School Facilities Oversight Committee - 3-4-2026

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT School Facilities Oversight Committee MEASURE ABC BOND Committed to providing clean, safe and accessible campuses for our students, staff and community. NOTICE OF MEETING Date: March 4, 2026 Time: 5:00 p.m. Location: District Office Board Room 1900 West Olive Avenue Burbank, California 91506 The agenda packet is available for review online at www.burbankusd.org and at the District Service Center Building, Facilities Services, 510 South Shelton Street Burbank, 91506 Any individual with a disability who requires reasonable accommodation to participate in a School Facilities Oversight Committee meeting may request assistance by contacting the Facilities Office at 818.729.5502.

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE March 4, 2026 A G E N D A 1. CALL TO ORDER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the District is providing alternatives to in-person attendance for viewing and participating for this meeting. Any individual or group representative may address the Committee (in-person only) on any agenda item or subject within its jurisdiction. An individual or group representative may address the SFOC Committee on any agenda item by completing a white request card. Speakers are requested to state their name prior to speaking to the committee. No more than five (5) minutes may be allotted to each speaker, except by unanimous consent of the committee. The meeting will be streamed by visiting: https://www.burbankusd.org/district-info/board-of-education/board-of-education- and-governance-committee-meetings-agendas-and-videos The approved minutes of the meeting will be posted online at www.burbankusd.org. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF February 4, 2026 EXHIBIT A 3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE 4. DISCUSSION OF SFOC MEETING CALENDAR/TIMES 5. FORMATION OF BYLAWS REVIEW COMMITTEE 6. SFOC FACILITIES UPDATE • FACILITIES PROJECT STATUS UPDATE EXHIBIT B • STATUS OF PREVIOUS QUESTIONS (ROOF LEAKS) • DISCUSSION OF PROJECT MANAGER - RFQ DRAFT EXHIBIT C 7. REVIEW OF BUDGET STATUS • EXPENDITURE / CFS REPORT EXHIBIT D 8. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 9. ALTERNATE COMMENTS 10. NEXT MEETING • ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: TO BE DETERMINED AT MEETING 11. ADJOURNMENT

EXHIBIT A

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure ABC SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Minutes of the Meeting Held on February 4, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Measure ABC Bond School Facilities Oversight Committee was called to order by Chairperson Kirsten Morris at 5:04 p.m. Committee Members present: Ari Altman, Kirsten Morris, Preston Joseph, Diana Simon and Jason Clark. Diana Abasta and Matt Benson was absent. Alternate Members present: Julie Grair Also present: Interim Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Dr. Jason Hasty, Sr. Administrative Assistant to Director of Facilities Crystal Cozakos, Project Manager Robin Rickman, Project Manager Malihe Shokouhi, Director of Purchasing David Gerharter, Director of Elementary Education Dr. Rebecca Harris, Director of Fiscal Services Khai Nguyen, and Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services Peter Knapik. Chairperson Ms. Morris invited Preston Joseph to lead in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF December 3, 2025 – It was moved by Jason Clark and seconded by Preston Joseph that the minutes of December 3, 2025 be approved, as written. Motion carried 6-0 with no abstentions. