POLISCOPE

The public record

OAKLEY (CONTRACOSTA COUNTY)Decisions and attributed speech publishedPartial coverage

Apr 9, 2024 - 06:27 PM

Tuesday, April 9, 2024 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Apr 9, 2024 - 06:27 PM

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record and a transcript or captions are published for this meeting.

People and votes

Commissioner Dr. Fuller

1 statement

  1. Statement

    Commented on the public comment submitted reporting the encampment on.

    Official record

What people said

Attributed speechA separate authority lane. Speech is evidence of what a person said, never of what the board decided.
  • The official minutes identify speakers and topics, but summarize rather than quote their exact words.

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Aug 3, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

This source published text without speaker turns, so speakers and timestamps are not shown.

The opening of 71,713 stored characters

>> GOOD EVENING. THIS IS THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL, OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY. THIS MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL MEMBER DR. GEORGE FULLER WILL JOIN VIA TELECONFERENCE, AND HIS LOCATION IS THE HILTON GARDEN INN, PHILADELPHIA CENTER CITY, ROOM 973, 1100 ARCH STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, 19107. I WILL NOW CALL ROLL. COUNCIL MEMBER HENDERSON. >> HERE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER FULLER. >> HERE. >> COUNCIL MEMBER MEADOWS. >> HERE. >> VICE MAYOR SHAW. >> HERE. >> AND I AM THE MAYOR, ANISSA WILLIAMS, PRESENT. WE WILL NOW HAVE THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE READ TO -- OR RECITED BY DANIEL ADAIR. THIS IS DANIEL ADAIR. HE ATTENDS EIGHTH GRADE AT DELTA VISTA MIDDLE SCHOOL. HE IS ON THE PRINCIPAL'S HONOR ROLL AND IS A MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA JUNIOR SCHOLARSHIP FEDERATION, CJSF. CJSF IS AN ORGANIZATION THAT FOSTERS HIGH STANDARDS OF SCHOLARSHIP, SERVICE, AND CITIZENSHIP IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES. CJSF EMPHASIZES SERVICE TO THE SCHOOL AND THE COMMUNITY WHILE ENCOURAGING PRIDE IN SCHOLASTIC ACHIEVEMENT. AS PART OF HIS SERVICE PROJECTS FOR THE SCHOOL, HE HELPS CLEANING UP THE CLASSROOMS AND SCHOOL GROUNDS, MAKES CARDS FOR MILITARY MEMBERS AND SENIORS IN THE COMMUNITY. DANIEL LIKES SCHOOL BECAUSE HE GETS TO LEARN NEW THINGS AND MAKE NEW FRIENDS. HIS FAVORITE SUBJECTS ARE MATH AND DRAMA. HE ENJOYS SINGING, AND HIS HOBBY IS THEATER. HE PERFORMED IN THREE SHOWS WITH PITTSBURG COMMUNITY THEATER, "ELF JR.," "LITTLE MERMAID," AND "FROZEN." HE TAKES ADVANCED DRAMA CLASS AT HIS SCHOOL. HE ALSO ENJOYS TRAVELING. LAST OCTOBER, HE TRAVELED TO THE EAST COAST WITH HIS SCHOOL. HE VISITED WASHINGTON, D.C., PHILADELPHIA, VIRGINIA, AND NEW YORK. HE LEARNED A LOT ABOUT AMERICAN HISTORY DURING THE TRIP. HIS FAVORITE PART OF THE TRIP WAS GOING TO NEW YORK CITY, WHERE HE GOT TO SEE TIMES SQUARE AND "THE LION KING" ON BROADWAY. >> NOW LET US BEGIN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, EVERYONE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. >> ALRIGHT, I SHOULD HAVE JUST STAYED STANDING, BUT WE ARE NOW GOING TO PRESENT A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING APRIL 7th THROUGH THE 13th, 2024, AS NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK AND ALSO RECEIVE AND UPDATE FROM OAKLEY LIBRARY MANAGER LISA CANO-LOOMIS. IF YOU COULD MEET ME AT THE PODIUM. ALRIGHT, PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRIL 7th THROUGH THE 13th, 2024. WHEREAS LIBRARIES OFFER THE OPPORTUNITY FOR EVERYONE TO CONNECT WITH OTHER, LEARN NEW SKILLS, AND PURSUE THEIR PASSIONS NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE ON LIFE'S JOURNEY, AND WHEREAS LIBRARIES SERVE AS TRUSTED INSTITUTIONS STRIVING TO ENSURE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND SERVICES FOR ALL MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY, AND WHEREAS LIBRARIES ARE ACCESSIBLE AND INCLUSIVE PLACES THAT PROMOTE A SENSE OF LOCAL CONNECTION AND SHARED COMMUNITY GOALS, AND WHEREAS LIBRARIES PLAY A PIVOTAL ROLE IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BY PROVIDING RESOURCES AND SUPPORT FOR JOB SEEKERS, ENTREPRENEURS AND SMALL BUSINESS, THUS CONTRIBUTING TO LOCAL PROSPERITY AND GROWTH, AND WHEREAS LIBRARIES ARE AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC AND FUNDAMENTAL IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES, WORKING TO PROTECT THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION AND LITERACY AND PROMOTE THE FREE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND IDEAS, AND WHEREAS LIBRARY WORKERS ARE JOINING LIBRARY SUPPORTERS AND ADVOCATES ACROSS THE NATION TO CELEBRATE NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, ANISSA WILLIAMS, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF OAKLEY, ALONG WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL, HEREBY PROCLAIM NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRIL 7th THROUGH THE 13th, 2024. DURING THIS WEEK, ALL RESIDENTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO VISIT OUR LIBRARY AND CELEBRATE ADVENTURES AND OPPORTUNITIES THEY UNLOCK FOR US EVERY DAY. >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR RECOGNIZING -- OH. THANK YOU FOR RECOGNIZING NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK AND THE IMPORTANCE OF LIBRARIES AND LIBRARY WORKERS. I ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO VISIT THE LIBRARY, FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA, TELL YOUR FRIENDS, CHECK OUT BOOKS, VISIT US, TALK TO US. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> I'M GONNA TRY. LET ME SEE. HOPEFULLY, I'LL BE ABLE TO DO IT THIS TIME. HELLO, MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS. I AM LISA CANO-LOOMIS. I'M THE MANAGER OF THE OAKLEY LIBRARY, A BRANCH OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM. TODAY I'M GONNA COVER THREE MAIN TOPICS. ONE IS A SHORT REVIEW OF THE PAST YEAR FOR THE LIBRARY SYSTEM AS A WHOLE. THEN I'LL TALK A LITTLE ABOUT THE OAKLEY LIBRARY SPECIFICALLY. AND THEN I'LL WRAP UP BY DISCUSSING HOW THE COMMUNITY WOULD BENEFIT FROM A BIGGER LIBRARY. SO, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARIES SAW AN INCREASE IN CIRCULATION OF 15% FROM FISCAL YEAR 2022 TO FISCAL YEAR '23, MEANING PEOPLE CHECKED OUT MORE FROM THE LIBRARY, INCLUDING MATERIALS SUCH AS BOOKS, MUSIC CDs, DVDs, MAGAZINES, AUDIO BOOKS, STEAM KITS, WI-FI HOT SPOTS, STORIES TO GO KITS, UKULELES, CALIFORNIA STATE PARK PASSES, AND OUTDOOR EXPLORER BACKPACKS. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARIES ALSO SAW AN INCREASE OF 22% FOR E-BOOK CHECKOUTS OVER THE SAME TIME PERIOD. SORRY, THAT'S NOT... PRESENTING CORRECTLY. OVERALL, LIBRARY VISITS INCREASED. IN-PERSON VISITS INCREASED 38%, AND VIRTUAL VISITS INCREASED 21%. HERE ARE THE MOST POPULAR BOOKS OF 2023. EVEN THOUGH WE TALK ABOUT LIBRARIES BEING MORE THAN JUST BOOKS, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT BOOKS AREN'T STILL RELEVANT. READING BOOKS BENEFITS YOUR MIND AND BODY. IT CAN REDUCE STRESS, STRENGTHEN YOUR BRAIN, AND BUILD VOCABULARY. BOOKS PROMOTE EMPATHY AND ALLOW US TO UNDERSTAND OTHER PEOPLE, EVEN PEOPLE DIFFERENT THAN OURSELVES. THERE'S ALSO THE PURE ENJOYMENT AND ENTERTAINMENT VALUE OF READING. BOOKS TAKE YOU TO PLACES YOU'VE NEVER BEEN BEFORE. LAST YEAR, WE INTRODUCED A NEW ALL-ELECTRIC EARLY LITERACY OUTREACH VAN CALLED THE ROLLING READER. THE VAN PROVIDES NEW BOOKS AND LITERACY ACTIVITIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN IN UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES. EXCUSE ME. WITH THE GOAL OF INTRODUCING THEM TO BOOKS AND READING AT AN EARLY AGE. RESEARCH SHOWS THAT CREATING POSITIVE EXPERIENCES WITH BOOKS SETS THE STAGE FOR A CHILD'S SUCCESS IN LEARNING TO READ. LITERACY SKILLS ARE ALSO A STRONG PREDICTOR OF HEALTH, EMPLOYMENT STATUS, AND OVERALL SUCCESS IN LIFE. THIS PAST JULY, THE LIBRARY CELEBRATED THREE NEW GRADUATES FROM OUR CAREER ONLINE HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM. THE PROGRAM PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADULTS TO EARN AN ACCREDITED HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA FOR FREE THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY, THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY, AND SMART HORIZONS CAREER ONLINE EDUCATION. IN 2023, WE CELEBRATED THE FORMATION OF THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF CONTRA COSTA. ITS GOAL IS TO SUPPORT THE LIBRARY'S NEED FOR MORE FUNDING TO SUPPORT ITS MISSION AND TO ADDRESS THE EQUITY GAPS IN FUNDING THAT EXIST AMONGST THE 26 LIBRARIES. 26 LIBRARY BRANCHES. THE LFCC WILL HELP BUILD AND REFRESH LIBRARIES, FUND NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND DIGITAL RESOURCES, AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROGRAM FUNDING FOR PEOPLE OF ALL AGES. NOW I'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING AT THE OAKLEY LIBRARY. SO HERE ARE OUR -- THE WINNERS OF OUR FIRST BOOKMARK ART CONTEST. WE WERE IMPRESSED BY ALL THE TALENTED ARTISTS WHO SUBMITTED CREATIVE DESIGNS BASED ON ONE OF TWO THEMES, THE CELEBRATION OF READING AND THE CELEBRATION OF SCIENCE. THESE BEAUTIFUL BOOKMARKS ARE AVAILABLE FOR FREE TO PICK UP AT THE OAKLEY LIBRARY. THE OAKLEY LIBRARY WAS VERY BUSY STEAMING UP SPRING BREAK. WE OFFERED ONE PROGRAM A DAY FOR TWO WEEKS. THE PROGRAMS WERE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, ART, AND MATH RELATED. THERE WAS CARTOON DRAWING AND ANIMAL SKETCHING WITH MR. ABE. THERE WAS -- EXCUSE ME -- MEXICAN TIN ART, ROCKETS, OWL PELLETS, SNAKES, LEGOS, AND BUBBLES. FAMILIES PACKED THE LIBRARY TO SEE STERLING THE BUBBLESMITH, EXCUSE ME, BLOW BUBBLES WITH HIS HANDS, AS WELL AS WITH HOOPS, LOOPS, AND OTHER CONTRAPTIONS. KIDS AND ADULTS WERE AMAZED TO BE ENVELOPED IN LIFE-SIZE BUBBLES. DURING THE LINDSAY AND THE COMMUNITY PRESENTS SCALES AND TAILS, FAMILIES GOT TO MEET SOME SCARY AND CRAWLY ANIMALS, INCLUDING THE SNAKE IN THE PICTURE, THE BIG ONE IN THE MIDDLE. FAMILIES LEARNED ABOUT OWLS AND GOT UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL WITH OUR PELLETS DURING EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK PRESENTS HOOTING HABITATS. DURING OUR PROGRAM, KIDS GOT TO DESIGN AND BUILD THEIR OWN PAPER-BASED DUCT TAPED ROCKETS AND TOOK THE ROCKETS OUTSIDE TO SEE HOW HIGH THEY WOULD GO USING OUR AIR-POWERED ROCKET LAUNCHER. ONCE A MONTH, WE HAVE A FUN PROGRAM FOR NEURO-DIVERSION CHILDREN AND FAMILIES CALLED SENSORY PLAYTIME, WHERE THEY PLAY, CRAFT, AND READ. THIS PROGRAM HAS BEEN WELL RECEIVED ONE PARENT POSTED ON HER FACEBOOK PAGE, SAYING, AS A PARENT OF TWO NEURO-DIVERGENT KIDDOS, PLEASE KNOW HOW MUCH WE APPRECIATE YOU DOING THIS. KEEP IT UP AND THANK YOU. FOR THOSE WITH SENSORY PROCESSING DISORDERS THAT MIGHT MAKE COMING TO THE LIBRARY CHALLENGING, WE'RE EXCITED TO ANNOUNCE OUR BRAND-NEW SENSORY BACKPACK. AND HAS CALLING TO --CALLING TOOLS LIKE DIGIT TOYS, HEADPHONES AND A CUSHION TO USE DURING THEIR VISIT. NOW, I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS HOW THE COMMUNITY WOULD BENEFIT FROM A BIGGER LIBRARY. SO, LIBRARIES ARE A THIRD SPACE. WE HAVE OUR FIRST SPACE AT HOME, SECOND SPACE AT WORK. THIRD SPACE S ARE PLACES OUTSIDE OF HOME AND WORK LIKE A CAFE, CLUB, BOOKSTORES AND LIBRARIES. THIRD SPACE IS BRINGING YOU PUT TOGETHER AND STRENGTHEN COMMUNITIES. THEY ARE INFORMAL SPACES WHERE RANDOM INTENTIONAL IN-PERSON RELATIONSHIP TERMINATE. LIBRARIES ARE ONE OF THE LAST PLACES YOU CAN GO WITH NO EXPECTATION TO BUY ANYTHING. YOU DON'T NEED TO PAY TO ATTEND A MOVIE NIGHT, A LIVE MUSIC PERFORMANCE, A MAGIC SHOW, DO SOME LASER OR 3-D PRINTING OR ANY OF THE MYRIAD PROGRAMS AND SERVICES LIBRARIES PROVIDE. BUT, TO BE A GOOD THIRD SPACE, YOU NEED SPACE. LIBRARIES ARE WELCOMING AND SAFE SPACES FOR LIBRARIES BILLED UNITY, LIBRARIES PROMOTE LITERACY AND MORE. IN A BIGGER LIBRARY, WE CAN DO WHAT WE DO AND DO A BETTER AND FOR MORE PEOPLE. THERE COULD BE DIFFERENT AREAS FOR A VARIETY OF AGES, INTERESTS, AND ACTIVITIES. THERE COULD BE SPACE FOR MORE SEATING AND A MIXTURE OF SEATING AND WORK SURFACES. THERE CAN BE QUIETER SPACES AND NOISIER SPACES, AND SPACES TO GET MESSY. THERE COULD BE A SPACE FOR SELECT ACTIVITIES THAT ARE SOLO AND GROUP. THERE WILL BE MORE FLEXIBILITY IN THE SCHEDULE, MEANING WE CAN OFFER PROGRAMS FOR SENIORS AND HAVE A PLACE FOR TEENS TO HANG OUT AND HAVE -- LET'S SEE --PROGRAMS FOR SENIORS , A PLACE FOR TEENS TO HANG OUT, AND HAVE STORYTIME HAPPENING ALL AT THE SAME TIME. WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO CHOOSE ONE OVER THE OTHER. IN A BIGGER LIBRARY, EACH ACTIVITY WOULD HAVE ITS OWN SPACE. A BIGGER LIBRARY WOULD ALLOW SPACE FOR PARTNERSHIPS WITH COUNTY, CITY AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS TO BRING SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO THE COMMUNITY. THE SPACE WILL BE INCLUSIVE AND A.D.A. ACCESSIBLE. LIBRARY LOCATED IN THE CITY CENTER WOULD BE A BOOST TO THE LOCAL ECONOMY, BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE SPEND TIME AT THE LIBRARY, THEY SPEND MONEY AND NEARBY BUSINESSES. SORRY. IT IS NOT -- GOING TOO WELL -- HOPEFULLY THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH BENEFIT FROM A BETTER AND INVITED DEDICATED SPACE THAT WOULD INCLUDE THINGS SUCH AS SPACE FOR STORYTIME AND CLASS VISITS, INTERACTIVE TABLES, AND TOYS THAT PROMOTE IMAGINATIVE PLAY AND EARLY LITERACY, BIGGER SPACES , AND IN MANY COUNTRIES TODAY, THERE AREN'T MANY PLACES FOR TEENS TO HANG OUT. THAT'S WHY OAKLEY TEENS NEED AN EXCITING, BIGGER, AND DEDICATED TEAM AREA TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF GRANT THAT ALLOWED THEM TO DISCOVER, BE CREATIVE, FUN AND GROW. THE TEEN CENTRAL MONSTER PUBLIC LIBRARY IS A GREAT EXAMPLE, AND THAT IS WHERE THE PICTURE COME FROM. A LARGER LIBRARY WOULD HAVE SPACE FOR GROUPS , STUDY ROOMS, AND MEETING ROOMS FOR EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, AND COMMUNITY-RELATED MEETINGS, PROGRAMS, AND ACTIVITIES. FRIENDS OF THE OAKLEY LIBRARY COULD HAVE A LARGER SPACE TO STORE AND SELL ONLY THE BOOKS TO RAISE FUNDS TO SUPPORT LIBRARY PROGRAMS, PERFORMANCES, AND SPECIAL EVENTS FOR THE COMMUNITY. AS WELL AS PROVIDE BOOKS FOR THE SUMMER READING PROGRAM, CRAFT SUPPLIES, S.T.E.M. AND 3-D PRINTING SUPPLIES, LEGOS, AND SO MUCH MORE. A LARGER LIBRARY, THE OAKLEY COMMUNITY WOULD BENEFIT FROM ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES, IT WOULD BE A UNIFYING SPACE FOR THE WHOLE COMMUNITY INCLUDING SENIORS, YOUTH, AND VETERANS. A NEW LARGER LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY CENTER IN OAKLEY WOULD REVITALIZE THE CITY CENTER AND DRAW PEOPLE DOWNTOWN TO THE AREA TO LIVE, WORK, AND PLAY. OPEN TO QUESTIONS. >> COMMISSIONER MATOS? >> CAN YOU GO BACK TO SLIDE 14, PLEASE? SORRY. >> OKAY. THIS ONE. >> THAT ONE. SEE THAT ONE ON THE LEFT? >> YES THAT WALL? >> I BELIEVE THAT THEIR DONOR NAMES ARE THERE ON THE PLEASANT HILL LIBRARY. >> I FIGURED THAT. I CAN SEE ENOUGH OF IT. I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THAT IS WHAT IT WILL TAKE. >> YEAH. >> THE LIBRARY HERE. >> COMMISSIONER FOLDER, ANY QUESTIONS ON THE PHONE? >> NO. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION FOR LOOK FORWARD TO MEETING WITH YOU I LIKE THIS ON OUR WEBPAGE. WE NOW HAVE A BACKGROUND OF EITHER THE LIBRARY OR THE CITY CENTER WITH THE LIBRARY, AND THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN BEGIN ENVISIONING AND UNWINDING. SO, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE PRESENTATION. >> THANK YOU. >> YOU TOO. >> ARE UP AND MOVING ON TO ITEM 2, PUBLIC COMMENTS. AT THIS TIME, PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE HERDED FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. I HAVE PUBLIC SPEAKER CARDS SUBMITTED. ANYBODY ELSE WHO WANTS TO SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE COMPLETE A BLUE SPEAKER CARD LOCATED IN THE LOBBY AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK. THE TIME LIMIT TO SPEAK IS THREE MINUTES. THE TIME LIMIT IS MONITORED BY THE TIMER LOCATED IN FRONT OF MY SEAT. WHEN ONE MINUTE REMAINS ON THE TIMER, IT WILL BEEP ONCE AS A REMINDER TO COMPLETE COMMENTS BEFORE HERE I'M EXPIRES. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM ANY APPLAUSE, CHEERING, BILLING OR OTHER OUTBURSTS SO EVERYONE MAY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. NOTE, DUE TO PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW, THE COUNCIL IS NOT ALLOWED TO ENGAGE IN DIALOGUE REGARDING COMMONS. STAFF MAY BE DIRECTED TO RESPOND TO PERSONS MAKING PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE ALSO DID RECEIVE ONE, WHICH WILL BE ENTERED IN THE PUBLIC RECORD, THAT THE SPEAKER DID NOT WISH TO SPEAK. ALL RIGHT. OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS RICHARD BROFI. >> GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. DR. RICHARD BROFI, RESIDENT OF OAKLEY SINCE 1992. LAST MONTH, I WAS HERE, UNFORTUNATELY, DIDN'T GET THE TIMEFRAME, BUT I PROVIDED YOU ALL WITH IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE ABOUT THE UNCONSCIONABLE BURDEN BROUGHT ON TO OUR COUNTRY BY ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. THESE STATISTICS ARE NOT BY SOME POLITICAL AFFILIATION. THEY'RE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE DRAWN TO SANCTUARY CITIES, WHERE THERE IS AN ALLOWANCE TO PLACE --AGAIN --AN UNCONSCIONABLE BURDEN ON THE TAXPAYER AND ARE COMMUNITY IS SEEING THEM COMMIT CRIMES AND A DISPROPORTIONATE PERCENTAGE RELATED TO THE POPULATION. ANYTIME YOU TURN ON THE TV, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE ILLEGAL ALIEN ATTACKING SOME CITIZEN OR ATTACKING A ENFORCEMENT OFFICER BECAUSE I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO REGARD FOR OUR LAWS. NOT ALL OF THEM, BUT ENOUGH OF THEM TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED. JUST TODAY, 125,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS WERE TRANSPORTED TO SAN DIEGO. I WAS A TRUSTEE IN A CHURCH WANTS, AND MY ANSWER TO EVERYTHING WAS HOW ARE YOU GOING TO PAY FOR IT. YOU ARE NOT, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO RAISE TAXES IN AN ALREADY HIGHLY-TAXED STATE. I AM TOLD WE CAN REMOVE OPPOSITE THE OF THE BALLOT BOX --THOSE WHO HAVE A RATHER CAVALIER APPROACH TO ENFORCING OUR LAWS. WE'RE BASICALLY ON OUR OWN. OAKLEY IS NOT A CENTURY CITY , FOR THE RECORD, AND WHAT I'M ASKING IS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAKE A PUBLIC PROCLAMATION THAT OAKLEY --FROM THERE NOT A CENTURY CITY, AND THAT OAKLEY IMMEDIATELY, AND OUR WEBSITE ON PAGE 1 TO INDICATE THAT OAKLEY IS NOT A CENTURY CITY, THAT WE ARE A CITY THAT OBEYS THE LAW. I WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE THIS INFORMATION WITH YOU. I OBVIOUSLY MADE IT WITHIN THREE MINUTES THIS TIME. I WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE YOU WITH THE CONVICTIONS WITH YOUR OATH OF ALLEGIANCE. I WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE YOU WITH THIS. I HOPE YOU WILL REFER TO THIS BEFORE YOU VOTE, AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO MAKE IT SO WE CAN SEE WHO REALLY TOOK THIS OATH OF OFFICE SERIOUSLY. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. >> BUT YOU DO NOT HAVE AN ITEM NUMBER. I AM ASSUMING IS FOR -- OKAY. GREAT. >> HELLO, CITY COUNCIL. MAYOR WILLIAMS, ONCE AGAIN, I AM HERE IN SPRING. WE GOT SOME TIME TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT NEXT FALL. WE'LL HAVE THE SALMON SPOT BUT I FIGURE 1000 FITCH GOT POST OUT OF THE CREEK LAST YEAR. 1000 OFFICE THAT CAN BE SAID ONE-WAY OR THE OTHER, ONE-ON-ONE, COUNTED 501 DAY, THEY WERE GONE THAT AFTERNOON. I COUNTED 25, THEY'RE GONE THAT AFTERNOON. I HAVE BEEN DOWN THERE WALKING TO SEAT IT. IT IS VERY SERIOUS. OUR NUMBERS ARE DOWN. WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A COMMERCIAL TO EXPORT FISHING ON THE SEASON ONCE AGAIN. IT'S SHUT DOWN. I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT ARE AFFECTED BY THIS. THE LAWLESSNESS WITH IT DOESN'T HELP. SO, I WANT TO THANK MAYOR WILLIAMS FOR HELPING OUT , REACHING OUT TO ME, LOOKING AT THE DATA, DOING SOME FOOTWORK THAT WAY, BECAUSE IT IS MORE SERIOUS THAN PEOPLE REALIZED. WE'RE BASICALLY ALLOWING THIS TO BECOME AN EXTINCTION ISSUE, RATHER THAN TAKING CARE OF IT AND LOOKING AT IT. ANYWAYS, THERE HAS BEEN A FEW PEOPLE GETTING TOGETHER ON THIS. TRYING, YOU KNOW, TO DO SOME THINGS, POSITIVE TALKS, MEETINGS I HAVE BEEN TO, BUT IT IS JUST, AGAIN, I WANT TO THANK --EARLIER, GEORGE FULLER MADE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS ONE-WAY ABOUT IT. SHE HAS DONE HER HOMEWORK AND LOOKED UP A FEW THINGS THAT JUSTIFIES DOING SOMETHING MORE THAN WE'RE DOING. YOU SEE 1000 GO DOWN TO ZERO, NO 1 TICKET GIVEN, 1 CITATION, AND NO MORE FISH GETTING BACK INTO THE SYSTEM THAT BELONGS IN, ESPECIALLY AFTER WE HAVE DONE THIS BEAUTIFUL WORK IN THIS CREEK, MAKING THIS CONNECTION AGAIN THAT ALLOWS PROPER SPOTTING AGAIN. POLITICO FOR NOT, I DON'T THINK THAT IS THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO GO RIGHT NOW IT IS! I WANT TO SAY FALL IS COMING IN SEPTEMBER, NOVEMBER, SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER OR NOVEMBER. NOVEMBER, IT WILL BE PARAMOUNT IN PATROLLING THAT AND MAKING SURE THAT SOME FINES ARE HANDED OUT. POSITION ALONE IS A FINE. THERE SHOULD BE NO DISCUSSION TO HAVE A SUCH AN ITEM, SPECIAL PEOPLE OUT OF WORK BECAUSE OF IT. PEOPLE LOSING THEIR BUSINESSES, $500,000 FISHING BOATS BEING LOST RIGHT TO LEFT DUE TO THIS. THAT WOULD BE LIKE THE EQUIVALENT OF SOMEONE KNOCKING DOWN A SMALL BUSINESS HERE AND IT DISAPPEARS. I KNOW SOME PEOPLE THE MAXIMUM THE GOOD MONEY DOING THAT WHEN IT'S RIGHT, AND THEY DO IT IN A LAWFUL WAY. SO, ANY HELP THERE, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO ITEM 3, COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS. COUNCILMEMBER MATTERS --MATOS? >> I WANT TO KNOW --IF YOU ANSWER, YOU HAVE TO ANSWER, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN. BUT --YOU CAN TELL ME LATER. >> ALL RIGHT. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS? COUNCILMEMBER FOLDER, YOU HAVE ANY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS? >> YES. FIRST, ON THE LETTER FROM THE CITIZEN OF THIS I DON'T HAVE HIS NAME. I WILL NAME HER RIGHT NOW. ANYWAY, REPORTING ON THE ENCAMPMENT FOR THE RURAL OVERPASS BY 160, I AM COMMENTING BECAUSE I RECENTLY HAVE MANAGER McMURRAY ABOUT THE SITUATION, AND HE REMINDED ME IT IS IN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH, SO JUST TO BE AWARE OF THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT IT, I AM SURE, BUT IT IS THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AREA, AND THEY HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO COMMEND PHILADELPHIA. I'M HERE ON THE E.R.A. CONFERENCE. THERE IS NO BRING IT UP AS PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA HAS A REPUTATION AS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL CITY FOR DISABLED PERSONS. RIGHT BEHIND THEM IS PHILADELPHIA, AND I JUST WANT TO SAY, BEING A DISABLED PERSON , THEY ARE VERY WELCOMING AND ACCESSIBLE. I WANTED TO COMMEND THAT. SO, THANK YOU. >> I JUST HAVE ONE COMMENT. THERE WAS, RECENTLY, GOVERNOR NEWSOM DID A REPORT ON THE SNOWPACK, AND ALL HE WAS REPORTING ON, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE AT THESE RECORD LEVELS THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, HE SAID THAT WATER IS STILL A HUGE ISSUE FOR CALIFORNIA AS A WHOLE, AND IN THE ARTICLE, AND IN SEVERAL SUBSEQUENT ARTICLES, HE DID VOWED TO BRING BACK A DELTA CONVEYANCE PROJECT IN HIS WATER PLANS. SO, I KNOW THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE, AS A COUNCIL, AND OUR RESIDENTS ARE AGAINST. SO, I JUST WANTED PEOPLE TO BE AWARE THAT THAT'S COMING BACK AROUND. SO -- ALL RIGHT. WE ARE NOW MOVING ONTO THE CONSENT CALENDAR BEFORE WE DISCUSS WHAT ITEMS NEED TO BE PULLED. ITEM 4.4 WILL BE CONTINUED. DO WE HAVE A DATE NOW? >> HOPEFULLY, OUR NEXT MEETING. >> OKAY. SO, IF ANYBODY WAS GOING TO PULL FOR 4.4, IT WAS OFFICE CALENDAR FOR NOW. THAT BEING SAID, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY ITEMS THEY WISH TO PULL? >> 4.2. >> 4.1. >> I WANTED TO PULL 4.6. >> ALL RIGHT.WE'LL GO IN ORDER. 4.1. >> SORRY. >> SORRY. >> DO I HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE THE REST? >> THANK YOU. >> APPROVAL OF THE REST OF THE ITEMS ON CONSENT FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND. >> AND WE NEED TO DO A ROLL CALL.ON THAT. CORRECT? >> OKAY. >> GO AHEAD. >> COUNCILMEMBER MEADOWS? >> AYE. >> DR. FULLER? >> AYE. >> COUNCILMEMBER HENDERSON? >> AYE. >> VICE-MAYOR SHAW? >> AYE. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> YES. >> THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >> ALL RIGHT. SO, 4.1. >> SO, I READ THROUGH THE CHANGES THAT WERE PROPOSED, AND I ALSO WENT BACK AND RE-WATCHED THE LAST MEETING, WHERE SOME OF THESE CHANGES WERE SUGGESTED, AND I AM NOTICING THAT SOME OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE EVEN FURTHER BEYOND WHAT WAS SUGGESTED AT THE LAST MEETING. I HAVE NO PROBLEM CHANGING THE SPELLING OF THE LAST NAME TO W, A, H L, BUT I BELIEVE THAT THE MINUTES WERE DETAILED TO, YOU KNOW, AS THEY COULD HAVE BEEN, AND IF WE CHANGE BASED ON WHAT ONE OF THE COMMENTS AT THE LAST MEETING -- WHAT I MEANT TO SAY WAS -- AND I THINK IT IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE TO START DOING, BECAUSE WE ALL GET UP HERE, AND WE SAY THINGS, AND WE HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO SAY. MAYBE IT DOESN'T, ACCEPTED THAT WAY. BUT IF WE KEEP GOING BACK AND CHANGING ALL THAT WAS MEANT TO BE SAID, OR WHAT THEY WERE REFERENCING, I THINK THAT'S A PROBLEM FOR ME. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT CHANGING MINUTES BEFORE. AND SO, I'M NOT SUPPORTING ANY OTHER CHANGES. >> OKAY. SO, IF WE WANTED TO MOVE THIS ITEM TO KEEP THE ORIGINAL CHANGES EXCEPT FOR THE SPELLING ERROR ON DAVE WAHL'S LAST NAME, WE WOULD MOTION THAT? IS THAT CORRECT? >> YES.I BELIEVE YOU CAN DO THAT WITH THE OTHER CHANGES THAT ARE AMENDABLE. >> I'M SORRY. CAN YOU EXPAND THAT? >> MAYBE I CAN EXPLAIN. IF IT'S THE PLEASURE OF THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE AMENDED MINUTES, BUT THE AMENDMENT'S SHOWN IN RED --THEN THE COUNSEL CAN SIMPLY MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT --TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED. IF IT'S THE PLEASURE OF THE COUNSEL TO GO BACK TO THE PREVIOUS VERSION, I WOULD SAY, IT WAS CONSIDERED UNDER LAST MEETING AND THE MOTION CAN BE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES WITHOUT CHANGES SHOWN IN RED, AND A THIRD OPTION IS IF THERE'S A CHANGE THAT YOU DO EXCEPT, WHICH IS THE GENTLEMEN'S NAME, WE CAN MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS ORIGINALLY DRAFTED, WITHOUT THE CHANGES EXCEPT FOR THE GENTLEMEN'S NAME. DID I JUST -- MAKE A MUCH MORE CONFUSING? >> NO. YOU EXPLAINED IT, FOR ME, AS WELL. OF COURSE, I WOULD BE OPPOSED TO MOVING THEM BACK. I DISAGREE WITH THE MEETING MINUTES. THEY SHOULD BE DETAILED. THEY SHOULD BE CORRECT. I WAS ASKED TO PUT --WHAT MY WORDS WERE --IN WRITING. I DID SO. NOBODY ASKED FOR A WORD-FOR-WORD VERBATIM. SO, JUST A SUMMARY OF WHAT I SAID IS ACCURATE. DO NOT INCLUDE THEM WOULD BE A DISSERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. WE RELY ON THE MINUTES, DESPITE WHATEVER ANYBODY THINKS. MANY CORRECTIONS, THEY NEED TO BE CORRECTED. I HAVE SEEN IT GO ON FOR A COUPLE OF, MAYBE, TWO OR THREE MEETINGS, GET IT CORRECT, BUT WE JUST CAN'T SAY, WELL, YOU DIDN'T DO RIGHT, SO WE WON'T PUT IT OUT NOW, BECAUSE WE WON'T GO BACK AND CHANGE THE MINUTES --WHATEVER THEY SAY --THE FIRST TIME, THAT'S NUTS. I WOULD OPPOSE ANY OF THAT. I WILL MOVE THAT THE MEETING, THE MINUTES , BE AS AMENDED, BE APPROVED. >> OKAY. NOT SEEING A SECOND, THAT MOTION DIES. DO WE HAVE ANOTHER MOTION ON THE FLOOR? >> I MAKE A MOTION TO REVERT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE NAME CHANGE FROM DAVID WALL, W, A, L, L TO DAVID WAHL, W, A, H, L. >> CALL ROLL? >> COUNCILMEMBER MEADOWS? >> AYE. >> DR. FULLER? >> NO, WITH THE CAVEAT THAT THIS AMENDMENT WILL BE A NEW ATTACHMENT TO THESE MINUTES. THE MINUTES FOR NEXT MINUTES. SO, I WROTE NO. >> COUNCILMEMBER HENDERSON? >> YES. >> VICE-MAYOR SHAW? >> YES. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> YES. >> THE ITEM PASSES 4-1. >> 4-2, I BELIEVE, COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? >> YES. I DON'T KNOW IF I PRONOUNCED IT RIGHT, WHERE, OR WHAT, BUT UNDER COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, I HAD, IT WAS A GOOD MEETING FROM THERE, AND I COULDN'T REMEMBER THE NAME, REALLY, BUT RANDALL, R, A, N, D, A, L, L WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND THE WATER DISTRICT BOARD. IF THERE'S NO OTHER COMMENTS, I WILL MOVE APPROVAL AS AMENDED. >> I DIDN'T HEAR THE AMENDMENT. I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND. >> IT WAS -- UNDER COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, 4.2, YOU CAN SEE THAT I MADE IT NOTED THAT I MADE A COMMENT. THERE WAS SOMETHING MAYBE BETWEEN THE DIABLO WATER DISTRICT FOR THE WAY WE DO NOW IS THE IRON HOUSE SANITARY DISTRICT. IN FACT, IT WAS THE RANDALL --I DON'T KNOW WHY THE NAME WAS THE WAY IT IS -- BUT TO HAVE THE NAME DIRECTLY ON THE MINUTES, CORRECT AS WE SHOULD, IT IS RANDALL, R, A, N, D, A, L, L, HYPHEN BOLD WATER JAMIN PLANNED TO TAKE THE NAME OF THE IRON HOUSE SANITARY WATER DISTRICT COMMENTS. THAT SHOULD NOT BE IN THERE. THE RANDALL BOLD WATER TREATMENT PLANT WAS THE ONE IN ITS PLACE. >> WEBPAGES THIS ON? >> IT IS RIGHT UNDER ITEM NUMBER THREE, COUNCILMEMBER ACTIONS. ITEM 3, COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS. AS YOU GO DOWN THE ITEM, DR. FULLER COMMENTED THAT THE COUNSEL HAD THE JOINT MEETING WITH IRON HOUSE SANITARY DISTRICT AND DIABLO WATER DISTRICT THAT THE COUNCIL --THE DIRECTORS OF THE JOINT -- OF THE IRON DIABLO WATER DISTRICT -- >> DO YOU HAVE A PAGE NUMBER? THANK YOU. >> IT IS PAGE 23 OF THE FULL AGENDA. >> I HAVE IT. IT IS ONE, TWO, THE THIRD PAGE , MIDDLE OF THE PAGE, BLUE LETTERS, 3- COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, THEN THE FIRST AND SECOND LINE. >> AND YOU WANT TO ADD RANDALL BOLD IN THERE? >> NO. THEY DID NOT MEET WITH IRON HOUSE SANITARY DISTRICT. I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT ONE IS APPEARING IN THERE. THAT IS MY ERROR OR --THE NOTES WERE TAKEN WRONG --I COULDN'T REMEMBER THE DISTRICT. WHATEVER IT WAS, IF IT WAS ME, I APOLOGIZE. THAT SHOULD BE THE RANDALL, R, A, N, D, A, L, L, BOLD WATER TREATMENT DISTRICT. WHEN I READ IT, IT IS DIABLO WATER COUNCIL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS. NOT WITH THE IRON HOUSE DISTRICT. >> WE DID MEET WITH IRON HOUSE SANITARY DISTRICT IN DIABLO WATER DISTRICT AT MID BREAK REGIONAL PARK. >> YEAH. >> RANDALL BOLD IS THE WATER JAMIN PLANT OFF OF ROWLEY. >> YEAH. ALL RIGHT. >> >> I BELIEVE I WAS DOING COUNCILMEMBER --DOES DURING COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS, I BELIEVE RANDALL BOWLES WAS BROUGHT UP. WE WERE GETTING A REPORT REGARDING WHAT HAD TAKEN PLACE AT THE DEWD MEETING. BUT I AM NOT SEEING THAT. WHEN I SEE FOR HERE, UNDER THE MINUTES FOR COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, DOESN'T REFLECT -- I DON'T SEE THAT SAME THING. OKAY. >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? >> I GAVE A MOTION. >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND FOR THAT MOTION? >> NOT SEEING A SECOND, THE MOTION DIES. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY WHO WOULD LIKE TO MOVE 4.2? >> I MOVE APPROVAL OF 4.2. >> SECOND. >> ALL RIGHT, LIBBY, IF YOU WILL CALL THE ROLL CALL PLEASE. >> COUNCILMEMBER MEADOWS? >> AYE. >> DR. FULLER? >> NO. >> COUNCILMEMBER HENDERSON? >> YES. >> VICE-MAYOR SHAW? >> AYE. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> YES. >> THE ITEM PASSES 4-1. TAKE YOU. >> OKAY. AND I PULLED 4.6, NOT BECAUSE I WANT TO TRICK YOU INTO ANYTHING. I WOULD JUST LIKE FOR THE PUBLIC TO HEAR ALL THE PROJECT AND TO HEAR THE REPORT JUST IN CASE THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO GO LOOK THROUGH THE AGENDA PACKET. IF YOU COULD JUST GIVE A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF ALL THE GREAT WORK THAT'S HAPPENING, WHAT IS STILL TO COME AS BEST TO YOUR ABILITY. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR, VICE-MAYOR SHAW, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. WE HAVE A LOT OF EXCITING PROJECTS AS OUTLINED IN THE REPORT. OUR FUTURE PROJECTS ARE, BASICALLY, ON THE SIDE LAUREL ROAD. A SIDE NOTE -- I WILL HAVE A PRESENTATION TO MAKE LATER IN THE EVENING, REGARDING OUR AGREEMENT WITH THE HISTORY, THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDE PARTIAL PROJECTS ARE GOING TO GET UNDERWAY IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS HAS BEEN A MULTI-YOUR PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE BEEN WORKING , AND YOU WILL SEE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EAST SIDE ROAD FROM 9th AVENUE, EASTWARD DIRECTION , STARTING OVER THE NEXT 2 TO 3 YEARS, ALL THE WAY TO BETHEL ISLAND ROAD. THAT WOULD BE A BRAND-NEW ROADWAY, STANDARD CITY STREET WAY , FOR LANES, MEDIANS, SIDEWALKS, UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM, VERY FUNCTIONAL STREET WITH A NUMBER OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS IN ITS PATH. THAT IS A PROJECT THAT, AGAIN, SOME PARTS OF IT HAS BEEN ALREADY DESIGNED, AWARDED, CONTRACTED. THE REST ARE UNDER DESIGNED, SO THEN, WE WILL HEAR A LOT ABOUT EAST CYPRESS ROAD THE NEXT THREE YEARS. ARE OTHER IMPORTANT PROJECTS ARE THE LOWER ROADS NEAR THE SECTION WITH O'HARA. THIS PROJECT , AS THE COUNCIL KNOWS, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING FOR SEVERAL YEARS TO ACQUIRE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ANY REWARD FOR THE FAMILIES. RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS ACQUIRED, AND THAT PROJECT IS UNDER DESIGN CURRENTLY. THERE ARE SOME LARGE UTILITY POLES THAT WILL BE RELOCATED OVER THE NEXT TWO TO THREE MONTHS. AT YOUR JULY MEETING, I WILL PLAN TO PRESENT YOU A CONTRACT FOR AWARD OF INSTRUCTION, AND FOLLOWING UP ON YOUR APPROVAL, COME AUGUST, WE WOULD LIKE TO START A CONSTRUCTION ON THE ROAD. THIS BASICALLY COMPLETES THE CITY PART OF LAUREL ROAD FROM O'HARA TO BROOKE, ALSO O'HARA AVENUE FROM LAUREL ROAD, SOUTH, TO THE END OF THE VINEYARD, WHICH HAS BEEN KIND OF A BOTTLENECK FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. FINALLY , GET THAT PROJECT APPROVED. ONE THE BENEFIT OF LAUREL ROAD AND THE TIMING IS YOU HAVE SEEN, WE HAVE AN EXCITING DEPARTMENT IN OAKLEY, SHOPPING CENTER , AND O'HARA, OUR PROJECT, SAFEST PROJECT WOULD COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER, AND I THINK BOTH WOULD , THEY CAN UNDERSTAND, THEY WILL START CONSTRUCTION AFTER AUGUST, SEPTEMBER, AND WE WILL MOVE INTO THE NEW YEAR. SO, BUT IN THE END OF SUMMER OF NEXT YEAR, ALL OF THE OFF-SITE WORK ON LAUREL ROAD AND O'HARA, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, THE SAFEWAY PROJECT, YOU WILL SEE MANY CHANGE /IMPROVEMENT IN THAT AREA. AGAIN, THESE ARE OUR MAJOR PROJECTS. WE HAVE NUMBER OF SMALLER PROJECT. IT STILL IS, FROM ONE PERSPECTIVE, JUST AS IMPORTANT, MULTIMILLION DOLLAR PROJECT AS A PROJECT TO REPAIR AND REPLACE A LOT OF DAMAGED CONCRETE. YOU KNOW YOU HAVE THE CAR SHARE PROGRAM WHERE WE TRULY DO THE FULL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, AND WE SHARE THE COST, 50/50, WITH THE PERSPECTIVE PROPERTY OWNERS. THE PROJECT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. WE WILL BRING AN ACCEPTANCE REPORT TO YOU IN THE MONTH OF MAY. WE HAVE SOME OTHER SMALLER PROJECT AGAIN. CONTINUING TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODERNIZATION, AND ANOTHER SIX AREA, WE WILL BE BRINGING YOU CONTRACT AWARDED FOR THE HENRIQUE SCENE AUGUSTINE PARK , BRAND-NEW AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROSEN CARPENTER. IT WILL BE A BEAUTIFUL PARK. VERY DIVERSE AND VERY GOOD WATER FEATURE, PLAYGROUND, OPEN-SPACE , PICNIC AREA, SHADE STRUCTURE, AND A PARKING LOT. THAT PROJECT IS UNDER DESIGN RIGHT NOW. WE WILL SEE MORE OF IT AS A PART OF OUR FISCAL YEAR '24-'25 BUDGET PROCESS. AGAIN, OUR PLAN IS TO MAKE A CONTRACT FOR OUR BOARD TO FOLLOW. AGAIN, WE ARE ADDRESSING A NUMBER OF THINGS IN THE COMMUNITY , NEEDS FROM FACILITIES TO PARKS, STREETS, AND ALL PARKS IN BETWEEN. WE'RE VERY ACTIVE AND BUSY ON MULTIPLE FRONTS. >> GREAT. THANK YOU. ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I WILL MOVE APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM THEN. >> SECOND. >> ARE. WE HAVE A FIRST AND SECOND. >> ARE WE APPROVING OR ACCEPTING? >> ACCEPTING. DID YOU HEAR ME, COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? ACCEPTING? >> YES. THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. WILL YOU CALL THE ROLL CALL? >> COUNCILMEMBER MEADOWS. >> AYE. >> DR. FULLER? >> AYE. >> END HENDERSON? >> AYE. >> VICE-MAYOR SHAW? >> AYE. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> YES. >> ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >> WE ARE MOVING ON TO ITEM FIVE, PUBLIC HEARINGS. THERE ARE NONE. WE ARE MOVING ON TO ITEM 6, REGULAR CALENDAR. THIS IS 6.1, TO APPROVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 10-34, SB-1034 REGARDING A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORD ACT RESPONSE EXTENSION DURING A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY. THIS WILL BE PRESENTED BY OUR CITY CLERK, LIBBY VREONIS. >> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 1034 SPONSORED BY SENATOR 'S PALM SPRINGS CHINO HILLS, TEMECULA REGION WITH SEYARTO. THE CITY CLERK IN THE HILLS AND FOR CALIFORNIA CLERKS IN FEBRUARY SAID THAT THE CITY PROPOSED THE BILL AND SENATOR SEYARTO AGREED TO SPONSOR IT. THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUIRES GOVERNMENT RECORDS TO BE DISCLOSED UPON REQUEST UNLESS AN ENGINE WITH EVENT DISCLOSURE. IN GENERAL, A GOVERNMENT AGENCY HAS 10 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF A RECORDS REQUEST TO DETERMINE IF RESPONSIVE RECORDS EXIST, AND THEY MAY BE DISPOSED AND TO NOTIFY THE REQUESTER OF SUCH. THE AGENCY DOES NOT HAVE TO PRODUCE THE RECORDS DURING THAT TIME. HE NEEDS TO PROVIDE THE REQUESTER WITH A REASONABLE TIME AND THE RECORDS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE THEN. THE 14-DAY EXTENSION IS ALLOWED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION AND RESPOND TO A REQUEST FOR WENDY UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST. UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES INCLUDE TO COLLECT RECORDS FROM FACILITIES SEPARATE FROM THE OFFICE PROCESSING THE REQUEST TO COLLECT THE LUMINOUS AMOUNT OF DISTINCT AND SEPARATE RECORDS IN A SINGLE REQUEST, TO CONSULT WITH ANOTHER AGENCY WITH A SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE REQUEST, AND TO COMPILE DATA REQUIRING PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT A COMPUTER REPORT. SB-1034 WOULD EXPAND UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES INCLUDE THE NEED TO SEARCH FOR, COLLECT, PROPERLY EXAMINE AND COPY RECORDS DURING A STATE OF EMERGENCY PROCLAIMED BY THE GOVERNOR FROM THE STATE OF EMERGENCY AFFECTING THE AGENCY'S ABILITY TO TIMELY RESPOND TO REQUESTS DUE TO DECREASED STAFFING OR CLOSURE OF THE AGENCY'S FACILITIES. LEGISLATIVE COMMENTS INDICATE THAT THE PROPOSED BILL TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION A SITUATION SUCH AS THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. THE CURRENT LEGISLATION FOR THE 14-DAY EXTENSION FOR UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES DOES NOT CAPTURE THIS TYPE OF SITUATION. AS EXPERIENCE WITH MANY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND OTHER ILLNESSES, THERE WAS DECREASED STAFFING IN OFFICE MONITORING DURING THE PANDEMIC.THIS TYPE OF SITUATION CAN CREATE DIFFICULTY IN COLLECTING, EXAMINING, AND RESPONDING TO REQUESTS WITHIN A 10-DAY PERIOD. THEREFORE, THE 14-DAY EXTENSION WOULD PROVIDE MORE TIME FOR AGENCIES TO RESPOND. KELSEY HAS HOSTED THE CITY CLERK LEGISLATIVE MEETING ON MARCH 7th, DURING WHICH THIS PROPOSED BILL WAS DISCUSSED CAL CITY'S POSITION AT THAT TIME WAS PENDING. HOWEVER, IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT ITS POSITION WILL BE MOVING TO A SUPPORT POSITION SOON. THERE ARE SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES SET FORTH IN THE GOVERNMENT CODE TO PROCLAIM A STATE OF EMERGENCY. WHILE TYPICALLY, THESE CIRCUMSTANCES MIGHT INCLUDE A ENDEMIC OR FIRE, OR FLOOD, CYBER ATTACKS ARE ALSO A CONCERN IS THE CITY OF OAKLAND WHEN ASKED IN FEBRUARY. THROUGH COMMUNICATION WITH THE CITY OF CHINO HILLS AND OF MEDICATION WITH SENATOR SEYARTO'S OFFICE, STAFF INQUIRED FOR THE AMENDMENT THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED TO THE PROPOSED BILL TO ALSO INCLUDE A LOCAL AGENCY DECLARING A STATE OF EMERGENCY, SUCH AS DURING A CYBER ATTACK. WHILE THE AMENDMENT WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED WITH THIS BILL, IT IS ON THE RADAR AND SOMETHING WE MAY WISH TO WATCH FOR IN UPCOMING YEARS. THE PROPOSED BILL AS WRITTEN IS A GOOD STEP FORWARD TO ALLOW AGENCIES ADEQUATE RESPONSE TIME DURING A STATE OF EMERGENCY TO RESPOND TO RECORD REQUESTS. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE LETTER OF SUPPORT. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT, AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL? COUNCILMEMBER FULLER, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? >> I WILL HAVE COMMENTS DURING DISCUSSION. I DON'T WANT TO ALL OF THE IS NOT REALLY A QUESTION -- >> OKAY THIS IS THE TIME WHERE YOU CAN MAKE ANY OF YOUR COMMENTS OR DISCUSSIONS. >> OKAY. WELL, IN THAT CASE, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED BEFORE, THE JURISDICTIONS IN THE STATE, THAT THE STATE REIMBURSE US FOR THE COST OF THE PRA REQUESTS, AND THEN THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH. I THINK PRA, PUBLIC RECORDS, AND REQUEST, THEY HAVEN'T LINE PEOPLE WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND FACILITATED THE PRESS FOR ACCURATE REPORTING. I KNOW I HAVE USED THEM. WE HAVE A GREAT CITY CLERK, AND THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RESPONSE VERY ACCURATELY, GRACIOUSLY, AND AS THE SITUATION COMES, THE STATE EDITED PROGRAMS, I THINK IT IS A GOOD PROGRAM, BUT I THINK -- ESPECIALLY THE WAY IT IS GOING IN OUR POST-PANDEMIC TIMES, THE STATE ACCEPTS THE COST FOR WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE CITY CLERK AT THE LOCAL LEVEL TO RETRIEVE THESE DOCUMENTS. ESSENTIALLY, THIS IS NOT --BUT IT IS A COST THAT WE ENCUMBER. I DO AGREE WITH WHAT IS GOING ON. I AGREE WITH IT, BUT I THINK WE HAVE TO TWEAK IT AND SAY THAT THE STATE, WHEN PASSING THIS AMENDMENT, SHOULD INCUR THE COST FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO ABIDE BY IT . THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION? OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION? >> I WILL MOVE IT WITH THE CAVEAT ABOUT INCURRING THE COST. >> I'M NOT SEEING A SECOND FOR THAT MOTION. I HAVE AN ALTERNATE MOTION? >> I MOVE THAT WE --I MOVED TO APPROVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 1034 AS RESENTED. >> DO I HAVE A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND. CAN YOU CONDUCT A ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE? >> COUNCILMEMBER METALS? >> AYE. >> DR. FULLER? >> AYE. >> COUNCILMEMBER HENDERSON? >> AYE. >> VICE-MAYOR SHOT? >> YES. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> YES. >> THE ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >> ALL RIGHT.MOVING ONTO ITEM 6.2, ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT FOR THE CANAL UNDERGROUND PROJECT, SEGMENT JERSEY ELLAND ROAD, ASSOCIATE WITH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NUMBER, 5A, 300 TEMPER THIS IS PRESENTED BY KEVIN OH HONEY, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SLASH CITY ENGINEER. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS, VICE-MAYOR SHOT, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, MAY I PLEASE PRESENT YOU THIS REPORT, WHICH IS CALLING FOR ONGOING CONVERSATION FOR THE WORK STAFF HAS BEEN DOING ON EAST CYPRESS ROAD PROJECT. SINCE MID DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR, THE CITY OFFICIALLY TOOK OVER THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF EAST CYPRESS ROAD FROM THE DEVELOPER OF GRANT PROJECT, STAFF HAS BEEN ACTIVELY WORKING TO PUT THE DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE PROJECT TOGETHER , AND MOVING FORWARD. RESULT OF OUR WORK , IN FEBRUARY --LAST FEBRUARY --WE BROUGHT YOU A CONTRACT FOR COMPLETING THE DESIGN OF THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD AT THE CONTRA COSTA CANAL WIDENING, AT THE JERSEY ISLAND. THIS IS A VERY COMPLEX PART OF THIS ROADWAY. IN ADDITION TO MULTIPLE UTILITIES THAT ARE CRISSCROSSING THE INTERSECTION, THEY HAVE THE CONTRA COSTA CANAL. AGAIN, JUST ANOTHER LEVEL OF PERPLEXITY, PLUS ALL THE ROADWAY. SO, WITH THAT, WE CONTINUE TO WORK ON THE PROJECT OVER THE LAST MONTH. ACTUALLY, THE PAST MANY MONTHS, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING , WE HAVE KIND OF REACHED AN AGREEMENT WITH OUR PARTNER OF THE WATER DISTRICT, REGARDING THE UNDERGROUND OF THE CANAL AT THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD. AS YOU HAVE SEEN, THIS IS CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT THAT HAS BEEN UNDERGROUND ON THE OPEN CANAL ALL THE WAY BEHIND CYPRESS GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD , DELANEY PARK, AND IT IS ALMOST TO THE NORTH OF THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD. LAST YEAR, THE CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT IS UNDERGROUND ALSO FOR THE LARGE WATER AREAS OF SOUTH CYPRESS ROAD ALL THE WAY TO THROUGH. THIS, PROJECT, BASICALLY COMPLETE THE UNDERGROUND OF THIS PROJECT. IT INVOLVES CLOSE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE WATER DISTRICT. AGAIN, WE HAVE HAD GREAT COLLABORATION WITH OUR COLLEAGUES AT THE CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT, RESULTING IN THIS AGREEMENT, WHERE BOTH AGENCIES, AS A LEAD AGENCY, WILL UNDERTAKE THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT AN OF THE PROJECT, AND TAKE CARE OF ALL THE RELATED WATER. CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT HAS AGREED TO REIMBURSE THE CITY TO THIS.2 MILLION, THE COST FOR UNDERGROUND OF THE PIPE, THE CANAL INTO THE PIPE, UNDER THE ROADWAY, WHICH WOULD THEN COVER ALL ASSORTMENT OF UTILITIES ON TOP, GROUND IT ACROSS THE ROADWAY. THIS EVENING, FIRST OFF, I WANT TO, AGAIN, ACKNOWLEDGE THE GREAT WORK, COLLABORATION WE HAVE DONE WITH THE CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT TONIGHT. MR. MICKEY, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER WATER DISTRICT, HE IS HERE, JOINING US JUST IN CASE COUNCIL HAS ANY QUESTION. THIS AGREEMENT THAT IS PRESENTED TO YOU FOR APPROVAL IS PRESENTED TO THE WATER DISTRICT BOARD NEXT WEEK FOR THEIR APPROVAL. AGAIN, THIS HAS BEEN A VERY COLLABORATIVE PROCESS. WE CERTAINLY INTEND TO CONTINUE WORK WITH OUR COLLEAGUES ON THIS PROJECT. AGAIN, THIS IS EXTREMELY COMPLEX PROJECT , BUT WE WILL SEE THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT TAKE PLACE THIS YEAR, AND WE WILL START THE CONSTRUCTION OUT OF THAT SOMETIMES EARLY NEXT YEAR, AND GO ON INTO THE FOLLOWING YEAR. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL HAVE QUESTIONS? COUNCILMEMBER FULLER, ANY QUESTIONS ON THE PHONE? >> NO. >> I HAVE ONE FOLLOW-UP QUESTION. WITH THIS ROAD COMPLETION BE ABLE TO HAPPEN WITHOUT THE UNDERGROUND OF THIS CANAL? >> THE ROAD COMPLETION CAN BE, BUT NOT REALLY, BECAUSE THE CANAL STILL HAS TO BE ADDRESSED. RIGHT NOW, THE ONLY SECTION OF THIS CANAL THAT HAS NOT BEEN UNDERGROUND IS AT THE EAST CYPRESS ROAD CROSSING. IF YOU DRIVE THROUGH THE CROSSING TO THE RIGHT, YOU KIND OF SEE AN OPEN POOL. MOVED TO THE LEFT, ANOTHER OPEN POOL. THE PIPE SEVEN UNDERGROUND TO BOTH THE NORTH AND SOUTH, AND NOW WE HAVE THE KIND OF CLOSE THE GAP, INSTALL THE PIPES, BUT THE ROADWAY ON TOP OF. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL? ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE CAN START COMMENTS, DISCUSSIONS FROM THE COUNCIL, OR I CAN TAKE A MOTION. >> I MOVE APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. >> SECOND. >> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND. IF MS. VARONA'S WITH A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? >> COUNCILMEMBER METALS? >> AYE. >> DR. FULLER? >> AYE. >> COUNCILMEMBER HENDERSON? >> AYE. >> VICE-MAYOR SHOT? >> AYE. >> MAYOR WILLIAMS? >> AYE. >> ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. >> ALL RIGHT. MOVING ONTO ITEM 7, REPORTS. FIRST ONE WILL BE 7.1. OUR CITY MANAGER. >> GOOD EVENING, MID-AMERICAN MADAME VICE-MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. WANTED TO BRING ATTENTION TO A COMMUNITY EVENT HAPPENING THIS SATURDAY, 10:00:02 A.M. TO 1:00:02 P.M. HOPEFULLY IT DOESN'T RAIN. LOOKS LIKE YOU MIGHT BE RAIN IN THE FORECAST. IF THERE IS, ANOTHER RECREATION TEAM IS PLANNING FOR AN ALTERNATIVE, I BELIEVE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ALSO, WANTED TO BRING ATTENTION TO OUR 25th ANNIVERSARY FROM 4:00:02 P.M. TO 10:00:02 P.M. AND ALSO WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT, AS THE MEETING STARTED WITH UPDATE FROM THE OAKLEY LIBRARIAN TO MAKE MORE PROGRESS ON THE OAKLEY LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY PROJECT. WE HAD THE SECOND STAKEHOLDER MEETING THAT HAPPENED LAST WEEK. REALLY, PRODUCTIVE MEETING, AND AS A RESULT OF THAT, IN THE EFFORT BEING MADE ON THAT FRONT, BOTH THE CITY WEBSITE HAS BEEN UPDATED, THE HOME PAGE INCLUDES A LINK TO OUR DIVISION OAKLEY SITE, WE CAN ACCESS INFORMATION ABOUT THE CITY PROJECT, BUT IT ALSO LINKS YOU TO THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLEY LIBRARY. THEY HAVE ALSO HAD THAT UPDATED WITH THIS PROJECT, AND THEY HAVE STARTED KICKING OFF THE FUNDRAISING EFFORT, WHICH WILL START RAMPING UP PRETTY QUICKLY OVER THE NEXT FEW WEEKS , THROUGHOUT THIS CALENDAR YEAR. SO, THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT, AND YOU WILL NOTE ITEM B IS THE BUSINESS LICENSE UPDATE ON THE LIST FOR BUSINESS LICENSES FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. ITEM 7.2 A, REPORT FROM COUNSEL LIAISONS TO REGIONAL COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL, OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE OAKLEY REDIRECTION AGENCY. COUNCILMEMBER METALS? >> LAST THURSDAY, I ATTENDED CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING. THE PRESENTATION WAS ON WHAT A GREAT SERVICE OF THE LOCATIONS TO THE WEST, COUNCILMEMBER COUNTY, TWO IN HERCULES, PITTSBURGH/ANTIOCH. NOT ALL FOR MAYBE. >> WE HAD A PRESENTATION. >> THAT IS IT? >> VICE-MAYOR SHOT? >> I ATTENDED THE TRANSIT, AND I WILL LET MAYOR WILLIAMS REPORT ON THAT. ATTENDED THE LIBRARY SOME COMMITTEE MEETING, BUT MR. McMURRAY ALREADY REPORTED ON THAT. DID THE RIBBON-CUTTING ON LAST FRIDAY. >> COUNCILMEMBER HENDERSON? >> LAST TUESDAY NIGHT, ON THE SECOND, I ATTENDED OUR ANNOUNCED SANITATION DISTRICT. THEY'RE WORKING ON PUBLIC EDUCATION, WE'LL BE SEEING MORE OF THE COMMUNITY, FROM THEM, ON THAT. THURSDAY, THE 4th, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HELD THEIR CONSORTIUM ON THE NEEDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. THAT MEETING WAS VERY INFORMATIVE. FRIDAY THE 4th, I ATTENDED THE RIBBON-CUTTING AND IT IS EXCITING TO HAVE THAT BUSINESS IN TOWN. OF COURSE, FRIDAY NIGHT, WE HAD FOR TONIGHT'S LIGHTS, LOCAL FOOD EVENT . THANK YOU. >> COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? >> YES. FIRST OFF, THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENT , OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH A-BACK AND OTHERS -- ARE IN FULL FORCE TO GET THE 10 BILLION OR 20 MILLION OF HIS BILLION -- DOLLAR REGIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING BOND ISSUE ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT. I THINK THE NEXT REPORT IS AUGUST 2nd. I WILL HAVE MORE WHEN I RETURN AFTER QUICKLY PROCESSING ONE OF THE DISTURBING ASPECTS, THAT THEY SEEM TO HAVE A BOUNCING BOLT. THEY DON'T HAVE A SET --10 MILLION OR 20 BILLION -- WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO GO FOR FOR THE REGIONAL ONE --WHICH IS, OF COURSE, FOR NINE COUNTIES. IT IS GOING TO IMPACT ON THE RESIDENTS' PROPERTY TAX. WITH THAT, A.D.-16-57, COMING ALONG JUST FINE. THAT IS SPONSORED BY A SIMILAR NUMBER BUCKY WICKS, WHO, BARELY, WILL TAKE THE LEAD FOR THE DEMOCRATS IN TERMS OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SHE IS NOW TOYING WITH MORE MEASURES TO COME, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT FRIGHTENING, BECAUSE MARILYN FROM BERKELEY WILL BE JOINING HER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LEGISLATURE FROM THE STATE SENATE FLOOR. SO, I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT IS GOING TO GO ON. WE'LL JUST HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE. SO, I WILL HAVE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THAT BY THE NEXT MEETING . MORE DETAILED INFORMATION. JUST BE AWARE, THE REGIONAL BOND ISSUE --THEY'RE COMBINED TOGETHER, THEY'RE REGIONAL. COMMITTEE NOW, THEY'RE MOVING FORWARD AS A REGION, AND NOW, STATE SENATE OFFICE SOON TO BE STATE CENTER -- ARAVINE ENDORSED BY "THE CHRONICLE " AND "EAST BAY TIMES" BECAUSE HE BRINGS SO MANY REGIONS TOGETHER. SO, I WILL HAVE THE REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEMS. >> ALL RIGHT. FOR MY REPORTS, I ATTENDED TRIED ALSO TRANSIT. WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT SB-1021, A MEASURE THAT COULD APPEAR IN 2026. MTC IS THE MAIN DRIVER ABOUT IT, ALL ABOUT REGIONAL RISING TRANSPORTATION. FOR THOSE FAMILIAR WITH EAST COUNTY, TRY TO THE TRANSIT WAS STARTED BECAUSE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DID --IT DIDN'T WORK TO DO THE BIGGER, CENTRALIZED TRANSPORTATION OUT HERE. OUR NEEDS WEREN'T BEING MET. SO, MTC COULD CHOOSE TO DO THEIR ANALYZATION OF ALL THE DIFFERENT THINGS. THEY COULD DO THE DIFFERENT SALES TAX, A ROLL CALL OR OTHER MEANS FOR FUNDS, INCLUDING BOND MEASURES. THIS WOULD GIVE CONTROL FOR MTC OVER THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE FUNDS, WHICH COULD BE RELOCATED TO THE URBAN CORE. THAT DOES HAPPEN EVEN IF THE VOTERS DO NOT AGREE WITH THE BOND MEASURE. SO, TRY DELTA, ALONG WITH OTHER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, OR ACTIVELY OPPOSING THAT, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THAT IS KIND OF TAKING CONTROL AWAY FROM THE VOTERS, WHERE THE MONEY WILL BE SPENT. WE DID GET A PRESENTATION . WE RECEIVED TWO DRIVERS THAT GOT AWARDED SAFE DRIVING DUE TO A COUPLE ACCIDENTS, OR NEAR-ACCIDENTS THAT HAPPENED. THE DRIVER OF THE BUS STRUCK BY THE RED LIGHT RUNNER IN ANTIOCH OF LAUREL WAS ONE OF THEM. JUST THE DAY BEFORE, THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT THAT A DRIVER MANAGED TO AVOID ANOTHER RED LIGHT RUNNER. THE PASSENGERS IMPACTED WERE THERE TO HONOR THE DRIVER, AND EVERYONE WAS CRYING. DRIVER, EVERYBODY. WE ATTENDED THE LIBRARY STAKEHOLDERS MEETING. OUR FABULOUS CITY MANAGERS, GLORY FOR THAT. SO, THE MAYOR'S CONFERENCE. SOCON THE PROGRAM WE RECEIVED WAS ON STORMWATER FUNDING OPTIONS. WE DID A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT --THERE'S A MUNICIPAL REGIONAL STORMWATER PERMIT IS ISSUED EVERY FIVE YEARS. EACH REISSUE OF THESE PERMITS ARE MORE COSTLY AND STRINGENT THAN THE PRIOR PERMITS. EVERY CITY AND TOWN IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY IS A COPER MANY ON THESE PERMITS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF BRENTWOOD AND RICHMOND. THEY'RE PAYING PERMITS ON THEIR OWN OR OUTSIDE OF THAT. THE NEW PERMIT PROVISIONS --THE OLD PERMITS ONLY HAD 10 PROVISIONS WHEN THEY WERE FIRST -- WHEN THEY FIRST BEGAN. TODAY, IT HAS 21. AND SO, THE SPEAKERS WERE TALKING ABOUT THE IMPACTS TO MUNICIPALITIES WITH THESE NEW PROVISIONS . ONE OF THEM HAS TO DO WITH AN SHELTERED HOMELESS PUBLISHERS WHICH I KNOW IS AN POPULAR RIGHT NOW, DISABILITIES ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MAP OF WHERE THE PUBLISHERS ARE LOCATED AND CREATE PLANS FOR TREATING STORMWATER RUNOFF. SO, THAT GETS COMP DID WHEN WE HAVE SHARED JURISDICTIONS WITH CALTRAN, WATER DISTRICT, ORDERS ON ALL OF THE OTHERS. THERE'S SOME APPLICATIONS THERE. STARTING IN JULY, CITIES ONLY TO DOCUMENT THE IMPLEMENTATION COSTS. RIGHT NOW, THERE'S A $45 MILLION DEFICIT FROM THESE UNFUNDED MANDATES. SO, THE CITIES AND COUNTIES NEED A WAY TO FUND THE LARGE DEFICIT. THEY'RE REVIEWING FUNDING OPTIONS, AND THE FUNDING SHORTFALL WILL ONLY INCREASE, POTENTIALLY, WE COULD BE EXPOSED TO THIRD PARTY LAWSUIT DUE TO NONCOMPLIANCE. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, CALTRANS WAS ISSUED A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER BY THE BOARD WITH THE TRASH THAT CAUSES STORM ISSUES. IT WAS A VERY LONG PRESENTATION. HOPEFULLY, WE'LL GET MORE THOUGH AT THE CITY LEVEL AS WE GET MORE IDEAS ABOUT WHAT DIFFERENT WAYS WE CAN COME UP WITH PROTECTING US FROM THAT SHORTFALL. I WAS APPOINTED TO THE DELTA PROTECTION COMMISSION, WHICH IS AN IMPORTANT SEAT, I THINK, WITH EVERYTHING WE'RE TRYING TO DO. SO, I WAS VERY HAPPY TO GET THAT APPOINTMENT. THERE OF THIS WHEEL IS OFFERED AN ENDORSEMENT FOR THE LIBRARY COMMISSION THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. WE ALSO HEARD ABOUT A LEGACY AWARD FOR INNOVATION FOR CCTA. ON EARTH DAY, AT OAKLEY BIG BREAK, THERE'S GOING TO BE A VEGETATION MANAGEMENT EVENT THAT YOU CAN PUT HIS FEET IN FROM CLOCK A.M. TO :00. WE ALSO GOT A REPORT ON APRIL 18th FOR THE NEXT BIG AVAG --I, 18 IS THE NEXT BIG LIP IS NO, APRIL 18th IS THE NEXT BIG BOAT FOR THEIR BAFA. I WILL BE SENDING TO WATCH. I THINK IT WAS IT FOR MY REPORTS. AND, FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, ITEM 7.2 B--ANYBODY UP YOU HAVE A REQUEST? ALL RIGHT. SOUNDED LIKE COUNCILMEMBER FULLER HAS ONE . >> ACTUALLY, I HAVE TWO. FIRST ONE 'S OFFICE IF THIS IS CORRECT -- COACHING LARGE COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. IT DECIMATES THE RECREATION, WATERWAYS, LAND, NATIONAL PARKS. AS SUCH, I WOULD LIKE TO DRAFT A LETTER TO THE PARKLAND HEALTH FISH AND WILDLIFE TO NOTIFY THEM OF OUR PREDICAMENT. ONE OF THE THINGS I UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE RIVERS IS THAT THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S ALSO HAVE A CENTER OF PRODUCTION AS WELL IS THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD. THE FACT THEY HAVE BEEN WITH US TO ALL THREE OF THEM --SOME RECURRING IN OUR RIVERWAYS -- JOINING OUR CITY. FOR THAT TO BE AN AGENDA ITEM, FIRST, THAT I HAVE A SECOND ONE. WE'LL BE ON THAT ONE. >> WOULD WE NEED , LIKE, A WORK SESSION, OR IS IT POSSIBLE TO DRAFT SOMETHING TO PRESENT TO US? I'M JUST ASKING FOR CLARITY ON ALL OF THE SHOULD WE BRING HER BACK IS A DISCUSSION ITEM IF SOMEBODY SECONDS IT, OR IS THERE ENOUGH INFORMATION THAT WE CAN GET LETTERS DRAFTED, THEN WE COULD DISCUSS THOSE? >> I THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO PROPOSE A DRAFT LETTER AND ASK THAT TO BE APPROVED, THEN SENT OR MODIFIED. >> OKAY.TRAN09 FULLER, WILL THAT GET TO WHAT YOU ARE REQUESTING? >> YES. THAT IS FINE. YES. I AGREE. I WOULD LIKE IT, BUT MAYBE MR. McMURRAY ALREADY HAS THIS ENTERED --BUT IN REGARDS TO THE SACRAMENTO AND SAN JOAQUIN RIVERS, THE ADJOINING WATERWAYS, IT COULD BE RESEARCHED WHO --I AM SURE -- MAYBE THE FISH AND WILDLIFE -- BUT FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, COAST GUARD SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THAT THEY GET THE SAME LETTER ADDRESSED TO THREE DIFFERENT ENTITIES. I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE OR NOT, BUT THE FISH AND WILDLIFE, FOR SURE . >> YES. WE COULD DO THAT RESEARCH AND HAVE IT AVAILABLE TO BRING THAT BACK. >> PERFECT. I WOULD SECOND THAT. >> GREAT. >> IF I MAY JUST ADD EAST REGIONAL PARKS, BECAUSE I BELIEVE THEY HAVE JURISDICTION OVER IT, THE PATHWAY THERE. >> WHAT? I AGREE WITH THAT. AS WELL. >> DO YOU HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION NOW? OKAY. PERFECT. WHAT IS YOUR SECOND ITEM, COUNCILMEMBER FULLER? >> YES. I WOULD LIKE TO DRAFT A LETTER TO OUR STATE LEGISLATURES TO REVOKE OR RESCIND -- HOWEVER WE WOULD WORD IT -- THE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES DOING THEIR THING. THAT IS THE ONE WHERE, IF YOU STEAL SOMETHING, GOING TO SOME OF HIS HOUSE AND STEAL SOMETHING -- AS I UNDERSTAND IT, YOU WILL DO PRISON TIME, THE TIME AND COUNTY JAIL. UNFORTUNATELY, THE COUNTY JAIL DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE BASICALLY, NOBODY IS SERVING ANY TIME AT ALL, IN TERMS OF OUR RETAIL THEFTS, BURGLARIES, OTHER SUCH ITEMS SO, I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS WHETHER TO ENCOURAGE LEGISLATORS TO WORK ON REVOKING THAT ITEM, OR REPLACING THAT ITEM, OR SOMETHING THAT WILL HOLD PEOPLE DOING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM THE RETAIL INDUSTRY, ENTERING HOMES, HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR SOME SORT OF JUSTICE MECHANISM, SO TO SPEAK. A VIABLE JUSTICE SYSTEM. >> OKAY. I KNOW THAT THERE'S --I THINK -- 247 BUILD RIGHT NOW THAT ARE RELATING TO FIXING, CHANGING, AMENDING, GUIDING PROP 47, WHICH I THINK OUR VICE-MAYOR HAS SAT ON MANY OF THE POLICY COMMITTEES. >> YEAH. >> DISCUSSING THOSE. >> AND A LOT OF LEGISLATORS AREN'T LOOKING TO REPEAL IT, REVERSE IT, BUT THERE IS A LOT OUT THERE TO MAKE SOME AMENDMENT TO IT. SO, I WOULD BE FINE IF THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE CAN START A DRAFT LETTER TO KIND OF SEE WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, AND ABOUT OUR POSITION ON IT, YOU KNOW, ABOUT SUPPORTING SOME SORT OF AMENDMENT CHANGES. >> SPECIFIC TO PROP 47? >> YES. >> JUST WANT TO CLARIFY. >> YES. SPECIFIC TO PROP -- >> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. 8.1, WORK SESSIONS' REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. THIS WILL BE PRESENTED BY OUR CITY ATTORNEY, THERE ARE GOLD. >> THANK YOU, MADAME CHAIR. NUMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, THIS ITEM COMES BACK AT YOUR REQUEST. WHAT IS INCLUDED HERE IS A DRAFT ORDINANCE. WE'RE NOT STARTING THE OFFICIAL ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION PROCESS, BECAUSE I FELT LIKE I WANTED TO TAKE THE TEMPERATURE READ AND SEE IF WHAT I HAVE DONE IS WHAT YOU ASKED FOR, AND IF NOT, THEN I HAVE TIME TO DEVELOP SOMETHING THAT WAS CONSISTENT WITH YOUR REQUEST, BUT THIS WAS AN ITEM THAT YOU REQUESTED. WE LOOKED AT SEVERAL DIFFERENT SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES, AND FOR SAKE OF DEFINITION, THE CITY AND PD HAVE THEIR OWN SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES. THESE ARE OFFICIAL CITY POLICIES. WHAT WE UNDERSTOOD IS THAT THE COUNCIL WANTED TO SEE THAT IF THERE WAS SOME POLICY THAT WOULD GOVERN ITSELF, GOVERN THEIR OWN SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS. THE DIFFERENCE, WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IS THAT YOU ALL HAVE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, JUST LIKE THE AVERAGE CITIZEN. YOU DO NOT FORFEIT YOUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FREE EXPRESSION JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. IN FACT, YOU HAVE THE SAME FREE EXPRESSION RIGHTS, AS DOES ANY PERSON IN THIS CITY, EVEN A PERSON WHO IS NOT ELECTED. SO, THE ISSUE THAT WE HAVE IS THAT WE CANNOT DO SOMETHING THAT IS CALLED A PRIOR RESTRAINT. PRIOR RESTRAINT IS A TERM OF OUR FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE THAT BASICALLY SAYS, GOVERNMENT CAN'T, GENERALLY, TELL YOU, IN ADVANCE, THAT YOU CAN'T SAY SOMETHING AND CAN'T IMPOSE CONSEQUENCES IN ADVANCE. WE CANNOT COMPEL YOU NOT TO SPEAK. THERE ARE SOME SLIGHT EXCEPTIONS TO THAT THAT ARE REALLY NOT RELEVANT, BUT THE POINT HERE IS THAT THERE REALLY IS NO WAY FOR US, AS A CITY, TO ADOPT SOME POLICY --WHETHER IT IS A RESOLUTION OR A CODIFIED ORDINANCE THAT HAS SOME TEETH, SOME ENFORCEMENT POWER TO STOP YOU FROM SAYING CERTAIN THINGS ON SOCIAL MEDIA. I THINK MOST OF YOU PROBABLY THINK THAT IS A GOOD THING, BECAUSE, OBVIOUSLY, RULES, STOPPING SPEECH FROM HAPPENING, THEY ARE GENERALLY NOT A GOOD THING, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES IF PEOPLE SAY THINGS, AND I HAVE PROVIDED A COPY OF MOST RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISION THAT WAS DECIDED THIS TERM AS A CAVEAT. YOU ARE PROBABLY CAN, WELL, CITY ATTORNEY, IT IS YOUR JOB TO DESCRIBE THESE COURT CASES. DON'T JUST GIVE THEM TO US. WHY DON'T YOU SUMMARIZE THEM? ORDINARILY, I WOULD DO THAT, BUT I THINK THIS WAS A VERY WELL-WRITTEN OPINION , AND I THINK IF YOU READ THE OPINION, YOU WILL SEE JUST HOW NUANCED IT IS, BUT BASICALLY, IN A 9-0 DECISION, THE SUPREME COURT SAID THAT, IN SOME CASES, IF AN ELECTED OFFICIAL USES SOCIAL MEDIA TO COMMUNICATE, HE OR SHE MAY BE ENGAGING IN GOVERNMENT SPEECH , OR STATE ACTION, AND MAY THEREFORE BE LIABLE IF THEY DO SUCH A THING AS BLOCK SOMEBODY ON THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA, OR REMOVE A COMMENT, OR TAKE SOME ADVERSE ACTION THAT ONE OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ALLOWS. AND AGAIN, THE REASON I PROVIDED THE COURT CASE IS BECAUSE, IF YOU READ IT, IT REALLY MEANS THAT THERE IS NO CLEAR OR BRIGHT-LINE RULE -- LIKE NOTHING THAT IS BLACK AND WHITE --THAT I CAN SAY, IF YOU DO X, Y AND Z, YOU WILL CROSS THE LINE. IF YOU DON'T DO X, Y AND Z, YOU WON'T CROSS THE LINE. IT REALLY COMES DOWN TO -- IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE FACTS KIND OF QUESTION. SO, WHAT WE HAVE TRIED TO DO IS, WORKING WITHIN THOSE CONFINES -- WHICH IS WE CAN'T TELL THE COUNCILMEMBERS OPUS WHETHER IT IS YOU OR ANY FUTURE COUNCILMEMBERS --WHAT YOU CAN AND CAN'T SAY IN ADVANCE --WE CAN ALSO MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE SEQUENCES IN LIGHT OF THE NEW SUPREME COURT CASE IF CERTAIN THINGS ARE DONE. IF YOU ENGAGE IN ROBUST COMMUNICATIONS ON YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA ABOUT MATTERS THAT ARE INVOLVED IN CITY GOVERNMENT THAT MAY COME BEFORE YOU -- OR ACTUALLY WILL COME BEFORE YOU --ONE AS YOU MAYBE CREATING A PUBLIC RECORD. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE FEEL, YOU KNOW, YOU SHOULD KNOW. I THINK ALL OF YOU PROBABLY DO KNOW THAT. ANOTHER THING IS THAT YOU MAYBE CREATING WHAT IS CALLED A LIMITED PURPOSE PUBLIC FORM, AND IF PEOPLE ARE ATTRACTED TO THAT, YOU MAY BE CREATING A FORM THAT, BY LAW, CANNOT BE RESTRICTED. SO, IF YOU UNDERTAKE THE ADVERSE ACTIONS LIKE BLOCKING SOMEONE, YOU KNOW, DENYING THEIR COMMENTS OPUS 99 THEIR COMMENTS -- BUT PULLING THEIR COMMENTS BACK WHILE LEAVING OTHER COMMENTS THAT, MAYBE YOU LIKE OR MAYBE YOU DON'T, YOU KNOW, PULL BACK FOR SOME LEGITIMATE REASON, COULD BE A FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION. ALSO, THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR A MEETING. IN FACT, I DID TALK TO YOU ABOUT THAT SOME SEVERAL MEETINGS AGO. MIGHT BE LAST YEAR WHEN I TALKED ABOUT WHAT IS A --WHEN YOU SHOULD AND SHOULDN'T COMMUNICATE WITH SOMEONE WHO IS ENGAGING IN SOCIAL MEDIA. THERE'S ACTUALLY A GROUND-AT SPECIFIC STATUTE ON THAT. IF MORE THAN WHAT YOU ENGAGE WITH A POST ON SOCIAL MEDIA, THAT COULD BECOME A MEETING UNDER THE BROWN ACT. SO, REALLY, THE IDEA HERE WAS JUST TO HAVE A WAY OF REMINDING COUNCILMEMBERS THAT THESE ARE THE CONSEQUENCES SO THAT YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THAT . THE REALITY IS SOCIAL MEDIA IS PRESENT. I MEAN, EVERYONE IS USING IT. ALL OF YOU --PROBABLY --NOT ONLY IS IT NOW, AS COUNCILMEMBERS, BUT IT WAS SOMETHING YOU ALL USED IN YOUR ELECTIONS COMMUNICATE WITH PERSPECTIVE VOTERS. SO, BY ALL MEANS, IT IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED, SOMETHING THAT IS GOOD, BUT BECAUSE OF THE MODERN ERA, BECAUSE OF THE PERVASIVENESS AND UBIQUITY OF SOCIAL MEDIA, THE IDEA HERE IS JUST TO HAVE THESE REMINDERS, AND THE ONLY WAY I CAN REALLY THINK OF TO CREATE SOMETHING THAT WAS ENFORCEABLE, QUOTE UNQUOTE, WAS TO REQUIRE THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE BE GIVEN TO COUNCILMEMBERS BEFORE EACH TERM. SO, IF ANY OF YOU --BASICALLY --AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT TERM --OR IF A COUNCIL MEMBER IS APPOINTED AFTER A VACANCY, YOU WILL GET A COPY, AND THEN YOU WILL GET A COPY EVERY TERM YOU SERVE, EVEN IF YOU SERVE MULTIPLE TERMS THAT WAS THE IDEA. REALLY, I AM LOOKING FOR DIRECTION. DO YOU WANT THIS TO BE INTRODUCED? DO YOU WANT IT TO BE INTRODUCED UNDER AMENDMENT? DO YOU WANT SOMETHING DIFFERENT? I AM OPEN TO YOUR DIRECTION. >> ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE ONE, ESPECIALLY BASED ON THIS SUPREME COURT CASE. I THINK WHAT MY CONCERN IS IS I DON'T WANT THE CITY PAYING FOR SOMEBODY'S -- I DON'T KNOW --POOR JUDGMENT OR WHATEVER --ON SOCIAL MEDIA. I GUESS, MY ONLY QUESTION IS, HOW IS THE CITY PROTECTED? THIS IS LIKE THEY W

