Land Use & Zoning Committee - Agenda Meeting

>> Check. Check. Check. Check. Check. Check. All Righ. >> Good evening. >> We're going call this agenda meeting to order its NOVEMBER 18th. We're going to go ahead and start the Yeezy agenda meeting. With item number one, 25, 1, 7, 2, We have a open close knew Item number 2, 25, 1, 7, 3, ex parte open, close amend move. Anything in the amendment that we need to be aware Know some stuff. Okay. Item number 3.25 For 87. This is the. Bill. On Cortez Council present care because district he's going to be here tonight. So will you want to go through anything on their own? Okay. Land used companions onein. 25 25 for 88 ex parte Open. Close amended move with conditions. >> Yeah, >> What you got for us. MISTER Rheingold. This one actually is going to have a modification. There's a new NOVEMBER 13th written description. I've handed out a copy to all of Easy committee members this removes the live animal processing component of the request of that is being removed from the written description. With that being said, the planning department no longer needs or recommends the conditions which were specifically tied to that use. So at this point, if the committee was to move forward with approving the item, the only amendment would simply be to have a revised written description dated NOVEMBER 13th 2025 and that I'm available for an additional questions that you want to have. Okay, cool. So and I think you might want to clarify that. According to this. It's the butcher and lied animal processing, right? So can you kind of >> explain the difference there? And so I'm actually going to kick it over to the planning Department to explain the butchering component. >> In the context of the zoning code. Okay. MISS Abby. >> So so, yeah. So the processing of live animals on site where you kill them and process the meat to then be sold in the grocery store. That portion of it will be removed. But in regards to like the grocery store that exists there today and the butcher shop that already and there today where they slice. Already processed meat there that will continue to exist regardless of if this is owning goes through, it's similar to like how a Publix has their deli section. >> They're already permitted by right to do. But Shireen. And their current zoning where they're at right now. Okay. >> I'm getting sidebar questions. So I want to also have point apartment explain this as well to make sure. And I think this is what they were saying. The planning department interpretation of the written description. Is that commercial retail sales and service establishments includes. Butchering. Is that your interpretation of that portion of the written description? >> To the extent that the animals are already killed in process in the meat just comes on site to be sold to customers. Yes, that that is allowed under the current zoning district and the commercial retail sales and service use. >> It's question of All right. My things all weird. That's ok, MR. Chair the question you just said process that killed him processed. I thought that the way it works. Now that. >> They could be. >> His cause. Is there a differentiation between if they're killed off site and then brought there too, caught up in the special way as opposed to just being processed and brought up to to be sold there because I want to take it to the facility, which obviously party tonight and what I understand is the way this new application that we're hearing about is that they're going do the the actual killing of the animal off site. And then just package that send it over. And then they'll cut it up. There is that correct? Okay. We're good. Thank you. >> And that's what what they're currently doing, right? Ok, cool. >> All right. Ann. >> No other questions or anything. So we'll go to item number. >> Fi >> so real quick answer on go back on. 48. We don't need to take up any of the conditions if we take up item. Number the amendment with the new description. That is correct. The conditions will fall out. You'll simply just have a revised written description. >> All right. I'm number 5 to 25 6.27 Open. Close move. >> You got conflicting recommendations on that planning department to pc approval. What was the voting Planning Commission? Why that's not on. Vote at Planning Commission was a tie 3 to >> Around 06:20am. It I was sick. So it was unanimous. Okay. And same for 6.28 correct. So item number 6. 25 6.28 Ex parte. >> Open close in Mendon new with conditions again. Conflicting planning commission conditions like what was the can you? What's the deal here? What are we got? Conflicting and was a planning commission. >> To the chair. So for the land use 6.27 >> The the parcel. It's off Moncrief and the front portion is cgc and that is fine. But then it extends back into the residential. And so for that reasons and probably mention it's just encroachment of commercial into the residential neighborhood. That was like the main thing that planning found. Okay. And that was on the land use direct. Okay. What about his own inside? >> And kind of thing. >> Similar concerns and one of the commissioners from the planning Commission lives in the area and felt like it was appropriate and a good development after that discussion. A lot of the commissioners just voted to approve an interesting and what commissioner wasn't commissioner on Monday. Holder. Okay. >> And what would the anything? Anything in the conditions, MR. I know that need to be addressed. >> Yet to the chair, I'd reached out to the applicant twice now just about trying to clarify some of the aspects of the conditions that I thought were a little bit confusing. I have not heard back from the applicant and hopefully if the applicant shows up before the meeting, I'd love to just have an opportunity to discuss that with the applicant. >> I did receive a text from him asking for a different question. So yeah, he should be here tonight. All right. Moving on item number 7, 5, continue. Item. Number 8.25 Sic 74 ex Parte Open, close amended, move. Nothing crazy on the amendments Number 9. 25 Can continue. And number 10, and 25 7.24 4 is differ. Item number 11, 2025 7.51 open. Close move. Number 12, 2025, 7, 5, 2, ex parte open, close move. Item 13. 25 7.53 Open closed new 14. 25 7.54 Ex parte Open. Close move. Item 15. 25 75 ex parte open. Close move. 16. 25 7.56 ex parte open. Close move. 17. 25 can continue. 25 78 open continue. As Which Where is the exact hear? What's the one from Zach Miller that's getting were withdrawn. Doesn't to the 8. 58. Okay. So on that one. >> There might have been some confusion on whether or not we wanted to just follow the normal process. It is going to planning Commission this Thursday and will officially been we withdrawn there and we can send a pc letter to the next. Do you see that that they recommended withdrawing it and we can officially do it. There. Can we just what role here? And then go to d c. >> I guess you can. I'd indicated the applicant that it expected to kind of just follow the normal path. But if you guys want to I think we all if we can do, I don't see the need to keep it on the anyone's agenda. >> If they know that they're going to withdraw, been Gaffney's that just withdraw. Okay. Yeah. So with that, do we need to even have the public here? Can we just say we're going withdraw this and we don't need right. >> If there any public comments on the withdrawal itself that MAY be the limited scope of what you would hear things. Okay. So public and has to be >> limited to the withdrawal. >> So >> write that down. 19 devise 79 ex parte open. Close amending move with conditions. What we've got going on here. >> But not know basically what happened is this is prior pd. There were some conditions regarding signage. The applicant came forward to ask just to remove those conditions. But otherwise the conditions that were with the original pd will stay there. But I defer the plane, Department of 5 misstated anything parents giving me the heads-up k? >> Is this is the is this. >> Okay of those. Is this the school signage, right? Got it. Looks more terrifying and it is. Alright. 19 are sorry. That was 19. This is 20 item 2025. 7.60, expert today. >> Open close move. 21. 25 7.61 open continue. Item-number. That's Alright, following items are being deferred with the public hearing next cycle on 12 to 25 item number. 25 7, 98, 7, 9, 9, 881. 82 83. 84. 8 or 8.21 The following bills on second reading. 25 a 23. 24. 25 a 26. A 27 8.28 a 29 30. 31. 32 8.45? Any other questions from