02/04/26 Agenda - Charter Review Advisory Committee

CITY OF LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA Minutes – Charter Review Advisory Committee WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4TH, 2026 CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING – 5:15 P.M.

**Present:** Corey Langford, Chair Ryan Scray, Vice Chair Thomas Tucker David Switzer [until 6.27pm] Chris Lightfoot, Interim City Manager Amy Myers, City Attorney

**Apologies:** James Marler

**Item #1. Call to Order** The Chair called the meeting to order at 5.15 pm and asked Mr. Lightfoot to call the roll. Motion by Tucker to excuse Marler’s absence. Second to the Motion: Scray On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 4-0

**Item #2. Additions, Deletions, Modifications of Agenda** The Chair called for any Additions, Deletions, Modifications of the Agenda. Motion by Scray to switch items 4&5 to after 6&7. Second to the Motion: Tucker On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 4-0 Motion by Scray to add after Item 3 to discuss the verbiage for the clerk position and discuss deliverables timeframe to present to the commission. Second to the Motion: Switzer On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 4-0

**Item #3. Approval of minutes of 01/21/26** The Chair called for a motion to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held on 01/21/26. Motion by Scray to approve the minutes of 01/21/26. Second to the Motion: Switzer On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 4-0

**Item # 4. To discuss the verbiage for the clerk position and discuss deliverables timeframe to present to the commission** Mr. Scray spoke about the commission discussion at the last commission meeting about clerk ballot language and timeframe for the special election. * They would like to move forward and have the language finalized for the clerk’s position. * Mr. Scray is hesitant to put forward any other section until the charter is fully finalized. The decisions made as a committee after the clerk issue is finally decided will be dependent on whether there will or won’t be a clerk. * Dates: May (special – March 20th deadline for commission to call for a referendum), August (primary), November mid-terms (General). Further discussion ensued. By March 20th the committee will have to complete ballot language by end of next meeting for any items to send to the commission. Mr. Switzer – what is the process? Do we send items when the commission asks for it or when the committee is ready to send items to them? * Chairman Langford – the committee should attempt to meet the deadlines the commission asks for. Once the commission receives it, they will review it and may send it back to the committee for further development. * The committee needs directions from the commission about when they want the deliverables. Chairman Lanford asked Mr. Lightfoot to have add agenda item to the next commission meeting to ask the Commission to decide and inform the committee of dates for specific items. (Ms. Myers suggested doing this before the Arc presentation item). Mr. Scray’s preference is the AI generated 74-word option (the clerk independence version) Mr. Tucker – if we go with this and they want clerk/treasurer will the language have to change? Ms. Myers – that specifically can be changed by resolution. Chairman Langford – prefers “hired” rather than appointed. Ms. Myers – yes, they want that power to hire – to change the word appointed to hire. * Mr. Switzer – need to start with “serving as the city’s official custodian and record keeper” ... “hired and compensated by and reporting directly to the city commission” After further discussion the verbiage was decided on: *Shall the City Charter be amended to create the office of City Clerk, hired and compensated by and reporting to the City Commission, serving as the City’s official custodian and record-keeper, responsible for maintaining ordinances, resolutions, minutes, contracts, and public documents; managing public records requests; preparing meeting minutes; administering oaths; overseeing municipal elections as required by law; and performing these duties independently in accordance with state law, City policies, and direction from the City Commission?* * Ms. Myers will put this into the form of a resolution and bring it back to the next committee meeting (18th) to discuss and vote on. * She should be able to finalize these in the first meeting in March to send to the commission.

**Item # 5. Review and confirm updates recommended for Article I Sec. 6B-1 through Sec. 6C-2b (was item 6)** Discussion ensued. To continue the review at the next meeting.

**Item #6. Continue the Review of Article I from Sec. 6C-3 (was 7)** The committee concurred to table considering and updating Article I from Sec. 6C-3 seeing as only three members remain. Motion by Scray to table item 6 as only 3 members remain Second by Tucker On Vote: All in favor 3/0

**Item #7. Tabled from last meeting - Discussion about Mr. Scray’s request to add “Citizens’ Rights Guarantee” (was 4)** Mr. Scray – discussed his paper. Recommended putting on the ballot for April 2027 to add to the Charter.

