118th Avenue Acquisition, LLC

The available records identify this entity, but do not yet include a plain-English role description.

1. Tue, Jun 232 items
   1. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-18. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINELLAS PARK, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY’S OFFICIAL LAND USE PLAN MAP BY PROVIDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF INDUSTRIAL LIMITED (IL) FOR CERTAIN LANDS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6868 118TH AVENUE NORTH AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; CERTIFYING CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY’S ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE - (LUPA-0625-00006, 118th Avenue Acquisition, LLC) PUBLIC HEARING, SECOND AND FINAL READING (Speaker - Todd Biron, Senior Planner)The entity associated with the land use application (LUPA-0625-00006).
   2. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-17. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINELLAS PARK, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING AND APPROVING A VOLUNTARY PETITION FOR ANNEXATION, ANNEXING INTO THE CITY A CERTAIN CONTIGUOUS PARCEL OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6868 118TH AVENUE NORTH AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "A" WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF CITY ZONING CLASSIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES CONFLICTING HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE - (AX-2025-00005, 118th Avenue Acquisition, LLC) PUBLIC HEARING, SECOND AND FINAL READING (Speaker - Todd Biron, Senior Planner)
2. Tue, Jun 91 item
   1. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WITH 118TH AVENUE ACQUISITION, LLC - (AX-2025-00005)The private entity entering into the annexation agreement with the city.

POLISCOPE has no related bills, finance activity or mapped connections for this entity in the records it has processed. That is a gap in coverage, not a finding about the entity.