POLISCOPE

The public record

ROSEVILLE (SACRAMENTO COUNTY)Decisions publishedPartial coverage

Board of Appeals Meeting - January 22, 2026 (2026-01-22)

Thursday, January 22, 2026 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Recorded outcome

Board of Appeals Meeting - January 22, 2026 (2026-01-22)

Why it matters

The official meeting record is available below. Item-level plain-language summaries are not available yet.

What happens next

No later meeting or follow-up date is stated in the reviewed record.

An official outcome record - an action agenda or minutes - is published for this meeting.

Record text

No recording or transcript is held for this meeting.

MINUTES # January 22, 2026

# BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING 3:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 311 Vernon Street Roseville, CA

## 1. CALL TO ORDER

Chairperson Tom Rutherford called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.

## 2. ROLL CALL (SILENT)

The following Hearing Panel members were present:

Tom Rutherford Andrea Seminer Sandeep Upamaka

The following Staff members were present:

Travis Cochran, Senior Deputy City Attorney Lynda Risucci, Board Secretary

## 3. IDENTIFICATION OF CHAIR

Chairperson for the January 22, 2026 hearing was Tom Rutherford.

## 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Chairperson Tom Rutherford led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

## 5. PUBLIC COMMENT

No one from the public offered any comments.

---

## 6. SWEAR IN

No swear in took place as the Appellants and Complainant were not present at the hearing.

## 7. MATTERS TO BE HEARD

## 7.1. Notice of Violation No.: 2025-38797 Appellant: Brayden Barrette, 9017 Running Wolf Way, Roseville, CA 95747 Roseville Municipal Code Section 16.16.140(B) – Prohibited Fireworks -76 Counts

The appeal was withdrawn and no hearing was held for this matter

## 7.2. Administrative Citation No.: T08583 Appellant: Abdullah Oryakhail • Roseville Municipal Code Section 10.58.100(a) – Municipal Parking Facilities – Restrictions on Use

At 3:15 p.m., the Appellant was not present. According to section VII(A) of the rules for Administrative Hearing Procedures, if the responsible party fails to appear for the hearing within 15 minutes after the hearing commences, the responsible party’s appeal will be automatically denied.

## A. Panel Decision:

In regard to Roseville Municipal Code Section 10.58.100(a), Municipal Parking Facilities – Restrictions on Use, a motion was made by Andrea Seminer and seconded by Sandeep Upamaka to deny the appeal and uphold the citation because the appellant failed to appear.

The motion passed with the following vote:

AYES: ALL

NOES: NONE

Chairperson Tom Rutherford signed the decision form (Exhibit 7.2-A).

---

## 7.3. Administrative Citation No.: 22041 Appellant: Derek Koonce • Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.12.010, Leash Law, Three Counts • Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.12.050, Aggressive Behavior, Three Counts

At 3:15 p.m., the Appellant was not present. According to section VII(A) of the rules for Administrative Hearing Procedures, if the responsible party fails to appear for the hearing within 15 minutes after the hearing commences, the responsible party’s appeal will be automatically denied.

## A. Panel Decision:

In regard to Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.12.010, Leash Law, Three Counts, and Roseville Municipal Code Section 7.12.050, Aggressive Behavior, Three Counts, a motion was made by Andrea Seminer and seconded by Sandeep Upamaka to deny the appeal and uphold the citations because the appellant failed to appear.

The motion passed with the following vote:

AYES: ALL

NOES: NONE

Chairperson Tom Rutherford signed the decision form (Exhibit 7.3-A.)

## 8. ADJOURNMENT

A motion was made by Andrea Seminer and seconded by Sandeep Upamaka to adjourn the hearing.

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
AgendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
BudgetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Board of Appeals Meeting - January 22, 2026 (2026-01-22)

Not claimed by this page

  • Verified meeting decisions with item-specific public-source evidence
  • Item-level plain-language summaries are not available; this page does not infer individual agenda items.
  • Item-linked, attributed deliberation
  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • A plain-English overview is not available.
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • A transcript is not available.
  • No audio or video recording is linked.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: 3e780cf974b299471ab933e849802e2d. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record