**Item #8. Tabled from last meeting - Discuss when Mr. Switzer’s request to add “Governing in a Digital Age” (was 5)** Motion by Scray Tabled to the next meeting in the absence of Mr. Switzer. Second by Tucker On Vote: All in favor 3/0

**Item #9. Public Commentary (was 8)** Lorraine Reeder – Came to speak about the Citizens’ Rights Guarantee” and feels an appeal process is a good idea in dealing with citizen’s rights. She said she thinks there is a need for arbitration avenues for residents considering issues she has been having in dealing with various staff at various departments. Mr. Tucker asked Ms. Myers if an arbitration method could work. * Ms. Myers – there are avenues in the city code for such mediation.

**Item #10. Next Meeting (was 9)** The Chair confirmed the next meeting is set for 02/18/26 at 5.15pm and all agreed on 03/11/26 at 5.15pm for the first meeting in March.

**Item #11. Adjourn (was 10)** There being no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 7.03P.M.

APPROVED THIS 18th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026. [Signature] Corey Langford, Chairman

ATTEST: [Signature] Chris Lightfoot, Interim City Manager prepared by CJ Rushing

CITY OF LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA AGENDA Interim City Manager Chris LightfootCommissioners Sam Peebles | Pat Perno | Jamie Warrick | Judy Tinder City Attorney Amy Myers Mayor Dave Lowery NOTICE CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE – WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4TH, 2026 – 5:15 P.M. WALTER T. KELLEY CHAMBERS – CITY HALL - 825 OHIO AVENUE THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AGENDA Item 1. Call to order. 2. Additions, Deletions, Modifications of Agenda. 3. Approval of Minutes dated 01/21/2026. 4. Tabled from Last meeting - Discussion about Mr. Scray’s request to add “Citizens’ Rights Guarantee”. 5. Tabled from last meeting - Discuss when Mr. Switzer’s request to add “Governing in a Digital Age” will be added to the agenda for discussion. 6. Review and confirm updates recommended for Article I Sec. 6B-1 through Sec. 6C-2b 7. Continue the Review of Article I from Sec. 6C-3. 8. Public Comments. 9. Confirming the next meeting date and time remains February 18th at 5.15pm. 10. Adjourn. 1

Minutes – Charter Review Advisory Committee CITY OF LYNN HAVEN, FLORIDA Interim City Manager Chris LightfootCommissioners Sam Peebles | Pat Perno | Jamie Warrick | Judy Tinder City Attorney Amy Myers Mayor Dave Lowery WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21ST, 2026 CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING – 5:00 P.M. Present: Corey Langford, Chair Ryan Scray, Vice Chair Thomas Tucker David Switzer James Marler Chris Lightfoot, Interim City Manager Kevin Obos, City Attorney Apologies: None. Item #1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 5.03 pm. Item #2. Additions, Deletions, Modifications of Agenda The Chair called for any Additions, Deletions, Modifications of the Agenda. Motion by Mr. Langford to add Mayor comments to Agenda #3. Second to the Motion: Mr. Tucker On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 5-0 Motion by Mr. Scray to discuss City Manager seating position at meetings. Second to the Motion: Mr. Marler On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 5-0 Item #3. Mayor Lowery comments Various comments regarding thankfulness toward committee members. Specific to address City Clerk. Open request for support from him/commission. Re: City Clerk - afforded support for the position. Doesn’t want to wait until April 2027. Looking at Bay County referendum in April 2026 that we would be voting on. Various comments regarding the role of the City Clerk and how it relates to City administration. Accountability and transparency commentary. Mr. Lightfoot confirmed that there is access to April 21, 2026, but it will cost the city. Comments by Chair Langford, regarding the Commission discussing timing April (Super Tuesday, no LH ballot) v. August (Primary) v. November (General). Seeking feedback from the commission. Mr. Lightfoot advised that the recall election is paid for regardless. Chair asks commission to discuss their next action and if need be to return to this committee with further guidance. 2 Item 3 lnteri

