MOVE A WHILE BACK THERE. THE FIRST CONCERN IS OBVIOUSLY THAT SOME OF THE PROMISES THAT WERE MADE. I THINK THAT CHANGING THE PARKING REQUIREMENT GOES A LONG WAY. NUMBER TWO, AS FAR AS THE AMENITIES, THE FACT THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE -- THE LANGUAGE HAS TO HAVE A DROP DATE -- DROP DEAD DATE FOR THIS PROCESS TO START. THE WORSE THING THAT CAN HAPPEN IS THAT THE PARCELS GET SPLIT UP WITH DIFFERENT OWNERS, AND FOR A B C AND D AND THIS PARTICULAR -- LOST AUDIO: ANYTHING THAT INDICATES TO THAT, AND NUMBER THREE IS THAT I DON'T -- IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE DO NOT HAVE THESE PROBLEMS MOVING FORWARD IN THE OTHER FOUR PARCELS, I WAS TRYING TO SAY THE FIVE OTHER PARCELS. AND WE'RE GOING TO PHASE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE AND SIX. WE KNOW THAT PHASE TWO WILL BE MR. -- THE NEXT ONE --; IS THAT CORRECT?? >> LIKELY TO BE. >> BREAKING GROUND NEXT YEAR, AND THAT'S PRETTY FAST, CONSIDERING THAT WE HAVE TO PRODUCE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, APPROVED BY MY STAFF. >> SO NONE OF THE OTHER IN THIS BIFURCATION OF INTERESTS. THEY HAVE PROFITED ANYTHING FOR BUSINESS YET? >> NO, NOT YET. >> OKAY. I MEAN, LOOK YOU KNOW I'M KIND OF GLAD THAT THEY HAD A FIGHT SO THEN WE CAN TRY TO CORRECT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WAS WRONG, IF NOT, WE WON'T BE ABLE TO DO THIS. >> THIS IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THIS. WE'RE TAKING PAUSE FOR THIS. GOING FORWARD. AND SO I WOULD ECHO J A V I E R, AND IMPROVING THE 2008 APPROVAL. >> OKAY. UM, ALL RIGHT YOU ANSWERED MOST OF MY QUESTIONS, AND I GUESS WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY, ARE WE GOING TO HAVE SOMETHING ESTIMATED IS THERE A TIME LINE FOR THE DOCUMENTATION? >> IT WOULD HAVE TO BE FOR THE SECOND READING. >> BY THAT TIME, THAT GIVES COMFORT TO SOME OF THE RESIDENTS THAT THIS STUFF WILL BE IN WRITING TO HAVE SOME RIGHT OF SOME SORT OF STANDING. >> YEAH, I THINK BOTH OF MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED, I THINK IT WILL COME BACK FOR FINAL APPROVAL, AS FAR AS THE RESIDENTS ARE CONCERN I WOULD POSSIBLY GO RECOMMEND THE ASSOCIATION, ONCE IT'S FINALIZED. GOING BACK TO THE PARKING IS BECAUSE, I'M KIND OF CONFUSED. AND AGAIN, THE 2014 MET THE CODE, AND IT WAS A CODE AT THE TIME, AND I WAS HERE, I THOUGHT IT MADE SENSE. FOR ME IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. FOR SOME AREAS, WE DON'T HAVE A CHOICE TO FIX IT. BUT WE DO, HERE, MR. MANAGER, WE LOOK FORWARD TO CHANGING IT TO THE FUTURE, BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MEET THE NEEDS, AT LEAST FOR DORAL IT DOESN'T. MAYBE FOR THE DRIVING PATTERNS, WE DON'T HAVE THE TRANSIT OUT IN THIS AREA. SO PEOPLE NEED CARS AND SO ON. SO YOU SAY THAT TO THE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE AT PARKING. 