School Facilities Oversight Committee - 06-03-2026

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT School Facilities Oversight Committee MEASURE ABC BOND Committed to providing clean, safe and accessible campuses for our students, staff and community. NOTICE OF MEETING Date: June 3, 2026 Time: 5:30 p.m. Location: District Office Board Room 1900 West Olive Avenue Burbank, California 91506 The agenda packet is available for review online at www.burbankusd.org and at the District Service Center Building, Facilities Services, 510 South Shelton Street Burbank, 91506 Any individual with a disability who requires reasonable accommodation to participate in a School Facilities Oversight Committee meeting may request assistance by contacting the Facilities Office at 818.729.5502.

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE June 3, 2026 A G E N D A 1. CALL TO ORDER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the District is providing alternatives to in-person attendance for viewing and participating for this meeting. Any individual or group representative may address the Committee (in-person only) on any agenda item or subject within its jurisdiction. An individual or group representative may address the SFOC Committee on any agenda item by completing a white request card. Speakers are requested to state their name prior to speaking to the committee. No more than five (5) minutes may be allotted to each speaker, except by unanimous consent of the committee. The meeting will be streamed by visiting: https://www.burbankusd.org/district-info/board-of-education/board-of-education- and-governance-committee-meetings-agendas-and-videos The approved minutes of the meeting will be posted online at www.burbankusd.org. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF May 6, 2026 EXHIBIT A 3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE 4. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ITEMS • REVIEW OF BYLAWS • CALENDAR 26-27 MEETINGS 5. DAG PRESENTATION – PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FOR MEASURE ABC EXHIBIT B 6. SFOC FACILITIES UPDATE – LEASE LEASEBACK EXHIBIT C 7. REVIEW OF BUDGET STATUS EXHIBIT D 8. ADOPTION OF ANNUAL REPORT EXHIBIT E 9. COMMITTEE COMMENTS 10. ALTERNATE/EX-OFFICIO COMMENTS 11. NEXT MEETING • ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: TO BE DETERMINED AT MEETING 12. ADJOURNMENT

EXHIBIT A

BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure ABC SCHOOL FACILITIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Minutes of the Meeting Held on May 6, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Measure ABC Bond School Facilities Oversight Committee was called to order by Chairperson Kirsten Morris at 5:30 p.m. Committee Members present: Diana Abasta, Preston Joseph, Kirsten Morris, Diana Simon and Ari Altman. Jason Clark and Matt Benson were absent. Alternate Members present: Victor Taraceha Also present: Interim Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Dr. Jason Hasty, Director of Facilities Valezka Emes, Sr. Administrative Assistant to Director of Facilities Crystal Cozakos, and Project Manager Robin Rickman. Chairperson Ms. Morris invited Victor Taraceha to lead in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF April 13, 2026 – It was moved by Preston Joseph and seconded by Ari Altman that the minutes of April 13, 2026 be approved, as written. Motion carried 5-0 with no abstentions. 3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE – There were no requests to address the committee. 4. TENCATE PRESENTATION – DISTRICT STANDARD FOR SYNTHETIC TURF – Ms. Rickman introduced Bobby Bellecci from Tencate. Mr. Belleci reviewed the highlights on the history of turf and the fourth generation of Turf, PIVOT. Tencate is the largest turf fiber manufacturer globally, with the company being more than 400 years old; not only manufacturer but also installer; manufactures with no PFAS, no rubber pellets; only ones with non-performance infield developed by a lab of scientist that researches fibers and synthetic turf; no infill so no need to maintain and no longer creating microplastics; once existing turf is pulled up, the stone will be regraded and connected to current drainage; PIVOT Cool will absorb heat, cooling the field; 12-year warranty with product lasting 50% longer as the industry standard is 8 years; manufactures own shock pad with a 25-year warranty which is industry standard; PIVOT essentially performs like grass. Mr. Hasty reviewed the state of the high school fields with John Burroughs being more urgent as the shape poses safety issues and tripping hazards, despite being patched in several places; big holes in turf by PAT lines and field goal; field has been flooding, potentially caused by broken down fiber and infill clogging drainage system; past warranty; looking into other sites and issues such as Adult School that has root issues. Mr. Hasty noted Ms. Rickman has been working on overall District standards and put out an RFP for bids with Astroturf and Tencate in which Astroturf did not respond. Mr. Hasty will be discussing with the board on the immediate need for this project at the John Burroughs Memorial Field; potential summer installation, given the grading piece isn’t a lot and the drainage issue is a simple clog; field will have yellow soccer lines and dark blue flag football lines; will not have any logos as multiple groups will be using field; field will have dark and light green shading at every 5 yards. Since the field shape is a safety issue, it becomes a priority one; in addition, the exposure of bringing a new field that is bond funded will go along way with the community as they will be able to see the end result versus the roofing projects; won’t get a better project with a 12-year warranty. Tencate offers a CMAS contract, a collective sharing contract, where the procurement and bidding part has been done and meets the legal requirements to expedite the process to purchase. Burroughs field and Burbank track resurfacing slated for this year and vice versa for next year; track funding in discussion. While projects like the Softball Field will take design, architecture, survey, and other pieces that will go through DSA, the football field is a rip and replace that does not require DSA or design. Given the state of the field and the long-term solution, makes the football field an allowable project under the bond. Board Member Kelsey Olsen arrived at 6:22 PMEXHIBIT A