Interim City Manager Chris LightfootCommissioners Sam Peebles | Pat Perno | Jamie Warrick | Judy Tinder City Attorney Amy Myers Mayor Dave Lowery Mayor Lowery spoke further on the benefits of bringing in the Clerk position via Referendum as quickly as possible. Also, commentary regarding language on Non-Ad-Valorem languages. Seeking Non-Ad-Valorem language for sunsetting these and further comments re: the same topic. Comments by Vice-Chair Scray, re: support for the commission determining the path ahead for Clerk, that there are references in the Charter where it would be nice to know if we’ll have one as it would shape how this committee moves ahead with what’s left to do. Comments by Marler, in support of the same as what Mayor Lowery and VC Scray said. Further comments by Mayor Lowery re: the role of the Clerk and relative to neighboring communities. Comments by K. Roman, administrative vs. financial roles for Clerk. VC Scray responded what the committee completed already gave the commission flexibility to determine specific job duties. Comments by Chair Langford, reaffirming the same. Various comments by several present reaffirming the same. Final comments from Mayor Lowery re: what to see on referendum and when. Item #4. Approval of minutes of 01/07/26 The Chair called for a motion to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held on 01/07/26. Motion by Mr. Scray to approve the minutes of 01/07/26. Second to the Motion: Mr. Switzer On Vote: All in favor Motion passed: 5-0 Item #4(a) . City Manager Presence / Position at the table Discussion by VC Scray re: the presence and position of the City Manager and their involvement at OUR committee meetings. Comparison between past committee, members and attendees, and this committee. Asked if any member of the committee has any issue with the City Manager being present and positioned at the table. Attorney Obos spoke up to affirm Charter requirements. Chair Langford commentary re: the topic and Chair’s responsibilities. Invitation for input when requested. No policymaking just provides insight and guidance. Perspective, etc. Item #5. Continue the Review of Article I from Sec. 6C The committee considered and updated Article I Sec. 6 up to Section 6C-1. Discussion on recap of last meetings discussion and topics. Success %. Tailoring to only those affected/assessed and vote on. Attorney Obos shared about nuisance abatement collecting non-ad-valorem. Various discussions by multiple members regarding various options, including limiting that they occur only at regular elections. Discussion from Chair Langford regarding the history of the Stormwater Program. $2M annually for consumables $700K for labor Revenue to bring in $2.6M, $100K short on this. So we’re not covering the full bill this year. Remaining required projects is $30M. 3 lnte

Interim City Manager Chris LightfootCommissioners Sam Peebles | Pat Perno | Jamie Warrick | Judy Tinder City Attorney Amy Myers Mayor Dave Lowery Wants to see real plans before pursuit of these non-ad-valorem assessments. Defined objective. Guidelines and Guardrails. VC Scray: Would we like to write in an exception for assessments affecting one specific property for collection on lawful nuisance abatement? Is there no other collection method? 6B-1 is now: All Non Ad-Valorem Assessments proposed by the City of Lynn Haven shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the City subject to the proposed assessment for approval by referendum at the next regular election for City of Lynn Haven electors. This does not apply to assessments affecting a single property for nuisance abatement costs. VC Scray: Setting a % range for success, as set by the Commission for the Referendum. At least 45% + 1 but not more than 50% + 1. Concern shared with majority being objecting. 6B-1(a): No Non Ad-Valorem Assessment shall be imposed, levied or collected without receiving approval by a minimum amount set by the Commission prior to the Referendum that is at least 45% unless a higher minimum is set, but no minimum threshold can be above 50% +1 to succeed. NOTE: Additional review of wording may be needed but the range is what we want. Adjust 6-B2(b) also needs the same change from above. 6B-3a(a): re-affirm same language by the State Index. 6C-1: Chair Langford, discussing on City not utilizing assessments for payroll of a department. This should apply to ALL assessments except for those for Fire, due to State Statues on those. Provided an example on intent with real-word application (Parks/Slides) The funds that come in can only be used for the purpose dictated in the Non Ad-Valorem referendum. VC Scray, concerns about not allowing for usage on salaries, wages, benefits, etc. Tucker wanting the same spelled out as to all the details. Chair Langford asks for input from City Manager, Lightfoot discusses restrictions. 6C-1 is redundant to State Law, Chair Langford. VC Chair Scray, change this to: 6C-1 Requirements to Bring Forth All Required Information on Referendum for Non Ad- Valorem Assessments. The City shall provide at a minimum the following information within each referendum: 1. Defined Start and End Date 2. Brief Description of Methodology of Assessment 3. Estimated Specific Cost per Year By Property (Rate) 4. Total Project Cost Annual and Overall 5. Specific Statement on Usage of Funds 6. Limit on Annual Increase 7. Specific Compliance and Oversight Requirements 4 lnte