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF January 7, 2026 – It was moved by Jason Clark and seconded by Ari Altman that the minutes of January 7, 2026 be approved, as written. Motion carried 5-0 with no abstentions. 3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE – Joel Schlossman, community member, brought up the concern that the Measure ABC agenda was not included on the webpage with the agenda videos under the Board of Education that lists upcoming meetings. Per the Brown Act a 72 notice to the public is required. He stated as of the morning, the agenda packet was not connected to the meeting. In addition, the lobby door was not opened prior to 15 minutes and the agenda packet was provided to him physically a few minutes prior to the meeting. He voiced his concern that the committee and public wasn’t properly noticed or provided with the minutes in a timely manner. Jeff Vanderborght, community member, expressed his concerns regarding the Measure ABC Financial and Performance Audits. He noted the audit, that is to be presented to the Board for approval the following day, stated “Pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 39 and related state legislation, the Board of Education of the District established a Citizen’s Committee”. He questioned the accuracy of the report as it ended in June 30, 2025, despite the committee being established afterwards. He noted, this verbiage is the same as the Measure S audit, copied and pasted. He stated that despite being told there weren’t 24-25 expenditures for Measure ABC in the last meeting, the audit illustrates $26 million being expended, which does not include Personnel expenditures. Mr. Vanderborght questions if Measure S picked up those costs and states the committee should be aware, regardless of not being involved in Measure S expenditures. He questioned why Measure S still has $1.7 million to be expended and thanked the committee. Committee provided comments to speakers. Committee members expressed their appreciation for the input on the critique of the audit. Stated agendas are being received ahead of time for committee review but will check with District to ensure postings are being uploaded to the website timely. Ms. Cozakos clarified the agenda packets are posted on the website under the District tab, School Facilities Oversight Committee, which links to the designated facilities page with both Measure S and Measure ABC tabs that provide the current roster and terms, bond language, and by-laws. In addition, there is a separate tab that includes the agendas and minutes. When full agenda packet is sent to committee, the packet also gets posted on the website at the same time. Typically sent the Friday before the scheduled meeting to meet the 72-hour requirement for the Brown Act. Once minutes are approved, the final version gets uploaded to the site as well. SFOC Agendas have not been uploaded to the link on Granicus due to prior circumstances but District will work on linking for future meetings.EXHIBIT A