Minutes of the Regular Joint Meeting of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority held April 9, 2024 1) OPENING MATTERS 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority Mayor Anissa Williams called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Vice Mayor Shannon Shaw and Councilmembers Hugh Henderson and Aaron Meadows were in attendance. Councilmember Dr. George Fuller joined via teleconference. Mayor Williams announced that Dr. Fuller was joining from the Hilton Garden Inn Philadelphia Center City Room 973, 1100 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Daniel Adair, Delta Vista Middle School Student) Daniel Adair led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 1.3 Proclamation Recognizing April 7-13, 2024, as National Library Week and Update from Oakley Library Manager Lisa Cano-Loomis Mayor Williams presented the proclamation to Oakley Library Manager Lisa Cano- Loomis. Ms. Cano-Loomis provided a PowerPoint presentation regarding the library including National Library Week, circulation, e-book checkouts, library visits, most popular books in 2023, Rolling Reader, CareersOnline High School, Library Foundation of Contra Costa, Bookmark Art contest winners, STEAMUp Spring Break, Sterling the Bubblesmith, Rockets Away, sensory playtime/neurodiversity, and how a larger library would provide welcoming and safe community space, space for children, space for teens, meeting rooms, study rooms, Friends of the Oakley Library space, and endless possibilities. Councilmember Meadows inquired what is located on the wall in slide 14. Ms. Cano-Loomis mentioned she believes it is the donor wall at the Pleasant Hill Library.