Interim City Manager Chris LightfootCommissioners Sam Peebles | Pat Perno | Jamie Warrick | Judy Tinder City Attorney Amy Myers Mayor Dave Lowery Example Referendum Statement (≈75 words): This sidewalk assessment project shall run from October 1, 2026 through September 30, 2031. Costs are assessed annually per parcel based on linear frontage. The estimated rate is $165 per property per year. Total project cost is $495,000 annually and $2,475,000 overall. Funds may only be used for sidewalk construction, repair, and ADA compliance. Annual increases are capped at 3%. Expenditures require annual independent audit, public reporting, and City Commission approval. Short Recess at 6:49pm. Reconvenes at 6:53pm. 6C-2a remove “or temporary” 6C-2b remove entirely 6C-2c change to be 6C-2b. Item #6. Discussion about Mr. Scray’s request to add “Citizens’ Rights Guarantee” Mr. Scray – tabled to next meeting.. Item #7. Discuss when Mr. Switzer’s request to add “Governing in a Digital Age” will be added to the agenda for discussion Mr. Switzer – tabled to next meeting.. Item #8. Public Commentary There were no public in attendance. Item #9. Next Meeting The Chair confirmed the next two meetings will be set for 02/4/26 & 02/18/26 at 5.15pm Item #10. Adjourn. There being no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 7.12P.M. APPROVED THIS ____DAY OF ____________ 2026. _______________________________________ Corey Langford, Chairman ATTEST: __________________________________ Chris Lightfoot, Interim City Manager prepared by Vice Chair Scray 5 lnte

1 Cicelia Rushing From: Ryan Scray <ryan_scray@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2026 11:09 AM To: Cicelia Rushing; Chris Lightfoot; Amy E. Myers Subject: Charter Committee - Proposed S33 Citizens Rights Guarantee Follow Up Flag: Follow up Due By: Saturday, January 10, 2026 4:00 PM Flag Status: Flagged Could you please send this to my fellow board members for advance reading? Thank you. // My fellow board members, I find it imperative to consider a deeply rooted Citizens Rights Guarantee in to our charter. The importance of a Bill of Rights is understood at the Federal level, and I believe that our local governance is where it all begins. I propose the following: Section 33: Establishment of the CITIZENS RIGHTS GUARANTEE (Proposed Charter Article) Guarantee 1. Purpose The purpose of this Article is to affirm the rights of taxpayers and residents of the City of Lynn Haven to transparent, responsible, and equitable governance, and to ensure that all public funds are managed solely for the public good. Guarantee 2. Right to Fiscal Transparency (a) All city budgets, financial reports, contracts, expenditures exceeding the public bid threshold, public record requests and code enforcement complaints shall be published in a publicly accessible Citizen Online Portal no later than 30 days after submission, approval or execution, and retained for at least (1) one year unless a longer timeframe is required by law. (b) All meetings of Commission, board or committees shall be recorded with audio and video and posted online for access by the public posted online within a reasonable period, not to exceed 30 days. (c) The public shall have the right to inspect all non-exempt financial records, including vendor payments, procurement awards, and salary schedules as specifically requested within 30 days of making a request to do so. The city may limit fulfillment to digital copies uploaded to the aforementioned Citizen Online Portal free of charge if physical copies do not exist. (d) The City may satisfy the digital requirements through an existing or third-party platform approved by the Commission. Guarantee 3. Right to Public Input on Major Fiscal Decisions (a) No new tax, assessment, or fee shall be levied without a duly noticed public hearing and a majority vote of the City Commission. (b) Any proposed increase in ad valorem millage rates exceeding the rollback rate shall require at least two public hearings and a supermajority (4/5) vote of the Commission. (c) The City shall provide a plain-language "Taxpayer Impact Statement" summarizing the financial effect of all proposed rate or fee changes and provided to all residents via TRIM notices, as well as posted online. 6 Item 4

