Susanville City Council

SUSANVILLE CITY COUNCIL Special Council Meeting Minutes TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 2024 – 5:00 PM Mayor Schuster called the meeting to order at 5:00pm. Roll Call of Councilmembers Present: Mayor Schuster, Mayor pro tem Brown, Council Member Bortle, Council Member Parrish, Council Member Miller 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: (Additions and/or Deletions) Dan Newton, City Manager, requested that item 10A be heard prior to Business from the Floor as most of the audience was in attendance for that item. Moved by Mayor pro tem Brown; seconded by Council Member Bortle to approve as modified. Motion Carried: 5 - 0 Voting For: Schuster, Brown, Bortle, Parrish, Miller Voting Against: None 2. PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (if any): No closed session. 3. CLOSED SESSION: No business. 4. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION: (recess if necessary) The Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation were provided. 5. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR: Item moved to immediately follow Item 10A. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: No business. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No business. 8. COUNCIL DISCUSSION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor pro tem Brown commended the Lassen Community College Men’s Baseball team and Coach Avilla as they have been doing work out on the greens at the golf course the past few days. 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.A Consider Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List Motion to approve Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List. Dan Newton, City Manager, provided an explanation of the item and requested council approval of Resolution No. 24-6303. Council Member Bortle requested that the Lassen County Coordination Council be removed as it is no longer active as well as the Abandoned Vehicle JPA. Mayor Schuster inquired of Mr. Newton if there were any issues with the requested changes to which he responded that he thought Council Member Bortle was correct, so he saw no harm in removing them. 24-6303.pdf Motion to approve Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List.

Moved by Council Member Bortle; seconded by Mayor pro tem Brown to approve with the requested amendments. Motion Carried: 5- 0 Voting For: Schuster, Brown, Bortle, Parrish, Miller Voting Against: None 10. CONTINUING BUSINESS: 10.A Consider Resolution No. 24-6304, approving expenditure of ARPA funds for infrastructure improvements, general plan update, and marketed as presented in proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan. Consider direction to staff regarding providing ARPA funds for private non-profit entities for community benefit. Mr. Newton provided an explanation of the item and requested council discussion, and possible approval, of Resolution No. 24-6304. He specified that the presented resolution is only accounting for $1.204 million, as listed in categories 2-4 on the resolution. He also stated that the remaining funds would be either set aside for a public benefit, to pay off a city debt, or for the purchase of a needed engine for the Fire Department. Mr. Newton continued by stating the additional items were requested as part of the community engagement process. He added that there are many items on the list that would require more research to come up with costs and requested that council provide five projects to move forward so staff can begin researching those chosen to bring back for consideration. Council Member Miller inquired as to whether or not the engine would be new or used to which Chief Bollinger responded that more research would have to occur to determine the best option. Mayor Schuster invited community members to speak on the item stating that each person would have five minutes. Thomas Braun, public, stated his support for a performing arts center. Julianne Pepetone, public, also stated her support for a performing arts center. She added that if the city provided the funds to purchase the building, they would be able to get the volunteers, the fundraising, etc... going. Holly Egan, public, wanted to remind the city council that the pickleball club, approximately 14-16 months ago, requested funds to refurbish the tennis courts. She added that when they approached the council at that time, there were about 60-70 people in the club. She stated that there are now 167 people. She stated that $100,000 may complete this project. Carolyn Smith, Sierra Theatre owner, stated that the theatres have not yet recovered, and will never recover, from Covid. She requested the city consider the idea of the performing arts center. Abby Gerdts, performing artist and arts educator for Julliard in New York, stated that there are no full-time arts teachers in the city. She added that the arts should not be considered a luxury item, as it is essential for growth and much more. She requested city assistance in funding the place where this can occur. Chris Van Deventer, public, stated his concern with the potential spending of funds to specific groups and stated that the city should be utilizing the funds to take care of its

