POLISCOPE

The public record

ORANGE (ORANGE COUNTY)Decisions publishedPartial coverage

Design Review Committee

Wednesday, October 2, 2024 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

The City of Orange Design Review Committee met on October 2, 2024, to approve routine administrative items and a new wireless facility project. The committee approved the installation of a new AT&T wireless colocation facility on the roof of the Elks Lodge after discussing electromagnetic emissions.

Why it matters

The committee's approval of Design Review No. 5152-24 allows AT&T to install a new wireless facility at 211 E. Chapman Avenue, which impacts local telecommunications infrastructure.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record - an action agenda or minutes - is published for this meeting.

Record text

No recording or transcript is held for this meeting.

City of Orange Design Review Committee October 02, 2024 MINUTES - FINAL The Design Review Committee of the City of Orange, California convened on October 2, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. in a Regular Meeting in the Council Chamber, 300 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange, California. 1. OPENING/CALL TO ORDER Chair Skorpanich called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 1.1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Committee Member Lopez led the flag salute. 1.2 ROLL CALL Present: Grosse, Ledesma, Lopez, and Skorpanich Absent: Farfan, and McDermott 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the Design Review Committee and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of said items unless members of the Design Review Committee, staff or the public request specific items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 3.1. Approval of minutes of the City of Orange Design Review Committee Regular Meeting held on September 18, 2024. ACTION: Approved minutes as presented. 3.2. A request for a new wireless colocation facility for AT&T on the rooftop of the existing Elks Lodge building, 211 E. Chapman Avenue (Design Review No. 5152-24). Item 3.2 was removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration by Committee Member Lopez. Committee Member Lopez requested clarification from the applicant regarding 5G electromagnetic emissions. Page 1 of 2

Design Review Committee Minutes - Final October 2, 2024 Public Speakers: The following spoke on behalf of the project: Sonal Thakur, Applicant Representative. ACTION: A motion was made by Committee Member Grosse, seconded by Committee Member Ledesma, to approve Design Review No. 5152-24 with staff recommended conditions. The motion carried by the following vote: Grosse, Ledesma, Lopez, and SkorpanichAyes: NoneNoes: Farfan, and McDermottAbsent: Approval of the Consent Calendar Item 3.2 was removed from the Consent Calendar and heard separately. All other items were approved as recommended. A motion was made by Committee Member Grosse, seconded by Committee Member Ledesma, to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote: Grosse, Ledesma, Lopez, and SkorpanichAyes: NoneNoes: Farfan, and McDermottAbsent: 4. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:37 p.m. The next Regular Design Review Committee meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 16, 2024 at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber. /s/Chad Ortlieb Chad Ortlieb Principal Planner Page 2 of 2

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
AgendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Budget documentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Official pages

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Design Review Committee — Minutes

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • A transcript is not available.
  • No audio or video recording is linked.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: 90e0dcb5d59caed8ca995fa708468c2e. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record