2 (d) Any funds collected in excess of the planned budgeted revenue shall be stored at the conclusion of the fiscal year in an interest bearing account until which time the Commission can host a public meeting to solicit citizen input on their proposed usage which shall include options of roll- over to the next General Fund Year, Refund to the Citizens in the Form of a Utility Account Credit for taxpayers, or specific items proposed by the department heads of the city. Guarantee 4. Right to Responsible Debt, Spending and Investment (a) The City shall not incur bonded debt exceeding 10 percent of the total assessed value of taxable property without voter approval. (b) Capital projects exceeding $2 million (or as adjusted upward by ordinance) shall include a published cost-benefit analysis and long-term maintenance plan before authorization. (c) Unspent funds from any specific voter- approved purpose shall not be diverted to other uses without public notice and a public hearing. (d) The City shall maintain an active Investment Policy that meets all Florida statutes and is managed in the best interest of the taxpayer as determined by the Commission with advice of the Financial Review Committee. Guarantee 5. Right to Equal and Fair Treatment (a) No neighborhood, development, or district shall receive preferential treatment in infrastructure, maintenance, or assessments unless justified by objective criteria adopted by ordinance. (b) All developer contributions, credits, or waivers shall be disclosed publicly and applied consistently under city policy. (c) All citizens shall be afforded the same opportunity to speak at Public Meetings, be considered for Citizen Governance Committees and Boards, as well as being afforded the right to do business with the city provided all legal requirements are met. (d) all private donations or non-business contributions in actuality or via credits on projects shall be posted to Citizen Portal. Guarantee 6. Right to Independent Oversight (a) The City’s annual audit report shall be presented publicly, posted online, and include a plain-language executive summary. (b) The City shall conduct at least biennial employee climate surveys through an independent third party to ensure an efficient and productive climate for employment within the city, subject to budget appropriation. (c) Any finding of misuse of taxpayer funds shall trigger a mandatory public review by a third party auditor (may be fulfille d by City Clerk acting independently of the City Manager) and corrective action report within 60 days, subject to annual budget appropriation. Guarantee 7. Right to Ethical and Accountable Governance (a) All elected and appointed officials shall annually disclose any conflicts of interest and certify compliance with the Florida Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees. (b) City employees and officials are fiduciaries of the taxpayers and must act with honesty, prudence, and loyalty to the public interest. (c) No taxpayer funds shall be used for personal benefit, political activity, or non-public purposes. Guarantee 8. Right to Redress (a) Any taxpayer may file a written petition for review of alleged violations of this Article. (b) The City Commission shall respond in writing or hold a public hearing within 60 days. (c) Citizens shall have standing to seek declaratory or injunctive relief in circuit court for violations of this Article. Guarantee 9. Amendment Protection This Article may not be repealed, amended, or superseded except by a majority vote of the electorate at a regular or special election. Guarantee 10. Guarantee of Essential Public Services (a) The City of Lynn Haven shall ensure the continuous provision of essential public services necessary for the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, including but not limited to: - Police protection and public safety - Fire protection and emergency response - Potable water supply and sewer service - Solid waste collection and disposal - Stormwater management and drainage - Maintenance of public streets and associated infrastructure necessary for emergency access (b) The City shall not reduce, contract for operation or management, suspend, or materially alter the delivery of these essential services without: 7

3 (1) A published public analysis detailing the fiscal and operational impacts (2) A duly noticed public hearing (3) A supermajority (4/5) vote of the City Commission (c) In the event of a declared emergency or disaster, the City shall prioritize continuity of these services and establish public contingency plans to ensure uninterrupted operations. (d) The rights guaranteed under this section shall not be suspended, delegated, or diminished through contract, budgetary omission, or administrative action. (e) These essential services are declared to be core functions of municipal government. The City Commission shall treat their funding, staffing, and maintenance as first-order budget priorities. Guarantee 11. Right to Movement and Local Mobility (a) Declaration of Rights. Residents and visitors of the City of Lynn Haven have a fundamental right to safe, practical, and non-motor-vehicle- exclusive movement throughout the City. This right includes the use of pedestrian travel, bicycles, golf carts, and low- speed vehicles (LSVs) on City streets where permitted by state law. (b) Policy of Multimodal Access. It is the policy of the City to remain a community that supports multimodal transportation. The City shall maintain, protect, and where feasible expand safe access for pedestrians, cyclists, golf carts, and LSVs on local streets, pathways, and connectors. (c) Preservation of Access. Existing areas, corridors, and routes where pedestrian, bicycle, golf-cart, or LSV travel is permitted at the time of adoption of this Charter shall remain authorized unless modified pursuant to the procedures in this section. (d) Speed Management and Road Design. To preserve safe multimodal access, the City shall: (a) prioritize lower speed limits on local residential streets and corridors not designated as state or federal highways; (b) ensure posted speeds are compatible with shared use by pedestrians, bicycles, golf carts, and LSVs; and (c) incorporate traffic-calming and multimodal safety design considerations into all roadway design, resurfacing, and reconstruction projects. (e) Restriction or Removal of Access. No ordinance or action that prohibits or substantially restricts pedestrian, bicycle, golf-cart, or LSV use on City streets, other than on major state- or county-controlled highways where such use is legally limited, shall take effect unless it: (a) is supported by a publicly noticed safety or engineering study; (b) undergoes two publicly advertised hearings; and (c) is approved by a supermajority vote of four-fifths (4/5) of the City Commission or approved by referendum. (f) Citizens’ Petition Protection. Any ordinance restricting multimodal access adopted under subsection (5) may be subjected to the citizen referendum process provided in this Charter. Upon certification of a valid petition, such ordinance shall be suspended until voter approval. (g) Obligation to Plan for Connectivity. The City shall evaluate and, where feasible, provide pedestrian, bicycle, golf-cart, and LSV connectivity to parks, schools, neighborhoods, commercial districts, and other community destinations as part of all long-range transportation planning efforts. End of Proposed. // I am open for discussion at any of our meetings regarding the specifics to be included, as this is only an initial draft. Thank you. Ryan Scray 8

