Code Enforcement Board

DUNFZ DIN Home of Honeymoon Island MINUTES OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 7, 2024 CITY HALL, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE, 2:00 PM CITY OF DUNEDIN PRESENT: Chair Ken Carson , Vice Chair Phil Stone , Michael Dave Pauley, Jason Gillette, Victoria Butler, Dan Bolduc and Matthew Wielinski ABSENT: Sally Caron and Bunny Dutton (W/Excuse) ALSO PRESENT: Assistant City Attorney Noah Daiker, Secretary to the Board Joan McHale, Code Compliance Supervisor Julie Phillips, Code Compliance Inspector Michelle Gilbert, Code Compliance Inspector Rachel Laurel, Pinellas County Sheriff Deputy Sews and four attendees. CALL TO ORDER Chair Carson called the meeting to order at 2:00 P. M. and explained the purpose of th is Board and meeting procedures to those in attendance. CITIZEN INPUT - None Opportunity for the Public to address the Board 1. CONSENT AGENDA 1.a. Approval of Draft Minutes for the April 2, 2024 Code Enforcement Board Meeting MOTION: Mr. Gillette moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of April 2, 2024. Second was made by Ms. Butler. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 2. TESTIMONY OATH OF STAFF AND PUBLIC Ms. McHale swore in Code Compliance Supervisor Julie Phillips , Code Compliance Inspector Michelle Gilbert, Code Compliance Inspector Rachel Laurel and all others wish in g to speak. 3. AFFIDAVITS OF COMPLIANCE - None to Report 4. OLD BUSINESS - None to Report 1

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 5. NEW BUSINESS Dunedin Code Enforcement Board 5.a. Case 24-13 City vs MICHAEL F YANNICH & CHRISTINE TRIPP 1452 SEASPRAY LANE Violation of the International Property Maintenance Code Section 302.7 Accessory Structures Chair Carson determined no one was present for this case. Code Compliance Supervisor Phillips reviewed Case No . 24-13: Case Summary The property is a single family home in the R-60 Zoning District International Property Maintenance Code Section 302 .7 Accessory Structures All accessory structures, including detached garages , fences and walls, shall be maintained structurally sound and in good repair. Notice of Violation was sent Certified Mail to the property owner on February 26 , 2024. Compliance Date: April 6, 2024 Certified Mail Delivery Confirmation was returned unclaimed on April 1, 2024. Property was posted in City Hal with an Affidavit of Posting and a second Notice of Violation on April 4, 2024 with a new compliance date of April 14, 2024. Posted the property and City Hall with an Affidavit of Hearing on April 16, 2024. The rear fence facing Falcon Drive is in disrepair, slats are missing , a portion of the fence has come apart. On April 4, 2024 a second Notice of Violation was posted on the door; there had been no repair to the fence . On April 15, 2024 Notice of Hearing was posted at the property; nothing had been done to repair the fence. On May 6, 2024 there was still no corrective action. She has spoken to the owner who told her that he was coming in to make application for a permit; however, that has not happened to date. The person who is to be repairing fence called her and said he will be fixing the fence, but there is still no permit and no corrective action has been taken . Staff Recommendation Requesting compliance on or before June 7, 2024 or given the severity of the violation is minor a fine of $150.00 per day the violation continues to exist. Board Questions When Mr. Bolduc asked if the respondent was made aware the application for permit is to be made online , Ms. Phillips advised she has explained that to the respondent. When asked if compliance is obtaining the permit or repairing the fence , Ms. Phillips stated the fence is in disrepair and needs to be replaced after obtaining the permit. MOTION: Vice Chair Stone moved to find Case No. 24-13 , property owner, Michael F. Yannich and Christine Tripp, property address 1452 Seaspray Lane in violation of the International Property Maintenance Code Section 302 .7 Accessory Structures and that the Respondents 2