infrastructure. He added that police patrolling should be increased as well as code enforcement. Larry Rogers, Elks Lodge, welcomed the new council members and reminded them of the needs of the Elks Lodge. Linda Alberico, public, stated that she would love to see younger families move here. However, if the city were to purchase the "performing arts center" they should run it to ensure that performances are geared towards younger families and not just the symphony. Jason Rona, public, stated his experience with fixing fire trucks and knows the cost associated with them. He also works on the haunted House for Best of Broadway. He would love to see everyone get everything they are asking for; however, he would like to ensure that city infrastructure and the Fire Department are taken care of first as there will be no city if it burns down. Phil Fetterman, public, stated that there are so many untapped resources in the city and there is a wide array of options to choose from. There are a ton of young people involved in Best of Broadway (150 people), a drum line, a choir at the high school and more. Tom Tinell, public, stated that the last City Council asked the City Manager to find money for the Elks Lodge and yet it is not on the proposed list. He asked that the Elks Lodge not be forgotten. Eileen Richard, public, stated that movie theatres are a for profit business and provide sales tax, etc... for the city. She shared her concern that if the theatres are taken over by a nonprofit organization, does that mean that the city will lose out on sales tax money, etc... She requested those who are requesting money stay to listen to see who else is requesting funding, so they hear what the competition is as it is currently a contest. The performing arts will continue, even without a new venue. Chris Gallagher, Lassen County Board Member and part of the Susanville Symphony, provided a story of a place in San Jose that looked very much like the Sierra Theatre where they charge $40+ per person and then they also serve food and beverages. He stated that his family of four people spent over $650 for two hours on entertainment and that this place was packed. He added that he has been in the Golden Poppy and that is a great asset for the uptown area. Mr. Gallagher also thanked Chief Bollinger for his efforts as the Public Safety Chief. John Shaw, public, brought up the river and that there was a river walk project started by a previous city administrator that should be revitalized. He also reminded the Council of the Rite Aid building being vacant, as well as the empty lot that was previously proposed to have a pocket park. He added that HUSA would assist in that effort as they had approximately $30,000. Ray White, public, also provided his support for the performing arts center. Ben Wade, public, stated that the Symphony does not want the Sierra Theatre, but rather the community wants and needs a performing arts center. He asked the Council to remember why they ran for council, as he was sure it was to make changes and asked how they wanted to build Susanville back up. Maria Fregulia, public, stated her support for the Elks Lodge.

Council Member Parrish inquired as to what Tamra Spade, Economic Development Director, would need for the marketing plan, what it would include, and the cost to which she responded. Council Member Miller stated that when she was looking at the list, specifically the introduction of the firetruck, she sees the necessities. She understands all of the requests, however she would like to consider a vault bathroom at the Little League Park. Council Member Bortle stated that he agreed with the items presented on the Resolution. He inquired as to whether or not the city hall remodel debt was taken off to help pay for the fire engine. He added that the engine is a need, not a want. He added that he sees two lists in front of them. One represents the needs as presented on the resolution and the other is a list of wants. Mayor pro tem Brown is okay moving forward with the list on the resolution. However, he also would like to see Code Enforcement, improved museum storage, and the Elks Lodge on the list. Council Member Parrish requested more information on the fire engine of the Public Safety Chief. He also asked if the city is responsible for running someone else's business or helping a business out. He stated his concern if the Council provided the funding and then the business fails to move forward. Council Member Bortle responded that this is a great point and inquires as to what do we need to do to protect the community interest if something happens to the organization receiving those funds. He stated that he would be fine moving forward with a few of the proposed projects if there was a way to protect the community’s interest. Council Member Parrish stated that he wants to see a business plan and asks why the businesses don't seek out a personal loan. Mayor Schuster stated the following items were on her list to include; museum storage, tennis courts, little league fields (bathrooms and other improvements), golf course irrigation system, and now the firetruck. However, she also wants to know how the arrangements are made to protect the interest. Council Member Bortle requested the city hall remodel debt money ($448,000) to be earmarked for the new fire truck. Mayor pro tem Brown stated it may be better to get a new firetruck as Council Member Parrish stated. Council Member Parrish stated his approval with Category 5, 4, 3, 2. However, he suggested that the $1 million in category 1 go towards the firetruck. Council Member Bortle added that the city will need a way to make money which the city does through collecting sales tax. However, he also added that the Elks Lodge does seem to be a common interest among the Council. He suggested finding a firetruck but use the ARPA funds to invest in something that can bring in money.