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of May 6, 2026 District needs to start ranking projects on priorities but also consider projects that are also safety issues that may not be top priority. Ms. Morris expressed the concern of quick spend projects instead of taking time to look at larger scopes to cover more ground; discussion of ranking and priority continued. Roofing and HVAC are top projects with safety issues with ADA compliance follow. Some projects may be pushed into later series depending on duration of work and priorities of other projects. Committee wants to ensure District is being strategic with the bond money and not be reactionary. While pricing for other performance turf and/or grass options may be cheaper to install, the PIVOT turf has a 50% longer lifespan and no maintenance upkeep so in the long run, the District will save more money; warranty includes workmanship. PIVOT does not need to be refilled. Holes on the bottom of turf are for drainage; nailer board is installed around the perimeter of the field and rolls of turf are glued together at the seams; does not need as much sand and rubber to hold field down as the PIVOT Cool is installed at the bottom to help stabilize but also the fibers are 3 times other performance turf; turf is like a floating mechanism that is able to pull up slightly to allow the athlete to rotate out instead of getting cleats stuck. Turf is 100% recyclable; Tencate has its own recycling plant and can recycle any turf; District will get cost of recycling as the initial scope was just to dispose. Discussion of negotiating pricing for multiple fields followed; Ms. Cozakos briefed on the current inventory; currently, turf is only at the two (2) high schools while the other fields are all grass; both turf fields are way past their shelf life, pushing 15 years and are in crucial need to be replaced; Memorial Field has been the host for both high school football games and soccer as well as community use which has caused more wear and tear; with Burbank High now hosting their football games at their home site, the field will be in bad shape within the next year or two, putting them as a second priority. Tencate did provide proposals for each high school with a discount, pricing is negotiable for other fields. 5. SFOC FACILITIES PROJECT UPDATE – Mr. Hasty reviewed the updated Facilities presentation with project status that will also be presented to the board in the following meeting. Highlighted items are in progress; matched the dollar allocation to what is in the facility master plan; framed what series projects fall into based on the priority in the master plan. Roofing is priority one with the tech infrastructure, which is essentially the data center and switch upgrades, being priority two; storm drain improvements at Adult School and High School Football fields are being slated under series one. Burbank High pool was paid out of Fund 40 (capital outlay), currently in early stages of pool storage building to complete the full scope of pool project. Discussing first series with Project Managers to ensure top priorities are being completed; change orders for tech infrastructure are coming and will take priority over other projects; HVAC project may need to go to series two with how big of a scope it is, along with ADA projects due, to duration of DSA approvals. In series two, the emergency backup lighting system used at the campuses that enables lights to turn back on in case of emergencies will be considered as it is in sad repair due District not having money in deferred maintenance to fix it; pending until questions are resolved. Roofing will continue into series two as well as the tech infrastructure; will include upgrade to PA systems for the Deaf Hard of Hearing (DHH) program; softball fields, HVAC, and potentially elevators will also fall into the series two category. Estimated dollar amounts from Master Plan have been included in the presentation but not all are accurate to what each project will actually cost.TK Playground upgrades will be funded through developer fees. Tech infrastructure proposal is being renegotiated to include additional scope; funding will be offset with Measure S. Amounts will be updated as proposals are received. Discussion of prioritization and value of ranking continued; Facilities Master Plans are done every five (5) years and is a requirement when going out for a bond or OPSC reimbursements with the state; discrepancies have been identified in the 2023 master plan. District will plan priorities and shift as needed; will be transparent to committee; priority drives ranking. HVAC assessments have been completed; inspections were done over a 12 day walk at all 22 campuses; received draft report from engineer BudLong and Ms. Rickman provided review comments; engineer will prepare report for each site and decisions will be made based on their observations and analysis of all the units. Committee would like to see example of report. Mr. Hasty reviewed the items scheduled to go to the board for approval including the Muir Middle School main waterline replacement architect, tech infrastructure phase 1 and 2, Disney shade structure architect, Washington security configuration architect, Burroughs turf field, on-call pool for civil engineers. Mr. Altman suggested looking into energy efficiency or renewable energy funding sources and working with Burbank Water and Power for shade structures that incorporate solar; Mr. Taraceha suggested looking into sponsors for funding opportunities as well. Mr. Hasty reviewed the needs for the bond program; top three areas include organizational alignment, program management structure, and fiscal oversight and controls; strategic bond support will ensure oversight, transparency, and continuity; org chart consists of an oversight committee, program management system that

