POLISCOPE

The public record

LINCOLN (SACRAMENTO COUNTY)Decisions and attributed speech publishedPartial coverage

Planning Commission Regular Meeting

Wednesday, February 18, 2026 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Planning Commission Regular Meeting

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record and a transcript or captions are published for this meeting.

People and votes

Commissioner thereof. Commissioner J.Johnson

1 statement

  1. Statement

    Commented on the color scheme.

    Official record

What people said

Attributed speechA separate authority lane. Speech is evidence of what a person said, never of what the board decided.
  • The official minutes identify speakers and topics, but summarize rather than quote their exact words.

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Aug 3, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • Some speaker identities remain unresolved.

The opening of 61,208 stored characters

COUNCIL: ALL RIGHT, SAYING IT'S 6 O'CLOCK, I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. CALL THE… SORRY, FEBRUARY 18TH, 2026, CITY OF LINCOLN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER GILBERT? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JACKSON? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? COUNCIL: AND CHAIR ERIC JOHNSON. HERE. COUNCIL: DO WE NEED TO MAKE IT KNOWN, COMMISSIONER MANNING. COUNCIL: WAS IT… ISN'T PRESENT, OR… I KNOW THAT AT THE LAST MEETING, HE DID MENTION ABOUT, BEING… COUNCIL: THERE'S KEY WEEK, WHERE SCHOOL BEING OUT, COUNCIL: I DID NOT GET OFFICIAL THROUGH EMAIL, BUT THERE WAS VERBAL FROM LAST MEETING. OKAY. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: ITEM NUMBER 3, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. WE'LL HAVE COMMISSIONER HERZOG WILL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE TONIGHT, PLEASE. COUNCIL: I LOVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. COUNCIL: PUBLIC FOR WHOM YOU STAND. COUNCIL: COGNITION. COUNCIL: GOODBYE. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: ITEM NUMBER 4, AGENDA MODIFICATIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY AGENDA MODIFICATIONS THIS EVENING? COUNCIL: I AM SEEING NONE. COUNCIL: SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO NUMBER 5, PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. COUNCIL: WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMITTEE, SORRY, THE COMMISSION. COUNCIL: CITIZENS MAY ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA WHEN THE ITEM IS CONSIDERED. CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK MAY REQUEST TO SPEAK BY RAISING YOUR HAND WHEN REQUESTED TO DO SO. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES. COUNCIL: SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT TO PUBLIC COMMENT. SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE, OR ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? COUNCIL: I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED IN THE ROOM, AND I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY CARDS. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: SO WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT, AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 6, INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM THE STAFF. COUNCIL: DOES THE STAFF HAVE ANY INFORMATIONAL ITEMS? COUNCIL: THANK YOU. WE DO JUST HAVE ONE INFORMATIONAL ITEM. SO, DURING THE UPLOAD OF THE AGENDA, WE ENCOUNTERED SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH OUR SOFTWARE, AND SO YOU MAY NOTICE, DEPENDING ON WHICH LINK YOU CLICK TO ACCESS THE AGENDA, THAT THERE IS A TYPO IN ONE LINK THAT WE WEREN'T ABLE TO CORRECT, BUT IT IS COUNCIL: CORRECT WITHIN THE AGENDA PACKET AND WITHIN THE PRESENT… THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE THIS EVENING. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 7, DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. SO THIS OPPORTUNITY, IF ANY OF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY COMMUNICATION TO DISCLOSE, WE'LL START TO MY RIGHT. COUNCIL: GOODMAIL. COUNCIL: A NONE FOR ME. NONE. COUNCIL: NONE? NONE. AND I ALSO HAVE NONE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: SO NOW WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 8, CONSENT. MR. CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO REQUEST THAT ITEMS 8 COUNCIL: B AND 8C. COUNCIL: BE REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION. COUNCIL: AND I WOULD, MOVE APPROVAL OF, THE REMAINING ITEM, 8A. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: PERFECT. SO WE HAVE, 8B AND 8C REMOVED WITH A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REMAINING. I'LL SECOND. OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. COUNCIL: WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO A VOICE CALL? YES, VOICE CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL: ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. COUNCIL: ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL: AND ABSTENTIONS? COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: EXCELLENT, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: SO, ITEM NUMBER 8B HAS BEEN REMOVED. COUNCIL: LET'S SEE… SO… WE'LL GO AHEAD AND… DISCUSS ITEM AB. COUNCIL: WHICH IS… THE GROVE, PRODUCTION HOMES DESIGN REVIEW, AND THAT'S WITHIN THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN. COUNCIL: AREA. COUNCIL: SO, I GUESS I'LL GO AHEAD AND… COUNCIL: TURN IT OVER TO THE STAFF. COUNCIL: MR. CHAIR, IF I COULD, I WOULD, COUNCIL: I BROUGHT THIS UP, REALLY NOT, GERMANE TO THE… COUNCIL: THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE'S, RECOMMENDATION ON THE HOUSING, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS VERY INSTRUCTIVE, TO SEE TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO COUNCIL: CIRCULATION ELEMENT FOR, BEFORE THE TWO… COUNCIL: THESE TWO HOUSING, DEVELOPMENTS ON THEIR PEDESTRIAN AND, BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLANS. COUNCIL: AND IF I COULD, IF I COULD HAVE TOM SHOW ATTACHMENT 7 OF 8B. COUNCIL: I WILL ATTEMPT TO… I'VE GOT, COUNCIL: ATTACHMENT 7 UP ON THE SCREEN HERE, IF EVERYONE CAN SEE THAT. COUNCIL: THIS SHOWS THE, THE TRAIL AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATTERN. COUNCIL: AND… IT, I FIND IT… BARELY, VERY POORLY DONE. COUNCIL: BECAUSE IT… IT DOESN'T REALLY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF COUNCIL: THE NATURAL, PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE SITE. COUNCIL: AND… IT'S… COUNCIL: PROBABLY SERVES ITS PURPOSE IF YOU WANT TO WALK A DOG, FOR 100 FEET OR SO. BUT IF YOU'RE TRYING TO GET ON THAT TRAIL SYSTEM AND GO SOMEWHERE IN PARTICULAR. COUNCIL: IT'S DIFFICULT, AND YOU REALLY HAVE TO RESORT TO USING, STREET, STREETS TO, TO… COUNCIL: GET WHERE YOU WANT TO GO. COUNCIL: FOR EXAMPLE, FROM… FROM THAT, FROM THAT. COUNCIL: CIRCULATION PATTERN. YOU REALLY CAN'T… COUNCIL: GET TO THINGS LIKE THE COMMERCIAL CENTER, OR FUTURE COMMERCIAL CENTER, ANYWAY. SOME MAJOR PARKS ARE NOT TIED TOGETHER WITH IT. YOU CAN'T EASILY GET TO THE AUBURN TRAIL, WHICH I WOULD HOPE SOMEDAY WOULD EXTEND INTO, INTO AUBURN. COUNCIL: AND THEN… IF YOU WOULD BRING UP, ATTACHMENT, 11 OF ITEM 8C, THIS IS… COUNCIL: JUST REMARKABLY, REMARKABLY HOW WELL DONE. IT'S… COUNCIL: USING ALL OF THE PHYSICAL FEATURES, TO MAKE CONNECTIONS, AND YOU CAN GET TO, PARKS, SCHOOL SITES, COUNCIL: AND OTHER TRAILS. COUNCIL: EFFORTLESSLY. COUNCIL: AND KIND OF MY POINT IS, IF WE CAN… IF WE CAN DO IT RIGHT IN THIS INSTANCE, WHY CAN'T WE DO IT RIGHT FOR ALL INSTANCES? COUNCIL: AND, COUNCIL: YOU KNOW, MAYBE WE CAN BLAME IT ON THE GENERAL PLAN BEING NOT AS DIRECTIVE AS IT PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN. COUNCIL: BUT… I WOULD LIKE TO SEE US GET A LITTLE BIT COUNCIL: TOUGHER ON THE, ON THE DEVELOPERS, AND TRY TO GET COUNCIL: CIRCULATION ELEMENTS THAT LOOKS LIKE THIS, RATHER THAN THE FIRST ONE THAT WE SAW. COUNCIL: AND THAT WAS REALLY MY ONLY POINT OF THIS WHOLE EVENT, AND… COUNCIL: IF THERE AREN'T ANY FURTHER DISCUSSIONS, I WOULD MOVE APPROVAL OF… BOTH ITEMS. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM ANY COMMISSIONERS? COUNCIL: OKAY, WELL, I DON'T SEE ANY. THANK YOU SO… COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. COUNCIL: TO MOVE APPROVAL OF, COUNCIL: PERFECT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, COUNCIL: FOR ITEM 8B, THE GROVE PRODUCTION HOME DESIGN REVIEW WITHIN THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. COUNCIL: WHO MOTIONED? SORRY, I MISSED IT. COUNCIL: I DID. COMMISSIONER BARRY JOHNSON. JERRY, THANK YOU, AND PETER, SECOND. SINCE THIS WAS PULLED FROM CONSENT, I WOULD LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. PLEASE. THANK YOU. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? YES. COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES. COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COUNCIL: AND CHAIR ERIC JOHNSON. YES. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, MOTION PASSES. COUNCIL: WE'LL GO ON TO ITEM C. PLEASE, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON. COUNCIL: DO YOU HAVE SOME, COMMENTS? COUNCIL: REGARDING ITEM C, THAT'S THE LIBERTY AT LINCOLN VILLAGE 1, AND LIBERTY AT LINCOLN VILLAGE 2 PRODUCTION HOME DESIGN REVIEW WITHIN THE VILLAGE 7 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. I'M SORRY, I MEANT THAT MOTION TO BE APPROVAL OF BOTH. OH, OKAY. BNC. DID HE SAY THAT? OKAY, I MISSED IT. COUNCIL: I WOULD LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE, THEN A MOTION BY JERRY… COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON, A SECOND BY PETER GILBERT FOR THIS ITEM. WONDERFUL, I WILL DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. AND THIS IS FOR BOTH RESOLUTIONS IN LIBERTY OF LINCOLN FOR VILLAGE 1 AND VILLAGE 2 DESIGN REVIEW. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON. HI. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER HERZOG? I JUST NEED A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, BECAUSE SINCE WE POLLED IT, DO WE NEED TO OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THESE, OR DO WE NOT? COUNCIL: NOT NECESSARY, UP TO CHAIRMAN, ERIC JOHNSON. THIS IS… THIS IS CHRISTINE, THE CITY ATTORNEY. I'M SORRY I'M REMOTE TONIGHT. BUT YES, IT IS UP TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR, BECAUSE IT IS A CONSENT ITEM, BUT… IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T HURT TO OPEN IT UP TO PUBLIC COMMENT. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: FOLLOWING THAT, I WILL OPEN IT TO PUBLIC COMMENT. COUNCIL: DO WE HAVE ANY… SECRETARY, HAVE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE OR IN THE AUDIENCE, PLEASE? COUNCIL: THERE ARE NO HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: THERE ARE NO HANDS RAISED IN THE ROOM. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. SO, WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND BRING IT BACK. SO, WE HAVE A MOTION. COUNCIL: AND A SECOND, AND THAT IS FOR BOTH ITEMS 8B AND 8C. I WOULD… I WOULD ASK THAT YOU… VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY, PLEASE. COUNCIL: OKAY, SO, WE WERE TAKING A VOTE ON 8C FOR LIBBY OF LINCOLN VILLAGE 1 DESIGN REVIEW. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON? YES. COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES. COMMISSIONER HUTCHISON? YES. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. AND CHAIRMAN ERIC JOHNSON? YES. THANK YOU. POINT OF WATER, WE ALREADY VOTED ON 8B. COUNCIL: WE… WE DID, CORRECT. SO THAT… THAT IS DONE. WE'VE DONE THEM SEPARATELY, AS THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS SUGGESTED. COUNCIL: I THINK, CHRISTINE WAS SPEAKING ABOUT VILLAGE, LIBERTY OF LINCOLN 8C. WE HAVE TWO RESOLUTIONS. ONE IS FOR VILLAGE 1, AND ONE IS FOR VILLAGE 2. COUNCIL: SPLIT THOSE. OKAY. COUNCIL: YES. COUNCIL: ARE YOU OKAY? CORRECT. COUNCIL: YES. COUNCIL: ARE YOU OKAY, COMMISSIONER GILBERT, WITH YOUR VOTE ON VILLAGE 1? COUNCIL: WONDERFUL. CHAIRMAN, JOHNSON, CAN WE GET A MOTION FOR… I'LL MOTION FOR THE SECOND PART OF 8C WITH APPROVAL OF VILLAGE 2. I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. I HAVE A MOTION, A SECOND. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES. COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? YES. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? YES. AND CHAIRMAN ERIC JOHNSON? YES. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, MOTION PASSES. COUNCIL: I THINK WE'RE COVERED. COUNCIL: ON THAT ONE. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: SHOULD WE VOTE ON THEM AGAIN, JUST FOR FUN? WELL DONE, TEAM. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, CHRISTINE. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: SO, WITH, CONSENT ITEMS, COUNCIL: COMPLETED, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 9, PUBLIC HEARINGS. COUNCIL: AND WE WILL HAVE ITEM 9A. THIS IS THE WALMART REMODEL DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION, AND WE'LL HAVE MICHAELA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER, WITH THE STAFF THAT WILL GIVE US A REPORT TONIGHT. PLEASE, MICHAELA. COUNCIL: HERE WE GO. OKAY, PERFECT. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. MICHAELA NOBLE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. NICE SEEING YOU ALL. IT'S BEEN A FEW MONTHS SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE, SO NICE TO SEE YOU ALL. COUNCIL: THE PROJECT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS THE WALMART REMODEL PROJECT. THE PRESENTATION IS A SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT, AND MORE DETAILED INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL: JUST WANT TO ADDRESS THE MEMORANDUM THAT IS PROVIDED ON YOUR DESK. THIS WAS SENT OUT TO YOU ALL DIGITALLY ON FRIDAY. COUNCIL: THERE WERE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH OUR AGENDA DISTRIBUTION SOFTWARE, WHICH NITA MENTIONED EARLIER, THAT HAD AFFECTED THIS PROJECT, SO THE MEMO JUST KIND OF CLEARED UP THOSE TECHNICAL ERRORS THAT WE COULDN'T ADDRESS ONLINE. IT'S THE FULL AGENDA PACKET, FULLY CORRECTED. COUNCIL: SOME OF THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED ONLINE, BUT JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE THE MEMO SINCE IT WAS EMAILED TO YOU ALL ON FRIDAY. COUNCIL: THE APPLICANT, POOLEY, IS REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION FOR THE EXISTING WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET. COUNCIL: THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 255 LINCOLN BOULEVARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LINCOLN BOULEVARD AND 3RD STREET. COUNCIL: THE PROJECT SITE IS BOUND BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST. THE SOMERSET SENIOR LIVING FACILITY IS LOCATED EAST OF THE PROJECT SITE. COUNCIL: THE PROPERTY IS OWNED COMMERCIAL AND IS SUBJECT TO THE LINCOLN MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE LINCOLN DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN PLAN. COUNCIL: AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET IS AN EXISTING BUILDING AND BUSINESS. THE PROJECT IS NOT PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, AND ONLY INTENDS TO MODIFY THE EXTERIOR PAINT COLOR SCHEME, UPDATE EXISTING SIGNAGE, AND RE-STRIPE THE PARKING LOT. COUNCIL: THE SITE PLAN ILLUSTRATES UPDATES TO ADA, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT. COUNCIL: PARKING STALL STRIPING TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT BUILDING CODES. ADDITIONALLY, 14 PARKING STALLS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARK PROJECT SITE ARE PROPOSED TO BE DESIGNATED AS PICKUP STALLS. COUNCIL: SO THE PARKING STALLS FOR PICKUP ARE LOCATED IN THIS AREA. COUNCIL: THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO UPDATE THE CURRENT WARM, EARTHY PAINT SCHEME OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND UTILIZE SHADES OF GRAY, BLACK, WHITE, AND BLUE TO CORRESPOND WITH WALMART'S UPDATED BRANDING. WALL SIGNS WOULD BE REPLACED AND UPDATED. COUNCIL: NO MODIFICATIONS TO THE FREESTANDING SIGN STRUCTURE ARE BEING PROPOSED, HOWEVER, THE SIGN FACE IS BEING UPDATED TO REFLECT COUNCIL: WALMART'S NEW BRANDING STYLE. COUNCIL: WHICH, JUST TO REITERATE, THIS IS THE AREA THAT'S CHANGING, JUST KIND OF THE SIGN, FACE, AND COPY. THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE ITSELF IS NOT BEING MODIFIED. COUNCIL: STAFF ANALYZED THE PROPOSED ENTITLEMENT REQUEST AND CONCLUDED THAT IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, POLICY, AND INTENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN, LINCOLN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLES 16 AND 18, AND THE LINCOLN DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN PLAN. COUNCIL: THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REVIEWED THE PROJECT IN JANUARY AND DID NOT PROVIDE ANY MODIFICATION REQUESTS FOR THE PROJECT. COUNCIL: THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. COUNCIL: CITY STAFF HAS PREPARED DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO ENSURE ORDERLY AND TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT. COUNCIL: STANDARD AND PROJECT-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN APPLIED. THESE WILL ALL BE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY CITY DEPARTMENTS, AND THE APPLICANT HAS REVIEWED AND AGREED TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. COUNCIL: STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINE THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, UNDER SECTION 15301, EXISTING FACILITIES, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION FOR THE WALMART REMODEL PROJECT. COUNCIL: AT THIS TIME, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY FORMAL PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, AND ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE APPLICANT TEAM ONLINE ON ZOOM WHO ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, MICHAELA. COUNCIL: BEFORE I OPEN IT TO PUBLIC HEARINGS, I'LL ASK MY COLLEAGUES IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BEFORE WE OPEN IT. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, PLEASE. COUNCIL: MAY FALL UNDER THE WHITE HOUSE. COUNCIL: WISE-ASS COMMENT, BUT… COUNCIL: BLUE, BLACK, GRAY, AND WHITE ARE THE FOUR… THE ONLY FOUR COLORS ONE SEES IN ANTARCTICA OR THE ARCTIC. COUNCIL: AND WHILE I DON'T… PINK. COUNCIL: THAT'S PARTICULARLY RELEVANT. I DON'T… I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS IS… COUNCIL: YOU KNOW, I TEND TO THINK THAT THE TANS ARE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR OUR LOCAL AREA, BUT… COUNCIL: I REALLY FIND IT KIND OF ATTRACTIVE, THE WAY IT'S BEEN PRESENTED, AND COUNCIL: FIGHTING A NATIONAL BRAND IS PROBABLY NOT, PRACTICAL. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: THAT'S A… THANKS FOR THE OBSERVATION. COUNCIL: YEAH, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOR OPENING UP TO PUBLIC HEARING? COUNCIL: ALL RIGHT, WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM MAY REQUEST TO SPEAK BY RAISING THEIR HAND. WHEN REQUESTED TO DO SO, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES. SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE, OR ANYONE IN THE CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? COUNCIL: I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: AND I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED HERE IN THE ROOM. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE… THIS PUBLIC HEARING FOR THAT ITEM. COUNCIL: AND… LET'S SEE, SO I'LL BRING IT BACK TO MY COLLEAGUES. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? COUNCIL: I'LL START. COUNCIL: ON THIS END, ANY… PLEASE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. FIRST OF ALL, HAVING SPENT… COUNCIL: A GOOD PART OF MY CAREER FOR A VERY MAJOR COUNCIL: AMERICAN CORPORATION, I WANT IT TO BE KNOWN THAT THEY SPEND… COUNCIL: VAST SUMS OF MONEY ON SIGNAGE. COUNCIL: WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, WHAT COLOR IT'S GOING TO BE, ETC. COUNCIL: IF YOU'RE A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION, AND YOU ADOPT COUNCIL: A COLOR SCHEME OR A SIGN PROGRAM. COUNCIL: IT'S CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO JUSTIFY YOUR INVESTMENT. COUNCIL: THAT YOU BE CONSISTENT ALL THE WAY THROUGH. THAT IS PROBABLY THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF ANY SIGNAGE PROGRAM, IS TO BE CONSISTENT, BECAUSE IT'S… THEY WANT PEOPLE TO RECOGNIZE IT. HOWEVER, I ASKED FOR THE FLOOR FOR ANOTHER REASON. COUNCIL: AND, I HAD ORIGINALLY BROUGHT TO THE STAFF'S ATTENTION THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE NUMBERS, AND WE FOUND OUT IT WAS WITH THE SOFTWARE, AND WE DO HAVE THE CORRECT NUMBERS. AND WITH MY BACKGROUND. COUNCIL: IN FINANCE, I ALWAYS MAKE SURE THAT THINGS ADD UP, AND THEY DIDN'T, BUT THEY DO NOW, SO THANK YOU, THANK YOU TO STAFF. COUNCIL: HOWEVER, I'M GOING TO SHARE WITH YOU ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, I'M HANDICAPPED. COUNCIL: AND I DO SHOP AT THIS WALMART. THEY CARRY A COUPLE PRODUCTS. COUNCIL: THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO TRAVEL COUNCIL: MAYBE 15, 20 MILES AWAY, SO THEY BECOME ONE OF MY PLACES. MY WIFE SHOPS IN 3 OR 4 DIFFERENT SUPERMARKETS. SHE'S FUSSY WHAT SHE BUYS, BUT THERE'S A COUPLE THINGS THAT I WANT TO BUY LOCALLY… COUNCIL: WALMART'S THE PLACE FOR ME. COUNCIL: QUITE OFTEN, WHEN I GO TO WALMART. COUNCIL: I CAN'T FIND A PARKING PLACE. COUNCIL: AND OF COURSE, BEING RETIRED, I DON'T GO THE SAME TIME EVERY TIME. I GO WHEN I WANT. SO I'VE TRIED TO FIND THE TIME DURING THE DAY COUNCIL: WHERE THERE'S PARKING PLACES AVAILABLE. COUNCIL: AND IT'S DIFFICULT, AND OF COURSE, THERE'S A LIMITED NUMBER OF HANDICAPPED PLACES, AND I ASSUME THAT THE NUMBER THEY HAVE MEETS OUR CRITERIA FOR THE CITY. COUNCIL: NOW, WHAT I SEE HERE IS… COUNCIL: I'VE BEEN HAVING A PROBLEM, AND NOT ONLY DO I ALSO WANT TO COMMENT, NOT ONLY DO I HAVE A PROBLEM PARKING IN THE PARKING LOT. COUNCIL: MOST OF THE TIME, I HAVE TROUBLE PARKING ON THE PERIMETER OF THE SHOPPING CENTER ON THE STREET. COUNCIL: I HAVE THAT PROBLEM. COUNCIL: OTHER PEOPLE HAVE THAT PROBLEM. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE HANDICAPPED TO HAVE THAT PROBLEM. COUNCIL: WHICH MEANS, FROM A MARKETING STANDPOINT, YOU'RE PROBABLY LOSING BUSINESS. COUNCIL: AND SO THEY HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM HERE, AND THEY HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM BECAUSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED HERE FOR A WHILE KNOW THIS WAS ANOTHER COUNCIL: KIND OF NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET. COUNCIL: IT CLOSED UP. COUNCIL: WALMART DECIDED TO COME IN. I WAS ON THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE TIME. IT WAS WONDERFUL TO CUT THE RIBBON AND COUNCIL: WELCOMED THEM TO THE COMMUNITY, AND THEY'VE BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL. COUNCIL: THEY PROBABLY GENERATED A LOT MORE SALES TAX REVENUE FOR US. COUNCIL: WHEN I LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, HOWEVER. COUNCIL: IT SAYS TO ME THAT FOR THE TYPICAL CUSTOMER, THE TYPICAL CUSTOMER THAT'S GOING TO GO INTO THE MARKET AND SHOP COUNCIL: AND SELECT THINGS, RATHER THAN COUNCIL: SHOPPING ELECTRONICALLY, WHICH I DO QUITE OFTEN MYSELF AND OTHER PLACES, THERE'S LESS PARKING PLACES. COUNCIL: AND SO WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR TONIGHT COUNCIL: IS TO MAKE IT MORE CONVENIENT FOR PEOPLE WHO PRE-ORDER AND WANT TO GO INTO THE PICKUP AREA. THEY'RE GOING TO EXTEND THAT. COUNCIL: BUT SOMETHING HAS TO MATCH UP ON THE NUMBERS, AND THEY'RE TAKING AWAY ADDITIONAL PARKING PLACES FOR THE PEOPLE COUNCIL: NEED OR WANT TO GO INTO THE STORE TO BUY. COUNCIL: AND THAT BOTHERS ME. I DON'T… I'VE TRIED VERY DILIGENTLY TO FIGURE OUT SOME SUGGESTION TO THAT. COUNCIL: AND IF IT COMES TO IT, I WILL VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS. COUNCIL: BUT… I THINK WE PROBABLY ARE JUST MAKING ONE PROBLEM, GO DOWN SOMEWHAT. COUNCIL: AND WE'RE CREATING MAYBE A BIGGER PROBLEM COUNCIL: FOR THE PEOPLE WHO SHOP IN THE STORE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING MY COMMENTS. COUNCIL: YES, THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS ON THAT. COUNCIL: I GUESS WE'LL… MAYBE WE'LL GET SOME COMMENTS, AND THEN WE'LL SEE IF THE APPLICANT HAS, ANY… ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO SAY. COUNCIL: IN RESPONSE, DO YOU HAVE ANY… HERZOG? YEAH, THANK YOU. I, I, COUNCIL: YOU KNOW, I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THIS PARKING LOT, IT'S VERY CHALLENGING. I STRUGGLE TO SEE HOW YOU CAN FIT MORE SPOTS. COUNCIL: THEY'RE GONNA HAVE THE SAME NUMBER OF SPOTS TOTAL. COUNCIL: I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I, TOO, THOUGHT OF THAT, PETER, THAT, THAT, COUNCIL: THAT THEY'RE REDUCING THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS THAT WANT TO GO IN. COUNCIL: I WONDER… I WAS… COUNCIL: HOPING TO HEAR MORE ABOUT MAYBE SOME RESEARCH OR DATA ON THE INCREASE IN PEOPLE THAT JUST WANT TO PICK UP. COUNCIL: FROM THE PARKING LOT. COUNCIL: AND… AND SO, MAYBE THERE IS SOME MORE DATA AROUND THAT. I THINK THAT COULD HELP COUNCIL: LET'S MAKE A DECISION TONIGHT. COUNCIL: BUT, BUT YEAH, THIS PARKING LOT IS CHALLENGING, TO GET IN AND OUT OF, TO WALK AROUND, THOSE ONE LANES. COUNCIL: I THINK THE ANGLED SLOTS, YOU FIT MORE CARS, AND THEY ARE ALREADY ANGLED. COUNCIL: SO… I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE SPOTS, IS KIND OF MY POINT, SO… COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, DO YOU MIND IF I CUT IN? SURE. SO, TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE PARKING, LIKE I MENTIONED, THE PROJECT IS NOT EXPANDING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, AND OUR CODE FOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS OR ADDING ADDITIONAL SPOTS IS ONLY APPLICABLE IF THEY'RE EXPANDING OR ADDING ON TO THE BUILDING. COUNCIL: SO, WE DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE MORE SPACES. THE PROJECT, THE RAINBOW MARKET IS WHAT IT WAS PREVIOUSLY CALLED BACK IN THE DAY. THERE HAS BEEN SOME EXPANSIONS, AND, YOU KNOW, THAT CHANGED THE PARKING REQUIREMENT, BUT COUNCIL: AS IT WAS APPROVED WITH THAT CURRENT SQUARE FOOTAGE, IT WAS ROUGHLY ABOUT 50 STALLS UNDER-PARKED, BUT IT WAS APPROVED THAT WAY WITH PREVIOUS ENTITLEMENTS. SO WE… WITH THE REQUEST TODAY, WE CAN'T BUMP THAT NUMBER UP OR ENFORCE OUR… COUNCIL: PARKING REQUIREMENTS. GRANTED, WE WOULDN'T EVEN BE ABLE TO GET ANYWHERE NEAR 50 MORE SPACES IN ORDER TO MEET THAT MINIMUM. ADDITIONALLY, THAT WAS ONE OF MY COMMENTS AS WELL, TOO, PETER, WAS I'VE… I DON'T LIVE IN LINCOLN, BUT I DRIVE PAST IT ALL THE TIME IN ORDER TO GET HERE, AND THAT PARKING LOT'S ALWAYS FULL. COUNCIL: AND THEY DO HAVE A TRAFFIC ENGINEER ONLINE, FROM KIMLEY HORNE, AND WHAT THEY PROVIDED WITH ME WAS, ESSENTIALLY, THE GOAL IS FOR MORE PEOPLE TO UTILIZE THE PICKUP STALLS TO WHERE THAT WOULD DECREASE THE NEED FOR THE ORDINARY CONSUMER TO COME IN. COUNCIL: I'M NOT A TRAFFIC ENGINEER MYSELF, SO I DO HAVE TO DEFER TO THE EXPERTS ON THAT, WHICH WOULD BE THE KIMLEY HORN REPRESENTATIVE. COUNCIL: AND ONCE YOU GUYS PROVIDE YOUR COMMENTS, WE CAN GET THEM ONLINE, TO PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL COLOR. COUNCIL: OKAY. THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY COMMENT AS WELL, IS THAT WE WOULD SEE THAT THERE WOULD BE COUNCIL: EXCUSE ME, MORE PEOPLE PICKING THINGS UP. I THINK THAT AS WE LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT STORES IN TODAY'S WORLD, WE'RE LOOKING AT ONLINE SHOPPING, WE'RE LOOKING AT PICKUP SHOPPING MORE AND MORE IN THE GROCERY STORE AREA. DO I LIKE IT? NO, I DRIVE A LARGE CAR, AND IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO PARK THERE AND NOT COUNCIL: PARK IN A SPOT WHERE I'M NOT GOING TO GET, DINGED OR WHATEVER. HOWEVER, I ALSO CAN APPRECIATE WHERE, YOU KNOW, WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM, AND I UNDERSTAND PETER'S CONCERN AS WELL, ESPECIALLY IN TODAY'S WORLD OF A REAL STRONG EMPHASIS ON ADA. COUNCIL: IT'S BECOMING MORE AND MORE OF A, OF A FACTOR FOR US TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT. SO, THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. I THINK WE'LL SEE MORE OF THE PICKUP. COUNCIL: AND MORE ONLINE, AND… OVER THE… OVER THE… COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: I'LL GO TO MY LEFT. ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OVER HERE? YEAH, I JUST WANTED A CLARIFICATION. HOW MANY PICKUP SPOTS ARE THERE RIGHT NOW? SIX. COUNCIL: AND WE'RE EXPANDING IT TO? 20. COUNCIL: SEEMS A LOT. COUNCIL: I MEAN, I THINK WE SHOULD TAKE BACK AND FIND OUT COUNCIL: HOW THEY CAME UP WITH 20, I THINK WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THAT. COUNCIL: BUT 6 TO 20, THAT SEEMS TO BE OBSESSIVE. COUNCIL: AND SO I THINK WE SHOULD, DEFINITELY CHALLENGE THAT. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL ITEMS? NO. OKAY. I AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS THAT I MADE. OKAY. COUNCIL: PLEASE. COUNCIL: ONE ADDITIONAL COMMENT I FORGOT TO MENTION. COUNCIL: SO, WHEN YOU, WHEN YOU'RE DESIGNING AND BUILDING A SHOPPING CENTER, YOU LOOK AT YOUR DEMOGRAPHICS AND YOU LOOK AT YOUR CUSTOMER BASE. COUNCIL: I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT NUMBER. COUNCIL: I KNOW THERE'S 11,000 PEOPLE OF OUR 52,000 THAT LIVE IN LINCOLN HILLS. COUNCIL: THAT ARE ALL SENIORS. COUNCIL: I ALSO KNOW THAT THERE'S ABOUT… COUNCIL: I'M GUESSING THE NUMBER NOW, BASED ON WHEN I WAS ON THE CITY COUNCIL, ABOUT 30% COUNCIL: OF THE REMAINDER OF LINCOLN ARE SENIORS. COUNCIL: THAT THERE PUTS THE SENIOR POPULATION AT A HIGH NUMBER. COUNCIL: THEY'RE NOT THE KIND OF PEOPLE. MY NEIGHBORS ARE NOT THE KIND OF PEOPLE. COUNCIL: THAT, BECAUSE THEY'RE WORKING, LIKE TO CALL THINGS IN, AND THEY'RE UNDER TIME CONSTRAINTS, WHATEVER. THEY'RE RETIRED. COUNCIL: THEY LIKE TO GO IN AND, AS THEY SAY, RATTLE THINGS AND CHECK THINGS. THEY HAVE THE TIME, AND SOME OF THEM ARE, THAT ARE SENIORS, ARE ON LIMITED INCOME, SO THEIR SHOPPING PATTERN IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. COUNCIL: THAN THE TYPICAL. NOW, WE'LL GROW OUT OF THAT AS THE REST OF OUR COMMUNITY IS DEVELOPED, AND THE SENIOR POPULATION BECOMES A SMALLER PERCENTAGE. COUNCIL: BUT WE'RE STILL GOING TO BE FACED WITH THE PROBLEM IN THIS PARKING LOT, BECAUSE AS OUR STAFF HAS SAID, UNLESS WE GO TO COUNCIL: JAPANESE PLAN, DOUBLE PARK, DOUBLE HIGH? COUNCIL: WE'RE NEVER GOING TO FIX THE PROBLEM, SO… COUNCIL: I, I THINK WE, YOUR, YOUR THOUGHT COUNCIL: IS EXACTLY WHAT I'M THINKING OF, IS THERE… IS THERE MAYBE A COMPROMISE THAT COULD BE DONE THAT WILL HELP THEM WITH THEIR MARKETING, WANTING TO GET MORE PEOPLE, ENCOURAGE MORE PEOPLE. COUNCIL: AND SEE HOW THAT WORKS. AND IF IT… IF IT WORKS FINE, GREAT, WE STOP AT 12 OR WHATEVER. IF IT… IF THEY SEE THE DEMAND IS THERE, THEY CAN COME BACK AGAIN. COUNCIL: SO… COUNCIL: THAT'S IT. I'M NOT GOING TO SAY ANY MORE. SURE. NO, THANK YOU FOR, ALL THE COMMENTS, ON HERE. SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S A LOT AROUND PARKING. I, TOO, SHOP THERE A LOT, AND SOMETIMES FIND IT CHALLENGING FOR PARKING, SO, I… I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND, KIND OF, THE LINE OF… COUNCIL: COMMENTS, FROM UP HERE. SO, IS THE APPLICANT, COUNCIL: ON THE… ON THE LINE THAT MIGHT BE WILLING TO… COUNCIL: I GUESS, SOUNDS LIKE WE'D BE INTERESTED IN HEARING A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE THOUGHT PROCESS ON… COUNCIL: HOW THEY CAME UP WITH THAT NUMBER FOR THE NUMBER OF PICKUP. COUNCIL: CHAIRMAN ERIC JOHNSON, THERE ARE… COUNCIL: REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE PROJECT ONLINE. IF YOU GUYS WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE UNMUTE YOUR MIC. COUNCIL: WE'RE ABOUT… 6 OF THEM THERE, AGAIN, THERE YOU GO. IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK, COUNCIL: IN RELATIONS TO RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS OF COMMISSIONERS, PLEASE DO SO. GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY? COUNCIL: YES. YES. HI, GOOD EVENING. I'M JEN GUTSLOFF. I AM WITH KIMBERLY HORNE. I AM WALMART'S CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ON THIS PROJECT. FIRST OFF, JUST WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR TAKING THE TIME TO CONSIDER THIS PROJECT TONIGHT. I CAN SPEAK A LITTLE BIT MORE REGARDING THE NUMBER OF PICKUP STALLS. WE DO RECOGNIZE THAT THIS PARKING LOT IS, UNDER-PARKED CURRENTLY, AND IS CROWDED, AND WE WERE… AWARE OF THAT IN OUR DESIGN, AND WE DID NOT, FURTHER REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS IN THE SITE. IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF PICKUP STALLS, THAT IS A STANDARD NUMBER THAT IS PROVIDED BY WALMART FOR THE TYPE OF STORE. SO SINCE THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET, 20 STALLS WERE REQUESTED. AND THAT'S A STANDARD THROUGHOUT… THE COUNTRY, BASED ON STORE TYPES, AND WHAT LEVEL OF PICKUP, USAGE THEY EXPECT AT THE STORES. INCREASING THEIR PICKUP OPERATIONS WILL ALLOW FOR MORE CUSTOMERS TO UTILIZE THAT SERVICE, AND HOPEFULLY FREE UP SOME OF THE OTHER PARKING SPOTS, JUST AS MORE AND MORE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO USE PICKUP, WALMART WANTS TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THAT SERVICE TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE. COUNCIL: PLEASE. COUNCIL: SO I DO… I'M GOING TO QUESTION THAT A LITTLE BIT. FIRST OF ALL, WITH REGARDS TO THIS IS THE STANDARD FOR THIS TYPE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET, THOSE OTHER MARKETS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, THEIR PARKING COUNCIL: FOOTPRINT. COUNCIL: DO THEY… ARE THEY SIMILAR TO THE PARKING FOOTPRINT THAT WE HAVE HERE? IT VARIES, SO THERE IS A… SORRY, THERE IS A RANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PICKUP STALLS THAT ARE REQUESTED. SO THIS RANGE, IS DEPENDENT ON THE SIZE OF THE MARKET, THE SIZE OF THE PARKING LOT, AND THEN IT'S DECIDED FROM THERE. COUNCIL: BUT BASED ON A RANGE, THAT MEANS WE COULD ACTUALLY ADJUST THIS DOWN IF WE FELT THAT WE NEEDED TO, BASED ON THE FOOTPRINT OF OUR PARKING LOT, CORRECT? IF THAT'S HOW YOU FEEL, WALMART HAS IDENTIFIED THIS… THESE 20 SPACES AS WHAT THEY WOULD PREFER TO, ACCOMMODATE THEIR FUTURE PICKUP OPERATIONS. COUNCIL: AND THAT WOULD BE BASED ON A LOT OF CLICK-THROUGHS WITH WALMART.COM AND OTHER THINGS THAT A LOT OF OUR RETIREES MAY NOT BE USING. COUNCIL: SO, I REALLY DO THINK THAT WE SHOULD TAKE THIS BACK TO WALMART AND SEE ABOUT ACTUALLY LOWERING IT, BECAUSE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ACTUALLY 3 PLUS TIMES THE AMOUNT THAT YOU HAVE TODAY. COUNCIL: I MEAN, DOUBLE AT 12, I THINK WE PROBABLY WOULDN'T BE… COUNCIL: SO ADAMANT ABOUT BEING AGAINST THIS. BUT, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE… YOU'RE TAKING, YOU KNOW, GOING FROM 6 TO 20… COUNCIL: WITH A SMALL FOOTPRINT. COUNCIL: I WOULD FEEL A LOT BETTER IF WE WERE ABLE TO GET IT MORE TO MAYBE 10 TO 12. COUNCIL: I SEE COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, PLEASE. COUNCIL: I WOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW IF THE PERCENTAGE OF PICKUP SPACES IS CLOSER TO… COUNCIL: THE 4% THAT WE HAVE NOW, OR IS IT CLOSER TO THE 16% THAT IS BEING PROPOSED NATIONWIDE? COUNCIL: WHAT IS YOUR NATIONWIDE PERCENTAGE OF COUNCIL: PICKUP SPACES. IS IT CLOSER TO 16%, OR CLOSER TO 4%? I DO NOT KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION. COUNCIL: THAT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO KNOW. COUNCIL: IF I MIGHT INTERJECT, THERE'S SUCH A VARIANCE. YOU KNOW, I PROBABLY WAS INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN. COUNCIL: WELL, ACTUALLY THE APPROVAL, BUT I NEEDED TO LOOK AT THE DESIGN WITH MY STAFF. COUNCIL: OF SHOPPING CENTERS THAT WERE BEING REDESIGNED. COUNCIL: NEW OUT OF THE GROUND, ETC. COUNCIL: AND, EVERYWHERE YOU GO, THE REQUIREMENTS ARE DIFFERENT. COUNCIL: BASED ON THE DEMOGRAPHICS IN THE AREA. COUNCIL: IN THE EAST, WHERE PEOPLE DON'T OWN CARS AT THE PERCENTAGES THAT PEOPLE IN THE WEST OWN CARS, YOU HAVE AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT, WAY OF LOOKING AT THINGS. SO I THINK, JERRY, IT WAS A GOOD QUESTION, BUT I DON'T THINK THE ANSWER TO THAT COUNCIL: REALLY AFFECTS THIS PARKING LOT. WE GOTTA DEAL WITH COUNCIL: WHAT WE HAVE HERE IN LINCOLN. COUNCIL: IN TERMS OF AGE AND COUNCIL: DEMOGRAPHICS, AND YOU KNOW, I THINK THE IDEA THAT ONE COMMISSIONER, INDICATED WHERE, YOU KNOW, AND I THINK WE COULD DO THAT TONIGHT… COUNCIL: I THINK IT'S PERFECTLY OKAY. I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE, CITY ATTORNEY, BUT IF WE WANTED TO SAY. COUNCIL: WE'LL GO TO 12. I'M JUST PICKING A NUMBER, BUT WHATEVER. WE'LL GO TO 12, CONVERT TO 12, LET'S SEE HOW THAT WORKS, AND THEN… COUNCIL: SOMETIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE, YOU CAN COME BACK IN, AND WE CAN LOOK AT COUNCIL: CAN WE GO FROM 12 TO SOME OTHER NUMBER? COUNCIL: SO THAT WE CAN GIVE THEM SOME RELIEF NOW. COUNCIL: BECAUSE PART OF THEIR MARKETING PLAN IS TO GET PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, TO BUY ELECTRONICALLY, BECAUSE THAT SAVES THEM A LOT OF MONEY, A LOT OF EFFORT. COUNCIL: THERE'S A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER REASONS, PARTICULARLY WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT'S GONNA MAKE… IT'S GONNA MAKE YOU MUCH MORE PROFITABLE AS WE GET COUNCIL: GET ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REALLY DRIVING OUR INVENTORY AND ALL THE OTHER ELEMENTS, OUR STAFFING, THE WHOLE, THE WHOLE WALL OF WAX. SO… COUNCIL: THAT WOULD BE MY SUGGESTION, IS THAT WE APPROVE IT, BUT COUNCIL: WITH SOME KIND OF A NUMBER IN THE MIDDLE. YEAH, I WOULD JUST SAY THAT THE CHANGE TO THE PARKING LOT TO MAKE THEM PICKUP SPOTS AS OPPOSED TO REGULAR PARKING SPOTS IS REALLY A MATTER OF STRIPING AND SIGNING. EXACTLY. COUNCIL: SPECIFIC TO WALMART, AND SO IF THIS COMMISSION FEELS THAT THAT NUMBER NEEDS TO BE A DIFFERENT NUMBER THAN THE 20 THAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT, YOU HAVE THAT AUTHORITY TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION AND STILL APPROVE IT WITH A CHANGE TO THE NUMBER OF SIGNED SPOTS. COUNCIL: I ALWAYS GO TO THE ATTORNEY BECAUSE I WANT TO BE COVERED LEGALLY. DON'T WORRY, SHE'LL CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. I'VE BEEN QUIET BECAUSE SHE'S AWESOME. COUNCIL: I AGREE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG, PLEASE. YEAH, THANK YOU. I WAS HOPING TO HEAR MORE LOCAL DATA ABOUT AN INCREASE IN THE NEED AT THIS PARTICULAR STORE, IN RELATION TO THE NEED FOR PICKUP SPOTS. LIKE, THEY'VE SEEN, YOU KNOW. COUNCIL: 20%, 30%, 150% INCREASE IN THIS NEED, BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE… WE'RE… COUNCIL: I UNDERSTAND THE THEORY BEHIND PICKUP SPOTS, BECAUSE THEORETICALLY, YOU WOULD HAVE MORE CARS MOVING IN AND OUT QUICKER. YOU'D BE ABLE TO HOUSE COUNCIL: MORE CUSTOMERS. COUNCIL: BUT THE PROBLEM THAT WE'RE GONNA CREATE COUNCIL: IS, IF YOU'RE PICKING UP, YOU CAN USE ANY SPOT. COUNCIL: IF YOU'RE NOT, YOU CAN'T USE ANY SPOT. COUNCIL: AND SO, WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO IS WE'RE GONNA CREATE MORE OF A TRAFFIC JAM. COUNCIL: IF WE DON'T HAVE THE DATA, THE PICKUP SPOTS ARE NEEDED. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO CAUSE MORE OF A PROBLEM TO PEOPLE THAT WANT TO GO INTO THE STORE. COUNCIL: SO THAT'S WHY I'M VERY HESITANT TO APPROVE COUNCIL: 20 SPOTS WITHOUT LOCAL DATA OF INCREASE AND THE NEED FOR IT. PARTICULARLY AROUND THE, YOU KNOW, PERCENTAGE OF SO MANY TIMES OVER, THAT WE ALREADY HAVE IN THIS VERY LIMITED SPACE. COUNCIL: SO I DON'T WANT TO CREATE MORE OF A PROBLEM FOR PEOPLE THAT WANT TO GO TO THE STORE, AND I THINK WE WILL DO THAT WITH 20 PICKUP SPOTS, BECAUSE THEY WON'T ALL BE USED. COUNCIL: SO I'M… I'M ALSO LEANING TO A MUCH SMALLER NUMBER, AT THIS POINT. COUNCIL: I'M JUST GONNA SAY, I THINK 10 IS A GOOD… IS A GOOD COMPROMISE TO TRY AND TO TRACK. COUNCIL: BECAUSE I AGREE, HOW OFTEN ARE THESE 6 UTILIZED? ALL THE TIME? ARE THEY? WOULD THE 10 BE UTILIZED ALL THE TIME OR NOT? AND SO IF YOU TRACK FOR A FEW MONTHS, AND THEN YOU CAN MAKE OTHER DETERMINATIONS. COUNCIL: SHOULD BE PRETTY EASY TO TRACK, TOO. I THINK SO. JUST PUT SOME CAMERAS OUT THERE, YOU CAN SEE WHEN THEY PARK AND WHEN THEY DON'T PARK. EXACTLY. MORE THAN LIKELY, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE IT PROBABLY MORE AFTER 5 WHEN PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY COMING HOME AND THEY'RE TRYING TO GRAB SOMETHING. YEAH, AND IF YOU'RE PICKING UP, YOU CAN STILL USE ANY SPOT. YEAH, EXACTLY. COUNCIL: SO I THINK 10, I AGREE, IS A GOOD COMPROMISE. COUNCIL: I DO WANT TO ADD SOMETHING, MAYBE AS AN OFFER OF COMPROMISE, AND MAYBE A CONDITION THAT SAYS. COUNCIL: MAXIMUM OF 20, OR EQUIVALENT TO 20 SPACES, BUT INITIALLY 10. COUNCIL: AND THEN, AT THAT POINT, YOU BRING BACK, OR GET SOME KIND OF DOCUMENTATION FROM THE APPLICANT. COUNCIL: JUSTIFYING THE INCREASE TO WHATEVER AMOUNT. COUNCIL: WE HAVE A SITE PLAN THAT IDENTIFIES THE AREAS FOR PICKUP, PERHAPS. COUNCIL: THE 20 THAT THEY HAVE IDENTIFIED COULD BE… OR THE 10. COUNCIL: IF WE'RE CHOOSING 10 AT THE MOMENT, THE 10 COULD BE, LIKE, STRIPE FOR NO PARKING OR WHATEVER. COUNCIL: BUT THEN THE 10 THAT WE'RE GOING UP TO FROM 6 COULD BE THE ONES THAT YOU AGREED UPON. COUNCIL: TO BE CONDITIONED FOR THIS PROJECT TO MOVE FORWARD. YEAH, I THINK, TRUTHFULLY, I THINK WE DON'T WANT TO GIVE THEM THAT ON-RAMP. COUNCIL: I WOULD RATHER ACTUALLY HAVE AN OFF-RAMP. COUNCIL: WHERE THEY HAVE TO COME BACK TO US TO SAY, THIS IS THE DATA, AND THIS IS WHY WE WANT TO GO TO SOMETHING MORE. COUNCIL: SO I WOULD RATHER JUST GO AHEAD AND PUT A NUMBER DOWN NOW, THIS IS WHAT WE APPROVE, AND THEN IF YOU SEE LATER, BASED ON YOUR DATA, THAT YOU WANT TO INCREASE IT, COME BACK TO US, AND WE WILL THEN REVIEW THE DATA. COUNCIL: PLEASE COUNCIL: FAILS. COUNCIL: YES, AND I HAD ONE QUESTION REAL QUICK BEFORE THAT, TOO, IF THAT'S OKAY. SO I'M JUST CURIOUS, TALKING ABOUT CURRENT UTILIZATION, FORGIVE ME IF I MISSED IT, WAS THERE, DATA… THEY HAVE 6 NOW, ARE THEY FINDING THAT THOSE ARE… COUNCIL: BEING FULLY UTILIZED. COUNCIL: IS THAT KIND OF PUSHING THIS? COUNCIL: I'LL DEFER THAT TO THE APPLICANT. I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION. FROM CITY'S PERSPECTIVE, WE DON'T HAVE ANY CODE REQUIREMENTS LETTING US DICTATE HOW MANY PARKING OR PICKUP STALLS. COUNCIL: THERE'S ALLOWED TO BE… IT'S NOT IN OUR CODE, SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY… STAFF DOESN'T HAVE ANY REGULATION OF THAT, SO I'LL DEFER TO THE APPLICANT OF WHETHER, YOU KNOW, THERE'S DATA ON UTILIZATION OF THOSE CURRENT 6 STALLS. COUNCIL: APPLICANT, IF YOU'RE SPEAKING, PLEASE UNMUTE. UNFORTUNATELY, I DON'T HAVE ANY SPECIFIC DATA, BUT I KNOW WALMART DOES CHOOSE TO DO THE INCREASES AT THESE STORES WHEN THEY DO FEEL LIKE THE DEMAND IS THERE. COUNCIL: OKAY. BUT IT IS… BUT IT IS PRETTY MUCH KIND OF THEIR RULE OF THUMB TO USE COUNCIL: THAT 20, CORRECT? CORRECT. COUNCIL: ESSENTIALLY, IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S A FORMULA BASED ON STORE SIZE, PARKING LOT SIZE, TO KIND OF CHURN OUT THAT 20 FIGURE IN THIS CASE. COUNCIL: DEMOGRAPHICS IS NOT BEING TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. COUNCIL: YEAH, AND I WAS KIND OF HOPING TO KNOW IF, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS SOMEONE ELSE'S, LIKE, THEY FOUND THOSE 6 ARE ABSOLUTELY USED ALL THE TIME. COUNCIL: JUST TO KIND OF GET A FEEL FOR WHAT AN IDEAL NUMBER WOULD BE. PLEASE. COUNCIL: AS I SAID EARLIER, I SHOP AT ALL DIFFERENT HOURS, AND THERE ARE TIMES WHEN I GO IN WHERE THEY ARE NOT FULLY UTILIZED. COUNCIL: THAT'S NOT THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME, THAT'S THE MINORITY OF THE TIME, BUT THERE ARE TIMES WHEN I GO IN AND THERE ARE LOTS OF SPACES IN THE PARKING LOT. BUT, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, I'M RETIRED, I CAN GO SHOP ANYTIME THAT THEY'RE OPEN. COUNCIL: AND I'M NOT THE TYPICAL PERSON THAT GOES SHOPPING THERE. BUT AGAIN, IF… COUNCIL: IF IT'S ACCEPTABLE TO THE CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CAN VOTE ON. COUNCIL: SURE, YEAH, I'M IN FAVOR OF MOVING FORWARD, AND I'LL MAKE ONE ADDITIONAL COMMENT. IF WE DO, I GUESS, REDUCE THE SIZE NUMBER, I'M HEARING, TOO, THERE'S SOME THINGS TO CONSIDER, POSSIBLY, ON THEIR PART WHEN THEY'RE PICKING COUNCIL: WHICH PICKUP STALLS TO USE, IF THEY CAN LEAVE SOME OF THE STALLS, NORMAL STALLS, THAT MIGHT BE A LITTLE MORE ACCESSIBLE OR FRIENDLY TO, YOU KNOW, NOT NECESSARILY DESIGNATED ADA, COUNCIL: BUT IF THERE'S A WAY TO STRATEGICALLY PLACE THOSE PICKUP ITEMS, OR PICKUP STALLS. COUNCIL: TO LEAVE THE REMAINING ONES A LITTLE BIT MORE FAVORABLE FOR, THAT, POPULATION. COUNCIL: I'LL, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE, ACCEPT THE STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL: CHANGING IT FROM 20 TO 12. COUNCIL: DESIGNATED AS, PICKUP SPOTS. COUNCIL: I'LL SECOND. COUNCIL: OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. COUNCIL: TO AMEND, THE STAFF REPORT AND THE PROPOSAL FROM 20 TO 12. COUNCIL: SO I HAVE A MOTION, A SECOND. COUNCIL: I GUESS, PROCEDURALLY, ANY… ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE A ROLL CALL ON THAT MOTION? COUNCIL: I CAN TAKE A ROLL CALL VOTE. SO, MY ONLY CONCERN IS THAT YOU HAVE AMENDED AND I THINK WE PROBABLY NEED TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. COUNCIL: YES. OKAY. COUNCIL: FAIR ENOUGH. SO, WE HAVE THAT CURRENT MOTION ON THE TABLE TO AMEND FROM 20… COUNCIL: TO 12, SO I'LL OPEN… REOPEN FOR A PUBLIC COMMENT. COUNCIL: WE HAVE ANY… SECRETARY, PLEASE, ANYONE… HANDS RAISED ONLINE, OR ANYONE IN THE… IN THE CHAMBERS? COUNCIL: I DON'T SEE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: AND I DON'T SEE ANY HANDS WHERE HE'S IN THE ROOM. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: WOULD… WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING? COUNCIL: DURING THIS… THIS TIME? COUNCIL: IF ANY APPLICANT IS SPEAKING, PLEASE UNMUTE YOUR MIC. THIS IS THE TIME DURING PUBLIC HEARING IF THE APPLICANT HAS ANY PROTEST OR COMMENT IN ORDER TO CREATE THE RECORD. IT WOULD BE THE TIME TO MAKE COMMENT. COUNCIL: IF YOU'RE MAKING A COMMENT, PLEASE UNMUTE YOUR MIC. COUNCIL: THERE IS NO UNMUTED MIC, SO… OKAY. COUNCIL: JUST TO BE… POINT OF CLARIFICATION ON THE MOTION, WE'RE… WE'RE VOTING THAT WE'RE APPROVING THE COLOR AND THE SIGN, BUT THEN THE ONLY CHANGE IS… COUNCIL: FOR THE PARKING. COUNCIL: ARE WE GONNA VOTE ON ALL OF THAT TOGETHER? COUNCIL: YES. OKAY. YEP. YES, IT IS… IT IS AN AMENDED… WE CAN DO IT ONE OF TWO WAYS. THE EASIEST IS JUST TO SAY, IT'S AMENDED. WITH THE PARKING CHANGE, AND THEN DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. COUNCIL: MY REQUEST WOULD BE TO VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY. COUNCIL: THE AMENDED AND THE OTHER CONTINUING ITEMS. AND THAT… AND THAT'S FINE. COUNCIL: JUST A SMALL POINT OF CLARIFICATION. SO THE MOTION IS TO AMEND THE STAFF REPORT. THE MOTION WAS NOT TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. COUNCIL: SO, IF THIS BODY WISHES TO MAKE A ROLL CALL VOTE ON AMENDING THE STAFF REPORT, THEY WOULD STILL NEED TO MAKE A MOTION TO PASS THE RESOLUTION WITH THE AMENDED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. COUNCIL: THAT'S VERY… YOU COULD VOTE TWICE. OKAY. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: AND I'LL OFFICIALLY CLOSE THAT PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WE HAD AGAIN. COUNCIL: SO, I'LL BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION. SO, IF I UNDERSTAND CLEARLY, SO WE HAVE… COUNCIL: TWO… TWO VOTES. COUNCIL: CORRECT. SO THE ONE… IS… HOW IT'S WRITTEN, COUNCIL: YOU'RE JUST… YOU'RE ESSENTIALLY GAINING CONSENSUS OF YOUR COMMISSION THAT THEIR AGREEMENT TO ADJUST THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN THE STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: THAT'S THE MOTION THAT'S ON THE FLOOR. OKAY. COUNCIL: SO WE WILL GO WITH THE MOTION THAT'S CURRENTLY ON THE FLOOR TO AMEND FROM 20 PICKUP STALLS COUNCIL: TO 12. COUNCIL: 10, WASN'T IT? THIS WAS… THIS WAS 12. OKAY, SORRY. YEP, SO THIS MOTION'S FOR 12. COUNCIL: BE CLEAR. AND THEN SECRETARY… LET'S SEE… COUNCIL: MICHAELA, FROM YOUR KNOWLEDGE ON THE, EXHIBIT 8, IS THE NUMBER OF PICKUP STALLS NOTED ON THERE? IT'S NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE ACTUAL RESOLUTION. IF YOU WOULD LIKE, FOR JUST CLARITY'S SAKE, WE CAN ADD A CONDITION OF APPROVAL SAYING THAT THE MAXIMUM PICKUP STALLS IS 12. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: NOT TO THROW ANOTHER, YOU KNOW, ANOTHER THING AT YOU, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON. NO WORRIES. COUNCIL: OKAY, COMMISSIONER HERZOG, YOU STILL WANT IT, VOTED SEPARATELY, THOUGH, CORRECT? WELL, WE'RE… I MEAN, THE MOTION IS JUST TO AMEND THE STAFF REPORT, SO WE ARE VOTING SEPARATELY RIGHT NOW. WE SHOULDN'T BE TALKING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE. THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR IS TO APPROVE… COUNCIL: 12, AND THEN WE CAN MOVE… WE CAN MOVE ON FROM THERE TO ADDITIONAL APPROVALS. COUNCIL: OKAY, SPECIFICALLY, THIS WOULD BE FOR CHANGING THE STAFF REPORT FROM NUMBER OF PICKUP STALLS FROM 20 TO 12. WELL, ADDING, IT'S ADDING… ADDING. COUNCIL: ADDING A MAXIMUM OF 12. THERE'S NO INDICATION COUNCIL: RIGHT, THERE'S NO INDICATION. IN THE STAFF REPORT, THERE IS A… SO YOU WOULD BE CHANGING THE STAFF REPORT FROM 20 TO 12. IN YOUR NEXT APPROVAL, YOU WOULD BE ADDING THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL TO LIMIT IT TO 12 STALLS. COUNCIL: IF THAT'S CORRECT, CHRISTINE. COUNCIL: YEAH, THAT'S CORRECT. SO THERE… YES. IT NEEDS TO GO STEP BY STEP. COUNCIL: SO, WE NEED A ROLL CALL. CORRECT. COUNCIL: YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? NO, AND MY NO IS BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE ANY… I'M NOT CONVINCED THAT ANY INCREASE IN PICKUP STALLS IS NEEDED, SO THAT'S WHY I'M A NO. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? YES. COUNCIL: AND CHAIR ERIC JOHNSON. YES. COUNCIL: OKAY, SO THAT MOTION PASSES TO… COUNCIL: AMEND THE STAFF REPORT FROM 20 TO 12 FOR PICKUP LANES. COUNCIL: MIKE. COUNCIL: MR. CHAIR, YOU MIGHT WANT TO ANNOUNCE THAT THE VOTE WAS 5-1-1 FOR PEOPLE THAT COUNCIL: OR LISTENING, AND MAYBE GET TO HEAR IT REAL CLEARLY. YES, THANK YOU, YEAH, SO THAT PASSED, 5 YES, 1 NO, AND ONE, IS ABSENT. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: OKAY, SO WE'LL MOVE THROUGH THIS, STEP BY STEP. SO THE NEXT ONE… COUNCIL: IS TO… CONSIDER THE RESOLUTION, AND SO THE COMMISSION… COUNCIL: BEFORE YOU IS THE RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE REMODEL AND THE REORGANIZATION OF THE EXTERIOR PARKING LOT FOR WALMART. COUNCIL: THE COMMISSION HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN MODIFYING THAT RESOLUTION, SO WITH YOUR PERMISSION, I WOULD GIVE YOU A SUGGESTION THAT WE ADD A CONDITION TO THE RESOLUTION, AN ITEM NUMBER 3 IN THE RESOLUTION, AS IT WERE, UNDER THE… COUNCIL: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PICKUP SPACES WITHIN THE REMODEL BE 12, COUNCIL: AND IF THAT IS ACCEPTABLE, ONE OF YOU COULD MOVE TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION WITH THAT AMENDMENT. COUNCIL: SO MOVED AS STATED BY SETH. COUNCIL: AND BASED ON THAT, I DO MOVE TO DETERMINE THAT NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO CEQA IS REQUIRED, AND TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATIONS. COUNCIL: WITH THE CONDITIONAL 12 ONLY PARKING SPACES. COUNCIL: FOR THE WALMART REMODEL PROJECT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT A. COUNCIL: YES, AND I BELIEVE WE HAD THE MOTION, CORRECT? COUNCIL: AND THEN, YOU'RE A SECOND. COUNCIL: WAS THAT ME SECOND? OKAY. YEP. THAT WAS A REALLY FORMAL SECOND. GOOD, WE'RE BEING CLEAR. EXCELLENT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, AND THANKS FOR CLARIFYING THAT. COUNCIL: I'LL TAKE THE ROLL CALL VOTE. COUNCIL: THAT WOULD BE COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES, OVERALL, BUT RECOGNIZING MY INITIAL NO FOR THE ORIGINAL PARKING SPOTS. COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON. YES. AND CHAIRMAN ERIC JOHNSON? YES. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, SO IT PASSES 6, YES, 0, AND THEN 1 ABSENT. COUNCIL: AND IF I'M… IF I MIGHT, MAKE A COMMENT, I'M SURE THE APPLICANT IS STILL ON… I HOPE THE APPLICANT'S STILL ON. AND BASED ON THE COMMENTS THAT… THAT MY, COUNCIL: COLLEAGUES HAVE MADE, I THINK THEY UNDERSTAND THAT, IF THEY WANT TO MOVE TOWARDS 20, COUNCIL: THAT THEY COME BACK TO A MEETING WITH SOME SPECIFIC COUNCIL: HARD NUMBERS THAT WILL MAKE US FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE, AND ENOUGH SAID. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 10 NOW, GENERAL BUSINESS. COUNCIL: WE HAVE ITEM 10A, GENERAL PLAN AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT. COUNCIL: SO IT LOOKS LIKE EFREN WILL, PRESENT THAT TO US, PLEASE. COUNCIL: GOOD EVENING, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, EFREN SANCHEZ, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE ITEM WE HAVE BEFORE YOU IS THE 2025 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT, WHICH IS A REPORT DESIGNED TO MONITOR THE CITY'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN. COUNCIL: STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT EACH CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION PROVIDE AN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT. THE SAME LAW REQUIRES THAT THE APR BE PRESENTED TO THE LOCAL LEGISLATIVE BODY. COUNCIL: FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING TO THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF LAND USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION, LCI, AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, HCD, BY APRIL 1ST. COUNCIL: THE HOUSING ELEMENT PORTION OF THE APR IS PREPARED THROUGH THE USE OF A STANDARDIZED EXCEL WORKBOOK ADOPTED BY ACD, WHICH IS WHY IT'S BEEN INCLUDED AS ATTACHMENT NUMBER 2. COUNCIL: IN ADDITION TO STATE LAW, THE CITY OF LINCOLN GENERAL PLAN POLICY, LU8.1 REQUIRES STAFF TO SHARE THE APR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS A PROCEDURAL MATTER. COUNCIL: WHICH IS WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY. COUNCIL: THE CITY OF LINCOLN'S GENERAL PLAN HAS A TOTAL OF 109 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES ACROSS ALL 7 ELEMENTS. THE TABLE FOUND ON THE SLIDE IS A SUMMARY OF THE PROGRESS THE CITY HAS MADE TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION. COUNCIL: ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT THESE IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES CAN BE FOUND IN ATTACHMENT 1. COUNCIL: 16% OF THE IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES ARE COMPLETED, 65% OF THEM ARE IN PROGRESS, AND 19% OF THEM ARE YET TO BE INITIATED. COUNCIL: THE 2008 GENERAL PLAN GUIDES THE ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY WITH A PLANNING HORIZON OF 2050. COUNCIL: REPRESENTING A BUILT-OUT POPULATION OF 132 RESIDENTS. COUNCIL: THIS SLIDE IS A SUMMARY OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS AVAILABLE IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT PORTION OF THE APR, ATTACHMENT NUMBER 2. COUNCIL: IN 2025, THE CITY PERMITTED 411 DWELLING UNITS. COUNCIL: OF THOSE, 12 WERE ACCESSORY DULLING UNITS, OR ADUS. COUNCIL: CURRENTLY, WE ARE IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT 6 CYCLE, WHICH SPANS FROM MAY 15, 2021 TO MAY 15, 2029. COUNCIL: THE STATE HAS ASSIGNED THE CITY OF LINCOLN A REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION, AKA RENA, OF 5,120 UNITS. COUNCIL: THE CITY'S PROGRESS SO FAR HAS BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE 2,886 UNITS TOWARDS OUR RHNA GOAL. COUNCIL: WHICH LEAVES US A REMAINING BALANCE OF 2,287 UNITS BY THE TIME WE REACH THE END OF THE SIXTH CYCLE, WHICH IS IN MAY OF 2029. COUNCIL: GREEN NUMBERS THEMSELVES ARE PLANNING TARGETS, NOT DIRECT BUILD QUOTA, SO THE STATE GENERALLY DOES NOT FINE OR PENALIZE A CITY SIMPLY BECAUSE THE MARKET DID NOT PRODUCE ENOUGH HOUSING AT THOSE INCOME CATEGORIES. COUNCIL: SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES ARE TRIGGERED WHEN A CITY FAILS TO ADOPT AND MAINTAIN A HOUSING ELEMENT IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE, AND FAILS TO PLAN AND ZONE ENOUGH LAND TO ACCOMMODATE ITS RENA. COUNCIL: THE CONSEQUENCES INCLUDE REDUCED LOCAL DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY, SUCH AS BUILDER'S REMEDY. COUNCIL: INCREASED LITIGATION RISK AND LOSS OF ELIGIBILITY OR COMPETITIVENESS FOR CERTAIN STATE-FUNDED PROGRAMS. COUNCIL: SO AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THE SLIDE, THIS IS THE, COUNCIL: 8-YEAR CYCLE STARTING WITH 2021, AND IT EXPANDS UP TO 2029. SO, IN THIS GRAPH, YOU CAN SEE EVERY, ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT THAT WE'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS, BY AFFORDABILITY CATEGORY. COUNCIL: YOU CAN SEE HERE, IN 2024, IT WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE COLORFUL AS FAR AS, LIKE, THE AFFORDABILITY ASPECT OF IT, AND THEN IN 2025, WE WERE… MOST… MAJORITY OF THEM WERE ABOVE MODERATE AT 396. COUNCIL: AND THEN THERE WAS A FEW THAT WERE, LIKE, LOW-INCOME, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, COUNCIL: FOR A TOTAL OF 411 BUILDING UNITS. AND THEN THIS IS OUR SUM, SO WE WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE OUR ABOVE-MODERATE CATEGORY, AND I CAN GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION ON THE NEXT SLIDE ABOUT THAT. COUNCIL: AS PART OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT, I REVIEWED PERMIT RECORDS FOR THE 411 DWELLING UNITS, AND CLASSIFIED EACH UNIT INTO FIVE HCD AFFORDABLE CATEGORIES. COUNCIL: SO, AGAIN, THOSE ARE THE EXTREMELY LOW INCOME, VERY LOW INCOME, LOW, MODERATE, AND ABOVE MODERATE. SO ANYTHING THAT'S IN BLUE IS ESSENTIALLY AFFORDABLE. ANYTHING ABOVE MODERATE, THAT'S JUST MARKET RATE. COUNCIL: AND SO… UNDER ACA'S AFFORDABILITY THRESHOLDS, HOMES SELLING FOR MORE THAN $412K ARE NOT CONSIDERED AFFORDABLE. COUNCIL: THAT'S CHALLENGING IN LINCOLN BECAUSE THE AVERAGE SALE PRICE IS ABOUT $319 PER SQUARE FOOT. COUNCIL: AT THAT PRICE POINT, A HOME WOULD NEED TO BE ROUGHLY 1,200 SQUARE FEET. COUNCIL: TO FALL WITHIN THE MODERATE INCOME OR AFFORDABLE RANGE. COUNCIL: ON THE RENTAL SIDE, ADUS AND ONE-BEDROOM APARTMENTS TYPICALLY RENT ABOUT, 1,600 TO $2,255 PER MONTH. COUNCIL: AS A RESULT, THE PORTABLE UNITS WE WERE ABLE TO DOCUMENT IN THIS APR WERE PRIMARILY ADUS, INCLUDING GARAGE-CONVERTED ADUS. COUNCIL: SO AGAIN, HERE'S THE FIGURES, ANYTHING ABOVE… 412K… THAT'S ABOVE MODERATE. COUNCIL: AND SO, AND THIS IS, LIKE, THE MORTGAGE PRICE PER, YOU KNOW, AND THEN THE RENTAL PRICE. COUNCIL: YEAH. COUNCIL: JUST SOME CONTEXT. AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE AMI, WHICH MEANS COUNCIL: AREA MEDIUM INCOME IS $120K FOR A FAMILY OF 4. COUNCIL: JUST PROVIDING SOME CONTEXT. COUNCIL: THAT LEADS US TO OUR RECOMMENDATIONS. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIVE AND FILE THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT, APR.ATTACHMENTS, AND TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTION. COUNCIL: DETERMINE THAT THE GENERAL PLAN AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ARE NOT PROJECTS UNDER SECTION 15378 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES. AND TWO, REVIEW THE 2025 GENERAL PLAN AND HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS COUNCIL: AND RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECEIVE AND AUTHORIZE THE REPORTS BE SENT TO HCD AND LCI. COUNCIL: NEXT STEPS WOULD BE FOR THE SAME REPORTS TO BE SENT OVER TO CITY COUNCIL ON THE MARCH 10TH, 2026. COUNCIL: CITY COUNCIL MEETING, AND WE ARE GOING TO REQUEST CITY COUNCIL REVIEW AND ACCEPT THE 2025 APRS, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO FILE THE REPORT COUNCIL: WITH LCI AND HCD BY THEIR APRIL 1ST STATUTORY DEADLINE. COUNCIL: THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATIONS. LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. COUNCIL: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU, MY FRIEND, FOR THAT PRESENTATION. DO ANY OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? COUNCIL: FOR EPHRAIM? COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON? COUNCIL: HI, JUAN, THIS IS RELATIVE TO THE GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION, THE IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES, WHICH YOU UNDERSTANDABLY DID NOT GO THROUGH IN DETAIL. COUNCIL: BUT IN LIEU OF THAT, I'M WONDERING IF YOU OR NITA COULD, TELL US WHAT THE… COUNCIL: TOP PRIORITY WILL BE IN 2026 IN TERMS OF IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES, YOU KNOW, THE TOP 3, 5, WHATEVER. COUNCIL: FOR THE… FOR THE BROADER GENERAL PLAN, OR THE DOWNTOWN UPDATE? COUNCIL: EITHER? COUNCIL: OKAY, WE'LL GO WITH THE DOWNTOWN UPDATE, JUST BECAUSE IT'S A BIT MORE LOCALIZED AND EASIER. WE'RE, WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE HOLDING A COMMUNITY MEETING ON COUNCIL: THE 13TH? MARCH 13TH? COUNCIL: IS THAT DATE RIGHT IN MY HEAD? 14TH, WHICH IS A SATURDAY? OKAY. IN ORDER TO GAIN ADDITIONAL OUTPUT FOR… OR, I'M SORRY, INPUT FOR THE DOWNTOWN PLAN. COUNCIL: AND WE WILL HAVE ONE MORE COMMUNITY MEETING AFTER THAT, AND THEN ONCE WE GET ALL THAT INPUT COMPILED, WE'LL FINALIZE THAT AND BRING IT FORWARD TO THIS BODY, AND THEN CITY COUNCIL. COUNCIL: HOPEFULLY, LATE SUMMER, KNOCK ON WOOD? COUNCIL: TO GET THAT ADOPTED BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR. AND THEN AS FAR AS THE DOWNTOWN PLAN GOES, WE ARE LOOKING AT, COUNCIL: REMIND ME, MEL, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT? COUNCIL: COMING UP THIS YEAR? YEAH, WE HAVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT. WE'RE LOOKING INTO, INCREASING THE DENSITY. COUNCIL: FROM 20… THE HGR DENSITY FROM 20… UP TO 30 DWELLING UNITS ON AN ACRE, WHICH, OF COURSE, WOULD, ASSIST THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN, BECAUSE THAT ONE IS… COUNCIL: GONNA GO HIGHER, PLUS IT'S ADDING MORE UNITS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, SO HAVING THE, HIGHER AMOUNT, THE HIGHER RANGE, BUMPED UP TO 30 UNITS, PER ACRE. COUNCIL: WOULD BE A NECESSARY STEP IN THE G… AND THAT'S ONE OF THE ACTION ITEMS IN THE MEASURES THAT'S IDENTIFIED. COUNCIL: THERE. YEAH, WHAT MEL'S REFERRING TO, THAT'S ONE OF THE ACTION MEASURES OR IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT, TO INCREASE THE DENSITY IN THE HDR, SO THAT WOULD BE ONE OF THE… COUNCIL: RIGHT NOW WE HAVE 32 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT, SO THEN IF THAT'S ONE OF THE PROJECTS THAT'S ONGOING, NUMBER 20… ON THE 25 ON THE TABLE THAT I HAVE. COUNCIL: LISTED HERE, SO HOPEFULLY, YOU KNOW, WE CAN MOVE THAT FROM THE CATEGORY OF ONGOING TO THEN COMPLETED. COUNCIL: IN THE NEXT CALENDAR YEAR. COUNCIL: FOR THIS CALENDAR YEAR. COUNCIL: ANYTHING WITH REGARD TO THE AIRPORT? COUNCIL: WELL, IN FACT, THE AIRPORT IS, CURRENTLY, LOOKING TO BRING ON A POTENTIAL NEW MANAGER, CONTRACT MANAGER TO, HELP, PROMOTE THE, COUNCIL: THE BUSINESS OF, RUNNING THE AIRPORT, PROVIDING MORE AVAILABILITY FOR FUELING OF THE AIRPORT. IN ADDITION, I'M SURE YOU'RE AWARE OF THE CONSTRUCTION THAT'S GOING ON OUT THERE WITH THE HANGARS FROM, THE FULL THROTTLE PROJECT, AND THERE'S A SECOND HANGAR PROJECT THAT IS GONNA BE COMING ONLINE AS WELL. COUNCIL: WE ARE LOOKING AT, SOME COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE 84 ACRES ADJACENT TO THE AIRPORT. SO WE'RE… WE REALLY FEEL THAT THE AIRPORT, WHICH HAS BEEN A FINANCIAL STRUGGLE FOR COUNCIL: DECADES, WE'LL SAY, IS GOING TO BE FULLY SELF… FISCALLY SELF-SUSTAINING WITHIN THE NEXT 5 YEARS. COUNCIL: HOW ABOUT A SOLAR FARM IN SOME OF THOSE ACRES? YEAH, WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE, AS PART OF THE CITY'S SOLAR PROJECT, A RESBECK FIELD, OUT… IT'S KIND OF MORE ON THE CORP YARD AREA THAN IT IS THE AIRPORT AREA, BUT IT'S ADJACENT TO THE AIRPORT. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: I HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: SO WITH THAT, I CAN MAKE A MOTION, RIGHT? COUNCIL: OKAY, AS A CHAIR. SO, COUNCIL: WITH THAT, I MOVE TO DETERMINE THAT THIS ITEM IS NOT A PROJECT UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES, AND TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL RECEIVE AND AUTHORIZE THE APR BE SENT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNCIL: HCD, AND GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF LCI. LOT OF ACRONYMS IN THERE. COUNCIL: I'LL SECOND. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. COUNCIL: ROLL CALL, PLEASE. YOU CAN… YOU WANT A ROLL CALL? YOU CAN DO A VOICE CALL IF YOU WANT. WE'LL DO A VOICE CALL. OKAY. ALRIGHT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ABSTENTIONS? NONE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: MOTION PASSES. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, ITEM NUMBER 11, WE'LL MOVE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORTS, AND WE HAVE, NITA RACKER, INTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, PLEASE. COUNCIL: I FEEL LIKE I JUST GAVE MY REPORT. COUNCIL: BUT BESIDES THAT, YOU DO HAVE THE TRACKER IN YOUR PACKET. IF YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS ON PROJECTS THAT MIGHT BE COMING FORWARD, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE GROVE IS ON THERE ON THE FIRST LINE, AND THAT JUST GOT LOADED PRIOR TO THE AGENDA BEING FINALIZED, AND SO THAT ONE'S DONE, RIGHT? KNOCKED THAT ONE OFF THE LIST. BUT IF YOU HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. COUNCIL: OKAY. I DO WANT TO SAY THAT, MY REGULAR CONTACT COORDINATION WITH YOUR COMMISSION ABOUT, UPCOMING PC ITEMS, SO I'LL BE… COUNCIL: DOING THAT NEXT… THE FIRST WEEK OF MARCH, BECAUSE WE HAVE… COUNCIL: A HANDFUL OF PROJECTS. ONE OF THEM IS THE WEST LINCOLN SQUARE. COUNCIL: DEVELOPMENT. TOM WILL BE PRESENTING THAT. HEAVY-DUTY DOCUMENTS, IT'S THE FIRST COMMERCIAL PROJECT COUNCIL: IN THE SIDE B AREA, RIGHT THERE AT THE CORNER OF HIGHWAY 65 AND NELSON LANE. COUNCIL: IT'S A BIG PROJECT. IT'S, WILL SUPPORT, OF COURSE, THE, THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. THERE'S AN ONGOING, DEVELOPMENT THERE THAT'S PART OF SUB B, BUT THIS IS THE SISTER PROPERTY THAT'S DONE COMMERCIAL. COUNCIL: YOU'RE ON THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. COUNCIL: HEARD THAT A FEW TIMES, A COUPLE TIMES, SO WE'RE THERE, AND WE'LL BE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. COUNCIL: SO WE'LL GET THE DOCUMENTATION PUT TOGETHER, AND WE'LL REACH OUT TO YOUR COMMISSION IF ANYONE'S INTERESTED IN HAVING A… COUNCIL: ADVANCED MEETING WITH STAFF TO GO OVER THE DETAILS OF THAT. COUNCIL: YEAH, WE DO ENCOURAGE THE COMMISSIONERS TO TRY TO MEET WITH US PRIOR TO THE… TO THESE MEETINGS, BECAUSE AS YOU… AS YOU HAVE MADE NOTE, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE… SOME OF THE PROJECTS ARE PRETTY HEAVY. COUNCIL: AND IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO CONNECT WITH STAFF, ASK YOUR QUESTIONS, AND ALSO IF THERE'S ISSUES THAT WE CAN RELATE TO THE DEVELOPER IN ADVANCE OF COMING HERE, WE'LL BE HAPPY TO DO THAT. COUNCIL: YES, AND THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP, AND THANKS TO MELAN IFRIN FOR BEING AVAILABLE THIS LAST TIME. I TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THAT AND FOUND IT VERY HELPFUL. COUNCIL: AND THANKS FOR BEING ACCOMMODATING AS WELL. YOU KNOW, I WORK IN SACRAMENTO PRETTY MUCH EVERY DAY, SO, HARD TO MAKE IT ONSITE IN PERSON, BUT YOU WERE WILLING TO ACCOMMODATE A TEAM'S COUNCIL: VIRTUAL MEETING, SO THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. IT WAS HELPFUL FOR PREPARING THIS. SO, JUST LIKE TO REMIND AND ENCOURAGE, FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, YOU KNOW, IF YOU HAVE A CHANCE. COUNCIL: I'M SURE YOU FOUND IT HELPFUL, AND I FOUND IT HELPFUL. SO THANKS FOR BEING AVAILABLE TO DO THAT. COUNCIL: WITH THAT, WE WILL MOVE TO COMMISSIONER COMMENTS, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND START TO MY RIGHT. COUNCIL: WITH, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER. COUNCIL: YEAH, I JUST WANT TO SAY THIS IS MY FINAL MEETING. I'M RESIGNING. I'M SAD THAT I WON'T BE ABLE TO CONTINUE WITH YOU GUYS. KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK. COUNCIL: KEEPING LINCOLN STRONG AND UNIQUE IN PLACER COUNTY, AND… COUNCIL: IT'S BEEN A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH EACH ONE OF YOU, AND RESPECT AND APPRECIATE, YOU KNOW, ALL THE EFFORT YOU PUT IN. I'VE BEEN IMPRESSED, AND WISH TONY WAS HERE JUST TO HEAR THIS AS WELL. I'VE BEEN IMPRESSED WITH THE WAY YOU GUYS GO ABOUT COUNCIL: REVIEWING PROJECTS AND ASKING THOUGHTFUL QUESTIONS, AND I LOVE THIS PLACE. I'VE BEEN IN LINCOLN FOR 25 YEARS, AND SAD TO… SAD TO STEP DOWN FROM THIS REALLY IMPORTANT ROLE. COUNCIL: AND I'LL BE PRAYING AND HOPEFUL THAT SOMEONE HERE WILL REPLACE ME AND CONTINUE THE GOOD WORK WITH YOUR TEAM. SO THANK YOU, EVERYONE. COUNCIL: WELL, I JUST WANTED TO WISH YOU ALL KINDS OF SUCCESS ON YOUR NEW ENDEAVOR. I THINK IT'S EXCITING FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY, SO, COUNCIL: GOOD SPEED TO YOU FOR THAT. COUNCIL: YEAH, NATHAN, BEST OF LUCK TO YOU. WE DIDN'T GET TO KNOW EACH OTHER VERY WELL, BUT THE LITTLE TIME THAT WE DID WORK TOGETHER, I REALLY DID APPRECIATE YOUR THO