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of February 4, 2026 4. DISCUSSION OF SFOC CALENDAR/TIMES – Ms. Morris relayed there were concerns that 5:00 PM created timing issues to meet quorum for meetings. Discussion followed to move meetings to 5:30 or 6:00 PM. Committee members requested a polling from all members and District staff to get proper count. Ms. Cozakos reviewed the process of replacing members if needed: alternates are granted opportunity to be a member if within the same category as vacant position; if not, application period will open to find candidate in that category and then will need to be appointed by the Board. Dr. Hasty stated citizen’s committees typically meet quarterly and will need to be a discussion to amend the bylaws to adjust. Ms. Cozakos provided the schedule of Measure S meetings as example: November to provide summer facilities update, January for Bond Audit, and May for annual report. 5. SFOC UPDATE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION – FACILITIES UPDATE – Ms. Rickman briefed over the updated format of the presentation which includes the school sites, the contract amount, change orders, not to exceed amounts, purchase dates, and items that are in progress. Questions were asked for clarification: the Walt Disney Elementary roof work was paid out of FEMA funds and not bond; the overage amount recorded for the Emerson roofing in last meeting was a clerical error and has been corrected. Ms. Morris voiced concern of proper staff support to ensure procedures are being followed. Dr. Hasty mentioned Tarana Alam from KeyAnalytics will be providing additional support by assisting with the finance reports in future meetings. Ms. Morris also emphasized the taxpayer’s expectations when District is choosing project priorities. Expenditure report illustrates what has been done for that specific fund; FEMA money is separate from bond money. Ms. Rickman clarified that there was a Title IX claim against the District for not being CIF compliant by not having softball fields. To resolve the complaint, the District moved forward to prove if it was possible to be CIF compliant or not at each high school. It takes at least six (6) months to get projects approved through the Division of State Architect (DSA). This project, along with the majority of the other bond projects, will be large and times will be lengthy, considering the design process and the additional contracts that have to be awarded to move projects forward. Committee would like to have better understanding of priority list. Ms. Rickman clarified the goal is to ensure projects are identified further in detail but since bond is starting off, programming does not need to be done to a T at the moment; safety projects that are more impeding to the school district and standards are priority, including making sure roofs don’t leak, HVAC units are operational, etc. Small staff currently so not everything can be tackled at this time. Projects without timelines are in programming stage that includes developing the scope, walking the campuses with the school staff and architects, issuing the Request for Proposals, preparing board agenda items to be board approved. The Adult School Landscaping Improvements is for the safety concerns with the campus from flooding going into the classrooms due to the weather from the landscaping being in poor condition. Ms. Morris questioned why the Jefferson ADA project is estimated to finish in 2027; Ms. Shokouhi clarified the Jefferson ADA Project is for the whole school to be compliant, following communication from concerned parent. Normally, a project that has to go to DSA takes about 1.5-2 years to complete. Architect did job walk; received proposed; land survey needs to be done; going to the board for approval; survey will take 2 months to complete; architect will be able to start work afterwards. Edison’s TK playground equipment is also slated to be worked on to be ADA compliant. Dr. Hasty briefed on the Security Reconfiguration Access Control and noted a few things have to happen, including a phase with the technology infrastructure upgrades; scope has not been determined; would include cameras, PA systems, or additional tech devices; needs more committee work throughout the District to include stakeholder’s feedback before dates can be put down for specific projects. Discussion followed regarding the length of time and scope for Jefferson ADA project; estimated time is unlikely to be done sooner, scope is to include front ramp and the back where parents pick up; restrooms and drinking fountains are compliant; construction will be done summer 2027 as school will be vacant. Mr. Altman questioned the actuals vs. the not to exceed amounts of roofing materials and roofing installations illustrated in the expenditure report and the charts in the presentations. Ms. Cozakos clarified the Garland purchases were all expended in 24-25 fiscal year with the not to exceed numbers reflecting the actuals. With the installations, majority of the work was done in 24-25 but was carried over to 25-26; Notice of Completions have been submitted, up to date, for all roofing projects but final invoices have not been paid and processed; final numbers, matching not to exceed amounts, will not be reflected in expenditure report until completely processed for payment. 6. REVIEW OF BUDGET STATUS – Dr. Hasty reviewed the budget report that demonstrated line items of the actuals, the total expenditures based on the Purchase Orders (PO). Dr. Hasty had only been in the BUSD position a few days when the last meeting occurred and was informed erroneously of the expenditures that were spent in 24/25 school year. He noted the reports will be transformed in the upcoming meetings as he introduced Tarana Alam from KeyAnalytics . Ms. Alam reviewed a preliminary template to illustrate what the budget reports will look like going forward. KeyAnalytics works directly with the District’s financial system, currently BEST (LACOE mandated), which allows them to get data directly to upload into their proprietary software called Keystone Solutions. The financial system is 100% matched and mirrored; gives ability to provide clear and