136 SPOTS, BECAUSE THE PARKING SPOTS -- THE GARAGES ARE THERE. AND I WAS THINKING; OKAY, I GOT CONFUSED, BECAUSE I'M THINKING THAT 136 PARKING SPACES. WHAT ARE THEY BEING USED FOR NOW? >> YOU KNOW, WE HAD -- I'LL TELL YOU -- THE PARKING SPACES, ONE UNIT, 8 PARKING SPACES. LOST AUDIO. -- STAND BY. AND I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, SIMILAR TO HEAR, CURRENTLY THE FIRST FLOOR IS RETAIL AND THERE'S A GATE TO GO UP, AND RESIDENTS GO FROM THAT POINT FORWARD, AND THAT'S A RESULT FROM THAT. AND IF YOU'RE ALLOCATING 136 SPOTS, THAT ARE CURRENTLY USED BY OWNER RESIDENTS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU BUY THEM THERE. DEPENDING ON THE UNIT. UM, SO, THESE ARE 136 SPOTS NOT BEING USED, AND NOBODY'S IN ACCESS TO THEM. -- FOR MORE RETAIL AND MORE -- >> THE FIRST RETAIL IS A LARGE RETAIL. >> I CAN'T GO PASSED THE FIRST FLOOR, OR THE SECOND FLOOR. YOU CAN'T GO TO THE SECOND FLOOR? >> FROM THREE TO SIX. IT'S PARKING FOR RESIDENTS. NOSE LEVELS, WILL HAVE DESIGNATED GUEST SPACES. >> BUT YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO ALLOCATE IT. >> TO HAVE THE CONTROL, AND REGULATE THE PARKING SPACES, LET ME GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT I MEAN. IT WILL REQUIRE 503 A U D PARKING SPACES AND IN ONE OF THE GARAGES, AND IT PROVIDED 152. >> SO THEY PROVIDED MORE. -- FORTUNATELY -- LOST AUDIO. >> TO GIVE YOU THE ABILITY TO DO THIS IN PHASE ONE, OTHERWISE IT WILL BE DEAD. >> RIGHT NOW, TO THE MAYOR'S QUESTION ON EVERYONE AND TO EVERY PHASE MOVING FORWARD. AND THE PARKING IS THERE TO MEET THE CODE. NOT THE P D CODE, TO MEET THE REGULAR PARKING CODE. WHICH WILL PUT IT BASICALLY IN THE BALLPARK WHERE IT SOUNDS LIKE RIGHT NOW, BUT THIS IS BY ACCIDENT ALMOST. >> THIS IS AROUND THE CALCULATION. IT WOULD HAVE ADDED, 80 TO NINETY SPACES. >> SO THAT ANSWERS THAT QUESTION. >> SO GOING TO THE DROP DATE START DATE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A BUSINESS, AND YOU GUYS FIGURE OUT WHEN THE PROFIT MAKES IT A POINT, TO MAKE SENSES TO BUILD IT. BUT OBVIOUSLY, IT WASN'T CAUGHT BEFORE. SO IT DIDN'T REALLY MATTER, BUT ALL OF A SUDDEN, IT WAS VERY CONVENIENT, AND THE FIRST BUILDING IS, 537 -- LOST AUDIO. >> AND IN REALITY, EVEN THOUGH -- AND I WILL GIVE CREDIT TO YOU AND TO THE, UM, PROPERTY OWNERS, ALSO KNOW, THAT THEY HAVE BEEN COMING WITH US -- IT'S AN HONOR TO HAVE THEM HERE. I'LL BE SAYING SOMETHING HERE, THAT IT'S NOT FULFILLED. -- LOST AUDIO. STAND BY. >> WAITING FOR AUDIO. STAND BY. >> WE CAN'T PREDICT THE FUTURE. AT LEAST -- >> AND THE CLUBHOUSE IS ANOTHER ASSOCIATION. SEPARATE, BUT MANAGED, CONTROLLED BY EACH OF THE ASSOCIATIONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY, TO HAVE A VOTE ON THAT, AND HAVING A SAY ON THAT. >> IT'S ONLY ONE, BECAUSE WE HAVE ONLY ONE ASSOCIATION. AND IT CAN -- AND THE COMMON AREAS, HOW'S THE CLUBHOUSE BEING HANDLED. IS THAT ASSOCIATION GOING TO BE RAN BY OTHER ASSOCIATIONS. IT WILL NOT, UM, NECESSARILY, HAVE ASSOCIATIONS -- AND THAT WILL NOT -- LOST AUDIO. >> USUALLY WHAT I HAVE SEEN, IS THAT WHEN THEY DIVIDE INTO PHASES, THEY HAVE THE MASTER, AND WHAT THEY DO IS ONE REPRESENTATIVE OF EACH OF THE ASSOCIATIONS WILL BE OF ONE OF THE RESIDENTS. WILL BE PART OF THE MASTER ASSOCIATION. AND THEY WILL TAKE CARE OF THE COMMON ELEMENTS, AND THAT'S HOW I HAVE SEEN IT -- LOST AUDIO. >> BUT THERE'S A CLUB -- WHICH I AM SURE THAT YOU HAVE DOCUMENTS ON THAT. MY CONCERN IS THAT THEY ARE LIVING THERE. AND THEY ARE WAITING FOR THIS A MEN IT'S, AND AS I UNDERSTAND IT. WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT THEY CAN FIGURE IT OUT WHEN THEY BUY THE PROPERTIES. >> THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO ENJOY THEIR AMENITIES AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I