MINUTES CITY OF LINCOLN PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting February 18, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER –Chair Eric Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL – Commissioners present: Gilbert, Herzog, Hutchinson, Jackson, E.Johnson, J.Johnson. Various Staff and Public were also in attendance in person and via Zoom. Commissioner Manning was absent with notification. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Nathan Herzog. 4. AGENDA MODIFICATION – None. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION – None. 6. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF Nita Wracker, Interim Community Development Director, explained the software glitch of the production of the Agenda and Agenda Packet for this meeting. 7. DISCLOSURE OF EXPARTE COMMUNICATION – None. 8. CONSENT – 8.A. Review and approve January 21, 2026 meeting minutes 8.B. The Grove - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area) 8.C. Liberty at Lincoln Village 1 and Liberty at Lincoln Village 2 - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 7 Specific Plan Area) Commissioner J. Johnson pulled Items 8B and 8C. Motioned (Offered by Commissioner J.Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Herzog) to approve the January 21, 2026 meeting minutes. Unanimously Approved by voice call vote with no opposition (6-0-0-1). Items pulled: 8.B. The Grove - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area) 8.C. Liberty at Lincoln Village 1 and Liberty at Lincoln Village 2 - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 7 Specific Plan Area) Commissioner J.Johnson expressed the differences of the pedestrian and bicycle circulation plans and purposes of the trail systems of The Grove and Liberty of Lincoln Villages 1/2 projects, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. 8.B. The Grove - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area) Motioned (Offered by Commissioner J. Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Gilbert) to adopt the Resolution Approving the Specific Development Plan/Development Permit application for The Grove project within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area. Approved by the following roll call vote: J.Johnson – Aye, Gilbert – Aye, Herzog – Aye, Hutchinson – Aye, Jackson – Aye, and E.Johnson – Aye (6-0-0-1)

