School Facilities Oversight Committee - 4-13-2026

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT School Facilities Oversight Committee MEASURE ABC BOND Committed to providing clean, safe and accessible campuses for our students, staff and community. NOTICE OF MEETING Date: April 13, 2026 Time: 5:30 p.m. Location: District Office Board Room 1900 West Olive Avenue Burbank, California 91506 The agenda packet is available for review online at www.burbankusd.org and at the District Service Center Building, Facilities Services, 510 South Shelton Street Burbank, 91506 Any individual with a disability who requires reasonable accommodation to participate in a School Facilities Oversight Committee meeting may request assistance by contacting the Facilities Office at 818.729.5502.

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE April 13, 2026 A G E N D A 1. CALL TO ORDER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the District is providing alternatives to in-person attendance for viewing and participating for this meeting. Any individual or group representative may address the Committee (in-person only) on any agenda item or subject within its jurisdiction. An individual or group representative may address the SFOC Committee on any agenda item by completing a white request card. Speakers are requested to state their name prior to speaking to the committee. No more than five (5) minutes may be allotted to each speaker, except by unanimous consent of the committee. The meeting will be streamed by visiting: https://www.burbankusd.org/district-info/board-of-education/board-of-education- and-governance-committee-meetings-agendas-and-videos The approved minutes of the meeting will be posted online at www.burbankusd.org. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF March 4, 2026 EXHIBIT A 3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE 4. PJHM PRESENTATION – JEFFERSON ADA POT EXHIBIT B 5. BYLAWS REVIEW SUB-COMMITTEE 6. SFOC FACILITIES PROJECT STATUS UPDATE EXHIBIT C 7. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 8. ALTERNATE COMMENTS 9. NEXT MEETING • ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: TO BE DETERMINED AT MEETING 10. ADJOURNMENT

EXHIBIT A

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure ABC SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Minutes of the Meeting Held on March 4, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Measure ABC Bond School Facilities Oversight Committee was called to order by Vice Chairperson Diana Abasta at 5:07 p.m. Committee Members present: Diana Abasta, Matt Benson, Ari Altman, Preston Joseph, Diana Simon and Jason Clark. Kirsten Morris was absent. Alternate Members present: Julie Grair and Victor Taraceha Also present: Board Member Kelsey Olsen, Interim Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Dr. Jason Hasty, Sr. Administrative Assistant to Director of Facilities Crystal Cozakos, Project Manager Robin Rickman, Project Manager Malihe Shokouhi, Director of Elementary Education Dr. Rebecca Harris, and Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services Peter Knapik. Vice Chairperson Ms. Abasta invited Preston Joseph to lead in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF February 4, 2026 – It was moved by Jason Clark and seconded by Preston Joseph that the minutes of February 4, 2026 be approved, as amended to edit phrase “72-hour notice” on second page and to note Victor Taraceha arriving at 6:15 PM. Motion carried 6-0 with no abstentions. 3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE – Jeff Vanderborght, community member, expressed his concerns regarding the previous board approval of the Measure ABC Financial and Performance Audit that did not include the corrections this committee requested due to timing error, per Mr. Hasty. Mr. Vanderborght mentioned he was told that the audit language would be corrected and returned to the board in the consent agenda at the next meeting. Also noted, that bond audits are not either filed or submitted with the state and questioned what the purpose of the audit is if it doesn’t get recorded or filed. Corrected performance audit to be taken to the board tomorrow night, March 5, 2026. Mr. Vanderborght reviewed the language that was revised and noted the code section focuses on the number of members and the makeup of the committee and not the appointment or 60-day time limit. While the District has acknowledged its failure to appoint the committee as required by law in a timely matter, the audit seems to imply the appointment was made in accordance with state laws and specifically an education code; Mr. Vanderborght expresses the concern of accuracy. He also noted the audit did not identify any personnel expenses for Measure ABC projects despite staff working on projects and questioned who paid for their salaries. Lastly, Mr. Vanderborght inquired if the items going to the March 5 board meeting are all for Measure ABC or Measure S as there is still $1.7 million available from Measure S that needs to be spent. Committee provided comments to speaker. Ms. Abasta noted the SFOC is a very active probing committee; language is important and needs to be accurate. With the information Mr. Vanderborght presented, the public can review report and refer to the specific page being referenced. Also suggested was to review the interim report for fund 21 that lists object codes that explain in terms what each item line is, such as project managers. 4. DISCUSSION OF SFOC MEETING CALENDAR/TIMES – Ms. Cozakos briefed over the poll that was sent out to committee members to keep the meeting time at 5:00 PM or move the meetings to 5:30 or 6:00 PM to make sure it works with everybody's schedule and to ensure quorum is met. The majority said anytime or 5:30 PM. It was moved by Jason Clark and seconded by Ari Altman to move the meetings to 5:30 PM. Motion carried 6-0 with no abstentions. 5. FORMATION OF BYLAWS REVIEW COMMITTEE – Ms. Cozakos reviewed the discussion of frequency of the calendaring; as of right now, meetings are scheduled monthly through June. Typically, these types of committees only have to meet quarterly. Ms. Cozakos explained with Measure S committee met three times: in November to report on a summer update, January to present the bond audit, and then in May to present the annual report; willEXHIBIT A