HAVE TO SEE. TO HAVE THE AMENITIES DONE, I HAVE GONE THROUGH THAT AS WELL, AND I KNOW HOW DIFFICULT IT IS. AND SO FAR, WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THAT, TO SET A DATE, BEFORE THE SECOND MEETING. SO THE CHANGES IN THE PARKING LOT. >> AND I HAVE ONE MORE THING THAT I HAVE TO PUT ON THE RADAR, I NOTICED WHEN YOU HAVE THE CHART. THE FIRST CASE IS 6 THOUSAND RETAIL SPACE. AND IT WAS IN THE THOUGHT OF RETAIL, AND NOT FOR RESTAURANTS WHICH REQUIRES MORE PARKING, AND THE SECOND DAYS, HAVE, EIGHT NINE THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. >> AND WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO PROVIDE IN THE SAME DOCUMENT IS THAT THE S I P L I N S, THAT COME AFTER. OR FOR WHAT AREAS. ABOUT THE ISSUE ON THE RETAIL, AND -- >> I WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR GETTING INVOLVED. WE GOT REALLY LUCKY. THAT YOU GOT THIS GOING ON, TO GO THROUGH THIS. AND I DO APPRECIATE IT. I DON'T WANT TO KEEP REPEATING MYSELF. LET'S VOTE SO YOU CAN GET WHAT YOU NEED. >> ONLY ONE THING, BECAUSE I WANT TO THANK ANNA, BECAUSE THIS CAME TO ME ON FRIDAY, ON THE AGENDA REVIEW, AND ANNA WAS VERY HELPFUL TO ANSWER SOME OF MY CAMERAS. >> ANNA, THE CAMERA IS NOT PANNING ON YOU. >> THE LAST THING IS THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE IN CONTACT WITH HIM. D: MOTION PASSES. >> HOW'S THE SCHOOL GOING? >> NO CONSTRUCTION YET? >> NO. NOT YET. >> BUT THE PARK IS REALLY NICE. >> ALL RIGHT. MADAM CLERK. >> AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE >> PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM IS OPENED. TAX AMENDMENTS, CHAPTER 63 GREEN BUILDING INCENTIVES, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. GIVE US YOUR OPINION IN A SHORT MANNER. OKAY. LET THE RECORD REFLECT NO ONE HAS CHOSEN TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE GREEN INCENTIVES. >> ALL RIGHT. J A V I E R IS THE EXPERT ON THIS. >> CHAPTER, 63: THIS IS THE SECOND READING ON THIS ITEM. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND. >> WE HAVE PROJECTS TO COME IN, AND WE HAVE CREATIVE EXCELLENCE AND ONE OF THE CRITERIA, IS THAT WE'RE NOT -- WE RECEIVED EXCELLENT BONUS. SO THEY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE GREEN BUILDINGS, THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A GREEN CERTIFICATION. AND THE PROBLEM IS THAT WHEN WE SIGN OFF ON THE PERMIT, THEY STAYED ON THE PLANS THAT IS GOING TO BE A GREEN BUILDING. >> IT MAY NOT BE A GREEN BUILDING. FOR THE CITY, AND IN THIS SCENARIO. WHAT WE'RE GOING TO PROPOSE IS A BOND WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY EQUIVALENT TO THE CITY. WHERE WE RELEASE THE PERMIT, AND IN 24 MONTHS, YOU HAVE TO GET THE CERTIFICATION. LOST AUDIO. >> IT REALLY STRENGTHENS THE GREEN BUILDING. -- LOST AUDIO. >> OKAY. CALL THE ROAD. >> CALLING ROLE: >> MOTION PASSES. >> ITEM, EAN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY EFFECTIVE DATE . >> PUBLIC SPEAKING IS OPEN ON THIS ITEM. ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT AT THIS TIME? COME ON UP AND GIVE US YOUR COMMENTS. IN A SHORT SUCCINCT AND CONCISE MANNER. >> OKAY. LET THE RECORD REFLECT NO ONE HAS CHOSEN TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME. >> MR. MANAGER, WHO WILL BE TAKING THIS? >> MAYOR, THIS IS THE SECOND READING OF THE ANNUAL EXERCISE TO UPDATE THE CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, NO CHANGES FROM FIRST TO SECOND READING. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. >> OKAY. HAS ANYBODY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENTERTAIN THE -- IS THERE A SECOND? >> ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS OR COMMENTS? >> THERE BEING NONE? . >> CALLING ROLE: >> ALL YES. MOTION PASSES. >> OKAY. NEXT ITEM. F: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE >> OKAY. THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THIS ITEM IS OPEN. >> YES, SIR. >> IS NOW OPEN. WOULD ANYBODY WANT TO SPEAK IN THIS ITEM? OKAY. LET THE RECORD REFLECT NO ONE HAS CHOSEN TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. DO YOU WANT TO GIVE THE STATEMENT ON THIS? >> WOULD ANYBODY WANT TO DISCUSS THIS ITEM? >> ANYBODY? >> THERE'S NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. >> J A V I E R? >> YES, MAYOR, THIS REQUEST IS A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT. IT OCCURRED ON AUGUST 28TH THE ONLY CHANGE IN THIS APPLICATION I HAVE A BRIEF POWER POINT, JUST TO SHOW THIS SLIDE, THE ONLY CHANGE FROM FIRST TO SECOND READING, IS THAT IT INCREASES, TO ONE NINE FIVE. THE LAND HAS ACQUIRED, EXTRA AREA LOCATED WEST OF UM, THE BUILDING TO THE RESTAURANT PARKING AREA, AND THE DEED HAS BEEN RECORDED AND IT'S IN OUR OFFICE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO EXAMINE IT. THERE HAS BEEN NO OTHER CHANGES. >> AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL? >> STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS. >> ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? THE APPLICANT IS HERE, HE DOESN'T NEED TO SAY ANYTHING, UNLESS HE SO CHOOSES. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECONDED BY CABRAL. >> CALL THE ROLE. >> CALLING ROLE: >> ALL YES. MOTION PASSES. >> G: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON JULY 28TH. >> THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION IS OPEN AT THIS TIME. FOR THIS ITEM, THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. DORAL COURT REZONING, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? NO ONE HAS SPOKEN OR CHOSEN TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME. EVEN THOUGH I HAVE YOU HERE MR. PRICE. >> MR. PRICE, THANK YOU FOR FILLING OUT THE CARD, NO NEED TO SPEAK. J A V I E R COME ON UP. THIS ITEM IS THE ROW ZONING. THE COMPANION ITEM. THAT WE JUST HEARD. I WOULD LIKE TO SHOW YOU THIS ITEM. >> FIRST READING? >> THE CHANGE WAS THAT THE ACREAGE WENT FROM, 6.15 IT'S RECORDED. AND THE APPLICANT HAS A MASTERS DEVELOPMENT HERE. AND THE DECLARATION OF THE -- IN THE FUTURE, IF HE WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM -- LOST AUDIO. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. AND SECONDED. AND THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL? >> STAFF'S RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION. >> ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS? THERE BEING NONE, MADAM CLERK, CALL THE ROLE. >> CALLING ROLE: >> ALL YES. >> MOTION PASSES. >> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN THAT WRAPS UP THE BUSINESS FOR TONIGHT, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN? >> END OF MEETING.