PC 02/18/26 Minutes 8.C. Liberty at Lincoln Village 1 and Liberty at Lincoln Village 2 - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 7 Specific Plan Area) With Commissioner Herzog’s inquiry into whether a public comment is needed (which is to the discretion of Chair E.Johnson), Chair E.Johnson opened and closed a public hearing at 6:10 P.M. with no public comments. Kristine Mollenkopf requested to vote on the resolutions separately. Motioned (Offered by Commissioner J. Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Gilbert) to adopt the Resolution Approving the Specific Development Plan/Development Permit application for The New Home Company Village 1 of Liberty at Lincoln, subject to the findings and conditions of approval. Approved by the following roll call vote: J.Johnson – Aye, Gilbert – Aye, Herzog – Aye, Hutchinson – Aye, Jackson – Aye, and E.Johnson – Aye (6-0-0-1). Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Herzog, seconded by Commissioner Gilbert) to adopt the Resolution Approving the Specific Development Plan/Development Permit application for The New Home Company Village 2 of Liberty at Lincoln, subject to the findings and conditions of approval. Approved by the following roll call vote: Herzog – Aye, Gilbert – Aye, Hutchinson – Aye, Jackson – Aye, J.Johnson – Aye, and E.Johnson – Aye (6-0-0-1). 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS – 9.A Walmart Remodel - Design Review Modification Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, consider the information contained in the staff report and testimony of the public and take the following actions: 1. Determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities). 2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Design Review Modification application for Walmart Remodel with project-specific and typical conditions of approval (Attachment 1). Mikaela Noble, Associate Planner, presented to the Commission, including the PowerPoint presentation and the February 13, 2026 Memorandum, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. Commissioner J.Johnson commented on the color scheme. Chair E.Johnson opened and closed the public hearing at 6:18 P.M. with no public comments. The Commission continued discussion with Ms. Noble, Jenn Guetzlaff from Kimley Horn, representatives of Walmart, and Planning Manager Rommel Pabalinas responding to questions and comments. Commissioner Gilbert motioned, seconded by Commissioner Hutchinson to accept the staff report with the change of designated pick-up stalls from 20 to 12. Since there is a motion to change to the staff report, Attorney Mollenkopf suggested re-opening a public hearing. Chair E.Johnson re-opened and closed the public hearing at 6:47 P.M. with no public comments. Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Gilbert, seconded by Commissioner Hutchinson) to accept the staff report with the change of designated pick-up stalls from 20 to 12. Approved by the following roll call vote: Gilbert - Aye, Hutchinson – Aye, Herzog – Nay, Jackson – Aye, J.Johnson – Aye, and E.Johnson – Aye (5-1-0-1)

PC 02/18/26 Minutes Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Gilbert, seconded by Commissioner Jackson) to adopt a Resolution Approving the Design Review Modification application for Walmart Remodel with project- specific and typical conditions of approval, adding “A maximum of 12 parking stalls total can be designated for customer pickup order only”, and find the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Approved by the following roll call vote: Gilbert - Aye, Jackson – Aye, Herzog – Aye, Hutchinson – Aye, J.Johnson – Aye, and E.Johnson – Aye (6-0-0-1) 10. GENERAL BUSINESS – 10.A General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) Efren Sanchez, Senior Planner, presented to the Commission a PowerPoint presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. Motioned (offered by Chair E.Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Hutchinson) to determine that the General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report is not a project under the CEQA guidelines and to recommend that the City Council receive and authorize the APR be sent to the State of California HCD and Govern’s Office of LCI. Unanimously Approved by voice call vote with no opposition (6-0-0-1). 11. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORTS Interim Director Wracker reported on the Planning Entitlement Tracker. Manager Pabalinas mentioned projects that will be coming forth to the Commission and offered pre- meetings with anyone who would like to review the items. Interim Director Wracker and Chair E.Johnson reminded and encouraged Commissioners to take advantage of meeting with staff. 12. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS – Commissioner Herzog announced his resignation as Planning Commissioner and this is his final meeting. Commissioner Herzog thanked everyone and mentioned to the Commission to keep up the great work on keeping Lincoln strong and unique. Commissioner Hutchinson wished Commissioner Herzog success on his endeavor. Commissioner Jackson wished Commissioner Herzog best of luck, appreciated his thoughtful insight, and thanked him. Commissioner J.Johnson expressed he enjoyed working with Commissioner Herzog, stated Commissioner Herzog made a major contribution the Commission, liked Commissioner Herzog’s spirit at this meeting and wished it could continue, and said, “Godspeed and Best Wishes.” Chair E.Johnson thanked Commissioner Herzog for his service, stated it was a pleasure to serve with him, and wished him and his family the best. Staff also thanked Commissioner Herzog and said he will be missed. 13. ADJOURNMENT – Chair E.Johnson adjourned the meeting at 7:12 P.M. Submitted by: Eugenie Guadron, Planning Commission Secretary

8.B. The Grove Attachment 7

! " #! $ %$! $ &'()*)+,-./012324+5)678)59:;6+)<71;67=>??@ABCDEBF>G>FH?@I JKLMNOPQPDP RJS>TFU?@V>WIH?@I XYZ[\Z\]Z^_ZY`Zabcdbebf

8.C. Lib. at Lin. Villages 1 & 2 Attachment 11

!"#$%&'()*+,-(.(/0'$123$4(56/0(7

9.A. Walmart Remodel Handout

MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Mikaela Noble, Associate Planner DATE: February 13, 2026 RE: Agenda Item 9A: Walmart Remodel – Design Review Modification Staff is providing this memorandum in response to technical difficulties with our agenda distribution software. As such, item 9A (Walmart Remodel – Design Review Modification) displays incorrect and missing information. We are working with the software company to rectify this issue; however, staff wanted to provide the complete documentation to allow for adequate review. Attached you’ll find the complete staff report and associated attachments for the project. The following features have been updated in the attached staff report: • Table 1 – the posted agenda shows “-14” (highlighted in yellow below); however, the correct figure is “14”. We’ve also heard that some staff report versions show the number of existing customer/associate stalls as “11”; however, the correct version is “111”. o Incorrect/Posted: o Correct:

Agenda Item 9A February 13, 202 Page 2 of 2 • Attachment 3 – Some users cannot open the agenda file for Attachment 3. The file is included in the attached staff report. We apologize for the inconvenience. Attachments: 1. Item 9A (Walmart Remodel – Design Review Modification) Staff Report and Associated Attachments

SUBJECT: Walmart Remodel - Design Review Modification SUBMITTED BY: Mikaela Noble DEPARTMENT: Community Development DATE: February 18, 2026 Item Number 9.A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, consider the information contained in the staff report and testimony of the public and take the following actions: 1. Determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities). 2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Design Review Modification application for Walmart Remodel with project-specific and typical conditions of approval (Attachment 1). BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: The Walmart Neighborhood Market (Walmart) is an existing grocery store located at 255 Lincoln Boulevard within Downtown Lincoln and is zoned Commercial (C) (Attachment 2). The project site is bounded by existing commercial development to the north, south and west. The Summerset Senior Living Facility is located east of the project site. The project is subject to Titles 16 (Signs) and 18 (Zoning) of the Lincoln Municipal Code (LMC) and the Lincoln Downtown Urban Design Plan (LDUDP). The existing Walmart is a 41,478 square foot (SF) grocery store and pharmacy, with 123 parking stalls. Four access driveways are provided in total, with two on 2nd Street and two on 3rd Street (see Attachment 3). The applicant has requested to modify an existing Design Review approval to do the following: revise the exterior paint color scheme palette, update existing signage, and restripe the parking lot (Attachment 3). The existing color scheme utilizes warm, earthy tones as seen in Attachment 3. As proposed, the project would repaint the existing building using shades of gray, black, white and blue. Wall and freestanding signs would be replaced and updated to reflect the new color scheme. The existing wall signs total area would be reduced from 238.96 SF to 124.46 SF. No alterations to the freestanding sign structure are being proposed; the sign face is being updated to reflect Walmart’s new branding style. Lastly, the applicant proposes to restripe the parking lot’s 123 parking stalls and convert 14 stalls into pickup-only (Table 1). STAFF REPORT 1

Table 1 Parking Stalls Existing vs. Proposed Stall Type Existing Proposed Difference Customer/Associate 111 97 -14 ADA 6 6 0 EV 0 0 0 Pickup 6 20 14 Cart Corrals 6 6 0 Total (excluding pickup stalls) 117 103 -14 Total (including pickup stalls) 123 123 0 FINDINGS/ANALYSIS: LMC Title 18 (Zoning) The project modifications do not result in an expanded building area, only alterations to the exterior paint color scheme, signage and parking lot. LMC Section 18.44.20 states that off- street parking requirements are implemented with the erection or expansion of units or building dimension. As the proposed project does not result in an expanded building area, requirements for additional parking are not applicable. The proposed exterior modifications to the approved Design Review to Walmart are consistent with the applicable requirements of LMC Title 18. LMC Title 16 (Signs) LMC Title 16 regulates for signs within the City. Pursuant to Section 16.02.010, commercial wall signs are allotted two square feet per one linear foot of frontage. Walmart’s frontage is approximately 320 linear feet, which would permit a maximum sign area of 640 SF. The project proposes to install wall signs not to exceed 125 SF. Therefore, the proposed wall signs comply with LMC Title 16. The freestanding sign is considered to be a legal, nonconforming structure as its installation predates the City’s sign ordinance. The existing freestanding sign and sign face are approximately 22 feet tall and 46 SF, respectively. The applicant is proposing to change the sign face color from green to blue, and remove the yellow spark icon to simply the sign. Per LMC Section 16.01.110, legal nonconforming signs shall be permitted to remain as long as the sign is not relocated or replaced; the structure, height or size of sign is altered; or at least 50% of the sign’s value is damaged or destroyed. Face changes and normal maintenance are permitted and do not constitute alteration. The project does not propose to replace or alter the sign, and are only changing the sign face to reflect Walmart’s updated branding. Therefore, the freestanding sign complies with LMC Title 16. Lincoln Downtown Urban Design Plan The LDUDP provides guidelines on development within Downtown Lincoln. The project site is located within District 1 Historic Old Town Commercial. LDUDP guidelines state that a variety of materials/colors are present on buildings within Downtown and provides recommendations on what new buildings should incorporate. Color suggestions are not included in the recommendations list. As this project does not involve construction of a new building or alterations to the existing façade materials, the Walmart Remodel Project is not 2

subject to these guidelines. LDUDP District 1 guidelines include recommendations for signage criteria. The project proposes to replace wall signage and update the freestanding sign copy to reflect Walmart’s branding. The LDUDP signage recommendation include readability, discouragement of window displays and emphasis on design considerations based on business type. The proposed signs are easy to read and reflect the business’ brand. No window signs are being proposed with this project. As such, the project is consistent with the LDUDP. Parking recommendations are provided in the LDUDP; however, as the proposed project does not result in an expanded building area or site layout alterations, therefore, the LDUDP parking recommendations are not applicable. Design Review Board The Walmart Remodel Project was reviewed by the Design Review Board (DRB) on January 30, 2026. The DRB reviewed the submitted materials during the scheduled meeting. After a brief presentation by staff and a member of the applicant team, the DRB and applicant discussed the project materials. Conversation ensued regarding the parking lot and freestanding sign. The DRB did not provide any modification requests for the proposed project and unanimously recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. Conditions of Approval To ensure timely and orderly implementation of the project, the proposed Design Review Modifications for the Walmart Remodel Project is subject to specific conditions of approval. Implementation of the applicable conditions of approval would ensure that specific site alterations are installed according to City design standards. These conditions are included as Exhibit A in the Resolution (Attachment 1). The project applicant has reviewed and accepted the conditions of approval as written. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project consists of modifications for the existing Walmart Neighborhood Market, including revisions to the exterior paint color scheme, replacement of signage and parking lot striping. The project is found to be exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), because the project involves minor alterations to an existing building and parking lot, and does not expand the existing use. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 Walmart Remodel PC Resolution with Conditions draft.pdf Attachment 2 Project Location.pdf Attachment 3 Site Plan and Elevations.pdf Attachment 4 Existing WNM.pdf Attachment 5 Example WNM.pdf 3

9.A. Walmart Remodel Presentation

WALMART REMODEL PROJECT Design Review Modification Item 9A / February 18, 2026 / Mikaela Noble, Associate Planner

• Design Review Modification REQUESTED ENTITLEMENTS

PROJECT SITE • 255 Lincoln Boulevard • Zoned Commercial (C) • Lincoln Municipal Code and Lincoln Downtown Urban Design Plan 3 rd Street 2 nd Street Lincoln Blvd Project Site

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

5 ELEVATIONS

FREESTANDING SIGN UPDATE

−Project is consistent with: −General Plan −Lincoln Municipal Code − Title 16 – Signs − Title 18 – Zoning −Lincoln Downtown Urban Design Plan −Design Review Board −January 30, 2026: Recommended approval FINDINGS

−City staff has prepared Draft Conditions of Approval for the project: −Ensure orderly and timely implementation of the project −Standard & project-specific conditions −Subject to verification of compliance by City departments CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

−Staff recommends PC: −Determine project exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) −Adopt resolution approving Design Review Modification for Walmart Remodel project RECOMMENDATION

END OF PRESENTATION

10.A. Annual Progress Report

Annual Progress Reports (APRs) 2025 General Plan APR & 2025 Housing Element APR Item 10A / Planning Commission / February 18, 2026 / Efren Sanchez, Senior Planner

• CA Gov. Code § 65400 – Implementation of Plan; Annual Report −The GP APR must be provided by April 1 st annually to: − Local Legislative body (City Council), − Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), and − California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) • General Plan Policy LU-8.1 −The City shall review and report to the Planning Commission and City Council on the status of implementation of the General Plan annually as required by State Law. State Law and General Plan Policy

General Plan – APR General Plan Element Status of Implementation Measures Total Completed On-Going Incomplete Economic Development 20 7 11 2 Land Use & Community Design 8 1 7 Transportation & Circulation 13 5 6 2 Public Facilities & Services 11 1 10 Open Space & Conservation 7 1 6 Health & Safety 18 0 6 12 Housing 32 2 25 5 All Elements 109 17 71 21 The City of Lincoln’s General Plan has 109 Implementation Measures • Completed 16%, On-going 65%, Incomplete 19% • The 2008 General Plan guides the orderly development of the City with a planning horizon to 2050, representing a buildout population of 132,000 residents.