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 VOTE: Dunedin Code Enforcement Board shall come into compliance by June 7, 2024 or suffer a fine of $150.00 per day thereafter until compliance. Second was made by Mr. Pauley. Motion carried with Ms. Butler, Messrs. Gillette , Pauley, Bolduc, Stone and Chair Carson voting aye. Voting nay, none. Chair Carson reviewed the Finding and Order of the Board . 5.b. Case 24-85 City vs DANA BLACK 1327 DINNER BELL LANE E Violation of the Land Development Code Section 105-27.1.1.1 (F) (5) Utility Trailers, Boats, RVs and other Recreational Equipment Standards Violation of the Land Development Code Section 105-27 .1.1.1 (H)1 (6) Front Yard Standards/Front Yard Restrictions Chair Carson determined no one was present for this case. Code Compliance Supervisor Phillips reviewed Case No .24-85 Case Summary This property is a single family home located in the R-60 zoning district. This property is now in compliance and Declaration of Violation is being requested . Violation of the Florida Building Code Section 105-27.1.1.1 (F) Utility Trailers, Boats, RVs and other Recreational Equipment Standards (5) No utility trailers, boats or other recreational equipment and recreational vehicles shall be located between the minimum setbacks established in Chapter 103 Zoning unless screened by a six-foot privacy fence . Violation of the Land Development Code Section 105-27.1.1.1 (H)1 (6) Front Yard Standards/Front Yard Restrictions (6) For additional front yard parking , residents may improve up to a 9' wide area adjacent to the primary driveway. Parking in any other part of the front yard is prohibited . Notice of Violation sent Certified Mail to the property owner on February 12, 2024 . Compliance Date : February 22 , 2024 A second Notice of Violation was sent on March 19, 2024 Compliance Date : April 2, 2024 Certified Mail Delivery Confirmation was received for the first Notice of Violation on February 15, 2024 at 2:58 p.m. Certified Mail Delivery Confirmation was received for the second Notice of Violation on March 25, 2024 at 4:12 p.m . The property and City Hall were posted with an Affidavit of Posting and Notice for today's hearing on April 12, 2024 There are 2 violations at this property complaint driven by a neighbor who stated the golf cart has always been in the garage. The owner took it out to make an office which is allowed ; but they decided to park it next to the fence line in the yard . The golf cart was noted on February 9, 12 , 20, 2024 ; March 1, 6, 11, 12, 18, 28 , 2024 ; April 4, 2024 . The property was posted for today's hearing on April 12, 2024; it was on the mail box because at the front door there was a dog. The cart was still parked there on April 12 3

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 and 18, 2024. Dunedin Code Enforcement Board On April 23, 2024 the owner put some blocks down and the golf cart is now in compliance on blocks. Staff Recommendation For the two violations that are currently in compliance, a Declaration of Violation that any future violations of any of these same ordinances within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and subject to up to a $500.00 per day fine. Board Questions - None MOTION: Vice Chair Stone moved to find Case No . 24-85 property owner Dana Black, property address 1327 Dinner Bell Lane E was in violation after the requested compliance date of April 2, 2024 of the Land Development Code Section 105-27 .1 .1 .1 (F) Utility Trailers, Boats, RVs and other Recreational Equipment Standards and the Land Development Code Section 105-27.1. 1.1 (H)1 (6) Front Yard Standards/Front Yard Restrictions and is now in compliance, no fines are being imposed. This Declaration of Violation serves as notice if any future violations of any of these same ordinances within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and subject to an immediate fine up to $500.00 per day fine. Second was made by Ms. Butler. VOTE: Motion carried with Ms. Butler, Messrs. Gillette, Pauley, Bolduc, Stone and Chair Carson voting aye. Voting nay, none . Chair Carson reviewed the Finding and Order of the Board . 5.c. Case 24-103 City vs CHRIS & CARISSA SUGG 2677 ST JOSEPHS DRIVE E #A Violation of the Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Prohibition Chair Carson determined no one was present for this case. Code Compliance Supervisor Phillips reviewed Case No.24-103. Case Summary This property is now in compliance and Declaration of Violation is being requested . The address of the respondents is 14827 Tutter Chase Drive , Tampa, FL. The property is a condominium located in the MF-15 zoning district. Violation of the Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Prohibition Rentals under three months in duration are not allowed in res idential neighborhoods or other districts not specifically allowing for such uses. Rentals of less than three months must be located in zoning districts specifically (not by implication) providing for such transient and commercial uses. Notice of Violation was sent Certified Mail to the property owner on April 8, 2024 Compliance Date : April 22 , 2024 4