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of March 4, 2026 need to meet quorum for these meetings. Bylaws state meetings are to be monthly; Ms. Morris suggested a sub committee to review bylaws in previous meeting. Kirsten Morris arrived at 5:20 AM Mr. Hasty reviewed that by law, there's a statute requirement for the committee to meet once per year; the bylaws, as it currently stands, state meetings are monthly. Bylaws would need to be amended with a motion; best practice is quarterly. Ms. Abasta expressed wanting to make sure documentation that goes to the Board of Education, who meets twice a month, is also communicated to the public. Discussion of forming a bylaw review committee followed; to consist of 3 people willing to serve and meet once or twice to briefly discuss recommendations to change the bylaws; sub-committee would submit note minutes to main committee; committee would make motion of recommendations and then decide as a whole to revise the bylaws to meet quarterly. Sub-Committee volunteer discussion followed. It was moved by Preston Joseph and seconded by Jason Clark to create a committee to review bylaws with the following members: Kirsten Morris, Jason Clark, and Preston Joseph. Motion carried 7-0 with no abstentions. 6. SFOC UPDATE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION – FACILITIES UPDATE – Ms. Rickman reviewed the Facilities presentation with project status updates highlighted in purple to illustrate movement on those particular projects. Roofing projects are slated to go for board approval at the March 5 meeting to award the contractor and the purchase of the materials by the owner. The girls’ softball field for Burbank High School is anticipated to start in April; John Burroughs High school has started with design meeting scheduled in upcoming weeks. A proposal from the engineers for the Dead and Hard of Hearing Project has been requested; will take to the board once reviewed; can’t be started until tech infrastructure is completed. Engineers proposal for a full site assessment of all 22 campuses will determine the conditions of all HVACs, chillers, heat pumps and so forth on the campuses and will go to the board for approval on March 5; will be about 20 days of walks with engineers and facility staff to start in March. Questions regarding the two (2) separate units purchased from Sigler for Burbank High School Library and Room 1210 followed. Ms. Rickman explained the two air conditioning units at Burbank High School were in need of repair for quite a while; will be funded by the bond program as part of the overall upgrade; will be ordered and delivered to the site, then facility staff will install units; will be tracked in the assessment to not be replaced again; full assessment report from the engineer will be received in July or August that will breakdown unit description and costs; all criteria is in purchase order/quote that will be attached to board item being presented at the March 5 meeting; like for like unit replacements. Mr. Taraceha requested board reports be provided to committee for review; District staff will try but not all things will be presented in a timely manner in order to keep projects moving; the committee is to look at expenditures to determine the District is making allowable expenditures, not an approval process, but District is providing additional information to keep the committee informed. Five (5) schools don't have secure entrances; choosing architects from list of approved architects and to design the secure entries; proposal for Edison will go for board approval March 5; rest of schools are still in process and will tentatively go to the board next meeting; Emerson, Bret Harte, Roosevelt, and Washington will be in process between 2026 and 2028. Ms. Shokouhi explained upon entering these schools, the entrance leads to a hallway rather than a secure office so that anyone can go in and walk around which presents several unsafe scenarios; also ties in ADA as some schools, like Jefferson, have steps going to front but not a ramp; Edison has been started first with architect, while the other schools are still in process with DSA which could take 18 months-2 years; work to be done during summer but if possible, can be done during school year as well; each site has different needs, scope is not the same but the main idea is for them to have secure entrances which includes an accessible path to the entrance; principals are involved in design meetings; any current repairs would not come from bond funds, only permanent fixes. Committee would like to be invited to design meeting to listen in; architects need to present to committee and board if requested. Jefferson ADA is still in the survey process which will be completed March 14; design can be presented to committee afterwards. All eleven (11) elementary schools have playgrounds for ages 5-12 but with TK coming in, the play equipment is not safe and is too advanced for little kids, 4 years old. Representative of Little Tikes has surveyed the equipment at these sites to put together a report that will determine which parts need to be changed in order to make the playground safe for four years old; will also look at the older kid’s play equipment to update to be compliant with current equipment safety codes; report will include analysis of each site’s equipment to determine what is essential or potential to change. Ms. Simons questioned if ADA was taken into consideration when designing playgrounds and mentioned swings are beneficial for overall child development, proprioceptive senses, specifically with kids with autism or sensory developmental issues; no other site, aside from Emerson, has a swing; conversations during walkthroughs have considered ADA such as the oddly set