• 2025 – Issued permits: 411 dwelling units. −12 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Progress −Housing Element 6 th Cycle 05/15/2021- 05/15/2029 −Total RHNA 5,120 units − 2,886 Units added in 2021- 2025 − 2,287 Units remaining goal by 2029 Housing Element – APR

RHNA Progress 1 Projection Period 3 4 RHNA Allocation by Income Level Projection Period - 06/30/2021- 05/14/2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Units to Date (all years) Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - 19 - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - 20 - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - 146 6 - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - 434 116 164 4 9 - - - - Above Moderate 1,915 - 1 744 294 533 396 - - - - 1,968 - 5,120 - 435 860 458 722 411 - - - - 2,886 2,287 Acutely Low - - Total Units 80 Total RHNA - 750 Low Extremely Low - 727 Moderate 1,496 902 807 152 39 Income Level Very Low 19 - 2 Table B Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Permitted Units Issued by Affordability 1,457

Affordable Rent/Mortgage

Staff recommends the Planning Commission receive and file the information contained in the staff report, APR attachments, and take the following action: 1. Determine that the General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports are not a project under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines; and, 2. Review the 2025 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports and recommend that the City Council receive and authorize the reports be sent to the State of California Housing and Community Development and Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI). Recommendation

• March 10, 2026 – City Council • Request City Council review and accept the 2025 APRs • Adopt a Resolution authorizing staff to file the report with LCI and HCD. Next Steps

PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 18, 2026 CITY OF LINCOLN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 18, 2026 Peter Gilbert Nathan Herzog Michele Hutchinson Tim Jackson Eric Johnson, Chair Jerry Johnson Tony Manning, Vice Chair AS A COURTESY, PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 PM *** AMENDED AGENDA *** City Hall Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 OR VIRTUAL Meeting can be viewed on the City's YouTube Channel (accessed on the City's website) or WAVE Channel 18 and attended virtually via Zoom. Please join the Zoom Webinar from your computer, tablet or smartphone. You may participate in live public comment through this platform. Registration URL copy and paste this link: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_1ZYwZYxjQQa7mmALR2w-ag. You can also dial in using your phone - US: +1 (669) 900-6833 and use *9 to raise your hand to speak. Webinar ID: 882 5285 9306 600 Sixth Street ◆ Lincoln, CA 95648 ◆ www.lincolnca.gov ◆ 916-434-2400

1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS 5. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION *All speakers' time will be limited to three (3) minutes, unless extended by the Chairperson. All comments or questions should be addressed to the Chairperson and in most cases, the Commission is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but may engage in brief discussion, provide direction to City staff, or schedule items for future meetings. 6. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF 7. DISCLOSURE OF EXPARTE COMMUNICATION 8. CONSENT 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. GENERAL BUSINESS 11. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORTS 12. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF LINCOLN STAFF - Nita Wracker, Interim Comm. Dev. Director Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Rommel Pabalinas, Comm. Dev. Planning Manager SP Mann, Senior Engineer Efren Sanchez, Senior Planner Mikaela Noble, Associate Planner Thomas Cruickshank, Associate Planner Eugenie Guadron, PC Secretary 8.A Review and approve January 21, 2026 meeting minutes 8.B The Grove - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area) 8.C Liberty at Lincoln Village 1 and Liberty at Lincoln Village 2 - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 7 Specific Plan Area) 9.A Walmart Remodel - Design Review Modification 10.A General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) 11.A Planning Entitlement Tracker CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION 600 Sixth Street ◆ Lincoln, CA 95648 ◆ www.lincolnca.gov ◆ 916-434-2400

Citizens may address the Planning Commission on any item on the agenda when the item is considered. Citizens wishing to speak may request recognition from the presiding officer by raising his or her hand and stepping to the podium when requested to do so. An opportunity will be provided for citizens wishing to speak on non-agenda items to similarly request recognition and address the Planning Commission. Three-minute time limits may be placed on citizen comments. APPEALS If you wish to appeal a decision of the Planning Commission, you must have participated in the Planning Commission review of the item by submitting written testimony or oral testimony at the public hearing. The appeal is limited to those issues raised at the Planning Commission meeting. APPEAL PERIOD There is a 10-day appeal period for most Planning Commission decisions. Appeals can be made by any interested party upon payment of the appropriate fee and submittal of the appeal request to the Lincoln City Clerk or the Planning Department, 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln. WRITTEN MATERIAL INTRODUCED INTO THE RECORD Any citizen wishing to introduce written material into the record at the hearing on any item is requested to provide a copy of the written material to the Planning Department prior to the hearing date, so that the material may be distributed to the Planning Commission prior to the hearing. NOTE: Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lincoln's website at https://www.lincolnca.gov/ subject to staff's availability to post the documents before the meeting. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the City will provide special assistance for disabled members of the public. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (916) 434-2490. As a courtesy, please make every effort to inform the Clerk of your needs at least 24 hours prior to the meeting so the City may make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (including any action regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. Levine Act Provisions -- The Levine Act requires a party (or the party's agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $500 within the 12 months before the City decision. This includes contributions to Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners and members of other City boards and commissions. 600 Sixth Street ◆ Lincoln, CA 95648 ◆ www.lincolnca.gov ◆ 916-434-2400

Showing the first 24,000 of 554,547 characters. The full document is at the source.

PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 18, 2026 CITY OF LINCOLN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 18, 2026 Peter Gilbert Nathan Herzog Michele Hutchinson Tim Jackson Eric Johnson, Chair Jerry Johnson Tony Manning, Vice Chair AS A COURTESY, PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION 6:00 PM *** AMENDED AGENDA *** City Hall Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 600 Sixth Street Lincoln, CA 95648 OR VIRTUAL Meeting can be viewed on the City's YouTube Channel (accessed on the City's website) or WAVE Channel 18 and attended virtually via Zoom. Please join the Zoom Webinar from your computer, tablet or smartphone. You may participate in live public comment through this platform. Registration URL copy and paste this link: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_1ZYwZYxjQQa7mmALR2w-ag. You can also dial in using your phone - US: +1 (669) 900-6833 and use *9 to raise your hand to speak. Webinar ID: 882 5285 9306 600 Sixth Street ◆ Lincoln, CA 95648 ◆ www.lincolnca.gov ◆ 916-434-2400 1

1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS 5. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION *All speakers' time will be limited to three (3) minutes, unless extended by the Chairperson. All comments or questions should be addressed to the Chairperson and in most cases, the Commission is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but may engage in brief discussion, provide direction to City staff, or schedule items for future meetings. 6. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF 7. DISCLOSURE OF EXPARTE COMMUNICATION 8. CONSENT 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. GENERAL BUSINESS 11. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORTS 12. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF LINCOLN STAFF - Nita Wracker, Interim Comm. Dev. Director Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney Rommel Pabalinas, Comm. Dev. Planning Manager SP Mann, Senior Engineer Efren Sanchez, Senior Planner Mikaela Noble, Associate Planner Thomas Cruickshank, Associate Planner Eugenie Guadron, PC Secretary 8.A Review and approve January 21, 2026 meeting minutes 8.B The Grove - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area) 8.C Liberty at Lincoln Village 1 and Liberty at Lincoln Village 2 - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 7 Specific Plan Area) 9.A Walmart Remodel - Design Review Modification 10.A General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) 11.A Planning Entitlement Tracker CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION 600 Sixth Street ◆ Lincoln, CA 95648 ◆ www.lincolnca.gov ◆ 916-434-2400 2

Citizens may address the Planning Commission on any item on the agenda when the item is considered. Citizens wishing to speak may request recognition from the presiding officer by raising his or her hand and stepping to the podium when requested to do so. An opportunity will be provided for citizens wishing to speak on non-agenda items to similarly request recognition and address the Planning Commission. Three-minute time limits may be placed on citizen comments. APPEALS If you wish to appeal a decision of the Planning Commission, you must have participated in the Planning Commission review of the item by submitting written testimony or oral testimony at the public hearing. The appeal is limited to those issues raised at the Planning Commission meeting. APPEAL PERIOD There is a 10-day appeal period for most Planning Commission decisions. Appeals can be made by any interested party upon payment of the appropriate fee and submittal of the appeal request to the Lincoln City Clerk or the Planning Department, 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln. WRITTEN MATERIAL INTRODUCED INTO THE RECORD Any citizen wishing to introduce written material into the record at the hearing on any item is requested to provide a copy of the written material to the Planning Department prior to the hearing date, so that the material may be distributed to the Planning Commission prior to the hearing. NOTE: Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lincoln's website at https://www.lincolnca.gov/ subject to staff's availability to post the documents before the meeting. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the City will provide special assistance for disabled members of the public. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (916) 434-2490. As a courtesy, please make every effort to inform the Clerk of your needs at least 24 hours prior to the meeting so the City may make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (including any action regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. Levine Act Provisions -- The Levine Act requires a party (or the party's agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $500 within the 12 months before the City decision. This includes contributions to Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners and members of other City boards and commissions. 600 Sixth Street ◆ Lincoln, CA 95648 ◆ www.lincolnca.gov ◆ 916-434-2400 3

SUBJECT: Review and approve January 21, 2026 meeting minutes SUBMITTED BY: Eugenie Guadron DEPARTMENT: Community Development DATE: February 18, 2026 Item Number 8.A ATTACHMENTS: 8.A. Draft Meeting Minutes 01.21.2026.pdf STAFF REPORT 4

MINUTES - DRAFT CITY OF LINCOLN PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting January 21, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER –Chairman Gilbert called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL – Commissioners present: Gilbert, Hutchinson, Jackson, E.Johnson, J.Johnson, Manning. Various Staff and Public were also in attendance in person and via Zoom. Commissioner Herzog was absent. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – was led by Chairman Peter Gilbert. 4. AGENDA MODIFICATION – None. 5. ROTATION OF CHAIRPERSON AND ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRPERSON Per Chairman Gilbert’s nomination request, Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Hutchinson, seconded by Commissioner Manning) for Vice Chairman Eric Johnson to rotate into the roll as Planning Commission Chairman. Unanimously Approved by voice call with no opposition (6-0-0- 1). Chairman Gilbert recognized any nomination of the Planning Commission Vice Chairperson. Commissioner J.Johnson nominated Commissioner Manning, seconded by Chair E.Johnson. There were no further nominations. Unanimously Approved that Commissioner Manning is Planning Commission Vice Chair by voice call with no opposition (6-0-0-1). The gavel was passed to Chair Eric Johnson. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION – None. 7. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF – None. 8. DISCLOSURE OF EXPARTE COMMUNICATION – None. 9. CONSENT – 9.A Review and approve September 17, 2025 meeting minutes 9.B Review and approve December 17, 2025 meeting minutes Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Gilbert, seconded by Commission Hutchinson) to approve the September 17, 2025 and December 17, 2025 meeting minutes. Unanimously Approved by voice call vote with no opposition (6-0-0-1). 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS – 10.A Canine and Feline Kennel Uses Ordinance – Amendments Planning Commission to adopt a Resolution recommending City Council repeal Lincoln Municipal Code Chapter 6.28, and amend Lincoln Municipal Code Sections 6.24.010, 6.24.060.18.22.020, 18.22.030, 18.26.010, 18.26.020 and 18.26.030, and find the proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, gave a staff report to the Commission. The Commission discussed it with Attorney Mollenkopf responding to questions and comments. 5

PC 01/21/26 Minutes - DRAFT Chair E.Johnson opened and closed the public hearing at 6:18 P.M. with no public comment. Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Gilbert, seconded by Commissioner Hutchinson) to adopt a Resolution recommending City Council repeal Lincoln Municipal Code Chapter 6.28, and amend Lincoln Municipal Code Sections 6.24.010, 6.24.060.18.22.020, 18.22.030, 18.26.010, 18.26.020 and 18.26.030, and find the proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Approved by the following roll call vote: Gilbert - Aye, Hutchinson – Aye, Jackson – Aye, J.Johnson – Aye, Manning – Aye, and E.Johnson – Aye (6-0-0-1) 11. GENERAL BUSINESS – 11.A Ad Hoc Theme and Naming Committee Approval to appoint public member Ronee Briley to the committee Rommel Pabalinas, Planning Manager, presented the staff report nominating Roney Briley to the Ad Hoc Theme and Naming Committee (TANC). Chair E.Johnson opened and closed for public comment at 6:22 P.M. with no public comment. The Commission further discussed with Manager Pabalinas responding to questions and comments. Commissioner Hutchinson stated Ms. Briley and her have been on the Design Review Board for many years supports the nomination of Ms. Briley to the TANC. Motioned (Offered by Commissioner Gilbert, seconded by Vice Chair Manning) to appoint Ronee Briley to the Ad Hoc Theme and Naming Committee. Unanimously Approved by voice call vote with no opposition (6-0-0-1). 11.B Planning Commission 2026 Meeting Schedule Manager Pabalinas presented the Planning Commission 2026 meeting schedule, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. Attorney Mollenkopf mentioned this is an informational item. 12. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORTS Nita Wracker, Interim Community Development Director reported on the following:  Planning Project Tracker, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. 13. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS – Vice Chair Manning congratulated Chair E.Johnson on being Chair this year and thanked former Chairman Gilbert on his service for the past year. Chair E.Johnson congratulated Vice Chair Manning on his appointment on being Vice Chair this year. 14. ADJOURNMENT – Chairman E.Johnson adjourned the meeting at 6:41 P.M. Submitted by: Eugenie Guadron, Planning Commission Secretary 6

11.B. PC 2026 Schedule 7

City of Lincoln Planning Commission 2026 SCHEDULE (3rd Wednesday 6:00PM) January 21, 2026 February 18, 2026 March 18, 2026 April 15, 2026 May 20, 2026 June 17, 2026 July 15, 2026 August 19, 2026 September 16, 2026 October 21, 2026 November 18, 2026 December 16, 2026 January 20, 2027 8

12.A. Planning Project Tracker 9

PROJECT PERMIT TYPES PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION PROJECT STATUS Gatherings at the Grove (formerly known as Stardust) - Production Homes Review Specific Development Plan/Design Review Development of 302 active adult residential lots. The age-restricted community consists of nine single-family detached floor plans ranging from 1,457 to 2,536 square feet. This project is part of the Village 1 Specific Plan Area. South of McBean Park Drive and West of Stardust Lane (APN: 021-274-040-000) DRB tentatively scheduled for 1/28/26 Leavell North Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Parcel Map to split 103.18 acres (APNs: 021-274-036, 021-274-065) into four separate parcels. South of McBean Park Drive and North of future Oak Tree Lane (APNs: 021-274-036 & -065) Tentative City Council: February 24th Stardust 12 Tentative Subdivision Map/Specific Plan Amendment/Development Agreement Application for a Tentative Subdivision Map, Specific Plan Amendment, and Development Agreement for the residential development of approximately 13 acres. The proposed project includes rezoning the project site to VMDR to create 86 single- family residential lots. Southwest corner of McBean Park Drive and Stardust Lane (APN: 021-274-038 & -039) Waiting for resubmittal from applicant The Waterfront Development Agreement Proposed Mixed Use Development consisting of 271 residential apartment units and 50,000 square feet of commercial within Village 1 Specific Plan. Southeast corner of McBean Park Drive and Oak Tree Lane (APN: 021-274-033-000) Waiting for resubmittal from applicant Turkey Creek Golf Course Driving Range Netting Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment to the Turkey Creek Golf Course's Conditional Use Permit for the proposed construction of a maximum 100-foot netting along Driving Range portion of Turkey Creek Golf Course. Oak Tree Lane north of McBean Park Drive on Turkey Creek Golf Course (APN 021-272-009- 000) Under departmental review PROJECT PERMIT TYPES PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION PROJECT STATUS Brar Pre-Annexation Proceedings Pre-Annexation Proceedings Request Pre-Annexation approval for filing of an application to Placer County LAFCO for annexation of approximately 116-acre property within the Village 5 Specific Plan. 2660 Moore Road; APN 021-263-016-000 Application deemed complete; pending departmental review Windsor Cove General Development Plan Amendment/Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map/Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map/Development Agreement Proposed Large Lot and Small-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map creating a total 172 residential lots, recreational and open space lots Northeast corner of Moore Road & Fiddyment Road (APN: 021-490-002-000) Under departmental review PROJECT PERMIT TYPES PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION PROJECT STATUS Liberty at Lincoln Village 1 - Production Homes Review (TOM) Design Review Modification Production home review for (79) 50'x105' lots, 4 floor plans with 3 elevations per plan. Plans range from 2,173 sf to 3,631 sf. Elevations feature a Spanish, Farmhouse and Craftsman style. East of Liberty Parkway and north of Honor Lane (APN: 327-380-009-000) DRB tentatively scheduled for 1/28/26 Liberty at Lincoln Village 2 - Production Homes Review (TOM) Design Review Modification Production home review for (70) 50'x95' lots, 3 floor plans with 3 elevations per plan. Plans range from 2,458 sf to 2,785 sf. Elevations feature a Spanish, Farmhouse and Craftsman style. East of Liberty Parkway and south of Honor Lane (APN: 327-380-008-000) DRB tentatively scheduled for 1/28/26 Liberty at Lincoln - Village 8 Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to create 106 50'x55' single family residential lots within the Village 7 Specific Plan area. Southeast corner of Ferrari Ranch Road and future Western Blvd (APN: 327-380-002-000) Waiting for resubmittal from applicant PLANNING PROJECT TRACKER (as of 1/12) VILLAGE 1 VILLAGE 5 VILLAGE 7 10