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of February 4, 2026 concise reports with regards to who was paid, how much, and which project. Ms. Alam reviewed the template report which will include pictures, underway projects, phases, timelines, First page will show District staff members that are involved; broad summary of the bond itself; project scope description that was approved by voters; broad summary of the funds; phasing of projects; will work with project managers to get timeline of the project priorities for the current bond series over the next 2-3 years; single project overviews; actual expenditures by school campus. Dr. Hasty stated KeyAnalytics will be taken to the board at the next board meeting on February 5, 2026; previously had a staff member completed this work; will be a cost savings to the bond; KeyAnalytics was a consultant for many years for Measure S; report will also reflect other dollars such as OPSC reimbursements at the state level or RDA dollars that could be used as leverage to elongate some of the projects. KeyAnalytics contract will go to the board for approval; will be a soft cost out of the bond fund; $85,000 per year; can be all bond or split-funded since other capital facility funds will be tracked as well; services will include not only expenditure reporting but will provide CBO and Director of Facility level hands-on support services on the bond and all other capital facility funds; reports will be done quarterly; will help with continuity with any future staff turnover; it was questioned why KeyAnalytics wasn’t brought in at the start of the committee formation; Dr. Hasty explained there was a decision that was made in the previous leadership that this work would be done in-house and that a bond program manager would have been taken on by the Director of Fiscal or CBO which is not considered a best practice in most districts; will bring discussion back to committee regarding contracting with a program manager; independent auditors also look at financial reports but that report is total materials, capital facilities, etc. and is not broken down at the vendor level; District’s financial systems are antiquated and difficult to follow; analysts review every single transaction against the financial system; no manual entry manipulation. Discussion followed of the financial system used by the District and the procedure KeyAnalytics uses to generate report. Ms. Morris inquired about salaries and benefits to ensure they are directly related to the bond; Dr. Hasty clarified that KeyAnalytics is professional services, not under salaries and benefits, and will only be working on the bond. Ms. Cozakos noted that all changes to contracts have to be board approved; nothing can be paid over the budget without being approved by the board to amend the contract. 7. MEASURE ABC FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE AUDITS – Gianna Paris, Senior Auditor at CliftonLarsonAllen LPP reported that there were no findings related to the financial audit of the Measure ABC Bond Building Fund for the year ended June 30, 2025. This report is not a full representation of the District’s finances, strictly focusing on Measure ABC. Ms. Paris reviewed the Proposition 39 compliance requirements audit which stated the results of tests indicated, in all significant respects, the District has properly accounted for the expenditures of the funds held in the Measure ABC Bond Building Fund and that such expenditures were made on authorized bond projects. Ms Paris reviewed the verbiage of the SFOC committee establishment requirement pursuant to the Prop 39 and California Education Code; School District must establish and appoint members to the Independent Citizens Oversight Committee within 60 days of the date that the governing board enters the board election results into its minutes; noted resolution 19 was taken to the board with the adoption of the bylaws with the verbiage that the committee was established on January 16, 2025. However, the wording in prop 39 states the committee should be established and appointed which did not occur and is incorrectly reported in the audit; District has identified the delay in appointing as an issue; phrasing of “appointed” should be amended; audit should reflect what the District has already acknowledged The letter of the financial audit is an overview of required communication of audit standards with no significance to report; audit did not identify any material weaknesses, significant deficiencies, or any instances of non-compliance or any other matters that are required under the government auditing standards; voter approved projects and categories in the Perkins Eastman Master Plan that are allowed under the measure are being compared to the purchase orders and invoices. Victor Taraceha arrived Ms. Morris questioned if the performance audit confirmed that the use of piggyback contracts for the roofing materials and network equipment to be the best value compared to a traditional hard bid process or paperwork was just legal; Ms. Paris clarified the audit reviewed the supporting documents to confirm that it was appropriate. Ms. Morris requested committee member to be present at entrance meeting of next audit to ensure specific oversight concerns are included. Timeline of audit was discussed; audits are timed with first interim report that comes out in December; District requested extension for this year; California school districts are required to submit their audit reports to the county by December 15; bond auditors are not able to start year-end fieldwork until those unaudited actuals are finalized and approved by the board, which typically happens in September; government shutdown in October caused delay of the release of the compliance supplement for federal