Council Member Parrish agreed and requested a business plan to protect the community. He stated he still stands with category 2, 3, 4, 5 and that paying off debt is always a good idea. Mayor Schuster inquired of the members what categories they all agreed with, of which they all agreed with categories 2, 3, & 4. Mr. Newton added that there are some additional funds, for instance, the Dixie Fire monies and Park Mitigation Funds, that the city may be able to use in addition to the ARPA funding if needed. Mayor Schuster requested to discuss category 5 and asked how much the Dixie Fire monies were, to which Mr. Newton responded approximately $580k. Council Member Bortle stated that he would like staff to move forward with potential costs of museum storage improvement, tennis courts and code enforcement and then work with symphony and Elk’s Lodge. Mayor pro tem Brown stated that he would like to take category 5 money and put it towards a fire engine and requested that the Council choose two more projects on the list as staff requested five items and they have only been given three so far. Mr. Newton stated that a bid was received for the tennis courts for $60,000 and park mitigation funds could potentially be used. Council Member Bortle stated that we would like to approve the resolution as presented and then direct staff to gather more information on the other areas for future consideration. Mr. Newton requested Council direction. Council stated that the Council is in support of categories 2-4 and Mr. Newton is to work with the Susanville Symphony and the Elks Lodge. It was also requested that staff bring back information on the museum storage item, the tennis courts, little league bathroom, code enforcement costs and the cost of the firetruck. Proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan.pdf 24-6304.pdf Motion to approve Resolution No. 24-6304, approving expenditure of ARPA funds for infrastructure improvements, general plan update, and marketed as presented in proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan. Consider direction to staff regarding providing ARPA funds for private non-profit entities for community benefit. Moved by Council Member Bortle; seconded by Mayor pro tem Brown to approve. Motion Carried: 5- 0 Voting For: Schuster, Brown, Bortle, Parrish, Miller Voting Against: None 5. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR: No comment. 11. CITY MANAGER REPORTS: Mr. Newton reminded the Council that there will be a special meeting occurring before the regularly scheduled meeting on May 1 st in order to provide Council training . The special meeting will start at 2:30pm.

12. FUTURE COUNCIL ITEMS: Council Member Parrish requested discussion on proclamations and the city website. All in agreement. 13. ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Mayor pro tem Brown; seconded by Council Member Bortle to adjourn at 7:22pm. Motion Carried: 5 - 0 Voting For: Schuster, Brown, Bortle, Parrish, Miller Voting Against: None ____________________________ ____________________________ Heidi Whitlock, City Clerk Mendy Schuster, Mayor Approved on: May 1, 2024

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: (Additions and/or Deletions) 2. PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (if any): Any person may address the Council at this time upon any subject for discussion during Closed Session. 3. CLOSED SESSION: No business. 4. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION: (recess if necessary) Reconvene in open session Pledge of allegiance Invocation Report any changes to agenda Report any action out of Closed Session 5. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR: Any person may address the Council at this time upon any subject on the agenda or not on the agenda within the jurisdiction of the City Council. However, comments on items on the agenda may be reserved until the item is discussed and any matter not on the agenda that requires action will be referred to staff for a report and action at a subsequent meeting. Presentations are subject to a five-minute limit. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: No business. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No business. 8. COUNCIL DISCUSSION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.A Consider Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List 10. CONTINUING BUSINESS: 10.A Consider Resolution No. 24-6304, approving expenditure of ARPA funds for infrastructure improvements, general plan update, and marketed as presented in proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan. Consider direction to staff regarding providing ARPA funds for private non- profit entities for community benefit. 11. CITY MANAGER REPORTS: 12. FUTURE COUNCIL ITEMS: CITY OF SUSANVILLE 66 N. Lassen Street • Susanville CA Mendy Schuster, Mayor Russ Brown, Mayor pro tem Curtis Bortle • Patrick Parrish • Dawn Miller Susanville City Council Special Council Meeting • City Council Chambers Tuesday, April 23, 2024 – 5:00 PM

13. ADJOURNMENT: I, Heidi Whitlock, City Clerk of the city of Susanville, do hereby certify that an original of the NOTICE OF CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING, April 23, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. was delivered to each and every person set forth on the list contained herein on the 19th day of April, 2024. A copy of said Notice is attached hereto. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Susanville, California this 19th day of April, 2024.