PLANNING PROJECT TRACKER (as of 1/12) Liberty at Lincoln - Village 9 Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to create 48 50'x95' single family residential lots and a 9.5-acre community park site. West of future Western Blvd extension (APN: 021- 283-044-000) Waiting for resubmittal from applicant Village 7B Amendments Specific Plan Amendment/General Development Plan Amendment Amendments to Specific Plan and General Development to modify the land use plan for annexed land within Village 7, as well as unannexed land within Village 7 and Village 5. Northwest corner of Moore Road & Sorrento Parkway (multiple APNs) Under departmental review Village 7B Annexation Annexation Request Pre-Annexation approval for filing of an application to Placer County LAFCO for annexation of approximately 180 acres of property within the northern portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan (~146 acres) and a portion within the Village 5 Specific Plan (~34 acres). Northwest corner of Moore Road & Sorrento Parkway (multiple APNs) Under departmental review PROJECT PERMIT TYPES PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION PROJECT STATUS Chevron CUP Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Proposed sale and/or consumption of alcoholic beverage in accordance with LMC Section 18.22.030. (21) and Public Convenience of Necessity Letter (PCN) LMC Section 18.60 (Alcohol Sales) 151 East Joiner Parkway Application deemed complete; pending departmental review Freedom Rentals CUP Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Revocation of existing CUP (PLN24-00014) for car rental and replacement of a new CUP for rental of a maximum six moving trucks 561 7th Street ; APN 008-161-007-000 Application deemed complete; pending departmental review JLC Ready Mix Design Review Project proposes to build a two story office building with concrete plant observation room. 1360 Gladding Road Waiting for resubmittal from applicant Lincoln Skyways Hangar Design Review Permit Proposed construction and operation of a new 100 foot x 135 foot steel building aircraft hangar within the Lincoln Regional Airport. No situs address; APN: 021-590-016-000 Application deemed complete; under departmental review Lincoln 14 Rezone/General Plan Amendment/General Development Plan Amendment/Tentative Subdivision Map The project proposal includes a Rezone, General Plan Amendment, and GDP amendment to rezone commercial and business-professional uses to residential and open space uses. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map will create 55 single-family residential lots. Southwest corner of Nicolaus Road & Joiner Parkway (APN: 021-310-017, -032, and -100) Project on hold Lincoln 270 Rezone/General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Amendment/General Development Plan Amendment/Design Guidelines Amendment/Development Agreement Amendment/Large Lot Tentative Map Modification Proposed amendments to the adopted Lincoln Village 270 Specific Plan, General Development Plan, and Design Guidelines to rezone some commercial and business- professional uses to residential and park uses. A Development Agreement Amendment and Large Lot Tentative Map Amendment will be required due to the proposed rezone. Located between Highway 65 and Industrial Avenue (multiple APNs) Project on hold OTHER AREAS 11

PLANNING PROJECT TRACKER (as of 1/12) Lincoln Gateway Residential General Development Plan Amendment/Rezone/Tentative Subdivision Map Proposed amendment to the General Development Plan, Rezone 1.5 acres from Business Professional to Medium Density Residential RD 12.9. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map would divide the property into 16 lots. Southwest corner of 1st Street and E Street (APN: 008-280-032-000) Under departmental review Prairie Point Telecommunications Facility Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP to build a 60-foot mono-broadleaf cell communications tower within a 3,600SF lease area and associated improvements located on an open space parcel near Twelve Bridges Elementary School. Located Southwest of Twelve Bridges Elementary School (APN: 334-010-013-000) Application deemed complete; under departmental review Starbucks/Circle K at 1st St and Joiner Parkway Tentative Subdivision Map/Conditional Use Permit The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map would divide the existing 2 acre property into two 1 acre lots. The drive-thru for the Starbucks will require a Conditional Use Permit and the convenience store for the Circle K will require a Conditional Use Permit for alcohol sales. Southeast corner of 1st Street and Joiner Parkway (APN: 021-321-089-000) DRB recommended approval on 11/20/25, future PC date pending Walmart Remodel Design Review Modification Design Review modification to make exterior modifications to existing Walmart Neighborhood Market. The project scope includes changes to exterior paint colors and signage, and re-striping the parking lot. 255 Lincoln Boulevard DRB tentatively scheduled for 1/28/26 West Lincoln Square Specific Development Plan/Design Review/CUP/Tentative Parcel Map Project proposes to split an existing 40 acre vacant commercial lot into 21 separate lots (15 commercial, 6 infrastructure). The shopping center would consist of approximately 244,000 sf of retail, dining, automotive and medical offices with a large retail anchor. Northeast corner of Highway 65 and Nelson Lane (APN: 021-262-044-000) Major retail anchor DRB tentatively scheduled for 1/28/26, rest of development recommended approval by DRB in November 2025 12

SUBJECT: The Grove - Production Homes Design Review (within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area) SUBMITTED BY: Tom Cruickshank DEPARTMENT: Community Development DATE: February 18, 2026 Item Number 8.B STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission consider information contained in the staff report and take the following actions: 1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15183, determine that the 2012 Village 1 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as supplemented in the 2023 Village 1 Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse (SCH) #2010102018) satisfies the requirements of CEQA given that no new, or substantially more severe, impacts would result from the project and that the prior analysis contained in the certified Village 1 Specific Plan Final EIR adequately addresses environmental impacts. 2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Specific Development Plan/Development Permit (Design Review) application for Beazer Homes for the design and construction of 302 single- family residential units, subject to the findings and conditions of approval included as Exhibit A of the Resolution (Attachment 1). BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: The Grove by Beazer Homes (project) is a Specific Development Plan/Development Permit (Design Review) application (PLN25-00005) located within a Village Low Density Residential designated area of the Village 1 Specific Plan (Specific Plan) and General Development Plan (GDP), which were adopted by the City of Lincoln City Council in June 2013 (Attachment 6). The adopted plan provides direction for development of 1,832 acres of land within the City of Lincoln (City). Approximately 120 acres are located outside of the City limits, but within the City’s Sphere of Influence. Approved in 2024, the Stardust subdivision, now known as the Grove, is located east of Ingram Sough and north of the Sun City Lincoln Hills Plan area (Attachment 2). The subdivision integrates residential uses, open space and a park for the community. The development consists of 302 detached single-family homes, with a neighborhood park and STAFF REPORT 13

open space with trail system. As a gated community, the Grove will have private streets and sidewalks and public trails, sewer and water facilities. The project is specifically located south of McBean Park Drive, on Assessor’s Parcel Number: 021-274-040-000, bordered on the east by Stardust Lane, and surrounded on the north, west and south by vacant properties. The project will be developed on both the east and west sides of the Oak Tree Lane extension. Consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan and GDP, the subdivision is a permitted use for VLDR zoned parcels. Project Description The proposed Grove project by Beazer Homes involves the construction of 302 single-family homes. The single and two-story homes will range in size from 1,567 square feet (SF) to 3,325 SF and will be located on lots varying in size (Attachment 3). Each floor plan has three elevations with a minimum of three separate color/material schemes (twenty-one total color schemes and material variety combinations), which include Americana, Bungalow, Farmhouse, Transitional Craftsman, and Ranch (Attachment 3 & 4). Details regarding the homes are included b

Showing the first 24,000 of 61,208 characters. The full document is at the source.