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of February 4, 2026 curbs that create a tripping hazard; at this point, new equipment like swings are not being added to most sites unless determined it should be required; special play equipment can be discussed; site level admin are included in walkthroughs and are providing feedback on needs; discussion on adaptable equipment followed; while the equipment is accessible, the District does not have specific wheelchair bound equipment; can be an option if space permits. Ms. Simon expressed the importance of accessibility on the playgrounds for the children to not only have fun but also for socialization skills. Ms. Morris questioned if the surveys for the playgrounds also include the pavement and turf; Ms. Shokouhi confirmed that is included and will be pour in place surfacing; path of travel will also be considered as well in order to pass DSA requirements; PTA parents are included in conversations about design with admin and site staff. The Adult School Landscape Improvement Project is currently programming, with design being started at the end of March; contractor was awarded in February. Burbank High School is the main focus for site work at this time; the first project is the concession stand as the site currently does not have one in their sports area; working with architect to submit proposal; concession stand will be near the football area, accessible by the baseball team and others that the athletic department deems necessary in the sports area. Also, being discussed is the storage building for the pool project that currently has no place to store equipment; new equipment for the pool project is being bought and needs a place to be stored; this project was bid back in 2024, but was not awarded as the District didn’t have money to fund; project has been DSA approved but is still in discussion as a potential project. Concession stand will be ADA accessible to be approved by DSA. Security Cameras, Access Control, and Fire Alarm Upgrade are in programming status and haven’t moved forward yet and won't be starting until the wintertime after IT finishes the infrastructure as it will need the Wi-Fi network. Most Fire Alarms are up to date using Silent Night Fahrenheit which is the standard for the District, only a few are not but are still in good condition; will work with engineer for proposal to convert the last ones. Mr. Taraceha suggested the possibility of working with a contractor to do design work instead of engineers and then going out to bid; is an option but all projects will still have to go through DSA. While previous fire alarm work was covered through Measure S, it was clarified that Measure ABC projects will not be mixed in with Measure S. Mr. Hasty reviewed the draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Program Management Service; professional services does not have to be formal bid; would have regular newsletters, content for the website, Gantt charts, and overall coordination of the programming, as well as working with KeyAnalytics on the accounting. Program Managers will bring a skill set to coordinate projects and bundle cohesively while aligning priorities; having a third party to be held accountable and has specific expertise that relates directly with the bond is better practice. This draft is not going to the board yet; will amend as needed based on feedback; invite only RFP where 3-5 firms would be requested to submit proposals for a bond program manager with the scope; 10 days to respond; staff will score proposals and interview; would then bring selected firm to board to award the contract; SFOC committee members can be part of the evaluation portion; referrals would be based on experience with selected firms but pool can be opened up to more firms for fair and accurate price. This will be a significant cost; in-house staff like clerical and project manager would not need hourly rates which will reduce rates. A request for the selected firm to do a presentation for the SFOC committee can be added to the RFP. Typical contract for a program management is a 3-5-year contract; the selected firm would be doing the subcontracting, coordination, job walks, presenting at the meetings, monthly board presentations and newsletters; estimated about 20% for soft costs, rates will be negotiated; Measure S had similar contract with a one-person management with in-house staff members; will include language of expectations including what services the District will be providing. Committee is on board with hiring team to assist the current project managers but recommends District to be cautious of the price. Ms. Cozakos provided background information on Measure S. Program Management started in 2013 and stayed until 2018 for the majority of the duration of Measure S but was eliminated due to high cost as bond was dwindling; most supporting staff was in-house which included a clerical staff member and an account analyst; Program manager had a separate accounting company like KeyAnalytics; Director of Facilities assisted as a project manager and took over after contractor separated. No motion for committee as it is informational; next step is to review list to invite for RFP submittal; will involve committee in scoring or having entities present to committee; will include language regarding deliverables and closed-out documents as well as Facilities Master Plan and tailor proposals to specific priorities. Ms. Abasta questioned the recent rains and if there were any leaks from the new roofs; Ms. Rickman explained the contractors are under warranty for five years for labor; Facilities department is to call the inspector to look at any roof leaks that have shown up in the last couple of months; most recent leaks have been considered stucco related and not roof related. 7. REVIEW OF BUDGET STATUS – Dr. Hasty introduced Tarana Alam from KeyAnalytics; briefed on future expenditures for legal fees from attorney at AALRR who is vetting contracts; invoices for general fund will be charged separately from bond work. Ms. Alam reviewed the procedure of KeyAnalytics which works directly with the District’s financial records and transfers the data into a proprietary software to analyze the data; date