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of February 4, 2026 programs from the federal government to complete audit work without that guidance; bond audit usually reported to committee at January meetings. CLA is also responsible for District financial audit and bond audit. 8. COMMITTEE COMMENTS – District is making strides with transparency; looking forward to working with KeyAnalytics; progress in staffing with additional members and consultants; clean audit; substantive material for committee to review; concerned external auditor for the bond is not separate from District’s finances. 9. ALTERNATE COMMENTS – Echoed previous committee comments with kudos for a clean audit and looking to continue work. 10. NEXT MEETING – The next meeting will be held Wednesday, March 4, 2026, 5:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the District Administration Office. Next agenda will include results from timing poll; would like more background information on the softball field case; continue discussion on site walk; possible community outreach with project involvement; discussion of meeting date frequency; review and edit bylaws 11. ADJOURNMENT – Ms. Morris adjourned the meeting at 6:48 p.m.

EXHIBIT B

SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEASURE ABC MARCH 4, 2026  BOND FACILITIES PROJECTS (NOTICE OF COMPLETION, CHANGE ORDERS, AWARD OF CONTRACT & CONTRACT AMENDMENTS)  FACILITIES UPDATE EXHIBIT B

SUMMER 2026 ROOFING PROJECTS Campus / Site Project Phase: Construction Start Dolores Huerta MS Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Commercial & Industrial Roofing) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 Mingay - Adult School Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Best Contracting) pending board approval March 5 6/15/2026 Walt Disney ES Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Best Contracting) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 Providencia ES Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Best Contracting) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 Bret Harte ES Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Best Contracting) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 District Service Center Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Best Contracting) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 District Office - Admin Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Commercial & Industrial Roofing) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 Thomas Edison ES Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Commercial Roofing) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026 Roosevelt ES Roofing Material (Garland) and Roof Construction (Best Contracting) pending board approval March 5 5/29/2026

GIRLS SOFTBALL FIELDS Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start BURBANK HIGH Pre-Design Phase – Survey April 2026 2027/2028 JOHN BURROUGHS w/ Parking Structure + Tennis Courts Pre-Design Phase March 2026 2027/2028

DEAF & HARD OF HEARING (DHH - INTEGRATED MASS COMMUNICATION) Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Burbank HS Programming in Feb/April 2026 May 2026 October 2026 Muir MS Programming in Feb/April 2026 May 2026 October 2026 Washington ES Programming in Feb/April 2026 May 2026 October 2026

HVAC REPLACEMENTS Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start 22 sites Site Assessment (Budlong) pending board approval March 5 March 2026 Summer 2027, 2028, 2029 Burbank HS Purchase of 2 Replacement units for Room 1210 and Library pending board approval March 5 Installation to be done by BUSD Facilities Department once units have been received

ENTRY SECURITY RECONFIGURATION / ADA Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Thomas Edison ES Pre-Design – Survey Architect (PJHM) and Land Survey (Becker & Miyamoto) pending board approval March 5 March 15, 2026 Summer 2027 Emerson ES Programming in March/April 2026 May 2026 Summer 2028 Bret Harte ES Programming in March/April 2026 May 2026 Summer 2028 Roosevelt ES Programming in March/April 2026 June 2026 Summer 2028 Washington ES Programming in March/April 2026 May 2026 Summer 2028

ACCESS COMPLIANCE PROJECTS (ADA) Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Jefferson ES Pre-Design - Survey March 15, 2026 Summer 2027

PLAYGROUNDS – SAFETY – ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start 11 Elementary sites Programming in March 2026 – ADA/Play Equipment District- Wide Survey Complete

SITEWORK – ADULT SCHOOL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Mingay - Adult School - Storm Drain and Landscape Improvements Programming in March 2026 March 2026 Spring 2027

SITEWORK Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Burbank HS - Concession Stand Programming in March 2026 – pending board approval March 26 March/April Summer of 2027 Burbank HS - New Storage Building with Bleacher seating above DSA approved 2024. Will Rebid in 2026/27.

SECURITY CAMERAS Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Luther Burbank MS Programming in winter 2026 After tech infrastructure Huerta MS Programming in winter 2026 After tech infrastructure Muir MS Programming in winter 2026 After tech infrastructure

ACCESS CONTROL Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start Burroughs HS Programming in Winter 2026

FIRE ALARM UPGRADE Campus / Site Project Phase Start Design Date Construction Start TBD Programming in 2026 2027-2028