Councilmember Meadows mentioned he pointed out the wall because that is what it will take to have a new Oakley Library. Dr. Fuller thanked her for her presentation and mentioned he looks forward to working with her. He mentioned he likes the diagram of the proposed Library on the City’s webpage; it is something they can begin envisioning. 2) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Williams mentioned there was one online public comment submitted and it will be made part of the meeting record. The comment was submitted by Julie P. She inquired what could be done regarding homeless tents off Laurel and the freeway. Dr. Richard Brophy shared that he has been a resident since 1992, and last month, he provided irrefutable evidence of the unconscionable burden brought on our country by illegal immigration. He mentioned the statistics are not of a political affiliation; they are from the federal government. He also mentioned that illegal aliens are drawn to sanctuary cities, are allowed to place an unconscionable burden on taxpayers, and are committing crimes at a disproportionate percentage related to the population. He mentioned if you turn on the television, you’ll see an attack on a citizen or even a law enforcement officer because they have no regard for our laws, not all of them, but enough of them where we need to be concerned. He mentioned that today, 125,000 illegals were transported to San Diego. He shared that he was once a trustee for a church, and he always inquired how they are going to pay for it, and here they are not; they are going to have to raise taxes in an already highly taxed state. He requested until they can remove, via the ballot box, those who have a cavalier approach to enforcing our laws, we’re basically on our own. He mentioned Oakley is not a sanctuary city and he is requesting the City Council make a public proclamation reaffirming that it is not a sanctuary city and immediately amend the City’s website homepage to show that it is not a sanctuary city; it is a city that obeys the law. He provided data for the Council and the oath of office and asked the Council to review the oath and make a public vote on the issue so they can see who takes the oath seriously. Bud Chaddock mentioned it is now spring and, in the fall, the salmon will spawn again. He shared that by his calculations, he estimates at least 1,000 salmon were poached from the creek this past year, indicating that he is walking the area to see it. He mentioned it is very serious, as there is not going to be a commercial sport season once again, and there are a lot of people affected by it. He thanked Mayor Williams for reaching out to him, looking up data and doing footwork, as it is more serious than people realize and it is allowing extinction to happen, but there have been a few people getting together on it. He mentioned that Dr. Fuller made comments on it earlier and Mayor Williams has done homework on it that justifies doing something more than they are doing; indicating not one citation has been issued. He mentioned since all the beautiful work has been done in the creek to connect with the Delta again to allow for proper spawning again; to let it go for not is not the right direction to go in. He shared that September/October/November will be paramount in patrolling it and fines should be handed out, for possession alone, especially because people are out of work because of it and are losing their businesses and boats from it, people that make good money from it and do it right, in a lawful way.

3) COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Councilmember Meadows asked Mr. Chaddock to follow up with him where Fish & Game is in this matter. Dr. Fuller commented on the public comment submitted reporting the encampment on the Laurel overpass. He shared that he recently asked City Manager Joshua McMurray about it, and Mr. McMurray reminded him it is the City of Antioch’s area and their responsibility. He shared that he is presenting at the AERA (American Education Research Association) conference, and the City of Pittsburgh has a reputation as the most accessible city for disabled persons with the City of Philadelphia right behind them. He mentioned in being a disabled person, they are very welcoming and accessible. Mayor Williams commented that recently Governor Newsom reported on the record level snowpack; however, that water is still a huge issue for California. She mentioned he has released many articles on the topic and has indicated in them that he vows to bring back the Delta Conveyance Project in his Water Plan. 4) CONSENT CALENDAR 4.1 Approve Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Oakley City Council held February 24, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Mayor Williams mentioned that staff has requested to pull item 4.4. She inquired if there is a date certain to which it is being continued. City Attorney Derek Cole mentioned they hope to bring it back at the next meeting. Item 4.1 was pulled by Vice Mayor Shaw. Item 4.2 was pulled by Dr. Fuller. Item 4.6 was pulled by Mayor Williams. It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. The City Clerk conducted a roll call vote. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) Item 4.1 Vice Mayor Shaw commented that she reviewed the proposed changes and went back to watch the video where some of the changes were suggested, and she is noticing that some of the proposed changes are beyond what was said at the last meeting. She mentioned that she has no problem changing the spelling of David Wall's last name to Wahl. She added that she believes the minutes were as detailed as they could have been and one of the comments made during the last meeting was, “I meant to say”, which she believes is a slippery slope to do down because they all get up there and say things, and what they meant to say maybe didn’t come out that way, and if they keep going back to what was meant to be said or what they were referencing, it is a problem

for her, and they talked about changing minutes before, and she is not supporting any other changes. Mayor Williams inquired if they could move this item to keep the original minutes without other changes except for the correct spelling of David Wahl’s last name. Ms. Vreonis responded that she believes the Council could do that, rejecting all other changes other than David Wahl. Dr. Fuller asked for it to be explained. City Attorney Derek Cole mentioned their options would be if it is the pleasure of the Council to approve the minutes with the amendments shown in red, the motion would be to move the minutes as amended; if it is the Council’s pleasure to approve the minutes as previously presented at the last meeting, the motion would be to approve the minutes without the changes shown in red; a third option is if there is a change the Council accepts, which is the gentleman’s name, the Council can make a motion to approve the minutes as originally drafted without the changes, except for the gentleman’s name. Dr. Fuller commented that he believes the minutes should be detailed and correct. He shared that that he was asked to put his words in writing which he did, and no one asked for word for word verbatim. He mentioned it is a good summary and is accurate; to not include it would be a disservice to the community; they rely on the minutes; and when they need corrections, they need to be corrected. He mentioned he has seen it go on for 2-3 meetings now and he has seen where it has been said that he didn’t do it right so we won’t vote on it now and we won’t go back and change the minutes because whatever they say the first time is good enough and he would oppose any of that. Dr. Fuller moved to approve the minutes as amended. The motion died for lack of second. It was moved by Vice Mayor Shaw and seconded by Mayor Williams to approve the original minutes except for amending David Wall to reflect David Wahl. The City Clerk conducted a roll call vote. The item was approved. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller (with the caveat that the proposed amendments be attached to these minutes). (4-1) Item 4.2 Dr. Fuller mentioned that the “Randall-Bold Water Treatment Plant” should replace “Ironhouse Sanitary District” on page 3 of the minutes where he provided Councilmember comments. He moved to approve the item with this amendment.