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of March 4, 2026 reflected on the report is the date that the software is reconciled with the District’s financials; report will include broad summary of the program as a whole; full amount of bond is not available all at once and is issued in increments in order to remain below the $60 per 100,000 pledge that the District made to the community. First series was issues in May 2025; each series is issued 2-3 years from the previous one; typically, about 10-12 years to issue entire amount depending on the District's assessed value and how quickly funds are needed for projects; funds are deposited in Los Angeles County Treasurer and earns interest that is also added to the bond fund. Ms. Alam highlighted the expenditures of Fund 21.3 for Measure ABC Bond; encumbrances reflect the contractual financial obligations recorded from purchase orders; expenditures reflect the balance that has been paid so far; future reports will not see repeat expenditure details but will have cumulative history for each site. Committee reiterated the cautiousness for soft costs vs hard costs like newspaper advertising, consultant costs, bidding software; budget report will be presented quarterly. Measure S balance was briefly reviewed; Measure S is coded by 21.3 and Measure ABC is 21.0; Ms. Cozakos stated the $1.7 million left from Measure S is already encumbered and is to be expended by the end of this year; won’t be split funding any projects bonds as Measure S fund has been accounted for and is wrapping up expenditures. Annual Report will be presented at June meeting; KeyAnalytics will provide financials; Ms. Cozakos will provide template for annual report newsletter that is separated by 3 parts: Chairperson statement, facilities update, and financials of expenditures and encumbrances. 8. COMMITTEE COMMENTS – Mr. Benson highlighted the comments from Mr. Vanderborght regarding staff working on projects that were allocated within that budget and the remaining $1.7 million to Measure S is still allocated to be used. Committee members showed appreciation for staff and information being provided. 9. ALTERNATE COMMENTS – Echoed previous committee comments with appreciation and thanks to the staff. 10. NEXT MEETING – The next meeting will be held Wednesday, April 13, 2026, 5:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the District Administration Office. Next agenda will include the presentation of the report with bylaws, changes, recommendations as well as scheduling an April site visit. 11. ADJOURNMENT – Ms. Abasta adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m.