EXHIBIT C

1 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES – MEASURE ABC BOND PROGRAM RFP No.: 26-XX Where is the contract? Does a program management firm require a license? Issue Date: [Insert Date] Proposal Due Date: [Insert Date and Time] Contact: Assistant Superintendent, Business Services 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The Burbank Unified School District (“District” or “BUSD”) is committed to providing safe, modern, accessible, and future-ready educational environments that support academic excellence, student well-being, operational efficiency, and long-term community stewardship. In alignment with these commitments, the District adopted a comprehensive Facility Master Plan 2023 following a districtwide evaluation of facility conditions, infrastructure performance, modernization needs, safety systems, accessibility compliance, technology infrastructure, and programmatic requirements across all campuses. Background: The Burbank Unified School District serves roughly 15,000 students in TK-12, inclusive of adult school programming, at 21 school sites in the City of Burbank, California.The Facility Master Plan identifies a long-term capital investment strategy totaling approximately $366,507,920.00, ($1,421,760.049.00) inclusive of contingency and escalation assumptions. The plan reflects a systematic and data-driven assessment of: ($458,205,000.00 ) what is not included? The ABC Bond was passed in November of 2024 for $458,205,000.00. • Aging building systems and deferred maintenance • HVAC, electrical, and utility infrastructure deficiencies • ADA compliance gaps and accessibility improvements • Campus safety and security modernization • Technology infrastructure upgrades Fire alarm /suppression • Roofing and building envelope repairs • Site modernization and campus reconfiguration • New construction at select sites • Programmatic enhancements including STEM, wellness, performing arts, and nutrition servicesEXHIBIT C

2 The voter-approved Measure ABC Bond Program provides the financing mechanism to implement these priorities in a structured, fiscally responsible, and transparent manner. The magnitude and complexity of the ABC Master Plan requires disciplined program- level governance, rigorous financial controls, strategic phasing, escalation management, risk mitigation, and consistent public reporting. Accordingly, the District seeks to retain a highly qualified Program Management firm with demonstrated experience leading large-scale California K–12 bond programs of comparable scope and complexity. 2. MEASURE ABC BOND PROGRAM OVERVIEW The purpose of this Request for Proposals (“RFP”) is to solicit detailed, competitive proposals from qualified professional firms capable of serving as the District’s Program Manager for the implementation of the Measure ABC Bond Program. The District’s objectives in issuing this RFP are to: 2.1 Establish Program-Level Governance and Structure The District intends to implement a comprehensive Program Management framework that integrates: • Strategic capital planning • Multi-year project sequencing and phasing • Budget alignment with Facility Master Plan selected priorities • Bond issuance planning and cash flow forecasting • Clear accountability structures • Defined roles between District leadership and external consultants The selected Program Manager will be responsible for establishing and maintaining this framework. 2.2 Ensure Rigorous Fiscal Stewardship Measure ABC represents a significant public investment. The District is committed to safeguarding bond funds through: • Structured budget controls • Real-time encumbrance tracking – accounting dept resp.? • Contingency monitoring • Escalation exposure analysis • Change order oversight • Audit-ready financial reporting • Compliance with Proposition 39 requirements The Program Manager must demonstrate expertise in public-sector financial controls and bond accountability systems. 2.3 Deliver Projects on Schedule and Within Approved Budgets

3 The ABC Master Plan encompasses infrastructure renewal, modernization, safety upgrades, new construction, and program enhancements across multiple sites. The District expects the Program Manager to: • Develop and maintain a master program schedule • Integrate DSA review timelines and regulatory approvals • Manage procurement strategies • Monitor Oversee consultant and contractor performance – Shouldn’t this be the project manager responsibility. • Identify and mitigate schedule risk • Proactively manage escalation pressures The District seeks a firm capable of balancing long-term strategic sequencing with day- to-day operational execution. 2.4 Protect the District from Risk The scale of the program requires proactive management of: • Construction risk • Claims exposure • Regulatory compliance • Escalation volatility • Scope creep • Funding capacity constraints The selected firm must demonstrate sophisticated risk management protocols and dispute avoidance strategies appropriate for a multi-year capital program of this magnitude. 2.5 Maintain Transparency and Public Trust The District is committed to full transparency with: • The Board of Education • The Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee • The community and taxpayers The Program Manager will be expected to support regular public reporting, develop program dashboards, prepare Board presentations, and coordinate audit processes to maintain public confidence in the stewardship of bond funds. 2.6 Align Capital Delivery with Educational Mission While the ABC Master Plan is capital-focused, its ultimate purpose is educational. The Program Manager must understand that project delivery must minimize disruption to instructional programs, support operational continuity, and align facility improvements with the District’s instructional priorities. 2.7 Measure ABC Cost Over