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Electronic Certified Mail Delivery Confirmation received April 11 , 2024 at 12:13 p.m . The property and City Hall were posted with an Affidavit of Posting and Notice for today's hearing April 25, 2024 Th is property is listed on Airbnb as a 2-night minimum stay; she tried to book from June 1 to June 3; she was taken to the payment page on April 8, 2024 She went back to the website on April 24 , 2024 where it was still advertised ; she tried to book for June 1 to July 1; she was taken to the payment page The property was posted with Notice of Hearing April 25 , 2024 She spoke with Mr. Sugg who was somewhat horrified and had no idea that he could not rent the unit for less than 90 days , so he did take down the site immediately. When she was on social media she did see this posted two days ago that said, anyone looking for a 3-6 month furnished rental on the Causeway direct gulf front, 2 bedroom to please message him for details so, he is trying to do the right thing. Staff Recommendation Request for Declaration of Violation and that any future violation of any of these same ordinances within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and subject to up to a $500.00 per day fine . Board Questions - None MOTION: Ms. Butler moved to find Case No. 24-103 property owner Chris and Carissa Sugg , property address 2677 St. Josephs Drive #A was in violation after the requested compliance date of April 22 , 2024 of the City of Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts Prohibition and is now in compliance , no fines are being imposed . The Declaration of Violation order serves as notice that any future violation of any of this same ordinance within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and subject to up to a $500.00 per day fine . Second was made by Mr. Gillette. VOTE: Motion carried with Ms. Butler, Messrs. Gillette , Pauley, Bolduc, Stone and Chair Carson voting aye. Voting nay, none . Chair Carson reviewed the Finding and Order of the Board . 5.d. Case 24-104 City vs PATRICIA HOOVER 1117 MICHIGAN DRIVEN Violation of the Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Prohibition Chair Carson determined no one was present for this case . Code Compliance Supervisor Phillips reviewed Case No . 24-104 Case Summary This property is now in compliance and Declaration of Violation is being requested . The property is a single family home located in the MF zoning district. 5

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Violation of the Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Prohibition Rentals under three months in duration are not allowed in residential neighborhoods or other districts not specifically allowing for such uses. Rentals of less than three months must be located in zoning districts specifically (not by implication) providing for such transient and commercial uses. Notice of Violation was sent Certified Mail to the property owner on April 8, 2024 Compliance Date : April 22, 2024 Signed Certified Mail Delivery Confirmation received on April 11 , 2024 at 10:47 a.m. The property and City Hall were posted with an Affidavit of Posting and Notice for today's hearing April 25 , 2024 The property was advertised on Vrbo, a sign indicates rented by month only, not per night. In this district rentals are only for 90 days or more, not less She tried to book the property from May 1 to 31 ; she was taken to the payment page. She went back to the website on April 24, 2024 and tried to book from May 1 to May 22 ; she was taken to the payment page. She found another portion for listing that said rented by month only, not per night; she found another portion of the site that says it is a Dunedin house which indicates a 1- day policy at this home . The property was posted for today's hearing on April 25 , 2024 She went back to the website on May 6, 2024 and the advertisement had been changed to 90 nights Ms. Hoover was in attendance; however, realizes she was in violation and did make the correction so did not stay at the meeting . Staff Recommendation Request for Declaration of Violation and that any future violation of any of these same ordinances within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and ·subject to up to a $500.00 per day fine . Board Questions - None MOTION: Vice Chair Stone moved to find Case No . 24-104 property owner Patricia Hoover, property address 1117 Michigan Drive N was in violation after the requested compliance date of April 22 , 2024 of the City of Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts Prohibition and is now in compliance , no fines are being imposed . The Declaration of Violation order serves as notice that any future violation of this same ordinance within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and subject to up to a $500.00 per day fine. Second was made by Ms. Butler. 6