EXHIBIT B

p jhmarchitects 4/1/2021 12:02:01 AM THOMAS JEFFERSON E.S. BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSITE IMPROVEMENTS04/03/2604/13/26EXHIBIT B

N 6TH ST CAMBRIDGE DR ETON DR (E) SOLAR STRUCTURE (A# 03-117037) (E) PLAY STRUCTURE A#03-115796 (E) PLAY STRUCTURE PER A#03-115796 (E) BUILDING 4 A# 4875 (E) BUILDING 5 A# 4875 (E) BUILDING 3 ADMINISTRATION A# 4875 & A# 20959 (E) BUILDING AUDITORIUM A# 6779 (E) BUILDING 8 A# 9643 (E) RESTROOMS A# 6779 (E) LUNCH SHELTER A# 20314 (E) BUILDING 2 LIBRARY/CAFE A# 6779 (E) BUILDING 6 A# 6779 (E) BUILDING 7 A# 6779 & A# 9643 (E) BUILDING 9 A# 11681 (E) SAFE DISPERSAL A#03-117348 (E) STORAGE BINS (E) STAFF PARKING (E) MODULARS (E) MODULARS 1 3 4 82 7 7 8 (E) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PER A#117348 AND A#115796 (N) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL REQUIRED FOR NEW PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. (N) ACCESSIBLE FRONT ENTRY (N) ACCESSIBLE SECURE POINT OF ENTRY (N) ON-SITE VISITOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING (N) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR KINDER DROP OFF (N) ACCESSIBLE POINT OF ENTRY FOR SECONDARY STUDENT DROP OFF (N) PATH OF TRAVEL IMPROVEMENTS TO PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PATHWAY TO CONNECT (E) DROP OFF AREAS TO (E) PATH OF TRAVEL PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY LINE 0' N 15' 30' 60' 120' 4/9/2026 2:20:41 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-01 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCOMPOSITE SITE PLAN - MODERNIZATION 04/03/2026 ?PATH OF TRAVEL ?KEYNOTES04/13/2026

N 6TH ST CAMBRIDGE DR (E) BUILDING 3 ADMIN. A# 4875 & A# 20959 (E) BUILDING AUDITORIUM A# 6779 1 11 2 1 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 6TYP OF (3) 6 TYP OF (4) 7 73 5 11 (E) BUILDING 5 A# 4875 5 5 512 1 11 13 15 16 16 16 16 16 21 19 20 22 22 10 1010 10 10 10 1. (N) RAMP 2. (N) STAIR 3. (N) CONCRETE PAVING 4. (N) ASPHALT 5. (N) LANDSCAPE 6. (N) TREE 7. (N) DECORATIVE FENCE AND GATE WITH PERFORATED METAL PANEL 8. (N) DOOR 9. (N) FENCE AND GATE 10. (N) SITE WALL, TYP. 11. (E) CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN 12. (E) ASPHALT TO REMAIN 13. (E) LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 14. (E) TREE TO REMAIN 15. (E) FLAG POLE TO REMAIN 16. (E) SITE WALL TO REMAIN 17. (E) SHELTER TO REMAIN 18. (E) PLAY AND SHADE STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 19. (E) MARQUEE TO REMAIN 20. (E) FENCE AND GATE TO REMAIN 21. (E) PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 22. (E) PROPERTY LINE 23. (E) DRIVE APRON TO REMAIN 24. (N) PARKING STRIPING 25. (N) CATCH BASIN 26. (N) MURAL 0' N 4' 8' 16' 32' 4/10/2026 11:05:43 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-02 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSITE PLAN - ENLARGED 04/13/2026 ?KEYNOTES

(E) LUNCH SHELTER A# 20314 (E) BUILDING 2 LIBRARY/CAFE A# 6779 (E) RESTROOMS A# 6779 4 22 14 20 17 1 13 23 CAMBRIDGE DR 1 3 3 6 5 5 12 5 5 (E) BUILDING AUDITORIUM A# 6779 24 24 24 24 11 11 3 3 3 2 73 2 5 5 16 11 11 12 10 10 10 1. (N) RAMP 2. (N) STAIR 3. (N) CONCRETE PAVING 4. (N) ASPHALT 5. (N) LANDSCAPE 6. (N) TREE 7. (N) DECORATIVE FENCE AND GATE WITH PERFORATED METAL PANEL 8. (N) DOOR 9. (N) FENCE AND GATE 10. (N) SITE WALL, TYP. 11. (E) CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN 12. (E) ASPHALT TO REMAIN 13. (E) LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 14. (E) TREE TO REMAIN 15. (E) FLAG POLE TO REMAIN 16. (E) SITE WALL TO REMAIN 17. (E) SHELTER TO REMAIN 18. (E) PLAY AND SHADE STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 19. (E) MARQUEE TO REMAIN 20. (E) FENCE AND GATE TO REMAIN 21. (E) PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 22. (E) PROPERTY LINE 23. (E) DRIVE APRON TO REMAIN 24. (N) PARKING STRIPING 25. (N) CATCH BASIN 26. (N) MURAL 0' N 4' 8' 16' 32' 4/10/2026 11:05:55 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-03 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSITE PLAN - ENLARGED 04/13/2026 ?KEYNOTES