School Facilities Oversight Committee Minutes of May 6, 2026 includes backup to provide continuity, fiscal responsibility to ensure District is operating in a smart methodical manner with controls in place. Looking at program oversight to provide support with strategic planning and to make sure everything is compliant with CBSC requirements and procurement; need support with expertise in bond programs; program management will assist with cost efficiency and planning of series. Mr. Hasty is proposing the following structure: Director of Bond, internal position 100% bond funded; Fiscal Compliance Supervisor, internal position 50% bond funded; Position Control Manager, internal position 50% bond funded; Clerical Support, internal position. Fiscal Compliance Supervisor would work with auditors to ensure compliance regulations are being followed and would have experience with capital projects and understands the accounting structure in general for the District; time would be tracked by PAR which is a reporting mechanism that shows the amount of time on a task for bond vs general fund. Position Control Manager might potentially be a classified analyst position who will work hand in hand with compliance supervisor and to track positions that are split funded. In comparison with Measure S, the District did have a dedicated program manager, along with an internal project analyst who managed the accounting, compliance, and DSA closeouts as well as a project accounting technician who assisted with accounting and clerical support; these positions termed out when bond funds were completely expended but employees had left positions prior to the end and were eliminated as necessary; Director of Facilities acted as project manager in the last years, Facilities Construction and Operations Technician absorbed clerical administrative support and the Analyst position has been split between accounting and purchasing. Goal is to make second board meeting each month focused on facilities with monthly bond report updates; possible board meetings switching to once a month schedule instead of two per month; discussion continued of tracking split funded positions and the need for a project manager with a Director of Bond in place; administrators or certificated employees cannot be paid out of bond per Proposition 39 but employees who are working specifically on the bond can be. Ms. Morris questioned if a plan is in place to expend the interest accumulated thus far and if amounts in facilities master plan were embellished to account for cost escalation; no plan for interest yet as it is still early; some of the calculations in the facility master plan are off and included a 30% escalation, while the norm is a 10% cushion. Discussion of escalation factors continued. Mr. Altman inquired about the bidding process for the Tencate proposal; Mr. Hasty explained cooperative contracts, such as CMAS or Omnia, which are with contractors who have already been vetted through a bidding process and meet the legal compliance that allows Districts and other companies to use the qualified contractor/vendor for specific types of services without having to do the qualification process; these types of contracts are generally used with technology purchases and material purchases. Mr. Hasty explained, the RFQ for the softball fields was put out to Astroturf and Tencate, both with the same exact qualifications, and Astroturf was non-responsive; the CMAS is allowable for the turf football fields. 6. COMMITTEE COMMENTS – Committee expressed the importance of equity of all students’ safeties and wants to ensure District is not excluding or underrepresenting any schools. Thanked Tencate for the presentation and material examples. Expressed concern towards prioritization of projects but is helpful to have staff bring attention to District needs and also to have vendors present their product and services to the committee. Ms. Morris would like to meet with the bylaws sub-committee to review the updates before presenting to the board to approve changes; will work with District to figure out board meeting presentation. 7. ALTERNATE COMMENTS – Echoed previous committee comments with appreciation to staff. 8. NEXT MEETING – The next meeting will be held Wednesday, June 3, 2026, 5:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the District Administration Office. Next agenda will include the annual report; bylaws amendments; calendaring future meetings; schedule potential roofing site walk over the summer. 9. ADJOURNMENT – Ms. Morris adjourned the meeting at 7:42 p.m.