COUNCIL: ALL RIGHT, SAYING IT'S 6 O'CLOCK, I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. CALL THE… SORRY, FEBRUARY 18TH, 2026, CITY OF LINCOLN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER GILBERT? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JACKSON? HERE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? COUNCIL: AND CHAIR ERIC JOHNSON. HERE. COUNCIL: DO WE NEED TO MAKE IT KNOWN, COMMISSIONER MANNING. COUNCIL: WAS IT… ISN'T PRESENT, OR… I KNOW THAT AT THE LAST MEETING, HE DID MENTION ABOUT, BEING… COUNCIL: THERE'S KEY WEEK, WHERE SCHOOL BEING OUT, COUNCIL: I DID NOT GET OFFICIAL THROUGH EMAIL, BUT THERE WAS VERBAL FROM LAST MEETING. OKAY. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: ITEM NUMBER 3, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. WE'LL HAVE COMMISSIONER HERZOG WILL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE TONIGHT, PLEASE. COUNCIL: I LOVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. COUNCIL: PUBLIC FOR WHOM YOU STAND. COUNCIL: COGNITION. COUNCIL: GOODBYE. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: ITEM NUMBER 4, AGENDA MODIFICATIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY AGENDA MODIFICATIONS THIS EVENING? COUNCIL: I AM SEEING NONE. COUNCIL: SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO NUMBER 5, PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. COUNCIL: WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMITTEE, SORRY, THE COMMISSION. COUNCIL: CITIZENS MAY ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA WHEN THE ITEM IS CONSIDERED. CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK MAY REQUEST TO SPEAK BY RAISING YOUR HAND WHEN REQUESTED TO DO SO. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES. COUNCIL: SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT TO PUBLIC COMMENT. SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE, OR ANYONE IN CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? COUNCIL: I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED IN THE ROOM, AND I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY CARDS. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: SO WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT, AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 6, INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM THE STAFF. COUNCIL: DOES THE STAFF HAVE ANY INFORMATIONAL ITEMS? COUNCIL: THANK YOU. WE DO JUST HAVE ONE INFORMATIONAL ITEM. SO, DURING THE UPLOAD OF THE AGENDA, WE ENCOUNTERED SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH OUR SOFTWARE, AND SO YOU MAY NOTICE, DEPENDING ON WHICH LINK YOU CLICK TO ACCESS THE AGENDA, THAT THERE IS A TYPO IN ONE LINK THAT WE WEREN'T ABLE TO CORRECT, BUT IT IS COUNCIL: CORRECT WITHIN THE AGENDA PACKET AND WITHIN THE PRESENT… THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE THIS EVENING. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 7, DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. SO THIS OPPORTUNITY, IF ANY OF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY COMMUNICATION TO DISCLOSE, WE'LL START TO MY RIGHT. COUNCIL: GOODMAIL. COUNCIL: A NONE FOR ME. NONE. COUNCIL: NONE? NONE. AND I ALSO HAVE NONE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: SO NOW WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 8, CONSENT. MR. CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO REQUEST THAT ITEMS 8 COUNCIL: B AND 8C. COUNCIL: BE REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION. COUNCIL: AND I WOULD, MOVE APPROVAL OF, THE REMAINING ITEM, 8A. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: PERFECT. SO WE HAVE, 8B AND 8C REMOVED WITH A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REMAINING. I'LL SECOND. OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. COUNCIL: WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO A VOICE CALL? YES, VOICE CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL: ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. COUNCIL: ANY OPPOSED? COUNCIL: AND ABSTENTIONS? COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: EXCELLENT, THANK YOU. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: SO, ITEM NUMBER 8B HAS BEEN REMOVED. COUNCIL: LET'S SEE… SO… WE'LL GO AHEAD AND… DISCUSS ITEM AB. COUNCIL: WHICH IS… THE GROVE, PRODUCTION HOMES DESIGN REVIEW, AND THAT'S WITHIN THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN. COUNCIL: AREA. COUNCIL: SO, I GUESS I'LL GO AHEAD AND… COUNCIL: TURN IT OVER TO THE STAFF. COUNCIL: MR. CHAIR, IF I COULD, I WOULD, COUNCIL: I BROUGHT THIS UP, REALLY NOT, GERMANE TO THE… COUNCIL: THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE'S, RECOMMENDATION ON THE HOUSING, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS VERY INSTRUCTIVE, TO SEE TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO COUNCIL: CIRCULATION ELEMENT FOR, BEFORE THE TWO… COUNCIL: THESE TWO HOUSING, DEVELOPMENTS ON THEIR PEDESTRIAN AND, BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLANS. COUNCIL: AND IF I COULD, IF I COULD HAVE TOM SHOW ATTACHMENT 7 OF 8B. COUNCIL: I WILL ATTEMPT TO… I'VE GOT, COUNCIL: ATTACHMENT 7 UP ON THE SCREEN HERE, IF EVERYONE CAN SEE THAT. COUNCIL: THIS SHOWS THE, THE TRAIL AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATTERN. COUNCIL: AND… IT, I FIND IT… BARELY, VERY POORLY DONE. COUNCIL: BECAUSE IT… IT DOESN'T REALLY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF COUNCIL: THE NATURAL, PHYSICAL FEATURES OF THE SITE. COUNCIL: AND… IT'S… COUNCIL: PROBABLY SERVES ITS PURPOSE IF YOU WANT TO WALK A DOG, FOR 100 FEET OR SO. BUT IF YOU'RE TRYING TO GET ON THAT TRAIL SYSTEM AND GO SOMEWHERE IN PARTICULAR. COUNCIL: IT'S DIFFICULT, AND YOU REALLY HAVE TO RESORT TO USING, STREET, STREETS TO, TO… COUNCIL: GET WHERE YOU WANT TO GO. COUNCIL: FOR EXAMPLE, FROM… FROM THAT, FROM THAT. COUNCIL: CIRCULATION PATTERN. YOU REALLY CAN'T… COUNCIL: GET TO THINGS LIKE THE COMMERCIAL CENTER, OR FUTURE COMMERCIAL CENTER, ANYWAY. SOME MAJOR PARKS ARE NOT TIED TOGETHER WITH IT. YOU CAN'T EASILY GET TO THE AUBURN TRAIL, WHICH I WOULD HOPE SOMEDAY WOULD EXTEND INTO, INTO AUBURN. COUNCIL: AND THEN… IF YOU WOULD BRING UP, ATTACHMENT, 11 OF ITEM 8C, THIS IS… COUNCIL: JUST REMARKABLY, REMARKABLY HOW WELL DONE. IT'S… COUNCIL: USING ALL OF THE PHYSICAL FEATURES, TO MAKE CONNECTIONS, AND YOU CAN GET TO, PARKS, SCHOOL SITES, COUNCIL: AND OTHER TRAILS. COUNCIL: EFFORTLESSLY. COUNCIL: AND KIND OF MY POINT IS, IF WE CAN… IF WE CAN DO IT RIGHT IN THIS INSTANCE, WHY CAN'T WE DO IT RIGHT FOR ALL INSTANCES? COUNCIL: AND, COUNCIL: YOU KNOW, MAYBE WE CAN BLAME IT ON THE GENERAL PLAN BEING NOT AS DIRECTIVE AS IT PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN. COUNCIL: BUT… I WOULD LIKE TO SEE US GET A LITTLE BIT COUNCIL: TOUGHER ON THE, ON THE DEVELOPERS, AND TRY TO GET COUNCIL: CIRCULATION ELEMENTS THAT LOOKS LIKE THIS, RATHER THAN THE FIRST ONE THAT WE SAW. COUNCIL: AND THAT WAS REALLY MY ONLY POINT OF THIS WHOLE EVENT, AND… COUNCIL: IF THERE AREN'T ANY FURTHER DISCUSSIONS, I WOULD MOVE APPROVAL OF… BOTH ITEMS. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM ANY COMMISSIONERS? COUNCIL: OKAY, WELL, I DON'T SEE ANY. THANK YOU SO… COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. COUNCIL: TO MOVE APPROVAL OF, COUNCIL: PERFECT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, COUNCIL: FOR ITEM 8B, THE GROVE PRODUCTION HOME DESIGN REVIEW WITHIN THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. COUNCIL: WHO MOTIONED? SORRY, I MISSED IT. COUNCIL: I DID. COMMISSIONER BARRY JOHNSON. JERRY, THANK YOU, AND PETER, SECOND. SINCE THIS WAS PULLED FROM CONSENT, I WOULD LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. PLEASE. THANK YOU. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? YES. COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES. COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? YES. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COUNCIL: AND CHAIR ERIC JOHNSON. YES. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, MOTION PASSES. COUNCIL: WE'LL GO ON TO ITEM C. PLEASE, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON. COUNCIL: DO YOU HAVE SOME, COMMENTS? COUNCIL: REGARDING ITEM C, THAT'S THE LIBERTY AT LINCOLN VILLAGE 1, AND LIBERTY AT LINCOLN VILLAGE 2 PRODUCTION HOME DESIGN REVIEW WITHIN THE VILLAGE 7 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. I'M SORRY, I MEANT THAT MOTION TO BE APPROVAL OF BOTH. OH, OKAY. BNC. DID HE SAY THAT? OKAY, I MISSED IT. COUNCIL: I WOULD LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE, THEN A MOTION BY JERRY… COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON, A SECOND BY PETER GILBERT FOR THIS ITEM. WONDERFUL, I WILL DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. AND THIS IS FOR BOTH RESOLUTIONS IN LIBERTY OF LINCOLN FOR VILLAGE 1 AND VILLAGE 2 DESIGN REVIEW. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON. HI. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER HERZOG? I JUST NEED A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, BECAUSE SINCE WE POLLED IT, DO WE NEED TO OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THESE, OR DO WE NOT? COUNCIL: NOT NECESSARY, UP TO CHAIRMAN, ERIC JOHNSON. THIS IS… THIS IS CHRISTINE, THE CITY ATTORNEY. I'M SORRY I'M REMOTE TONIGHT. BUT YES, IT IS UP TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR, BECAUSE IT IS A CONSENT ITEM, BUT… IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T HURT TO OPEN IT UP TO PUBLIC COMMENT. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: FOLLOWING THAT, I WILL OPEN IT TO PUBLIC COMMENT. COUNCIL: DO WE HAVE ANY… SECRETARY, HAVE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE OR IN THE AUDIENCE, PLEASE? COUNCIL: THERE ARE NO HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: THERE ARE NO HANDS RAISED IN THE ROOM. COUNCIL: OKAY, THANK YOU. SO, WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND BRING IT BACK. SO, WE HAVE A MOTION. COUNCIL: AND A SECOND, AND THAT IS FOR BOTH ITEMS 8B AND 8C. I WOULD… I WOULD ASK THAT YOU… VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY, PLEASE. COUNCIL: OKAY, SO, WE WERE TAKING A VOTE ON 8C FOR LIBBY OF LINCOLN VILLAGE 1 DESIGN REVIEW. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON? YES. COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES. COMMISSIONER HUTCHISON? YES. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. AND CHAIRMAN ERIC JOHNSON? YES. THANK YOU. POINT OF WATER, WE ALREADY VOTED ON 8B. COUNCIL: WE… WE DID, CORRECT. SO THAT… THAT IS DONE. WE'VE DONE THEM SEPARATELY, AS THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS SUGGESTED. COUNCIL: I THINK, CHRISTINE WAS SPEAKING ABOUT VILLAGE, LIBERTY OF LINCOLN 8C. WE HAVE TWO RESOLUTIONS. ONE IS FOR VILLAGE 1, AND ONE IS FOR VILLAGE 2. COUNCIL: SPLIT THOSE. OKAY. COUNCIL: YES. COUNCIL: ARE YOU OKAY? CORRECT. COUNCIL: YES. COUNCIL: ARE YOU OKAY, COMMISSIONER GILBERT, WITH YOUR VOTE ON VILLAGE 1? COUNCIL: WONDERFUL. CHAIRMAN, JOHNSON, CAN WE GET A MOTION FOR… I'LL MOTION FOR THE SECOND PART OF 8C WITH APPROVAL OF VILLAGE 2. I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. I HAVE A MOTION, A SECOND. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER HERZOG? YES. COMMISSIONER GILBERT? YES. COMMISSIONER HUTCHINSON? YES. COMMISSIONER JACKSON? YES. COMMISSIONER JERRY JOHNSON? YES. AND CHAIRMAN ERIC JOHNSON? YES. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT, MOTION PASSES. COUNCIL: I THINK WE'RE COVERED. COUNCIL: ON THAT ONE. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: SHOULD WE VOTE ON THEM AGAIN, JUST FOR FUN? WELL DONE, TEAM. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, CHRISTINE. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: SO, WITH, CONSENT ITEMS, COUNCIL: COMPLETED, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 9, PUBLIC HEARINGS. COUNCIL: AND WE WILL HAVE ITEM 9A. THIS IS THE WALMART REMODEL DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION, AND WE'LL HAVE MICHAELA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER, WITH THE STAFF THAT WILL GIVE US A REPORT TONIGHT. PLEASE, MICHAELA. COUNCIL: HERE WE GO. OKAY, PERFECT. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. MICHAELA NOBLE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. NICE SEEING YOU ALL. IT'S BEEN A FEW MONTHS SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE, SO NICE TO SEE YOU ALL. COUNCIL: THE PROJECT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS THE WALMART REMODEL PROJECT. THE PRESENTATION IS A SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT, AND MORE DETAILED INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL: JUST WANT TO ADDRESS THE MEMORANDUM THAT IS PROVIDED ON YOUR DESK. THIS WAS SENT OUT TO YOU ALL DIGITALLY ON FRIDAY. COUNCIL: THERE WERE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH OUR AGENDA DISTRIBUTION SOFTWARE, WHICH NITA MENTIONED EARLIER, THAT HAD AFFECTED THIS PROJECT, SO THE MEMO JUST KIND OF CLEARED UP THOSE TECHNICAL ERRORS THAT WE COULDN'T ADDRESS ONLINE. IT'S THE FULL AGENDA PACKET, FULLY CORRECTED. COUNCIL: SOME OF THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED ONLINE, BUT JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE THE MEMO SINCE IT WAS EMAILED TO YOU ALL ON FRIDAY. COUNCIL: THE APPLICANT, POOLEY, IS REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION FOR THE EXISTING WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET. COUNCIL: THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 255 LINCOLN BOULEVARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LINCOLN BOULEVARD AND 3RD STREET. COUNCIL: THE PROJECT SITE IS BOUND BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST. THE SOMERSET SENIOR LIVING FACILITY IS LOCATED EAST OF THE PROJECT SITE. COUNCIL: THE PROPERTY IS OWNED COMMERCIAL AND IS SUBJECT TO THE LINCOLN MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE LINCOLN DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN PLAN. COUNCIL: AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET IS AN EXISTING BUILDING AND BUSINESS. THE PROJECT IS NOT PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, AND ONLY INTENDS TO MODIFY THE EXTERIOR PAINT COLOR SCHEME, UPDATE EXISTING SIGNAGE, AND RE-STRIPE THE PARKING LOT. COUNCIL: THE SITE PLAN ILLUSTRATES UPDATES TO ADA, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT. COUNCIL: PARKING STALL STRIPING TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT BUILDING CODES. ADDITIONALLY, 14 PARKING STALLS ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARK PROJECT SITE ARE PROPOSED TO BE DESIGNATED AS PICKUP STALLS. COUNCIL: SO THE PARKING STALLS FOR PICKUP ARE LOCATED IN THIS AREA. COUNCIL: THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO UPDATE THE CURRENT WARM, EARTHY PAINT SCHEME OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND UTILIZE SHADES OF GRAY, BLACK, WHITE, AND BLUE TO CORRESPOND WITH WALMART'S UPDATED BRANDING. WALL SIGNS WOULD BE REPLACED AND UPDATED. COUNCIL: NO MODIFICATIONS TO THE FREESTANDING SIGN STRUCTURE ARE BEING PROPOSED, HOWEVER, THE SIGN FACE IS BEING UPDATED TO REFLECT COUNCIL: WALMART'S NEW BRANDING STYLE. COUNCIL: WHICH, JUST TO REITERATE, THIS IS THE AREA THAT'S CHANGING, JUST KIND OF THE SIGN, FACE, AND COPY. THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE ITSELF IS NOT BEING MODIFIED. COUNCIL: STAFF ANALYZED THE PROPOSED ENTITLEMENT REQUEST AND CONCLUDED THAT IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, POLICY, AND INTENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN, LINCOLN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLES 16 AND 18, AND THE LINCOLN DOWNTOWN URBAN DESIGN PLAN. COUNCIL: THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REVIEWED THE PROJECT IN JANUARY AND DID NOT PROVIDE ANY MODIFICATION REQUESTS FOR THE PROJECT. COUNCIL: THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. COUNCIL: CITY STAFF HAS PREPARED DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO ENSURE ORDERLY AND TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT. COUNCIL: STANDARD AND PROJECT-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN APPLIED. THESE WILL ALL BE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY CITY DEPARTMENTS, AND THE APPLICANT HAS REVIEWED AND AGREED TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. COUNCIL: STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINE THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, UNDER SECTION 15301, EXISTING FACILITIES, AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION FOR THE WALMART REMODEL PROJECT. COUNCIL: AT THIS TIME, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY FORMAL PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, AND ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE APPLICANT TEAM ONLINE ON ZOOM WHO ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, MICHAELA. COUNCIL: BEFORE I OPEN IT TO PUBLIC HEARINGS, I'LL ASK MY COLLEAGUES IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BEFORE WE OPEN IT. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, PLEASE. COUNCIL: MAY FALL UNDER THE WHITE HOUSE. COUNCIL: WISE-ASS COMMENT, BUT… COUNCIL: BLUE, BLACK, GRAY, AND WHITE ARE THE FOUR… THE ONLY FOUR COLORS ONE SEES IN ANTARCTICA OR THE ARCTIC. COUNCIL: AND WHILE I DON'T… PINK. COUNCIL: THAT'S PARTICULARLY RELEVANT. I DON'T… I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS IS… COUNCIL: YOU KNOW, I TEND TO THINK THAT THE TANS ARE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR OUR LOCAL AREA, BUT… COUNCIL: I REALLY FIND IT KIND OF ATTRACTIVE, THE WAY IT'S BEEN PRESENTED, AND COUNCIL: FIGHTING A NATIONAL BRAND IS PROBABLY NOT, PRACTICAL. COUNCIL: ALRIGHT. COUNCIL: THAT'S A… THANKS FOR THE OBSERVATION. COUNCIL: YEAH, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOR OPENING UP TO PUBLIC HEARING? COUNCIL: ALL RIGHT, WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM MAY REQUEST TO SPEAK BY RAISING THEIR HAND. WHEN REQUESTED TO DO SO, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES. SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE, OR ANYONE IN THE CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? COUNCIL: I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED ONLINE. COUNCIL: AND I DO NOT SEE ANY HANDS RAISED HERE IN THE ROOM. COUNCIL: OKAY. COUNCIL: WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE… THIS PUBLIC HEARING FOR THAT ITEM. COUNCIL: AND… LET'S SEE, SO I'LL BRING IT BACK TO MY COLLEAGUES. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? COUNCIL: I'LL START. COUNCIL: ON THIS END, ANY… PLEASE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. FIRST OF ALL, HAVING SPENT… COUNCIL: A GOOD PART OF MY CAREER FOR A VERY MAJOR COUNCIL: AMERICAN CORPORATION, I WANT IT TO BE KNOWN THAT THEY SPEND… COUNCIL: VAST SUMS OF MONEY ON SIGNAGE. COUNCIL: WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, WHAT COLOR IT'S GOING TO BE, ETC. COUNCIL: IF YOU'RE A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION, AND YOU ADOPT COUNCIL: A COLOR SCHEME OR A SIGN PROGRAM. COUNCIL: IT'S CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO JUSTIFY YOUR INVESTMENT. COUNCIL: THAT YOU BE CONSISTENT ALL THE WAY THROUGH. THAT IS PROBABLY THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF ANY SIGNAGE PROGRAM, IS TO BE CONSISTENT, BECAUSE IT'S… THEY WANT PEOPLE TO RECOGNIZE IT. HOWEVER, I ASKED FOR THE FLOOR FOR ANOTHER REASON. COUNCIL: AND, I HAD ORIGINALLY BROUGHT TO THE STAFF'S ATTENTION THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE NUMBERS, AND WE FOUND OUT IT WAS WITH THE SOFTWARE, AND WE DO HAVE THE CORRECT NUMBERS. AND WITH MY BACKGROUND. COUNCIL: IN FINANCE, I ALWAYS MAKE SURE THAT THINGS ADD UP, AND THEY DIDN'T, BUT THEY DO NOW, SO THANK YOU, THANK YOU TO STAFF. COUNCIL: HOWEVER, I'M GOING TO SHARE WITH YOU ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, I'M HANDICAPPED. COUNCIL: AND I DO SHOP AT THIS WALMART. THEY CARRY A COUPLE PRODUCTS. COUNCIL: THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO TRAVEL COUNCIL: MAYBE 15, 20 MILES AWAY, SO THEY BECOME ONE OF MY PLACES. MY WIFE SHOPS IN 3 OR 4 DIFFERENT SUPERMARKETS. SHE'S FUSSY WHAT SHE BUYS, BUT THERE'S A COUPLE THINGS THAT I WANT TO BUY LOCALLY… COUNCIL: WALMART'S THE PLACE FOR ME. COUNCIL: QUITE OFTEN, WHEN I GO TO WALMART. COUNCIL: I CAN'T FIND A PARKING PLACE. COUNCIL: AND OF COURSE, BEING RETIRED, I DON'T GO THE SAME TIME EVERY TIME. I GO WHEN I WANT. SO I'VE TRIED TO FIND THE TIME DURING THE DAY COUNCIL: WHERE THERE'S PARKING PLACES AVAILABLE. COUNCIL: AND IT'S DIFFICULT, AND OF COURSE, THERE'S A LIMITED NUMBER OF HANDICAPPED PLACES, AND I ASSUME THAT THE NUMBER THEY HAVE MEETS OUR CRITERIA FOR THE CITY. COUNCIL: NOW, WHAT I SEE HERE IS… COUNCIL: I'VE BEEN HAVING A PROBLEM, AND NOT ONLY DO I ALSO WANT TO COMMENT, NOT ONLY DO I HAVE A PROBLEM PARKING IN THE PARKING LOT. COUNCIL: MOST OF THE TIME, I HAVE TROUBLE PARKING ON THE PERIMETER OF THE SHOPPING CENTER ON THE STREET. COUNCIL: I HAVE THAT PROBLEM. COUNCIL: OTHER PEOPLE HAVE THAT PROBLEM. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE HANDICAPPED TO HAVE THAT PROBLEM. COUNCIL: WHICH MEANS, FROM A MARKETING STANDPOINT, YOU'RE PROBABLY LOSING BUSINESS. COUNCIL: AND SO THEY HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM HERE, AND THEY HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM BECAUSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED HERE FOR A WHILE KNOW THIS WAS ANOTHER COUNCIL: KIND OF NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET. COUNCIL: IT CLOSED UP. COUNCIL: WALMART DECIDED TO COME IN. I WAS ON THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE TIME. IT WAS WONDERFUL TO CUT THE RIBBON AND COUNCIL: WELCOMED THEM TO THE COMMUNITY, AND THEY'VE BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL. COUNCIL: THEY PROBABLY GENERATED A LOT MORE SALES TAX REVENUE FOR US. COUNCIL: WHEN I LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, HOWEVER. COUNCIL: IT SAYS TO ME THAT FOR THE TYPICAL CUSTOMER, THE TYPICAL CUSTOMER THAT'S GOING TO GO INTO THE MARKET AND SHOP COUNCIL: AND SELECT THINGS, RATHER THAN COUNCIL: SHOPPING ELECTRONICALLY, WHICH I DO QUITE OFTEN MYSELF AND OTHER PLACES, THERE'S LESS PARKING PLACES. COUNCIL: AND SO WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR TONIGHT COUNCIL: IS TO MAKE IT MORE CONVENIENT FOR PEOPLE WHO PRE-ORDER AND WANT TO GO INTO THE PICKUP AREA. THEY'RE GOING TO EXTEND THAT. COUNCIL: BUT SOMETHING HAS TO MATCH UP ON THE NUMBERS, AND THEY'RE TAKING AWAY ADDITIONAL PARKING PLACES FOR THE PEOPLE COUNCIL: NEED OR WANT TO GO INTO THE STORE TO BUY. COUNCIL: AND THAT BOTHERS ME. I DON'T… I'VE TRIED VERY DILIGENTLY TO FIGURE OUT SOME SUGGESTION TO THAT. COUNCIL: AND IF IT COMES TO IT, I WILL VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS. COUNCIL: BUT… I THINK WE PROBABLY ARE JUST MAKING ONE PROBLEM, GO DOWN SOMEWHAT. COUNCIL: AND WE'RE CREATING MAYBE A BIGGER PROBLEM COUNCIL: FOR THE PEOPLE WHO SHOP IN THE STORE. COUNCIL: THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING MY COMMENTS. COUNCIL: YES, THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS ON THAT. COUNCIL: I GUESS WE'LL… MAYBE WE'LL GET SOME COMMENTS, AND THEN WE'LL SEE IF THE APPLICANT HAS, ANY… ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO SAY. COUNCIL: IN RESPONSE, DO YOU HAVE ANY… HERZOG? YEAH, THANK YOU. I, I, COUNCIL: YOU KNOW, I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THIS PARKING LOT, IT'S VERY CHALLENGING. I STRUGGLE TO SEE HOW YOU CAN FIT MORE SPOTS. COUNCIL: THEY'RE GONNA HAVE THE SAME NUMBER OF SPOTS TOTAL. COUNCIL: I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I, TOO, THOUGHT OF THAT, PETER, THAT, THAT, COUNCIL: THAT THEY'RE REDUCING THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS THAT WANT TO GO IN. COUNCIL: I WONDER… I WAS… COUNCIL: HOPING TO HEAR MORE ABOUT MAYBE SOME RESEARCH OR DATA ON THE INCREASE IN PEOPLE THAT JUST WANT TO PICK UP. COUNCIL: FROM THE PARKING LOT. COUNCIL: AND… AND SO, MAYBE THERE IS SOME MORE DATA AROUND THAT. I THINK THAT COULD HELP COUNCIL: LET'S MAKE A DECISION TONIGHT. COUNCIL: BUT, BUT YEAH, THIS PARKING LOT IS CHALLENGING, TO GET IN AND OUT OF, TO WALK AROUND, THOSE ONE LANES. COUNCIL: I THINK THE ANGLED SLOTS, YOU FIT MORE CARS, AND THEY ARE ALREADY ANGLED. COUNCIL: SO… I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE SPOTS, IS KIND OF MY POINT, SO… COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, DO YOU MIND IF I CUT IN? SURE. SO, TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE PARKING, LIKE I MENTIONED, THE PROJECT IS NOT EXPANDING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, AND OUR CODE FOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS OR ADDING ADDITIONAL SPOTS IS ONLY APPLICABLE IF THEY'RE EXPANDING OR ADDING ON TO THE BUILDING. COUNCIL: SO, WE DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE MORE SPACES. THE PROJECT, THE RAINBOW MARKET IS WHAT IT WAS PREVIOUSLY CALLED BACK IN THE DAY. THERE HAS BEEN SOME EXPANSIONS, AND, YOU KNOW, THAT CHANGED THE PARKING REQUIREMENT, BUT COUNCIL: AS IT WAS APPROVED WITH THAT CURRENT SQUARE FOOTAGE, IT WAS ROUGHLY ABOUT 50 STALLS UNDER-PARKED, BUT IT WAS APPROVED THAT WAY WITH PREVIOUS ENTITLEMENTS. SO WE… WITH THE REQUEST TODAY, WE CAN'T BUMP THAT NUMBER UP OR ENFORCE OUR… COUNCIL: PARKING REQUIREMENTS. GRANTED, WE WOULDN'T EVEN BE ABLE TO GET ANYWHERE NEAR 50 MORE SPACES IN ORDER TO MEET THAT MINIMUM. ADDITIONALLY, THAT WAS ONE OF MY COMMENTS AS WELL, TOO, PETER, WAS I'VE… I DON'T LIVE IN LINCOLN, BUT I DRIVE PAST IT ALL THE TIME IN ORDER TO GET HERE, AND THAT PARKING LOT'S ALWAYS FULL. COUNCIL: AND THEY DO HAVE A TRAFFIC ENGINEER ONLINE, FROM KIMLEY HORNE, AND WHAT THEY PROVIDED WITH ME WAS, ESSENTIALLY, THE GOAL IS FOR MORE PEOPLE TO UTILIZE THE PICKUP STALLS TO WHERE THAT WOULD DECREASE THE NEED FOR THE ORDINARY CONSUMER TO COME IN. COUNCIL: I'M NOT A TRAFFIC ENGINEER MYSELF, SO I DO HAVE TO DEFER TO THE EXPERTS ON THAT, WHICH WOULD BE THE KIMLEY HORN REPRESENTATIVE. COUNCIL: AND ONCE YOU GUYS PROVIDE YOUR COMMENTS, WE CAN GET THEM ONLINE, TO PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL COLOR. COUNCIL: OKAY. THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY COMMENT AS WELL, IS THAT WE WOULD SEE THAT THERE WOULD BE COUNCIL: EXCUSE ME, MORE PEOPLE PICKING THINGS UP. I THINK THAT AS WE LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT STORES IN TODAY'S WORLD, WE'RE LOOKING AT ONLINE SHOPPING, WE'RE LOOKING AT PICKUP SHOPPING MORE AND MORE IN THE GROCERY STORE AREA. DO I LIKE IT? NO, I DRIVE A LARGE CAR, AND IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO PARK THERE AND NOT COUNCIL: PARK IN A SPOT WHERE I'M NOT GOING TO GET, DINGED OR WHATEVER. HOWEVER, I ALSO CAN APPRECIATE WHERE, YOU KNOW, WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM, AND I UNDERSTAND PETER'S CONCERN AS WELL, ESPECIALLY IN TODAY'S WORLD OF A REAL STRONG EMPHASIS ON ADA. COUNCIL: IT'S BECOMING MORE AND MORE OF A, OF A FACTOR FOR US TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT. SO, THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. I THINK WE'LL SEE MORE OF THE PICKUP. COUNCIL: AND MORE ONLINE, AND… OVER THE… OVER THE… COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COUNCIL: I'LL GO TO MY LEFT. ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OVER HERE? YEAH, I JUST WANTED A CLARIFICATION. HOW MANY PICKUP SPOTS ARE THERE RIGHT NOW? SIX. COUNCIL: AND WE'RE EXPANDING IT TO? 20. COUNCIL: SEEMS A LOT. COUNCIL: I MEAN, I THINK WE SHOULD TAKE BACK AND FIND OUT COUNCIL: HOW THEY CAME UP WITH 20, I THINK WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THAT. COUNCIL: BUT 6 TO 20, THAT SEEMS TO BE OBSESSIVE. COUNCIL: AND SO I THINK WE SHOULD, DEFINITELY CHALLENGE THAT. COUNCIL: THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL ITEMS? NO. OKAY. I AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS THAT I MADE. OKAY. COUNCIL: P

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
BudgetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Planning Commission Regular Meeting — Minutes
  • Planning Commission Regular Meeting
  • Planning Commission Regular Meeting — Packet
  • Planning Commission Regular Meeting — Closed Captions

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: 4938cd9b25989e82a3140daae0911a72. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record