N 6TH ST (E) BUILDING 4 CLASSROOM A# 4875 (E) BUILDING 5 CLASSROOM A# 4875 1 2 21 5 18 11 11 12 11 13 (E) STORAGE 17 16 3 14 TYP. OF (3) 12 16 20 18 11 9 9 20 6 TYP. OF (2) 222210 5 4 25 26 1. (N) RAMP 2. (N) STAIR 3. (N) CONCRETE PAVING 4. (N) ASPHALT 5. (N) LANDSCAPE 6. (N) TREE 7. (N) DECORATIVE FENCE AND GATE WITH PERFORATED METAL PANEL 8. (N) DOOR 9. (N) FENCE AND GATE 10. (N) SITE WALL, TYP. 11. (E) CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN 12. (E) ASPHALT TO REMAIN 13. (E) LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 14. (E) TREE TO REMAIN 15. (E) FLAG POLE TO REMAIN 16. (E) SITE WALL TO REMAIN 17. (E) SHELTER TO REMAIN 18. (E) PLAY AND SHADE STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 19. (E) MARQUEE TO REMAIN 20. (E) FENCE AND GATE TO REMAIN 21. (E) PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 22. (E) PROPERTY LINE 23. (E) DRIVE APRON TO REMAIN 24. (N) PARKING STRIPING 25. (N) CATCH BASIN 26. (N) MURAL 0' N 4' 8' 16' 32' 4/10/2026 11:05:48 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-04 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSITE PLAN - ENLARGED 04/13/2026 ?KEYNOTES

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26FRONT ENTRY - VIEW 010504/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26FRONT ENTRY - VIEW 020604/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26FRONT ENTRY - VIEW 030704/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26ENTRY EXIT - VIEW 050804/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26AERIAL PERSPECTIVE - VIEW 050904/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26AERIAL PERSPECTIVE - VIEW 061004/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26AERIAL PERSPECTIVE - VIEW 071104/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/26KINDERGARTEN ENTRY - VIEW 011204/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/2613KINDERGARTEN ENTRY - VIEW 0204/13/2026

N 4/1/2026 5:23:25 PM THOMAS JEFFERSON ES SD-5 BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTx 04/01/2614KINDERGARTEN ENTRY - VIEW 0204/13/2026

EXHIBIT C

Measure ABC Bond Program Update April 16, 2026 Presented by Dr. Jason HastyEXHIBIT C

Measure ABC Overview On November 5, 2024, the voters of the Burbank Unified School District authorized Measure ABC under the Proposition 39 statutes. Measure ABC authorized the issuance of $458,205,000 million in G.O. Bonds. The net proceeds of the Bonds are intended to improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and sewer infrastructure; and replace leaky roofs. $80,000,000 $378,205,000 2024 Measure ABC G.O. Bond Authorization $458,205,000 2024 Measure ABC Authorization - 2025 Series A 2024 Measure ABC Authorization - Remaining Balance

Measure ABC Revenue and Expenditures • Measure ABC Combined Revenue includes all Bond Measure issuances to date, as well as any interest earned on those funds. • Measure ABC Project Expenditures show Measure ABC funds that have been paid on projects thus far, with the Remaining Cash Balance reflecting the commitments to future POs. $0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 $90,000,000 $79,545,000 $902,715 $46,688,465 $33,759,250 Measure ABC Combined Revenue = $80,447,715 Measure ABC Funds Generated Interest Earnings Remaining Cash Balance Project Expenditures

Capital Facility Funds * Reflects Capital Facility Fund Balances as of 3/25/2026 Unencumbered Fund Balance