EXHIBIT B

B O A R D O F E D U C A T I O N P R E S E N T A T I O N Program Management for Measure ABC Introduction to District Advocates Group (DAG) Prepared for Burbank Unified School District · June 4, 2026EXHIBIT B

W H O W E A R E Built by school people, for school people District Advocates Group is a division of Urban Futures, Inc. — a California firm serving public agencies since 1972. A N I N D E P E N D E N T O W N E R ’ S A D V O C A T E What makes DAG different Unlike traditional program and construction management firms, DAG staffs its team with former superintendents, chief business officials, and facilities leaders. We built DAG from the ground up to close the gaps we saw firsthand while working inside districts. Former district leaders Superintendents, CBOs, and facilities directors who have sat in your seat Independent fiduciary We represent the District — not architects, CMs, or vendors. Your interests come first Local, hands-on support A dedicated local program management team with deep LA County school district experience Statewide bench Backed by a strong statewide team with specialized domain expertise Burbank Unified School District 1 1 3 2 4

S C O P E O F S E R V I C E S A full menu of program management support End-to-end support across the bond program lifecycle — tailored to the District's needs and priorities. Pre-Construction Planning • Program direction, goals & vision • Project prioritization & implementation plans • Budgets & forecasting • Risk identification & mitigation strategy Procurement & Contracts • RFQ / RFP process management & scoring • Architect, engineer & CM procurement • Delivery method education and decision support • Contract compliance & milestone tracking Design & Construction • Design coordination & A/E review • Program-level scheduling • Program and construction team oversight • DSA, OPSC & state agency compliance Reporting & Close-Out • Board reporting • Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee support • Prop. 39 performance & financial audits • Commissioning, punch list & occupancy 1 3 2 4 Burbank Unified School District 2

U N D E R S T A N D I N G M E A S U R E A B C Built around Burbank’s needs & priorities Measure ABC is a significant community investment in Burbank’s schools. Our role is to convert that funding into completed projects and improved learning environments, on schedule and on budget, while keeping the community’s trust. A multi-series bond program Measure ABC will be delivered over multiple funding phases. DAG supports the District in aligning each series to bond issuances and master plan priorities. Aligned to the Facility Master Plan Burbank's plan sets the priorities. DAG helps keep project delivery mapped to it as the program evolves. Navigating DSA and state approvals Multi-agency (CDE, DSA, OPSC, SAB, health dept, local fire, etc.) approval processes. DAG assists the District in navigating these agencies to keep work on track. Stretching every bond dollar Developer fees, state funding, and cost control extend local bond funds. DAG supports the District in capturing them. Minimizing disruption to learning Construction happens around active campuses. DAG helps phase work to protect learning time and operations. Transparent to the community Measure ABC stays accountable through clear reporting. DAG supports consistent, plain-language updates. MEASURE ABC SCOPE Infrastructure & Safety Roofing, HVAC, electrical and utility systems, fire and life-safety Access & Equity Secure campus entries, ADA and accessible paths, athletic field equity Modernization Classroom and technology upgrades, future-ready learning environments Burbank Unified School District 3