4 The total projected cost of the ABC Master Plan, inclusive of contingency and escalation, is: $366,507,920.00 Program Cost Breakdown: Category Total Cost Infrastructure, ADA, and Systems $67,801,963.00 Modernization, New Buildings, Site Improvements $275,805,535.00 Program Enhancements & Specialized Improvements $366,507,920.00 The selected Program Manager will oversee planning, design, procurement, construction, financial controls, and compliance for projects across all District sites. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Program Management Services under this RFP are professional services as defined under California Government Code §53060. Selection will be based upon demonstrated competence, qualifications, experience, organizational capacity, and best overall value to the District. The District seeks a firm that will function as a strategic partner — providing executive- level leadership, structured program oversight, and disciplined operational management — throughout the life of the Measure ABC Bond Program. The selected firm shall provide services including, but not limited to: Strategic Program Oversight • Develop and maintain a comprehensive Program Management Plan • Establish program governance structure • Align phasing strategy with District priorities and funding capacity • Develop multi-year master schedule Financial Controls and Fiscal Stewardship • Implement structured bond accounting controls • Develop and maintain real-time budget tracking system • Monitor contingency usage and escalation exposure • Provide multi-year cash flow projections • Coordinate bond issuance planning support Project Delivery Oversight • Oversee design consultants and construction managers • Support procurement strategy (Design-Bid-Build, Lease-Leaseback, etc.)

5 • Monitor contractor performance- Inspectors? • Monitor Review and manage change orders - ? • Identify schedule risk and mitigation strategies Regulatory and Compliance Management • Ensure DSA compliance • Monitor CEQA and environmental review processes • Coordinate DIR labor compliance • Support Proposition 39 compliance • Prepare audit documentation Governance and Reporting • Prepare monthly program reports • Develop Board presentation materials • Support Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee meetings • Provide dashboard reporting and performance metrics 4. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Because this program represents a significant public investment, the District must ensure that only firms with demonstrated capacity and experience are considered. Minimum qualifications are intended to protect the District from execution risk and ensure capable leadership from day one. Firms must meet the following qualifications: • Demonstrated experience managing California K–12 bond programs exceeding $300 million in total value • Experience with DSA-regulated school construction • Demonstrated implementation of public-sector financial control systems • Experience providing Board-level and CBOC reporting • No conflicts of interest under Government Code §1090 • No disqualifying findings of fraud, financial misconduct, or debarment • Ability to provide a dedicated Program Executive and fully staffed support team Failure to meet minimum qualifications may result in disqualification. 5. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The District seeks comprehensive proposals demonstrating technical competence, fiscal discipline, staffing capacity, and program leadership.

6 Proposals shall include: A. Executive Summary • Overview of firm • Understanding of the ABC Master Plan • Summary of program approach B. Firm Experience • Description of comparable K–12 bond programs • Total value of programs managed • References (minimum three public agencies) C. Staffing Plan • Organizational chart • Resumes of key personnel • Identification of dedicated vs. shared staff • Estimated hours per role • Hourly Rates D. Program Management Approach • Governance model • Financial controls framework • Schedule management methodology • Risk mitigation strategy E. Cost Proposal • Annual fee structure • Five-year not-to-exceed maximum – why not try for 3 years then hire a bond manager to maintain the programming of the projects. • Breakdown by position and hourly rate • Any reimbursable expenses F. Litigation and Claims History • Disclosure of pending or prior disputes • Description of claims management approach G. Conflict of Interest Certification