1 Cicelia Rushing From: David Switzer <david.switzer@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 11:02 AM To: Cicelia Rushing Subject: Charter Review Agenda Item - Governing In a Digital Age Hello Please forward this to the other members of the charter review group. Hello All! When Pat asked me to be part of the review committee he asked that I review the current charter and find out where I can add the most value to ensure our city charter is modern. Our charter currently does not have language governing the control and use of technology by the city. Technological hardware married with AI has escalated technology past current state and federal law at a rate never seen before. Please read the below so we can discuss the topic at the next meeting. Section X.X — Governing in a Digital Age The City recognizes that advancing technologies may enhance public safety and efficiency, but also carry the risk of undue government intrusion into the private lives of the people. Accordingly, the City shall govern the use of emerging technologies in a manner consistent with the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida, with particular regard for the rights to privacy, due process, and freedom from unreasonable searches and surveillance. No City department, officer, or agent shall deploy, operate, or participate in the use of surveillance or data-collection technologies—including but not limited to unmanned aerial systems (drones or UAVs), license plate recognition systems (LPRs), biometric identification tools, or similar technologies— except as expressly authorized by ordinance duly adopted by the City Commission. 9 Item 5

2 Such authorization shall, at a minimum, require: 1. A clearly defined public purpose and scope of use; 2. Limits on data collection, retention, access, and sharing; 3. Independent oversight and accountability measures; 4. Transparency sufficient to inform the public of the technology’s use and safeguards; and 5. Compliance with all applicable constitutional, statutory, and judicial requirements. The City shall not employ technology in a manner that results in generalized, indiscriminate, or suspicion less surveillance of the public, nor shall technological capability alone be deemed justification for its use. I look forward to the discussion. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 10

CHT 1 PART I CHARTER* Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 6A. Sec. 7. Sec. 8. Sec. 9. Sec. 9A. Sec. 10. Sec. 11. Sec. 11A. Sec. 12. Sec. 13. Sec. 14. Sec. 15. Sec. 16. Sec. 17. Sec. 18. Sec. 19. Article I. In General Existing municipality abolished. Title to property reserved to new municipality. Contracts remain binding. New municipality created. Boundaries. Powers vested in Commission; designating manner of exercise; abandoned property; payment of ad valorem taxes. [Reserved.] Same-Generally. Same-Police power; general penalty. General laws to apply. Charter Review. Article II. City Commission Form of government. Creation; election of members; term limits. Mayor Commissioner and Commissioner Compensation. Qualifications of members; prohibited interest in City contracts; prohibiting former members from employment. [Reserved.] Judge of own elections; felony convictions. Vacancies. General law governing City Councils extended to Commissioners. Mayor-Construed. Same-Functions and duties. Advisory Boards. *Editor's note--This compilation consists of the Charter, Laws of Fla. (1951), ch. 27685, and all subsequent acts relating to the City of Lynn Haven including Laws of Fla. (1933), ch. 16536, and Laws of Fla. (1937), ch. 18668, which were apparently not superseded by Laws of Fla. (1951), ch. 18668. A comparative table will be found immediately following the Charter which shows the disposi