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 VOTE: Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Motion carried with Ms. Butler, Messrs. Gillette, Pauley, Bolduc, Stone and Chair Carson voting aye. Voting nay, none . Chair Carson reviewed the Finding and Order of the Board . 5.e. Case 24-117 City vs ROELL, MATTHEW G & ROELL, KELLY C TRE 2673 ST JOSEPHS DR E REPEAT Violation of the Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.8.1 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Conditional Use Bed & Breakfast; Intent Chair Carson determined there was a representative present for this case. Code Compliance Supervisor Phillips reviewed Case No. 24-104 Case Summary The address of the respondents is 1419 Primwood Lane , Lutz, FL This property is a 4-plex located in the MF-15 zoning district. REPEAT Violation of the Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.8.1 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Conditional Use Bed & Breakfast; Intent It is unlawful for any owner of any property within the multi-family zoning districts of the City of Dunedin to operate a bed and breakfast without obtaining a conditional use permit from the City's Board of Adjustment and Appeal. Without an approved Conditional Use Permit from the Board of Adjustment and Appeal the zoning district may only rent 90 days or 3 calendar months whichever is more. F .S .162.04 - Definition of a "Repeat Violation" "Repeat Violation" means a violation of a provision of a code or ordinance by a person who has been previously found through a code enforcement board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process, to have violated or who has admitted violating the same provision within 5 years prior to the violation , notwithstanding the violations occur at different locations. On March 7, 2023 Case 23-900 was brought before the Dunedin Code Enforcement Board for an illegal short term rental. The respondent Matthew Roell was present. The Board found the respondent in violation of Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103- 14.8.1 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Conditional Use Bed & Breakfast. The respondent was given until March 20, 2023 to comply or suffer a fine in the amount of $250.00 for each day the violation continued to exist. The respondent complied. Any future violation of any of this same ordinance within five (5) years by the same property owner will be considered a Repeat Violation and subject to up to a $500 .00 per day fine . During a routine inspection on Host Compliance she observed 2673 St. Joseph Dr E advertised as a 4-night minimum stay instead of the 90-day or 3 calendar months requirement by Code. The property and City Hall were posted with an Affidavit of Posting and Notice of Repeat Violation and Notice for today's hearing on April 10, 2024. Notice of Repeat Violation was sent Certified Mail to the property owner 7