FMP: Priority Structure Priority 1A – Infrastructure / Safety - Critical systems and life-safety needs Priority 1B – Access / Equity - Student access, security, and program equity improvements Priority 2 – Learning / Modernization - Classroom environments and instructional support systems Priority 3 – Program / Enhancements - Athletic, arts, and enrichment upgrades

Notice of Completions (YTD 2025–26) Category Priority (FMP) Count Total Value ($) Key Insight Roofing / Infrastructure Projects Priority 1A 9 $19,441,009 Direct alignment to safety and core infrastructure needs Other Projects (Solar / Misc.) Priority 1A 2 $333,609 Supports infrastructure resiliency and system upgrades Total Completed Projects — 11 $19,774,618 Strong execution of highest-priority FMP projects

25-26 YTD Change Orders Category Count Total Impact ($) Key Insight Deductive Change Orders (Savings) 12 –$3,864,491 Significant cost control, driven primarily by tech optimization Additive Change Orders (Increases) 2 +$13,424 Minimal scope increases across projects Amendments (Material Adjustments) 2 +$369,453 Strategic upgrades (e.g., extended roof life) Net Program Impact 16 –$3,481,614 Program trending well under budget

Board Approved Projects Summary (YTD 2025–26) Project Category FMP Priority # of Items Total Approved Cost ($) Key Insight Roofing & Building Envelope (Construction + Materials) Priority 1A 20+ ~$15.3M Core infrastructure investment; largest driver of bond activity ADA / Path of Travel / Accessibility Priority 1B 2 ~$234K Addresses equitable access and compliance needs Athletics (Softball Fields, Concessions, TK Yard) Priority 1B 5 ~$1.35M Equity and program access improvements Planning / Surveys / CEQA / Engineering Priority 1A / 1B Support 6 ~$360K Pre-construction work to reduce risk and future change orders Program Management (KeyAnalytics) Program Oversight 1 ~$105K (1st yr) ~85k (subsequent yrs) Strengthens financial tracking, compliance, and transparency Other Small Projects (HVAC, Storage, Misc.) Priority 1A 2 ~$54K Targeted infrastructure fixes

25-26 YTD Expenditures by Project and Priority Project FMP Priority YTD Expenditures Approx. Budget Status Insight Tech. Infrastructure – Phase 1 Priority 1A $3,935,918.98 $5.8M – $6.5M On track; major backbone investment underway Roofing / Building Envelope Priority 1A $2,583,959.55 $18M – $22M Early phase; significant work still ahead Solar / Energy Infrastructure Priority 1A $166,804.99 $0.2M – $0.5M Near completion / limited scope Program Management / Procurement Program Support $35,050.00 $0.3M – $0.5M Low cost, supports full program delivery Design / Professional Services 1A / 1B Support $64,691.71 $1M – $2M Early design phase for future work (HVAC, etc.) ADA / DSA / Accessibility Priority 1B $8,462.89 $3M – $6M Minimal spend; major work still ahead Salaries and Benefits Program Support $236,233.35 $0.5M – $1M Bond Project Managers Total — $7,031,121.47 ~$30M – $40M Early stage of overall execution

Measure ABC – Series 1 Budget Snapshot Note: This considers the approximate $26 million spent in 24-25 Project Bucket 2025–26 YTD Total Spent to Date Approx. Total Project Budget Approx. Remaining Need Projected Series 1 Funding Available for This Bucket Roofing / Building Envelope (incl. Hazmat / Testing) $2.58M $28.8M $32M – $36M $3.2M – $7.2M Can likely be covered in Series 1 Technology Infrastructure $3.94M $3.94M $5.8M – $6.5M $1.9M – $2.6M Can likely be covered in Series 1 Solar / Energy Infrastructure $0.17M $0.17M $0.2M – $0.5M Minimal Can be covered in Series 1 Design / Professional Services $0.06M $0.06M $1.0M – $2.0M $0.9M – $1.9M Can likely be covered in Series 1 Program Management / Budget Oversight $0.04M $0.04M $0.4M – $0.8M $0.35M – $0.75M Can be covered in Series 1 ADA / Access / Priority 1B Early Work minimal minimal $4M – $7M Most remains Partially fundable in Series 1 HVAC – Phase 1 / Highest Need Sites assessment only minimal $20M – $30M Most remains Only partial funding from Series 1 Athletics – Turf / Track / Fields minimal minimal $5M – $8M Most remains Likely deferred to Series 2