Councilmember Meadows commented that the Council had a joint meeting with Ironhouse Sanitary District and Diablo Water District at Big Break Regional Park. He mentioned Randall-Bold is the water treatment plant off Neroly. Mayor Williams mentioned she believes Randall-Bold was brought up during Council reports as part of what happened at the Diablo Water District meeting, but she does not see it here. Dr. Fuller’s motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to approve the minute as presented. The City Clerk conducted a roll call vote. AYES: Henderson, Meadows, Shaw, Williams. NOES: Fuller. The item was approved. (4-1) Item 4.6 Mayor Williams mentioned she pulled the item so the public can hear all the projects and the report in case they are not able to look through the agenda packet. She asked if staff could provide an overview of all the great work happening and that still to come. Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani provided highlights of his report, including feature projects at East Cypress Road and Laurel Road. He mentioned he will have a report on Laurel Road later on the agenda. He mentioned that construction for the East Cypress Road project will occur in the next 2-3 years from Knightsen Avenue in an eastward direction to Bethel Island Road and will include 4 lanes, a median, sidewalks, curb, gutter, underground drainage systems, and traffic signals. He mentioned parts of it have already been designed, awarded, contracted and other parts are under design. He mentioned the other important project is Laurel Road near the O’Hara Avenue intersection. He explained they have been working for several years to obtain the right-of-way and it is now under design. He mentioned it involves moving big WAPA utility poles which WAPA will be relocating over the next 2-3 months, and he will present a contract for construction in July which he hopes, if approved, they may begin construction in August. He explained that the construction will complete the road from O’Hara Avenue to Cloverbrook Avenue and also O’Hara Avenue from Laurel Road south to the end of the Del Barba vineyard. He added that the benefit and timing of the project is important as the Safeway shopping center project and this project will complement each other. He mentioned the Safeway project will start its offsite work by August/September so by end of summer next year, the offsite work on Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue will include a traffic signal and there will be major improvement. He mentioned just as important as these projects, it is also important for the City to replace and repair damaged concrete and the City offers a cost-share program to share the cost with property owners. He mentioned that project is under construction now and staff will bring an acceptance report to the Council in May. He mentioned other small projects that are just as important such as the traffic calming project, continuing traffic signal modernization, and an award for the Enrico Cinquini Park. It was moved by Mayor Williams and seconded by Vice Mayor Shaw to accept the report. The City Clerk conducted a roll call vote. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0)

4.2 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held March 26, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) 4.3 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 4.4 Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Grant Deed Conveying to the City of Oakley Certain Real Property Interests (portions of APN 034-090-022, located at Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue) (Derek Cole, City Attorney) 4.5 Adopt a Resolution Accepting as complete the work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number 249-Recreation Center Emergency Generator Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 4.6 Accept the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Third Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 4.7 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Francisco & Associates, Inc. for preparation of professional special Police Tax Services (P6), Community Facility District (CFD), Lighting and Landscape Assessment District (LLAD), and Common Area Maintenance (CAM) for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 4.8 Adopt a Resolution Approving a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Final Map for Machado Property Subdivision 9615 located at the southwest corner of East Cypress Road and Machado Lane (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 4.9 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to K&K JL Services, Inc. for the construction of the Public Works Operations Building Remodeling Project, Capital Improvement Project Number 303 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) 4.10 Adopt a Resolution Appointing a Representative to the Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging for a Two-Year Term (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) 5) PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Williams announced there are no public hearing items. 6) REGULAR CALENDAR 6.1 Approve a Letter of Support for Senate Bill 1034 (SB 1034) regarding a California Public Record Act response extension during a declared State of Emergency (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk)

City Clerk Libby Vreonis presented the staff report. There were no public comments. Dr. Fuller requested the letter be amended to include that the state incur the cost of the City Clerk’s Office to retrieve records in response to Public Records Act requests as it is a state mandated program for the Clerk to retrieve records at the local level. He motioned to approve the letter with this amendment. The motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Vice Mayor Shaw and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to approve the letter of support as presented. The City Clerk conducted a roll call vote. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 6.2 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Design and Construction Agreement with Contra Costa Water District for the Canal Undergrounding Project Segment 5A on East Cypress Road at Jersey Island Road associated with Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 310 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Public Works Director/City Engineer Kevin Rohani presented the staff report. Mayor Williams inquired if road completion would be able to happen without undergrounding of the canal. Mr. Rohani mentioned that it can, but not really because the canal still needs to be addressed. He explained that this is the only section not undergrounded at the Cypress overcrossing; pipes are undergrounded north and south and now they have to close the gap, install pipes, and put the roadway on top. There were no public comments. It was moved by Councilmember Meadows and seconded by Councilmember Henderson to approve the item. The City Clerk conducted a roll call vote. Motion was unanimous and so ordered. (5-0) 7) REPORTS 7.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager City Manager Joshua McMurray announced that Art in the Park will be held Saturday, 10am-1:00 pm, and if it rains, the Recreation Division has an alternative. He also announced that on May 4, the City will host the City’s 25th Anniversary Party at Civic Center Plaza, 4:00pm-10:00pm. He reported that the second Library Stakeholders’ meeting was held last week, and progress is being made. He mentioned the City’s website homepage has been updated to include information regarding the envisioned library with a link to the Friends of Oakley Library website that has information regarding the project, and the Friends have kickstarted their fundraising effort.

(b) Business License Update Mr. McMurray mentioned the business license report for March was included with the agenda packet. 7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency Councilmember Meadows reported he attended the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Planning Committee meeting last Thursday where the WETA (Water Emergency Transportation Authority) Ferry Service was discussed, including 4 proposed locations, two in Hercules and two in Pittsburg/Antioch, but not all four will go. Vice Mayor Shaw reported she attended the Tri-Delta Transit meeting, the Library sub- committee meeting, and the ribbon cutting at Willy’s Bagels last Friday. Councilmember Henderson reported he attended the Ironhouse Sanitary District meeting on April 2 and they are working on public education which we will see more of in the community. He also reported he attended the Contra Costa County Needs for Affordable Housing and Homelessness consortium held in Brentwood on April 4, the ribbon cutting for Willy’s Bagels on April 5 and it is exciting to have that new business in town, and Friday Night Bites where the weather was a little cold. Dr. Fuller reported ABAG/BAHFA/others are in full force to get the $20 billion regional affordable housing bond issue on the November ballot and the next report will be August 2 nd. He mentioned he will have more on this when he returns. He also mentioned one of the most disturbing aspects is that they seem to have a bouncing ball; they don’t have a set $10 billion or $20 billion but are going forth with a regional approach which for 9 counties, will impact residents’ property tax. He also reported that AB 1657 (Wicks) is going along fine, and she is taking the lead for democrats with affordable housing, and she is now toying with more measures to come which is a little frightening because Mayor Arreguin from Berkeley who is endorsed by The Chronicle and East Bay Times will join on the other side of the State Senate floor. He mentioned he will provide more details at the next meeting. Mayor Williams reported she attended the Tri-Delta Transit meeting where SB 1031 (Weiner/Wahab) was discussed and could appear in 2026. She mentioned it is being driven by MTC to regionalize transportation but for those familiar with Tri-Delta Transit, it started because centralized transportation didn’t meet needs in our area. She shared that MTC is analyzing different things; it could choose to do a sales tax, a road toll, or other means to raise funds, including bond measures. She explained that the bill would give MTC control over state funds that could be allocated toward the urban core, even if a bond measure were not approved by voters. She mentioned Tri-Delta and others are opposing it because it takes control away from the voters where the money is going to be spent. She shared that two Tri-Delta Transit drivers were awarded for safe driving

involving accidents or near accidents. She reported that she also attended the Library Stakeholders’ meeting and Mayors Conference. She mentioned that at the Mayors Conference, a presentation was provided regarding stormwater funding options and there is a Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit which is issued every 5 years, it becomes more costly and stringent each time it is issued, and every city in Contra Costa County is a co-permittee except for Richmond and Brentwood. She explained that when the permit was first issued it had 10 provisions and there are now 21 provisions. She mentioned that the speakers discussed impacts to municipalities of the new provisions, one being unsheltered homeless populations and that municipalities are required to provide a map where those populations are located and create plans for stormwater runoff. She explained that becomes complicated when they have shared jurisdiction with CalTrans, Diablo Water District, etc. She mentioned starting in July, cities will need to document implementation costs and there is a $45 million deficit from these unfunded mandates, so cities and counties need a way to fund it and are reviewing funding options, the deficit can only be expected to increase, and they can potentially be exposed to third party lawsuits due to non-compliance. She shared that CalTrans was issued a cease-and-desist order by the Water Board because of trash on the roadways that causes stormwater issues. She also reported she was appointed to the Delta Protection Commission. She mentioned they offered an endorsement to continue the Library Commission which she moved, and it passed unanimously. She mentioned they also heard about CCTA (Contra Costa Transportation Authority) for receiving a Legacy Award for innovation, She mentioned that on Earth Day there will be a vegetation management event at Big Break 10am-12pm. She mentioned that they also received a report on ABAG and April 18 is the next big vote for BAHFA. (b) Requests for Future Agendas Dr. Fuller requested staff draft a letter to the Department of Fish & Wildlife to provide notice of salmon poaching in our area. He mentioned it is his understanding that the Contra Costa County Sheriff has jurisdiction over the rivers as well as the U.S. Coast Guard and requested the letter also be sent to them. Mayor Williams inquired if that would need to be a work session or if it is possible to draft the letter and bring it back. City Manager Joshua McMurray mentioned staff has enough information to propose a draft letter and ask for it to be approved or modified and sent. Dr. Fuller agreed and inquired if staff could research the San Joaquin/Sacramento Rivers and adjoining waterways to see if they can address all three agencies he mentioned. Mr. McMurray confirmed staff can do that. Mayor Williams supported it. Councilmember Henderson suggested East Bay Regional Parks District also be included because he believes it has jurisdiction over the pathway. Dr. Fuller agreed with that.

Dr. Fuller also requested a draft letter to the state legislature to revoke or rescind Proposition 47 to address when someone steals something, they get time in County jail, but County jails don’t have enough space and do not get reimbursed from the state so really no time is being served for things such as retail theft, burglary, etc. He mentioned he would like to see it revoked or replaced to provide accountability and some form of mechanism for viable justice. Mayor Williams commented that there are 247 bills related to amending, changing, or gutting Proposition 47 and Vice Mayor Shaw has sat on the policy committees. Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned that there are a lot of legislators not looking to repeal Proposition 47 but are open to amending it and she is fine with starting a draft letter on the City’s position. City Manager Joshua McMurray requested clarification whether the letter would be specific to Proposition 47 and Vice Mayor Shaw confirmed it would be. 8) WORK SESSIONS 8.1 Report to the City Council Regarding Implementation of a Social Media Policy for Members of the City Council (Derek Cole, City Attorney) City Attorney Derek Cole presented the staff report. Mayor Williams commented that she doesn’t want the City paying for someone’s poor judgment on social media, and with the Supreme Court case, it looks like they went after the individual, but she would like to know if it would be on a case-by-case basis and if the City could be held responsible for someone making comments ahead of time that would prejudice a quasi-judicial decision. Mr. Cole explained that a person can sue a City or an individual and there are two types, equitable relief which is a judgment by the court that says do or don’t do something, and the other is damages. He explained that if a Councilmember said something truly defamatory and if the City is sued, the immunities are so broad that a defamatory, malicious statement would likely be immunized. He further explained that if someone is communicating in a way that is defamatory by law and someone tried to say it was an official act of the City, the City would have broad immunities under California state law so as a practical matter, it may be virtually impossible to hold the City responsible, but that doesn’t mean lawsuits can’t be filed. He mentioned that the hope here is that these reminders will tell Councilmembers now and into the future, be careful with what they say. Mayor Williams commented that she didn’t ask him to poll neighboring cities, but she doesn’t think it is unusual to have a social media policy. Mr. Cole explained the difference here is that he is attempting to address Councilmember’s communications on their private media that they own and only they can access, but on which they talk about things they do for the City which the City has no control over. He further explained that the official social media for the City is under

the direction of the city manager and staff delegated to post on social media and they administer that policy. He added that what the Councilmembers do on their own social media accounts is unofficial; what the City does is official. Councilmember Meadows mentioned he was going to ask the same thing as he wants to make sure the Council does not have any liability. He commented that he understands why the policy was requested but also believes in the First Amendment. He explained that they’re accountable for what they say, some people will like or not like comments they make, and comments they make on social media or verbally reflect on themselves, the City as a whole, and reflects on staff. He mentioned they should be aware of what they are saying when they are doing it, but they have the right to do it. He added that he doesn’t have to like other Councilmembers’ comments but they have right to make them and it is a reflection on them. Councilmember Henderson commented that when he brought the item forward, he was looking for and hoping to see guidelines for what the Brown Act says they can do or can’t do, i.e., “liking” a comment, providing a thumbs up, or disagree with them on a comment, or if they decide to make a separate post on the same topic, is it is now serial meeting. He mentioned having guidelines for the current and future Council will be helpful for both the Council and public to understand what they can and can’t do, and that was his reason for wanting to see this policy come forward. Dr. Fuller mentioned it is his understanding with the Lindke v. Freed decision that Councilmembers have not forfeited their First Amendment right; they can talk, but if the Council, as official government action, has voted on a certain item together to censure or squash any comment of a particular Councilmember, that Councilmember can now sue the City for a violation of Lindke v. Freed and other compensation for a violation of First Amendment rights, the City would be liable from the individual, and the Councilmember could file suit in federal or state court. Mr. Cole mentioned that is incorrect. He explained that Lindke only dealt with the issue of whether a particular elected official’s actions on social media were state action and First Amendment protections would kick in (if something is not state action, the First Amendment does not reach that conduct). He clarified that the court was addressing if communications and actions on social media were actions of the government, and the issue of damages was not there. He mentioned he provided a summary on censures some meetings ago and the court there ruled that the censure does not violate the First Amendment rights of the censured party, generally, unless there is some type of punitive measure attached to it. He mentioned he cannot see any basis for damages against the City from one Councilmember censuring another Councilmember because that is essentially the nature of politics, but that is not the question presented tonight; the question presented tonight is if the Council wants to go forward with this policy or do something else. He mentioned he realizes it doesn’t have a lot of teeth, but damages and other things are not what is addressed in this policy. Dr. Fuller agreed with Councilmember Meadows in that comments are reflective of that Councilmember, and he agrees they are public comments. He mentioned that he is not averse to having his comments public and he makes them public; there is no reason to hide them if he is putting them out and it is a reflection on him or a reflection on another person that goes through. He expressed concern that they keep saying they have to

protect City staff and optics. He mentioned he was once injured by the former City Manager because he was not giving good optics and the City realized that and didn’t like it and rightly so. He mentioned the Council does not cover City staff; the Council supervises staff and commends them when they are doing well and if there are boo- boos they stand up to say there are boo-boos, so people now, in his estimation, have much more confidence in City Hall and City Council, and they understand nothing will be held in secret or thrown on three days before it comes up. He mentioned he believes that is the best route to go. He shared that Lindke v. Freed is a big case that has made national news, the policy is good as it is operating in the spirit of the law, and he agrees with the resolution as presented. Vice Mayor Shaw commented that she does not see this infringing on personal First Amendment rights and likes that. She also commented that this will be good for new Councilmembers coming on as there may be things that they don’t think of, i.e., blocking somebody on social media could potentially be problem or serial meeting comments regarding the Brown Act. She mentioned it is a good idea to get it when you come in but also as a reminder because you get complacent and can forget in going about day-to- day things. She mentioned that she thinks they are all free to say what they want on social media, but they do work together so maybe they shouldn’t like or dislike something someone posts. She commented that she does not mind the way this was written; it was well thought out and while they can’t have something with teeth in it, if something happens, they have a reminder of this policy. Dr. Fuller mentioned it is important for the public to realize that a Councilmember is not quoting for the City, and that is why he tries to use words such as “my perspective”, “my opinion”, and “what I observed”, so he is not saying it is official. Mr. Cole mentioned they don’t have to take a vote and inquired if the Council wants him to bring it back to formally introduce it. Mayor Williams mentioned she is for it; it provides clarity and as Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned, they get complacent, so it is a good reminder. She inquired if things change and they modernize the Brown Act if it would trigger an update which Mr. Cole confirmed it would. She inquired if there is consensus for Mr. Cole to bring it back to formally introduce it. Councilmember Henderson and Dr. Fuller confirmed they are fine with it. Mr. Cole confirmed he will bring back the item to formally introduce it. 9) CLOSED SESSION 9.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) County of Contra Costa et al. (and City of Oakley) v. Monsanto Company et al., Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. C22-02818 Schaefers v. BNSF Railway Company et. al. (and City of Oakley), Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case Nos. C22-01552 and C22-01555

McCalister v. Moeckel at al. (and City of Oakley), Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. C23-00834 City of Oakley v. Scelsi, Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. MSN16-1620 City of Oakley v. Rodriguez, Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. N23-1091 Mayor Williams announced the closed session items. She announced after closed session, the meeting will adjourn, and the next regular meeting will be held Tuesday, April 23, 2024, at 6:30pm in the Oakley City Council Chambers, and the community is invited to attend. 10) ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Libby Vreonis City Clerk

Showing the first 24,000 of 294,472 characters. The full document is at the source.