P R O G R A M L E A D E R S H I P A single point of accountable leadership DAG extends District capacity, coordinates expertise, and keeps execution aligned to schedule, budget, and student-success priorities. Add program capacity Bring planning, construction, finance, procurement, and compliance expertise. Represent the District Advocate for the District throughout the full program. Coordinate teams Centralize leadership, communication, and decisions. Balance strategy and delivery Connect planning and execution to program goals. Accelerate decisions Improve the ability to act while leaders stay focused on students. Build internal capacity Mentor staff and share institutional and industry best practices. Burbank Unified School District 4

F I S C A L S T E W A R D S H I P Stretching bond dollars through disciplined oversight DAG evaluates need, value, schedule, and cost so resources move toward facilities rather than avoidable delays, overhead, or rework. Need, value, learning impact Evaluate decisions through district need, student impact, and long-term value. Spend priorities Direct bond dollars toward facilities outcomes, not unnecessary overhead. Phasing and procurement Reduce scope creep, optimize project phasing, and bundle procurements. Schedule discipline Move projects efficiently to avoid costly delays and construction escalation. Cost balance Manage hard and soft costs for efficiency, competitive bidding, and control. Prioritization reality Navigate priorities when district needs exceed available funding sources. FIXED FEE PRICING Our program management services are provided on a fixed- fee basis, not hourly or as a percentage of construction costs. Fixed fee pricing helps: • Lower total cost over the program • Provide budgeting certainty Burbank Unified School District 5

P R O V E N T R A C K R E C O R D A statewide portfolio of school bond programs $2.07B in voter-approved bond authorizations across DAG's client districts 20 California school district clients served by DAG $6B+ in school construction & modernization successfully delivered by the team across their careers 250+ combined years of K-12 bond program leadership experience Burbank Unified School District 6

L O C A L E X P E R I E N C E Representative bond programs Active bond construction programs served by our Southern California team $285.0M Measure E Ventura County $278.0M Measure S Los Angeles County $28.7M Measure HV Los Angeles County $297.8M Measure SOS Los Angeles County Burbank Unified School District 7

Y O U R L O C A L T E A M The people who would serve Burbank A dedicated team led by our Executive Vice President and supported by DAG specialists in community engagement, finance & systems, design review, grant funding, and state funding coordination — scaled to the needs of the Measure ABC program. Alan Reising EVP, Program Management & Strategy Led Long Beach USD's $4.8B facilities program and served six years as Administrator of Facilities, Planning & Development at neighboring Glendale USD; immediate past Chair of the Coalition for Adequate School Housing (CASH). Dana Grudem Senior Program Manager 25+ years in TK-12 facilities; oversaw $3B+ in bond programs at Long Beach USD and $1.5B+ at Irvine USD; oversees new school development, modernizations, state funding applications, and consultant procurement. Melanie Nazarbekian Planning and Controls Manager 15+ years of school facilities experience in large California districts (Long Beach USD and Glendale USD); supports planning, controls, state-agency coordination, and capital program delivery. Raymond Esparza Senior Project Manager 30+ years in program, project & construction management; led a $3B TK-12 bond program and major healthcare/civic projects from planning through closeout. Burbank Unified School District 8

Thank You We welcome the opportunity to support Burbank Unified School District in delivering Measure ABC. Alan Reising EVP, Program Management & Strategy (562) 631-8037 · alan@dagk12.com District Advocates Group, a Division of Urban Futures, Inc. 1470 Maria Lane, Suite 315, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 · (925) 659-8599 · www.dagk12.com

EXHIBIT C

Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method What it is • Why it can benefit the District • How it supports Measure ABC implementation Board of Education / Superintendent’s Facilities Oversight Committee Burbank Unified School DistrictEXHIBIT C

Why This Conversation Matters Measure ABC requires a delivery strategy that protects scope, schedule, cost, quality, and transparency. Facility needs are significant The Facility Master Plan identifies infrastructure, safety, access, equity, modernization, and program needs across multiple sites. Market conditions are challenging Escalation, labor availability, long lead equipment, and unforeseen conditions can create cost and schedule exposure. Delivery method matters The selected delivery method affects when contractors join the team, how risks are managed, and how cost certainty is developed. Key message: Lease-Leaseback gives the District another tool to deliver complex, time-sensitive, and phased school facility projects with stronger early contractor involvement. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 1