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: (Additions and/or Deletions) 2. PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (if any): Any person may address the Council at this time upon any subject for discussion during Closed Session. 3. CLOSED SESSION: No business. 4. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION: (recess if necessary) Reconvene in open session Pledge of allegiance Invocation Report any changes to agenda Report any action out of Closed Session 5. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR: Any person may address the Council at this time upon any subject on the agenda or not on the agenda within the jurisdiction of the City Council. However, comments on items on the agenda may be reserved until the item is discussed and any matter not on the agenda that requires action will be referred to staff for a report and action at a subsequent meeting. Presentations are subject to a five-minute limit. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: No business. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No business. 8. COUNCIL DISCUSSION/ANNOUNCEMENTS: 9. NEW BUSINESS: 9.A Consider Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List 10. CONTINUING BUSINESS: 10.A Consider Resolution No. 24-6304, approving expenditure of ARPA funds for infrastructure improvements, general plan update, and marketed as presented in proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan. Consider direction to staff regarding providing ARPA funds for private non- profit entities for community benefit. 11. CITY MANAGER REPORTS: 12. FUTURE COUNCIL ITEMS: CITY OF SUSANVILLE 66 N. Lassen Street • Susanville CA Mendy Schuster, Mayor Russ Brown, Mayor pro tem Dawn Miller • Patrick Parrish • Curtis Bortle Susanville City Council Special Council Meeting • City Council Chambers Tuesday, April 23, 2024 – 5:00 PM 1

13. ADJOURNMENT: I, Heidi Whitlock, City Clerk of the city of Susanville, do hereby certify that an original of the NOTICE OF CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING, April 23, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. was delivered to each and every person set forth on the list contained herein on the 19th day of April, 2024. A copy of said Notice is attached hereto. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Susanville, California this 19th day of April, 2024. 2

AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.A Action Item Submitted By: Heidi Whitlock, Administrative Services Action Date: April 23, 2024 SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List PRESENTED BY: Dan Newton, City Manager SUMMARY: Susanville City Council members, as part of their official elected duties, serve on various boards, commissions, and committees. After an election, when the City Council has been reorganized, or at other times when representation has changed, it is customary for the Mayor to make recommendations for committee appointments which are then discussed and either accepted or amended by the City Council. The recommendations are then formally adopted by the City Council by resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Resolution No. 24-6303, amending the Susanville City Council Committee List. SUSANVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM ATTACHMENTS: 24-6303.pdf 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 24-6303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUSANVILLE AMENDING THE SUSANVILLE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE LIST WHEREAS, the members of the City Council of the City of Susanville have the responsibility, as part of their official duties, to participate in the activities of various boards, commissions and committees within the jurisdiction of the City of Susanville, County of Lassen and State of California; and WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Susanville makes recommendations appointing individuals to serve on various boards, commissions and committees, and to sit on new committees, boards or commissions; and WHEREAS, the term of appointment shall continue until amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Susanville approves the Susanville City Council Committee List, attached hereto as Exhibit A, as recommended by the Mayor of the City of Susanville. APPROVED: ____________________________ Mendy Schuster, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Heidi Whitlock, City Clerk The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Susanville held on the 23rd day of April, 2024 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________________ Heidi Whitlock, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Margaret Long, City Attorney 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Exhibit A SUSANVILLE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE LIST April 23, 2024 * Resolution No. 24-6303 Committee Representative Meetings Abandoned Vehicle JPA Patrick Parrish Annual. No current meeting Curtis Bortle (alt) schedule Airport Land Use Commission Russ Brown No current frequency. Curtis Bortle Thursday at 1:30 pm as needed. Mendy Schuster (alt) Association of California Cities Patrick Parrish Annual Allied with Public Safety (ACCAPS) Mendy Schuster (alt) CDBG Loan Committee Dawn Miller As Needed During Business Mendy Schuster Hours. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Curtis Bortle Bi-monthly, fourth Monday, at 12:00 pm Honey Lake Valley Recreation Curtis Bortle Monthly/ third Tuesday, 3:00pm Authority Russ Brown Dawn Miller (alt) Local Agency Formation Mendy Schuster Every other month, Commission (LAFCO) Dawn Miller second Monday – 3:00 pm Russ Brown (alt) Lassen County Air Pollution Patrick Parrish Monthly, second Control District Mendy Schuster Tuesday – 3:00 pm Curtis Bortle Dawn Miller (alt) Lassen County Coordination Council Curtis Bortle Monthly, third Monday-6:30 pm Dawn Miller Lassen County Transportation Dawn Miller Monthly, second Monday-1:00pm Commission (LCTC) Russ Brown Lassen Transit Authority Mendy Schuster Patrick Parrish (alt) Lassen Regional Solid Waste Russ Brown Monthly, fourth Tuesday Patrick Parrish Mendy Schuster (alt) 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 League of California Cities Mendy Schuster Quarterly, No Current Schedule Russ Brown (alt) Regional Water Management Russ Brown As Needed, During Business Group Bob Godman (alt) Hours Emergency Medical Care Curtis Bortle As Needed, During Business Committee (EMCC) Hours 6

AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.A Discussion Item Submitted By: Dan Newton, Administrative Services Action Date: April 23, 2024 SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 24-6304, approving expenditure of ARPA funds for infrastructure improvements, general plan update, and marketed as presented in proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan. Consider direction to staff regarding providing ARPA funds for private non-profit entities for community benefit. PRESENTED BY: Dan Newton, City Administrator SUMMARY: Attached is a proposed ARPA expenditure plan for City Council's consideration. Staff is requesting City Council consider adopting Resolution No.24-6304, approving the city infrastructure improvement projects, allocating $200,000 in ARPA funds for the general plan update, and expenditure of $159,000 for marketing Susanville. Staff is also requesting that City Council earmark funds to be used as private investment for community benefit and direct the City Manager to negotiate terms and conditions of project delivery and property acquisition agreements as appropriate. Once completed, draft agreements will be brought back to City Council for comment and approval. History: On December 20, 2023, City Council discussed the proposed expenditure of ARPA funds. The discussion included the list of projects received and ranking criteria. On January 17, 2024, City Council again discussed the proposed expenditure of ARPA funds. The discussion included a ranked list of projects. Council directed staff to bring back a report regarding the city's debt pay-off amount, including interest savings if the loans were paid off, and a plan to bolster the city's code enforcement program. Staff provided reports on both of the items at the meeting. In addition, the City Council set February 7, 2024 as the deadline for submitting requests for the use of ARPA funds. On February 7, 2024, City Council discussed the item and took input from the public. Council directed staff to prepare a recommended ARPA expenditure plan based on the discussed ranking criteria, with consideration of previously discussed funding categories and any SUSANVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 7