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Electronic Certified Mail Delivery Confirmation received April 13 , 2024 at 11 :25 a.m. The Airbnb ad was on April 10, 2024 , when clicked to book it showed a 4-night minimum stay; she tried to book the property June 2 - June 6 and was taken to the payment page . She went to the host, Kelly where it showed there were two stays in April. She spoke with Mr. Roell and explained she could see he was in violation again and for that day it would be $500.00 and he said if she saw anything else to please call him. She posted the property. When she went back to the Airbnb on Aprile 11 the website was turned off and all the dates were blocked out and she could not see any future bookings. Future months were blocked out. On April 18 , 2024 the website was turned back on; she tried to book it and it said again a minimum stay of 4 nights ; she tried to book it for May 26 - May 31 and was taken to the payment page . On April 19 the same listing was there and she tried to book May 26 - 30 and was taken to the payment page. She decided to look at future dates and found weeks blocked out in future months which should not be if the rental is for 90 days or more . On April 22 , 2024 the website again prompted for 4 nights which she tried to book for June 2 - 6 and was taken to the payment page. On April 23, 2024 the same happened as well on April 24, 2024 for July 1 - 5; April 26, 2024 the same . Reviews indicated 2 stays in January 2024; 1 in March 2024, 2 for April. On April 29,2024 the website page was turned off again . She contacted Mr. Roell via email advising the advertisements were there again . When a website is turned off; it does not fix the issue . It is up to the owner to do that by manually setting the site for 90 day bookings. Just turning it on and off the 4-day min imum continues to stay set. Ms. Ph illips explained about the City's system Host Compliance which shows an entire map of the city. In this case it shows the respondent owning three or four of these units and the red box indicates non-compliance that they are either advertising less than allowed or they do not have a registration at which time she investigates the website . Staff Recommendation Repeat Violation - Case No. 24-117 Requesting a fine in the amount of $500.00 per day for the following dates: April 10, 2024; April 18, 2024; April 19, 2024; April 22, 2024 ; April 23, 2024; April 24, 2024 ; April 25 , 2024 and April 26, 2024 for a total of $4 ,000. Respondent Comments Matthew Roell of 1419 Primwood Lane, Lutz, FL was sworn in by Board Secretary Ms. McHale and stated: He was here a year ago about the same time. They have been trying to set up their properties . They started doing vacation rentals back in 2008, the building that was shown today was a foreclosure that was completely trashed and he was only 25% owner at the time . Along with his partners they cleaned the property up , put in a dock and started 8

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 Dunedin Code Enforcement Board doing vacation rentals. They did that for many years and he began buying out some of his partners and ended up with the entire building . They did vacation rentals for years and then Dunedin came and told them they were in violation . He tried to work with the City at the time to get it rezoned . The property is on the water. He owns the duplex across the street which is Tourist Facility that allows for vacation rentals; but those are not on the water. This is not a residential area . The other person who had property there had to stop doing vacation rentals. There were multiple buildings all doing vacation rentals with everyone wanting to do that, maybe one person that had a run down building next to his duplex that was not a vacation rental. He is aware there is nothing this Board can do about the law and the zoning . The big issue for him has been the waterfront property that was flooded during the last hurricane; he had to have his dock redone and other repairs. The insurance on the water is super expensive; their property taxes went from $10,000 a year to $15,000 with the property values skyrocketing. They also have commercial loans that helped to buy that and is getting ready to reset. The point is he cannot afford to run a long term rental or just have the snowbirds come and rent, although he does have some that do rent for 90 days in the spring and winter, but he cannot afford to run a business like that. The long term rentals cannot afford enough to pay for the insurance and everything else with the current interest rates. He had someone who worked for him to list it and fill in the gaps ; if he can get a 90- day rental that is great and he was trying to fill the gaps. It is against the rules; however, he would say basically where he is now, that building is probably going to end up being for sale. Ms. Phillips has been very professional about the situation and warned him and he broke the rules. He would say anything the Board can do to help him with the payment and they will take everything down ; hopefully it is down now and mostly it has been since April 29 th . He has to find a plan to get longer rentals for 90 days and maybe people can try to get it rezoned , because for long term rentals he does not know how anyone can afford to do the financials unless the property values come down . He would appreciate anything the Board could do about the fines , which he did not come today prepared to pay. Board Questions Vice Chair Stone noted the recommended fine is for 8 days at $500.00 per day and asked Mr. Roell asked since the beginning of the calendar year how many days has he rented the property. Mr. Roell stated he did not know, but mainly this year it has been the seasonals that come in January and leave in early April , mainly 90-day rentals . Vice Chair Stone noted the exhibits submitted indicate they were charging per night. Ms. Phillips stated she did not think it was about per night, but offering a 4-night minimum stay, when this property is can only be rented 90 days or more so, the advertising to book states you must stay a minimum of 4 nights so, the price was not anything , just that it was taking her to the payment page to book for 4 or 5 days and showing that was allowed. 9