What Is Lease-Leaseback? A statutory school construction delivery method authorized for California school districts. Simple explanation • The District leases school property to a selected developer/contractor, often through a nominal ground lease. • The contractor constructs or improves the facility for District use. • The District leases the completed facility back during the lease term. • Title to the improvement vests in the District under the lease documents. 1 District ground lease 2 Construction / improvements 3 District leaseback 4 District ownership / title Plain English: LLB allows the District to select a qualified partner through a competitive best-value process and bring that partner in early to help plan, price, phase, and deliver the work. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 2

How LLB Differs from Traditional Design-Bid-Build The practical difference is when the builder joins the team and how the District evaluates value. Traditional Design-Bid-Build Lease-Leaseback Sequence Design is largely completed first, then bids are solicited. Contractor input arrives later. Selection Award generally focuses on lowest responsive, responsible bid. Risk profile Late discovery of constructability, phasing, or market issues can lead to change orders or delays. Sequence Contractor may provide preconstruction input earlier while design is still being developed. Selection Award uses competitive best value: objective criteria combining price and qualifications. Risk profile Early input can improve estimating, procurement planning, constructability, phasing, and schedule realism. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 3

Legal Framework and Required Guardrails LLB is flexible, but it is not informal. The process must be documented and auditable. Competitive solicitation The District must use a competitive solicitation process and evaluate proposals using disclosed criteria and methodology. Best value selection The Board awards to the responsive proposer determined in writing to provide the best value to the District. Public award basis The District publicly announces the award and provides a statement of the basis for the award sufficient for external audit. Prequalification / labor compliance LLB projects must incorporate applicable contractor qualification, prevailing wage, labor compliance, and skilled-and-trained workforce requirements. Subcontractor procurement Subcontractor selection and pricing must follow the statutory and contract requirements, including transparent cost support when applicable. Counsel review Bond counsel, construction counsel, procurement, fiscal, and facilities staff should review templates and each project-specific path. Operating principle: use LLB only with a clear record, defined criteria, Board authorization, and a project file that can withstand audit and public review. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 4

Why LLB Can Be Beneficial The value is not avoiding competition; the value is improving project delivery. Early contractor involvement Improves constructability review, phasing, cost estimating, procurement planning, and schedule assumptions. Best value rather than lowest price only Allows the District to consider experience, team qualifications, safety, project approach, schedule, and price together. Stronger cost development Supports development of a guaranteed maximum price or structured pricing after scope and risks are better understood. Reduced change-order exposure Earlier review can identify scope gaps, unforeseen conditions, and sequencing issues before construction starts. Better occupied-campus planning Useful when work must happen around students, staff, school calendars, access, safety, and site logistics. Program consistency A repeatable process can help align bond projects to District standards, FMP priorities, and reporting expectations. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 5

When LLB Makes the Most Sense Use the method selectively where the delivery benefits are strongest. GOOD CANDIDATES • Complex modernization or infrastructure projects • Projects on occupied campuses requiring careful phasing • Projects with significant unknown conditions • Projects with long-lead equipment or schedule sensitivity • Projects where early cost modeling can protect scope • Multi-phase projects requiring site logistics coordination LESS IDEAL CANDIDATES • Simple, fully designed, low-risk scopes • Small projects where formal LLB setup may add unnecessary effort • Projects where lowest-bid procurement is clearly adequate • Work that can be handled efficiently through other lawful procurement methods Strategy: match the delivery method to the project risk profile. LLB should be a targeted tool, not a blanket approach. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 6

How We Would Apply LLB to Measure ABC Strategy A disciplined delivery framework tied to the Facility Master Plan and bond priorities. 1 Screen Screen projects against complexity, timing, unknown conditions, and occupied-campus risk. 2 Select method Compare delivery options: design-bid-build, CUPCCAA, CMAS where lawful, design-build where applicable, or LLB. 3 Procure Use a competitive RFP/RFQ process with objective criteria, scoring, and counsel-reviewed documents. 4 Develop scope and price Use preconstruction services to validate scope, phasing, costs, schedule, constructability, and procurement strategy. 5 Award and monitor Bring the award/GMP to the Board, monitor budget and schedule, and report progress to SFOC/CBOC and the Board. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 7