Measure ABC 25-26 YTD Project Update Project Site(s) Start / Phase Projected Completion Status Summer 2025 Roofing Projects Districtwide (10 sites) — July – Nov 2025 Completed 2025 Roof Material Supply Districtwide — May – June 2025 Completed Summer 2026 Roofing Projects Multiple sites Bids Accepted Fall 2026 (est.) Upcoming Technology Infrastructure – Phase 1 (Network & Backbone) Districtwide Implementation 2026 (est.) In Progress Technology Infrastructure – Phase 2 (Student Devices / ADA Systems) Districtwide Deployment 2026–2027 (est.) Partially Implemented / Ongoing Technology Infrastructure – Phase 3 (Staff Devices / Safety Systems) Districtwide Planning 2027–2029 (est.) Future Phase Girls Softball Fields (Title IX) BHS, JBHS Design 2028–2029 (est.) Planning Phase DHH Communication Systems (ADA) BHS, Muir, Washington Awaiting Proposal 2027 (est.) Design / Programming ADA Accessibility (Jefferson ES) Jefferson ES Design 2027–2028 (est.) Planning Phase Adult School Sitework (Storm Drain / Landscape) Adult School Design 2026–2027 (est.) Design Phase Site Improvements (Concessions / Storage) BHS Design 2027 (est.) Able to incorporate into existing plan HVAC Assessments (Districtwide) 22 sites Assessment 2028+ (multi-year) Assessment Phase Playgrounds (ADA & Equipment) Edison + Districtwide Planning/Design 2027–2028 (est.) Planning Phase Security Reconfiguration (Entrances) Multiple sites Planning/Design 2026–2027 (est.) Planning Phase Security Cameras Middle Schools Summer 2027 2027–2028 (est.) Programming Phase Access Control Systems JBHS Summer 2027 2027–2028 (est.) Programming Phase Fire Alarm Upgrades TBD 2026 TBD Early Planning

Measure ABC – Timing for Next Bond Series Category Estimated Amount / Timing Explanation / Planning Context Series 1 Remaining Capacity (Raw) ~$46M Current balance based on expenditures to date; does NOT include board-approved or upcoming projects Near-Term Commitments (12–18 months) $8M – $16M Includes roofing completion, technology, design, program management, and early ADA work; reduces usable capacity significantly Available Capacity Before HVAC ~$21M – $31M More realistic planning range after accounting for known commitments HVAC – Phase 1 (Key Driver) $20M – $30M Will consume most or all remaining Series 1 capacity; can be phased across multiple bond series if needed Remaining After HVAC (Conservative) ~$0M – $10M Limited flexibility; dependent on final HVAC scope and sequencing Athletics (Turf / Track / Fields) $5M – $8M If pursued within Series 1, this will exceed available capacity and require additional funding (Series 2) Recommended Series 2 Timing Begin early 2027; issue by Fall 2027 Ensures continuity for HVAC, ADA, athletics, and future technology/safety projects

Capital Facility Fund Balances $46,688,465 $12,096,877 $0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 Capital Facility Fund Balances Remaining Fund 25 - Developer Fees Fund Balance MEASURE ABC Remaining Fund Balance

BUSD Bond Program: The Plan Ahead Strengthen Program Management & Oversight Financial Planning & Bond Analytics Compliance, Audit Readiness & Internal Controls Maximize External Funding & Leverage Governance, Transparency & Community Trust Long-Term Strategic Infrastructure Planning

Strengthen Program Management & Oversight • Establish or procure a dedicated Bond Program Manager/Director-level oversight structure to ensure continuity across all Measure ABC projects • Centralize project delivery, change order management, scheduling, and cost controls • Align project execution with Facility Master Plan priorities and long-term capital strategy

Financial Planning & Bond Analytics • Implement multi-year bond forecasting, cash flow modeling, and project-level tracking • Utilize specialized bond analytics (e.g., Key Analytics model) to support: • Scenario planning • Early risk identification • Board and SFOC transparency • Ensure alignment between bond expenditures, developer fees, and Fund 40 strategies