POLISCOPE

POLISCOPE product walkthrough

Trace a local decision from committee to final vote

On May 20, 2026, a Denver City Council committee voted on a $79.6 million security contract for Denver International Airport. Here is how to follow that one item from the POLISCOPE meeting record to the official minutes and the full Council vote, and what each record can and cannot tell you.

City and County of Denver · Sources checked · Every claim links to its record

Step 01

Start at the meeting record

The POLISCOPE record for the May 20 Transportation and Infrastructure meeting puts the whole committee agenda on one page: 20 actions, each with its recorded outcome, a list of every dollar amount, and a link to the official minutes they came from.

The largest amount is Council Resolution 26-0598: an agreement with ACTS Airport Services, Inc. for $79,553,656.26 for three years plus two one-year extensions, for security guard services at the airport’s curbside and public spaces, in Council District 11. The same meeting also took up eight $8,000,000 on-call engineering contracts for the airport, three United Airlines incentive agreements for new international routes, and a $1,151,335 street milling contract.

The record labels itself partial coverage. Its source is the minutes, and the page says plainly that the published sources do not prove the docket is complete.

Step 02

Open the official minutes

The meeting page links to the committee’s published minutes (PDF). Nineteen actions are marked “approved by consent.” Resolution 26-0598 has a separately recorded vote:

Motion
Council President Amanda Sandoval
Second
Council member Flor Alvidrez
Action
Approved for filing
Aye (6)
Alvidrez, Flynn, Gilmore, Hinds, Kashmann, Sandoval
Nay
None
Absent (1)
Lewis, the committee chair

The minutes list eight people present, including two Council members who do not sit on the committee. Only the six committee members voted.

Step 03

Check what “approved for filing” means

The word “approved” is easy to misread here. The Council’s own legislative process explainer (PDF) says a committee can hold a bill or resolution or pass it to the full Council, and that items cannot be “killed” in committee. A resolution gets its final vote at the full Council. A bill for an ordinance needs two readings: the first vote only orders it published, and the second is the final vote.

So on May 20, 26-0598 was forwarded, not adopted. The item’s own text adds a deadline: the last regularly scheduled Council meeting within its 30-day review period was June 22, 2026.

Step 04

Follow it to the full Council

The Legistar file for 26-0598 shows the rest of the trail. At the June 1, 2026 City Council meeting, on a motion by Council member Amanda Sawyer seconded by Council member Darrell Watson, the resolution was adopted en bloc. The Council minutes (PDF) record the vote as 13-0, and the file shows it signed by the Council President the same day. Its status is Adopted.

Compare a bill from the same committee meeting. Council Bill 26-0636, which vacates an alley next to 3800 West Colfax Avenue, was only ordered published on June 1. It passed on final consideration on June 8 (minutes, PDF), 11-0 with two members absent, and the file shows the Mayor signed it on June 9.

This is where the POLISCOPE meeting record ends. It covers the committee meeting, and its “what happens next” panel finds no later date in the minutes. The later Council votes are in Legistar, one link away.

Step 05

Read the request behind it

The file also links the airport’s committee presentation (PDF). It describes the work (terminal traffic management, access control, alarm response, patrols of the terminal, transit center and public parking) and the selection: a competitive request for proposals with eight qualified bidders, interviews with the top three, and ACTS ranked first. It also says ACTS is the current contractor with 140 personnel at the airport, and that the contract carries a 5% minority- and women-owned business goal, with Advanced Professional Security as the subcontractor.

The takeaway

What the records support, and what they don’t

You can say

  • The Transportation and Infrastructure Committee forwarded Resolution 26-0598 to the full Council on May 20, 2026, by a 6-0 vote with the chair absent.
  • The full City Council adopted it on June 1, 2026, 13-0, as one of the items in a single en bloc vote.
  • The agreement is with ACTS Airport Services, Inc., for $79,553,656.26, for three years plus two optional one-year extensions, covering security guard services at Denver International Airport’s curbside and public areas.
  • The airport says it chose ACTS through a competitive request for proposals with eight qualified bidders, and that ACTS is the current contractor.

The records don’t show

  • How much has been paid. The records show the amount Council approved for the agreement, not invoices or spending.
  • Whether either one-year extension will be used.
  • Why any member voted as they did. The item passed in an en bloc vote, the minutes record no debate on it, and POLISCOPE has no attributed speech from this meeting.
  • How well the contractor performs. The presentation is the airport’s own description of the work and the vendor.
  • That the committee vote settled anything. Under Denver’s process, a committee forwards items; the full Council’s June 1 vote is what adopted this one.

A news rewrite would give you the headline number. The record trail gives you the vote, the stage, the deadline and the source for each, so you can tell a committee recommendation from a final decision before you repeat it.

Try it on your own government

Find the decisions near you

Federal coverage is national. Local coverage - county campaign finance, contracts, commission and school-board agendas - is deepest in the Florida pilot counties, led by Sarasota and Manatee. Other jurisdictions are present but thinner.

A walkthrough by POLISCOPE. Spot an error? Tell us with the page and the source.