7 6. EVALUATION CRITERIA Criteria Weight Relevant K-12 Bond Experience 25% Staffing & Key Personnel 20% Financial Controls & Reporting 15% Understanding of BUSD Facility Master Plan 15% Cost Proposal & Interview 25% The District reserves the right to conduct interviews, request additional information, and negotiate final terms. 7. CONTRACT TERM The anticipated contract term is: • Three (3) years initial term • Two (2) optional one-year extensions • Maximum five (5) years Contract form will include termination for convenience and performance standards. 8. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION The selected firm must maintain: • $5,000,000 General Liability • $5,000,000 Professional Liability • $2,000,000 Automobile Liability • Statutory Workers’ Compensation Full indemnification of the District is required 9. Attached is the BUSD master agreement and exhibits . Attachment C - Approval of the Form of Master Agreement to be signed and included 10. PROTEST PROCEDURES AND RESTRICTIONS • All communications must be directed to the designated District contact. • Lobbying of Board members is prohibited. • Proposals are subject to Public Records Act disclosure. • Formal protest procedures will govern this procurement.

8 11. BOARD APPROVAL Final award is subject to approval by the Board of Education.

EXHIBIT D

Burbank Unified School District School Facilities Oversight Committee Report Measure ABC March 4, 2026 Prepared byFinancial Activity From Inception of Measure ABC To February 17, 2026EXHIBIT D

Burbank Unified School District CategoryCommittee Member Community Business RepresentativeJason Clark Senior Citizen RepresentativeDiana Abasta Taxpayer Organization RepresentativeMatt Benson Parent of Enrolled Student RepresentativePreston Joseph Parent-Teacher Organization RepresentativeKirsten Morris Community-At-Large RepresentativeDiana Simon Community-At-Large RepresentativeAri Altman AlternateJulie Grair AlternateVictor A. Taraceha AlternateBilyana Decker TitleName Interim Assistant SuperintendentJason Hasty Project ManagerRobin Rickman Project ManagerMalihe Shokouhi School Facilities Oversight Committee Members Measure ABC 1

$80,000,000 $378,205,000 2024 Measure ABC G.O. Bond Authorization $458,205,000 2024 Measure ABC Authorization - 2025 Series A 2024 Measure ABC Authorization - Remaining Balance Measure ABC Overview On November 5, 2024, the voters of the Burbank Unified SCHOOL DISTRICT authorized Measure ABC under the Proposition 39 statutes. Measure ABC authorized the issuance of $458,205,000 million in G.O. Bonds. The net proceeds of the Bonds are intended to improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and sewer infrastructure; and replace leaky roofs. 2 Series A of Measure ABC was issued on May 28 th , 2025

Measure ABC Revenue and Expenditures  Measure ABC Combined Revenue includes all Bond Measure issuances to date, as well as any interest earned on those funds.  Measure ABC Project Expenditures show Measure ABC funds that have been paid on projects thus far, with the Remaining Cash Balance reflecting the commitments to future POs. 3 $0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 $90,000,000 $79,610,778 $904,350 $32,953,206 $47,561,921 Measure ABC Combined Revenue = $80,515,128 Measure ABC Funds Generated Interest Earnings Project Expenditures Remaining Cash Balance

Phase I Measure ABC Projects 4 Technology Infrastructure Softball FieldsDistrict Wide Roofing Elevator Lift Escalator HVAC & Ductwork

5 Measure ABC Projects Expenditures by Campus and Project Scope Expenditures by Campus Expenditures by Project Scope

Roofing Projects Project Status  Summer 2025 roof repair projects at 10 campuses have been completed  Summer 2026 roof repair projects at 6 campuses, Adult School and District Facilities will begin on May 29, 2026 Current Project Description District-Wide roof replacement and repair. Total Roofing Estimated Budget: $47,948,000 Summer 2025 • 10 Campuses Summer 2026 • 6 Campuses • District Facilities 10 District-Wide Roof Repair and Replacement 6

7 Measure ABC Roofing Projects Encumbrances and Expenditures Encumbered Balance is the difference between the Encumbered amount (Purchase Orders opened for a project) less the Expenditures (amounts paid against those Purchase Orders)

Measure ABC Project Expenditures Vendor Report From Inception to February 17, 2026