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Vice Chair Stone asked from January through March did Mr. Roell rent it to the same person or persons and he responded , yes he did. Vice Chair Stone noted then the violations began in April and Mr. Roell stated he was trying to fill in the gaps. Vice Chair Stone verified with Ms. Phillips that is why she was referencing only the April dates from when Host Compliance was showing it in violation, she called Mr. Roell who took the site down so , that was a repeat violation; then when she went back on Host Compliance it was giving the button indicating it was being rented again and she tried to book every day because it should never say 4 nights; it should say 90 nights. Vice Chair Stone discussed with Mr. Roell that he had been renting this property since 2008 before Airbnb existed or Vrbo; it was through the newspaper; the whole block was vacation rentals for years and basically built up the Causeway. Vice Chair Stone verified with Mr. Roell he is not denying the violations and the recommendation is a $500 .00 a day fine for 8 days. Mr. Bolduc asked when the zoning changed; Mr. Roell explained the zoning never changed ; they just did not know back then and the people before them were renting for years before. When he bought it he only knew everyone was renting and it was his first investment property that he bought only 25% share. It was not until they were notified during the pandemic they knew. He acknowledged he did challenge the zoning , but just his building and he was told the City could not do that for just one spot of land . When Mr. Bolduc encouraged Mr. Roell to continue to push for the rezoning. Mr. Roell commented the other people are not as motivated to do that as he is . He commented as an aside he was surprised there has been no code enforcement for the property beside his duplex that has been an eyesore for years. Mr. Bolduc asked if the City's recommendation for $500.00 per day the minimum and Ms. Phillips advised for a repeat violation it is the minimum and that last year there was the same discussion of when you violate the same code within a 5-year period it becomes a repeat violation ; originally this would have been only $500.00 because she called Mr. Roell and told him about it and the turned it off, but then he turned it back on and her hands were tied there is either compliance or non-compliance; she did not charge him for the weekends otherwise it would have been $9,000.00 today. Attorney Daiker clarified that $500.00 per day is the maximum and not the minimum. Ms. Butler recalled the previous case and discussion regarding the Conditional Use Permit that was only available she recalled for the owner residing in the property and otherwise renting in this zoning district is for 90-days or more. Ms. Phillips noted Mr. Roell did go before the Board and the Commission in 2021 and it was denied so , maybe it did require more people to do that and not just one. Mr. Roell commented he understood, the rules are the rules , he has heard it before. When Chair Carson inquired when a fine is imposed does there have to be a date certain when it has to be paid , Ms. Phillips stated she did not believe there is a date certain , only that if it is not paid it becomes a lien on the property. Mr. Bolduc asked regarding a request for the fine to be lowered , less than the $4 ,000.00 , does it have to be in the motion . 10

Regular Meeting May 7, 2024 Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Attorney Daiker explained when making the motion , the Board sets the fine ; the $500.00 per day is just what City staff is recommending . The Board can make the daily fine any amount from 1 cent and up to $500 .00 if they are imposing a fine . Ms. Butler asked if the Board does impose a fine and the violation continues is it a lien for that amount or is there another penalty. Ms. Phillips explained should the respondent chooses to violate again in the future he will be brought back to the Board as a repeat violation , every time he does it within the 5-year period . There has to be compliance. Vice Chair Stone clarified with Ms . Phillips she indicated she did give the benefit of the doubt and did not asses fines for the weekend periods . Ms. Phillips explained on April 10th when it was $500.00 she was trying to be nice and he shut it off; turned it down ; then on the 18 th he turned it on again and when she is recommending the fine now she is not including Saturdays and Sundays which she considers to be incredibly lenient; but she would let the Board make their own decision. MOTION: Vice Chair Stone moved to find in Case No.24-117 property owner Matthew G Roell and Kelly C, TRE, property address 2673 St. Joseph Dr E was in repeat violation of Dunedin Code of Ordinances Section 103-14.8.1 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Conditional Use Bed & Breakfast; Intent and is currently in compliance and that the Respondent shall suffer a total fine of $4 ,000.00 from when the violation was first observed for the dates as stated by the Inspector, April 10, 18 , 19, 22 , 23, 24 , 25 , and 26, 2024 . Second was made by Mr. Pauley. VOTE: Motion carried with Ms. Butler, Ms. Messrs. Gillette , Pauley, Bolduc, Stone and Chair Carson voting aye . Voting nay, none. Cha ir Carson reviewed the Finding and Order of the Board . 6. OTHER BUSINESS 6.a. Attorney Comments - None 6. b. City Staff Comments 6.c. Board Comments - None 6.d. Chair Carson announced the next Code Enforcement Meeting of June 11 , 2024 at 2:00 p.m. ADJOURN Meeting adjourned at 3:01 P. M. NOTE: This meeting was reco~ .7:::_,e a part of the official file . , 4C:P2 Ken Carson , Chair Dunedin Code Enforcement Board 11