AGENDA REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/OAKLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Tuesday, April 09, 2024 6:30 PM Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California 94561. NOTE: Councilmember Fuller will join via teleconference. His location is the Hilton Garden Inn Philadelphia Center City Room 973, 1100 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065. MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley will create a resilient future that fosters and attracts a vibrant and evolving community that welcomes and values all people. VISION STATEMENT: The City of Oakley celebrates our unique Delta lifestyle and small-town feel where we Live in a safe, dynamic community, Work together to build the future, and Play in our own backyard. Agendas are posted in Oakley at Oakley City Hall-3231 Main Street, outside the gym at Delta Vista Middle School-4901 Frank Hengel Way and outside the Library at Freedom High School-1050 Neroly Road. Agendas are also posted on the City’s Internet Website www.ci.oakley.ca.us. A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item is available for public review prior to an Oakley City Council and/or City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority meeting at Oakley City Hall, 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Oakley City Council, Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency or Oakley Public Financing Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection, during regular business hours, at the front counter in the Main Lobby of the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561. Agendas may be picked up at the Oakley City Hall located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 for no charge. To request information regarding placement on the City’s agenda e-mail distribution list, please contact us at (925) 625-7000. 1

The City of Oakley provides social media options to stay connected to City Hall through Facebook, Twitter, Next Door and Instagram. Other opportunities to connect with City Hall include Engage In Oakley, Oakley OnDemand on the City's website, and by emailing info@ci.oakley.ca.us. If you have a physically challenging condition and require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk’s office at (925) 625-7000. Please keep cell phones/electronic devices turned off during the meeting. Please be advised that City Council meetings are video recorded and attendees may appear on video. Information Regarding Public Comment Members of the public may address the Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. In compliance with State law, the council may not take actionor have discussion on any item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. Public comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard under the Public Comments section of the agenda. Public comments on items listed on the agenda will be heard as the Mayor calls the items. In compliance with State law, the Council may not take action on an item that is not specifically listed on the agenda. If you would like to speak on any agenda item, please fill out a public speaker card available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk seated in the Council Chamber prior to the agenda item being called. The Mayor will call you by name to the podium to hear your comment. PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. Online public comments are accepted until 5 p.m. the day of the meeting and can be submitted at https://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/online-public-comment-card/. 1.OPENING MATTERS Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call of the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag (Daniel Adair, Delta Vista Middle School Student) 1.3 Proclamation Recognizing April 7-13, 2024, as National Library Week and Update from Oakley Library Manager Lisa Cano-Loomis Proclamation 2.PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, the public is permitted to address the Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority on non-agendized items. 2

3.COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 4.CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the Oakley City Council/ Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency/Oakley Public Financing Authority who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor remove the item. The public may request to remove an item(s) to provide input by completing a public speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk prior to the item(s) being called by the Mayor. 4.1 Approve Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Oakley City Council held February 24, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Minutes 02-24-24 with suggested revisions 4.2 Approve Minutes from the Regular Joint City Council/City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency and Special Public Financing Authority Meeting held March 26, 2024 (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Minutes 03-26-24 4.3 Accept Report Out of Closed Session Memo (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Memo 4.4 Adopt a Resolution Accepting a Grant Deed Conveying to the City of Oakley Certain Real Property Interests (portions of APN 034-090-022, located at Laurel Road and O’Hara Avenue) (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Staff Report 1. Proposed Resolution Accepting Real Property 4.5 Adopt a Resolution Accepting as complete the work associated with Capital Improvement Project Number 249 – Recreation Center Emergency Generator Project (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Notice of Completion 4.6 Accept the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023/24 Third Quarter Report on the Capital Improvement Program (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 3

4.7 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Francisco & Associates, Inc. for preparation of professional special Police Tax Services (P6), Community Facility District (CFD), Lighting and Landscape Assessment District (LLAD), and Common Area Maintenance (CAM) for FY 2024/25 and FY 2025/26 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Proposal 4.8 Adopt a Resolution Approving a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Final Map for Machado Property Subdivision 9615 located at the southwest corner of East Cypress Road and Machado Lane (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Vicinity Map 2. Resolution Approving the Final Map 3. Resolution Approving the Subdivision Improvement Agreement 4. Subdivision Improvement Agreement w/ Exhibits A-E 5. Reduction of Subdivision 9615 Machado Property Final Map 4.9 Adopt a Resolution Awarding a Construction Contract to K&K JL Services, Inc. for the construction of the Public Works Operations Building Remodeling Project, Capital Improvement Project Number 303 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Bid Summary 4.10 Adopt a Resolution Appointing a Representative to the Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging for a Two-Year Term (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Staff Report 1. Application and Resume 2. Proposed Resolution 5.PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.REGULAR CALENDAR 6.1 Approve a Letter of Support for Senate Bill 1034 (SB 1034) regarding a California Public Record Act response extension during a declared State of 4

Emergency (Libby Vreonis, City Clerk) Staff Report 1. Proposed Letter of Support 6.2 Adopt a Resolution Approving the Design and Construction Agreement with Contra Costa Water District for the Canal Undergrounding Project Segment 5A on East Cypress Road at Jersey Island Road associated with Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Number 310 (Kevin Rohani, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer) Staff Report 1. Resolution 2. Project Vicinity Map 3. Contra Costa Canal Replacement Project Exhibit 4. Agreement 7.REPORTS 7.1 CITY MANAGER (a) City Manager (b) Business License Update (b) March 2024 New Business Licenses 7.2 OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL/OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (a) Reports from Council Liaisons to Regional Committees, Commissions and Boards AND Oakley City Council/Oakley City Council Acting as the Successor Agency to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency (b) Requests for Future Agendas 8.WORK SESSIONS 8.1 Report to the City Council Regarding Implementation of a Social Media Policy for Members of the City Council (Derek Cole, City Attorney) Staff Report 1. Draft Ordinance Enacting Social Media Policy 2. Copy of United States Supreme Court Decision, Lindke v. Freed 9.CLOSED SESSION 5

9.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) County of Contra Costa et al. (and City of Oakley) v. Monsanto Company et al., Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. C22-02818 Schaefers v. BNSF Railway Company et. al. (and City of Oakley), Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case Nos. C22-01552 and C22-01555 McCalister v. Moeckel at al. (and City of Oakley), Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. C23-00834 City of Oakley v. Scelsi, Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. MSN16-1620 City of Oakley v. Rodriguez, Contra Costa Sup. Ct. Case No. N23-1091 10.ADJOURN 6

PROCLAMATION National Library Week April 7-13, 2024 WHEREAS, libraries offer the opportunity for everyone to connect with others, learn new skills, and pursue their passions, no matter where they are on life’s journey; and WHEREAS, libraries serve as trusted institutions, striving to ensure equitable access to information and services for all members of the community; and WHEREAS, libraries are accessible and inclusive places that promote a sense of local connection and shared community goals; and WHEREAS, libraries play a pivotal role in economic development by providing resources and support for job seekers, entrepreneurs, and small businesses, thus contributing to local prosperity and growth; and WHEREAS, libraries are an essential public good and fundamental in democratic societies, working to protect the right to education and literacy, and promote the free exchange of information and ideas; and WHEREAS, library workers are joining library supporters and advocates across the nation to celebrate National Library Week. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Anissa Williams, Mayor of the City of Oakley along with the members of the Oakley City Council, hereby proclaim, National Library Week, April 7-13, 2024. During this week, all residents are encouraged to visit their library and celebrate adventures and opportunities they unlock for us every day. April 9, 2024 ____________________ Anissa Williams, Mayor 7

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE OAKLEY CITY COUNCIL HELD FEBRUARY 24, 2024 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Mayor Anissa Williams called the meeting to order at 9:01am in the Oakley City Council Chambers located at 3231 Main Street, Oakley, California. Vice Mayor Shannon Shaw and Councilmembers Hugh Henderson, Dr. George Fuller, and Aaron Meadows were also present. 2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Councilmember Henderson led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 3. Public Comments No public comments were submitted. 4. Work Session 4.1 Governance Workshop Melissa Kuehne, ILG Senior Program Manager and Jennifer King, Consultant, introduced themselves and began their PowerPoint presentation. Ms. Kuehne provided an overview of the agenda and discussed objectives (leadership and governance refresher, review governance tools and gain additional insights about Council colleagues). The City Council and leadership team introduced themselves. Ms. Kuehne shared information about ILG and discussed leadership and governance (trust, accountability, responsiveness, and transparency). City Manager Joshua McMurray stated for the record that the City was subject to a ransomware attack Thursday and currently has no internet or phone capability so this meeting will not be livestreamed or recorded. He shared critical points including having good governance, being good stewards of resources, holding the highest ethical standards in decision making, being professional, and maintaining good morale. Ms. Kuehne asked Councilmembers to share what inspired them to run for City Council. 8

Dr. Fuller shared that he had differences in how the city was being governed and being managed by the former City Manager and the community did not feel it was getting the information it needed. He mentioned the then Council was doing things with 3 days’ notice without public input then saying they had to do it and it was obvious developers were running the city. He shared that he wanted the public to participate, was glad the city went to districts, and when the City Manager left and there were three new members on the dais in 2020, and then two new members in 2022, he was happy to see something new and dynamic. Councilmember Meadows shared that in the 1990s, he sat on the Oakley Municipal Advisory Council until it became a city, and his father was involved in local politics in the 1970s so he has been living it. He shared they have a family in business in Oakley which he has continued, and he looks at it as his city. He mentioned that he had some issues with the former City Manager but that did not influence his decision to run; it was good timing in his life to run for Council with his kids now being older. Mayor Williams shared that during COVID, her job was furloughed, and she saw many people struggling during that time, so she started a Facebook group to connect people to resources, first doing things for first responders, then providing assistance to restaurants, and the group is now around 15,000 people today. She explained she wanted to do it on a larger scale to help others and take leadership in a positive direction. She mentioned in 3.5 years, she has a long list of things she has done to make the community better and make a difference in lives. Vice Mayor Shaw shared that she works in Pittsburg and lives here where she joined a service club of which many elected were part of and they were normal, and with her family growing up, she began attended meetings, had an interest in the Planning Commission, then the City went to districts, so she started as a Planning Commissioner and then ran for and was elected to Council. Councilmember Henderson shared that he has 37 years in public safety with police and fire, he watched the City incorporate, and there are projects the City is still trying to make happen that he is now part of. Ms. King reviewed takeaways from the assessment interviews they conducted, including excellence in government, Council roles, successes, challenges, what is working well and where there is room for improvement. The Council had an opportunity to share their initial reactions to the feedback. 9

Dr. Fuller suggested they include fire department consolidation, an accomplishment for safety, along with E. Cypress Road. He shared that the hostility on the dais is untenable; Mayor Williams is flopping on the dais and talking to others while his daughter was dying of pancreatic cancer. in a manner that Dr. Fuller named “the Anissa flop,” and council members Shaw, Meadows and Williams sharing private conversations while council member Fuller was speaking. This occurred during the year that council member Fuller’s daughter was dying from Pancreatic Cancer. Council Member Fuller informed the persons in the meeting that his daughter had died May 23 2023, four days after he received his Doctorate in Special Education. He explained he had not informed anyone in City Hall, including the council, of the death except for the City Manager McMurray. Council Member Fuller stated he did not tell his colleagues of the cancer or death because he had learned from the death of his son his colleagues were “not type of people” to share such personal information. He mentioned there is ongoing group think, like with the Rotary, and he is moving forward but it is very uncomfortable. He mentioned they need to address group think, proper decorum, and social media to inform the community. He added that when they talk about policy, they should think about if they are being oppressive, privileged, controlling, or if they are facilitating knowledge for the community. Ms. King mentioned they can have a group discussion and may have differences in opinion and often the best decisions come from talking those through; it is not group think, just decision making. Mayor Williams commented that it is public and what everyone is thinking, and they’ve talked about a social media policy; she is huge proponent of social media but they need respect and decorum. She mentioned that she and Councilmember Meadows are diametrically opposed on matters, but they do not levy personal attacks. She mentioned there should be substantiation, correct wrong information, require factual basis on social media posts, and maintain a level of professionalism with that information. Ms. King mentioned they won’t develop a social media policy today, but it is helpful to have certainty. Councilmember Meadows agreed with Mayor Wiliams in that they have differences in thought but respect each other. He mentioned Dr. Fuller is constantly attacking them for being on Rotary and wants to attack them all the time on social media, and that is the problem. Ms. King mentioned that they all have a desire to work together for the greater good of the City; despite how uncomfortable it can be, the successes are significant. 10

Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned there has been a lot of conversation about social media which should be used to inform, but when it is used it to attack, there is already mistrust in politics throughout the country, it doesn’t highlight the good things the City is doing; it looks like a clown show if they are all putting out their own things. She mentioned they need to explore how they use that platform to get information to the community, rather than as a platform to attack others and make negative comments. She mentioned that she has been on social media weekly and daily for a while this month, and she uses her time at the dais to defend herself when she should be giving attention to business. She added that they are not trying to silence anyone; everything they do gets spun and crazy accusations are made. She mentioned she would like to air things out today, get things off her chest, squash it, and move forward at Tuesday’s meeting. Ms. King mentioned that they can use space to do that. She addressed use of social media for personal attacks and that they never should use it to attack one another. She mentioned the social media policy would not be addressed tonight and it sounds like a Councilmember is characterizing an act of another. Dr. Fuller mentioned he posted an email he received about a the philandering City Manager and was contacted by David Wall with Wahl of Rotary who told Mr. Fuller was a piece of “feces” (using the shit word) several times. Mr. Wahl continued calling him (then Mr. Fuller) who called him scum and unfit to be a Rotarian. He mentioned Mr. Wahl demanded Council Member Fuller resign from the Rotary Club of Oakley. Council Member Fuller refused to do so. Mr. Fuller subsequently was contacted my Vera Martinez, then the President of the Rotary Club of Oakley. She said the Club board asked Mr. Fuller to withdraw the post. Mr. Fuller refused. Ms. Martinez sent him a registered letter stating the board voted to remove Mr. Fuller from the Rotary Club of Oakley for unbecoming conduct of a Rotarian. In other words, the Rotary kicked him out. He mentioned he is told time and time again that Rotary is great but not even his time in Vietnam, working in Police, or as a special education teacher, was he ever called scum. He mentioned that they kicked him out of Rotary, and it was a major issue. Councilmember Henderson shared that he requested this workshop and appreciates everyone putting time in to try and work with one another. He mentioned social media posts affects the Council with the Brown Act and how they look in the community. Ms. Kuehne mentioned there has been focus on social media and the Brown Act, there are new laws and a lot of clarification needed; it has been captured and is on the staff’s list of things to address. 11

Mr. McMurray commented that he has the future agenda items request from the Council for this, and staff is formulating something to bring to the Council in the near future. Ms. King mentioned that the takeaways are generally positive, they are moving in the right direction, the things they have accomplished are great, and they are working on a process here which is achievable. Ms. Kuehne reviewed the foundations for high-performing councils. Mayor Williams mentioned the Council is not agreeing on everything to serve constituents to ensure their voices are heard, civil disagreement is a high performing act, they are a young performing city and there were decisions made by former Council that they don’t all agree with, but she believes they are forward thinking as possible. She mentioned reading agenda packets, coming prepared, having an open mind about all issues, and the ability to pivot is important. Ms. King mentioned that through disagreeing agreeably, they are able to have conversations and are keeping an eye out for the future and community. Vice Mayor Shaw mentioned decisions were made before her time, but she supports them even though not hers, and she respects a vote when made by a majority. She mentioned McDonald’s and Quick Quack were huge issues and she and Mayor Williams were on opposite sides of the vote. She shared that Mayor Williams received a complaint about her (Vice Mayor Shaw) vote and Mayor Williams defended her (Vice Mayor Shaw) vote even though it was opposite of hers (Mayor Williams); she can be on the losing end of a vote but can still be respectful, such as with the train platform and champion things that the City is doing. Councilmember Henderson agreed with both. He mentioned when they do their homework, they should connect with staff so staff can get back to the Council with clarification; it is valuing staff time to make an efficient meeting. Councilmember Meadows everything mentioned he is good with what has been said and it is what he would have said. Dr. Fuller mentioned the Council needs to be informed, they need to understand constituents in their area, have a connection with the community, reflect values, and say what they stand for and let people make decisions, If a Councilmember says what they stand for, who they support, and bring it to the dais, each member on dais should not be judgmental. He mentioned if they don’t understand their constituents and attack others because someone is not in the 12

right club or area, it is not right; they all have a right to speak without saying someone is too old or doesn’t get it. He mentioned they should have communication with staff, disc

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
BudgetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Apr 9, 2024 - 06:27 PM — Minutes
  • Apr 9, 2024 - 06:27 PM

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: 910f3bd96d15afdc3400c76f156227e4. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record