other consideration as directed by Council. On February 21, 2024, City Council discussed the item again and took input from the public. Staff has prepared a recommended ARPA expenditure plan for consideration by City Council. On March 4, 2024, City Council considered a draft ARPA expenditure plan, and directed staff to bring the item back after the new city council was seated. The American Rescue Plan Act provided approximately $3.5 million to the city of Susanville. The funds can be used for a variety of items with an expenditure/obligation deadline of December 31, 2024. On January 6, 2022, the U.S. Department of Treasury released their Final Rule for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery (SLFRF) under ARPA. The most flexible spending category under the SLFRF grant program is “Replacement of Lost Revenue” for government services, which the final rule says generally includes any service traditionally provided by local governments. To take advantage of this category of spending, the interim rule required all grantees, regardless of size, to perform a complex calculation to determine how much revenue a locality could claim as lost. The final rule presents a significantly simpler option by permitting local governments to choose a “standard allowance” for lost revenue of $10 million for the lifetime of their grant. Local governments may continue to use the amount provided under the calculation, but for those that select the standard allowance, they may use up to $10 million for government services with streamlined reporting requirements compared to those that choose to stay with their calculated amount. In practice, almost no Non-Entitlement Unit of local governments received a grant larger than $10 million under the SLFRF program. So, in effect, the rule excuses all local governments with fewer than 50,000 residents who received their grant through their state from requirements associated with the calculation of lost revenue, if they choose, and instead allows all those smaller cities and towns to claim the standard allowance. The city has approximately $2.5 million in ARPA funds remaining. At previous council meetings the City Council discussed apportioning the funds to the following categories: $1,000,000 for economic development as an external investment. For example, improving Main St. building facades. $500,000 for economic development as an internal investment. For example, hiring an outside firm to provide professional development training to city staff and recommend improvements to development processes. $500,000 for marketing Susanville and $500,000 for city facility repairs and improvements. Input has been provided by the public as well as city staff and council members. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure of approximately $2.65 million in ARPA funds. Resolution No. 24-6304 authorizes the expenditure of $1,204,000 in 8

ARPA funds for city facility improvements, economic development marketing, general plan updates, and economic development marketing campaigns. Consider earmarking or allocating the remaining $1,446,000 for various other projects to be discussed at the meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Resolution No. 24-6304, approving expenditure of ARPA funds for infrastructure improvements, general plan update, and marketed as presented in proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan. Consider direction to staff regarding providing ARPA funds for private non-profit entities for community benefit. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan.pdf 24-6304.pdf 9

Proposed ARPA Expenditure Plan Introduc�on: In 2022, the city of Susanville received $3.59 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. The funds were received during a �me of financial crisis for the city, when the city was facing a $1.2 million deficit budget. Approximately $0.94 million in ARPA funds have been expended for items such as opera�ng capital, essen�al worker premium pay, and numerous smaller items. The city has $2.65 million in ARPA funds remaining for disbursement. The intended use of ARPA funds encompasses an approach aimed at addressing pressing needs, fostering recovery, and promo�ng long-term resilience within our community. These funds were earmarked for a variety of cri�cal purposes, including but not limited to economic revitaliza�on, public health ini�a�ves, infrastructure improvements, and support for vulnerable popula�ons affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, this proposal allocates ARPA funds towards s�mula�ng local businesses and enhancing infrastructure and services. Through strategic alloca�on and responsible stewardship of ARPA funds, we aim to build a stronger, more resilient community that is beter equipped to thrive in the face of future challenges. Many promising ideas have been brought forward by community members, the City Council, community organiza�ons, and city staff. The engagement from the community on this item has been impressive and inspiring. Unfortunately, there is not enough funding available to accommodate all of the requests. This proposed plan has been prepared the Council’s considera�on, the plan takes into account previous discussions at public mee�ngs, Council direc�on, and public input. The proposed plan considers the scoring matrix, overall community benefit, public infrastructure, and debt repayment. The scoring matrix and criteria defini�ons are included in this report as Atachment A. Projects were scored across sixteen (16) categories and overall project scores ranged from 10 to 30. To provide con�nuity between previous and current discussions, each project was placed into one of five categories closely represen�ng each of the four (4) categories that were derived during 2022 City Council discussion. The four (4) 2022 categories are as follows: 1. Economic Development – External Investment 2. Economic Development – Internal Investment 3. Economic Development – Marke�ng 4. City Infrastructure Improvements A fi�h debt repayment category has been added as shown on the next page. All recommended projects scored 22 or above on the ranking criteria matrix. Many high-scoring projects are not recommended for funding in part to ensure that cri�cal infrastructure needs within the city and par�al debt repayment are addressed. 10