Talking Points •Lease-Leaseback is a lawful California school construction delivery method that can be used through a competitive best-value process. •The District is not abandoning traditional bidding; we are adding a delivery tool for projects where early contractor involvement improves outcomes. •The method is especially useful for complex, occupied-campus, schedule- sensitive, or phased projects where constructability and cost planning matter early. •Our proposed strategy is to screen each project, document why LLB is appropriate, use counsel-reviewed procurement documents, and maintain an audit-ready file. •SFOC and Board reporting will remain focused on scope, schedule, budget, risk, change orders, and alignment with Measure ABC priorities. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 12

Decision Framework A simple model for deciding when to recommend LLB. Does the project have meaningful complexity? Technical, campus, phasing, schedule, or unknown- condition complexity. Would early contractor input improve the result? Constructability, cost estimating, procurement, schedule, or logistics. Can the District clearly document best value? Published criteria, scoring, award basis, and audit-ready record. Is LLB better than available alternatives? Comparison to design-bid-build, CUPCCAA, CMAS, design- build, or other lawful path. If the answer to all four questions is “yes,” LLB may be the recommended delivery method. If not, staff should select a different lawful procurement strategy. Lease-Leaseback Delivery Method | Board / SFOC 13

EXHIBIT D

Burbank Unified School District School Facilities Oversight Committee Report Measure ABC June 4, 2026 Prepared byFinancial Activity From Inception of Measure ABC To May 13, 2026EXHIBIT D

Burbank Unified School District CategoryCommittee Member Community Business RepresentativeJason Clark Senior Citizen RepresentativeDiana Abasta Taxpayer Organization RepresentativeMatt Benson Parent of Enrolled Student RepresentativePreston Joseph Parent-Teacher Organization RepresentativeKirsten Morris Community-At-Large RepresentativeDiana Simon Community-At-Large RepresentativeAri Altman AlternateJulie Grair AlternateVictor A. Taraceha AlternateBilyana Decker TitleName Interim Assistant SuperintendentJason Hasty Project ManagerRobin Rickman Project ManagerMalihe Shokouhi School Facilities Oversight Committee Members Measure ABC 1

$80,000,000 $378,205,000 2024 Measure ABC G.O. Bond Authorization $458,205,000 2024 Measure ABC Authorization - 2025 Series A 2024 Measure ABC Authorization - Remaining Balance Measure ABC Overview On November 5, 2024, the voters of the Burbank Unified SCHOOL DISTRICT authorized Measure ABC under the Proposition 39 statutes. Measure ABC authorized the issuance of $458,205,000 million in G.O. Bonds. The net proceeds of the Bonds are intended to improve the quality of education; make health, safety and security improvements; construct, modernize, and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; upgrade outdated electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and sewer infrastructure; and replace leaky roofs. 2 Series A of Measure ABC was issued on May 28 th , 2025

Measure ABC Revenue and Expenditures  Measure ABC Combined Revenue includes all Bond Measure issuances to date, as well as any interest earned on those funds.  Measure ABC Project Expenditures show Measure ABC funds that have been paid on projects thus far, with the Remaining Cash Balance reflecting the commitments to future POs. 3 $0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 $90,000,000 $79,610,778 $902,715 $33,308,713 $47,204,780 Measure ABC Combined Revenue = $80,513,493 Measure ABC Funds Generated Interest Earnings Project Expenditures Remaining Cash Balance

4 Measure ABC Projects Expenditures by Campus and Project Scope Expenditures by Site Expenditures by Project Scope

5 Measure ABC Roofing Projects Encumbrances and Expenditures Encumbered Balance is the difference between the Encumbered amount (Purchase Orders opened for a project) less the Expenditures (amounts paid against those Purchase Orders)

Measure ABC Project Expenditures Vendor Report From February 18, 2026 To May 13, 2026