1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD City Hall, 737 Louden Avenue MAY 07, 2024 2:00 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN INPUT Opportunity for the Public to address the Board 1. CONSENT AGENDA 1.a. Review and approval of Draft Minutes to April 2, 2024 Code Enforcement Board meeting. Review & Approve EXHIBIT: Draft Minutes 4-2-24 CEB.pdf 2. TESTIMONY OATH OF STAFF AND PUBLIC Swearing in of all staff and public who wish to provide testimony 3. AFFIDAVITS OF COMPLIANCE 4. OLD BUSINESS 5. NEW BUSINESS 5.a. Case 24-13 City vs MICHAEL F YANNICH & CHRISTINE TRIPP 1452 SEASPRAY LANE Violation of the IPMC Section 302.7 Accessory Structures Discussion EXHIBIT: NB 24-13.pdf 5.b. Case 24-85 City vs DANA BLACK 1327 DINNER BELL LANE E Violation of the FBC Section 105-27.1.1.1(F) Utility Trailers, Boats, RVs and other

2 Recreational Equipment Standards Violation of the FBC Section 105-27.1.1.1(H)1(6) Front Yard Standards/Front Yard Restrictions Discussion EXHIBIT: NB 24-85.pdf 5.c. Case 24-103 City vs CHRIS & CARISSA SUGG 2677 ST JOSEPHS DRIVE E #A Violation of the DCO Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Prohibition Discussion EXHIBIT: 2024-04-25 NOH 24-103.pdf EXHIBIT: 2024-04-08 NOV 24-103.pdf EXHIBIT: 2024-04-25 AP 24-103.pdf EXHIBIT: MAILINGS.pdf 5.d. Case 24-104 City vs PATRICIA HOOVER 1117 MICHIGAN DRIVE N Violation of the DCO Section 103-14.4 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Prohibition Discussion EXHIBIT: 24-04-08 NOV 24-104.pdf EXHIBIT: 24-05-07 NOH.pdf EXHIBIT: 24-04-25 AP.pdf EXHIBIT: MAILINGS 24-104.pdf 5.e. Case 24-117 City vs ROELL, MATTHEW G & ROELL, KELLY C TRE 1419 PRIMWOOD LANE REPEAT Violation of the DCO Section 103-14.8.1 Transient Uses Within Certain Zoning Districts; Conditional Use Bed & Breakfast; Intent Discussion EXHIBIT: NB 24-117.pdf 6. OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURN Disability Provisions: It is the policy of the City of Dunedin not to discriminate against disabled persons in employment or the provisions of services. If you have a disability that requires accommodation, please notify the ADA Coordinator 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting at (727) 298-3043. Appeals: Per Florida Statute 286.0105 - If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.

3 COPIES OF THIS AND ALL COMMISSION AGENDAS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 737 LOUDEN AVENUE, ON THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE. COPIES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT WWW.DUNEDINGOV.COM.