The proposed ARPA fund expenditures have been divided into 5 categories as provided below and included in the atached project ranking list/scoring matrix (Atachment A). • Category 1: Private investment for community benefit • Category 2: Invest in marke�ng of Susanville to support economic development. • Category 3: Invest in organiza�on efficiency by upda�ng exis�ng policies and procedures, developing new policies and procedures, and training staff in the implementa�on of them. • Category 4: Invest in the organiza�on by addressing infrastructure needs. • Category 5: Payoff Debt. Category 1: $1,000,000: Private Investment for Community Benefit Performing Arts Center $1,000,000 1,000,000$ Category 2: Marketing Susanville Marketing Campaign $159,048 $159,048 Category 3: Policies/Procedures Complete General Plan Update 50% $200,000 $200,000 Category 4: Infrastructure Fire Department Heating/Roof $520,000 Police Department Interior/Exterior Roof $250,000 City Hall Interior Repairs $75,000 $845,000 Category 5: Payoff Debt $447,462 PNC Bank : City Hall Loan $447,462 $447,462 TOTAL $2,651,510 TOTAL ARPA FUNDS AVAILABLE $2,651,510 11

Category 1: Private investment for community benefit. Inves�ng ARPA funding into the development of a privately operated performing arts center for public benefit is a decision that can yield significant long-term advantages for our city. Such a project not only serves as a cultural hub but also fosters economic growth and community cohesion. Private projects o�en possess the agility and resources necessary to implement crea�ve solu�ons to complex challenges. A performing arts center has the poten�al to revitalize our city's cultural landscape, offering diverse programming that enriches the lives of residents and atracts visitors. By leveraging ARPA funds to support this project, we can s�mulate job crea�on in the arts sector, bolstering our local economy and providing opportuni�es for ar�sts and performers. The establishment of a performing arts center in the heart of the community not only enhances cultural enrichment but also preserves the historic integrity of the Sierra Theater, ensuring that it remains a cherished and invaluable asset for genera�ons to come. Category 2: Marke�ng Using ARPA funding for a comprehensive marke�ng campaign is an investment with far-reaching benefits for our city. In �mes of economic uncertainty and recovery, effec�ve communica�on is paramount to s�mulate local commerce, atract investment, and foster community resilience. A well-executed marke�ng campaign can showcase the unique atributes of our city, highligh�ng its strengths, atrac�ons, and opportuni�es for growth. By strategically promo�ng our city as a desirable des�na�on for tourism, business, and investment, we can s�mulate economic ac�vity, create jobs, and generate revenue streams vital for our post-pandemic recovery efforts. Moreover, a robust marke�ng campaign can enhance community pride and engagement, ins�lling confidence in residents and stakeholders alike. By leveraging ARPA funds to support a dynamic marke�ng ini�a�ve, we not only amplify the visibility of our city on a regional and na�onal scale but also lay the groundwork for sustained prosperity and vitality in the years to come. Inves�ng in a marke�ng campaign is not just an expenditure; it's an investment in the future success and prosperity of our city and its residents. Category 3: Policies and Procedures Inves�ng in a comprehensive update of the city's general plan is not merely a mater of urban planning; it is a strategic move that can significantly bolster economic prosperity. By ensuring that our city's policies align with current economic reali�es and future opportuni�es, we can atract investment, s�mulate job crea�on, and foster business growth. A well-cra�ed general plan update can iden�fy strategic areas for development, streamline regulatory processes, and promote development that supports a diverse economy. 12