Project: 2010000-91025 - Walt Disney Elem. - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($3,890.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants Project Total: ($3,890.00) 2010000-91025 - Walt Disney Elem. - Roofing Project: 2050000-91025 - Bret Harte Elementary - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($3,665.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants Project Total: ($3,665.00) 2050000-91025 - Bret Harte Elementary - Roofing Project: 2060000-91016 - Jefferson Elementary - Access Compliance (ADA) Vendor Expenditure Description Becker & Miyamoto, Inc. ($24,260.00) Land Surveyor PJHM Architects, Inc. ($31,498.34) Architecture Project Total: ($55,758.34) 2060000-91016 - Jefferson Elementary - Access Compliance (ADA) Project: 2060000-91022 - Thomas Jefferson Elementary - Playground Vendor Expenditure Description Division Of The State Architect ($7,740.00) DSA Fees Project Total: ($7,740.00) 2060000-91022 - Thomas Jefferson Elementary - Playground Project: 2130000-91025 - Providencia Elementary - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($7,305.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants Project Total: ($7,305.00) 2130000-91025 - Providencia Elementary - Roofing Project: 2140000-91025 - Theodore Roosevelt Elem. - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($2,520.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants Project Total: ($2,520.00) 2140000-91025 - Theodore Roosevelt Elem. - Roofing 05/29/2026 02:21 PM Page 1 Encumbrance Report - Vendor Summary MEASURE ABC PROJECT EXPENDITURE REPORT FROM 2-18-2026 TO 5-13-2026

Project: 3210000-91025 - Dolores Huerta Middle - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($7,980.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants Project Total: ($7,980.00) 3210000-91025 - Dolores Huerta Middle - Roofing Project: 3220000-91025 - John Muir Middle - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Best Contracting Services, Inc. ($145,880.62) Roofing Project Total: ($145,880.62) 3220000-91025 - John Muir Middle - Roofing Project: 4310000-91014 - Burbank High - Girls Softball Field Vendor Expenditure Description Westgroup Designs, Inc ($17,667.50) Architecture Project Total: ($17,667.50) 4310000-91014 - Burbank High - Girls Softball Field Project: 4320000-91014 - Burroughs High - Girls Softbal Field ( with Parking and Tennis Courts) Vendor Expenditure Description tBP/Architecture, Inc ($4,977.11) Architecture Project Total: ($4,977.11) 4320000-91014 - Burroughs High - Girls Softbal Field ( with Parking and Tennis Courts) Project: 5300000-91025 - Monterey High - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description R & R Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc $10,050.40 Roofing Project Total: $10,050.40 5300000-91025 - Monterey High - Roofing Project: 5330000-91017 - Adult Education - Storm Drain & Landscape Improv. Vendor Expenditure Description Mollenhauer Group Civil, Inc. ($45,440.00) Civil Engineering Project Total: ($45,440.00) 5330000-91017 - Adult Education - Storm Drain & Landscape Improv. Project: 5330000-91025 - Adult Ed. - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($6,385.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants 05/29/2026 02:21 PM Page 2 Encumbrance Report - Vendor Summary MEASURE ABC PROJECT EXPENDITURE REPORT FROM 2-18-2026 TO 5-13-2026

Project Total: ($6,385.00) 5330000-91025 - Adult Ed. - Roofing Project: 5330000-91025 - Adult Ed. - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Project: 7520000-91025 - Facilities Services - Roofing Vendor Expenditure Description Encorp ($2,745.00) Hazardous Materials Consultants Project Total: ($2,745.00) 7520000-91025 - Facilities Services - Roofing Project: 7520000-92001 - Facilities Services - District project Support Vendor Expenditure Description B.U.S.D. ($36,790.06) District's Project Support Costs Project Total: ($36,790.06) 7520000-92001 - Facilities Services - District project Support Grand Total: ($338,693.23) Burbank Unified School District 05/29/2026 02:21 PM Page 3 Encumbrance Report - Vendor Summary MEASURE ABC PROJECT EXPENDITURE REPORT FROM 2-18-2026 TO 5-13-2026

Questions? Prepared by