Inves�ng ARPA funding in a comprehensive update of the city's general plan is essen�al to ensuring the con�nued economic well-being and growth of our community. The general plan serves as the backbone of our city's development, guiding decisions on land use, transporta�on, housing, safety, and environmental protec�on. By alloca�ng ARPA funds to update the general plan, we can ensure that our policies and strategies are relevant, responsive, and reflec�ve of our current needs and priori�es. Category 4: Infrastructure Inves�ng ARPA funding into repairing vital city buildings, including the police department, fire department, and city hall, is an impera�ve step towards safeguarding the well-being and safety of our community. These buildings are paramount to the provision of essen�al city services. Neglec�ng their maintenance jeopardizes the func�onality of these cri�cal facili�es. By alloca�ng Inves�ng in infrastructure improvements demonstrates our commitment to priori�zing public safety and civic engagement, ins�lling confidence in residents and building public trust. Furthermore, inves�ng in the repair of vital city buildings has broader economic implica�ons, serving as a catalyst for local job crea�on and economic ac�vity. The construc�on and renova�on projects necessitated by building repairs will generate employment opportuni�es for construc�on workers, contractors, and other related industries, s�mula�ng economic growth at the local level. Category 5: Pay-off debt Using ARPA funding to pay off debt is a strategic and prudent decision that can yield numerous benefits for our city's financial health and long-term stability. By allevia�ng the burden of exis�ng debt obliga�ons, we can free up valuable resources that can be redirected towards cri�cal priori�es such as infrastructure improvements, public services, and economic development ini�a�ves. Paying off debt not only reduces interest payments over �me but also improves our city's creditworthiness, poten�ally lowering borrowing costs for future projects and investments. Moreover, reducing debt levels enhances our fiscal resilience, providing a buffer against economic downturns and unforeseen emergencies. Conclusion: The proposed expenditure plan for the ARPA funds reflects a though�ul and strategic approach aimed at addressing the immediate needs of our community while also laying the groundwork for long-term resilience and prosperity. The plan priori�zes investments across five key categories, encompassing private investment for community benefit, marke�ng, policies and procedures, infrastructure, and debt repayment. Through careful considera�on of public input, council direc�on, and community benefit, this plan seeks to maximize the impact of ARPA funds, ensuring that they are u�lized effec�vely to support economic revitaliza�on, enhance public services, and promote the well-being of all residents. 13

Attachment A 14

PROPOSED IDEAS/PROJECTS Overall Score Funding Category Recommended Code Enforcement Abatement Fund 30 3 Sewer Capacity Study 30 4 Backhoe with Mowing Boom 27 4 New Christmas Lights 27 3 Stake Park Design - $15,000 27 4 Performing Arts Center 27 1 X New Christmas Decorations (more than lights) 26 3 Building Façade Vouchers 25 1 Pay off Debt 25 5 X Repair Tennis Courts 23 4 Animal Control Program Funding 23 3 Pickle Ball Courts 23 4 City Hall Interior Repairs 23 4 X S.E. Gateway Landscaping 23 1 Elks Lodge Facility Support 23 1 T-Hangars at Airport 22 4 Fire Dept Heating 22 4 X Police Dept Exterior Repairs 22 4 X Electric Vehicle Charging Stations 22 4 Goathead Abatement Program 22 3 Hope Wheels 22 2 Fire Dept Roof 22 4 X Police Dept Roof 22 4 X Police Dept Interior Repairs 22 4 X Bark Park grass and site amenities 21 4 Message Board at Memorial Park Bathroom 21 4 Indoor Sports Facility 21 1 Airport Fire Protection & Hydrants 21 4 General Plan Housing Element 21 3 Compost Facility 21 4 Community Security Cameras 20 1 Street Dept Equipment - Crack Sealer 20 4 Museum Storage Building 19 4 Solar Lights for Susan River Trail 19 4 Fire Department Property Expansion 19 4 Pool Landscaping 19 4 Main Street Crosswalk Safety Improvements 19 4 Scooters for the trail 18 3 Main St. Decorative Solar Lights 18 4 Main Street Safety Study Implementation 18 1 Golf Course Irrigation Improvements 18 4 Homeless Encampment Cleanup Funding 18 3 Susan River Parkway 17 4 Bike Rack/Bike Lane 17 4 Uptown Pocket Park 17 4 Veterans Memorial Exhibit in Memorial Park 17 4 Development Infrastructure Improvements (internet improvements, bu 17 4 Speed Survey Consultants 17 3 Purchase Dr. Uppal's property for Crossroads Ministries $1 million 17 1 Little League Parking Improvemetns 16 4 Golf Course Tunnel 16 4 Citizen's Boot Camp - How to keep your property safe 15 3 Repave Susan River Trail 13 4 Sidewalk Repair / New Sidewalk 12 4 Improve Water Infrastructure for Fire Protection 12 4 Marketing Susanville 12 2 Susanville Agriculture Park 10 1 Project List 15

Criteria Definitions: 1) Transparency: Proposed expenditure of funds will lead to improved public access/awareness to city government processes 2) Improve Main Street: Proposed expenditure of funds will lead to improvements to Susanville’s Main